The Legendary Hellfire Missile Replacement are Coming - AGM-179 JAGM
Вставка
- Опубліковано 30 тра 2023
- AGM-179 Joint Air-to-Ground Missile ( JAGM ) Replacing the legendary the Hellfire missile. In the realm of advanced weapon systems, there arose a need for a new air-to-ground missile that could surpass its predecessors. The story begins with the remarkable minds of Lockheed Martin, a renowned manufacturer known for their expertise in cutting-edge technologies. Driven by the desire to create a weapon of unmatched precision and versatility, Lockheed Martin embarked on a quest to invent the AGM-179 Joint Air-to-Ground Missile, also known as the JAGM. Countless hours were spent in research and development, combining the best features of the AGM-114 Hellfire and the BGM-71 TOW missile to forge a new path forward.
Subscribe Now :
/ @military-tv - Наука та технологія
After listening to this puff piece I'm pretty sure Lockheed Martin can walk on water and turn water into wine. There is just nothing these miracle workers can't do. Amen.
😂 was thinking the same thing
I recently read that the U.S. Army is less than impressed with the JAGM since better options for long-range, fire-and-forget weapons have emerged on the market. The desire for much longer range is not satisfied by the JAGM.
missile that can hit both air targets and ground targets, cool
I can't find anywhere else saying it can lock onto aircraft. However some systems like Javelin & I believe hellfire were listen as ATG but could also hit some rotary aircraft. Maybe the same deal here?
If you can't make large numbers affordability it won't matter how good it is.
What a self-congratulatory video.
So it’s basically the laser guided and radar guided hellfires combined into one missile?
And with 324,000 dollars you can buy the spike nlos with a range of 31 miles with optic guidance, you can guide the missile into a window for crying out loud.
And absolutely devastating
I am sure they aren’t releasing all its specifications. That would just be stupid.
6:33 WHAT THE HELL IS THAT BEAUTIFUL BABY!!!
JAGM range is no greater than hellfire. Its simply a targeting upgrade. At least at this point.
@@dawadahephraimyasharahla8602 I should point out that jamming the local GPS merely degrades the accuracy of the JDAM as it has a digital-autopilot and that jamming means nothing if it's fitted with a terminal-seeker.
No doubt its' warhead and rocket-motor will be upgraded in the near future.
Allows them to more than double the price though, higher profit margins because "it's new".
It has increased ranged
@@nicholasmaude6906 you're thinking of JDAM as in the bomb, JAGM has a laser and radar guidance system according to public sources I can find
Seeing it fired from a C130 was cool! Imagine this in Ukraine with a 5+ mile range and the new autonomous targetting!??
the aircraft would be shot down immidiately because Russia has far more range than 5 + miles
Good...thank you.
it seems that America is starting to fall behind in missile systems. 8km pretty short range nowadays.
This video sounds like a business sales pitch for LM. 😂
The Brit's are upgrading their Brimestone missiles as well, Hellfire and Brimstone coming to you!
Sappy Overripe Mataphors Overwhelm the viewers Endlessly!
exceptional missile - exploding costs
Military/Industrial Complex on full display!
how about javeline? did they add a third shift?
The A.G.M.-179 J.A.G.M. marks a turning point in the history of air-to-ground missils.
Doesn't look better than spike nlos in any aspect (price, range etc.) except for the radar, but it is 100% US made, and that seems to be the no. 1 important feature for US army
Nlos is much bigger on the wing tho. This looks like a 1 for 1 replacement for the 114.
@@scourge3162 I guess than the SPIKE ER2 would do, BTW, US army already tested Apache AH 64 with NLOS
What about other nations who using hellfire missile
3 for a million bucks. What a deal.
So this is PR for Lockheed/Martin?
I need these on my F-150.
this is how it is nowdays in usa no matter if its software company or military gear company. they innovate very slowly but their subscription fee is very high backed by marketing.
I wonder why the range is to short.
Whenever anyone mentions Hellfire missiles or Sidewinder rockets it always brings back memories of the classic game Desert Strike on the Sega Megadrive/Genesis
I don't know if it will be any better than the Hellfire. The Hellfire cost half, has similar operational distance, similar warhead, and on top of that it has decades of proven combat experience which has proven its reliability. I can't see the upgrade, to be honest. At least not against the Hellfire.
I think the idea is that it helps load out and logistics.
You can just load up a launcher with these and not care about what targeting is needed for the mission. And as long as you have these missiles in stock locally, you don't worry about having the wrong type.
You are right if satellite signals are not jammed.
I'd think a multiple of mass units coming from one missile would be the best overall.
Essentially a Brimstone clone only with a shorter range. Also, Brimstone is capable of being launched from the ground.
who make the Brimstone ???
MBDA UK, Henlow
Why was an air target being shot down presented as JAGAM?
Dude got his communications wire stuck in the missile. 3:00 mark
Half that cost would build me a nice house..
Since the old stock is used up in gaza
👍🏻👍🏻
324,000 $ each ? ouuuch....that's four times the cost of an Hellfire missile. if the missions only request to laser designate targets JAGM is not the best option. How can they justify such cost when, for example, MBDA UK is producing the Brimstone missile with similar Millimeter wave radar/SAL guidances and similar flight performances for nearly half the cost per unit ? hoping this cost will decrease to the extend that more and more are produced and are progressively replacing the hellfire (and for the sake of tax payers).
👍🏽Brilliant, just don’t forget to leave them when you’re in a hurry in Afghanistan or Iran this time 😂
Ukraine 🇺🇦 needs those missiles 🇬🇧 🇺🇸
The video content is confusing. This is represented as strictly an air-to-ground missile. Yet the video frequently shows ground based launching without once mentioning that it can also be ground launched.
It can be launched other ways, but it's almost exclusively used for ATG. At 300 K per bang, there are much cheaper ways to do things from the ground.
@@loupgarou-dj3tm Makes sense. Thanks for the reply.
They said it was supposed to replace both the Hellfire and Tow missiles. So that would guess that mean both an air and ground launch versions
c130 with missiles hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm
Need to get price down . Excessive. Cost not certain it 5 times better then hellfire. U can fire 3 hell fire at one target and still cheaper then this .
SPIKE NLOS has 30mile range. 6 miles seems low
I'm pretty sure the whole point of this weapon is it's not post to be over the horizon. meaning it don't need something else to help it find its target.
@@snsproduc Depending on the altitude, 30 miles is not over the horizon. It takes a height of only 200 meters (600 feet) to see at 50km/30mile distance. An Apache can fly low, lift for a few seconds to 200-250m acquire and release and drop down again out of any kind of air defence. This is the most effective way to take down airdefence other than a HARM missile or simple drones.
The NLOS has longer range but only usable with drones and helicopters
The JAGM can be used with different types of aircraft
The NLOS is design mainly for surface to surface firing in situations where the IDF may have to deal with contested air space
🇺🇲🇺🇦👍👍💪
Then Ukraine will get the the old redundant version
Let give the older version to Ukraine and Taiwan.
$300,000 for one missile and they say that’s cost-effective more like gouging the US government because one company has a complete monopoly over a very important weapon. 😂
So right now we are dumping all the old Hell Fires on the poor Russians?
which middle-east country has this new baby tested onto?
South Dakota
Кто это до сих пор на аэрокобрах летает?
Have you ever noticed, not a single weapons manufacturer has to account. For the absurd BS costs of what they produce?🖕?
Please tell me how it cost $365,000 to make this freaking missile! BULL SHIT!🤬!
I think it is time these weapon manufacturers give account of production costs!🤔!
Too expensive . Should be in $50k range for 5 mile range missle
Healthcare Please :(
You can forget about that. Destroy other with expensive weapons is the top priority. Sorry your worthless soul doesn't matter. More dollar 🤑 please..
think of all the babies that thing roasted alive
That's not the point
So far the count is 0. Since it won't be sold to Russia hopefully it stays at that number.
@@robertjohnston8531 idk i heard there is an ample black market for these kinds of weapons
Nice
Nice and crispy please, I’ll take 4
Its just a moodernize Hellfire ii😹😹😹 in name of JAGM
5 miles??? lmao hahaahahahahaahaa so just a hellifre with same range sort of. but mm wavelength radar?? lol why is it not faster with more range. cant out range chinas or russias modern mobile anti air. so sad america
Yeah,, until the JAGM is JAMed by Russia!! Then it's a half million dollar DUDM!!
If you want an expensive weapon, buy an American one,
If you want a high-tech weapon, buy a German one,
If you want a beautiful weapon, buy a French one,
And if you really decided to fight, then buy Russian!
Ukraine war says otherwise
If you decided to pocket 10 percent of the price and don't care if your troops die, buy Russian.
Get lost troll
@@loupgarou-dj3tm If you need advice on this, ask the opinion of Ukrainians who have been in real battles
@@Hadeshands Perhaps you are a fan of such channels as Daily Mail
Costs more than the things it blows up lol
The things that get blown up usually cause way more damage if not blown up
@ixyzyxi but the old system didn't have a problem blowing it up.
And you can say the same for an RPG-7, cheaper than a hellfire.
Missiles need the longer range, as in Ukraine or other wars showed, short legged missled pt the unch platforms in risk.
@@WarWithIn Actually in Ukraine in urban warfare the short range NLAW was found to be more useful than longer ranged ATGMs. Each has it's use.
@@robertjohnston8531 I was referring to the attack helicopter/drones, but you do make a point, as now even the Hydra (APKWS)70mm rockets being guided now, which works well for unarmoured targets.
The reason I was talking about longer range weapons, was the amount of helicopters lost in Ukraine by both sides, even fighter 😳 fell to the manpads, and we are not talking about big SAM systems.
I remember the 1973 October war, when the Egyptian Airdefence forced the IDF to get to lower Altitude and then they were attacked by Shilka's and Sa-7s.
US junk
Bs then who is superior then.