The Evolution of “Made in China” Products

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 2 чер 2024
  • Have you ever noticed how flipping over almost anything in your house reveals those three little words: “Made in China”? So how did China manage to become an export powerhouse?
    Subscribe to Morning Brew
    Sign up for free today: www.morningbrew.com/daily/sub...
    Follow The Brew!
    Instagram - / morningbrew
    Twitter - / morningbrew
    Tik Tok - / morningbrew

КОМЕНТАРІ • 114

  • @datchannelable
    @datchannelable Місяць тому +48

    The other reason that stuff on Temu is so cheap is because most of it is dogshit.

    • @TheDoomer666
      @TheDoomer666 Місяць тому +1

      cry more

    • @datchannelable
      @datchannelable Місяць тому +13

      @@TheDoomer666 imagine fighting on the side of cheap Chinese knockoffs

    • @blisphul8084
      @blisphul8084 Місяць тому

      AliExpress is better, since it has better selection, and now has local shipping. Temu is just a more limited version with worse quality compared to AliExpress.

    • @ericlee5515
      @ericlee5515 Місяць тому +4

      if your paying 2 dollars for something that should cost 20 I don't know what you expected.

  • @runnanyoung9572
    @runnanyoung9572 Місяць тому +47

    Also adding to the point, China is a massive country. Even when it's manufacturing sector is transitioning to high-end, many older factories are still in operation, with workers from even more rural areas of the country. Yet the Chinese economy is not high in consumption, so it means it can't really digest all these manufacturing power itself, relying on exporting, be it both in high-quality export, low-quality export, even exporting infrastructure projects with African countries.

  • @vacatiolibertas
    @vacatiolibertas Місяць тому +42

    1:25 the reasons that China didn't infustrialize in the same way that Europe did are far more complex and numberable than so-called"national pride", especially since Chinese nationalism didn't really arise until the late 19th century. This is lazy.

    • @rightwingsafetysquad9872
      @rightwingsafetysquad9872 Місяць тому +8

      National pride might not be quite the correct way to phrase it. More like arrogance. China absolutely was semi-isolationist. And by the time they may have wanted to join the rest of the world they were so far behind they were completely dominated by other empires.

    • @AlexanderVatov
      @AlexanderVatov Місяць тому +9

      They should have said "a policy of isolationism". A big reason for this was mistrust of Western powers (which was not unfounded: just look at the Opium Wars).

    • @jonathanstern99
      @jonathanstern99 Місяць тому +1

      Yeah and also the entire premise of “china has more than one kind of company? Crazy” premise is ridiculous. Also blows past the Chinese tech sector. Aliviaba, Xiaomi, baidu etc

    • @rightwingsafetysquad9872
      @rightwingsafetysquad9872 Місяць тому +3

      @@AlexanderVatov China lost the Opium Wars *because of* the isolationism. They may have been right to mistrust foreign powers, but cutting themselves off is why they fell too far behind to defend themselves.

  • @krazykkarl
    @krazykkarl Місяць тому +13

    "We sold out our middle class so China could have one."

    • @Lvvcassss
      @Lvvcassss 12 днів тому +2

      China does not have middle class...not anymore.

  • @MrWhangdoodles
    @MrWhangdoodles 20 днів тому +4

    I understand wanting to look sophisticated and using a chessboard helps with that, but moving the king like that, while saying "chess grandmaster" makes you look a fool.

  • @gooply
    @gooply Місяць тому +11

    we need to bring back the SILENCE, BRAND meme

  • @masterofktulu
    @masterofktulu Місяць тому +3

    3:16 "started as a small fishing village" shows picture of 50,000 people in a densly populated city of the time. 😅

  • @francischang
    @francischang Місяць тому +6

    "kinda kept to themselves and pretty much missed out on the entire industrial revolution"
    You're skipping out on a lot of wars, invasions, annexations and subjugation by foreign powers in your story. Look up "century of humiliation" for an overview of what happened in China between then and the overthrowing of the Kuomintang.

  • @andrewwimberly2225
    @andrewwimberly2225 Місяць тому +34

    Skip to 8 minute mark

  • @nelswolf
    @nelswolf Місяць тому +2

    To be fair, this is exactly what Korea went through

  • @yurydmorales
    @yurydmorales 18 днів тому +1

    - 0:00🏭 China's dominance in manufacturing extends from cheap goods to high-quality tech, reflected in the ubiquitous "Made in China" label.
    - 1:51🌱 Deng Xiaoping's economic reforms in the late 1970s propelled China's shift towards capitalism and foreign investment, laying the groundwork for its manufacturing prowess.
    - 3:48🌐 China's accession to the World Trade Organization in 2001 marked a significant milestone in its integration into the global economy and trade.
    - 5:19💡 China's subsequent focus on technology innovation and quality control, especially post-2005, solidified its position as a global manufacturing powerhouse.
    - 7:03🚀 China's ambitious "Made in China 2025" initiative underscores its determination to lead in high-end manufacturing and technology innovation.
    - 9:10💸 The "de minimis rule" facilitated China's export boom, allowing cheap products to flood the US market, but faces scrutiny and potential revision.
    - 10:43🔀 China's economic landscape sees competition from emerging manufacturing hubs like Mexico and India, challenging its position as the world's manufacturing leader.

  • @Just4Kixs
    @Just4Kixs Місяць тому +3

    India is getting there... Mexico is definitely taking note

    • @armchairwarrior963
      @armchairwarrior963 2 години тому

      India is not getting there. Vietnam and Mexico are better bets. Vietnam for everyone and Mexico for Americas. Long story short. India is anti foreigner investments and entrench local politics. That doesn't want to rock the local businesses.

  • @Random9_
    @Random9_ Місяць тому +75

    Apple just announced they are shifting close to 50% of their manufacturing to India over the next few years

    • @Tdzzz450
      @Tdzzz450 Місяць тому +16

      Source?

    • @manhoosnick
      @manhoosnick Місяць тому +14

      Iphones will smell bad 😞

    • @kart182
      @kart182 Місяць тому +4

      China is moving upmarket

    • @WildDisease72
      @WildDisease72 Місяць тому +8

      India is terrible at labor tho.. they dont manufacture anything good for us rn

    • @shazmosushi
      @shazmosushi Місяць тому +16

      There's no source that Apple announced this. Some analysts like Digitimes' Luke Lin predict 50% by 2027. But that's very different to an official announcement.

  • @armchairwarrior963
    @armchairwarrior963 2 години тому

    Vietnam not India that is getting all the exports. Mexico for the American market.

  • @buzzlightyear3715
    @buzzlightyear3715 Місяць тому +6

    Apple did not outsource manufacturing to China. Apple used Foxconn as contract manufacturing. Because of the cheaper labor and trainable workforce, and semi supply chain, Foxconn decided to build plants in China, not other places.

    • @jennalee2452
      @jennalee2452 Місяць тому +8

      Paying another company to produce product is still called outsourcing and Foxconn is a Taiwanese company though

  • @selkissun6270
    @selkissun6270 Місяць тому +1

    Wow imagine if China got a Mos 2.0

  • @JakeSDN
    @JakeSDN Місяць тому

    Another thing this video fails to mention is that the shipping "discount" is put in place for countries classified as 3rd world countries in order to help them succeed in the global market. China keeps fighting efforts to re-classify it. Also to make a quality product in China, takes a lot of work. Companies spend a lot of time sending their people to factory to ensure every step is done correctly. Apple learn that the hard way. Factory keep trying to cur corners.

  • @user-ei7ed6zy9k
    @user-ei7ed6zy9k 18 днів тому

    Noticing the Tottenham kit in your wardrobe. COME ON YOU SPURS

  • @yagoaraujo6383
    @yagoaraujo6383 Місяць тому

    amazing vídeo ! congrats guys

  • @lemonboiyoutube
    @lemonboiyoutube Місяць тому +6

    y'all have to recognise this is way oversimplified. it's kinda lazy, often misleading, and outright wrong sometimes, so take it all with a grain of salt. it's obviously only meant to be a layman's summary of china, although i would've liked that to be more clear.

    • @TheSongwritingCat
      @TheSongwritingCat 2 дні тому

      I think they did a decent job considering the video is 12 minutes long.

    • @lemonboiyoutube
      @lemonboiyoutube 15 годин тому

      @@TheSongwritingCat yea but it shouldn't be 12 minutes long. like, the logical extreme is you shouldn't make "the history of racism explained in 1 minute", no matter how good that 1 minute is. idk, just like, a disclaimer somewhere in the vid is probs warranted.

    • @TheSongwritingCat
      @TheSongwritingCat 8 годин тому

      @@lemonboiyoutube Fair. I'm agreeing with you. I just think my expectations were set seeing the video length and understanding the cursory approach of these explainers.

  • @kart182
    @kart182 Місяць тому

    Very well presented

  • @broketostoke
    @broketostoke Місяць тому +10

    Did homie just place the King in the center of the board on first move?

    • @littlered6340
      @littlered6340 19 днів тому

      He also didn't promote from pawn to Queen (or something similar) to show growth, like would have made sense 😅

    • @campandcook3118
      @campandcook3118 12 днів тому

      That's what China tries, promote their cheap electric cars as hight tech. While its just a barely functional copy of products they hardly understand

  • @JakeSDN
    @JakeSDN Місяць тому

    UA-camrs dissatisfied with AD sense payments have had to find other ways to make money on UA-cam.

  • @MrMattie725
    @MrMattie725 21 день тому

    Weird intro lol. Has anyone not noticed that like 15 years ago? :D
    Or was that just not a thing in the US?

  • @davidiscostarica6097
    @davidiscostarica6097 20 днів тому

    This how Japan stared.

    • @campandcook3118
      @campandcook3118 12 днів тому +1

      No, Japan started with education plus corp espionage like the us. They didn't turn out much crap, even their early export camera lenses were top notch quality instead of the cheapest option in the shelf.

  • @kylorokx1552
    @kylorokx1552 Місяць тому +2

    I Smell Chinese propaganda very much

  • @epinephrinsr71
    @epinephrinsr71 Місяць тому +2

    How many things do you guys own that's made in America?

  • @aussiemadlad
    @aussiemadlad Місяць тому

    True

  • @b1walker
    @b1walker Місяць тому +4

    Yikes! There's a fair bit in this video that's overly simplistic. This sounds like it was written with a 2012 perspective - before the debt, malinvestment, and property crises took hold. I don't think looking at Temu or BYD through that lens is helpful to understanding what is currently going on.

  • @shaggyantman4523
    @shaggyantman4523 Місяць тому +2

    "Some political aspects of China that have caused headaches" is such a brutal understatement that it gave me a headache.

  • @RemotHuman
    @RemotHuman Місяць тому +1

    Is this video sponsored by China?

  • @mrfishypep
    @mrfishypep Місяць тому +2

    Christ, please never refer to farmers as 'agricultural influencers' again.

  • @histijoe183
    @histijoe183 Місяць тому +11

    Good video but that is not how you pronounce Temu

    • @gooply
      @gooply Місяць тому +1

      probably because this channel is a giant running ad for their own product -_- get into peoples recommendeds for free.... scummy

    • @drewmqn
      @drewmqn Місяць тому +2

      To be fair Temu can't decide how to pronounce Temu. I've heard ads for them with Teemoo and Tehmoo.

    • @TheDoomer666
      @TheDoomer666 Місяць тому +1

      ​@@drewmqnit's the second one, the ones mispronouncing it are always 'influencers'

  • @nickfromm5315
    @nickfromm5315 Місяць тому +1

    this video is odd

  • @chaeju106
    @chaeju106 Місяць тому +4

    i am sorry to say but you failed to explain the most fundamental reason why china has always price competitiveness systemically but its pretty understandable since modern economics like the austrian, keynes, classical doesnt really teach this

  • @The_germanArtist
    @The_germanArtist Місяць тому +2

    Made in Germany reigns supreme

    • @Drawperfectcircles
      @Drawperfectcircles Місяць тому

      You a car enthusiast?

    • @mintheman7
      @mintheman7 Місяць тому +3

      Nein. Most German companies such as BASF, VW, etc. are moving majority of their manufacturing out of Germany due to high energy costs.

    • @rightwingsafetysquad9872
      @rightwingsafetysquad9872 Місяць тому +2

      Made in Germany: very high initial quality, very short expected lifespan, very poor value for money. A Cadillac and a Mercedes are equally crap after 5-10 years, but at least the Cadillac only cost half as much to keep on the road. Even industries that the Germans were untouchable in 10 years ago, like optics, are being surpassed by the Japanese.

  • @fatehyabali
    @fatehyabali Місяць тому

    Ab

  • @alessio279
    @alessio279 Місяць тому +6

    This video is written with a very pro-China skew. It's pretty weird.

    • @alessio279
      @alessio279 Місяць тому +3

      It reads like propaganda....

    • @mintheman7
      @mintheman7 Місяць тому +15

      Lol, we are so immersed in anti-China propaganda daily anything that isn’t completely anti-China is considered "pro-China" now. To compete on the world stage, you have to recognize the real capability of your opponents first. The gap in competitiveness between US and China on EV's, solar, electronics manufacturing, etc. is very real and growing wider every day.

    • @DC-wk7yo
      @DC-wk7yo Місяць тому +2

      ​@@mintheman7further technological advances in energy production benefits all of mankind. Unless all you care about is maintaining US global hegemony

    • @mintheman7
      @mintheman7 Місяць тому +2

      @@DC-wk7yo I don’t care about “hegemony” but since US is still the largest economy in the world, a healthy EV, solar, electronics industry in the US will benefit all of mankind. Real competition pressure from US in these industries instead of just protectionist tariff will also foster innovation worldwide. Unfortunately our politicians are too controlled by the fossil fuel and ICE car lobbies to have a coherent national plan.

  • @Shonbon17
    @Shonbon17 Місяць тому +1

    Josh Denny Clone

  • @saultube44
    @saultube44 Місяць тому +4

    Out-manufacturing should be illegal, unless it's too much internal demand.
    The problem with USA is that, they inflate prices way beyond their National economic efficiency point, 'coz their God told them they should be abundant, or some fantastic crap; so, everything si expensive, instead of making everything affordable, so the economy has lots of CA$H Flow and sales are always high, the economy is dynamic and always moving $ which is the important thing, so all business are good, nobody goes broke and new business are guarantee to succeed. Isn't this what everyone wants?

    • @Feeble_cursed_one
      @Feeble_cursed_one Місяць тому +1

      no the ones with all the money want to have more money flowing to them

  • @panama-canada
    @panama-canada Місяць тому

    Just like Japan did once so does China of today.

  • @messwithhelpy
    @messwithhelpy 21 день тому

    sure lets pay more and add more middle men.... what can go wrong?

  • @DjHollwood
    @DjHollwood Місяць тому +1

    Why does this feel like propaganda?

  • @geromesoriano
    @geromesoriano Місяць тому

    feels like chinese propaganda. west philippine sea!

    • @TheDoomer666
      @TheDoomer666 Місяць тому

      yeah, because anything that speaks well of China _'is propaganda boo hoo'_