Yes, he’s personable, intelligent and eloquent. He’s also a liar. I’ve always felt his mental health issues arose from the tension in his own mind, because deep down he knows he has blood on his hands.
I work in the communications industry (though not in political communications) and I totally agree with what Alistair Campbell says here about spin. The media have done a very good job of making the wider public believe a simple story: that PRs are bad and journalists are good. That PRs are engaged in spin while journalists are not. The truth is far more complex than that. Certainly it is true that a PR’s job is to present your client or organisation in the best possible light, and so our communication is inherently biased. But there is just as much, if not more, bias on the side of the media, who are constantly searching for story angles they think their audience will like. Unfortunately, it is very often the case that the truth falls by the wayside in that quest. As a result, PRs are just as often fighting for balance in a story as they are 'spin'. Media get away with this, largely, by holding up as examples the very best in their trade (i.e. the 1% of journalists doing real investigative journalism that genuinely seeks to expose the truth) and pretending that the other 99% of what they do bears any resemblance to this. At the same time, they hold up the very worst examples of PR (i.e. Max Clifford) and pretend that all PRs are like this. It's the very manipulation of the truth that they claim WE as PRs are responsible for. Thus, people really need to remember that Alistair Campbell's reputation as a 'spin doctor' comes from the media itself, who resent the idea of someone else challenging their monopoly on information and framing public debate. They believe, quite sincerely, that they are the only ones who should hold this monopoly. What is really interesting though is that Campbell's relationship with the media during the Blair years is already an outdated model. In 2015, the media now have far less power than they did back when Campbell was battling with them, for the simple reason that they no longer hold the monopoly on how information and news are disseminated. The rise of social media in that time, and more specifically of social media platforms' increasing shift towards a news feed model (it is easy to forget that the likes of Facebook didn’t always do this), has effectively muscled in on editorial media’s own territory. This new competition for readers and influence in turn brought new competition for advertising revenue. With less ad revenue, media have less money to invest in quality journalism (well-sourced, well-researched stories are expensive to acquire) and so the ‘click-bait’ culture has become all pervasive. Instead of relying on their own judgement, online editors now use hard metrics to measure what stories get clicks and what don’t. What have they discovered? The more sensational the headline, the more clicks they get. So guess what they start producing more of. It is not just sensationalism either, that media are turning to, it is also volume. Editors used to be limited by space on a print page, but online that problem no longer exists - they can run as many stories as they like. More stories mean more clicks, more clicks mean more ad revenue. That pressure is then applied to editorial staff who are tasked with writing and publishing more and more stories in any given day. So at a time when editorial staff numbers are shrinking due to lower budgets, they are also being asked to produce more. Inevitably, standards that used to be the benchmark of good journalism - checking your sources, properly researching facts etc - are slipping. And this isn’t just in tabloid media. You can see it creeping in to broadsheet titles like the Telegraph as well (last week they ran a story about the PM visiting a restaurant that was named after a 17th century prostitute….that was it, that was the story!) All of which should make the public very very wary of that simple story they have been sold for years: that PRs spin, while journalists unmask the truth. It simply isn’t true.
+James Kay You are right. People believe journalists that directly pander to their tastes, even in the old traditional print before the 2000s. Journalism tends to reflect what its audience want to hear, not necessarily what actually happens. Alistair is at least up front about it. He is no more evil than the people paint him as evil. Alistair is clearly an intelligent man and has his own opinions while tending to be intolerant of those who disagree with him. He hates those who paint themselves being unbiased when they themselves have biases that they don't recognize. He has a bad temper which IMO, does cross the line at times.
Interesting that he raises the really important topic of journalism also being powerful and sometimes dishonest and arguably having less accountability than politicians, it's good that he's so harsh on that topic because it does indeed get wayyy overlooked as people fixate very much on the hypocrisy and manoeuvring of politicians (due in large part to the narrative and influence set by large media). In other words he presented a slightly biased view but biased in the opposite direction of most of what we're presented daily. The main takeaway for me is that both politicians and journalists can somewhat undermine the democratic will because of the influence they have on people's perception, and those are core flaws of democracies with free press that people need to be maximally aware of if they want to minimize that influence, kinda like how learning about marketing strategies can make you less susceptible to them afterwards.
Would we have gone to war in Iraq if the terms of engagement precluded any closed bid oil contracts and instead offers charitable aid for Iraqis to build their own refinement and oil selling industry as well as a system for fair elections? Nope.
I love that his line early on about keeping the agenda co-ordinated is basically the entire problem with Labour at the moment, splitting right down the middle
He is quite simply lying regarding the dossier. The dossier contained known inaccuracies, and that is why it remains contraversial. Some of the information within contained rumour and innuendo which was presented as fact. I wonder if he would say the same about the dossier these days.
7:37 The media aren't accountable? Really? Firstly, they are accountable to their readers and viewers, whatever Campbell says. Secondly, England has some of the strongest laws against defamation in the entire world. In fact, if you're accused of defamation in England, you have to prove that the statement was true: in other words, for defamation, the burden of proof is reversed. By contrast, politicians are protected by parliamentary privilege.
Maybe but why would he use the actor's name? They're discussing the character? I know its a petty point but there could be that much of a similarity between Mandelson and Tucker.
@@conrade2442 I know it's four years late but Capaldi and Campbell know eachother, they've done charity things together. So he knows him on a first name basis.
guys that is the most dreadful set..so uncomfortable to watch ..get a table for your hands please…and the lighting... i actually had to listen without seeing the screen..
He was the prime minister's press officer 20 years ago. Apart from journalists, a profession completely up its own backside, who cares what he thinks? (not a very safe comment, I expect a WMD is coming to get me in 45 mins.)
He was the most important staffer for a politician who won 3 elections. Love him, hate him, a lot of people will be interested in what he says because he was one of the most important political figures in British politics.
arthur gride= Well said! This is a man if you don't agree with him uses the term " Its people like you" It wouldn't be people like him who stood with Tony Blair and took us into an illegal war Campbell is complicit as Blair.
@@jamesrogers9887 funny thing is you warmongers are the biggest snowflakes and cry babies of the lot. You lot cried about Saddam's wmd, you cried for Assad gassing his own people, you cried for Jessica Lynch, you cry about the Russians and Chinese. You even cried about the likes of Guatemala or North Korea being a credible threat to western security. Your cry baby antics are based on being brainwashed by newspapers and fake news, then calling every one else a cry baby for not falling for your rotten propaganda
Why did the police stop looking for the murders of Jill Dando & Doctor Kelly because Dave Stewart Annie Lennox and Tony & Cherie Blair had something to loose stolen children and Royalties for songs The Miracle of Love and Here Comes the rain again, from Michael Boyers, their friends responsible for carrying out the murders including the murder of Michael Boyers son, with a former police officer Janet MacKenzie who's ex husband Rob MacKenzie is one of the gang members responsible for the murders of Jill Dando, Doctor Kelly my son and none other than Princess Diana and Dodi Al Fayed, the ring leaders are Ian Henry, Mi5 and the CIA same people, Grant Tully, Terry Boyers, Ian Henry has amusement arcades in the Newcastle Wallsend area, that pay for the murders including the murder of his former brother in law Peter Gowling, shot in the head in front of Ian Henry by Russell Bonalie who's mate Norman Massey shot Jill Dando in the head, at the time Massey had a remarkable resemblance to Barry George and was working as a chauffeur, drug dealer and ponce for members of Parliament and QCs and claims Tony Blair was one of his best customers, he also did not deny shooting Jill Dando on two occasions that he tried to befriend me in Newcastle City Centre having known him as a teenager, other gang members George Tully along with Stan Henry and Alan Duncan boat builder murdered Ilene MacDougal better known as the Torso in the Tank 1978, the murder of a 17 year old innocent girl that Jill Dando was investigating as one of two unsolved murders, thee other from 1967 Angus Sibbet also murdered by Stan Henry former amusement arcade and casino and nightclub owner now in the health club business formally known as Springs. who’s daughter Kay Henry Gowling, was having an incestuous relationship with her father leading to her insanity, she thinks she and her incestuous family can get off with trying to murder me and the murder of my son with former police woman Janet Mackenzie, who’s husband Rob, along with Ian Henry, Grant tully, Russel Bonalie, Joe Bonalie, Santos Cuscanni, Alan Rankin, Bob Senior, Mike Emerson, Ian Jenkins, Sylvia Cutter, Ernie Cutter,, Dave Stewart, Annie Lennox, Eddy Fenwick, Charlie Gray, Terry Boyers, Joe Boyers, Barry Cubby, Tommy Stuart jnr & Snr, Alan Dag, Colin Hume, and Patrick Terence Thompson, one of the drivers of the white vans seen stalking Jill Dando, and Peter Gowling, The Met never followed up on the leads, so as to help the Blairs get off with child abduction, Katharine Blair is my daughter and not Tony Blairs, Pedophile Billy Blair along with his family are targeting me via Newcastle Social Services, controlled by Adulteress and incestuous pedophile Cherie Blair, who lied to me to get me to have sex with her, then stole my daughter Katharine, and tried to have me murdered on a number of occasions here and in America and Australia The Blairs and Stan Torso in the tank Henry the murder of Angus Sibbet 1967. Michael Lavaglio and Denis Stafford got the blame with the help of the corrupt Masonic police, who also covered up the murder by Stan Henry, George Tully, Bill Duncan, Ernie Clark and Alan Duncan so called worthy master covered up by bent copper Brian MacKenzie, and Micky Hafferty Stan Henrys bent coppers, Ian Henry MI5, CIA, Mossad, George and Grant Tully, Alan Duncan and their gang, includes drivers Gary Pern, Norman Massey, Patrick Thompson, Rob MacKenzie the murder of my son, the gang involved paid weekly visits to Paris warehouses for booze and cigarettes, Guns & Drugs, travelling from Sunderland at times 3 white vans were being used at each murder, these scum, were in those white vans at the scene of the crimes aforesaid mentioned, James Andanson told the Police he could not get near Diana, because of the white vans in front of him and in front of Diana and Dodis car the one in front of Dodi he said had a motor bike strapped in and someone sitting on it shining the head light on main beam into Dodis car, Ian Henry MI6, was the one on the Motorbike that Reece Jones remembers pulling along side him before the crash causing the crash he thought they were paparazzi, you can see the last photo taken was taken from a higher vantage point than a normal car, Andanson also said that their were paparazzi hanging onto straps taking photo’s The cameras used by some of them were burnt in a car at the back of a pub in Low fell, North East England, leased by gang member Jeffery Verrel and partner West indian Albert Harding who claims to be a friend of Paul Burrel, Jeff Verrel set fire to his own car and claimed the compensation for the cameras as well, local newspapers confirm the incident, Verrel is still walking free, he is a friend of Blair, Darling, Milburn, Mullen, David and Edward Milliband and Gordon Brown all members of the same Pedophile Ring as these aforesaid mentioned other criminals that The Met have still to arrest, i have given you all the names of the ring leaders i have named the ones who carried out the murders and the ones who covered up for the murders, all though they did try to arrest Blair on two occasions but were sent away with their tails between their legs, diplomatic immunity The Met have yet to follow up on any of these leads that i have sent them and spoken to them and the FBI about shortly after reading about the Murders. bent coppers Micky Hafferty and Brian MacKenzie covered up for their friends, and were promoted, Billy Blair qc quietly covered up all the murders with a 70 year press ban.
Lol. This little boy doesn't realise he is stuck in his own immature journalistic paradigm. Didn't really register or reflect on a thing Campbell said. Most went right over his head!
Labour misses someone like Campbell.
We do need someone like him in the system instead of all the lies we are told.
@@vanwin5415 Because Campbell never lied did he? Come on, talk some sense.
Annoyingly, I actually quite like Campbell.
You are easily conned by people then.
mikeyo1234 Or you are easily conned into thinking what the papers tell you to think
I have some shares in Theranos for you
@@mikeyo1234 I don't trust him nor do I agree with his politics but I can't help but like him.
Yes, he’s personable, intelligent and eloquent. He’s also a liar. I’ve always felt his mental health issues arose from the tension in his own mind, because deep down he knows he has blood on his hands.
I work in the communications industry (though not in political communications) and I totally agree with what Alistair Campbell says here about spin. The media have done a very good job of making the wider public believe a simple story: that PRs are bad and journalists are good. That PRs are engaged in spin while journalists are not.
The truth is far more complex than that.
Certainly it is true that a PR’s job is to present your client or organisation in the best possible light, and so our communication is inherently biased. But there is just as much, if not more, bias on the side of the media, who are constantly searching for story angles they think their audience will like. Unfortunately, it is very often the case that the truth falls by the wayside in that quest. As a result, PRs are just as often fighting for balance in a story as they are 'spin'.
Media get away with this, largely, by holding up as examples the very best in their trade (i.e. the 1% of journalists doing real investigative journalism that genuinely seeks to expose the truth) and pretending that the other 99% of what they do bears any resemblance to this. At the same time, they hold up the very worst examples of PR (i.e. Max Clifford) and pretend that all PRs are like this. It's the very manipulation of the truth that they claim WE as PRs are responsible for.
Thus, people really need to remember that Alistair Campbell's reputation as a 'spin doctor' comes from the media itself, who resent the idea of someone else challenging their monopoly on information and framing public debate. They believe, quite sincerely, that they are the only ones who should hold this monopoly.
What is really interesting though is that Campbell's relationship with the media during the Blair years is already an outdated model.
In 2015, the media now have far less power than they did back when Campbell was battling with them, for the simple reason that they no longer hold the monopoly on how information and news are disseminated.
The rise of social media in that time, and more specifically of social media platforms' increasing shift towards a news feed model (it is easy to forget that the likes of Facebook didn’t always do this), has effectively muscled in on editorial media’s own territory.
This new competition for readers and influence in turn brought new competition for advertising revenue.
With less ad revenue, media have less money to invest in quality journalism (well-sourced, well-researched stories are expensive to acquire) and so the ‘click-bait’ culture has become all pervasive.
Instead of relying on their own judgement, online editors now use hard metrics to measure what stories get clicks and what don’t. What have they discovered? The more sensational the headline, the more clicks they get. So guess what they start producing more of.
It is not just sensationalism either, that media are turning to, it is also volume. Editors used to be limited by space on a print page, but online that problem no longer exists - they can run as many stories as they like. More stories mean more clicks, more clicks mean more ad revenue. That pressure is then applied to editorial staff who are tasked with writing and publishing more and more stories in any given day. So at a time when editorial staff numbers are shrinking due to lower budgets, they are also being asked to produce more.
Inevitably, standards that used to be the benchmark of good journalism - checking your sources, properly researching facts etc - are slipping.
And this isn’t just in tabloid media. You can see it creeping in to broadsheet titles like the Telegraph as well (last week they ran a story about the PM visiting a restaurant that was named after a 17th century prostitute….that was it, that was the story!)
All of which should make the public very very wary of that simple story they have been sold for years: that PRs spin, while journalists unmask the truth.
It simply isn’t true.
James Kay enjoyed reading this
James Kay Thanks for that insight.
James Kay Really fascinating thoughts. Far too sophisticated for youtube; they deserve greater attention.
+James Kay You are right. People believe journalists that directly pander to their tastes, even in the old traditional print before the 2000s. Journalism tends to reflect what its audience want to hear, not necessarily what actually happens. Alistair is at least up front about it. He is no more evil than the people paint him as evil. Alistair is clearly an intelligent man and has his own opinions while tending to be intolerant of those who disagree with him. He hates those who paint themselves being unbiased when they themselves have biases that they don't recognize. He has a bad temper which IMO, does cross the line at times.
+James Kay This must be just about the most intelligent and well reasoned comment I've ever read on UA-cam. I entirely agree as well
Great interview. Thought the interviewer did really well to bring out interesting discussion.
Campbell didn't seem as bad as he's often made out to be.
Alex Kirkham You should read his diaries. He's really not as bad as people make out.
Maybe he's more aggressive in the workplace, than to the public?
Most people aren't as bad as they are made out to be.
Really? So his own diaries made him look good?
How unusual.
Love the filter on this. Another great interview. Well done.
The tie game is on point in this video
Also it would be like if in the description you could put time stamps of when each topic is discussed.
Hi Skufed - cheers for the suggestion. We've now added the topics of discussion and their times to the description of the video.
Thank you
This is set up like a Francis Bacon painting
Very impressive performance from both gentleman
18:11 hurt me in good way
Interesting that he raises the really important topic of journalism also being powerful and sometimes dishonest and arguably having less accountability than politicians, it's good that he's so harsh on that topic because it does indeed get wayyy overlooked as people fixate very much on the hypocrisy and manoeuvring of politicians (due in large part to the narrative and influence set by large media). In other words he presented a slightly biased view but biased in the opposite direction of most of what we're presented daily.
The main takeaway for me is that both politicians and journalists can somewhat undermine the democratic will because of the influence they have on people's perception, and those are core flaws of democracies with free press that people need to be maximally aware of if they want to minimize that influence, kinda like how learning about marketing strategies can make you less susceptible to them afterwards.
Would we have gone to war in Iraq if the terms of engagement precluded any closed bid oil contracts and instead offers charitable aid for Iraqis to build their own refinement and oil selling industry as well as a system for fair elections? Nope.
Credit to the interviewer, this was very interesting.
Great questions
I love that his line early on about keeping the agenda co-ordinated is basically the entire problem with Labour at the moment, splitting right down the middle
The thick of it?....Blair's Liar-in-Chief was certainly in the thick of it, it's called BS.
who is the interviewer?
He is quite simply lying regarding the dossier. The dossier contained known inaccuracies, and that is why it remains contraversial. Some of the information within contained rumour and innuendo which was presented as fact. I wonder if he would say the same about the dossier these days.
But he comes across as truthful and on point for most of the rest of the interview.
It was well time somebody spoke up about Brexshit. Well done sir.
Tbh, you make it sound like no one has spoken out about brexit. The reality is people have been speaking about it, with their spin, for 7 years.
7:37 The media aren't accountable? Really? Firstly, they are accountable to their readers and viewers, whatever Campbell says. Secondly, England has some of the strongest laws against defamation in the entire world. In fact, if you're accused of defamation in England, you have to prove that the statement was true: in other words, for defamation, the burden of proof is reversed. By contrast, politicians are protected by parliamentary privilege.
Lol
Hello and welcome to hand jive time.
Of course the Iraq war was controversial after the event because that's when we found out that you lied about wmds.
Sadam Hussein without WMD would be just another dictator. Of course it was all about WMD, Alastair, and you know it.
intentional Freudian slip or not? 12.23
I hate it when the interviewer keeps cutting Alistair off at the end of his sentence. It's annoying!
At 12:23 he nearly says 'Peter' as in Peter Mandelson rather than 'Malcolm Tucker.' Strange.
I think he actually was going to say 'Peter Capaldi' (who plays Malcolm Tucker).
Maybe but why would he use the actor's name? They're discussing the character? I know its a petty point but there could be that much of a similarity between Mandelson and Tucker.
@@conrade2442 I know it's four years late but Capaldi and Campbell know eachother, they've done charity things together. So he knows him on a first name basis.
this guy needs to read a little bit more Hayek and Acton
Malcolm Tucker
War criminal.
guys that is the most dreadful set..so uncomfortable to watch ..get a table for your hands please…and the lighting... i actually had to listen without seeing the screen..
He was the prime minister's press officer 20 years ago. Apart from journalists, a profession completely up its own backside, who cares what he thinks? (not a very safe comment, I expect a WMD is coming to get me in 45 mins.)
He was the most important staffer for a politician who won 3 elections. Love him, hate him, a lot of people will be interested in what he says because he was one of the most important political figures in British politics.
arthur gride= Well said! This is a man if you don't agree with him uses the term
" Its people like you" It wouldn't be people like him who stood with Tony Blair and took us into an illegal war Campbell is complicit as Blair.
So he started this interview by spinning about spin 😂😂
hes 100% correct though. Journalists are spinning as much as the political press guys.
State of the interviewers shoes man 😖
What
He should be explaining to the Hague but instead he explains to weak journalists.
robert ely cry some more
@@jamesrogers9887 funny thing is you warmongers are the biggest snowflakes and cry babies of the lot.
You lot cried about Saddam's wmd, you cried for Assad gassing his own people, you cried for Jessica Lynch, you cry about the Russians and Chinese.
You even cried about the likes of Guatemala or North Korea being a credible threat to western security.
Your cry baby antics are based on being brainwashed by newspapers and fake news, then calling every one else a cry baby for not falling for your rotten propaganda
Toss pot
Why did the police stop looking for the murders of Jill Dando & Doctor Kelly because Dave Stewart Annie Lennox and Tony & Cherie Blair had something to loose stolen children and Royalties for songs The Miracle of Love and Here Comes the rain again, from Michael Boyers, their friends responsible for carrying out the murders including the murder of Michael Boyers son, with a former police officer Janet MacKenzie who's ex husband Rob MacKenzie is one of the gang members responsible for the murders of Jill Dando, Doctor Kelly my son and none other than Princess Diana and Dodi Al Fayed, the ring leaders are Ian Henry, Mi5 and the CIA same people, Grant Tully, Terry Boyers, Ian Henry has amusement arcades in the Newcastle Wallsend area, that pay for the murders including the murder of his former brother in law Peter Gowling, shot in the head in front of Ian Henry by Russell Bonalie who's mate Norman Massey shot Jill Dando in the head, at the time Massey had a remarkable resemblance to Barry George and was working as a chauffeur, drug dealer and ponce for members of Parliament and QCs and claims Tony Blair was one of his best customers, he also did not deny shooting Jill Dando on two occasions that he tried to befriend me in Newcastle City Centre having known him as a teenager, other gang members George Tully along with Stan Henry and Alan Duncan boat builder murdered Ilene MacDougal better known as the Torso in the Tank 1978, the murder of a 17 year old innocent girl that Jill Dando was investigating as one of two unsolved murders, thee other from 1967 Angus Sibbet also murdered by Stan Henry former amusement arcade and casino and nightclub owner now in the health club business formally known as Springs. who’s daughter Kay Henry Gowling, was having an incestuous relationship with her father leading to her insanity, she thinks she and her incestuous family can get off with trying to murder me and the murder of my son with former police woman Janet Mackenzie, who’s husband Rob, along with Ian Henry, Grant tully, Russel Bonalie, Joe Bonalie, Santos Cuscanni, Alan Rankin, Bob Senior, Mike Emerson, Ian Jenkins, Sylvia Cutter, Ernie Cutter,, Dave Stewart, Annie Lennox, Eddy Fenwick, Charlie Gray, Terry Boyers, Joe Boyers, Barry Cubby, Tommy Stuart jnr & Snr, Alan Dag, Colin Hume, and Patrick Terence Thompson, one of the drivers of the white vans seen stalking Jill Dando, and Peter Gowling,
The Met never followed up on the leads, so as to help the Blairs get off with child abduction, Katharine Blair is my daughter and not Tony Blairs, Pedophile Billy Blair along with his family are targeting me via Newcastle Social Services, controlled by Adulteress and incestuous pedophile Cherie Blair, who lied to me to get me to have sex with her, then stole my daughter Katharine, and tried to have me murdered on a number of occasions here and in America and Australia
The Blairs and Stan Torso in the tank Henry the murder of Angus Sibbet 1967. Michael Lavaglio and Denis Stafford got the blame with the help of the corrupt Masonic police, who also covered up the murder by Stan Henry, George Tully, Bill Duncan, Ernie Clark and Alan Duncan so called worthy master covered up by bent copper Brian MacKenzie, and Micky Hafferty Stan Henrys bent coppers, Ian Henry MI5, CIA, Mossad, George and Grant Tully, Alan Duncan and their gang, includes drivers Gary Pern, Norman Massey, Patrick Thompson, Rob MacKenzie the murder of my son, the gang involved paid weekly visits to Paris warehouses for booze and cigarettes, Guns & Drugs, travelling from Sunderland at times 3 white vans were being used at each murder, these scum, were in those white vans at the scene of the crimes aforesaid mentioned, James Andanson told the Police he could not get near Diana, because of the white vans in front of him and in front of Diana and Dodis car the one in front of Dodi he said had a motor bike strapped in and someone sitting on it shining the head light on main beam into Dodis car, Ian Henry MI6, was the one on the Motorbike that Reece Jones remembers pulling along side him before the crash causing the crash he thought they were paparazzi, you can see the last photo taken was taken from a higher vantage point than a normal car, Andanson also said that their were paparazzi hanging onto straps taking photo’s The cameras used by some of them were burnt in a car at the back of a pub in Low fell, North East England, leased by gang member Jeffery Verrel and partner West indian Albert Harding who claims to be a friend of Paul Burrel, Jeff Verrel set fire to his own car and claimed the compensation for the cameras as well, local newspapers confirm the incident, Verrel is still walking free, he is a friend of Blair, Darling, Milburn, Mullen, David and Edward Milliband and Gordon Brown all members of the same Pedophile Ring as these aforesaid mentioned other criminals that The Met have still to arrest, i have given you all the names of the ring leaders i have named the ones who carried out the murders and the ones who covered up for the murders, all though they did try to arrest Blair on two occasions but were sent away with their tails between their legs, diplomatic immunity The Met have yet to follow up on any of these leads that i have sent them and spoken to them and the FBI about shortly after reading about the Murders. bent coppers Micky Hafferty and Brian MacKenzie covered up for their friends, and were promoted, Billy Blair qc quietly covered up all the murders with a 70 year press ban.
He sounds VERY disingenuous.
politics IS spin brah
Its a dirty business, and not just for the money. Certain people are attracted to politics.
No justice in the world when this awful specimen is still on the loose.
Lol. This little boy doesn't realise he is stuck in his own immature journalistic paradigm. Didn't really register or reflect on a thing Campbell said. Most went right over his head!