What a lively and fun, interesting this interview is! The two greats.~ Roger Federer and Lleyton Hewitt. I’ve had a big time enjoying your video. Thank you for the post. Appreciated.
The last three slams Roger won were a joke. He hardly played anyone and he beat Nadal in the final where Nadal was up 3-1 in the fifth. Nadal had one less day rest after his semifinal. These players have all dropped out of the top 8 in the past year Andy Murray, Novak Djockovic, Stanislas Wawrinka, Tomas Berdych, Joe Wilfred-Tsonga. They are now all ranked outside the top 20 in one years time from injuries. First, I think that's fake. It is utterly impossible to have 5 top 5 players drop out within a year or so. Milos Raonic has done nothing. Kei Nishikori got injured last year. The younger players who aren't that young haven't done much. Roger played two qualifiers in the first two rounds of the 2017 AO when he was a 17 seed. Never seen that in a GS. This year in the AO all his matches were played at night to avoid the immense heat the other players indured. Tomas Berdych cleared out del Potro and Fognini and Hueon Chung, a guy who has done nothing before or after played Roger in the semifinals and even retired. And Cilic is good but not great. Marin Cilic was outside the top 20 for years before his drug ban. He shouldn't even be playing. And that final went 5 sets with Cilic a chance to break early after Roger's bathroom break. So tennis has been wretched the padt two years here. Roger won 13 slams from 2003-2007. Only Andy Roddick got to the semifinals more than 2 times of all the players at that time in those 5 years. Roger can't take up 4 spots at once every slam. Those players were inconsistent and that is proof. The era Ivan Lendl played was the best. Multiple GS winners and consistency abound. And there were multiple grear grass, clay, and hard court players in that era. Ivan Lendl will always be the best. 8 consecutive US Open finals. 9 consecutive year-end finals. 5 years of a winning percentage of 90% or better. Owned the head to head against most of those great players. And Lendl played for 16 years reaching 94 tournament wins and over 1000 match wins in less time than it took Roger. Roger has 98 tournament wins and it took over 20 years and the over 1000 wins too. And there was no let up for Lendl from beginning to end. From Bjorg in the late 70's to early 80's to Sampras in the mid 90's when Lendl retired. And again Lendl owned the head to head against almost all of them. Just to give you an idea how good that era was, Vitas Gulerrmo won over 900 matches and never a slam. Illie Nastase win the year-end 4 times but is lesser known than McEnroe, Connors, Becker, Wilander, Edberg. There are many more consistencies to point out. Roger is a paper champion. He won 13 before Nadal Djockovic and Murray hit their primes and he never beat Nadal and Djockovic in a GS final when they were 21 to 30 years old each. Nadal never lost Federer on clay yet not only beat Federer at Wimbeldon in the final on grass, but the other he lost went 5 sets with two tie-breakers so that match could have gone either way. And the 2009 Wimbeldon, Roddick didn't get broken all match till the last game of the 5th set. Tie-breakers. Roddick missed an open court put away at the net at set point in the breaker to go up 2-0. Imagine having win 12 or 13 GS and playing a guy who has won 0 like say Andy Murray at the time. Who is the pressure on? And Britain hadn't had a male tennis player win in many years. That was 3 more of Roger's GSs. Lendl is the best. And Lendl coached Andy Murray to two Wimbeldon titles and a US title after he couldn't win one. As well as two gold medals beating Roger along the way. No one else really did that well in such a short time of coaching in many years. And if Roger had to use a wooden racket and not have millions in the bank and do Swiss Alpine training which should be illegal according to the rules of the ITF.
What a lively and fun, interesting this interview is!
The two greats.~ Roger Federer and Lleyton Hewitt.
I’ve had a big time enjoying your video.
Thank you for the post. Appreciated.
Nice blokes. Some talent with massive amounts hard work and dedication paid off for Lleyton and Roger.
These two are my favourite tennis players!!!! They have achieve so much!!
Same I love these guys
Hard to disagree.
I love listening to this two great tennis player, 2015 seems like the old interviews but it’s interesting to listened to Roger Federer and Hewitt!
Roger is so funny it's unfair.
What a discussion. Thanks for the upload.
Two great players
I absolutely love Roger Federer .
Funniest Fed interview I've seen in years. =)
This is my favourite interview😹
Good memories! I also like Hewitt's shoes.
I think both are winner
at 8:58 Lleyton said something important. The answer why they could play tennis at this level are their wifes.
Facing Hewitt and Facing Federer books at amazon books!
Roger is so funny lol
Roger: "Sorry"
Love u lleyton ♥️
I didn't get what the question was either. Even after he clarified it he still didn't ask a question.
Tim McFly He didn't ask a question so i agree. It was a dumb "question".
where are our juniors trying to push out the old guys now?
+Arthur Yagami Playing on the PS3 and smoking weed
Charmers.
Cool interview but I hate this format trying to turn tennis T20.
The last three slams Roger won were a joke. He hardly played anyone and he beat Nadal in the final where Nadal was up 3-1 in the fifth. Nadal had one less day rest after his semifinal. These players have all dropped out of the top 8 in the past year Andy Murray, Novak Djockovic, Stanislas Wawrinka, Tomas Berdych, Joe Wilfred-Tsonga. They are now all ranked outside the top 20 in one years time from injuries. First, I think that's fake. It is utterly impossible to have 5 top 5 players drop out within a year or so. Milos Raonic has done nothing. Kei Nishikori got injured last year. The younger players who aren't that young haven't done much. Roger played two qualifiers in the first two rounds of the 2017 AO when he was a 17 seed. Never seen that in a GS. This year in the AO all his matches were played at night to avoid the immense heat the other players indured. Tomas Berdych cleared out del Potro and Fognini and Hueon Chung, a guy who has done nothing before or after played Roger in the semifinals and even retired. And Cilic is good but not great. Marin Cilic was outside the top 20 for years before his drug ban. He shouldn't even be playing. And that final went 5 sets with Cilic a chance to break early after Roger's bathroom break. So tennis has been wretched the padt two years here. Roger won 13 slams from 2003-2007. Only Andy Roddick got to the semifinals more than 2 times of all the players at that time in those 5 years. Roger can't take up 4 spots at once every slam. Those players were inconsistent and that is proof. The era Ivan Lendl played was the best. Multiple GS winners and consistency abound. And there were multiple grear grass, clay, and hard court players in that era. Ivan Lendl will always be the best. 8 consecutive US Open finals. 9 consecutive year-end finals. 5 years of a winning percentage of 90% or better. Owned the head to head against most of those great players. And Lendl played for 16 years reaching 94 tournament wins and over 1000 match wins in less time than it took Roger. Roger has 98 tournament wins and it took over 20 years and the over 1000 wins too. And there was no let up for Lendl from beginning to end. From Bjorg in the late 70's to early 80's to Sampras in the mid 90's when Lendl retired. And again Lendl owned the head to head against almost all of them. Just to give you an idea how good that era was, Vitas Gulerrmo won over 900 matches and never a slam. Illie Nastase win the year-end 4 times but is lesser known than McEnroe, Connors, Becker, Wilander, Edberg. There are many more consistencies to point out. Roger is a paper champion. He won 13 before Nadal Djockovic and Murray hit their primes and he never beat Nadal and Djockovic in a GS final when they were 21 to 30 years old each. Nadal never lost Federer on clay yet not only beat Federer at Wimbeldon in the final on grass, but the other he lost went 5 sets with two tie-breakers so that match could have gone either way. And the 2009 Wimbeldon, Roddick didn't get broken all match till the last game of the 5th set. Tie-breakers. Roddick missed an open court put away at the net at set point in the breaker to go up 2-0. Imagine having win 12 or 13 GS and playing a guy who has won 0 like say Andy Murray at the time. Who is the pressure on? And Britain hadn't had a male tennis player win in many years. That was 3 more of Roger's GSs. Lendl is the best. And Lendl coached Andy Murray to two Wimbeldon titles and a US title after he couldn't win one. As well as two gold medals beating Roger along the way. No one else really did that well in such a short time of coaching in many years. And if Roger had to use a wooden racket and not have millions in the bank and do Swiss Alpine training which should be illegal according to the rules of the ITF.
Fuck you.
Lol. Twat