▶ Comparison of Back To The Future 4K (4K DI) Dolby Vision vs Regular Version
Вставка
- Опубліковано 15 жов 2020
- 4K, HDR Conversion, Music Re-mixed, Logo & Montage by Score Man from The3hirdEye PRODUCTION®
===================================================================
Music By Alan Silvestri
===================================================================
Technical Specifications: www.imdb.com/title/tt0088763/...
===================================================================
Amazon (US): www.amazon.com/Back-to-the-Fu... - Фільми й анімація
Jennifer from Back to the future 1 was freaking hot
so way better then the jennifer in the second one
@@FSUSean2112 Elizabeth Shue always seemed weird. It's not her fault she had to step in someone else's part.
@@Aaron-ox8ye yea ik
@@Aaron-ox8ye wonder why she had to leave
@@FSUSean2112 had to take care of her mother
Definitely looks more detailed & natural in 4K! ✨
For a while I had a tough time spotting any differences beyond an upgrade in resolution.
01:59 The transition here is where I finally noticed an easy to spot difference between the discs. The light shining off Marty's guitar pick is much more clear on the 4K.
4:14 The wrinkles and imperfections on the actors' faces comes through on the 4K. Whether or not that's a good thing is up to the watcher.
7:57 The glowing neon tubes on the Delorian Time Machine are more clear on the 4K.
14:16 The bright exhaust from the thrusters on the Time Machine is washed-out on the Blu-ray while being crystal clear on the 4K. The higher color depth of HDR is a significant help when it comes to depicting things that shine on screen.
I'm summary, the 4K is definitely better but not by a whole lot.
That's not a knock against the 4K. I think it looks as good as it's possible to make it look.
They just did a really good job with those old Blu-rays.
_Back to the Future_ is one of my favorite films of all time. I'm glad to see quality work was put into these home releases.
the 4k is leaps and bounds better, this video isn’t doing a good job showing off the 4k at all.
Definitely a great amount of detail and skin tones look more realistic, more clarity also..and the Dolby Atmos soundtracks will be awesome. Yeah my copy on the way.
The 4k gives you that slight detailed and colords are more realistics, the blu-ray is too saturated! Nice , can't wait for my set to arrive!
Me to and damn it they could have delivered it today and they are making me wait until Monday
i'm waiting till Tuesday, which is fine and I can wait.
@Christopher Cravens you gotta watch it on a nice 4k tv to see a good difference
@Christopher Cravens same here
I just upgraded. Have to say the blu rays looked great and this upgrade isn’t that much different. But hey I got the 4ks for $23 so I’m glad to upgrade.
glad I have it in 4K and it looks incredible in 4K on disc and one of my favourite classic movies
This doesn't seem like much of an upgrade I think that's because the Blu-ray was a 4K scan already. Course it does have more detail and I'm sure the HDR would inpprove image. If I didn't already upgrade to the Blu-ray set then I might be interested.
@@jimmneedle Yup! Also, look at Doc's hair at 13:12. Night and day difference between 1080p and 4K.
it's the same 2002 transfer without DNR
Einstein’s food never looked so good!
Almost looks like it's alive in the 4K version.
ok I'm convinced, I'm IN.
OMG some contrast are amazing 🤩🤩🤩🤩
They both look great!
Seems to me, better clarity on faces and sources of focus, and a cleaner contrast, but noise in the darkness has been removed and added... much crisper at times, flatter at others.
Will be sticking with my 2010 just for sake of money but defo a future 4k purchase.
A little boost in details in some scenes but in others is more notorious the boost in detail, that's nice, but personally color and shadows/contrast are the best changes.
The bluray had a little too much saturated colors, now is more natural.
Those scenes in Twin Pines Mall / Lone Pine Mall look amazing.
Looking at a old nasty can of dog food. “Looks amazing”.
Why do some of these appear to be framed slightly differently in the 4K version? When it swipes from the 2010 version to the 4K version, some of these look like the position is moved slightly, or zoomed in very slightly, etc.
Pls do more of those HDR vs Dolby Vision videos. I really love those ones. Great comparison btw.
Hmmm.....I'll see because it's a long process and it takes me a considerable amount of time to make a quality comparison !!!
I'm enjoy this new upgrade with 4k is lit!! 👍🏾
Please could somebody tell me if the US 4k set's 1080p blu-rays are region free or not. Many thanks.
This is definitely not a night and day difference. I do like the sharper detail, but the one thing that I did notice was how face color tones look like they were dull down. Although when you look at Marty in the DeLorean after he just arrived in 1955 still wearing his hazmat suit, his face looks overly orange in the Blu-ray. They dialed down the skin tones to make it more natural, but I will say some of the Blu-ray scenes seemed better in my opinion. Some of the 4k scenes looked darker, although if I didn’t have a image to compare it too, I would not have noticed. I will still upgrade from my blu rays, Not to mention it will come with another set up blu rays for the people who just prefer it. It’s a win win.
Sorry for having to be honest - but I don't know many movies where the highly advertised new 4K-version was so little better than an 10 year old Blu-Ray-version. Am I the only one who feels like that?
Well then even if you consider that this is a minimal improvement and you think that the Dolby Atmos is not necessary according to you well indeed it's better to stay on its old Blu-ray !
The only way to see a 4k improvement is on a 4k projector unless you have a very large tv its not the leap in quality from blue Ray to 4k like it was from dvd to blue Ray that was a massive improvement
@@paulcadman3562 The 2010 blu-ray version was never good from the start with its clear DNR, so just getting rid of it was necessary. The dvd looked really good when it came out, it is the same master as the 2010 blu-ray, but without artifacts.
@@paulcadman3562 That not true at all.
If you’re too far from you projector you won’t see the difference neither. It doesn’t matter if you watch it on a big screen projector or a 48 inches TV, what matters is the distance you sit from you it. That’s why when you buy a 4K TV you should choose its size with the distance you will sit from it.
In my bedroom I have a 49 inches TV since I don’t have much space and I can clearly see the resolution difference, maybe even more since the dpi is higher. The clarity difference is even more obvious with video games, since I had a PS5 every game I played on 1080p with my base PS4 looks way better. Same for movies.
And again not all 4K masters are equal, on some you won’t even see the difference with the standard Blu-ray no matter screen you have (depends on what camera has been used, if it’s upscaled or true 4K etc). But 4K is almost always the best way to watch a movie
So the 4K version is better right? Okay thanks chat. I'm gonna watch it for free on Amazon Prime Video now. Byeee
Wow the new transfers look Freshhhh.
Just got the 4k. Looks good, but I must admit I was a little disappointed by how subtle the upgrade from blu ray is
We did a good job on the "4K version". Colors, clarity, contrast are clearly better than 1080p. I'm waiting on the channel for the second and third parts;) And like for comparison.👍🏻
? not seeing a "clearly Better". just slightly different...but no real big or moderate jump from what I"m seeing...maybe more of a difference on the big screen
How does the new 2020 1080p blu ray look vs the 2010 blu ray?
That last shot... Amazing!
Great job man as always.
How come they dont look like beetroots on my 1080p discs. I know colours were oversaturated but not to this extent!
Well This is a bit normal because each panel does not have the same contracts or the same colorimetry rates. Therefore I am not surprised Ethan :) !
Skin tones and color accuracy are much improved on the 4K capture. Nightime grain structure and detail are way up too.
I've got a standard 7.1 setup with no Dolby Atmos. No Dolby Vision as my Epson 3800 Home Cinema only supports HDR10. What do you think? Worth the upgrade from the 30th Anniversary set blu-ray set? I'm projecting at 142".
Dear Keith
You have to understand one thing, it's certainly the best version that currently exists because even if you don't have Dolby Vision you still have a good HDR and certainly different but significant enough to take full advantage of this news version.
Some scenes are more brighter and colored detailed on 4k than the Blu-ray version but I'm still not sold yet so help me out, should I buy this Trilogy on 4k?
Definitely because it's certainly the best version you can have with a fairly convincing Atmos sound !
Yes.
So, is this a comparison of the 4K UHD disc or the 4K 1080p bluray transfer? I would assume any 4K disc will always be leaps and bounds over the 1080p bluray.
4K UHD disc alway Dean !
Big upgrade!
Apparantly on the 4k and bluray combi boxset the blurays are new transfers and universal have managed to put the old transfers from the 30 anniversary into this bluray only edition for some unknown reason
Definitely gunna get 👍
i wasnt planning on getting this based on the quality of the movie i was mainly getting this for more bonus features
Does Dolby vision really make a big difference over regular 4K? My 4K player is capable of running Dolby vision but my 4K tv doesn’t support the format
Honestly, yes that changes because Dolby Vision tones are often very natural and there is a nice balance between contrasts and colors. However the HDR 10 is not bad either without counting the Dolby Atmos which it accompanies.
Hello, excellent videos, I have been following you for a long time. These purchases are great. I did not know how to contact by mail but I have two captures. One of this video and the previous one. For one of my videos. I hope you do not mind, of course indicating where they are from and indicating their channel directly, which has a better resolution than my video.
Sorry for the inconvenience.
A greeting .
PS Excuse my English
Back to the future and karate kid are my two favorite 80s trilogy.I have karate kid 4K Blu-ray and wasn’t really that impressed to dark.I was at first hesitant about getting this box set.I thought it was a cheap way for Universal to make another 40-50 dollars.After seeing this I was impressed by it,looking forward for a special sake or Christmas discount sale
Maybe I expecting too much from 4k? I’m thinking there’s gonna be this big shift in picture quality like the jump from dvd to bluray. But I guess the biggest change now will be in the audio and not so much the video? The video changes will be more subtle.
Dear Mike
I find your comment a bit harsh and exaggerated. Frankly this is the best 4K version you can find at this moment.
@@Mymoonization the comment is neither harsh nor exaggerated. The 4k can only reproduce the grain that is present on the film, not increase resolution as though it was shot in 4k. The 1080 30th anniversary does it very well and I think the threshold of information on the film print itself was very close to being reached. This is akin to increasing the KB/s compression to numbers higher than the original file had. There is just no way to go past what originally existed, you simply get a larger file size. As I commented separately, I'm going to pass on this release as the 30th edition looks great and I think has hit the 'definitive' space close enough for me, at least visually.
The skin tones are definitely more accurate in the 4k. On the blu ray they are just too red.
Im not too convinced to spend another $50 on something i already have. My BD version looks great on my oled 77”.
Some 4K shots look better but some blu-ray shots look better. It’s not a necessary upgrade if you already own a Blu-ray set.
And yet this new version remains a significant improvement And here's why. The contrasts are much more nuanced, they bring out the black hiding. Flashes, lights, lamps are very pronounced and detailed. Without forgetting the Dolby Atmos which is very immersive.
The 25th Edition sleeve is the best!
The difference is hard to compare on a UA-cam video. Is this video in HDR? Is it raw data or captured via a camera? Even down to the screen you watched this on cannot demo what the eye would see in person... HDTVtest HDR analysis of this gives a good run through. It's a new 4k scan of the negatives so great detail. Colours and HDR are excellent yet without a high end HDR TV (and even better Dolby Vision) the differences will be less obvious to spot). Although my phone is HDR capable watching this vid it's no where near the Blu-ray quality watched on my OLED.
Captured via a camera ?
You're missing a point dear David.
To watch properly you need to turn on Dolby Vision and of course watch it on a TV and not a phone.
Cheers :)
I’m kind of preferring the Blu-ray.... 🤷🏼♀️
Dear A
If I may, watch the video carefully, you will see that there is a pretty significant change. Watching the flashes the lights the lamps all these details are seen in a natural and rich way on this new 4K version. Also don't forget that there is a Dolby Atmos sound which is very immersive 😉
That's exactly what I think too!
I've seen other comparisons and I prefer the Blu-ray version.
Im really starting to think that 4k is way overhyped.
@@clairenew8283 Come oooon 😏
@@clairenew8283 Sorry Claire but you are wrong because these supposed comparisons are everything except in HDR mode and therefore not representative.
@@clairenew8283 I wouldn't say I prefer the BR version, but the difference between the two is minimal at best (outside of HDR).Also the addition of Atmos is only good for those the additional speakers in the end.
I dunno I think the jury is still out on 4K with older films. Anything made in the last 20 years sure. But there is only so much your can do with a 35 year old film. If I do end up getting this version it really will be the last time I buy a version of this!
I was wondering if you would do a 4K comparison of Daddy’s Home 1,2
Dear Erik
As always many of you ask me for personal comparisons. And my answer is always the same, if my schedule allows it, I will do it with pleasure. Cheers !
It's a back and forth thing for me. In some cases I think the 4K just adds too many artifacts (1:12), and in others it brings clarity back to the image (5:34).
My dad used to recording the movies on VHS for me from the channels over the air...i'll show him the set...do you remember?
I wonder how many of those that have a cheap super entry level 4K tv will say there isn’t any noticeable difference 🤔
8:21 i still dont understand why not redo the effects... "fire still looks fake"
If they start redoing effects we’ll end up like Star Wars.. better to keep it the way it was released.. my opinion
I want to see the 4K HDR clips
I think the 4K Ultra HD release looks darker than the regular Blu-Ray release from 2010 does because the 4K release is less blurry and probably has more proper colors. When a light is too bright, it’s kind of hard to see surroundings!
Every 4k needs Dobly vision. I notice it a lot on my lgc1. Hdr all, though not bad, just doesn't compare for me. I need it Dv all the time now. lol
I have the 2015 Trilogy DVD.
You mean blu-ray :)
not a fair comparison because they have a 2020 remastered blu ray out now. and were u using a 4k upscaling player for the blu ray?
Pardon me ???
What are you talking about.
This is the brand new 4K version vs 25th anniversary !
@@Mymoonization there is new just relesed remaster blu ray, it should be equal to the 4k. and if u use a player that upscales the blu ray to 4k it would look even bettter
If had the Blu Ray I would stick with it, since I don’t I will go with 4K, I don’t see a big enough difference to upgrade
I have the impression that the 4K edition has a slight blue cast.
Watch this on a 4K display with HDR and you'll see how bad the compression artifacts were on the 2010 version. Ugly blocks of color all over the dark areas. BIG improvement in the new version.
That was some shiney dog food in 4k
Back to the future 2
Next week-end !
🙏🙏👍👍💞💞🍻🍻
I'll wait. It's only a matter of time (no pun intended) before they re-release the trilogy on standard Blu-ray remastered in 4k just like ghost busters 1 and 2.
The 4K is amazing.
I don't like the 2020 version it's cold as hell and takes off that film effect... i prefer the 2010 version....
Dear John
If you don't activate Dolby Vision all will appear non-compliant :)
Cheers !
I thought the 4K collection came with new remastered blu rays?
And yet it is John !
Ah cool
🤘
I just ordered them, can’t wait to watch them in 4K glory
It don't look any better too me I guess im not upgrading
Well. Doing an comparsion then have the right svale. This 720p.
9:16 and 9:26 less detail on the skin and hair with "4K"
I don't see any grain. Is that just the compression or has this been given the T2 treatment? Glad to see all the god awful edge enhancement halos gone though.
Apparently there's light grain but nothing overpowering
Very light grain, which is nice and makes it seem like you watching it new
Can only enhance it so much bluray is good enough no need for 4K and remember for 4K you also need a 4K screen not just player
They're not that expensive anymore.
@@dan_hitchman007 nothing to do with price
@@wargodsix It's not an excuse any more going to 4k gear. It's a good video upgrade here and the Atmos tracks are solid.
@@dan_hitchman007 have you seen a real comparison there’s no difference between bluray and 4K of movies that old
@@wargodsix That's not true at all. What movies have you seen??? Lawrence of Arabia looks fantastic in 4k, so does Spartacus, Mr. Smith Goes to Washington, Wizard of Oz, It's a Wonderful Life, Alien, Predator, Die Hard, Jaws, Beetlejuice, etc. all look good to great on 4k Blu-ray.
Wow the differences are tiny
THE DOG FOOD. WHY 🤣🤣
you also have the usa version box sets, the uk gets the cheaper version and inferior version. must cost them thousands to make 2 different box sets for 2 regions. why. just make one. did the same with hitchcock box set the uk one is poor.
It looks better for sure, but, I don't know, I just don't see too much the point of this. It's not like the original version was on 144p or something...
Sooooo, basically if I just increase the brightness on my display by about 10-15%, I instantaneously go from having the standard blu-ray edition to having the 4K edition. Good to know. Good to know I don’t need to waste money rebuying this beloved trilogy yet again.
Nothing that justifies the purchase again.
Dolby Atmos.
@@dan_hitchman007 not a big deal - would be like adding Bluetooth to an early '80s model boombox when it isn't needed.
It's me or in 4k apart from natural colors, i see worst detalis. To be honest out of focus...
Not worth the major price I’ll stick to bluray
4k just have better colors still prefer the DVD version
The Blu-ray 2010 version is too saturated. I saw that version on Netflix and I was little disappointed how the movie looked.
Doesn’t look that much better. Better color maybe. Not a whole lot clearer.
I've been saying this for ages. Most movies don't look that much different. I have the 4K tv, 4K Sony player and the 4K HDMI leads. Not worth the huge price difference. And no, I'm not a tight wad !
@@denisoleary1407 clearly you don't have the right hdr TV then
It's not about clarity it's the hdr. Hell 1080p hdr makes it so much better
5:12 look at the hair. If you play the video at the highest resolution and zoom in on the hair. You can clearly see a difference. If the video was uncompressed and in native 4k like the disk will be. Playing on a 4k OLED TV then the difference would be even more noticeable.
A pointless exercise, if your video isn't in HDR.
But based on this video, I prefer the 2010 version.
Pointless, isn’t HDR ??! :)
Well all my comparisons are in HDR !
And if you want to know how I proceed to make my videos I will have the pleasure to let you know.
@@Mymoonization My TV doesn't report that this video is in HDR.
Also, "stats for nerds" says the video is in the BT709 color space.
Is it a samsung that you have ?
@@Mymoonization LG
Hmmmm.......it's very strange because I also have an LG it works perfectly well ?!!!
Difference just isn’t good enough to warrant an upgrade
Except it looks nothing like that I’m sorry to say I own both sets And the 4K ultra HD looks like trash all they did was dark in the film make some clarity adjustments to the credits and that’s it everything else on the film literally looks like it came from a 90s VHS I couldn’t believe how horrendous it looked the Blu-ray addition beautiful gorgeous nice remaster of the film looks great awesome the 4K version garbage
Blu-ray is a failure of a format. The reasons why are "Price" and that idiotic 2:4:1 "Ultra Widescreen" format that is inferior to the "Open Matte" 16:9 versions we see on Comcast. The resolution of 4K is "higher" than 1080p. However, that also makes bad things more visible, too. Also, the "color" of HDR and Dolby Vision is definitely an "opinion" regarding which one is "better." Also, most 1080p HDTV sets have some sort of "Deep Color" mode that simulates the effects of HDR and Dolby Vision. These ultra minor differences are not worth the HUGE difference in "Price."
The entire reason the 3D format failed with Blu-ray was also because of "Price." If the developers would have simply tossed an extra Blu-ray into the box for free with that high cost of $20 to $25 rather than forcing people to spend an absurd $40 for a 3D version, we would have seen the 3D format succeed. Greed is what made it so Blu-ray never achieved the level of success the DVD format did.
DVD gave us a "Widescreen" version of the movie on one side, and a "Fullscreen" version of the movie on the other side. Or two different discs. Blu-ray never went that extra mile to satisfy customers.
Same thing with sound. Blu-ray only uses 48hz for sound. DVD had many movies that used 96hz sound. For example, I initially owned Vertical Limit with 48hz sound on DVD. I then bought Vertical Limit with 96hz sound on DVD. And then I bought Vertical Limit on Blu-ray - which only has 48hz, but the sound is "Lossless." The version that sounds by far the best is the impressive DVD version with 96hz Lossy sound.
@Moist Gnome I agree we have different opinions. But, as far as facts go, the 8-bit color settings provided in 1080p and younger 4K TV models provide 16.77 Million colors. The Deep Color modes in most of those HDTV sets improves those colors even more.
Also, the sales of 4K TV sets were so poor because people clearly saw there were only very minor differences between 1080p and 4K TV sets. Yes, if you went to a view of a city where there were hundreds of cars driving around and each car was the size of a small number of pixels, there was less distortion in the 4K HDTV. But in every other type of scene, there was no noticeable difference.
As a result, the manufacturers came up with the idea of "HDR" 10-bit color that increased the number of colors seen from 16.77 Million to over 1 Billion colors. And the 12-bit color from Dolby Vision provides over 68 Billion colors. This was the new marketing gimmick to try to get people to buy 4K TV sets.
But, most companies choose to use 10-bit HDR rather than 12-bit Dolby Vision, because HDR can be used for free; however, when they use Dolby Vision it necessary to pay Dolby for the use of their technology. The difference is so minor between the two, most companies would rather save the money by using HDR. Plus, according to many reviews, the HDR looks better than Dolby Vision.
The reason 10-bit HDR vs 12-bit Dolby Vision comparisons end up with HDR as the winner is the same reason why we often see the 8-bit technology with 16.77 Million colors end up as the winner - because "more" is not not necessarily, "better." I will explain.
The companies marketed HDR as "10-bit is more than 8-bit. And 10-bit offers 1 Billion colors, which is more than the 16.77 Million offered by 8-bit."
And the companies marketed Dolby Vision as "12-bit is more than 10-bit. And 12-bit offers 68 Billion colors, which is more than the 1 Billion offered by 10-bit."
But, stop and consider that the difference between 8-bit and 10-bit was about 1 Billion colors. Now consider that the difference between 10-bit and 12-bit is about 67 Billion colors. That would mean the difference between HDR and Dolby Vision should be HUGE - far greater than the difference between 8-bit and 10-bit technologies. But, that is NOT the case at all. In fact, HDR often wins comparisons with Dolby Vision - just as 8-bit technology does.
The reason why is because the 8-bit technology that uses only 16.77 Million colors uses the "best" 16.77 Million colors there are, while the other technologies use up to 68 Billion colors - including colors that are inferior.
Think of yourself as a marketing director for the 8-bit technology. Now think of a marketing plan for 8-bit technology where your theme is telling consumers that other technologies allow movies to use up to 68 Billion colors, while 8-bit technology focuses on "filtering" out the "bad" colors in order to focus on using "Only the best 16.77 Million colors in order to make sure you get the 'best' picture quality at all times."
That is the entire reason why the 10-bit technology often looks better than the 12-bit technology that offers 67 Billion more colors.
And that is the reason why the 8-bit technology often looks better than 10-bit HDR and 12-bit Dolby Vision. 16.77 Million may be a "smaller" number, but it is as if you get to pic your "favorite" 16.77 Million colors. As a result, it often ends up looking "better" (albeit less accurate on paper) in the 8-bit version.
In the end, it is all a matter of "opinion" regarding which one is "better." But, many people say the HDR and Dolby Vision versions are "flatter" and simply don't look as good. It is like giving a kid a box of crayons with 68 Billion different colors. In reality, the kid will say the box with 64 or 32 colors is "better" simply because the smaller box contains only the "favorites" that are used the most.
man....again.....not much of a difference. not better, just different in my opinion. likes playing with the sepia/or gray, little more soft/natural color added....a Little but worth buying again? maybe more of a difference on a bigger screen
Well if you don't see any difference i respect. But as far as I'm concerned there is a difference in terms of resolution and above all you have a nice Atmos sound which is not yet negligible !
For me I felt like the movie was too dark in Dolby vision. Watched the lg cx. For example that scene when he did the 🖖 I barely saw it.
imgur.com/a/aDVHzar
Have you properly calibrated your television set by a professional and if so in this case slightly increase the brightness.
Something is amiss with your TV and/or settings.
@@Mymoonization I have not. Settings are good but I think I figured it out. I had to disable all the ai service settings
4k looks like an instagram filter. But in 4k version they safe highlihghts detales. But i prefere warm version of 2010, because it looks like movie from 80`s.
@@jimmneedle almost every modern remasters looks cold, vivid, and with dark contrast) i dont know why. Maby its beacause modern tv an screens can do better picture with black shadows and good color. And the try to do picture also modern. But this films from another times. And for me new color not works.
i can not see an improvement from my Blu ray there is no more detail only HDR improvement , i will stick with my Blu ray i think .
Couldn't tell the difference
BTTF is my favorite series and despite this coming out today, on my birthday, I think I'm going to pass. The 4k just doesn't have enough improvement to warrant the re-buy. 4 new extra features plus the exact same versions of the extras as my 30th anniversay... I have to give it a 'meh'. I'm currently working on a BTTF project (can't talk about) and so rewatched the trilogy last month. Can't see myself with another rewatch of the 4k versions any time soon. Looks like I'll wait until the 40th anniversary when it's been remastered in 3D and then the 45th as a hologram. I wonder how many other die hards feel the same as me and if those sales reflect the over saturation of versions. Will the studio think the interest in BTTF has finally dissipated, or will they expect a lower sales number due to the very similar version they released recently. who knows.
8K IS ALREADY HERE!!!! NOW YOU WILL HAVE TO WASTE YOUR MONEY ON 8K DISC AND COMPLAIN SOME MORE.
At 8.52 is the best proof that 2010 is better!!Drops of swaet in face...Also at 9.15 face wrinkles.
I'm not overwhelmed by the difference...for some pictures the 4K version is even worse than the 2010 version....i think it's wise to say that this " new version" will be purchased by people who never had the trilogy before...
Doesn’t look much different to me.
You might need to look a bit more closely - there are some subtle differences between the 1080p and 4K versions.
Can't they just improve the image and leave the colors alone? 13:33 awful.
yea... infact i don't like the color grading of the new 4k... prefer the warm of 2010 version...
Well this is what I am explaining to you. Because you see it with cold colors now, whereas if you activate Dolby Vision you will see that it will become warmer and more natural.
Seriously? I do not see worth the money to upgrade to 4K ..commercialism at it's best. Old product with "slight' improvement...sell sell sell.
Not that much difference really 🤔
Looks like they didn't go back to the original negative. I figured so because of the price. I'm betting this is an upconvert from the original Blu-Ray with a new color grading. Shame.
And yet it’s the best 4K version.
Sorry Colt !
Was this made by a bot?
stick to the 2010 version