naruto finds out that water is wet but refuses to believe it audio from - • Water is Wet body actors legand outerwinstar yummyasa - @yummyasa rivershrimp jasmine - @jasval Maixiel
Exactly. If water isn't wet you can breathe in water and not "drown". Well? I'm waiting Shikamaru! Breathe the water! Can't do it? Interesting... 200+ IQ my ass...
The video makes it so much funnier when you realise in the video they are supposed to be getting wet from the water but they aren't wet so they keep trying to tell him that water ain't wet . . . And it actually isn't but he's not even seeing it even when they line up and show him at the end😂
I’m gonna side with Naruto here let’s bring it back to the dirt if you put dirt on other things, it makes it dirty but it doesn’t make the dirt dirty right well I could say the same about shit it stinks if you put it on stuff it’s probably dirty, so therefore the shit is dirty
I love how he said “ your logic is predicated on the fact that this physical object isn’t a physical object, that touches otherphysical objects therefore, you’re stupid”😂
Not the same thing fire isn't burnt and water isn't wet. Part of where people go wrong is messing up the logics like saying fire is hot and water is wet when that is saying fire is hot like water can't also be hot
I was interested so I did some surface level research cause I'm not that pressed about it. So far both are right it's all about how one defines being "wet".
I know it's a joke but nerd time. The concept of "Wet" (when concerning water) comes from the fact something is covered in the water's molecules and the way they interact with other molecules in the area. To say water ISN'T wet is to ignore that fact. Something is wet because it's has an abundance of water molecules on/in it and that's it, not because it has a new slippery property. This is how Hydrophobic coatings work, they keep out water molecules. So this isn't a transfer of property as was argued, because the properties of water aren't changed or transferred when it touches something. Rather, something being "wet" is just an accumulation of matter. I.E. Water IS wet because wet by definition just means "Excess water molecules have settled in the area" Also a thing having a property in and of itself that it then gives to something else isn't new or outrageous, it's actually a fairly basic reaction for many things. All this to say, Shikamaru didn't deserve Temari.
just the fact that water attracts more water is the definitive proof that water is indeed, wet. Water searchs for more water, a water droplet tries to hug other water droplets as long as its surface tension can keep it
No, no, NO. Do not use long paragraphs and technical statements to sound like this argument is sound. You basically just said that being wet means something has water in it, which means water itself is wet. But that's not how it works. Being wet is to change the dryness of a surface, not to just have water molecules in it. Otherwise WE would be wet, ALL the time. Water molecules being with other water molecules doesn't make it wet. You're basically saying the thing that makes other things wet is inside of itself, which means it is also wet. That doesn't fucking make sense. Water. Is. Not. Wet.
@@suohd.sunking6964 So reading your paragraph it was very clear you have no idea what I actually said because "Being wet means something has water in it, which means water itself is wet" and the weird logical leaps you made from that is not the conclusion. At all. To be honest your knowledge of the subject matter at hand i questionable considering what I read from you. That aside, Water doesn't change anything when it touches something dry. The molecules are only interacting with dry object's. If you remove the water molecules from something, there is no change in the object itself. It remains as as it was before water was introduced. That isn't how a transfer of property works. If one object transfers it's properties to another, then that object has that new property regardless of if the original object is present after the fact. If water held any tendency to transfer property like that, the world we live in would be vastly different and quite frankly unlivable (and I mean that literally). So I'll rephrase and explain this since you seem to have trouble comprehending. Water DOES NOT transfer ANY property when something touches it. In other words, it does not change and nothing it touches changes. So "wet" CANNOT be a transferable property of water (in fact it's not a "property" at all but I'll get to that later). Similar to how Darkness doesn't actually exist because it's just the absence of light, WETNESS only exists because excess water molecules settle on/in something. That's it. Water in the air touches you all the time and every day, even when you don't realize it. Yet, you'd never say you wet simply because you wake up in the morning. So, what does that mean? That means, once again, wet is not a property, wet is a _DESCRIPTION._ Do you understand? The thing you're describing as "Wet" is not a trait or property of water, it IS the water. It's the water molecules linking together or rolling around on the surface/under the surface of something. The word "WET" is meant to describe the excess presence of water in the area. tl;dr Just as Darkness describes the absence of light, Wetness describes _presence and excess_ of water. That's all it does. And I sincerely hope you can follow this because that's as simple as it gets.
Id be more concern about what the hell im swimming in. How does the water not get the scarf wet if it is the source of making thing things other than itself wet?
“Wet” is a way to describe a non liquid object that has been temporarily covered in a liquid (preferable water). Rocks can be wet cause they can be covered in water. Clothes can be wet because they can be covered with water. (Often called being soaked at times) Water CANNOT be wet because it is a liquid. You’ve NEVER heard someone spill water in juice and say, “Great now my juice is all wet!” It doesn’t make sense when applying to another liquid. INCLUDING ITSELF. You can have “wet” water. It’s ALREADY itself and can never be “dry” to become “wet.” Cause “dry” is a way to describe a non liquid object that has not been covered in a liquid. Water can’t be “dry” either. So….we’re probably gonna have to find a way to describe water (itself, not while applied to an object) with another new word.
tbh, it can go both ways since water is fundamentally comprised of atoms constantly in contact with one another creating the molecules that make up water. In other words, you could say that water simultaneously is and is not wet
@@aaronjones6299 That's not a valid response. Water is hydrophilic. A property of water is to be attracted to water. A water molecule isolated from other molecules does not properly express traits of water. Water is a term that does not refer to a single water molecule, as long an H2O molecule is in contact with another than it is wet. Water molecules do not impart their properties onto the things they touch. Water is not like a magnet that causes metals to also become magnetic. Wetness is merely the effects/experience of being covered in water. If you put water on water, then the water is wet.
Don't let Shikamaru's dumb aa deviate you from the question. Water is touching something at all times, so they just can't say water isn't wet. The mf changed the subject cuz he got nothing!
I have been studying as many different philosophies as I can since I was 11 years old and I can't believe this concept as never occur to me and Naruto is right water is wet.
The video makes it so much funnier when you realise in the video they are supposed to be getting wet from the water but they aren't wet so they keep trying to tell him that water ain't wet . . . And it actually isn't but he's not even seeing it even when they line up and show him at the end😂
@@EALS365no, it extinguishes because its source(whatever it’s burning) is gone. Whether that be wood or air. Once you take away the source, it cannot burn.
Its a fools argument because it ignore the idea of actul things giving its own properties ie: fire can make fire hotter just one example narutos right he just doesnt have the actual information to argue it dont let the useful idiots deceive u
Wet by definition is a causation of water, and inapplicable to water itself. I don't make the rules, i just read the books, and they're specific about shit like this.
Same thing: Moistness is the amount of moisture (usually presented in percentage) of a certain thing. So water IS moist. wetness can only occur if the thing is attracted to liquids. If it is currently soaked or holding on to the thing, it is wet. Water comes in droplets which combine for how long surface tension can hold itself. So, basically. The more water the more moist it is, and the more water the more soaked it is. This means that if we even use the 2nd “definition” of wetness (how moist it is on a scale). Water is still wet. Water being itself makes it wet. Conclusion: water is wet and moist.
Water is wet, in the sense of being a liqui which flows easily, because its viscosity is low, which is because its molecules are rather loosely joined together.
"Therefore water is wet!" Drowning Sasuke at the same time had him floating there deceased for the rest of the video and nobody said nothing about nothing😂
We qualify the air we breath as "wet" because of air humidity containing water particles. like I dont just mean fog or clouds. The regular air we breath. Honestly, this is one of those scenarios that could have both sides be right in some way. But the overwhelming majority of people agreeing with one side overrides the single person with the opposing viewpoint.
you know, I actually get the logic here it's similiar to a pokemon status effect like fire pokemon can burn other pokemon while it can't burn itself because it's won't make sense otherwise similar to other types of status effects, i think naruto needs to play some pokemon just to finally understand.
I love how he is just casually drowning sasuke
I thought he was baptizing him
@@siphosethumtiya9387💀💀💀
Fr Tho ☠️🤣🤣🤣
What happened to sasuke
@@MyolsBlandNaruto drowned him
"am I speaking fucking chinese" Naruto got personal with that one
I laughed at that part🤣
@@mohezzy2ez555 who didnt😂
The delivery 👏🏽
I also like how Naruto calls Hinata a fuckin heathen. He put so much power into that word LMAO
Same
Them casually talking while getting smacked with water over and over again.
Exactly. If water isn't wet you can breathe in water and not "drown". Well? I'm waiting Shikamaru! Breathe the water! Can't do it? Interesting... 200+ IQ my ass...
The video makes it so much funnier when you realise in the video they are supposed to be getting wet from the water but they aren't wet so they keep trying to tell him that water ain't wet . . . And it actually isn't but he's not even seeing it even when they line up and show him at the end😂
@@bradleychan5684😂😂😂
@@bradleychan5684 😂😂💀
1st time ever, Naruto wasn't the dumb one in the room
This was the scenario where he was THE MOST dumb, I got angry at my phone listening to Naruto, water ain’t wet
@@JC-dt6xc bro, you're dumb
@@JC-dt6xc You can't get depressed, you make yourself depressed. Therefore you are not depressed.
@@bradleychan5684 that is the same logic as water is not wet
I’m gonna side with Naruto here let’s bring it back to the dirt if you put dirt on other things, it makes it dirty but it doesn’t make the dirt dirty right well I could say the same about shit it stinks if you put it on stuff it’s probably dirty, so therefore the shit is dirty
"This scarf means a lot to me"
*Proceeds to throw it to solid water*
Ah yes solid water
Solid Water!?! Nah bro that's Ice
@@lazyRider420 Das cold af 🥶
liquid
@@epickid4268yes
Sai casually doing the most random ass shits in the background.
Same how she wasn't saying anything in the original video 😂
@@Santanapng0she?
brother Sai ain't no she...@@Santanapng0
ARE WE GONNA IGNORE SASUKE PISSING WITB THE WATER GUN THAT S WHAT GOT ME💀💀💀
1:36 “It can’t make itself itself”
YOU ARE TALKING TO THE NINJA WHO CLONES HIMSELF ALL THE TIME!
Lol
That’s not the same thing. Can Naruto make everyone else Naruto?
@@justindeliwe8065oh snap, the dudes might be onto something
@@justindeliwe8065unless he uses his shadow clone technique
@@Santanapng0 Then no. Just stfu, you already failing to justify this response with actual logic.
and that's how he joined the Akatsuki.
Cuz they literally got the guy who's an EXPERT in water.
‘water is touching itself all damn time’💀
Calm down
@@anthonyxwillaims6112 Jamal don't
Bruh he didn’t mean like that, just stop bro🤦🏾♂️
@@Jayydeen (ahem your line was pull out)
@@imbadatusernames8206 no
You fu*king Heathens!-Naruto Just Got personal with that one
Naruto drowning sasuke 😂
Hinata riding Sai 💀
Ion know how I missed that the first time😭
She was just straight up meat riding! 💀
Not riding. Only legends know what she’s doing
bro lost his future wife@(i mean naruto sry)
That conversation would've threw me over the edge water is definitely wet ... would've swung on everyone in there 😅😂
Bruh r u for real 😂
You just like Naruto, water ain’t wet bruh, this was an actual factual video
@@JC-dt6xc Can you prove it though?
@@cameronsylvester8934 that r u and for real sounds awfully close like swinging distance close rethink your next words 😂
@@BlackAssBilly naw I think I'm just the right distance you start swinging you gonna be catching these hands
You speaking mad Chinese right now
I love how he said “ your logic is predicated on the fact that this physical object isn’t a physical object, that touches otherphysical objects therefore, you’re stupid”😂
Naruto: so you're all telling me that water isn't wet
Shikamaru: believe it!
Omg this meme is gonna live on forever. We gonna have AI and Aliens looking at us weird af in a few years
I'm with Naruto that's like saying Fire isn't hot by their "water isn't wet" logic.
Well... Other objects experience heat and become hot in the presence of fire. Fire can't really burn itself, though. XD
@@c6rn6g2k1dwater wets and fire burns. Fire can’t burn itself because it burns anyways. Water can’t wet itself because it’s wet anyways.
It's more like saying Fire is on fire.
Not the same thing fire isn't burnt and water isn't wet. Part of where people go wrong is messing up the logics like saying fire is hot and water is wet when that is saying fire is hot like water can't also be hot
@@DPowered2water can also be dry
This is why he's the Hokage, man knows from personal experience just from trying to stand on top of the stuff.
Water doesn't need to "make itself" anything. It already is.
I was interested so I did some surface level research cause I'm not that pressed about it. So far both are right it's all about how one defines being "wet".
You can't get depressed, you make yourself depressed. Therefore you are not depressed. You just want to feel validated and "special".
@@bradleychan5684 don't see your point there as there is two kinds of depressions but ok.
0:47 Me when someone bites ice cream with their teeth
"Am I f**king speaking Chinese" I'm dying 😭
Edit: I've seen this on IG, now I'm seeing this on UA-cam which really makes my day.
I know it's a joke but nerd time. The concept of "Wet" (when concerning water) comes from the fact something is covered in the water's molecules and the way they interact with other molecules in the area. To say water ISN'T wet is to ignore that fact. Something is wet because it's has an abundance of water molecules on/in it and that's it, not because it has a new slippery property. This is how Hydrophobic coatings work, they keep out water molecules. So this isn't a transfer of property as was argued, because the properties of water aren't changed or transferred when it touches something. Rather, something being "wet" is just an accumulation of matter. I.E. Water IS wet because wet by definition just means "Excess water molecules have settled in the area"
Also a thing having a property in and of itself that it then gives to something else isn't new or outrageous, it's actually a fairly basic reaction for many things. All this to say, Shikamaru didn't deserve Temari.
just the fact that water attracts more water is the definitive proof that water is indeed, wet. Water searchs for more water, a water droplet tries to hug other water droplets as long as its surface tension can keep it
No, no, NO. Do not use long paragraphs and technical statements to sound like this argument is sound. You basically just said that being wet means something has water in it, which means water itself is wet.
But that's not how it works. Being wet is to change the dryness of a surface, not to just have water molecules in it. Otherwise WE would be wet, ALL the time.
Water molecules being with other water molecules doesn't make it wet. You're basically saying the thing that makes other things wet is inside of itself, which means it is also wet. That doesn't fucking make sense. Water. Is. Not. Wet.
@@suohd.sunking6964 Man water can be made hydrophobic, so normal water is indeed, wet.
@@suohd.sunking6964 So reading your paragraph it was very clear you have no idea what I actually said because "Being wet means something has water in it, which means water itself is wet" and the weird logical leaps you made from that is not the conclusion. At all. To be honest your knowledge of the subject matter at hand i questionable considering what I read from you.
That aside, Water doesn't change anything when it touches something dry. The molecules are only interacting with dry object's. If you remove the water molecules from something, there is no change in the object itself. It remains as as it was before water was introduced.
That isn't how a transfer of property works. If one object transfers it's properties to another, then that object has that new property regardless of if the original object is present after the fact.
If water held any tendency to transfer property like that, the world we live in would be vastly different and quite frankly unlivable (and I mean that literally).
So I'll rephrase and explain this since you seem to have trouble comprehending.
Water DOES NOT transfer ANY property when something touches it. In other words, it does not change and nothing it touches changes. So "wet" CANNOT be a transferable property of water (in fact it's not a "property" at all but I'll get to that later).
Similar to how Darkness doesn't actually exist because it's just the absence of light, WETNESS only exists because excess water molecules settle on/in something. That's it.
Water in the air touches you all the time and every day, even when you don't realize it. Yet, you'd never say you wet simply because you wake up in the morning.
So, what does that mean? That means, once again, wet is not a property, wet is a _DESCRIPTION._ Do you understand? The thing you're describing as "Wet" is not a trait or property of water, it IS the water. It's the water molecules linking together or rolling around on the surface/under the surface of something. The word "WET" is meant to describe the excess presence of water in the area.
tl;dr
Just as Darkness describes the absence of light, Wetness describes _presence and excess_ of water. That's all it does.
And I sincerely hope you can follow this because that's as simple as it gets.
I read all of this thread 😂
So we all heard ino right 🤣🤣
hehe
Well, the water, jumping around XDD 0:45
I couldn’t with that “am I fucking speaking Chinese?!?”😂
Naruto:”You’re not wet!!!”
Ino:”F***ing right about that.”
But ino was on shikamaru side
"Fuckin right about that"
''You F***king Heathens!''
Naruto then became a watersuki terrorist to prove water is wet
Naruto and Sakura having a chit chat meanwhile Sasuke and Hinata are drowning a poor bastard and shikamaru be like I I saw nothing 😂😂😂😂
My mind is exploding because how complicated this conversation is I can’t handle it I don’t have enough chakra brain power to handle this conversation
Naruto has got some mad patience. I would’ve started swinging after 10 seconds of that shit.
“It cant give itself its own property.”
BECAUSE ITS ALREADY WET-
Id be more concern about what the hell im swimming in.
How does the water not get the scarf wet if it is the source of making thing things other than itself wet?
“Wet” is a way to describe a non liquid object that has been temporarily covered in a liquid (preferable water). Rocks can be wet cause they can be covered in water. Clothes can be wet because they can be covered with water. (Often called being soaked at times) Water CANNOT be wet because it is a liquid. You’ve NEVER heard someone spill water in juice and say, “Great now my juice is all wet!” It doesn’t make sense when applying to another liquid. INCLUDING ITSELF. You can have “wet” water. It’s ALREADY itself and can never be “dry” to become “wet.” Cause “dry” is a way to describe a non liquid object that has not been covered in a liquid. Water can’t be “dry” either. So….we’re probably gonna have to find a way to describe water (itself, not while applied to an object) with another new word.
Naruto needs new friends
I think everyone is forgetting 2 things. 1 Naruto dropped out of school, and 2: he’s a ‘special’ case.
He's right dou
He's actually the right one here
@@mcpa1906 he is not you can even look it up
Water isn’t wet. Water makes other things wet.
@@pyrus0zero so then water makes it's self wet, problem solved
One, I agree with Naruto. Two "you ain't wet" and "got that right* got me cryin
"Fire isn't hot. It makes other things hot."
Of the people "transforming the content". This is my favorite NGL. Thanks for crediting
Love your videos and they are really funny 😂❤!
tbh, it can go both ways since water is fundamentally comprised of atoms constantly in contact with one another creating the molecules that make up water.
In other words, you could say that water simultaneously is and is not wet
They got from 'touching water that doesn't make you wet ' to 'water isn't wet'
Genuinely speaking tho - I'm with Naruto on this one.
Water IS wet. Soap IS self cleaning. Where tf do the other takes even come from?
Science and research is were they come from.
@@aaronjones6299 That's not a valid response. Water is hydrophilic. A property of water is to be attracted to water. A water molecule isolated from other molecules does not properly express traits of water.
Water is a term that does not refer to a single water molecule, as long an H2O molecule is in contact with another than it is wet.
Water molecules do not impart their properties onto the things they touch. Water is not like a magnet that causes metals to also become magnetic. Wetness is merely the effects/experience of being covered in water. If you put water on water, then the water is wet.
@@23Raind If you put water on water, you just increase its amount.
Same as putting dirt on dirt, makes the pile bigger.
Water ISNT wet and since tf when has soap been self cleaning?
Don't let Shikamaru's dumb aa deviate you from the question. Water is touching something at all times, so they just can't say water isn't wet. The mf changed the subject cuz he got nothing!
This is why I’m grateful I was born stupid
Don’t have to get into pointless arguments like these
to this day, this argument is still going
I'm I speaking Chinese 😂
I have been studying as many different philosophies as I can since I was 11 years old and I can't believe this concept as never occur to me and Naruto is right water is wet.
The video makes it so much funnier when you realise in the video they are supposed to be getting wet from the water but they aren't wet so they keep trying to tell him that water ain't wet . . . And it actually isn't but he's not even seeing it even when they line up and show him at the end😂
Sasuke has been drowned and nobody bats an eye
F**k em
To this day, this argument is still going
I’m impressed that these new voice actors for this video can be able to get the right accent of the original voice actors of Naruto characters
This got to be some next level gaslighting
This audio kills me 😂😂😂
“Yeah, I’m gonna side with logic”😂😂
Me: ... *MIND OPEN JUTSU*
“It IS a big deal. This scarf means a lot to me.” *as he throws it across the room* lmfao 😩😩😭😭
💀 the property can’t give itself its own property
But that’s like saying fire can’t burn
It is like saying fire is buring itself
@@aaronjones6299it does. That's why it extinguishes.
@@EALS365no, it extinguishes because its source(whatever it’s burning) is gone. Whether that be wood or air. Once you take away the source, it cannot burn.
Damn even his disabled shadow clone sided with them 😂
I love this video
THATS RIGHT, AM I SPEAKING CHINESE??!?!
Whoever made this original video is somewhere living they best life fr
1:37 The Water cycle begs to differ.
I swear if this video ain't some of the funniest shit i seen in awhile! 😂
Shikamaru: “Water isn’t wet”
Naruto: “Give me your neck!” 💀
Y’know I was on Naruto’s side then Shikamaru broke it down and changed my mind 😂🤣😂
Its a fools argument because it ignore the idea of actul things giving its own properties ie: fire can make fire hotter just one example narutos right he just doesnt have the actual information to argue it dont let the useful idiots deceive u
shikamaru made no sens
@@mageninjaballer1449He did actually
@@mageninjaballer1449 I understood it
I was Naruto when my science teacher told me the same thing.
He speaks th truth
This needs a part two man
If my friends were this stupid, I think I’d let the Akatsuki win. A world were people genuinely think water isn’t wet shouldn’t exist.
I love how the shadow clone of naruto is on a wheelchair
Therefore your stupid -Naruto
That part got me dead😂
”this scarf is very important to me”
*tosses scarf into the pool*
Wet by definition is a causation of water, and inapplicable to water itself. I don't make the rules, i just read the books, and they're specific about shit like this.
You got me questioning my own reality;
Love how Naruto's eyes turned red the moment shikamaru said water isn't wet 🙏🏾
This is unhinged in the best way possible.
Y'know Naruto i used to be just like you... thinking that water was wet but shikamari is right water isn't wet... it's moist
Same thing:
Moistness is the amount of moisture (usually presented in percentage) of a certain thing. So water IS moist.
wetness can only occur if the thing is attracted to liquids. If it is currently soaked or holding on to the thing, it is wet.
Water comes in droplets which combine for how long surface tension can hold itself. So, basically. The more water the more moist it is, and the more water the more soaked it is.
This means that if we even use the 2nd “definition” of wetness (how moist it is on a scale). Water is still wet.
Water being itself makes it wet.
Conclusion: water is wet and moist.
Bro…it doesnt NEED to give itself the property of wet because it already HAS THE PROPERTY
Naruto right for the wrong reason 😂
If it’s more than one molecule of water the water is making the water wet
So I was wrong in science wet is somethings ability to adhere to a solid surface therefore ice is wet but water can’t be wet since it’s not solid
“The scarf means a lot to me” **tosses the scarf aside into the pool**
Water is wet, in the sense of being a liqui which flows easily, because its viscosity is low, which is because its molecules are rather loosely joined together.
“Ur not wet” is wild😭
Nah nah
Hit em with the easiest question
“If it aint wet, what is it?”
Well if waters wet that implies there dry water
Naruto standin on bidness 😤😤
Some is flying 🗣️🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥
"Therefore water is wet!" Drowning Sasuke at the same time had him floating there deceased for the rest of the video and nobody said nothing about nothing😂
Bro got put into a genjustu😂😂😂
I love this can’t naruto have water release is sage six paths
Me and my coworkers were just arguing about this point the other day. It got THIS heated.😂
It’s funny how Naruto is actually the genius of this argument
We qualify the air we breath as "wet" because of air humidity containing water particles.
like I dont just mean fog or clouds. The regular air we breath.
Honestly, this is one of those scenarios that could have both sides be right in some way. But the overwhelming majority of people agreeing with one side overrides the single person with the opposing viewpoint.
Naruto speaking fact 🗣️🗣️🗣️🔥🔥🔥
Sai started this and then proceeded to say nothing the whole vid. That's him for real
“A property doesn’t make itself, itself”
Me: so if im myself does that mean i cant be myself?🤔
you know, I actually get the logic here it's similiar to a pokemon status effect
like fire pokemon can burn other pokemon while it can't burn itself because it's won't make sense otherwise
similar to other types of status effects, i think naruto needs to play some pokemon just to finally understand.
Next fire isn't hot.
That's not a physical attribute
@@Kuribohchaos8 That's like saying water ain't wet
“Water can’t be in and of itself wet.” Like dirt can’t be in and of itself dirty because it’s dirt.”
He is right you know.
Dirt is dirty.
Water is wet.
It’s basically similar situations.