Are DSLR cameras still relevent in 2024?
Вставка
- Опубліковано 10 чер 2024
- In this weeks video, I give you my thoughts on DSLR cameras and if they are still relevant in 2024.
Check out @mpbcom for great used gear (not affiliated).
Music from #Uppbeat (free for Creators!):
uppbeat.io/t/adi-goldstein/i-...
License code: UVFE3B5BUTGAQ9EV
I absolutely agree. A ten year old fullframe camera, a 24mm, 50mm and around 135mm lens and you have everything you need to make breathtaking pictures in most situations. If you cant do it with that stuff, the gear is not the problem. And if your budget is very thight, just the fullframe camera and a 50mm prime lens will do the job most of the time.
Well said! OVF is great, because it "forces" you to learn technique, science & light, properly. Something that mirrorless makes ppl get lazy about I think.
My name is DSLR Forever. Don't give a damn whether they produce it any longer. Own multiple Canon pro bodies with tons of shutter life remaining. So, no worries about gears, just concentrate on my photography.
Thank you for the video.
Nothing wrong with that, in the end the user makes the photo not the gear.
Well said! People get caught up in the newest technology forsaking the art of photography. Your samples are an excellent example. It’s the creator more than the tool that produces stunning photos. 👍👍👍
Nice video. Appreciate acknowledging that Pentax still exists. My main camera is a Pentax K5 IIs. And I also have a mirrorless Olympus EM 5 Mark 2.
Funny thing was I bought the K5 IIs as a hedge when it was unclear what the future was going to be for the MFT camera system when Olympus pulled out. Since I bought it I have hardly touched my other camera.
I bought a new D700 and a D3 in 2008 for shooting weddings and events. Other DSLRs followed when i was shooting model portfolios in Manhattan. I later bought a. Z7 but it didn’t do the job. The two Nikons i got back in 2008 are still in use mostly because of their 3D Focus Tracking and the great smoother sensors.
I'm nearly 50.
Blew my savings on a used 1Dx Mk3.
That'll be my last camera.
Ever.
What an absolute beast of a camera!
If you were exclusively saving for it, then more power to you!
But if you took it out of your retirement money, then it's absolutely stupid.
@@humanfirst11 ... then I guess I am absolutely stupid. But hey, arrogance is your super-power, isn't it?...
Just bought a Nikon D810 from mpb. It was described as well used but only $519 US. What a bargain!
Absolute bargain and a great camera!
Wonderful shots! Keep creating friend. :) I'm also shooting with the D850 very often, love the character. I have the Z9 for video.
the d750 and canon 5d mkiii are not only iconic and gamnechangers for their time but they of course still hold up very well today compared to new full frame mirrorless. d750 dynamic range , iso etc is still as good as the best cameras of today
Recently I got a used d750 too, I am happy with it, the IQ from a 10 years camera just blowed my mind . And it cost about 500 bucks here in China which is quite good. I was wondering to buy a fuji. But fuji here was never restock and full of scalpers and overpriced. I might just keep using my D750😁.
Cameras are relevant in that they are the mechanism by which the artist's vision is realised. Beyond that is the capacity and capability of the tool to replicate that vision. That is why I believe that quite often it's the lens that is the most important part of the camera.
I have an Olympus E1, which lends itself more towards portrait photography, due mainly to the 2 x compression of the lenses used, but I'm looking for a Nikon D200 for my outdoor work, as I like the colours out of the camera from the ccd sensor. It seems to reflect my vision of the scene more closely.
I’ve been using my Canon 40D for 17 years. Finally updating, but to the 90D rather than mirrorless. The 90D is reassuringly familiar, is a great introduction to video and proper live view shooting and uses my existing lenses.
Haven't bought a brand new camera for 30 years. All my gear is used Ebay. I keep looking at mirrorless but sometimes it's better the devil you know as well as being a tight wad. 📷💷
In the space of about 10 months i got an olympus e-5 (12 years old) a mirrorless pen-f (5 years old) and then a canon 5d classic (19 years old) i love them all and i use them all for a lot of different things. DSLR have more of an experience to their use. If mirrorless is spotify, DSLR is vinyl. Currently pining after an OM-1 simply for the autofocus and low light range. I think i will always keep the e-5, 5d and pen-f as they give such different vibes. The OM-1 will be a powerhouse of versatility though.
So many great cameras out there with plenty still to give. I'm not against mirrorless in any way, but I think DSLR's still have a place in the world.
Some great cameras there that all pack a punch. I hope they serve you well for years to come.
Well...I just bought a Nikon D300 late last year so for me the answer is a resounding yes! Relevant in 2024.......and beyond. This D300 is my first "real" camera and ironically, I had a type of mirrorless camera (a Nikon COOLPIX L840 super+zoom, point and shoot) which was fun to shoot around with, but simply lacked the control and versatility of a DSLR.
Of course dSLR cameras are still relevant.... certainly not falling for the mirrorless hype at this stage!
Still love my Nikon d750 I bought in 2015. Optical viewfinder is such a pleasure to use and battery lasts for days of shooting,
I do really enjoy an optical viewfinder. If I every go mirrorless, it will be such a loss.
Nice video !! I Went from DSLR's to M4/3 to Sony mirrorless - just retired and now gone back to DSLR's. I don't do video in any shape or form. Last year I bought a mint boxed Nikon D200 and I use it with a couple of Nikon AI manual focus lenses that I already had. 2.4k shutter count - £95 !
Just last week I bought a Canon EOS 1ds mark ii with 27k shutter count in mint condition for £185. I'll be seeking out a few Canon EF primes and I'll be sorted. You just don't need to spend huge amounts to make good images.
I personally don't understand how any camera, whether it be film/digital, slr/dslr, rangefinder, compact, mirrorless (evf or not) would NOT be relevant. If you're only about hunting spec sheets, you'll never be happy anyways. But, if you're into photography as an art, a passion... you'll find enjoyment and be able to use any camera for nearly any use case scenario.
I personally prefer an OVF, so DSLR's are what I'm all about. Big Pentax user here, currently with the K-70 and K-1 ii. I have absolutely no reason to look into mirrorless. The joy of handling a DSLR and using OVF is a huge part of the experience, and it's one I'm not willing to trade up.
I completely agree with what you're saying. While this video talks specifically about DSLR's, I do believe that all cameras are relevant and there are multiple reasons for a person to make their choice. I actually shoot a bit of film, and I'll be doing a video soon where I go out and shoot with my 1936 Zeiss Ikon Ikoflex TLR camera. I too prefer the OVF over EVF.
I still use DSLRs will probably do so for another 10 years but after another birder let me see how snappy mirrorless is I know mirrorless is the future for wildlife photography, DSLRs are still quick but hard to beat a mirrorless when its AFed before I can even react.
I think it really depends on what the hell you are trying to do. If you are buying a camer for PHOTOGRAPHY, an older DSLR is an absolute beast. Hell, even a D7500 or a D500 is an amazing idea, they've got amazing low-light performance. And the lenses are dirt cheap (compared to others). If you are buying a camera for both photo and video or for pure videography, buy a mirrorless camera, the autofocus ai etc. will be an absolute gamechanger.
A full frame DSLR, 24mm 50mm and one 135mm lens all you need for great photographs. I don't think camera and lenses take the photos but the hands behind. Thanks.
Buying a dslr and some lenses can be done for less than £1000 or even cheaper if you go older. I think beginners should start with dslrs because you look at images via a proper viewfinder which teaches you to focus on composition. Then when the image is taken you can critique it (including the exposure). The best way to learn in my opinion is with a prime (50mm) and use manual settings and keep a journal about what you learn.
This is definitely a good way to start in photography, especially if you're on a budget. DSLR's are so underrated these days, but they'll still give you amazing results.
Inverting the question , “how are DSLRs not relevant ?” Is a good provocation.
For me, my DSLRs serve me well for every use case and purpose that I press them into service for.
Perhaps that is to take away from the DSLR that it is more capable than I need.
Ultimately I bought a camera to get the images I need for semi professional and personal use.
DSLRs have been over spec for years.
However there are so many irreverent posts and comments about them being old tech etc.
well so is the humble automobile, same concept but we call the latest new and modern.
I’m not against mirrorless. They have a lot of convenient features and tools . They don’t take better pictures though.
Lovely images Lee. It pays to keep an open mind especially in today's shifting camera market. Although I'm primarily everyday Fuji for the smaller lighter form factor it's hard to ignore the bargain DSLR's NIkon's shift to mirrorless is also throwing up. I had Ai/Ais lenses for adapting but no Nikon camera, so in the summer bought a virtually brand new D700 for £300 plus added 4 D series primes which are also great value due to incompatibility with new Nikon mount. I'm now looking to complete my Nikon set-up with a mint sub 5k shutter count D800 for £500, which with Fuji's popularity just happens to be what MPB will give me for my Fuji X70 which cost me £285 used, what a trade and in my view ups the quality of my set up on a ridiculously low budget.
I should add I have a self imposed spending limit of £500 on a single body, yet I've still managed to get quality Fuji's like the X100F, X-Pro2 and X-H1 and now the Nikon D800 within that budget, they all get there if you have patience . I'm a stills shooter so the latest advancement in video features are wasted on me, the older low priced models more than exceed my requirements and they certainly aren't lacking in quality, quite the opposite. I think it's well worth being conscious of the law of diminishing returns in terms of what you need.
I'd love a little Fuji for an everyday camera. That is a great trade for the X70 and I hope you can get the D800. It's good to have a budget in mind when purchasing new gear and it's great to see people on here who also appreciate older equipment. I'll hopefully be doing some example videos soon of some older cameras.
The answer is yes. Longtime Nikon user here and my most recent and best equipped DSLR is my trusty D4, but recently I have been using my ancient D300 and D90, and you know what, I absolutely love the images they capture, even now in 2024. I simply do not get the sheep mentality that exists when it comes to crappy mirrorless, I just don't get the point of them at all. DSLR's forever!
Couldn’t agree more. No one getting into the game needs all the stuff present in modern cameras. Sure it makes things easier to have modern af and such, but they’re far from essential. If you want to play with a dinosaur dslr mate, my glorious Canon 5d classic is great fun.
Great video mate👍
Absolutely mate, mirrorless systems are great if you have the budget and the requirement, but so many older cameras out there that have lots to offer. I wouldn't mind having a go with the 5D mate. Thanks! 👍
I cant move on from old dslrs, my favourite are the 40d, 50d, 5d classic, 6dmk2 and I even got myself a 30d, yes, a 30d in 2024. I am not interested in the newer R series. One day, I will get a 5d classic when I can afford it.
I am glad I found this video, I was feeling less of a photographer because of everyone saying Dslr are dead, But this video made me feel better lol. I have a Nikon D810 I only shoot stills I don't do any sports or anything that moves fast so I find this camera to work fine. I recently picked up a Nikon 85mm 1.4G for $500 bucks, so quality glass for dslr is more affordable these days too.
Thanks! I'm very happy that this video made you feel better. The gear we use should never be an indicator of how good we are at our craft. The D810 is still a great camera, and that 85mm f1.4 is 🔥.
Thanks!! :)
@@LeeGale
Used market for cameras is a perfect place to start. I did jump straight in on mirrorless but got to say my Sony a6000 produces great images even though it’s was technically released 10 years ago. I do find it struggles a lot with noise though once the iso is pushed
Absolutely, and as I said in the video, nothing wrong with mirroless at all. There are some good videos about proving that some of the older models such as yours are still holding their own. Lots of options for people out there without spending too much money.
@@LeeGale absolutely I think you explained that well, breath of fresh air not to watch a video that’s not pushing the latest and greatest
DSLR’s will always be relevant for people who actually know how to do photography as opposed to being dependent on software or camera features that do all of the work for them.
Negative. Eventually people need to adapt. With mirrorless can help you focus more on taking photos than trying to operate a camera.
Like your tone Lee. Who out there would like to see a camera with no video capability?
In my opinion here is a list of DSLR cameras which are still relevant today:
NIKON D850; D780; D500;
CANON 5Div; 90D;
PENTAX K1ii; K3iii.
If you own them, you can have them further. I personaly use D90.
Been shooting for 18 years and still using my Nikon D3/D700 combo. See no reason to “upgrade”
Yes it is. I lag around my Canon MK 5iii and or DSR. Chuck on a Sigma 20 or a Canon 50. We good
Are they relevant in 2024? Depends on who you asking this question to. To the professionals, and with the fusion of video and photography, who needs to keep up with the latest and greatest to survive, their DSLR are either already been sold on ebay or relegated in a corner where they occasionally pick it up to take a photowalk. To the casual and hobbyists, and collectors it just became relevant especially for people who want to learn photography, since they can be had on the the dirt cheap these day.
MPB is a good place to find gear.
I truly love my DLSR but really wanted to upgrade cameras (I had a T3i) because of low light and I wanted full frame. While my R6M2 is truly an amazing camera, I cannot get used to the digital viewfinder. I desperately wish it was still optical. It takes some of the tangible experience out. Same with not feeling the mirrors move in the camera body it’s just such a different experience I didn’t realize how much I’d miss that aspect. I’m half tempted to get back to dlsr but I just don’t see that as reasonable.
I’m in a similar boat. Have a d850 and bought a z8. Love them both, I like the ways of tracking and sports photos with the z8, but like the shooting experience with the ovf of the d850. It doesn’t make sense to go back but I’m torn as well
I like to look through the lens. Period.
yes
I own a t5i to replace my t2i that was robbed. I bought it in 2020. It make great images. I don't need another camera. I need better lenses.
If you're happy with the camera, then some nice glass is definitely the way to go.
@@LeeGale Yes!!!
Wasn't the Nikon D200 really the evolutionary "leap" towards modern dslrs?
Nikon are still making the D780 and it appears to be fantastic at video.
Dude nice toy collection!!!
Thanks mate! I did wonder how long it would take for someone to notice.
Really?! I mean come on man You have He-Man and Skeletor, Captain Planet and I believe I see Batman and Superman.
@@fatmangaming2720 Just a small part of what I have. Don't have enough room to have everything out.
There's no full frame camera on the planet earth, neigher dslr nor mirrorless that can beat my Pentax K1 in dynamic range. and that's a challenge...)
Nothing against DSLR, pocket, bridge or older mirrorless for a beginner. I had a DSLR years ago but it collected dust. I was not inspired until I purchased a MFT Mirrorless in 2015 and now I use it all the time. Live view changed photography for me. I’m not a pro and never will be. Mirrorless is in my opinion easier because you see the results right away. My advice, do some research, set a budget and buy what you can afford. And if you can afford a mirrorless, do it. Also why did you show epic landscape photos and beautiful models. No beginner will ever be able to capture those photos. Show local everyday places and try to make it interesting and within the grasp of a beginner. Nice video though. I’ll check out a few of your videos. Cheers from Ontario Canada
I agree that budget along with an individuals requirements should be major factors when purchasing a camera regardless of the users ability as a photographer. I have a couple of friends that shoot with MFT and they are brilliant cameras. Regarding the example images, the reason that I showed those is because they are images that I've shot over the past few years and to give an example of the quality of image you can expect from the camera regardless of what level a person is at and hopefully, they may also offer some inspiration.
The muzak is pointless and distracting.
I'm still learning as I go, but I appreciate the feedback.
@@LeeGaleAnyone with common-sense will know that adding music to a video usually ruins it; unfortunately overwhelming vast majority of UA-camrs are infinitely less intelligent than a fart.
Cameras are not relevant. Photographers are. Sadly most cameras from 1900 onward have been way better than most photographers. If your pics are no good it is your fault. It is not the camera that is crap it is you and buying the latest will not alter that by one iota.
Surely not relevant as new camera purchase. Technology has moved on to newer and better things, it’s that simple. While the DSLR may well work perfectly well and do well as a cheap used purchase, it just is not a worthwhile new body purchase unless a whole collection of expensive quality lenses for a system is already owned. Move on folks, the camera companies certainly have. These things are dinosaurs of the camera world.
Ah, some push back. No one is suggesting that DSLR's are as relevant as Mirrorless, just that they are still relevant. This conversation is simply about highlighting the alternative for those who don't have the budget or even the necessity to go Mirrorless. It is the future, but the DSLR still has lots to offer.
The question is not whether DSLRs are relevant in 2024? It is are you the photographer still relevant in 2024? Have you grown in your skills? Your ability to compell and engage with just one frame. To improve the lives others with their delight to your effort, and craft, and art. The equipment Is a small consequence to you as the creator. Whether a Smartphone, point and shoot, film camera, DSLR, or Mirrorless. Where are you in 2024? Have you become obscelete? The old saying friend taught me is what the monkey does behind the viewfinder, not the camera. UA-cam is replete with is this camera relevant in whatever the timestamp the point itself becoming irrelevant. It never is the camera. It's you! It is always about you! Now we return you to the thousands of videos of is this camera relevant in whenever.