I am a mathematician, and I do agree, self learning is unbeatable, I understand material much better and with deeper rigour than what professors can deliver in lecture halls. The message in this video is real.
@@SlimeOhIm It is really quite simple: be your own teacher. Get books on the subjects you like and imagine that you are "two" people: the teacher and the student. I do this all the time, and it works! I studied music theory this way, I learned how to play the saxophone (played in several high-end community bands for 10 years!), and I also studied yoga and even quantum mechanics this same way.
Literally I got goosebumps listening to this incredible journey of Michael Faraday. Here I could draw some parallels with the great indian mathematician Srinivasa Ramanujan who was also an auto didact.
Yes, I was exactly thinking of him, too! This is the best example to demonstrate how hard it was/is to be admitted and recognized by members of the Royal Academy. Ramanujan was a genius of direct inspiration, coming from the "ALL-THAT-IS", as I would call it. Others would maybe call it "The Divine", and that is fine with me. We all draw our inspirations from this same source, except that most people do not explicitly know it or acknowledge it.
Most history is written wrong. Same goes for internet. Thought I was just going to be watching another youtuber without facts.... Totally gobsmacked atm and want to know more. The best short video I've seen with so much story.
12 years ago i went to the library to gather information about Michael Faraday for my sons exam i was sucked in straight away i was in the room as he studied in candle light. i was using a desk top computer and in the corner was an add water as fuel.. 2 weeks later i had 1 cylinder out of 4 running on cracked water only briefly but it was enough for me so i spent the next 8 years on the electron what is it how does it work and ways to break the water bond,. looked for clues from quantum physics to astro physics it was a very enjoyable adventure. i have the mathematical model i might surprise myself one day and build it
Michael Faraday knew electromagnetism but because he can not demostrate it and his lack of Mathematical foundation it did not gain ground. Good thing a briliant physicist James Clerk Maxwell used his idea and formulated probably the most important equation in Physics. Maxwell dedicated his discovery to Faraday and confirmed the existence of EMW.
Coilombs law describes force in an one dimensional sense that the distance between the charges. Faraday imagined the space around a charge in a 3 dimensional sense and thought space as the electric field... which would propagate as எம் waves.. Thanks to his intuition.
Conservation of Spatial Curvature: Both Matter and Energy described as "Quanta" of Spatial Curvature. (A string is revealed to be a twisted cord when viewed up close.) Is there an alternative interpretation of "Asymptotic Freedom"? What if Quarks are actually made up of twisted tubes which become physically entangled with two other twisted tubes to produce a proton? Instead of the Strong Force being mediated by the constant exchange of gluons, it would be mediated by the physical entanglement of these twisted tubes. When only two twisted tubules are entangled, a meson is produced which is unstable and rapidly unwinds (decays) into something else. A proton would be analogous to three twisted rubber bands becoming entangled and the "Quarks" would be the places where the tubes are tangled together. The behavior would be the same as rubber balls (representing the Quarks) connected with twisted rubber bands being separated from each other or placed closer together producing the exact same phenomenon as "Asymptotic Freedom" in protons and neutrons. The force would become greater as the balls are separated, but the force would become less if the balls were placed closer together. Therefore, the gluon is a synthetic particle (zero mass, zero charge) invented to explain the Strong Force. An artificial Christmas tree can hold the ornaments in place, but it is not a real tree. String Theory was not a waste of time, because Geometry is the key to Math and Physics. However, can we describe Standard Model interactions using only one extra spatial dimension? What did some of the old clockmakers use to store the energy to power the clock? Was it a string or was it a spring? What if we describe subatomic particles as spatial curvature, instead of trying to describe General Relativity as being mediated by particles? Fixing the Standard Model with more particles is like trying to mend a torn fishing net with small rubber balls, instead of a piece of twisted twine. Quantum Entangled Twisted Tubules: “We are all agreed that your theory is crazy. The question which divides us is whether it is crazy enough to have a chance of being correct.” Neils Bohr (lecture on a theory of elementary particles given by Wolfgang Pauli in New York, c. 1957-8, in Scientific American vol. 199, no. 3, 1958) The following is meant to be a generalized framework for an extension of Kaluza-Klein Theory. Does it agree with some aspects of the “Twistor Theory” of Roger Penrose, and the work of Eric Weinstein on “Geometric Unity”, and the work of Dr. Lisa Randall on the possibility of one extra spatial dimension? During the early history of mankind, the twisting of fibers was used to produce thread, and this thread was used to produce fabrics. The twist of the thread is locked up within these fabrics. Is matter made up of twisted 3D-4D structures which store spatial curvature that we describe as “particles"? Are the twist cycles the "quanta" of Quantum Mechanics? When we draw a sine wave on a blackboard, we are representing spatial curvature. Does a photon transfer spatial curvature from one location to another? Wrap a piece of wire around a pencil and it can produce a 3D coil of wire, much like a spring. When viewed from the side it can look like a two-dimensional sine wave. You could coil the wire with either a right-hand twist, or with a left-hand twist. Could Planck's Constant be proportional to the twist cycles. A photon with a higher frequency has more energy. ( E=hf, More spatial curvature as the frequency increases = more Energy ). What if Quark/Gluons are actually made up of these twisted tubes which become entangled with other tubes to produce quarks where the tubes are entangled? (In the same way twisted electrical extension cords can become entangled.) Therefore, the gluons are a part of the quarks. Quarks cannot exist without gluons, and vice-versa. Mesons are made up of two entangled tubes (Quarks/Gluons), while protons and neutrons would be made up of three entangled tubes. (Quarks/Gluons) The "Color Charge" would be related to the XYZ coordinates (orientation) of entanglement. "Asymptotic Freedom", and "flux tubes" are logically based on this concept. The Dirac “belt trick” also reveals the concept of twist in the ½ spin of subatomic particles. If each twist cycle is proportional to h, we have identified the source of Quantum Mechanics as a consequence twist cycle geometry. Modern physicists say the Strong Force is mediated by a constant exchange of Gluons. The diagrams produced by some modern physicists actually represent the Strong Force like a spring connecting the two quarks. Asymptotic Freedom acts like real springs. Their drawing is actually more correct than their theory and matches perfectly to what I am saying in this model. You cannot separate the Gluons from the Quarks because they are a part of the same thing. The Quarks are the places where the Gluons are entangled with each other. Neutrinos would be made up of a twisted torus (like a twisted donut) within this model. The twist in the torus can either be Right-Hand or Left-Hand. Some twisted donuts can be larger than others, which can produce three different types of neutrinos. If a twisted tube winds up on one end and unwinds on the other end as it moves through space, this would help explain the “spin” of normal particles, and perhaps also the “Higgs Field”. However, if the end of the twisted tube joins to the other end of the twisted tube forming a twisted torus (neutrino), would this help explain “Parity Symmetry” violation in Beta Decay? Could the conversion of twist cycles to writhe cycles through the process of supercoiling help explain “neutrino oscillations”? Spatial curvature (mass) would be conserved, but the structure could change. ===================== Gravity is a result of a very small curvature imbalance within atoms. (This is why the force of gravity is so small.) Instead of attempting to explain matter as "particles", this concept attempts to explain matter more in the manner of our current understanding of the space-time curvature of gravity. If an electron has qualities of both a particle and a wave, it cannot be either one. It must be something else. Therefore, a "particle" is actually a structure which stores spatial curvature. Can an electron-positron pair (which are made up of opposite directions of twist) annihilate each other by unwinding into each other producing Gamma Ray photons? Does an electron travel through space like a threaded nut traveling down a threaded rod, with each twist cycle proportional to Planck’s Constant? Does it wind up on one end, while unwinding on the other end? Is this related to the Higgs field? Does this help explain the strange ½ spin of many subatomic particles? Does the 720 degree rotation of a 1/2 spin particle require at least one extra dimension? Alpha decay occurs when the two protons and two neutrons (which are bound together by entangled tubes), become un-entangled from the rest of the nucleons . Beta decay occurs when the tube of a down quark/gluon in a neutron becomes overtwisted and breaks producing a twisted torus (neutrino) and an up quark, and the ejected electron. The production of the torus may help explain the “Symmetry Violation” in Beta Decay, because one end of the broken tube section is connected to the other end of the tube produced, like a snake eating its tail. The phenomenon of Supercoiling involving twist and writhe cycles may reveal how overtwisted quarks can produce these new particles. The conversion of twists into writhes, and vice-versa, is an interesting process, which is also found in DNA molecules. Could the production of multiple writhe cycles help explain the three generations of quarks and neutrinos? If the twist cycles increase, the writhe cycles would also have a tendency to increase. Gamma photons are produced when a tube unwinds producing electromagnetic waves. ( Mass=1/Length ) The “Electric Charge” of electrons or positrons would be the result of one twist cycle being displayed at the 3D-4D surface interface of the particle. The physical entanglement of twisted tubes in quarks within protons and neutrons and mesons displays an overall external surface charge of an integer number. Because the neutrinos do not have open tube ends, (They are a twisted torus.) they have no overall electric charge. Within this model a black hole could represent a quantum of gravity, because it is one cycle of spatial gravitational curvature. Therefore, instead of a graviton being a subatomic particle it could be considered to be a black hole. The overall gravitational attraction would be caused by a very tiny curvature imbalance within atoms. In this model Alpha equals the compactification ratio within the twistor cone, which is approximately 1/137. 1= Hypertubule diameter at 4D interface 137= Cone’s larger end diameter at 3D interface where the photons are absorbed or emitted. The 4D twisted Hypertubule gets longer or shorter as twisting or untwisting occurs. (720 degrees per twist cycle.) How many neutrinos are left over from the Big Bang? They have a small mass, but they could be very large in number. Could this help explain Dark Matter? Why did Paul Dirac use the twist in a belt to help explain particle spin? Is Dirac’s belt trick related to this model? Is the “Quantum” unit based on twist cycles? I started out imagining a subatomic Einstein-Rosen Bridge whose internal surface is twisted with either a Right-Hand twist, or a Left-Hand twist producing a twisted 3D/4D membrane. This topological Soliton model grew out of that simple idea. I was also trying to imagine a way to stuff the curvature of a 3 D sine wave into subatomic particles. ------------------
🤔 I'm currently learning NLP, Stoicism & Cluster B Personalities Disorders. I'm starting to see Praxeology for what it is😭 I'm sort of becoming an Empirilist🙆♂️
That's not what I heard... elsewhere. Michael was hired, with the recommendation of Humphrey Davey, to be a dish washer at the Royal Academy at first. Only after some time did he get to actually have access to the academic side of this institution. He had no academic credentials at all, so a single scientist could not just decide to hire a boy from the street to be his assistant. These positions were decided upon by a collective of the board of the academy. Self-education is the only real education. Nobody can just "give" you knowledge, and you cannot "buy" it, either. Learning and understanding flow from an ever curious mind, in a person who is thirsty for answers to her/his questions. Such people do not care about social status. They follow their calling, they do not ask for permission to search, research and experiment. They just do it. Only you yourself can hinder your evolution, and only you yourself can further it. Nobody can stand in the way of our searching, unless we give somebody or some institution the authority to stop us. It is totally up to each one of us.
So beautifully inspirational and humbling 🥲 A lot of history's greats had unimaginably difficult early childhoods - Charles Dickens is just one who springs to mind. Really enjoy your videos, thank you 😊
Exactly. I don't know him. And books and research is suppressed now. You can't even compare. Strange how every country around the World but America has access to books.
I am a mathematician, and I do agree, self learning is unbeatable, I understand material much better and with deeper rigour than what professors can deliver in lecture halls. The message in this video is real.
Where do you research I’m looking to expand my find further and find myself only thinking of college
Thank you very much for your sharing
@@SlimeOhIm It is really quite simple: be your own teacher. Get books on the subjects you like and imagine that you are "two" people: the teacher and the student. I do this all the time, and it works! I studied music theory this way, I learned how to play the saxophone (played in several high-end community bands for 10 years!), and I also studied yoga and even quantum mechanics this same way.
Self learning is by far the best way of learning
A lonely path to becoming a master, but priceless.
Lonely indeed 😭 I'm not master though
@@madaraainna Someone needs to shit on your breakfast
📚
Thank you very much for your sharing
You've got so many examples of these people in your books. Please keep posting these biographies that relate to your work.
Please release more content like this Robert. Amazing!
More mastery videos please, I believe it will help a lot of young people of our generation. Thank you, Robert!
This is really excellent, lots of teachings.
Thank you Mr. Greene
Literally I got goosebumps listening to this incredible journey of Michael Faraday. Here I could draw some parallels with the great indian mathematician Srinivasa Ramanujan who was also an auto didact.
Yes, I was exactly thinking of him, too! This is the best example to demonstrate how hard it was/is to be admitted and recognized by members of the Royal Academy. Ramanujan was a genius of direct inspiration, coming from the "ALL-THAT-IS", as I would call it. Others would maybe call it "The Divine", and that is fine with me. We all draw our inspirations from this same source, except that most people do not explicitly know it or acknowledge it.
I wonder if Robert Greene realizes someone in the distant future will be speaking of him like he does these amazing people.
100 % 🥰🤗
“Mastery” is to me what the improvement of the mind was for Michael Faraday.
Well, you are nobody so...
@@madaraainna never said I was, but sending much love from Cali 🫶🏼
@@madaraainnawtf does that mean so rude
Always a pleasure to learn from Robert Greene
A real Master is
a Life long
Apprentice
Who told you that?
@@Otto-Just his mom
well said
Yes, 100% true
Thanks for the content Robert.
Thank you for watching.
I love Physics so i know this book will be wonderful. Luv ya, Mr. Greene for this wonderful knowledge of Mr. Faraday ❤
Best damn video I’ve seen in quite awhile now. It’s the self taught people from my experience who change the world in the best possible ways.
One of the best videos I watched on UA-cam.
Michael Faraday was my greatest discovery - humphrey davi
Fantastic conversation, Sir I need the full interview link.
Hope this helps if you haven't found it already. ua-cam.com/video/FcHXUDkmXK4/v-deo.html
Mr Greene your videos are pure gold for me thank U for uploading such valuable information💥
What a great story of Faraday.
Thank you for watching.
Thank you very much, Mr. Greene.
Most history is written wrong. Same goes for internet. Thought I was just going to be watching another youtuber without facts.... Totally gobsmacked atm and want to know more. The best short video I've seen with so much story.
Thank You , Sir
It would be incredible if you provided spanish subtitles so i can show it to all my hispanic friends
What a great story teller. 👍
Just saw your books . Excellent!
Thank you very much for your sharing
12 years ago i went to the library to gather information about Michael Faraday for my sons exam i was sucked in straight away i was in the room as he studied in candle light. i was using a desk top computer and in the corner was an add water as fuel.. 2 weeks later i had 1 cylinder out of 4 running on cracked water only briefly but it was enough for me so i spent the next 8 years on the electron what is it how does it work and ways to break the water bond,. looked for clues from quantum physics to astro physics it was a very enjoyable adventure. i have the mathematical model i might surprise myself one day and build it
Love this. Thank you.
Thanks for all the videos coming out lately, the floodgates are finally open for great content!
Thank You!
When you take action from the books you read, you will succeed
Michael Faraday knew electromagnetism but because he can not demostrate it and his lack of Mathematical foundation it did not gain ground. Good thing a briliant physicist James Clerk Maxwell used his idea and formulated probably the most important equation in Physics. Maxwell dedicated his discovery to Faraday and confirmed the existence of EMW.
What was the name of the book that Michael Faraday used to help him become self-taught?
Coilombs law describes force in an one dimensional sense that the distance between the charges. Faraday imagined the space around a charge in a 3 dimensional sense and thought space as the electric field... which would propagate as எம் waves.. Thanks to his intuition.
I'm sure there is a book explaining how to take notes and learn the correct way. I can't remember what the book is named
Great video, thank you very much , note to self(nts) watched all of it 3:10
Conservation of Spatial Curvature:
Both Matter and Energy described as "Quanta" of Spatial Curvature. (A string is revealed to be a twisted cord when viewed up close.)
Is there an alternative interpretation of "Asymptotic Freedom"? What if Quarks are actually made up of twisted tubes which become physically entangled with two other twisted tubes to produce a proton? Instead of the Strong Force being mediated by the constant exchange of gluons, it would be mediated by the physical entanglement of these twisted tubes. When only two twisted tubules are entangled, a meson is produced which is unstable and rapidly unwinds (decays) into something else. A proton would be analogous to three twisted rubber bands becoming entangled and the "Quarks" would be the places where the tubes are tangled together. The behavior would be the same as rubber balls (representing the Quarks) connected with twisted rubber bands being separated from each other or placed closer together producing the exact same phenomenon as "Asymptotic Freedom" in protons and neutrons. The force would become greater as the balls are separated, but the force would become less if the balls were placed closer together. Therefore, the gluon is a synthetic particle (zero mass, zero charge) invented to explain the Strong Force. An artificial Christmas tree can hold the ornaments in place, but it is not a real tree.
String Theory was not a waste of time, because Geometry is the key to Math and Physics. However, can we describe Standard Model interactions using only one extra spatial dimension? What did some of the old clockmakers use to store the energy to power the clock? Was it a string or was it a spring?
What if we describe subatomic particles as spatial curvature, instead of trying to describe General Relativity as being mediated by particles? Fixing the Standard Model with more particles is like trying to mend a torn fishing net with small rubber balls, instead of a piece of twisted twine.
Quantum Entangled Twisted Tubules:
“We are all agreed that your theory is crazy. The question which divides us is whether it is crazy enough to have a chance of being correct.” Neils Bohr
(lecture on a theory of elementary particles given by Wolfgang Pauli in New York, c. 1957-8, in Scientific American vol. 199, no. 3, 1958)
The following is meant to be a generalized framework for an extension of Kaluza-Klein Theory. Does it agree with some aspects of the “Twistor Theory” of Roger Penrose, and the work of Eric Weinstein on “Geometric Unity”, and the work of Dr. Lisa Randall on the possibility of one extra spatial dimension? During the early history of mankind, the twisting of fibers was used to produce thread, and this thread was used to produce fabrics. The twist of the thread is locked up within these fabrics. Is matter made up of twisted 3D-4D structures which store spatial curvature that we describe as “particles"? Are the twist cycles the "quanta" of Quantum Mechanics?
When we draw a sine wave on a blackboard, we are representing spatial curvature. Does a photon transfer spatial curvature from one location to another? Wrap a piece of wire around a pencil and it can produce a 3D coil of wire, much like a spring. When viewed from the side it can look like a two-dimensional sine wave. You could coil the wire with either a right-hand twist, or with a left-hand twist. Could Planck's Constant be proportional to the twist cycles. A photon with a higher frequency has more energy. ( E=hf, More spatial curvature as the frequency increases = more Energy ). What if Quark/Gluons are actually made up of these twisted tubes which become entangled with other tubes to produce quarks where the tubes are entangled? (In the same way twisted electrical extension cords can become entangled.) Therefore, the gluons are a part of the quarks. Quarks cannot exist without gluons, and vice-versa. Mesons are made up of two entangled tubes (Quarks/Gluons), while protons and neutrons would be made up of three entangled tubes. (Quarks/Gluons) The "Color Charge" would be related to the XYZ coordinates (orientation) of entanglement. "Asymptotic Freedom", and "flux tubes" are logically based on this concept. The Dirac “belt trick” also reveals the concept of twist in the ½ spin of subatomic particles. If each twist cycle is proportional to h, we have identified the source of Quantum Mechanics as a consequence twist cycle geometry.
Modern physicists say the Strong Force is mediated by a constant exchange of Gluons. The diagrams produced by some modern physicists actually represent the Strong Force like a spring connecting the two quarks. Asymptotic Freedom acts like real springs. Their drawing is actually more correct than their theory and matches perfectly to what I am saying in this model. You cannot separate the Gluons from the Quarks because they are a part of the same thing. The Quarks are the places where the Gluons are entangled with each other.
Neutrinos would be made up of a twisted torus (like a twisted donut) within this model. The twist in the torus can either be Right-Hand or Left-Hand. Some twisted donuts can be larger than others, which can produce three different types of neutrinos. If a twisted tube winds up on one end and unwinds on the other end as it moves through space, this would help explain the “spin” of normal particles, and perhaps also the “Higgs Field”. However, if the end of the twisted tube joins to the other end of the twisted tube forming a twisted torus (neutrino), would this help explain “Parity Symmetry” violation in Beta Decay? Could the conversion of twist cycles to writhe cycles through the process of supercoiling help explain “neutrino oscillations”? Spatial curvature (mass) would be conserved, but the structure could change.
=====================
Gravity is a result of a very small curvature imbalance within atoms. (This is why the force of gravity is so small.) Instead of attempting to explain matter as "particles", this concept attempts to explain matter more in the manner of our current understanding of the space-time curvature of gravity. If an electron has qualities of both a particle and a wave, it cannot be either one. It must be something else. Therefore, a "particle" is actually a structure which stores spatial curvature. Can an electron-positron pair (which are made up of opposite directions of twist) annihilate each other by unwinding into each other producing Gamma Ray photons?
Does an electron travel through space like a threaded nut traveling down a threaded rod, with each twist cycle proportional to Planck’s Constant? Does it wind up on one end, while unwinding on the other end? Is this related to the Higgs field? Does this help explain the strange ½ spin of many subatomic particles? Does the 720 degree rotation of a 1/2 spin particle require at least one extra dimension?
Alpha decay occurs when the two protons and two neutrons (which are bound together by entangled tubes), become un-entangled from the rest of the nucleons
. Beta decay occurs when the tube of a down quark/gluon in a neutron becomes overtwisted and breaks producing a twisted torus (neutrino) and an up quark, and the ejected electron. The production of the torus may help explain the “Symmetry Violation” in Beta Decay, because one end of the broken tube section is connected to the other end of the tube produced, like a snake eating its tail. The phenomenon of Supercoiling involving twist and writhe cycles may reveal how overtwisted quarks can produce these new particles. The conversion of twists into writhes, and vice-versa, is an interesting process, which is also found in DNA molecules. Could the production of multiple writhe cycles help explain the three generations of quarks and neutrinos? If the twist cycles increase, the writhe cycles would also have a tendency to increase.
Gamma photons are produced when a tube unwinds producing electromagnetic waves. ( Mass=1/Length )
The “Electric Charge” of electrons or positrons would be the result of one twist cycle being displayed at the 3D-4D surface interface of the particle. The physical entanglement of twisted tubes in quarks within protons and neutrons and mesons displays an overall external surface charge of an integer number. Because the neutrinos do not have open tube ends, (They are a twisted torus.) they have no overall electric charge.
Within this model a black hole could represent a quantum of gravity, because it is one cycle of spatial gravitational curvature. Therefore, instead of a graviton being a subatomic particle it could be considered to be a black hole. The overall gravitational attraction would be caused by a very tiny curvature imbalance within atoms.
In this model Alpha equals the compactification ratio within the twistor cone, which is approximately 1/137.
1= Hypertubule diameter at 4D interface
137= Cone’s larger end diameter at 3D interface where the photons are absorbed or emitted.
The 4D twisted Hypertubule gets longer or shorter as twisting or untwisting occurs. (720 degrees per twist cycle.)
How many neutrinos are left over from the Big Bang? They have a small mass, but they could be very large in number. Could this help explain Dark Matter?
Why did Paul Dirac use the twist in a belt to help explain particle spin? Is Dirac’s belt trick related to this model? Is the “Quantum” unit based on twist cycles?
I started out imagining a subatomic Einstein-Rosen Bridge whose internal surface is twisted with either a Right-Hand twist, or a Left-Hand twist producing a twisted 3D/4D membrane. This topological Soliton model grew out of that simple idea. I was also trying to imagine a way to stuff the curvature of a 3 D sine wave into subatomic particles.
------------------
this man can tell story well he should right books
Thank You
Well done here Sir
At HEC Paris, a management school... interesting
Great story. Michael Faraday used that David Goggins mentality
Powerful
#MASTERY, i have to listen to the Freddie Roach one. My nephew is a boxer, not an avid reader...
Hello robert from where should I get authentic purchase of your book " art of seduction"
If he is the father of electricity then how many books about the subject could have existed for him to read?
🤔 I'm currently learning NLP, Stoicism & Cluster B Personalities Disorders.
I'm starting to see Praxeology for what it is😭 I'm sort of becoming an Empirilist🙆♂️
What's the name of ''How to book from 18th century'' ?
The name is “improvement of the mind” by Dr. Isaac Watts
Full video please
If you haven't found it already, here it is. ua-cam.com/video/FcHXUDkmXK4/v-deo.html
I want to know that book Faraday read.
Bible
The improvement of the mind by Isaac Watts.
"the great mental models" is amazing too
@@desenhosincriveisoficial Hi...could you clarify the author please? I see one by Tommy Tedford and Another by Beaubien, and Parrish.
@@obunny3251 beaubien and parrish
IMO he was an Archangel15. Persistent in faith. Love him. His law of induction is the basis for how Tornados form.
How’s the meditating going Robert? Any nystical, unexplainable experiences?
Any link to meditation story of Mr Robert ?
What book was he reading? 👀
in Father and King Jesus' Name, Amen ✝️✨
A man you must follow this age
Genius
💛❤️
That's not what I heard... elsewhere. Michael was hired, with the recommendation of Humphrey Davey, to be a dish washer at the Royal Academy at first. Only after some time did he get to actually have access to the academic side of this institution. He had no academic credentials at all, so a single scientist could not just decide to hire a boy from the street to be his assistant. These positions were decided upon by a collective of the board of the academy.
Self-education is the only real education. Nobody can just "give" you knowledge, and you cannot "buy" it, either. Learning and understanding flow from an ever curious mind, in a person who is thirsty for answers to her/his questions. Such people do not care about social status. They follow their calling, they do not ask for permission to search, research and experiment. They just do it. Only you yourself can hinder your evolution, and only you yourself can further it. Nobody can stand in the way of our searching, unless we give somebody or some institution the authority to stop us. It is totally up to each one of us.
He sounds a bit like Sean Carroll, lol..."a bit"...I think I can feel a difference...
what's up with the french subtitles
♾️❤️♾️
So beautifully inspirational and humbling 🥲 A lot of history's greats had unimaginably difficult early childhoods - Charles Dickens is just one who springs to mind.
Really enjoy your videos, thank you 😊
Book of acts
My gifted son sent by the Lord Jesus Christ to my family told me ...Michael Faraday is his teacher in Heaven. Fyi
Berserk
Robert, I'd like to see you interview Mike Tyson
Exactly. I don't know him. And books and research is suppressed now. You can't even compare. Strange how every country around the World but America has access to books.
He was educated enough he could read and write, so not that poor 🤔
Sir I want to contact you for consulting
Thank you so much for telling this inspiring story of Faraday 🤍
Thank you