Muscles are activated by neurons. Neurons activate each other through release of neurotransmitters. It sounds like a fully determined system. Where is there any room for free will to step in?
@@faithbecauseofreason8381 Whatever the brain is doing, some of it takes place within neurons and some of it takes place between neurons. In each case, quite a bit is understood about the biochemistry involved. Does free will somehow cause chemical reactions inside individual neurons to temporarily deviate from the laws of chemistry? Does it make neurotransmitters flow between neurons in ways that are inconsistent with the laws of chemistry?
Hey could you provide a book list on the channel for different apologetic subjects. Gospel historicity, Jesus’s resurrection, philosophy of religion, etc.
Under causal closure physcalism, the reliability of inference ceases. This would be a critical blow to epistemology of a naturalist. Under determinism every thought and syllogism we create, the links we perceive that connect the premises to cnclusion are predetermined. In indeterminism, if its random, then how can one be justified in belief? Free will seems to be an antimony and hence there is no positive argument for or against it that really succeeds
… there is never really a simple solution; timshel, there is and isn’t usually! My Buddha Christ logic: throw in a bit of everything. No single solution is ever the solution, timshel! There is and isn’t often a single solution: throw in a bit of everything!! X
Good work I've never been impressed by inferences to physicalism or determinism from neuroscience
brilliant channel ❤
Muscles are activated by neurons. Neurons activate each other through release of neurotransmitters. It sounds like a fully determined system. Where is there any room for free will to step in?
Presumably the free will of an agent would decide which muscles are activated by which neurons.
@@faithbecauseofreason8381 Whatever the brain is doing, some of it takes place within neurons and some of it takes place between neurons. In each case, quite a bit is understood about the biochemistry involved. Does free will somehow cause chemical reactions inside individual neurons to temporarily deviate from the laws of chemistry? Does it make neurotransmitters flow between neurons in ways that are inconsistent with the laws of chemistry?
@@mytwocents7481 I don't see why there would have to be a deviation from the laws of nature.
@@faithbecauseofreason8381If free will is anything more than the laws of chemistry, wouldn't it occasionally have to be at odds with those laws?
@@mytwocents7481 I don't see why it would.
Hey could you provide a book list on the channel for different apologetic subjects. Gospel historicity, Jesus’s resurrection, philosophy of religion, etc.
I usually include such a list in my video descriptions when I cite my sources.
Under causal closure physcalism, the reliability of inference ceases.
This would be a critical blow to epistemology of a naturalist.
Under determinism every thought and syllogism we create, the links we perceive that connect the premises to cnclusion are predetermined.
In indeterminism, if its random, then how can one be justified in belief?
Free will seems to be an antimony and hence there is no positive argument for or against it that really succeeds
Neo - the anomaly of all anomalies!
Neo, anagram of ONE, and the oracle considered if he was The One!! Means NEW! X
… I “give in” … I surrender! X
Call non emergency police! 👮!!! X
… I am Kurt Cobain!! [No emoji].
Lmfao 😹!! I am agent causation!!
- Jim Morrison.
… there is never really a simple solution; timshel, there is and isn’t usually!
My Buddha Christ logic: throw in a bit of everything.
No single solution is ever the solution, timshel!
There is and isn’t often a single solution: throw in a bit of everything!! X
Smoke cannabis and be my disciple.
Lmfao 😹!! X