A Very Exciting New Chart Library

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 7 лип 2024
  • Shadcn/ui keeps paying dividends. Doing charts right is hard, so hyped we have a great starting point in React now.
    SOURCE
    ui.shadcn.com/charts
    Check out my Twitch, Twitter, Discord more at t3.gg
    S/O Ph4se0n3 for the awesome edit 🙏
    S/O Ben Davis for the thumbnail 🙏
  • Наука та технологія

КОМЕНТАРІ • 194

  • @raduflp
    @raduflp 12 днів тому +81

    More credits should be given to Recharts team, shadcn contribution is just a very thin wrapper. Nevertheless, now recharts will get more eyes on it and hopefully improve faster.

    • @cwirus99
      @cwirus99 12 днів тому +8

      This. I have used recharts alot recently and can confirm that shadcn didn't change much, apart from styling and making it play with the UI library nicely. Still, I do appreciate everything shadcn does - I love the UI library and am using it for almost oll of my projects!

  • @gomattcode
    @gomattcode 12 днів тому +44

    Don't forget about the Charts library I made for Flutter: Flarts

    • @idslw3489
      @idslw3489 12 днів тому +21

      You really missed an opportunity to name it Farts...

    • @follantic
      @follantic 12 днів тому

      Flart is better. Sounds like a slow and gusty fart, just like holding the L.

  • @zeroliuxiyuan
    @zeroliuxiyuan 12 днів тому +10

    Shadcn/ui did a great job consolidating these information together but worth calling out that most of the good stuff that Theo calls out in this video is mainly about Rechart the library. You can go very far with Rechart as-is if you are not on the shadcn/ui stack.

  • @abhishekvash
    @abhishekvash 12 днів тому +68

    Apache ECharts is probably the best thing that most people haven’t discovered yet

    • @RandomGuy-jv4vd
      @RandomGuy-jv4vd 12 днів тому +1

      People are sleeping on this and I also recently discovered this chart lib while tinkering with kafka :D

    • @kylerjohnson988
      @kylerjohnson988 12 днів тому +5

      Wow. Yeah, I've never heard of it but it looks awesome. One of the biggest struggles I have with d3 is that I feel like I'm constantly fighting a typescript type battle. How does Apache ECharts play with typescript?

    • @florentd.5817
      @florentd.5817 12 днів тому +1

      You're right. Apache echarts is the best opensource. Chartjs is for kiddo

    • @TheKaosTux
      @TheKaosTux 11 днів тому

      Thank you for this! Unbelievable I haven’t notice this before.
      Looks like it can everything, actually everything.

    • @hasithapriyasad
      @hasithapriyasad 9 днів тому

      agree

  • @Minepuffik
    @Minepuffik 13 днів тому +85

    It’s not chart library bruh

    • @TheBswan
      @TheBswan 12 днів тому +7

      Welcome to UA-cam, it's mostly clickbait (because the non-clickbait doesn't sell)

    • @Minepuffik
      @Minepuffik 12 днів тому +2

      @@TheBswan I already knew it was about shadcn because there was nothing else in info field lol

    • @cbelleau256
      @cbelleau256 12 днів тому +3

      Technically, it is a library. It's an organized collection of different types of charts which you can browse through and use within your own projects.

    • @user-ud8hw4gp6t
      @user-ud8hw4gp6t 12 днів тому +1

      i wanted to comment "just learn d3" and now im hearing its not even a chart library????? god

    • @Minepuffik
      @Minepuffik 11 днів тому +1

      @@cbelleau256 it’s not new chart library in any way

  • @aleksd286
    @aleksd286 12 днів тому +30

    Recharts literally looks like that by default with proper color config, nothing new. Don't understand the huge praise

    • @hamzasaleem1537
      @hamzasaleem1537 12 днів тому +3

      First of all, thank you for putting your words out there.
      I have one word for you. "Code Aesthetic".

  • @colin_actually
    @colin_actually 13 днів тому +29

    It's the dark theme that really makes them look so dang good. The other chart sample galleries are usually light.

  • @linuxguy1199
    @linuxguy1199 12 днів тому +45

    As a C programmer, I'd just load in OpenGL and generate it all using triangles and a basic shader.

    • @_DATA_EXPUNGED_
      @_DATA_EXPUNGED_ 12 днів тому +26

      ... then, after a couple memory leaks and bunch of segfaults thanks to dangling pointers, throw it out and rewrite in rust. Or zig.
      scnr.

    • @danisob3633
      @danisob3633 12 днів тому +21

      "as someone who likes to waste time doing things that arent needed"
      "when i was young we would use handmade spears to go out hunting"
      "i built this chair by myself in 100 hours to save myself some money"

    • @musashi542
      @musashi542 12 днів тому

      Lmao​@@danisob3633

    • @NadjibSamsung
      @NadjibSamsung 12 днів тому

      What a madlad

    • @HorizonHuntxr
      @HorizonHuntxr 12 днів тому +4

      "As a C programmer ☝🏼🤓"

  • @orcdev
    @orcdev 13 днів тому +37

    Chadcn is killing it! Can't wait next release, that sidebar is going to be awesome! ⚔

    • @khao_yt
      @khao_yt 12 днів тому +2

      what a chad

  • @jcros_
    @jcros_ 12 днів тому +5

    its recharts bruh

  • @igorordecha
    @igorordecha 8 днів тому +1

    5:28 anything beyond that would be astronomically stupid because English is not the only language in the world.
    I remember that some stupid library/framework for GraphQL back in the day(i dont remember which one) had implemented English noun pluralization rules in the library itself. You were supposed to write your schema in singular form and it "was smart enough" to generate plural names for collections of those objects. I loved my "pracowniks" and "grupaPracownikows" arrays (not really).

  • @yuryzhuravlev2312
    @yuryzhuravlev2312 12 днів тому +4

    what about Svelte support?

  • @imdefnotash
    @imdefnotash 12 днів тому +3

    what's the theme and the font he uses?

  • @ustav_o
    @ustav_o 12 днів тому +3

    missed the opportunity to use the chartcn/ui in the thumbnail

  • @dmitriimakarkin5229
    @dmitriimakarkin5229 12 днів тому +2

    Check apache e-charts (having react wrapper). Not that hyped, but easy to use and very configurable, made with canvas

  • @dmitriistukalov4870
    @dmitriistukalov4870 13 днів тому +6

    I used recharts on multiple different projects and recommend everyone to try, you can literally do anything with not much effort

  • @jasmeetbrar8609
    @jasmeetbrar8609 12 днів тому +1

    Ah this is awesome! Sadly it doesn’t have Sankey graphs, so I still have to rely on D3 for that.

  • @apomv
    @apomv 13 днів тому +8

    Being too early is a crime

  • @arogueotaku
    @arogueotaku 13 днів тому +9

    The idea behind shadcn sounds cool, but I don't get how the components folder would stay organized if everyone just goes in and adds / edits their own component. Maybe I'm completely wrong but I can see it becoming a complete mess in a large team.
    And also If I have to install some packages then I would rather install a component library. But I think I'm missing something there too.

    • @dobroslav.radosavljevic
      @dobroslav.radosavljevic 13 днів тому +12

      It's overhyped. Get kinda messy and you will spend a lot of time making something custom, which already exists in library like Mantine. Mantine is much better and feature complete.

    • @smoked-old-fashioned-hh7lo
      @smoked-old-fashioned-hh7lo 12 днів тому

      ​@@dobroslav.radosavljevic everything is overhyped in javascript land. i can't wait for them to reinvent component libraries in 2025.

    • @vintage8
      @vintage8 12 днів тому

      @@dobroslav.radosavljevic exactly, shadcn overrated af

    • @hello19286
      @hello19286 12 днів тому +2

      @@dobroslav.radosavljevic That's the whole point of it, customizability. Sometimes you don't want to spend hours reading documentation figuring out a hacky way to customize a component in Mantine/pick a component library when your designer wants a very specific change that is not supported.

    • @dobroslav.radosavljevic
      @dobroslav.radosavljevic 12 днів тому

      @@hello19286 You can customize Mantine too. It's highly customizable via Provider or component props. You can even use Mantine as headless framework and style everything by yourself with taiwind or anything else.
      It has awesome prebuilt components, which cover almost every use-case you might need in your applications. If not, you can easily build your own. There is a big community and a lot of community packages around Mantine for different components and integrations with libraries.
      I prefer this over shadcn. And I build whole startup with shadcn. And I also built a lot of applications from scratch with Mantine. So I have good comparison how Mantine is much better.
      But still my opinion. Other people just don't like Mantine because of design I guess.

  • @luizhenrique187
    @luizhenrique187 12 днів тому +5

    I don't know, i will still use echarts over this, and the animations from this charts already exists in things like apexcharts, over all i didn't understand what is so different about this library

  • @hqcart1
    @hqcart1 12 днів тому

    how much memory?
    how fast is it?

  • @gu5e
    @gu5e 12 днів тому +9

    im building an analytics tool, then i saw this

    • @parisosuch7326
      @parisosuch7326 12 днів тому +1

      use Tremor, it looks better than this and also built with tailwind

    • @gu5e
      @gu5e 12 днів тому

      @@parisosuch7326 the disease?

    • @gu5e
      @gu5e 12 днів тому

      @@parisosuch7326 no im kidding, but it looks promising

    • @NaThAncient
      @NaThAncient 12 днів тому

      Just looking at Tremor’s line graph, selecting a node does (like chadcn) shows a popover with the selected value, however, the popover isn’t smart enough to not block the actual point on the graph. Chadcn’s popover actually moves away to the side.

  • @1titicarabina
    @1titicarabina 12 днів тому

    yes and i installed daisyui because u recommended and now i have to change to shadcn because of u again

  • @TomisaburoRMizugawa
    @TomisaburoRMizugawa 12 днів тому +1

    Is it CDN only? Not being able to download it is a dealbreaker for me ...

  • @patrickaikonia853
    @patrickaikonia853 12 днів тому +1

    I love Shadcn because it gets rid of the need to design frontend component and rather focus on the application logic and interactions of your site. Game changes for people who are not even doing UI/UX design

  • @mycloudvip
    @mycloudvip 11 днів тому

    awesome video! thanks

  • @helleye311
    @helleye311 12 днів тому +2

    Shad charts? Sign me up!
    I like recharts in terms of functionality, but the DX is just awful. Data forrmats are weird, there's no proper typescript etc. Nice wrapper around that, that also does beautiful styles sounds great.

  • @ElFrontend
    @ElFrontend 12 днів тому

    What I like most about shadcn is that it is taking the best available tools, such as Recharts, and building a robust ecosystem based on its design system. Good Review @Theo

    • @ElFrontend
      @ElFrontend 12 днів тому +1

      I must say that the merit of shadcn in this case is changing the styles of Recharts and including it in its ecosystem, because basically all the work is done by Recharts.

  • @shashankdwivedi6388
    @shashankdwivedi6388 8 днів тому

    what hair product do you use?

  • @wshewm
    @wshewm 13 днів тому +19

    I still think mantine has a 200x better DX than shadcn. I’ve tried to give it a real shot on new projects multiple times due to the hype train surrounding it but I always end up going back to mantine

    • @theshy6717
      @theshy6717 13 днів тому +1

      I don’t agree

    • @WojtekPoroslo
      @WojtekPoroslo 13 днів тому +7

      I'm on the other side of the spectrum. Can't stand mantine - it's just mui reincarnated to me. Sure, it's better than mui, but the philosophy behind is the same: the library and the component drive and decide UI - they are hard to extend and configure outside of what authors have allowed. 11 colors in your palette? or 8? well, you're outta luck, you'll have to fight mantine from the get go. headless ui libraries are so so so so much better in that regard. you use what you want and how you want. you style in whatever style suits you. there's fewer layers of abstraction between you and end html elements rendered on screen. you're commanding your ui to much greater extent than with mantine, chakra, mui...

    • @wshewm
      @wshewm 13 днів тому

      @@theshy6717 I’d love to hear more about your experience. What projects have you used it on? Anything enterprise level?

    • @wshewm
      @wshewm 13 днів тому

      @@WojtekPoroslo I appreciate your perspective and understand the premise of your message! One thing to note is that you can easily extend the color palette and every single component's styles extensively using the themeing solutions mantine has to offer. However, you're right, its themeing features is obviously not on the level of a headless library.

    • @DanielBogusz
      @DanielBogusz 12 днів тому +1

      Because you are missing the point of those two. Shadcn is for making component libraries where you edit the scaffolded code to your needs. Mantine is just another ready to use component library.

  • @QueeeeenZ
    @QueeeeenZ 12 днів тому +1

    A Nuxt example would be nice

  • @CodeJan
    @CodeJan 12 днів тому +1

    I think you should invite shadcn to a deep interview...

  • @richardhaddadau
    @richardhaddadau 12 днів тому

    I'm sold. Making charts sucks a lot so knowing Shadcn has a simpler way, why not.
    Thanks for the video.

  • @garcipat
    @garcipat 12 днів тому

    would be cool to be able to have a map with interactive areas like with polygons.

  • @maximilianlauberger1729
    @maximilianlauberger1729 12 днів тому

    Dumb question:
    Would this work aswell for me angular project?

    • @wingsaber629
      @wingsaber629 12 днів тому

      No... it's using React.

    • @maximilianlauberger1729
      @maximilianlauberger1729 11 днів тому

      @@wingsaber629 i know but that would be really cool if that would work for angular

  • @bernicefenton
    @bernicefenton 12 днів тому

    firefox was just chilling.

  • @Aditya_Vyas
    @Aditya_Vyas 12 днів тому

    Indeed ShadCN is amazing.

  • @xReTuneSx
    @xReTuneSx 11 днів тому

    5:54 what is the shortcut for that selection method in vscode?

    • @nikolayhmn
      @nikolayhmn 9 днів тому

      hold Alt while clicking with the left mouse button

  • @italobarros.me31
    @italobarros.me31 13 днів тому

    Nice

  • @vissaf
    @vissaf 12 днів тому

    Recharts is pretty customisable itself? And easy to customise too? Why this?

  • @NubeBuster
    @NubeBuster 6 днів тому

    What an exciting time to be a (web) developer

  • @brpapa
    @brpapa 12 днів тому

    What is your vscode theme?

    • @alexh2665
      @alexh2665 12 днів тому

      Poimandres theme.

  • @martijn3151
    @martijn3151 12 днів тому

    Animations are always the first thing I switch off when using charts.

  • @plusplus940
    @plusplus940 8 днів тому

    shadcn is like... example code of other libraries with an installer?

  • @bojidaryovchev9995
    @bojidaryovchev9995 12 днів тому

    echarts is the most advanced charts library you will ever need, its battle-tested and its not even hard to use

  • @artificiyal
    @artificiyal 12 днів тому

    shadcn slowly becoming my sanity pill, with these updates

  • @spiderico00
    @spiderico00 12 днів тому

    Giga Shad

  • @chopstickschop
    @chopstickschop 13 днів тому +5

    Apache ECharts all the way

    • @MrJloa
      @MrJloa 12 днів тому

      Hell no. We use em v5 in production. Trying to migrate atm, they lag as hell in svg render

    • @chopstickschop
      @chopstickschop 12 днів тому

      @@MrJloa in my experience SVG starts to lag if you work with many datapoints. echarts has a sampling parameter that can help with performance. you could also switch to canvas if you want. our team uses echarts to display scope signals with millions of datapoints with no issues.

  • @codeChuck
    @codeChuck 8 днів тому

    15:30 'Randomly generated data' to support the point of view :) LOL, I though you gathered some real data about usage of those frameworks?

  • @fallenpentagon1579
    @fallenpentagon1579 12 днів тому

    So not a library?

  • @a1x5h04
    @a1x5h04 12 днів тому

    Chadcn ftw!

  • @danielbetancur1250
    @danielbetancur1250 10 днів тому

    Wow another library. Surely this will be the one to change the game.

  • @cogulad1067
    @cogulad1067 11 днів тому

    when is someone going to make sum like this for flutter

  • @abdullahyaqoob3741
    @abdullahyaqoob3741 12 днів тому

    If Shadcn adding Map chart that will +++

  • @mickolesmana5899
    @mickolesmana5899 12 днів тому

    chadcn

  • @miletadulovic577
    @miletadulovic577 12 днів тому

    Except, it is not chart library. Just presets for recharts

  • @brawlrob0
    @brawlrob0 12 днів тому

    theo, it's not shad, it's shadcn!

  • @CraigMcNicholas
    @CraigMcNicholas 12 днів тому

    So we installed card and button and chart to add a chart...
    We then manage the deps for all those...
    We then do what people are saying shadcn is good for... Alter a component directly for ultimate customisation... So we modify Card.
    Now our chart looks like shit and you go through again making everything look right.
    Honestly whoever thought copy pasting full component sets into a project is a good idea never worked on a project woth more than 10 views.

  • @ivank6486
    @ivank6486 12 днів тому

    Missed opportunity to call it shards

  • @mpoapostolis9110
    @mpoapostolis9110 7 днів тому

    "New chart Library"

  • @farzadmf
    @farzadmf 12 днів тому

    I'm yet to use shadcn, but I have a confusion: if I'm not mistaken, it allows you to copy/paste a component to "make it yours".
    Doesn't that mean that basically, we'll be storing a "snapshot" of the library at the time? One good thing with UI frameworks is that they get updated, add features, etc., but if we copy/paste the thing, we're basically stuck with a verion almost forever.
    Is that how it works?

    • @lpbayliss
      @lpbayliss 12 днів тому +2

      There is an (experimental) diff command that lets you see what has changed in a newer version of a component. If you've customised the component you can pick and choose what you want/ need from the diff. If you haven't made any changes can also just import the new version and repalce the old.

    • @subhajitkundu7546
      @subhajitkundu7546 12 днів тому +1

      We don't really copy paste the entire library. We copy individual components that we need from the library. Normally with updates in UI libraries they add new components. Existing components hardly get updated if they are made well in the first go and are feature complete, which they usually are.
      So with ShadCN you can copy paste whatever component you need and as new component gets added to the library, you can add that as well. And if by any chance the existing component needs an update, they have command line tools to update everything that needs to be updated with one command. But you'll almost never need to do that.
      Hope that answers your doubt.

    • @farzadmf
      @farzadmf 11 днів тому

      That seems like a useful tool (and honestly necessary IMO)

    • @farzadmf
      @farzadmf 11 днів тому

      @@subhajitkundu7546 Thank you for the detailed answer. Makes sense

    • @plusplus940
      @plusplus940 8 днів тому +1

      it's kind of a lie - shadcn still installs the dependency. shad is more like example apps with an installer

  • @florentd.5817
    @florentd.5817 12 днів тому

    Apache echarts is the best opensource.

  • @mohabedr5030
    @mohabedr5030 13 днів тому +129

    I'm out. Charts should not be rendered with SVG. Instead, we have HTML Canvas, which can run complex animations at a higher frame rate.

    • @okkashaally2115
      @okkashaally2115 12 днів тому +38

      You know nothing about modern web animations

    • @KieranMahoney
      @KieranMahoney 12 днів тому +4

      Your right

    • @RedStone576
      @RedStone576 12 днів тому +6

      you're right

    • @mohabedr5030
      @mohabedr5030 12 днів тому

      @@okkashaally2115 Modern web animation has nothing to do with charts, I'm saying that charts should not be rendered using SVG or even HTML UI, in fact if you open the shadcn beautiful charts page you will see that the page is lagging as hell.

    • @LtdJorge
      @LtdJorge 12 днів тому +33

      There are many trade-offs between the two. Canvas is faster, however it doesn't let you inspect, it's not HTML. SVG let's you attach any node to any of its nodes.

  • @hasithapriyasad
    @hasithapriyasad 9 днів тому

    im an Apache EChart Fan Boy

  • @codewithshriekdj
    @codewithshriekdj 13 днів тому

    I will try this new charts by shadcn

  • @teenspirit8714
    @teenspirit8714 12 днів тому +1

    dude, rechart's pool is so poor. look at apache echarts

  • @DevLeonardo
    @DevLeonardo 13 днів тому +5

    06:44 value is always 999 => not a straight line 👀

    • @kangar1797
      @kangar1797 12 днів тому +3

      probably went back and varied the values during the live stream and edit it out

    • @anhvunguyen7935
      @anhvunguyen7935 12 днів тому +3

      Its stacked

    • @DevLeonardo
      @DevLeonardo 12 днів тому

      @@anhvunguyen7935 ah, that's right :D

    • @steffengroenandersen
      @steffengroenandersen 12 днів тому

      @@kangar1797 When he hovers over the data labels they all say 999 though.

    • @kangar1797
      @kangar1797 12 днів тому +1

      @@steffengroenandersen you're right! in that case maybe there is also a "scale" value that needs to be changed?

  • @0brooo
    @0brooo 12 днів тому +1

    I wish that “Theos UA-cam channel” was a valid response to “how do you keep up with technology” in an interview lol.

    • @cyrus01337
      @cyrus01337 12 днів тому

      There's definitely other places you can look while throwing in similar tech influencer's to the list, just don't mention them or your sources until asked obviously. :^)

  • @fu886
    @fu886 12 днів тому

    >320 packages as base set of dependencies
    ewww

  • @grandpowr
    @grandpowr 12 днів тому +1

    Recharts is extremely flexible. Compared to ChartJS that made me bang my head on the wall all the time, that in my job I begged to refactor all our charts with Recharts and it was so easy to do.

  • @Cyanide300
    @Cyanide300 12 днів тому

    " *349* packages installed "...for some friggen charts.
    You know, if you wrote like 20% of the code that makes your project do what it does, and the other 80% was imported, is it really *your* project at that point? If I put together some Ikea furniture, am I a furniture maker? Am I the same as the guy who cut raw lumber into shape, sanded it, finished it, and fit it together into a piece of furniture? I think some of the imposter syndrome a lot of web developers have comes from the fact that you wanted to be like the carpenter, and you let people think you're like the carpenter, but really most of what you do is more like assembling Ikea furniture.

  • @lauracamellini7999
    @lauracamellini7999 3 дні тому

    D3 is difficult to beat man

  • @portalpacific4578
    @portalpacific4578 12 днів тому +1

    Comparing the power of d3.js to shadcn charts is so dumb lol

  • @aberba
    @aberba 12 днів тому +1

    UA-camrs 😂

  • @BobbySmithUX
    @BobbySmithUX 10 днів тому

    Shadcn Charts..... codename Sharts? 😂

  • @LeoPlaw
    @LeoPlaw 12 днів тому +2

    I was excited for a moment, until I checked and found that it was built upon Recharts, which is built upon React, so it is somewhat bloated.

  • @smoked-old-fashioned-hh7lo
    @smoked-old-fashioned-hh7lo 12 днів тому +3

    oh yeah, we definitely needed yet another charts library. wouldn't it be great to get 20 more before next year. true innovation in the javascript community.

  • @winfle
    @winfle 12 днів тому +2

    I really enjoy your channel.
    Being a Ukrainian, I suffer from electricity shutdowns, and the first thing I usually do after a shutdown, I check your channel.
    Thank you, you really help me to stay motivated

  • @gabmirdev
    @gabmirdev 11 днів тому +1

    It's not a chart library, doesn't compare to any of the libraries mentioned at the beginning. For animations they're only using css, lucide is an icon library. This is probably the most clickbaity channel I've ever seen.

  • @Dedydamy
    @Dedydamy 8 днів тому

    Apache Echarts > every other one

  • @itsmenewbie03
    @itsmenewbie03 13 днів тому

    Early.

  • @djenntt
    @djenntt 12 днів тому +1

    We can always count on Theo dumping low quality content every day 👍

  • @philadams9254
    @philadams9254 12 днів тому +1

    I don't see anything new or unique about this

  • @micha8099
    @micha8099 4 дні тому

    tbh, still just another chart lib. And i am still a highcharts fan, especially with real big data sets.

  • @avi7278
    @avi7278 12 днів тому

    Section on V0 for thumbnails

  • @PootCoinSol
    @PootCoinSol 12 днів тому

    Ayye just what I needed to display my memecoin chart in a sleek way xD

  • @snurdool8131
    @snurdool8131 13 днів тому

    first

  • @adrianorocha-dev
    @adrianorocha-dev 12 днів тому

    05:15 Brazil (Luiz Gonzaga) mentioned??

  • @ericnail1
    @ericnail1 10 днів тому

    You are 100% wrong, the language they used was absolutely political. They are 100% correct to reject political wording and you are being a coward to appease the woke. Normal people do not get upset with such unimportant matters, nor call them “outdated male language”.

  • @blinking_dodo
    @blinking_dodo 13 днів тому +10

    "Wait, i need a button, let's install the "button" package!"
    Utterly deranged.
    HTML5 has it's own tag...

    • @arogueotaku
      @arogueotaku 13 днів тому +6

      It's not a package. smh. Also have you not ever used a component library?

    • @BarisPalabiyik
      @BarisPalabiyik 13 днів тому +3

      Oh shit really? Fellas we had the button element all along right under our nose :O

    • @AndrewTSq
      @AndrewTSq 13 днів тому

      lol yes. no wonder why JS sucks these days.

    • @developer217
      @developer217 13 днів тому

      @@arogueotaku its just styled radix

    • @sidarthg2477
      @sidarthg2477 13 днів тому +2

      Good luck making sure that it is accessible in all browsers. It is not as simple as with some css classes

  • @emonymph6911
    @emonymph6911 12 днів тому

    devs suck at analytics... no double y axis on line charts is pathetic - stick to your basements