The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy Examination

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 3 гру 2024

КОМЕНТАРІ • 51

  • @TheMarcHicks
    @TheMarcHicks 6 років тому +41

    I read an intriguing theory about 42 once. Apparently, in ASCII language, 42 is an asterisk. In computing the asterisk is used as a "Wildcard", or anything at all. So the idea of 42 being the answer is that it is, in effect.....Whatever you want it to be!

    • @seatspud
      @seatspud 6 років тому +1

      I've always considered The Joker (the Bat-villain, not just the playing card!) the same way. "Multiple choice past" and all that.
      Also, this year, I turn 42. Nice, huh?

    • @colinp2238
      @colinp2238 6 років тому +1

      @@Phyrior 54 actually 7x6=42.

    • @Phyrior
      @Phyrior 6 років тому +2

      Somebody clearly didn't read the sequel. :P

    • @krisbennett8456
      @krisbennett8456 3 роки тому

      It's nonsense. He looked out a window and thought, 42?

  • @MegaAwesomeNick
    @MegaAwesomeNick 6 років тому +21

    "A ridiculously brilliant plot convenience" perfect descriptions for the book right there. That could be one of the blurbs on the back of the novel.

    • @Edgewalker001
      @Edgewalker001 6 років тому

      It's basically the reverse of the deus ex machina. While simultaneously being a machine that fits all your plot needs. So I guess it's a machine without the god inside. I guess you could call it a plot elevator? XD

  • @Quadr44t
    @Quadr44t Рік тому

    Watched the first two book examinations. Really like your take, and elaborate about Adams and give some context about his writing process.

  • @bonecanoe86
    @bonecanoe86 6 років тому +10

    This series was a big influence on me as a teenager!

    • @tipulsar85
      @tipulsar85 6 років тому

      Imagine seeing the TV version at the age of 3-4. Then by 3rd grade having seen both it and the making of enough times to have the dialogue memorized, only to find the books were a different view on the subject.

  • @wolf1066
    @wolf1066 3 роки тому +2

    The fact that the Vogons pretty much echo Prosser shows exactly how very "like us" they are. Prosser has no sympathy for Arthur as "[he] had plenty of time to make a formal complaint" because the plans had been _on display_ in the bottom of a locked filing cabinet stuck in a disused lavatory (in an unlit and inaccessible basement) with a sign on the door saying "Beware of the Leopard" for *months* and the Vogons likewise have no sympathy for the inhabitants of Earth because the plans had been on display at Alpha Centauri - a mere 4.5 light years away - for years.

  • @myriadmediamusings
    @myriadmediamusings 6 років тому +4

    This is perfect timing as I just watched that 5-part look at Douglas Adams. This is a good tie-in.
    It's a crying shame that Douglas passed on. Had he continued I'm sure more great works could've been produced. Heck I'd be interested to see what a New Who Douglas Adams story would look like.

    • @toshiyaar7885
      @toshiyaar7885 5 років тому

      Have you read Dirk Huntley detective series?

    • @moodydude6790
      @moodydude6790 4 роки тому +1

      I feel the same for people like Jim Henson & Dermot Morgan even

  • @beardedroofer
    @beardedroofer 4 роки тому +1

    Awesome book, good movie. When I read it, I couldn't help but think of an ant colony in a field. And its destruction when the farmer tills it. Same concept as the interstellar bypass.

  • @AJUniverse
    @AJUniverse 6 років тому +3

    I'm glad you mentioned the babelfish gag specifically. It's one of my favorite jokes in anything.

  • @billc.4584
    @billc.4584 5 років тому

    I very much enjoyed the novel. Kinda' spoke to me. Nice presentation and I plan on watching the series. Thank you. :)

  • @solosailorsv8065
    @solosailorsv8065 4 роки тому +1

    The novel was so good i almost lost my job from being unable to put it down, or resist its pull, during breaks.

  • @HiroshiMizushima
    @HiroshiMizushima 5 років тому +3

    Remember how amazing the radio story was, and then actually reading the first book.. comparing it to Monty Python seems exactly right. I scratched my head a bit after reading the first book, given that it really doesn't end on a proper note due to the nature of the story. It wasn't until the second book that I found my footing with them.
    This is like my simultaneous love and hate for the Monty Python films which tend to tell fun and interesting stories and then peter out by the end.. if they got that far. My utter detest for the end of Holy Grail contrasts nicely to my delight at the rest of the movie. Thank goodness the people doing the rest of the radio show came up with a truly satisfying conclusion to the final story.

    • @Asahamana
      @Asahamana 4 роки тому +1

      I remember reading the entire book series and listened the radio show and I was dissapointed that they didnt tell what the ultimate question to wich answer was 42 was.
      Then I started to actually think about it and I fell like a sucker and then I got the whole thing 😅

    • @esecallum
      @esecallum 3 роки тому

      i remember that 10:30 radio slot or was it 11:00 on r4? i had to go to uni in the morning and kept awake to listen to it..

  • @toweypat
    @toweypat 6 років тому

    Best SF series ever.

  • @gagaplex
    @gagaplex 6 років тому

    How nice and quite timely: I read this book in German and English and am currently listening to the audiobook on my daily commute.

    • @ZipplyZane
      @ZipplyZane 6 років тому +1

      Have you ever heard the original radio version? Honestly, I think you might like it better than an audio book, since you won't know exactly what's going to happen.

  • @JallenMeodia
    @JallenMeodia 6 років тому

    Man, I had forgotten about those people trapped in that space-ship awaiting launch, screaming in panic and confusion desperately attempting to escape in the brief moments of lucidity they have every few hundred years. I was happier for it.

  • @williamcrowe2576
    @williamcrowe2576 6 років тому +2

    Interesting that you bring up Monty Python in relationship to the Hitchhiker's Guide book series. Two episodes of Flying Circus immediately sprung to my mind; carnivorous blamanges from Andromeda and Mr Neutron. Both were pokes at sci fi tropes.

    • @marconatrix
      @marconatrix 5 років тому

      Check out the old BBC production "A For Andromeda" ;-)

  • @HebaruSan
    @HebaruSan 6 років тому +4

    But... if the city wants to tear down your house to build a freeway, they have to go through an eminent domain process and pay you fair market value. So we are not as bad as the beings who destroy the Earth in this story.

    • @colinp2238
      @colinp2238 6 років тому +1

      I think later in the book it says that the demolition of the Earth was a mistake because the intergalactic bypass was to follow a different route but the Vogons fucked it up.

  • @sid2112
    @sid2112 5 років тому +2

    Just started the vid, if you get snarky with my Doug Adams, we are gonna fight!
    Edit: You did well!

  • @danzed5051
    @danzed5051 3 роки тому

    loved it i want more

  • @jba2048
    @jba2048 6 років тому

    Yay! Chuck is back!

  • @Quadr44t
    @Quadr44t Рік тому

    00:00 IN YOUR HEAD! IN YOUR HEAD! ZOMBIE ZOMBIE ZOMBIE IE IE IE OH OH OH OH OH OH
    Edit: well the first two chords anyway!

  • @GigaTrope
    @GigaTrope 6 років тому

    d-don't ask questions about why existence is a thing

  • @kaksikymmenta3
    @kaksikymmenta3 6 років тому +4

    There are 5 FIVE! Books

  • @colinp2238
    @colinp2238 6 років тому

    It isn't easy being a critic!

  • @Dragonangel426
    @Dragonangel426 Рік тому

    Wow. I've achieved normality, at least I'm not a bowl of petunias this time.

  • @moodydude6790
    @moodydude6790 5 років тому

    Is it me or would the 2005 Hitchiker film make a good Christmas review?

  • @rgaleny
    @rgaleny 5 років тому

    the meaning of life is absurdity. see Camus

  • @curtwolk2419
    @curtwolk2419 3 роки тому

    Moralizing innuendo 6×9=42

  • @suikatime
    @suikatime 5 років тому

    cou DEGRASS

  • @whiplashthunderhead4258
    @whiplashthunderhead4258 4 роки тому

    Feeling bad for doing so, but observing current # of comments being 42

  • @1v1thousand
    @1v1thousand 2 роки тому

    Spoilers in the first minutes

  • @gstone8255
    @gstone8255 6 років тому

    So It's Rick and Morty before Rick and Morty ?

  • @dragonskunkstudio7582
    @dragonskunkstudio7582 6 років тому

    What? Link to the website with a look at the show or movie, no?
    Maybe next time.

  • @ifandbut
    @ifandbut 6 років тому

    Man, the book just sounds depressing as hell.

    • @ZipplyZane
      @ZipplyZane 6 років тому

      It's not. And I'm pretty sensitive to that stuff. (I refuse to watch the more recent BSG because it is so depressing.)