The fact that Javier Bardem did not speak English well, was against violence and also at the beginning did not want to be in the film makes it so ironic to the point that it was literally being named the most realistic film depiction of a psychopath by an independent group of psychologists in the Journal of Forensic Sciences for his role as Anton Chigurh
The fact the movie protrays that at the end of the day he's only human. He talked about "knowing to a certainty" about how things will turn out and ends up getting into a car accident at the end of the film. He knows himself to be calculating and smart, but even he could not have predicted the accident.
I always thought Anton represented violent events committed by multiple people. Tying the acts to one person puts a spotlight on why people indulge in malicious intent executed by their own hands.
Depends, if you could question an undeniable crime....It's been 8months since you last viewed this video construct...Tell me, did you pick the one right tool?
@@KompadoodleLEL it either means "do you see me" like are you gonna tell anyone what happened or what he looks like. or it could be "do you see me" literally as in if he sees him he is dead, and he sees him.
@@KompadoodleLEL the accountant stated “ i see” then he asks if he’s going to shoot him. Anton replied “that depends, do you see me?” Meaning that if said yes he was going to die if he said no he wouldn’t kill him..
I watched the film recently and Carson infers to Llewelyn in the hospital that anyone who sees and identifies Anton has died. In my opinion Anton would kill this guy regardless of his answer.
Anton is a complex psychopath who lies to himself by saying he is an agent of fate to justify his crave for killing (it's why he uses the coin on the store clerk). In the last scenes where he kill's the wife, her rejection to play by his fate role extremely distraughted him, as she made him take responsibility for the killing, forcing him to acknowledge the lie and realizing that he does not kill because he is an agent of fate, but rather, he kill's only because it is his desire. The scene of the crash after directly continues this, showing that he too is a subject of fate.
I wouldn't say it was his desire to kill her....more like his desire to adhere to the principles he constructed for himself regardless of how horrible his actions were. She one upped him by adhering to principles of her own. The only goal in his mind was to finish the job which he did, but this time with maybe a hint of remorse. She put a huge dent in his core beliefs - which the car accident that follows that scene symbolically represents. A significant portion of his armor or façade was damaged, just like he was in the crash.
@@DavidTMSN I just saw another vid on here explaining that he represents death and moss is the hero. It’s based on a much older story of how a man is chosen to sit and play a game of chess with death. With one exception however, you lose you die. Thus implying that even if you don’t know what to win, you must play the odds and try anyways to take the upper hand. That is why Anton kills all who do not play, he is the reaper but still has morals to the rules of fate. The little canister and cow gun he Carries is in place of the reapers scythe. I love this movie because it shows that even tho moss was a hero and had good intentions, he could not cheat death. I hate movies that play out “hero hurts villain not bad enough to kill but enough to stop and because meh morals” nah Anton took his ass out OFFSCREEN
@@prophecy5886 Hannibal isn't walking around and always had a purpose, Anton was just death... worse part is he acted like he had nothing to do with it, like an outside force just moving you along.
Everything was perfect in the movie, the calmness and randomness of which Anton chills and the fact that there is no music to invoke any emotion. It’s just like death, death can happen at any moment and any time, just like that. It doesn’t matter if you’re a good person or not. It’s unfair, it’s nature. That’s what I got from the movie. Even the guy who think he’s exclude from the hands of death he too is a part of this world . He almost died at the end due to a random accident even though he was so calculated and precise.
I love the way he casually walks away from the car he just blew up to get everyone's attention in the store while he steals a bunch of drugs from the back to treat his wounds. It really felt like there was no emotion behind his actions. Like he was more of a force of nature than a man. Truly an amazing character.
@@fracturenumerique we can depict him as a Death himself, but he is very vulnerable in that book/film. I think it’s more honest to say that Anton is trying to be Death, but he is still suffers from accidents. Death is essential, he is not!
well he did say he will and he keep his promise actually who kill Carla Jean is not anton but his bf he let her die for just fucking money fucking money :(
Yeah,thats an accurate description of a psychopath. Except the movie didnt portray how most of the times they get their ass whooped by law enforcement or other thugs. Theyre only fearless because theyre too stupid to correctly assess their situation.
Anton is fascinating because it's like there's something occupying a human body that isn't a human soul. Whatever is driving him to act is a force of pure evil, not motivated by hatred or anger or any kind of human emotion, just sheer malevolence and wickedness. It's not his surface appearance or mannerisms or even his actions that are disturbing, it's whatever is underneath him that is motivating him to do these things.
Chigurh isn't the antagonist, Chigurh is merely the effect of a cause. attachment (desire/ignorance/dishonesty) is the real antagonist, and the cause of Chigurh. death by Chigurh is the end result of attachment. you can run, fight, or hide, but Chigurh shows that there is always an unstoppable force coming for your attachments. nothing lasts, no good man wins in this world. Chigurh is a reminder of impermanence.
All of Anton's interactions with his potential or confirmed victims are all worthy of their own individual scene analysis, they are masterclasses in acting.
Love the bit where he shoots at the crow. Never read the book, but it feels like in the movie Chigurh sees himself as an agent of fate. Crows are associated with bad omens often. So it's like he's saying "I'm already here, no need for you" Maybe, maybe not, but it's a great touch, better even that he misses and it flies away, unharmed.
@@Bob_99.1 Totally agree. He styles himself as something far grander than what he really is, which is just a very competent serial killer. It's honestly kind of brilliant in my view.
@@crazypantz3492I reccomend you read the book. It's literally the exact same as the movie but there are some dialogue that was cut. For example, Anton's speech to Carla about why he is the way that he is. It's a beautiful, elegant speech with complex sentences and poetic wording, and it's all just a cover up for the fact that he kills because he wants to. Because he's evil. Because he's a psychopath. No amount of eloquent speeches will change that. Its a phenomenal book.
Chigurh shooting the crow was always so interesting to me. It seemed to me like since he thought he was some kind of soldier of fate who needed to always be in control, he felt the need to eliminate what could be a symbol of his own demise. The crow did not in fact die, and fate did indeed catch up with him.
interesting, it looked like he missed but that's even more humiliating, for an agent of death failing to kill a crow is quite embarrassing. It shows us that Anton isn't some robotic terminator and will fail at one thing or another.
@@kenthefele113 So i didnt watch , does he kill them for reason ? like coin travelled to the gas station he said in one video ?so reason or he just does it ?
@@kubilayacar710 There's a plot reason for him being there ; the movie revolves around the protagonist stealing a huge sum of money on the scene of a drug deal that ended in a shootout. Anton is a hired gun sent to retrieve the money and chase the protagonist, so he's expected to kill some people, that's his job in a shady business. But the way he goes about it is devoid of emotion and he does kill more than necessary, using a logic that only he really understands. He seems to try and act like it's justified but it only makes sense in his own head, the viewer or characters never really get to understand him or talk him out of it (despite trying on several occasions), which is partly why he's so memorable ; since his reason for killing is never made clear or reasonable, he's never humanized throughout the movie, and just stays an absolute threat that's always chasing. He can be talked with, but he can never be talked out of anything. Dialogue never leads to any type of understanding with any of the other characters. He does spare some people, but not necessarily because they convinced him, he just happened to find a reason to spare them within his own twisted logic, and they're absolutely clueless about what just happened and what could have.
@@kubilayacar710 He's a through and through psychopath. The coin scene is an example of that, normal people don't go around forcing other people to play coin flips for their life. Anton Chigurh (Javier Bardem's character) is completely devoid of empathy, remorse, or shame.
It’s really trashy if you think about it. You lack the ability to do anything special so you result to foolishness and inability. Anybody who is aspired by these people aren’t abandoned they’re just too stupid to reach out to others to find meaning. True failures
I say Children of men too. Not cause it's similar in terms of story. But that movie has a real good depiction of violent conflicts like wars in countries that are at the brink of collapse. The street shootouts, random bombings, assassinations all feels like well thought out scenes like this one. Real good focus on realism while still being very dramatic. The only similarity is that the action scenes feel very realistic in both movies. Plots are way different be warned lol.
Anton embodies everything that makes humanity scary, specifically he is the human embodiment of action and preparation. Each and every thing he does is in effort to move to his next goal. No music, no talking, no outside distraction, I remember reading a fan theory that Anton is most likely ex military in some fashion. Due to his natural obsession with details and environment. The motel attack was a great example.
@@chickenspheres7582 Here is the literal definition for humanity, "humaneness; benevolence. - "he praised them for their standards of humanity, care, and dignity"' do these characteristics sound anything like anton?
I swear movies before 2010 were so amazing actually cinematic, had great themes, and actors were on point the world was so much simpler then I suppose.
Guys thank you again for so much support i really appreciate it. For the people asking for the name of the movie or song check out the description, I always put the information there. Edit : 2 mil now, you guys crazy af thank you all Edit : 3.5 mil now, is this just gonna keep going?? Really, thank you all so much.
You deserve it, really like how you controlled the audio and chose the perfect clips 3:15 the music says "I turn to ask the question" right as the accountant asked if he was going to kill him, that was perfect and the main character turned twords him wow
I remember seeing this edit for the first time, it was something incredible, the editor of this video did an exceptional job not to mention how incredible and good this movie is.
I don’t know what it is about this movie, but every scene perfectly fits the aesthetic of a smoggy small town suburb. The yellow daylighting, the houses with no lights on, the way all the characters speak in hushed, intimate tones, the old wallpapers. I realize it’s an old movie but still, it fits an aesthetic I find hard to put my finger on, but one I’ve never seen in any other movie.
I feel like Anton is meant to represent the indifference of chance, he's a force of nature in his eyes he's not necessarily good or evil he's just following a set of cold logic.
Yes, but no matter how much logic there is, it makes no sense for you to say that it is not something to be taken into account in determining whether something is good or bad. He uses very simple gadgets to kill people, he dresses in a very simple way that doesn't attract attention, in fact, the only thing that attracts attention is how calm his voice always is. The first thing that stands out in a Machiavellian person is a relaxed tone of voice but with emotional ups and downs and tension when explaining themselves, because they try to give a confident image of themselves, it is an obsession with themselves to seem immune to anything. All because they feel emotions in a way that we wouldn't understand (all at once). They seem human, but they lack empathy. We have no right to judge anyone by appearance, that's just my opinion.
I love how Anton leaves the story limping, in pain, dazed with both body and confidence shattered. That which he sought and exploited throughout the story, control, is taken from him in a second, and it absolutely terrifies him. That "force of nature" aura is stripped bare.
The irony was that the moment he defied the will of the coin by making his own choice to kill, circumstance put him into a car crash shortly afterward. The doctrine of his killings were shaken and so were his ties as an agent of fate.
0:39 that part no matter how many times I watch it...that will give me goosebumps and make me say to myself "Oh damn that guy was just unlucky too meet Anton at the same exact road"
It's so horrific. That shit gives me goddamn shudders. Guy does nothing wrong, and for his trouble he blindly walks into the abyss. It stirs my soul in a way I really don't like.
Anton sees himself as the personification of death: a grim reaper in the flesh. He gave the man in the suit who asked him if he was gonna shoot him a chance, because he acknowledged Anton's view of his own psyche, which is a tool of death. He gave Anton entertainment and acknowledgement with his question, and replied in turn with a question of his own.
Which mirrors what Carson told Moss. He said, shocked, "you've seen him and you're still alive?" when responding to Moss saying he'd seen Anton. Now, he turns to the unnamed man in the suit after the suited man asked if he was gonna shoot him and responds "depends, can you see me?"
Anton is a scary character because people like him truly exist in our world and people like him will show their true character/form to you when no one is looking around.
Every time this edit pops into my recommended, I watch it. I just love everything about it. The music, the clips, the movie itself. It's just all so good.
it's been 5 months, im still not over how amazing this is. I want to go back in time to when we studied this in film at school and show my teacher. You helped bring to life even more how amazing Chigurh is. Thank you.
@infuriated9167 phycopaths are very interesting and complex people, I'm not a professional but I have done some research on them There's afew reasons as to why someone is a phycopath One of the most obvious is they were born with it, the part of the brain that is responsible for emotional regulation and impulse control is underdeveloped However there's also lots of enviomental factors. Alot of phycopaths aren't blood hungry like their always portrayed, there's cases of phycopaths that have a normal life and even start familys. However if a born pycopath is for example abused as a child, then the negative envioment plus with their struggles of their undeveloped brains can lead to them being very violent, and possibly becoming serial killers. However sometimes phycopaths aren't born at all, they are created from either mental trauma or physical trauma By mental trauma I mean having severe trauma (usually trauma from childhood, like being abused by parents) that leads to them developing phycopathic elements like lack of empathy By physical trauma, I mean something like a blow to the head. Sometimes if you sustain damage to your head (especially as a child) it can damage the part of your brain that's responsible for emotions and thus leading to become a phycopath. They are very fascinating people and are sometimes misunderstood
It’s because he’s a living ghost. All the important parts that makes a human a human had been eroded away, presumably from trauma induced sociopathy or epigenetic psychopathy or both. It’s like watching a walking trauma response running on autopilot who’d been weaponised into a killing machine
What I always love about this character is that he's not just evil, he also bring evilness, corrupting everything around him, like with the two boys at the end who were nice to him at first and start battling each other when he give monney to one.
one of the best edits i've seen on youtube, the quality of the audio and image, being made in chronological order, and the details on cuts on the beat of the music makes it so unique
@Abrar is what your meant to believe except at the end of the movie the whole point is to show that while Anton is a very different individual, ultimately he is just a self absorbed asshole who kills for his own ego and he isn’t better than the rest of us
Yeah, I'm glad someone noticed. Also the scene before when he says "pick the one right tool" the song then goes " I turn to ask the question" and the accounting guy asks will he shoot him.
in the novel, this whole story, the fate of all these people, the whole mission of Chigurh finding the case and returning it was just to impress a potential employer that was never named. It was considered a credential or work experience for his next employment. So this whole encounter only represented a small part of Chigurh's life and experiences and for everyone else it basically either killed them or gave them an existential crisis. So he's hardcore and the people he works for are very much the same.
One of the best villains to grace the silver screen. Perfect acting and writing. Absolutely terrifying. Anton experiences no fear or hesitation, he just acts.
“Do you see me” is a chilling line. No matter what the man would have said he would have died since Anton turned around. Now the man had saw him and could tell the police. Anton was merely smiling at his own sick joke
This movie didn't sell me on the whole most believable psychopath on film. But until I saw Anton drink someone else's milk straight out of the bottle, I knew for sure this was the most realistic psychopath ever depicted on film.
My brother in christ, If we're stranded in the sahara and I have the choice to drink Milk or Water, I guarantee you to a fault: my goofy ass drinking that gallon of milk.
He didn't killed him......The accounting guy said,"Are you going to shoot me? he said,"That depends".....Did you see me?.....which tells that he didn't killed him...because if the accounting guys didn't see him he is not going to shoot him...the guy was already afraid...I think he said him that he didn't see him
@@hugglepuff1 But he only did it so the kid would keep quiet about Anton being there because he didn't have time to dispose of them. If he did have time, he would've killed those kids without a second thought. Thinking otherwise is madness.
The look back at the boys that caused the accident meant something. A thought back to Chigurs own childhood. The importance of not dwelling in the past for missing the present. Quality video
@@coolguyowl3341 that is true my friend. Chigur though would have been aware of the light jumper had he not momentarily been taken somewhere else when looking at those boys
@@Ellis_B Like I said, it 'partly' caused the accident, because he would've seen the car coming at him if he was looking on the road, but most of the blame is on the other driver.
@@coolguyowl3341 And that's why he had the accident, Anton is the embodiment of Chaos going against the rules, yet for checking the boys on his rear mirror and driving with a green light like any LAW abiding person would do, Chaos pulled one on Anton himself.
Even after watching the movie, Anton is still a difficult character to read/understand. It's really unstoppable no one stops him He has no friends, there are no allies It's him and his victims when they take away something that belongs to him. I even feel that Anton talks so many strange things to his victims before killing them because he is so lonely. Even a psychopathic hitman like him must need to talk while alone to avoid falling into absolute madness. Unless I have some contact, I think Anton died at the end of the movie. The bone was sticking out of that broken arm. If he didn't do something soon, logically he should have died. On the other hand, there are people who believe that Anton does not really exist. It is the old policeman's imagination of what this guy must be like. because we really don't even know anything about him It's like it's from another planet...
Film starts with words "My father was sheriff", so whole film is the sheriffs story. But he never saw Anton, only evidences. Chiken truck is the best example of "police version" of the story.
Anton is undeniably one of the most complex villains in the history of cinema. He is ruthless and the embodiment of evil. However, upon watching him you can't help but notice seems to transcend mere humanity and is more akin to a force of nature. He operates as an agent of destruction, seemingly devoid of personal motives. Instead, he carries out his killings out of obligation, as if he were a messenger of death. Anton's unwavering commitment to his mission leaves no room for moral ambiguity. In his world, people are either aiding him in achieving his goals or they become obstacles that must be eliminated. The world inhabited by Llewelyn is no country for old men, because no one is able to stop what is coming when pursued by someone as malevolent as Anton.
Disagree. Being simple as a log is what makes him unqiue, like a real sociopath. Even his "i'm a harbringer of fate" is called (and is in a nutshell) bullshit by Carla. He simply loves to kill, nothing more. His character lacks any depth and has barely any development. This doesn't make him a _bad_ character - actually, it what makes him so good.
@@optimus_antt antagonist of blood meridian, one of mccarthy's best works. if you like the story telling of no country for old men, you'd enjoy blood meridian. though its a 100x darker
I don't usually enjoy movie edits but Holy shit this is awesome. Maybe it's just cause I love No Country For Old Men, but the editing is top notch with relation to the length of the video.
anton is the perfect display of psychopathy, he is desolate of emotion, remorse, and kindness. he finds pleasure in the fear he finds in human beings before they die, if u ever notice in the film, if he ever smiles its usually around violence or he's about to commit something evil and atrocious. to me that shows a person who thrives in the pain of others and a psychopath usually gets his kicks through delving into the emotions of others, because they dont feel them much
@@makstex are you weird or something idk i dont get your answer, are u saying anton doesn't exist in the movie? or reality, in which case ik this im not crazy lol....but if u have some theory how he doesnt really exist in the movie id like to hear it cause it'd be a wild theory that a man that doesn't exist killed them folks
The fact that Javier Bardem did not speak English well, was against violence and also at the beginning did not want to be in the film makes it so ironic to the point that it was literally being named the most realistic film depiction of a psychopath by an independent group of psychologists in the Journal of Forensic Sciences for his role as Anton Chigurh
That's because a true sociopath thinks everything it kills has a good reason what I heard
@antonchigurh3567🤓
@Anton Chigurh 🤓
Maybe The reflection of his Dark repressed side
@@lagz_alot2452 thats a psychopath. A sociopath is a person who doesn't feel remorse from killing. Family or not
I love how being nice works almost everytime
As a nice and respectful person thats my technique no body even questions you
works everytime to what ?!?!
@jossmith8038 escaping Anton or the authorities?
@jossmith8038 thanks for explaining 🙏🏽
you catch more bees with honey than vinegar.
The fact the movie protrays that at the end of the day he's only human. He talked about "knowing to a certainty" about how things will turn out and ends up getting into a car accident at the end of the film. He knows himself to be calculating and smart, but even he could not have predicted the accident.
Of course he is just a human, an animal, much like the cattle he killed.
@Léon Rififi this ain’t an English essay chill out 💀
@@emmanuelnwani1272 it is literally two sentences
@@emmanuelnwani1272 it’s literally like 2 sentences what are you on about?😭😭
I always thought Anton represented violent events committed by multiple people. Tying the acts to one person puts a spotlight on why people indulge in malicious intent executed by their own hands.
No one acted evil more than Javier Bardem in the crime genres.
Depends, if you could question an undeniable crime....It's been 8months since you last viewed this video construct...Tell me, did you pick the one right tool?
WW in BB
Dawg never read into the US history 😂 our special forces are all neuro divergent asf.
@@Kawaiijihad what a weird comment
@@Kawaiijihad what a weird comment
That “do you see me?” line. Is absolutely soul shaking and perfection in acting.
i dont get it what does it mean?
@@KompadoodleLEL it either means "do you see me" like are you gonna tell anyone what happened or what he looks like. or it could be "do you see me" literally as in if he sees him he is dead, and he sees him.
@@KompadoodleLEL the accountant stated “ i see” then he asks if he’s going to shoot him.
Anton replied “that depends, do you see me?” Meaning that if said yes he was going to die if he said no he wouldn’t kill him..
@@knova7597 ooh, thanks thats chilling sheesh
I watched the film recently and Carson infers to Llewelyn in the hospital that anyone who sees and identifies Anton has died. In my opinion Anton would kill this guy regardless of his answer.
Anton is a complex psychopath who lies to himself by saying he is an agent of fate to justify his crave for killing (it's why he uses the coin on the store clerk). In the last scenes where he kill's the wife, her rejection to play by his fate role extremely distraughted him, as she made him take responsibility for the killing, forcing him to acknowledge the lie and realizing that he does not kill because he is an agent of fate, but rather, he kill's only because it is his desire. The scene of the crash after directly continues this, showing that he too is a subject of fate.
I wouldn't say it was his desire to kill her....more like his desire to adhere to the principles he constructed for himself regardless of how horrible his actions were.
She one upped him by adhering to principles of her own. The only goal in his mind was to finish the job which he did, but this time with maybe a hint of remorse.
She put a huge dent in his core beliefs - which the car accident that follows that scene symbolically represents. A significant portion of his armor or façade was damaged, just like he was in the crash.
source: trust me bro
@@trapstrar Never said it as an objective truth lol. It’s his interpretation of the character numbnut
@@DavidTMSN I just saw another vid on here explaining that he represents death and moss is the hero. It’s based on a much older story of how a man is chosen to sit and play a game of chess with death. With one exception however, you lose you die. Thus implying that even if you don’t know what to win, you must play the odds and try anyways to take the upper hand. That is why Anton kills all who do not play, he is the reaper but still has morals to the rules of fate. The little canister and cow gun he Carries is in place of the reapers scythe. I love this movie because it shows that even tho moss was a hero and had good intentions, he could not cheat death. I hate movies that play out “hero hurts villain not bad enough to kill but enough to stop and because meh morals” nah Anton took his ass out OFFSCREEN
Did he kill the wife?
literally one of the best movies ive ever seen. a psychopath that actually scares me
You telling me you weren't afraid of hannibal lector?
@@prophecy5886 in a more villain esk type of way.
but i find this interpretation to be more realistic and uncanny.
@@prophecy5886 Hannibal isn't walking around and always had a purpose, Anton was just death... worse part is he acted like he had nothing to do with it, like an outside force just moving you along.
What’s the name of the movie?
@@Z87.344 no country for old men
The fact that there wasn't any music in the whole film and the emotion of each scene was in the characters is what makes this a masterpiece.
Everything was perfect in the movie, the calmness and randomness of which Anton chills and the fact that there is no music to invoke any emotion. It’s just like death, death can happen at any moment and any time, just like that. It doesn’t matter if you’re a good person or not. It’s unfair, it’s nature. That’s what I got from the movie. Even the guy who think he’s exclude from the hands of death he too is a part of this world . He almost died at the end due to a random accident even though he was so calculated and precise.
There was music its just very subtle
I love the way he casually walks away from the car he just blew up to get everyone's attention in the store while he steals a bunch of drugs from the back to treat his wounds. It really felt like there was no emotion behind his actions. Like he was more of a force of nature than a man. Truly an amazing character.
Javier Bardem nailed this performance. His empty stare is terrifying.
hi
@@kenthefele113He really is an amazing actor
@@fracturenumerique we can depict him as a Death himself, but he is very vulnerable in that book/film. I think it’s more honest to say that Anton is trying to be Death, but he is still suffers from accidents. Death is essential, he is not!
Literally me (well not literally but deep down)
The fact that while watching this movie I never realized it didnt have music in it until the end credits, always amazes me
Name of the movie pls
@@パニッシャ i know im late but just in case you still want to know its called No country for old men
hi
there is no background music in real life so it makes it all the more scary
holy crap, didn't notice that. damn.
For those who don’t know, YES he did kill Carla Jean.
He checks his boots for blood when he leaves the house.
well he did say he will and he keep his promise actually who kill Carla Jean is not anton but his bf he let her die for just fucking money fucking money :(
He was a man of his word after all.
@@Tekaida yeah he was
hi
@@IMYours-S2 go away you harlot!!!
"You go to hell"
"Mhm... alright"
That gave me goosebumps
Yeah,thats an accurate description of a psychopath. Except the movie didnt portray how most of the times they get their ass whooped by law enforcement or other thugs. Theyre only fearless because theyre too stupid to correctly assess their situation.
Yo still watching the edit huh?@@teodor181
@@teodor181
Yeah you are right. By the way you should read the novel, its way more detailed
Chills!
im your one thousandth like
Bro just walks it off, i live for that
Crazy movie, psychotic actor 🔥
@Stanley Stove maybe hes a method actor
@Stanley Stove well we dont know that do we
@@xeisenberg psychotic? I just saw a comment saying he hated violence.
@stanleystove actor
"that depends, do you see me?"
me: nope. Matter of fact i am blind as hell, i ain't see nothing in here
Matter of fact I can't even see you sir
@@xeisenberg is the camera on?
@@lightman9935 i don't know i just got here
im blind in my left eye and im 43% blind in my right eye, matter of fact i cant even see you mam
@@xeisenberg miss*
Anton is fascinating because it's like there's something occupying a human body that isn't a human soul. Whatever is driving him to act is a force of pure evil, not motivated by hatred or anger or any kind of human emotion, just sheer malevolence and wickedness. It's not his surface appearance or mannerisms or even his actions that are disturbing, it's whatever is underneath him that is motivating him to do these things.
Chigurh isn't the antagonist, Chigurh is merely the effect of a cause. attachment (desire/ignorance/dishonesty) is the real antagonist, and the cause of Chigurh. death by Chigurh is the end result of attachment. you can run, fight, or hide, but Chigurh shows that there is always an unstoppable force coming for your attachments. nothing lasts, no good man wins in this world. Chigurh is a reminder of impermanence.
There's no anger or hatred in him he simply kills because he feels the need to. Like a machine that has no other objective.
I absolutely LOVE how you articulated that! Screw that imbecile who's trying to correct you. Some people never mentally graduated from the 6th grade.
Chigurh is just the imagination of a sheriff who does not want to investigate this case, and invents a certain "murderer" who cannot be caught.
Yeah it's called being a psychopath.
All of Anton's interactions with his potential or confirmed victims are all worthy of their own individual scene analysis, they are masterclasses in acting.
Love the bit where he shoots at the crow. Never read the book, but it feels like in the movie Chigurh sees himself as an agent of fate. Crows are associated with bad omens often. So it's like he's saying "I'm already here, no need for you"
Maybe, maybe not, but it's a great touch, better even that he misses and it flies away, unharmed.
great assessment, it's pretty accurate as well
That’s deep never thought of it that way
The fact that he misses the crow still shows Anton isn’t immune to the random chance of disaster, shown in the car crash at the end of the movie
@@Bob_99.1 Totally agree. He styles himself as something far grander than what he really is, which is just a very competent serial killer. It's honestly kind of brilliant in my view.
@@crazypantz3492I reccomend you read the book. It's literally the exact same as the movie but there are some dialogue that was cut. For example, Anton's speech to Carla about why he is the way that he is. It's a beautiful, elegant speech with complex sentences and poetic wording, and it's all just a cover up for the fact that he kills because he wants to. Because he's evil. Because he's a psychopath. No amount of eloquent speeches will change that.
Its a phenomenal book.
Chigurh shooting the crow was always so interesting to me. It seemed to me like since he thought he was some kind of soldier of fate who needed to always be in control, he felt the need to eliminate what could be a symbol of his own demise. The crow did not in fact die, and fate did indeed catch up with him.
He missed the crow and it didn’t die how tf u gonna assume that
@@StevePerez2900 it looked like the crow flew away
interesting, it looked like he missed but that's even more humiliating, for an agent of death failing to kill a crow is quite embarrassing. It shows us that Anton isn't some robotic terminator and will fail at one thing or another.
you are looking too deep, he was just playing around and shoot whatever thing was alive at the time
@@royalecrafts6252 no
“People always say the same thing”
Is the single most terrifying line in the film.
He killed so much to the point where it is called people. Wow
I love how he sounds annoyed too. He’s so inhuman he doesn’t understand why people would beg for their lives.
@@kenthefele113 So i didnt watch , does he kill them for reason ? like coin travelled to the gas station he said in one video ?so reason or he just does it ?
@@kubilayacar710 There's a plot reason for him being there ; the movie revolves around the protagonist stealing a huge sum of money on the scene of a drug deal that ended in a shootout. Anton is a hired gun sent to retrieve the money and chase the protagonist, so he's expected to kill some people, that's his job in a shady business. But the way he goes about it is devoid of emotion and he does kill more than necessary, using a logic that only he really understands. He seems to try and act like it's justified but it only makes sense in his own head, the viewer or characters never really get to understand him or talk him out of it (despite trying on several occasions), which is partly why he's so memorable ; since his reason for killing is never made clear or reasonable, he's never humanized throughout the movie, and just stays an absolute threat that's always chasing. He can be talked with, but he can never be talked out of anything. Dialogue never leads to any type of understanding with any of the other characters. He does spare some people, but not necessarily because they convinced him, he just happened to find a reason to spare them within his own twisted logic, and they're absolutely clueless about what just happened and what could have.
@@kubilayacar710 He's a through and through psychopath. The coin scene is an example of that, normal people don't go around forcing other people to play coin flips for their life. Anton Chigurh (Javier Bardem's character) is completely devoid of empathy, remorse, or shame.
The way Javier Bardem played this character is amazing. Anton Chigurh is not just the psychopath, but the death himself
Some people have called him death incarnate but he's more of a mediator for death. Honestly this man gives me the chills
Because you are addicted by the evil
It’s really trashy if you think about it. You lack the ability to do anything special so you result to foolishness and inability. Anybody who is aspired by these people aren’t abandoned they’re just too stupid to reach out to others to find meaning. True failures
@@Apocalypse-rz7Legit opposite form of a girls tagline of "daddy issues"
OP.
Very rarely do I see someone use Mediator in a correct fashion, let alone in a sentence in this day and age.
Spot on.
@@yeejay6396 thanks. It made more sense than saying messenger
just finished watching this movie. For 27 years of my life, I have not seen a movie similar to this. It is truly one of a kind.
If you enjoyed it, I suggest checking out the series Fargo, which the Cohen Brothers (the directors of this movie) are producers of.
It's one of few movies where the bad guy wins
@@PcGamerify you two brothers from the same mother? i mean the avatar bruh😭
I say Children of men too. Not cause it's similar in terms of story. But that movie has a real good depiction of violent conflicts like wars in countries that are at the brink of collapse. The street shootouts, random bombings, assassinations all feels like well thought out scenes like this one. Real good focus on realism while still being very dramatic.
The only similarity is that the action scenes feel very realistic in both movies. Plots are way different be warned lol.
what is the name ?
Anton embodies everything that makes humanity scary, specifically he is the human embodiment of action and preparation. Each and every thing he does is in effort to move to his next goal. No music, no talking, no outside distraction, I remember reading a fan theory that Anton is most likely ex military in some fashion. Due to his natural obsession with details and environment. The motel attack was a great example.
Anton embodies nothing of humanity, he's almost alien in that regard lol.
@@mikehunt6234 you need to look at people closer
@@chickenspheres7582 Here is the literal definition for humanity, "humaneness; benevolence. -
"he praised them for their standards of humanity, care, and dignity"'
do these characteristics sound anything like anton?
He could literally be autistic.
@@mikehunt6234 😢
One of the best actings ever.
I swear movies before 2010 were so amazing actually cinematic, had great themes, and actors were on point the world was so much simpler then I suppose.
That's because it was dude.
right such fewer gems.
i can only name a few like Brigsby Bear or Bladerunner 2049.
Boomer.
@@agreeable-youth dont have to be a boomer to realize that. all it takes watch some old movies and some new then compare
What you're trying to say but didnt, Cohen brothers are the greatest film makers in recent history.
The flash from Anton's "alright" to the blood flowing towards his boots, together with the change in pitch is marvellous.
Hope to see more soon.
Guys thank you again for so much support i really appreciate it. For the people asking for the name of the movie or song check out the description, I always put the information there.
Edit : 2 mil now, you guys crazy af thank you all
Edit : 3.5 mil now, is this just gonna keep going?? Really, thank you all so much.
you did an absolute job god damn it
gj
You deserve it, really like how you controlled the audio and chose the perfect clips 3:15 the music says "I turn to ask the question" right as the accountant asked if he was going to kill him, that was perfect and the main character turned twords him wow
i love it.
i’m wide awake at 5:30 in the morning watching this.
Editing software? I just wonder how these videos are made so good
I remember seeing this edit for the first time, it was something incredible, the editor of this video did an exceptional job not to mention how incredible and good this movie is.
I don’t know what it is about this movie, but every scene perfectly fits the aesthetic of a smoggy small town suburb. The yellow daylighting, the houses with no lights on, the way all the characters speak in hushed, intimate tones, the old wallpapers. I realize it’s an old movie but still, it fits an aesthetic I find hard to put my finger on, but one I’ve never seen in any other movie.
The summer of 1990.
@@Chinalakesnakeactually this came out in 2007. I always loved that the 2000s still had films that really tried like this.
Looks like las venturas from san andreas
@@justjoshua5759 2000s was just Diet-1990s.
@@Chinalakesnakethe comment above says it takes place in the 1980s and was made in the early 2000s so you’re kinda righ in between 😂
I feel like Anton is meant to represent the indifference of chance, he's a force of nature in his eyes he's not necessarily good or evil he's just following a set of cold logic.
Exactly , he doesn't seem evil . Like he doesn't necessarily enjoy killing or hurting people like the psychopaths we usually see .
@@abhaysreekanth he killed a random old man
Yes, but no matter how much logic there is, it makes no sense for you to say that it is not something to be taken into account in determining whether something is good or bad. He uses very simple gadgets to kill people, he dresses in a very simple way that doesn't attract attention, in fact, the only thing that attracts attention is how calm his voice always is. The first thing that stands out in a Machiavellian person is a relaxed tone of voice but with emotional ups and downs and tension when explaining themselves, because they try to give a confident image of themselves, it is an obsession with themselves to seem immune to anything. All because they feel emotions in a way that we wouldn't understand (all at once). They seem human, but they lack empathy. We have no right to judge anyone by appearance, that's just my opinion.
@@nazim9639 "cold logic". There, hope you get it.
@@nazim9639 He killed him for car,how i renember
"You stand to win everything call it." *instant goosebumps*
I love how Anton leaves the story limping, in pain, dazed with both body and confidence shattered. That which he sought and exploited throughout the story, control, is taken from him in a second, and it absolutely terrifies him. That "force of nature" aura is stripped bare.
4:20 : The ultimate irony. A man who dictates the fates of those in his way, has his own fate decided by two random boys. Top tier storytelling
He lets the coin dictate the fate what are you talking about
@@aryanlean and in that scene, it was up to the boys to be bribed for his $100. They could of said no, what would you have done?
@@kubglo7502 no different than a coin toss, a 50/50 what are you saying?
The irony was that the moment he defied the will of the coin by making his own choice to kill, circumstance put him into a car crash shortly afterward.
The doctrine of his killings were shaken and so were his ties as an agent of fate.
@@kubglo7502 no no no my friend you got it all wrong!
A big hug to the sky for Cormac McCarthy, writer of this masterpiece, who used his work to inspire the movie. Requiescat in pace.
What name is move please
@@Just_cuteS no country for old men
@@michaelbambino7975 what ??
@@Just_cuteSthe name of the film shown in this video is "no country for old men"
0:39 that part no matter how many times I watch it...that will give me goosebumps and make me say to myself "Oh damn that guy was just unlucky too meet Anton at the same exact road"
It's so horrific. That shit gives me goddamn shudders. Guy does nothing wrong, and for his trouble he blindly walks into the abyss. It stirs my soul in a way I really don't like.
@@TheEpicPancakei couldn't have said better myself, perfect.
@@TheEpicPancakeScout!
He is simply Michael Myers without a mask ....
Real
Anton sees himself as the personification of death: a grim reaper in the flesh.
He gave the man in the suit who asked him if he was gonna shoot him a chance, because he acknowledged Anton's view of his own psyche, which is a tool of death. He gave Anton entertainment and acknowledgement with his question, and replied in turn with a question of his own.
Hey what's the movie name
@@haideryt5855 ,,No country for old man".
Bro
Which mirrors what Carson told Moss. He said, shocked, "you've seen him and you're still alive?" when responding to Moss saying he'd seen Anton. Now, he turns to the unnamed man in the suit after the suited man asked if he was gonna shoot him and responds "depends, can you see me?"
Anton is a scary character because people like him truly exist in our world and people like him will show their true character/form to you when no one is looking around.
being alone with these people is fucking scary. you don't even feel a soul there, no emotions, just uncertainty.
Every time this edit pops into my recommended, I watch it. I just love everything about it. The music, the clips, the movie itself. It's just all so good.
One of the best antagonist and movies. These edits always go hard man.
it's been 5 months, im still not over how amazing this is. I want to go back in time to when we studied this in film at school and show my teacher. You helped bring to life even more how amazing Chigurh is. Thank you.
why the fuck would you study this at school
Well I suggest read novel too because its more detailed
This man evokes in me a feeling of anger, hatred, malice, but at the same time a feeling of some empathy
Ik. Makes you wonder why they are the way they are
And you have to say call it
Good.....let the hate flow through you
@infuriated9167 phycopaths are very interesting and complex people, I'm not a professional but I have done some research on them
There's afew reasons as to why someone is a phycopath
One of the most obvious is they were born with it, the part of the brain that is responsible for emotional regulation and impulse control is underdeveloped
However there's also lots of enviomental factors. Alot of phycopaths aren't blood hungry like their always portrayed, there's cases of phycopaths that have a normal life and even start familys.
However if a born pycopath is for example abused as a child, then the negative envioment plus with their struggles of their undeveloped brains can lead to them being very violent, and possibly becoming serial killers.
However sometimes phycopaths aren't born at all, they are created from either mental trauma or physical trauma
By mental trauma I mean having severe trauma (usually trauma from childhood, like being abused by parents) that leads to them developing phycopathic elements like lack of empathy
By physical trauma, I mean something like a blow to the head. Sometimes if you sustain damage to your head (especially as a child) it can damage the part of your brain that's responsible for emotions and thus leading to become a phycopath.
They are very fascinating people and are sometimes misunderstood
It’s because he’s a living ghost. All the important parts that makes a human a human had been eroded away, presumably from trauma induced sociopathy or epigenetic psychopathy or both. It’s like watching a walking trauma response running on autopilot who’d been weaponised into a killing machine
That "Yessir, I've got it under control." With the piano and him just closing in is so 🥶🌨️
incredible, this is one my favourite videos of all time. Every time I see it, it gets better. Thank you Xeisenberg
🎯
What I always love about this character is that he's not just evil, he also bring evilness, corrupting everything around him, like with the two boys at the end who were nice to him at first and start battling each other when he give monney to one.
inteeresting observation
one of the best edits i've seen on youtube, the quality of the audio and image, being made in chronological order, and the details on cuts on the beat of the music makes it so unique
We need more villains like Anton without some tragic backstory and just existing to cause chaos
Thats like 50% of villans. They just arent as terrifying as anton because anton is real.
@@alpha_9997 But Anton is not real xD
@@suslan22f can your brain not function? Of course anton himself isnt real but people like anton are real. Like the zodiac killer or ted bundy
That’s what a villain is.
@Abrar is what your meant to believe except at the end of the movie the whole point is to show that while Anton is a very different individual, ultimately he is just a self absorbed asshole who kills for his own ego and he isn’t better than the rest of us
This movie is one of the few that actually creeps me out, he played that role magnificently
'Do you see me?'
The song: You see me, I see you, how pleasant
Yeah, I'm glad someone noticed. Also the scene before when he says "pick the one right tool" the song then goes " I turn to ask the question" and the accounting guy asks will he shoot him.
Pls the time stamp
@@bananagoose2469 just watch the clip, but its 3:15
@@Volvoghini thanks
@@xeisenberg Props to you for lining the song up with the scenes, mad impressive
in the novel, this whole story, the fate of all these people, the whole mission of Chigurh finding the case and returning it was just to impress a potential employer that was never named. It was considered a credential or work experience for his next employment. So this whole encounter only represented a small part of Chigurh's life and experiences and for everyone else it basically either killed them or gave them an existential crisis. So he's hardcore and the people he works for are very much the same.
I’m honestly happy this wasn’t included. Even though he beat everyone, he still lost in the end.
Re-watching this edit for the 100th time. It's just beautiful ❤
fr
Has to be one of the best edits I’ve seen
Bardem did best of playing his role
perfect edit
perfect song
perfect movie
perfect everything
Name of the song please??
@@husseinalazkany6197 mr kitty after dark
Bro what is the name movie
movie name is "No Country for Old Men"
real
One of the best No country for old men edits ive seen
Edit: Watch my No Country for Old Men tributes if your interested.
It is the best
Truth
THE best
Incredible how the best person for the role, was someone who in real life is the complete opposite of the role he plays. He did an incredible job.
One of the best villains to grace the silver screen. Perfect acting and writing. Absolutely terrifying. Anton experiences no fear or hesitation, he just acts.
He’s so interesting, from his weird haircut to his weird name. Everything matches, he’s original and mysterious. It makes me wanna know more about him
His haircut is like this probably because he does it himself, I doubt he goes to a barber and has a little chat
Anton Chigurh isn't even attached to any nationality; his nationality is left completely ambigious by the Coen brothers and the author of the book.
Are you a woman, by any chance?
@@Mae_Renneburg isn't he supposed to be Mexican or from South America? 🤔
i dont wanna know more it would ruin the ambiguity
The book is incredible. The movie follows it really well actually.
@jesussebastiangarciagonzal621no country for old men
Good if true love when they actully follow the source meterial Hollywood tends to butcher the source meterial
“Do you see me” is a chilling line. No matter what the man would have said he would have died since Anton turned around. Now the man had saw him and could tell the police. Anton was merely smiling at his own sick joke
No Country for Old Men, I love that damn film...
This is my favorite edit by far. You did an amazing work!
Watching clips of this movie makes you feel like a survivor of it. I was on edge watching this
This edit is INSANE, the scenes changes in harmony with the songs beat.
Wow that was one of the greatest movies I have ever seen. Simply a masterpiece
This movie didn't sell me on the whole most believable psychopath on film.
But until I saw Anton drink someone else's milk straight out of the bottle, I knew for sure this was the most realistic psychopath ever depicted on film.
Cartoon villains drink alcohol. True, real life villains enjoy milk
Psychopath?
Sure.
But the milk?
It.... It is not even "psychotic", it indicates a lack of common sense, a lack of rules.
Lmao whats wrong with drinking milk?... its not harmful like alcohol
@@luchko3936
You drink your own milk.
My brother in christ, If we're stranded in the sahara and I have the choice to drink Milk or Water, I guarantee you to a fault: my goofy ass drinking that gallon of milk.
This edit is immaculate. You're phenomenal
Name of the movie pls?
.
@@パニッシャ No Country for Old Men
3:16 - "I turn to ask the question"
As the guy from accounting asks the last question of his life.
Fucking amazing video. 10/10
He didn't killed him......The accounting guy said,"Are you going to shoot me? he said,"That depends".....Did you see me?.....which tells that he didn't killed him...because if the accounting guys didn't see him he is not going to shoot him...the guy was already afraid...I think he said him that he didn't see him
This creation is spectacular. Thank you for the superb editing and the music choice is wicked perfect.
One of my favorite videos on the entire platform
Remember, you are always the bad guy in someones life and also the hero on someone elses.
This doesn't apply to Anton at all.
@@WhyTho525
He gave that kid a hundred bucks.
@@hugglepuff1
But he only did it so the kid would keep quiet about Anton being there because he didn't have time to dispose of them. If he did have time, he would've killed those kids without a second thought.
Thinking otherwise is madness.
@@WhyTho525 he may be psychotic but that doesn't mean a "thanks" ceases to exist for him
@@IamLunarosity
He didn't do it out of some goodness, it was pragmatism.
The look back at the boys that caused the accident meant something. A thought back to Chigurs own childhood. The importance of not dwelling in the past for missing the present. Quality video
It partly caused the accident, but not entirely, as the light for Anton was green.
@@coolguyowl3341 that is true my friend. Chigur though would have been aware of the light jumper had he not momentarily been taken somewhere else when looking at those boys
@@Ellis_B Like I said, it 'partly' caused the accident, because he would've seen the car coming at him if he was looking on the road, but most of the blame is on the other driver.
@@coolguyowl3341 Chigur can't be stopped
@@coolguyowl3341 And that's why he had the accident, Anton is the embodiment of Chaos going against the rules, yet for checking the boys on his rear mirror and driving with a green light like any LAW abiding person would do, Chaos pulled one on Anton himself.
For people want to watch this film the name is no country for old men
Amazing edit. This encapsulates his insanity quite well
he's not insane...
@@wickedgarden2037 he is quite literally insane, by literally all metrics. The entire point of the movie is highlighting his insanity
Even after watching the movie, Anton is still a difficult character to read/understand. It's really unstoppable no one stops him He has no friends, there are no allies It's him and his victims when they take away something that belongs to him. I even feel that Anton talks so many strange things to his victims before killing them because he is so lonely. Even a psychopathic hitman like him must need to talk while alone to avoid falling into absolute madness. Unless I have some contact, I think Anton died at the end of the movie. The bone was sticking out of that broken arm. If he didn't do something soon, logically he should have died. On the other hand, there are people who believe that Anton does not really exist. It is the old policeman's imagination of what this guy must be like. because we really don't even know anything about him It's like it's from another planet...
go home
You described it so well, i didnt think about that the policeman doesnt know what he looks like. interesting point
Film starts with words "My father was sheriff", so whole film is the sheriffs story. But he never saw Anton, only evidences. Chiken truck is the best example of "police version" of the story.
Psychopaths don't feel a need to socialise, actualy.
That's interesting. Sheriff Bell himself even says that Anton is a ghost in one of the scenes.
Really good edit bro, u perfectly explained the personality and psychosis of the main character in this movie, LOVE IT.
I can tell you that he got into the role of the character as much as it is enough for his personality as an actor
i have watched this on repeat religiously for the last few days
Movie name please
@@kombat8733 no country for old men :)
1:16 the emotionless on his face is the scariest part.
Javier Bardem is a legend doing villans
A movie about a drug deal did NOT need a villain this cold
the title, the edits, the music, the actor..... perfect.
one of the greatest movies ever made.
Very underated villain. Anton Chigurh is mad scary.
one of the unforgettable movies to exist
Anton is undeniably one of the most complex villains in the history of cinema. He is ruthless and the embodiment of evil. However, upon watching him you can't help but notice seems to transcend mere humanity and is more akin to a force of nature. He operates as an agent of destruction, seemingly devoid of personal motives. Instead, he carries out his killings out of obligation, as if he were a messenger of death. Anton's unwavering commitment to his mission leaves no room for moral ambiguity. In his world, people are either aiding him in achieving his goals or they become obstacles that must be eliminated. The world inhabited by Llewelyn is no country for old men, because no one is able to stop what is coming when pursued by someone as malevolent as Anton.
Disagree. Being simple as a log is what makes him unqiue, like a real sociopath. Even his "i'm a harbringer of fate" is called (and is in a nutshell) bullshit by Carla. He simply loves to kill, nothing more. His character lacks any depth and has barely any development. This doesn't make him a _bad_ character - actually, it what makes him so good.
just wait till you read about Judge Holden. He makes Chigurh look like he has the depth of a kiddy pool.
@@atonofbrickswho
@@optimus_antt antagonist of blood meridian, one of mccarthy's best works. if you like the story telling of no country for old men, you'd enjoy blood meridian. though its a 100x darker
Keep on coming back to this video, I just love this movie and the song goes so good with it. Good job man.
I see him as a representation of how vulnerable humans are. We are all just walking sacks of water and meat. Anyone can lose everything at any moment.
Yes
One of the best performances i've ever seen
I never comment. This is one of the greatest edits, with possibly one of the greatest characters in film history. Bravo.
Anton Chigurh is just pure evil, not having mercy on anyone
3:17 literally the most badass line "that depends... do you see me?"
Did he kill him afterwards ?
@@GARV17 no
@@GARV17 I like to think he didn’t, but it’s possible he did. It’s open to interpretation (in the film at least).
@Please you think that’s a badass villain line? Michael Myers has the best one which is “…”
@@Pleast how do you know? There's no way for any of us to know
this is one of the only movies that genuinely gave me anxiety.
9.5/10
I gotta give it a 10/10. Anton has got to be my favorite villain in fiction.
That smile at 0:23 gave me the chills
Its like his facial muscles are offended for his lips to contort into such an expression (based on a comment i saw somewhere else)
Very unsettling smile
I don't usually enjoy movie edits but Holy shit this is awesome. Maybe it's just cause I love No Country For Old Men, but the editing is top notch with relation to the length of the video.
0:02 i dont think he has it under control
Fr
He gd das just a hug
Quiet Dan never killed.
We need your edit of this song on Spotify. Nobody else has nailed the slowed version quite like you.
What’s name of this song?
2:25 I love this interaction. Moreover I love your edit, that transition is great.
anton is the perfect display of psychopathy, he is desolate of emotion, remorse, and kindness. he finds pleasure in the fear he finds in human beings before they die, if u ever notice in the film, if he ever smiles its usually around violence or he's about to commit something evil and atrocious. to me that shows a person who thrives in the pain of others and a psychopath usually gets his kicks through delving into the emotions of others, because they dont feel them much
Anton Chigurh doesn't exist. Watch the movie again. Live with it now.
@@makstex are you weird or something idk i dont get your answer, are u saying anton doesn't exist in the movie? or reality, in which case ik this im not crazy lol....but if u have some theory how he doesnt really exist in the movie id like to hear it cause it'd be a wild theory that a man that doesn't exist killed them folks
The entire movie is narrated based on the story. Now think about who stole everything and made up this wonderful story with Anton. @@bones272
I watch this video at least 3 times a week. It's so good.