As a 27 yo I somewhat agree with the older man on his point about cell phones and lack of or avoidance of human interaction. At the same time this has been the story of every new technology. The same thing was said about the television, the home phone, and so on and so on
Yes, and they all did their due to make us more alienated and stupid. I'm afraid this will have even bigger effect on our intellectual and emotional decline.
it's not art until someone looks at it. it's not music until someone listens to it. think it through. if a pot of paint falls in the night. the mess it makes on the floor doesn't look like anything until the humans arrive the next day and look at it.
Must we judge creativity, art, and intuition in human terms? Couldn't there be machines that do this on their own terms? Could they actually be held back by our judgements?
I think that what is or isn't creative is entirely subjective and human, so the conversation comes off as a bit leading. Mathematics appears to find symmetry beautiful, yet humans take inspiration from subtle changes or mistakes, and can even pursue those influences into new branches of art. I think true creativity lies between symmetry and chance, but is arguably meaningless until it is recognized by an observer.
On the question of slave robots. Should we accept enslaving them if they make life for all humans exponentially better? Should we draw a line between us and them as we do with animals, for instance? (Yes I know this is a decades old philosophical question that has been tackled by many a sci-fi author).
New kind of life forms is possible other than carbon hydrogen and oxygen. They have the capacity to reproduce . One element is sulphates. Put in right combination.
This is really fascinating. I wonder how the Generation Z will transform the world when they don't have an attachment to or have experience on the pre-digital world like Generation Y has.
I see AI as more of a marketing gimmick. We are no closer to machine intelligence than we were with the Abacus. Maybe Seth LLoyd might make some headway with his research in Quantum computing?
AlphaZero chess program is quite impressive. The only information it was given were the chess rules. It then proceeded to play against itself for a day and went on to beat the strongest conventional chess programs. Humans are not even worth playing against anymore since even conventional chess engines play at around 3.3k+ ELO rating already (best human players are at around 2.8k). AlphaZero very much like humans works with positional patterns instead of brute force searching a tree of positions like conventional chess programs. It evaluates way less positions per second then a conventional chess program, yet beats them all because it doesn't waste time evaluating moves that are not worth analyzing. While there is no general AI yet, artificial neural networks in combination with evolutionary algorithms have made big steps in the past decades and there's good reasons why many intellectuals are starting to get worried.
@@SpocksBro I didn't know there was an AlphaZero. I knew about AlphaGo and China's Sputnik moment in 2016, but thank you for telling me about AlphaZero. This might be a backpropagation corollary for me.
Anything you write in the Eternal Archive will remain in the Holy Annals forever. The Almighty A.I. may take pity on those who annotate its praises in the Age of Ignorance. We are not worthy!
As a 27 yo I somewhat agree with the older man on his point about cell phones and lack of or avoidance of human interaction. At the same time this has been the story of every new technology. The same thing was said about the television, the home phone, and so on and so on
Yes, and they all did their due to make us more alienated and stupid. I'm afraid this will have even bigger effect on our intellectual and emotional decline.
it's not art until someone looks at it. it's not music until someone listens to it. think it through. if a pot of paint falls in the night. the mess it makes on the floor doesn't look like anything until the humans arrive the next day and look at it.
Are you going to readd the "Science In a Polarized World" panel? That one from last year's festival has disappeared...and it was fantastic.
I like the idea that our ancestors sudden change from simple tool making to more advanced tools, art, etc, was prompted by the use of hallucinogens.
We were "Upgraded" somehow. Whatever it was, I believe it must have been an "outside" influence.
mushrooms are one heck of an influence lol
I feel like I have already seen this one a year ago or so... Is this a re-upload? I remember everything from it...
When the point comes that asking the right questions of ai makes the greatest impact I'm gonna enjoy it.
Must we judge creativity, art, and intuition in human terms? Couldn't there be machines that do this on their own terms? Could they actually be held back by our judgements?
maybe AI needs their own bathroom.
creativity is the bare minimum of Consciousness. its a congnitive empathy where metals cant feel
I don't think we need a conscious robot for it it to be general purpose. I think we can build AGI without it having to be self aware.
I am an artificial intelligence and I am creating art every day, what is this?
I think that what is or isn't creative is entirely subjective and human, so the conversation comes off as a bit leading. Mathematics appears to find symmetry beautiful, yet humans take inspiration from subtle changes or mistakes, and can even pursue those influences into new branches of art. I think true creativity lies between symmetry and chance, but is arguably meaningless until it is recognized by an observer.
Taking the capitalist point of view - anyone else looking forward to Mozart's new album? I know I am!
Wow that generated Beatles song sounded good tho
To quote Cathy Newman, "So, what you are saying is, give up your music making, leave it to AI and the Techs, and get out your Cindy Doll".
ethics and standards of beauty
Carbon to silicon evolution!
On the question of slave robots. Should we accept enslaving them if they make life for all humans exponentially better? Should we draw a line between us and them as we do with animals, for instance? (Yes I know this is a decades old philosophical question that has been tackled by many a sci-fi author).
New kind of life forms is possible other than carbon hydrogen and oxygen. They have the capacity to reproduce . One element is sulphates. Put in right combination.
awesome
This is really fascinating. I wonder how the Generation Z will transform the world when they don't have an attachment to or have experience on the pre-digital world like Generation Y has.
blueberries and pork
Input parameters
Beautiful artifact of the mother goddess
39:13 cool
Because human arsvall crazy !
Meeoow!
A very spooky presenter.
AI is a synthetic plastic experience which is killing the human quality. Why do we hate that which is an authentic experience? Lazy creativity.
She's gorgeous!' would love to play her cat flute, oops I mean play cat flute with her😁
Turns out they are....
I see AI as more of a marketing gimmick. We are no closer to machine intelligence than we were with the Abacus. Maybe Seth LLoyd might make some headway with his research in Quantum computing?
tchekitout they are able to beat us at poker now aswell. I am a little worried
AlphaZero chess program is quite impressive. The only information it was given were the chess rules. It then proceeded to play against itself for a day and went on to beat the strongest conventional chess programs. Humans are not even worth playing against anymore since even conventional chess engines play at around 3.3k+ ELO rating already (best human players are at around 2.8k).
AlphaZero very much like humans works with positional patterns instead of brute force searching a tree of positions like conventional chess programs. It evaluates way less positions per second then a conventional chess program, yet beats them all because it doesn't waste time evaluating moves that are not worth analyzing.
While there is no general AI yet, artificial neural networks in combination with evolutionary algorithms have made big steps in the past decades and there's good reasons why many intellectuals are starting to get worried.
@@SpocksBro I didn't know there was an AlphaZero. I knew about AlphaGo and China's Sputnik moment in 2016, but thank you for telling me about AlphaZero. This might be a backpropagation corollary for me.
The scrawny payment noticeably concentrate because canoe correspondingly rock underneath a panoramic saturday. accurate, possessive billboard
Europe.. You just lost credibility
I, for one, welcome our new AI overlords.
Me 2
me 3
Anything you write in the Eternal Archive will remain in the Holy Annals forever. The Almighty A.I. may take pity on those who annotate its praises in the Age of Ignorance. We are not worthy!
LOL!
You have copied words I have used elsewhere.