Bullet Brawls: Rensch vs Hess
Вставка
- Опубліковано 30 бер 2016
- IM Danny Rensch faces off against his ChessCenter colleague, GM Robert Hess, before taking on the rest of the Chess.com community.
Best / funniest UA-cam comment to this video gets a diamond membership prize.
Sign up for FREE online play: www.Chess.com
Follow us on Twitch: / chess
Like us on Facebook: / chess
Follow us on Twitter: / chesscom
Why does Robert Hesitate so much
Im sorry
I like trains.
Very fun banter along with impressive chess insight, so cool. I hope to see you two together again
Get Robert there every brawl, that dual commentary is so entertaining (and makes the show kinda more instructive :P). And keep your Veselin and Giri jokes up :)
- Topalov fan #3 -
Recommended... 4 years later
There should be a heckling rating as well as the chess rating. Rensch may be world champion.
"That hurt the two Veselin fans in the chat." What, the whole fan base is Veselin fans?
Rensch the populizer of chess keep the knowledge flowing cheers 😀
Nice commentary!
I was halfway through watching this video whilst feeling really pressured so I had to play bladder F2
Good match, guys.
Maybe if Danny hits Robert with a RENSCH he'll learn to play better cHESS.....
This banter is superb. Danny is passive aggressive and Robert defends well.
Hess may have won, but I'm forever your loyal Renschman, Danny
Whats the difference between xbox and chess.com; The prices for gold membership???
DannY going after black squares, white squares, all kinds of squares! Good win against Robert! #AustrianDenialDefense #OpeningPrep
re: quantum chess. In physics (of small things), you don’t know the state of the particle until you take a measurement. When two particles are entangled, you need to know about the whole system to have definitive information about any constituent of the system. (If I were to make my own chess analogy here, I’d say that this is like someone saying, “is a knight good on d3?” It depends on the whole board).
I think in their (fairly reaching) chess analogy, you have to try to capture a piece to take a measurement. So when Hawking tries to capture the king, he is actually taking a measurement of the king and the bishop, which for some reason means that he loses. The physical concept is pretty simple-knowledge of one particle gives knowledge of both, but the shaky analogy makes it more awkward than it has to be-especially if you know anything about chess (ie capturing a bishop generally doesn’t make you lose).
It’s funny/sad that this was an advertisement for something about Richard Feynman, who had a knack for creating illuminating metaphors. Here’s one:
“One way that's kind of a fun analogy to try to get some idea of what we're doing here to try to understand nature is to imagine that the gods are playing some great game like chess. Let's say a chess game. And you don't know the rules of the game, but you're allowed to look at the board from time to time, in a little corner, perhaps. And from these observations, you try to figure out what the rules are of the game, what [are] the rules of the pieces moving.
You might discover after a bit, for example, that when there's only one bishop around on the board, that the bishop maintains its color. Later on you might discover the law for the bishop is that it moves on a diagonal, which would explain the law that you understood before, that it maintains its color. And that would be analogous we discover one law and later find a deeper understanding of it.
Ah, then things can happen--everything's going good, you've got all the laws, it looks very good--and then all of a sudden some strange phenomenon occurs in some corner, so you begin to investigate that, to look for it. It's castling--something you didn't expect.
We're always, by the way, in a fundamental physics, always trying to investigate those things in which we don't understand the conclusions. We're not trying to all the time check our conclusions; after we've checked them enough, they're okay. The thing that doesn't fit is the thing that's most interesting--the part that doesn't go according to what you'd expect.
Also we can have revolutions in physics. After you've noticed that the bishops maintain their color and that they go along on the diagonals and so on, for such a long time, and everybody knows that that's true; then you suddenly discover one day in some chess game that the bishop doesn't maintain its color, it changes its color. Only later do you discover the new possibility that the bishop is captured and that a pawn went all the way down to the queen's end to produce a new bishop. That could happen, but you didn't know it.
And so it's very analogous to the way our laws are. They sometimes look positive, they keep on working, and all of a sudden, some little gimmick shows that they're wrong--and then we have to investigate the conditions under which this bishop changed color... happened... and so on... And gradually we learn the new rule that explains it more deeply.
Unlike the chess game, though... In the case of the chess game, the rules become more complicated as you go along, but in the physics when you discover new things, it becomes more simple. It appears on the whole to be more complicated, because we learn about a greater experience; that is, we learn about more particles and new things, and so the laws look complicated again. But if you realize that all of the time, what's kind of wonderful is that as we expand our experience into wilder and wilder regions of experience, every once in a while we have these integration in which everything is pulled together in a unification, which it turns out to be simpler than it looked before.”
Sorry-kind of long for a youtube/bullet brawl comment. Insert capslock Keanu Reeves joke here: WHATYOUDIDN”TLIKESWEETNOVEMBER??!!!11
Finding that line between flashy keanu bs and confusing boredom rockets is easier said than done.
Rensch- why was your pot laugh game so strong during bullet chess championships? . You seem much more normal now ! Love ya both !
Things got a little Hessy! Nice games Danny!
@@danielrensch If you responded to this comment three years in the future you're a god
Hess had more trouble picking a winner than Danny does finding checkmate. Diamond membership? Ooooo! I vant vun, I vant vun!
Haha, forgot about this (ok, not really, I've been checking three times a day haha). Thanks Danny! user: jrums14
Become a GM already, Danny. Why the delay?
LOL Who's rating is higher?
Danny you remind me of Dwight Schrute from the office
hey Danny what's more irritating to your eyes?...Hesses vampire shining skin or yooour poor chess skills??
"I forget things Robert."
I think you forgot how to play cHESS. :(
+Trevor Lambertson wp art
Don't tell me I'm worse. Lmao
I honestly think this Robert guy is so nice that he let Danny win a few games. Chess players are too nice.
What a couple
My god i just realised He is not Rudolf Hess, but Robert Hess xD When Danny started talking german it hit me... jesus i feel so stupid right now.
I have a variant called Vampire Chess.
give me that
BTW, why aren't the death matches on youtube. You could make people pay for those.
yo 26:56 Rh8+! Kxh8 Qh5 and Qh7 Mate next
black has Re8 before Rh8+
maybe Robbie would be able to beat danny if he trash talked as well as him.
and that Yale losing to duke comment stung
game starts at 3:10
John Wick was pretty bad ass. Although I have to admit the Matrix is his all time best.
danny looses in a good position and its his speciality
Veselin Topalov accepts the challenge! Nah, just kidding. He is busy playing chess with other former world champions. Nice show guys, but stay in your lane, and always look both sides before you cross a railroad track!
dialouge is too clean
i understand haha
Danny, you the top dog! You're the future GM takin Magnus to "Fork Town", Nakamura to "Crazy town" and Simon Williams to "Sack Town". Danny, I do want the Diamond membership, but more than that, I want to have a conversation about chess with you! I'd take a little bit of your personal time over a Diamond membership anyday! "Hashtag for-realsies". I'm relatively new to club chess locally and I have a ton of questions, and of all the people out there, YOU'RE THE GUY I'm looking to for answers! Whether or not I get to have a convo with you, I'll keep watching your videos and supporting you because I'm a true fan! and I support what you do. - May all your pawns be passed-pawns my friend!
Danny I still remember the days when you played d4 a lot with that veresov attack and things getting interesting but even now with the sicilian you are playing so well . Still wondering why you are not a GM ...
I played Robert in a chess simu
There is no Hess in chess. Oh, wait, scratch that. Never mind.
+David Franklin Could've done better with that joke. It had potential, but you didn't make the most of it.
In other words, you completely fucked up the joke.
LePredator1 To put it bluntly, yes. Even the basic 'you can't spell chess without Hess' would've been better.
gm hess insulting topalov???
Daniels is the best chess commentator
Danny, I know a lobster that got bitten by a Zika misquito who could beat you at bullet while stoned.
You need to say that the lobster's baby would beat him.
Here's one of the 2 fans of Veselin Topalov writing. He was once a world champion and you still play blitz on internet.. Cheers
Jeez, I guess Danny felt insecure about his abilities after being given the smackdown by Robert, and had to switch to crushing 1000 rated guys. Reminds me of when I watch the Jeremy Kyle show- at least some people have more problems than me! Chess.com username: Kevin_Gu
Here is the best comment : i like pizza!
+Robin Dhanpaul well, to bad for you! Daniel love to est them by the nose.
In the first game, the GM played lousy cHESS! :D (I know I'm going to win the monthly diamond membership, because I'm greek and we greeks are cool! :P )
firt5t😠😡😇😡😇😡😇😡