hey paradox you should make DLCs like the mods of ck2, with your lovely dlc policy it will be win-win. we get perfectly working mods like GoT, and you get more money..
@@BeBopScraBoo Damn... Let me make a video too then lol.. I recently got CK2 since it's free and my is blown that I didn't discover it earlier. This is perfectly, exactly right down my alley - just like all the medieval war strategy games I've always played, but better. I'm considering some DLCs but I'm definitely getting CK3 and I don't know how long it'll be until I revisit CK2.
@@croisaor2308 I love how Kings and Generals is doing this - especially since I'm a big fan of K&G and I've been utterly fascinated with CK lately. Definitely a good advertisement. It sort of reminds me of the Useful Charts channel - they make and sell big poster charts on all kinds of topics and make UA-cam videos based on the topic/chart.
Nah Odin are getting weak and frail. Instead of reforming the Germanic religion, reform the Romuva faith and have a massive Romuva invasion into the Holy Roman Empire. Cant have the Teutonic State if the German doesnt exist
@@samgopnik6638 They would have no chance against the Holy Roman Empire. HRE would wax and tax that ass all day and all night. Very origin of Teuton land grabbing(Northern Crusade) came about firstly as an opposition to the Pagan business of kidnapping and selling Christian slaves. Although it became corrupt, it did begin, and for a time carried on with proper intentions.
Me too, also appretiated the remark on how he was more of a mercenary of legendary skills rather than a zealous christian warrior wich is the image a lot of people still have
SombraD El Cid is an example that though a Christian he took no side who he fought but rather fight for equity and harmony even against his own Christian brethren to achieve justice and peace
@@TheSombraD2 I never read or understood him as a zealous christian warrior more like a knight who fight of true equility and justice and protect the innocent. Probably the version change arond the world
You gave William the Conqueror his nickname a little early. He earned that after defeating King Harold and seizing the English throne. Prior to this he was known as "William the Bastard".
Hes referred to as William the bastard until thr Norman conquest of England, if the conquest fails he stays William the bastard and if he wins he becomes the historic William the conquerer
@@notsamhoward many saxons even call him William the bastards for centuries especially in the North where a small scale genocide of the elites occured. If I'm not mistaken less than 5% of the english aristocracy survived the conquest.
And when you'll play ck3, England will become Norwegian, the Spanish kings will convert to Islam, the Roman empire will be restored and the pope will call a crusade against India.
Which is why the game is so great!!! If you wanted every event to play out as they did in history, you might as well go watch a documentary! I’m not sure, maybe you’re just making a joke, which is cool! But if you’re complaining, do you realise how stupid that complaint is???
Safey Smith I think it should be based on something that is plausible, not so far fetched you feel like you are looking at a joke. Like I can see England, having a mixed Norwegian culture if William fails and Harald wins. And Iberia falling completely to Islam would be hard to see happening. The whole Christian world wouldn’t because that means France would fall too, and the Pope would not let that happen. So the Crusade would be in Iberia and not in the Holy Land.
I am studying a bachelor in History at the moment, and I fear this game may annihilate my ability to concentrate on reading my history books and writing essays.
As a history teacher I have to say these past two videos have been great. Amazingly useful for showing how even in a single point in history multiple critical events and movements can be taking place all over the world.
I'm curious, would you ever use a video like this in class? I went through school before the rise of UA-cam History docs, and I'm wondering the extent to which it's affected schooling.
@@CatastrophicDisease Absolutely. Granted it would probably only be appropriate for an honors level class without significant scaffolding, but I use youtube docs all the time. I am a big fan of the Extra history ones because they do such a good job of bringing things down to a personal level
@@kairyumina6407 that’s funny you say honors level because I was honors level history and lit all four years of high school except for AP at the end. That was a few years ago but this type of thing I watch for fun.
@Tecumseh not to mention CA is incredibly lazy when it comes to being historically accurate. They try to get battles on point but fail due to their shitty engine but they try hard there i admit. But historical research and accuracy? not a chance. there isnt a single game they got it right on other than shogun 2. and thats stretching it.
Good thing Croatian king Tomislav defeated Hungarians in 925. And later Holy Roman Empire defeated them and they forever settled in the Pannonic basin. And in the second half of the 10th centhury they accepted Christianity.
KG: 1066 one of the most important dates in medieval Europe. Hungary: Meh KG: Stephen II. converted to Christianity Hungary: Sacrilege! On August 20th of all times?!
@tory porter wt* Vijayanagaras Madurai Sultanate Khiljis Carnatic British & Dutch did The only reason y Tamil survived bcoz of its position of being Southern most part of India How many Invasions Tamils faced compared to Punjab & Rajasthan??
Fatimid Egypt and European Christians: This pilgrimage arrangement is working well, let's keep this up. Seljuk Turks: Hey. Edit: Seeing more fighting in my comment's responses than at the Battle of Manzikert!
@UC9ZWNxzb5EXh8we2OQQnYww You talk like there is no war before tuks arrive. I think you say that because you are racist or just a idiot. I suggest you to read history with your brain.
@@bza6874 I call him racist because he said babaric tukic people and as long as there are humans there will be also war so it is meanless to call some race barbaric. İt is propganda aganinst turkey and you shouldn't say calm down.
Great video K&G, as always! It would be great to see such snapshots of history from other years as well. A small correction for Hungary: the first christian king of Hungary was St. Stephen I (the first), not the second, for obvious reasons, crowned in the year 1000. One of the national holidays of Hungary the upcoming August 20 celebrations commemorate this event. Stephen still had "pagan" name, Vajk. The conversion of Hungary to Christianity was a bloody affair leading to brutal civil wars but it ultimately contributed to the preservation of the kingdom, unlike other steppe-warrior conquerors that didn't make this move, like the Huns or Avars.
@@savioblanc The ethimology of word 'Hungary' is the Turkic On Oghur. It means ten tribes or ten arrows, it was a tribal alliance and Hungarians were part of this when they lived with the Khazars. The Byzantines started to call the Hungarians 'onogroui' or something like this and most of European languages adopted this word. The word 'hungarian' is a distorted form of 'onogur'. The word 'magyar' (hungarians' own name) came from the Proto-Ugric 'mons-' and the Turkic -er , meaning 'speaking people'.
Time Stamps 0:00 Intro 1:03 Rome 1:43 Franks / Holy Roman Empire 2:20 Poland 2:42 Hungary 3:03 France 3:49 Iberia 4:45 Anglo-Saxon Britain 5:25 Celtic British Isles 5:53 Scandinavia 6:15 Norwegian invasion of Britain 6:48 Normandy/ Norman Invasions of Britain 7:13 Norman Sicily 7:32 Kyivan Rus 8:26 Byzantine Empire 9:15 Slavic Orthodox Balkans / Bulgaria 9:47 North Africa 11:00 Egypt 11:38 Seljuk Turks 12:55 Persia 13:45 Sub-Saharan Africa Overview 13:58 West Africa 14:40 East Africa overview 14:49 Sudan Region 15:28 Ethiopia 16:06 India Overview 16:41 South India 17:00 Deccan Plateau India 17:17 North Western India 17:30 Outro
The Normans assimilated more than they ruled England. They tried to destroy Celtic cultures and Anglo-Saxon culture. They never loved Britain. The Normans are a society that even betrayed their own culture. This is what i am thinking about Normans.
@@Jordan-wk2yr False. Through mass intermarriages during six generations, the normans nobles were nothing more than french feudals with a very small amount of norse/dane ancestry (you may check William the conqueror ancestral lineage, he had indeed very few actual scandinavian ancestors) The commonfolk in Normandy had even less "viking" ancestry than their leaders. As for norman's culture in 1066, at this point in history, they had strictly nothing in common with danes or norses of the "vikings" age (language, religion, architecture, way of life, warfare, social organisation, everything in Normandy was radically different from Scandinavia but common with other french duchies/counties) Fun fact : Harold Godwinson was far more "viking" than William, through his danish mother (William's mother was simply a local commoner).
@@elbentos7803 not an historian but highly doubt youre right. Normans got to be after the paris siege in the year 885 (looked it up) , to assume they lost their culture and blood ties in less than 200 years... could be but i wouldn't bet at it
Historically that region inhabited by the Nubians and kushites were a power house in the ancient world (I'm talking cradle of civilization ancient). Pioneering in agricultural technology, warfare (they were renown for their archery). Many more things aswell
@Admire Kashiri Can't blame people on what they don't know. But yes the Nubian had the kushite empire which covered a lot of land. Some sources stating to Southend Spain but that's not fully agreed upon
@@darkzi1431 The 25th dynasty isn't unknown. You shouldn't listen to these "some sources" and I guess that by "not fully agreed upon" you mean "as agreed upon as Ancient Aliens".
@@Thulzor It's documented that they covered parts of east Africa and western Asia (Levant). But what is not 100% proven is the kushite rule in Spain. I say this because some say a town in Spain is named after the king Terhaqa of the 25th dynasty. But you can't know for sure
@@darkzi1431 "Some sources stating to Southend Spain but that's not fully agreed upon" Lmao no reliable scholar would believe that bullshit. The 25th dynasty covered Sudan, Egypt and parts of the Levant.
You guys are easily in my top three favorite channels and this series is among my favorite of your videos. I'm totally sold on CKIII and I'll definitely be ordering it through your link. I hope Paradox paid you guys well.
1066 really was the precipice of the modern world. Before it, Anglo Saxons still ruled England, half of Spain and Sicily were Muslim, the Romans were still one of the world’s great powers, and the Turks had not quite broken through. After, England became England, Spain slowly became Spain, the Latin west established superiority over the orthodox east leading to the rise of Western Europe, the Romans’ terminal decline finally began, the Turks became a world power. A really, really fascinating time. Confusing, but extremely rewarding, to learn about. Great video and thanks so much!
The Hungarian-Polish-Croatian rise is to me the most fascinating in this era. Because we are all bombarded by the English/French/German, and muslim history all the time via tv shows or youtube, but no one digs deep in the central, and easter europe. How the heck did the small Polish, and croatian tribes manage to withstand the onslaugh of everyone and even have a kingdom at that time...lol
@@vuksrb1480 well all tribes from the balkan peninsula fell quickly. But they had kingdoms before the norsemen, before the brits, or spanish, or even the french. I mean you had the Bulgarian Empire, the Serbian, and Croatian kingdoms 200-300years before England was even a thing. Ofc this kingdoms were small and week and they all soon fell to the Ottomans, and remaind under their rule for hundreds of years. But still they were there for some time
@@Ectheli0n you have right but the point of history is not a speed road of which one made the first kingdom, such as '' i had kingdom 30 years before you, i had kingdom 300 years before you, i had kingdom 150 before you, i had kingdom 1 year before you'' etc.. a kingdom, an empire, any political regimen is different and can be place anywhere in time. but there is a period that many specific regimens can be born. for example we have the periods of kingdomns, of empires, of tribal organizations, depending the people and the area. all the people and the nations where at some point of history, bigger or smaller, under someone else or independent or autonomous. the world history is more complex.
@@vuksrb1480 Croatia was autonomous kingdom through entire of its history. It always retain its own Croatian Parliament (Hrvatski Sabor), untill 1918. Search on internet for document known as "Pacta conventa", where Hungarian king granted all previous rights and privilegies to Croatian noblemen. And Pavao Šubić, in year 1300, was ban of Croatia and master of Bosna (ban Hrvatske i gospodar Bosne) with its own metall-coined money; he brought new dinasty of Anjou from Napoli (Naples, Napulj) to the Hungarian throne. Also, Croatian Parliament elected independently in january 1527 in Cetingrad Ferdinand von Habsburg as a new king (there is existing document with this decision) , opposite to Hungarians who elected Johannes de Zapolia (Ivan Zapolja) for king. Croatian Parliament and autonomy was untill the 1918. But, after king Aleksandar Karađorđević was killed in 1934, regent Pavle understood that he had to make an agreement with Croats (Sporazum Cvetković-Maček) in 1939 (banovina Hrvatska within Kingdom of Jugoslavija). And so, while all Srbija was under Turkish Osmanlic goverment (15th to 19th century), Croatia had its own Parliament and autonomous rights. Many castles from northern Croatia built by Croatian noblemen (as Trakošćan, Veliki Tabor and so on) wittnes about prosperity and culture. Croats and Polaks are only two Slavic people with renaissance and baroque literature (Marko Marulić Marulus, the father of Croatian literature /1450-1527/, epic "Judita"; Ivan Gundulić, epic "Osman" and so on ...) During that time, Srbia was only reduced to be a province (pashaluk, vilayet) of Turkish Empire ... and there was no European culture in Srbia untill the 19th century ...
@@vuksrb1480 It didn't fall easy, considering the fact that it fought them back several times earlier. It was basically inherited by the Hungarian king.
The english throne rightfully belongs not to that damn bastard but to Norway! We may have failed to take that damn island in the viking age but this time around it shall be ours!
@@pickle9974 ya still religions go against each other people dont understand that in old days conquest happened but now in modern times people cannot just go back to the countries where their ancestors came from.
I am no Hungarian expert, but the I am sure that the FIRST Hungarian king was called Stephen I, rather than Stephen II. It should be logical inasmuch as Stephen is a Christian name notwithstanding that the Hungarian language nowise roots from the Latin.
You are right, Stephen I. was our first truly Christian ruler, who declared the conversion of the country, upgrading his title to king from grand-prince. And yes, it's his Christian name, he was called Vajk originally. I think they meant to say first, but made a mistake. But it's great to see that we are mentioned in this video, and that others are interested in our history.
@@mertkekevi3515 He was 'Fejedelem' what cant be translated to English, hence he is called 'Grand Prince', but in reality this title was closer to a Khagan than to a Prince.
The medieval is interesting. Not just that it gives birth to many fantasy tales but also unique Kingdoms at the time. Some retained their original name to this day and some doesn't.
I wish there'll be 732 AD start date " Battle of tours " it's a turning point in both European and Islamic history or even back to 717 AD " siege of Constantinople"
They did mention the steppes. There just wasn't much to talk about, since the Cuman effectively dominated it, and were the cause of all the conflict between the pechenegs (who were also mentioned) and the Romans, and the other steppe peoples getting pushed out.
@@Leivve What about the Volga Bulgarians? They had recently accepted Islam and were a dominant force in the region. Things could be said about the Finno-Ugric tribes and the rest of the Altaic people.
@@BlackWolf9988 no there is not I would not want to plat child emperors all time I guees japan would nice but is Crusader kings so it is about mainly middle east and Europe.
Good Mardook!, I love these Global year over views. It's tying together dozens of the other deep dive videos. I've learned more about history in the last 5 months than in the previous 10 years thanks to channels like K&J, Invictus and a few others.
We're used to it, god forbid anyone mentioned us in anything even if we were relevant. I have read books and seen documentaries of the Ottoman incursions into Europe that mentioned even Poland more than us!
@@wildfire9280 Yupp, they have written two about Serbia but then again, Croatia is constantly ignored so I would be surprised if they even knew what "a Croatia" even is
You broke my heart by not even slightly mentioning georgia, which would have its golden age in several decades and being one of the prominent powers in the region 💔
@Kings and Generals only way to repent is to make in depth review of battle of Didgori and king david the builder 😂😂❤️ P. S. I dont think that there are many battles in hostory where 55000 man strong army completely routs army of 250 000 man
Unusual to see the County of Portucale - from which Portugal was born - displayed as part of the Kingdom of Galicia. In fact, that's correct, but we are so used to associate the County under the Kingdom of León that this seems (almost) odd.
3:46 racially motivated? I'm no history expert, but weren't the persecutions of Jewish people religiously motivated? I thought racial antisemitism only became a thing around the 19th century, but now I am curious, what traces are there of racially motivated antisemitism in 1066?
I assume "racially motivated" in this case is supposed to mean "because they were seen as foreigners". Not strictly "race"-based like since the 19th century but with more than just religious motivations.
I think it meant that it was meant more towards ethnic based violence as ethnic Jews are in the same race as other ethnic European/Middle Eastern groups.
Really awesome of you guys to mention African states below the Sahara. It paints a much clearer picture of the old world in 1066. Way better then having an awkward blank spot under North Africa.
Brilliant video! I would be very interested if K&G continued to make content like this, of interesting dates and what was going on around the world at that time. It would help put a lot of events into better perspective!
I'm never one to subscribe, like or comment but I did so this time because of how much I liked the video. I'm an eu4 fan but that's not what brings me here. I've enjoyed your content for years but this type of format is the best I've seen so far. Keep it up!
Jazakallah keir man you really are a great person for taking an interest into this. Especially since a lot of Muslims have either forgotten or ignored their history.
İf Seljuks didn't save Abbasids the sunni İslamic world would became murtad shia/rafidah May God accept our grandfather Sultan Alparslan in his paradise insaAllah.
Basil II was truly one of the best rulers ever. Hoping he’ll get an episode soon ❤️ Cant wait to prevent the Manzikert debacle as Michael VII Doukas! 😁
2:54 - I think you meant Stephen I, because he embraced Chatolicism, Stephen II was ruling from 1116-1131. Nevertheless it was a great video, I learnt much about my favorite subject, History! It was just bothering me... :)
I pick early dates for achievements mainly like in CK2 some achievements have set start dates or 867 for example has an independent Zoroastrian ruler who is not a horde.
@@filipz8831 EU4 has other issues that make 1444 the start to choose, The later start dates aren't in a particularly good state given that they haven't been maintained and updated with all the DLC releases and that's before you get into how busted the game gets when you switch between dates before you've even started the game.
FilipZ A lot of People play 1066 this isn’t EU4 where the other starts are broken and never updated 1066 is the OG Ck2 Start And alongside 769 and 867 the most popular start in Ck2.
I pressed the like button, but as soon as I saw the length of the video I thought it was too short for this huge topic. I believe this could have been a 2-part video. Not saying the video was bad, quite the contrary!
I dunno why, playing him in ck2 was annoying for me. Everytime i was ready to holy war Rum there would always be a disease outbreak in constantinople so i cant personally lead them
@@danendraaryadewa5455 The solution is to never be in Constantinople, always lead the army. That is the only way one may play Alexios I Komnenos. ...Unless that doesn't work either :P
Again a very good video. In 1066 the most important event was the conquer of England by Franks in battle of Hastings which you have already presented. Since anglosaxons were in moral collapse, they easily accepted catholic faith of franks which determined their history thereafter.
Alternate History: Instead of Crossing the Rubicon in 49 BCE, Caesar is transported to 1066 AD With all of his Gallic Legions. The question isn't about what will Caesar Do. The question is, whether Europe will survive or Not.
yeah? well, buddy, the byzantines existed during that era, and where pretty much the only orthodox-christian power at that time that could compete against the pope attempting to convert the bulgar kingdom to christianity (the western one).
@@digitalshadow7968 The Frankish empire existed too at that time and were one of the biggest by they didn't converted England for example, did they? Everything is more complicated with politics even back then.
@@hristorusanov23 no, I didn't mean that the Byzantine were the only Christian power back then. I of course knew of the Frankish kingdoms and their legacy. My point was that it was the Byzantine v pope primarily in the east trying to convert Bulgaria into their own branches of Christianity. One being the orthodox sect of Christianity, and the other being the Catholics. Though I do admit that I didn't know that the bulgar kingdom first converted to Catholics Christianity before becoming orthodox, so I admit my mistake on that one.
Get some more information about Crusader Kings 3: play.crusaderkings.com/KingsandGenerals
I was dying 4 an ottoman video but this is good too
@@alinur5568 looks like im not the first this time :/
Thanks I downloaded the game. Loved it have to give you credit. Can you please make a video on the Battle of Palkhed . Thanks!
@@invalidnoun4746 my bad
Hi Kings and Generals can you please make video on chola empire.
Thanks for being INCREDIBLE partners in this collaboration. We hope to work with you for years to come!
Same here, love working with you!
Paradox Interactive Victoria 3 video series confirmed.
@@theuselessmember Yes!
hey paradox you should make DLCs like the mods of ck2, with your lovely dlc policy it will be win-win. we get perfectly working mods like GoT, and you get more money..
and i want attila’s era.
Paradox could not have paid enough for this! Best advertisment ive
ever seen! Really makes me intrested in playing the game.
probly got a free key and 50% off dlc for life
@@BeBopScraBoo Damn... Let me make a video too then lol.. I recently got CK2 since it's free and my is blown that I didn't discover it earlier. This is perfectly, exactly right down my alley - just like all the medieval war strategy games I've always played, but better. I'm considering some DLCs but I'm definitely getting CK3 and I don't know how long it'll be until I revisit CK2.
Actually an amazing preface for the game.
@@croisaor2308 I love how Kings and Generals is doing this - especially since I'm a big fan of K&G and I've been utterly fascinated with CK lately. Definitely a good advertisement. It sort of reminds me of the Useful Charts channel - they make and sell big poster charts on all kinds of topics and make UA-cam videos based on the topic/chart.
And you'll only pay $300.00 before they are done DLCing it.
Fun fact: Harald Bluetooth of Denmark seized the throne by assassinating his father Gorm Headphonejack
this is one of the best "so bad it is funny" jokes i have seen
Impale this man, Right here medieval officer
You must be pun-ished
@Giorno Denmarks immigrants aren't even from the countries that end in stan
It's funny
"The era of the fearless Vikings was at its twilight."
**selects Erik the Heathen, gets ready for Germanic reformation**
Me: *Oh, I don't think so.*
Nah Odin are getting weak and frail. Instead of reforming the Germanic religion, reform the Romuva faith and have a massive Romuva invasion into the Holy Roman Empire.
Cant have the Teutonic State if the German doesnt exist
Oh boi here ı blotting my way to Germanic reformation again.
@@samgopnik6638 They would have no chance against the Holy Roman Empire. HRE would wax and tax that ass all day and all night. Very origin of Teuton land grabbing(Northern Crusade) came about firstly as an opposition to the Pagan business of kidnapping and selling Christian slaves. Although it became corrupt, it did begin, and for a time carried on with proper intentions.
Virgin Viking gods who order people to fight to get into heaven vs Chad Jesus that wants you to love everyone and conquer Jerusalem
@@Szpareq See, fighting can be righteous
I loved the mention of El Cid! Awesome video!
Look at that martial skill: prntscr.com/u2ervs
El cid was my favorite character to play the Spanish nation of Age of Empire and I can tell that I look like him maybe a descendant of him ⚔️ ✊ 🧔🏻
Me too, also appretiated the remark on how he was more of a mercenary of legendary skills rather than a zealous christian warrior wich is the image a lot of people still have
SombraD El Cid is an example that though a Christian he took no side who he fought but rather fight for equity and harmony even against his own Christian brethren to achieve justice and peace
@@TheSombraD2 I never read or understood him as a zealous christian warrior more like a knight who fight of true equility and justice and protect the innocent. Probably the version change arond the world
You gave William the Conqueror his nickname a little early. He earned that after defeating King Harold and seizing the English throne. Prior to this he was known as "William the Bastard".
You cant call someone a bastard like that there or they just dont want to say word
Are we going to ignore the fact that he “bullied “ his wife into marring him.
@@flowermagnolia4551 I didn't know that. It is consistent with his reported personality.
Hes referred to as William the bastard until thr Norman conquest of England, if the conquest fails he stays William the bastard and if he wins he becomes the historic William the conquerer
@@notsamhoward many saxons even call him William the bastards for centuries especially in the North where a small scale genocide of the elites occured. If I'm not mistaken less than 5% of the english aristocracy survived the conquest.
"More historical accuracy"
So I can sleep with MORE of my family members?!?!
All of them
marry_anyone
as rick said : Just you and me morty , and sometimes your sister, and sometimes your mom, but NEVER your dad
*Hapsburgs Intensifies!!*
And when you'll play ck3, England will become Norwegian, the Spanish kings will convert to Islam, the Roman empire will be restored and the pope will call a crusade against India.
No fun in playing historical accurate game playthrough
So the usual then
Which is why the game is so great!!!
If you wanted every event to play out as they did in history, you might as well go watch a documentary!
I’m not sure, maybe you’re just making a joke, which is cool! But if you’re complaining, do you realise how stupid that complaint is???
Safey Smith I think it should be based on something that is plausible, not so far fetched you feel like you are looking at a joke. Like I can see England, having a mixed Norwegian culture if William fails and Harald wins. And Iberia falling completely to Islam would be hard to see happening. The whole Christian world wouldn’t because that means France would fall too, and the Pope would not let that happen. So the Crusade would be in Iberia and not in the Holy Land.
@@whiteipod2000 this is CK, anything that you thought won't be possible, will happen in the game.
Why didn't you mention the gaint crayfish on the map. I thought it would be a Major talking point influencing politics and trade
Imagine a monastery in 1066 actually having a map that accurate.
Then it becomes outdated in a few months
@@Spaceboyy95 *weeks
@@Jellygamer0 Days
@@zuhairtaimoor7779 hours
@@dingo1547 minutes
I am studying a bachelor in History at the moment, and I fear this game may annihilate my ability to concentrate on reading my history books and writing essays.
The game teaches you more history in a day than a semester of classes
Ankur Gaikwad it may teach you more facts, but that's not what history is about
Same for me
I have a project due to tomorrow and K&G vids are really making it hard to make progress
@@danshakuimo Enjoy working the entire night on it haha. I can relate
As a history teacher I have to say these past two videos have been great. Amazingly useful for showing how even in a single point in history multiple critical events and movements can be taking place all over the world.
I'm curious, would you ever use a video like this in class? I went through school before the rise of UA-cam History docs, and I'm wondering the extent to which it's affected schooling.
@@CatastrophicDisease Absolutely. Granted it would probably only be appropriate for an honors level class without significant scaffolding, but I use youtube docs all the time. I am a big fan of the Extra history ones because they do such a good job of bringing things down to a personal level
@@kairyumina6407 that’s funny you say honors level because I was honors level history and lit all four years of high school except for AP at the end. That was a few years ago but this type of thing I watch for fun.
I'd love to see a Total War: Medieval III with this much detail.
I’d probably buy a brand new computer if that got announced.
1212 ad mod for total war attila. it's what you're looking for with a working grand campaign and a ton of factions.
I don't think Total War could pull it off. Crusader Kings doesn't have the real time battles to worry about.
@Tecumseh Money and time. They can't make hundreds of playable factions.
@Tecumseh not to mention CA is incredibly lazy when it comes to being historically accurate. They try to get battles on point but fail due to their shitty engine but they try hard there i admit. But historical research and accuracy? not a chance. there isnt a single game they got it right on other than shogun 2. and thats stretching it.
It was St. Stephen I. and his father Prince Géza who converted to christianity in Hungary.
Good thing Croatian king Tomislav defeated Hungarians in 925. And later Holy Roman Empire defeated them and they forever settled in the Pannonic basin. And in the second half of the 10th centhury they accepted Christianity.
@@HunPride that's exactly what a salty hungarian would say 😂.
@@dontsearchdocumentingreali9621 What battle was this?
KG: 1066 one of the most important dates in medieval Europe.
Hungary: Meh
KG: Stephen II. converted to Christianity
Hungary: Sacrilege! On August 20th of all times?!
@@dontsearchdocumentingreali9621 Whitch battles are you referring to exactly?
"No one conquers the Tamil Kings"
Some unknown historian
@tory porter wt*
Vijayanagaras
Madurai Sultanate
Khiljis
Carnatic
British & Dutch did
The only reason y Tamil survived bcoz of its position of being Southern most part of India
How many Invasions Tamils faced compared to Punjab & Rajasthan??
@@EroticOnion23 no Mughals didn't conquer southern India
It didn't pass Central India
Keshava Medari you saying Mughals didn't pass central india? They were bordering Mysore at some point that pretty central India to me
@@kiber162 mysore isn't central india bruh
Hacker No.69 I didn't mean Mysore is in central India I meant if you border Mysore you pretty much have passed central india
Fatimid Egypt and European Christians: This pilgrimage arrangement is working well, let's keep this up.
Seljuk Turks: Hey.
Edit: Seeing more fighting in my comment's responses than at the Battle of Manzikert!
Missed opportunity to have the Seljuks go "Allow me to introduce myself"
@UC9ZWNxzb5EXh8we2OQQnYww You talk like there is no war before tuks arrive. I think you say that because you are racist or just a idiot. I suggest you to read history with your brain.
@@Al-tan Woah, I suggest you calm down... Turks did multiply the wars x100 though
It’s A Bird
It’s A Plane
It’s The Seljuk Turks 👿
@@bza6874 I call him racist because he said babaric tukic people and as long as there are humans there will be also war so it is meanless to call some race barbaric. İt is propganda aganinst turkey and you shouldn't say calm down.
Great video K&G, as always! It would be great to see such snapshots of history from other years as well. A small correction for Hungary: the first christian king of Hungary was St. Stephen I (the first), not the second, for obvious reasons, crowned in the year 1000. One of the national holidays of Hungary the upcoming August 20 celebrations commemorate this event. Stephen still had "pagan" name, Vajk. The conversion of Hungary to Christianity was a bloody affair leading to brutal civil wars but it ultimately contributed to the preservation of the kingdom, unlike other steppe-warrior conquerors that didn't make this move, like the Huns or Avars.
@@savioblanc too intimidate others, they just said "hey, you know those really scary invaders, yeah thats totally us guys.
@@savioblanc Magyars are descendants of the Huns.
@@savioblanc And in the dual honfoglalás theory the Magyars got their foreign name from their (I think) brothers or very close relatives, the Onogurs.
@@savioblanc The ethimology of word 'Hungary' is the Turkic On Oghur. It means ten tribes or ten arrows, it was a tribal alliance and Hungarians were part of this when they lived with the Khazars. The Byzantines started to call the Hungarians 'onogroui' or something like this and most of European languages adopted this word. The word 'hungarian' is a distorted form of 'onogur'.
The word 'magyar' (hungarians' own name) came from the Proto-Ugric 'mons-' and the Turkic -er , meaning 'speaking people'.
@@marcellgabriel1424 no,and the name isnt 'Hunnic' either.
Time Stamps
0:00 Intro
1:03 Rome
1:43 Franks / Holy Roman Empire
2:20 Poland
2:42 Hungary
3:03 France
3:49 Iberia
4:45 Anglo-Saxon Britain
5:25 Celtic British Isles
5:53 Scandinavia
6:15 Norwegian invasion of Britain
6:48 Normandy/ Norman Invasions of Britain
7:13 Norman Sicily
7:32 Kyivan Rus
8:26 Byzantine Empire
9:15 Slavic Orthodox Balkans / Bulgaria
9:47 North Africa
11:00 Egypt
11:38 Seljuk Turks
12:55 Persia
13:45 Sub-Saharan Africa Overview
13:58 West Africa
14:40 East Africa overview
14:49 Sudan Region
15:28 Ethiopia
16:06 India Overview
16:41 South India
17:00 Deccan Plateau India
17:17 North Western India
17:30 Outro
10:53 When that familiar background tune kicked in.
God, I can't wait for this game.
Last time I was this early, the Normans didn’t rule England yet
@@appleslover normands where vikings settled in france, they werent french
The Normans assimilated more than they ruled England. They tried to destroy Celtic cultures and Anglo-Saxon culture. They never loved Britain. The Normans are a society that even betrayed their own culture. This is what i am thinking about Normans.
hadn't ruled England yet*
@@Jordan-wk2yr
False.
Through mass intermarriages during six generations, the normans nobles were nothing more than french feudals with a very small amount of norse/dane ancestry (you may check William the conqueror ancestral lineage, he had indeed very few actual scandinavian ancestors)
The commonfolk in Normandy had even less "viking" ancestry than their leaders.
As for norman's culture in 1066, at this point in history, they had strictly nothing in common with danes or norses of the "vikings" age (language, religion, architecture, way of life, warfare, social organisation, everything in Normandy was radically different from Scandinavia but common with other french duchies/counties)
Fun fact : Harold Godwinson was far more "viking" than William, through his danish mother (William's mother was simply a local commoner).
@@elbentos7803 not an historian but highly doubt youre right. Normans got to be after the paris siege in the year 885 (looked it up) , to assume they lost their culture and blood ties in less than 200 years... could be but i wouldn't bet at it
All these dates, but still no release date for Vicky III
Didn't you learn anything from Total War Rome II? You do not renew a perfect game.
@@Roy-em2my exactly Roy, Vic II is just like a few mods away for being a perfect game for the genre, very hard to justify another game
@@Leonardo-ik9fx You are truely good man. Want to add me on steam?
Unpopular opinion. I hope they make eu5 first before vicky 3.
We need a game set during your reign.
History: Dongola is a land of rich of splendor
CK2: Dongola barely feudal and 1 tech each
EU4: 6 Dev trash province
Historically that region inhabited by the Nubians and kushites were a power house in the ancient world (I'm talking cradle of civilization ancient). Pioneering in agricultural technology, warfare (they were renown for their archery). Many more things aswell
@Admire Kashiri Can't blame people on what they don't know. But yes the Nubian had the kushite empire which covered a lot of land. Some sources stating to Southend Spain but that's not fully agreed upon
@@darkzi1431 The 25th dynasty isn't unknown. You shouldn't listen to these "some sources" and I guess that by "not fully agreed upon" you mean "as agreed upon as Ancient Aliens".
@@Thulzor It's documented that they covered parts of east Africa and western Asia (Levant). But what is not 100% proven is the kushite rule in Spain. I say this because some say a town in Spain is named after the king Terhaqa of the 25th dynasty. But you can't know for sure
@@darkzi1431 "Some sources stating to Southend Spain but that's not fully agreed upon" Lmao no reliable scholar would believe that bullshit. The 25th dynasty covered Sudan, Egypt and parts of the Levant.
You guys are easily in my top three favorite channels and this series is among my favorite of your videos. I'm totally sold on CKIII and I'll definitely be ordering it through your link. I hope Paradox paid you guys well.
1066 really was the precipice of the modern world. Before it, Anglo Saxons still ruled England, half of Spain and Sicily were Muslim, the Romans were still one of the world’s great powers, and the Turks had not quite broken through.
After, England became England, Spain slowly became Spain, the Latin west established superiority over the orthodox east leading to the rise of Western Europe, the Romans’ terminal decline finally began, the Turks became a world power. A really, really fascinating time. Confusing, but extremely rewarding, to learn about.
Great video and thanks so much!
The game coming out at my birthday, the best gift I can hope for! Fantastic videos to get us in the mood.
So many interesting and diverse nations! *Proceeds to play only bizantium reconquest as a good EU4 player
Gurllll if you ain't lyin
I saw the nottification and I'm here. I've never been so fast. Thank you for your awesome and interesting content.
Greetings from Spain
The Hungarian-Polish-Croatian rise is to me the most fascinating in this era. Because we are all bombarded by the English/French/German, and muslim history all the time via tv shows or youtube, but no one digs deep in the central, and easter europe. How the heck did the small Polish, and croatian tribes manage to withstand the onslaugh of everyone and even have a kingdom at that time...lol
Echtelion Croats falls easy to Hungarians soon and remain around 900 years under their rule.
So, they didnt really managed to prosper.
@@vuksrb1480 well all tribes from the balkan peninsula fell quickly. But they had kingdoms before the norsemen, before the brits, or spanish, or even the french. I mean you had the Bulgarian Empire, the Serbian, and Croatian kingdoms 200-300years before England was even a thing. Ofc this kingdoms were small and week and they all soon fell to the Ottomans, and remaind under their rule for hundreds of years. But still they were there for some time
@@Ectheli0n you have right but the point of history is not a speed road of which one made the first kingdom, such as '' i had kingdom 30 years before you, i had kingdom 300 years before you, i had kingdom 150 before you, i had kingdom 1 year before you'' etc..
a kingdom, an empire, any political regimen is different and can be place anywhere in time. but there is a period that many specific regimens can be born. for example we have the periods of kingdomns, of empires, of tribal organizations, depending the people and the area.
all the people and the nations where at some point of history, bigger or smaller, under someone else or independent or autonomous. the world history is more complex.
@@vuksrb1480 Croatia was autonomous kingdom through entire of its history. It always retain its own Croatian Parliament (Hrvatski Sabor), untill 1918. Search on internet for document known as "Pacta conventa", where Hungarian king granted all previous rights and privilegies to Croatian noblemen. And Pavao Šubić, in year 1300, was ban of Croatia and master of Bosna (ban Hrvatske i gospodar Bosne) with its own metall-coined money; he brought new dinasty of Anjou from Napoli (Naples, Napulj) to the Hungarian throne. Also, Croatian Parliament elected independently in january 1527 in Cetingrad Ferdinand von Habsburg as a new king (there is existing document with this decision) , opposite to Hungarians who elected Johannes de Zapolia (Ivan Zapolja) for king. Croatian Parliament and autonomy was untill the 1918. But, after king Aleksandar Karađorđević was killed in 1934, regent Pavle understood that he had to make an agreement with Croats (Sporazum Cvetković-Maček) in 1939 (banovina Hrvatska within Kingdom of Jugoslavija). And so, while all Srbija was under Turkish Osmanlic goverment (15th to 19th century), Croatia had its own Parliament and autonomous rights. Many castles from northern Croatia built by Croatian noblemen (as Trakošćan, Veliki Tabor and so on) wittnes about prosperity and culture. Croats and Polaks are only two Slavic people with renaissance and baroque literature (Marko Marulić Marulus, the father of Croatian literature /1450-1527/, epic "Judita"; Ivan Gundulić, epic "Osman" and so on ...) During that time, Srbia was only reduced to be a province (pashaluk, vilayet) of Turkish Empire ... and there was no European culture in Srbia untill the 19th century ...
@@vuksrb1480 It didn't fall easy, considering the fact that it fought them back several times earlier. It was basically inherited by the Hungarian king.
🎶"Its the seljuk turks. Aah!"🎵
@@guzelataroach4450 look up bill wurtz history of the world on UA-cam.
@EXTRA LARGE But the history does HAHAHA
Ey this channel makes me happy every video is good and the quality gets better every video keep this up!
I’m so late that king Richard has already negotiated a truce with Saladin
*so early
Wrong period
TheMightyPenrak early would imply this happened in the past. king richard and saladin are like 300 years in the future
@@august8696 *100
What a great day!! K &G has uploaded!!
1066: It’s William the *CONQUEROR* *BOI*
More of Richard of Lionheart
The english throne rightfully belongs not to that damn bastard but to Norway! We may have failed to take that damn island in the viking age but this time around it shall be ours!
he made all bastards proud .
1071: knock knock. who is this?
ALPARSLAN THE SELJUK
All hail mighty Hardrada
Yall people are my favorite source of fun from history, thanks K&G and paradox
Cant understate how high quality this is.
i like this connetction between you and paradox.. its nicely interlocked and doesnt look like any adv or sellouts.. gj as always KandG team
lots of K&G vids use music from paradox in the past.
last time i was this early, The Roman Empire is still intact
@@stc3145 I'm sorry, i swear i tried to make you smile 😭😭😭
I mean i am still here
Still is
I bet this joke was actually funny when the HRE still existed.
you are late i saw the sumerians
Excellent and well balanced historical survey.
Yep. So true...
16:25 wow!as an indian thats one of the best maps i have seen in videos games showing india hats off to crusader kings.
@@pickle9974 yeah but also no cause some more centuries of golden period was coming but yeah that was under islam until these people came 🇬🇧🇬🇧
Pagal hai?
@@lakshaynegi82 who
@@pickle9974 ya still religions go against each other people dont understand that in old days conquest happened but now in modern times people cannot just go back to the countries where their ancestors came from.
@@pickle9974 thats also true i take back my words but the map is sure accurate
I love this overview of a specific time period. Please do more like this K&G!
I am no Hungarian expert, but the I am sure that the FIRST Hungarian king was called Stephen I, rather than Stephen II. It should be logical inasmuch as Stephen is a Christian name notwithstanding that the Hungarian language nowise roots from the Latin.
Maybe Stephen 1 was not a king but a duke?
@@Goratrix66 ahah I know, I checked wiki afterwards, but it was a good guess wasnt it?
You are right, Stephen I. was our first truly Christian ruler, who declared the conversion of the country, upgrading his title to king from grand-prince. And yes, it's his Christian name, he was called Vajk originally. I think they meant to say first, but made a mistake. But it's great to see that we are mentioned in this video, and that others are interested in our history.
And the name Stephen is the English version too, the Hungarian form is István.
@@mertkekevi3515 He was 'Fejedelem' what cant be translated to English, hence he is called 'Grand Prince', but in reality this title was closer to a Khagan than to a Prince.
I really like this series. Please do more of this format!
The medieval is interesting. Not just that it gives birth to many fantasy tales but also unique Kingdoms at the time. Some retained their original name to this day and some doesn't.
Kamu orang Malaysia?
@@ahmadkamil3713 👋🐯
This was absolutely lovely. Thank you!
I wish there'll be 732 AD start date " Battle of tours " it's a turning point in both European and Islamic history
or even back to 717 AD " siege of Constantinople"
He uploaded video for siege of constantinople in 717
@@ghostd69 I mean a starting date in CK3
@@azgamers they are ck2 date of 769 date charles the hammer grandson charmage it is sad just two start date in ck3😢
Holy smokes what a great video, definitely deserves a sub.
No mention of what was going on in the steppes? Missed opportunity.
They did mention the steppes. There just wasn't much to talk about, since the Cuman effectively dominated it, and were the cause of all the conflict between the pechenegs (who were also mentioned) and the Romans, and the other steppe peoples getting pushed out.
@@Leivve What about the Volga Bulgarians? They had recently accepted Islam and were a dominant force in the region. Things could be said about the Finno-Ugric tribes and the rest of the Altaic people.
Mad Hatters in jeans china and japan are not on the CK3 map
@@Rishi99909 which is sad since there is so much wasted potential.
@@BlackWolf9988 no there is not I would not want to plat child emperors all time I guees japan would nice but is Crusader kings so it is about mainly middle east and Europe.
Good Mardook!, I love these Global year over views. It's tying together dozens of the other deep dive videos.
I've learned more about history in the last 5 months than in the previous 10 years thanks to channels like K&J, Invictus and a few others.
Nice to see that you also included Nubia (Makuria)! Normally it just gets skipped in these kind of videos.
You guys should do this for future start dates of the game as well whenever they decide to release them in future dlc,fantastic video as always.
Skipping Croatia on hight of power is dissapointing
We're used to it, god forbid anyone mentioned us in anything even if we were relevant. I have read books and seen documentaries of the Ottoman incursions into Europe that mentioned even Poland more than us!
@@overlord165 Croatia needs a Sabaton song for a decisive battle won against the Ottomans. You can bet people would care more after that.
@@wildfire9280 Yupp, they have written two about Serbia but then again, Croatia is constantly ignored so I would be surprised if they even knew what "a Croatia" even is
@JD D'aww
Yes, they keep ignoring Croatia on purpose. Even though at that time Croatia was more relevant than England.
Great collaboration. I never regret subscribing to you.
6:53 Sorry but William gained his nickname ''the Conqueror'' after the invasion.
This is amazing. Wow! Good stuff K & G as always!!!!!
I heard the Normans are here and I came as quickly as I could.
Great video guys, really appreciate being able to enjoy History like this !!!!
You broke my heart by not even slightly mentioning georgia, which would have its golden age in several decades and being one of the prominent powers in the region 💔
absolutely. such a fascinating, important, but all too often overlooked kingdom/region.
@Kings and Generals only way to repent is to make in depth review of battle of Didgori and king david the builder 😂😂❤️
P. S. I dont think that there are many battles in hostory where 55000 man strong army completely routs army of 250 000 man
@@levani2297 I seriously doubt those numbers, as in medieval times logistic didn't allow more than couple of dozens thousand soldiers..
I love these! You guys need to do more. It's nice because it puts a lot of different nations status together and offers a different perspective.
Remember when we used to joke about how Paradox wouldn't make a 3rd game
This is reality now
*Feel old yet?*
Really enjoyed these videos hope there are more like this
I can't donate because of having no credit card but I always click on the ads of your videos . A small donation indeed
What a great year to make a game about. Awesome, can't wait!
Unusual to see the County of Portucale - from which Portugal was born - displayed as part of the Kingdom of Galicia. In fact, that's correct, but we are so used to associate the County under the Kingdom of León that this seems (almost) odd.
Great video as always guys. You guys are my favorite channel on UA-cam. I also bought crusader kings 3 and it is a great game
3:46 racially motivated? I'm no history expert, but weren't the persecutions of Jewish people religiously motivated? I thought racial antisemitism only became a thing around the 19th century, but now I am curious, what traces are there of racially motivated antisemitism in 1066?
Wants to stay monetized
@@savioblanc The Jews were subject to the same amount of prosecution in Europe.
I assume "racially motivated" in this case is supposed to mean "because they were seen as foreigners". Not strictly "race"-based like since the 19th century but with more than just religious motivations.
I think it meant that it was meant more towards ethnic based violence as ethnic Jews are in the same race as other ethnic European/Middle Eastern groups.
It was both religiously and racially motivated. They didnt persecute other religions as badly
Really awesome of you guys to mention African states below the Sahara. It paints a much clearer picture of the old world in 1066. Way better then having an awkward blank spot under North Africa.
Brilliant video! I would be very interested if K&G continued to make content like this, of interesting dates and what was going on around the world at that time. It would help put a lot of events into better perspective!
I'm never one to subscribe, like or comment but I did so this time because of how much I liked the video. I'm an eu4 fan but that's not what brings me here. I've enjoyed your content for years but this type of format is the best I've seen so far. Keep it up!
I remember your Battle of Manzikert video. One of the most liked comments was suggesting that Alp Arslan meant Heroic Lion in turkish.
Jazakallah keir man you really are a great person for taking an interest into this. Especially since a lot of Muslims have either forgotten or ignored their history.
İf Seljuks didn't save Abbasids the sunni İslamic world would became murtad shia/rafidah
May God accept our grandfather Sultan Alparslan in his paradise insaAllah.
Basil II was truly one of the best rulers ever. Hoping he’ll get an episode soon ❤️
Cant wait to prevent the Manzikert debacle as Michael VII Doukas! 😁
Oh god it's Basil the Bulgar Slayer isn't it
Fiendish yesireee. Unless if you’re Bulgarian then he’s the worst 😂
@@kaizikenpinas who gave him such a badass sounding title anyway
great video guys, the detail on those maps is really impressive. Wish i could have as a wallpaper
William the Conqueror looks like Rollo from the Vikings after becoming a Duke of Normandy.
That is his great great great great grandfather
Late for me but still great work, even the way you put the game map in was nice! Thanks Fellas!
Loved it when you mentioned Chola . Lots of love from Tamil Nadu, India
whats the pont of cholas without south east asia.
One of the best videos I've seen from you guy's yet.
Marvelous explanation in detail, could listen to hours of this and not be bored one tiny bit!
2:54 - I think you meant Stephen I, because he embraced Chatolicism, Stephen II was ruling from 1116-1131.
Nevertheless it was a great video, I learnt much about my favorite subject, History! It was just bothering me... :)
Keep doing videos like this for other time periods. Great job
Funny thing is that no one will ever choose this date since people usually pick earliest start
Alot of people like the 1066 start date aswell. So i think many people will play it aswell.
@@MeldinX2 Maybe, I don't know much about CK but I play EU4 alot and I have never picked any date besides 1444
I pick early dates for achievements mainly like in CK2 some achievements have set start dates or 867 for example has an independent Zoroastrian ruler who is not a horde.
@@filipz8831 EU4 has other issues that make 1444 the start to choose, The later start dates aren't in a particularly good state given that they haven't been maintained and updated with all the DLC releases and that's before you get into how busted the game gets when you switch between dates before you've even started the game.
FilipZ A lot of People play 1066 this isn’t EU4 where the other starts are broken and never updated 1066 is the OG Ck2 Start And alongside 769 and 867 the most popular start in Ck2.
I pressed the like button, but as soon as I saw the length of the video I thought it was too short for this huge topic. I believe this could have been a 2-part video. Not saying the video was bad, quite the contrary!
I LOVE KINGS AND GENERALS ❤️
What's not to love
One of your best, thank you folks!
Excellent scholarship!
Such a vast geography, covered and animated so clearly!
Maybe I’ll try the game ;)
CK3 is my favorite game of all time for good reason! Great video, I really enjoyed it!
Hail Alexios I Kommenos
I dunno why, playing him in ck2 was annoying for me. Everytime i was ready to holy war Rum there would always be a disease outbreak in constantinople so i cant personally lead them
@@danendraaryadewa5455 The solution is to never be in Constantinople, always lead the army. That is the only way one may play Alexios I Komnenos.
...Unless that doesn't work either :P
@FattyFludders Yup. May have slowly decayed the Imperial Court, but it did stabilize the Empire.
Good overview. 1099 what a year, so many people were legends around these years.
2066 is going to be 🔥🔥🔥
Prime Minister William the Bastard is going to kick Godwin's ass
Again a very good video. In 1066 the most important event was the conquer of England by Franks in battle of Hastings which you have already presented. Since anglosaxons were in moral collapse, they easily accepted catholic faith of franks which determined their history thereafter.
In the future there will be a UA-cam channel called Presidents and Spaceship Commanders make a video about World in Year 2020.
God-Emperors and Lords-Solar
Congrats. I hope you don't forget to have an episode regarding the Investiture Controversy
Alternate History:
Instead of Crossing the Rubicon in 49 BCE, Caesar is transported to 1066 AD With all of his Gallic Legions.
The question isn't about what will Caesar Do.
The question is, whether Europe will survive or Not.
DespoticTyrant Cesar is about to die of camp fever bro
Nevermind that, all his men are gonna starve to death bro since theres no supplies
Thats sounds like a brilliant plot for some movie XD I would defenitely watch that
I bet you the Anglo-Saxons would have crushed him.
They are going to get fucked by 11th century cavalry, sorry mate
I learn so much from this channel. Thank you.
Harald Bluetooth did NOT "introduce" christianity to Denmark
He instead introduced modern technology to Denmark, kickstarting a Danish Golden Age
@@fiendish9474 What?
@@erikdk321 a Bluetooth joke
@@fiendish9474 ah shit
I love the voiceover for this channel
The Byzantines didn't convert Bulgarian Kingdom .. The Bulgarian Kingdom converted in 865 to Orthodoxy, 200 years before the date in the video.
@@fonthracian7042 Зависи и какво е записано в тяхната литература.
yeah? well, buddy, the byzantines existed during that era, and where pretty much the only orthodox-christian power at that time that could compete against the pope attempting to convert the bulgar kingdom to christianity (the western one).
@@digitalshadow7968 The Frankish empire existed too at that time and were one of the biggest by they didn't converted England for example, did they? Everything is more complicated with politics even back then.
@@hristorusanov23 no, I didn't mean that the Byzantine were the only Christian power back then. I of course knew of the Frankish kingdoms and their legacy. My point was that it was the Byzantine v pope primarily in the east trying to convert Bulgaria into their own branches of Christianity. One being the orthodox sect of Christianity, and the other being the Catholics. Though I do admit that I didn't know that the bulgar kingdom first converted to Catholics Christianity before becoming orthodox, so I admit my mistake on that one.
@@fonthracian7042 sorry 'bout that. I usually just call them 'kingdoms' for easier clarifications. Though I do get your point.
Why was I only recommended this now? I love Both this channel and game!?
Can you make a video about the history of North Africa during the age of Roman Empire .
I like this format! Great work! More of it please!
Probably gonna wait for review on this game Still disappointed about imperator rome