Some errors in the radar section. The SU-35 uses the Irbis radar not the Irbis-E the E stand for export. The frontal view is 120 degrees per side or 240 degrees total. N035 Irbis has several BVR and WVR A2A combat modes and can detect/track incoming aircraft with RSC 0.01sqm from 100kms, 0.1sqm from about 180kms ,1 sqm from about 270kms and 3sqm from 400kms. The Russian do have a missile that combines the characteristics of R-37 and R-77-1 it is the R-77M with an AESA seeker and range of 193kms+. It was designed for SU-57 and Sukhoi has not said whether it will be used SU-35.
The Irbis range of 400km for a 3 sqm target is for the mode with a super narrow search field designated by an AWACS or ESM system. In standard search mode the range is approximately half this. Regarding the R-77M, everything indicates that it is not yet operational.
All radar ranges are given at the narrowest beam and maximum range to act like that is not the common practice is dishonest. Do you think they did any differently for the Gripen? As for R-77M it is only for SU-57 and not the SU-35. It completed testing years ago and went into small batch production. There are definitely not enough to waste in Ukraine.
I just tested the SU35 vs F35 in the commercial version of "Command Modern Operations". This version will not give AS realistic simulations as the professional version (which cost from 1800 to 24.000 dollars - per year, LOL!), but from what i can find, it is still good enough to give a reasonably good estimate... I activated all sensors (radars and stuff) on both jets, and the F-35 registered an "unknown air contact" signal from the SU-35 at around 375 nautical miles distance. At 370 nautical miles, it was able to identify it as a fighter, and more specifically either a SU30 or SU35. At 146 nautical miles the signal was specified to be a "SU35S Flanker M". The F35 carried 6x "AIM-120D AMRAAM P3I.4" missiles have a range of 86 nautical miles, and the F35 fired as soon as it got in range. Once the missile was 17 nautical miles from the SU35, it popped up on its radar, but the F-35s is still nowhere to be seen. I used 5 of each plane, and the SU35s didnt even have a chance. When i tried using just a single F35, it quickly ran out of missiles, and after 5 attempts, it had only been able to destroy 1.4 SU35 on average. This allowed the F35 to get very close to the SU35, which still didnt notice the F35 until it was only 6 nautical miles away. I then tried two F35s, and in the first 4 attempts, all SU35s got taken down pretty quickly. The 5th time however, the F35s ran out of missiles, leaving a single SU35 alive. In reality the F35s would have left when they ran out of missiles, but i let it continue on its path towards the SU35, which was eventually able to take out one of the F35s.
EXCELLENT description of the BVR capabilities and counter measures defense of both aircraft. Thanks very much. Greetings from Mexico City.
Gripen is build for take down Sus!😊
YOU ARE RIGHT IN ALL THAT YOU HAVE SAYED
Some errors in the radar section. The SU-35 uses the Irbis radar not the Irbis-E the E stand for export. The frontal view is 120 degrees per side or 240 degrees total. N035 Irbis has several BVR and WVR A2A combat modes and can detect/track incoming aircraft with RSC 0.01sqm from 100kms, 0.1sqm from about 180kms ,1 sqm from about 270kms and 3sqm from 400kms.
The Russian do have a missile that combines the characteristics of R-37 and R-77-1 it is the R-77M with an AESA seeker and range of 193kms+. It was designed for SU-57 and Sukhoi has not said whether it will be used SU-35.
The Irbis range of 400km for a 3 sqm target is for the mode with a super narrow search field designated by an AWACS or ESM system. In standard search mode the range is approximately half this.
Regarding the R-77M, everything indicates that it is not yet operational.
All radar ranges are given at the narrowest beam and maximum range to act like that is not the common practice is dishonest. Do you think they did any differently for the Gripen? As for R-77M it is only for SU-57 and not the SU-35. It completed testing years ago and went into small batch production. There are definitely not enough to waste in Ukraine.
Agree.
Any stealth fighter can not face russian su35 ....su35 can detect stelth fighter from 100 km
I just tested the SU35 vs F35 in the commercial version of "Command Modern Operations". This version will not give AS realistic simulations as the professional version (which cost from 1800 to 24.000 dollars - per year, LOL!), but from what i can find, it is still good enough to give a reasonably good estimate...
I activated all sensors (radars and stuff) on both jets, and the F-35 registered an "unknown air contact" signal from the SU-35 at around 375 nautical miles distance. At 370 nautical miles, it was able to identify it as a fighter, and more specifically either a SU30 or SU35. At 146 nautical miles the signal was specified to be a "SU35S Flanker M". The F35 carried 6x "AIM-120D AMRAAM P3I.4" missiles have a range of 86 nautical miles, and the F35 fired as soon as it got in range. Once the missile was 17 nautical miles from the SU35, it popped up on its radar, but the F-35s is still nowhere to be seen. I used 5 of each plane, and the SU35s didnt even have a chance. When i tried using just a single F35, it quickly ran out of missiles, and after 5 attempts, it had only been able to destroy 1.4 SU35 on average. This allowed the F35 to get very close to the SU35, which still didnt notice the F35 until it was only 6 nautical miles away. I then tried two F35s, and in the first 4 attempts, all SU35s got taken down pretty quickly. The 5th time however, the F35s ran out of missiles, leaving a single SU35 alive. In reality the F35s would have left when they ran out of missiles, but i let it continue on its path towards the SU35, which was eventually able to take out one of the F35s.
Gripen only a toy agents russia fighter.....