There will not be a Z90 AND a Z50 Mark II. There will be one or the other, but most likely a "Z80" with similar specs to a Z8 but obviously an APSC camera. So it will inherit much of the Z8/Z9 tech, but will still have its limitations. I don't think they will continue to use the Z50 line name though because people may consider that to be inferior even though it wouldn't necessarily be, but just by name since the Z50 will have been out for about 5 years now without any updates, and so people probably wouldn't think too highly of one anyway, but a "Z80" would be more appealing and people may be able to make the association between a Z80 and a Z8 (could also be a Z60 to mirror the Z6 III but an 20MP ASPC version).
Keeping alive a product line by making small ittarations and naming then i,ii,iii etc etc isn't going to payoff... What Nikon should do instead is introduction of rock solid model with regular firmware updates... By not doing or by delaying this Nikon is going to lose it's customer base....
There will not be a Z90 AND a Z50 Mark II. There will be one or the other, but most likely a "Z80" with similar specs to a Z8 but obviously an APSC camera. So it will inherit much of the Z8/Z9 tech, but will still have its limitations. I don't think they will continue to use the Z50 line name though because people may consider that to be inferior even though it wouldn't necessarily be, but just by name since the Z50 will have been out for about 5 years now without any updates, and so people probably wouldn't think too highly of one anyway, but a "Z80" would be more appealing and people may be able to make the association between a Z80 and a Z8 (could also be a Z60 to mirror the Z6 III but an 20MP ASPC version).
Keeping alive a product line by making small ittarations and naming then i,ii,iii etc etc isn't going to payoff... What Nikon should do instead is introduction of rock solid model with regular firmware updates... By not doing or by delaying this Nikon is going to lose it's customer base....