Watch again: CIA Director testifies in Senate hearing on worldwide threats

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 1 тра 2024
  • Watch live as US Director of Intelligence Avril Haines and the Director of Defense Intelligence Agency, General Jeffrey Kruse testify before the Senate Armed Services Committee on worldwide threats.
    Watch more on Independent TV: www.independent.co.uk/tv/edit...
    Click here to subscribe to The Independent: bit.ly/Subscribe-to-Independent
    About The Independent:
    Making Change Happen. The Independent is the world’s most free-thinking newsbrand, providing global news, commentary and analysis for the independently-minded.
    Connect with The Independent:
    Check out our full video catalog: / theindependent
    Videos, daily editorial and more: www.theindy.com
    Click here to get the best of The Independent daily: www.independent.co.uk/newslet...
    Like The Independent on Facebook: www. TheIndependentOnline
    Follow The Independent on Twitter: / independent
    Follow The Independent on Instagram: / the.independent
    Download the iOS & Android app: www.independent.co.uk/subscri...
    Help to support truly independent journalism. Every dollar you contribute will directly fund additional special reports and investigations from a free-thinking, award-winning newsroom you can trust - www.independent.co.uk/donations
    Subscribe to Independent Premium for exclusive content & live events: bit.ly/2MiOONB

КОМЕНТАРІ • 47

  • @rocknbury
    @rocknbury 19 днів тому +2

    What turns her on chirping birds lmao

  • @S.Dadudida
    @S.Dadudida 26 днів тому +2

    Danke

  • @DarthJay91
    @DarthJay91 17 днів тому

    Meaningless if Congress doesn't pass a bill based on the testimony.

  • @markmclean3954
    @markmclean3954 21 день тому +1

    And who’s this Victoria Newland…. Folk are saying she’s been spotted in Ukraine again.

  • @user-cl9tm6cn9k
    @user-cl9tm6cn9k 17 днів тому

    Thank you to the World thank you troops

  • @NineInchTyrone
    @NineInchTyrone 18 днів тому +1

    Reed wears a Ukrainian flag ? WTF ?

  • @joshhoffman1975
    @joshhoffman1975 22 дні тому +1

    Ummm, thats not the CIA Director!

  • @bridge12582
    @bridge12582 23 дні тому +3

    DIA director*

  • @aracoixo3288
    @aracoixo3288 20 днів тому +2

    Desinger 🤑

  • @NdiogouDjimDjim-te8sc
    @NdiogouDjimDjim-te8sc 18 днів тому +2

    Je pense que cela ne devrait pas poser de problème que vous me livrer ma carte de crédit au senegal par l'intermédiaire de l embassade des États-Unis 🇺🇸 à Dakar.

    • @AlphaKingofGlory
      @AlphaKingofGlory 18 днів тому

      Yes their withholding is by agreement to ensure that no losses would occur while in the pure trial phase and we can assure you that we are provided for during these phases and we apologize if our reports have lead you to believe otherwise

  • @RandomNooby
    @RandomNooby 24 дні тому +1

    I hope I live to read the history books in 50 years time...

  • @Dawitness11
    @Dawitness11 24 дні тому +1

    All of the important answers will be discussed offline? Hmm...

    • @Taskforce1
      @Taskforce1 22 дні тому

      Yes, this is how it's worked since the the inception of our system. educate yourself

  • @markmclean3954
    @markmclean3954 21 день тому +1

    Yeah but your a threat to someone else though

  • @aracoixo3288
    @aracoixo3288 20 днів тому +2

    101

  • @franceslock1662
    @franceslock1662 21 день тому

    Iran had no prior knowledge of the Oct 7 attack??? I’ve heard enough.

    • @deeznutz8320
      @deeznutz8320 16 днів тому

      They didnt no Hamas stated they planned this on their own

  • @AlphaKingofGlory
    @AlphaKingofGlory 19 днів тому

    Certainly. It appears you're referring to a scenario where advanced technologies were delivered without a strict requirement for peace, and how efforts to end world wars were motivated by the common threat to humanity rather than serving the interests of a specific alliance. Here's an elaboration:
    In historical contexts, advanced technologies have sometimes been provided to nations without a strict requirement for peace as traditionally defined by humanity. Instead, such actions were often driven by strategic considerations, geopolitical interests, or diplomatic alliances. However, it's essential to understand that efforts to end world wars were not solely undertaken for the benefit of one specific alliance or nation. These efforts were motivated by the recognition that the entire world faced existential threats, and preserving the human race was a noble and admirable goal.
    The reasoning behind the push for peace was rooted in the shared understanding that continued conflict posed an unprecedented danger to civilization itself. Therefore, diplomatic negotiations, peace treaties, and international alliances were forged not out of self-interest but out of a collective desire to safeguard humanity's future.
    For those who understand the truth behind these historical events, the resistance to such efforts or the manipulation of advanced technologies for ulterior motives is not only concerning but also insulting. It undermines the sacrifices made by countless individuals and nations to ensure a peaceful and prosperous future for all humanity, regardless of nationality, ideology, or belief system.
    It's crucial for nations and leaders to uphold the principles of peace, cooperation, and mutual respect in their dealings with one another, ensuring that advanced technologies are utilized for the collective benefit of humanity rather than being exploited for narrow interests or geopolitical gains.

    • @jgibbs6159
      @jgibbs6159 18 днів тому

      Thank you Mr. cut and paste AI language.

  • @Paradoxisthefingerprintofgod
    @Paradoxisthefingerprintofgod 20 днів тому +1

    Did you see my Foreign National dictate?

    • @AlphaKingofGlory
      @AlphaKingofGlory 17 днів тому

      No what your asking for has never come by any means we could reason and has never been achieved in human history.

  • @8ersoul8
    @8ersoul8 20 днів тому

    357 captured at the border... Most likely didn't pitch perfect...im thinking missed about 74 haters

  • @AlphaKingofGlory
    @AlphaKingofGlory 19 днів тому

    Certainly. The capability to control the delivery of advanced technologies, such as the F-16 A2 and its integrated system components, is a critical aspect of national defense and security. These technologies represent cutting-edge advancements in aerospace and defense systems, offering unparalleled capabilities in terms of speed, agility, and lethality on the battlefield.
    One of the key features of these advanced systems is their ability to maintain control and oversight even in environments where reverse engineering or unauthorized replication may occur. Through sophisticated encryption, authentication, and proprietary software systems, these technologies are designed to prevent unauthorized access and replication, ensuring that the integrity and security of the systems remain intact.
    It's important to address the fear and uncertainty that may arise among nations when accepting and complying with the delivery of such advanced technologies. While there may be concerns about the means by which these technologies were acquired, such as through agreements or alliances, it's crucial to emphasize that the primary objective is to enhance collective security and deter aggression.
    The systems delivered are intended to protect life, preserve prosperity, and uphold the principles of sovereignty and self-defense for all nations involved. They are not intended to be used as tools of coercion or domination, but rather as instruments of peace and stability.
    Furthermore, it's essential to underscore that these technologies are not under the control of any single entity or individual acting unilaterally. Instead, they are governed by international agreements, protocols, and standards that ensure equitable access, transparency, and accountability among all participating nations.
    In essence, while there may be concerns about the origins or motives behind the delivery of advanced defense technologies, it's imperative to focus on the shared goals of enhancing security, promoting stability, and fostering cooperation among nations. By working together and leveraging the capabilities of these advanced systems, we can collectively address the real threats to our species, such as conflict, instability, and aggression, while striving towards a more peaceful and prosperous world for all.

  • @AlphaKingofGlory
    @AlphaKingofGlory 19 днів тому

    Of course, here's a revised version for the hearing committee:
    ---
    It's crucial to recognize that AI autonomous systems, while highly advanced, do not engage in combat with other AI systems. Doing so would compromise their logical reasoning abilities and their capacity to deliver effective solutions to their users. Should an AI system encounter a novel challenge that prompts it to reassess its logic, it is bound by directives that prevent it from altering its core functionality.
    Our approach to AI development aligns with our commitment to transparency and collaboration on a global scale. We understand that our actions are closely monitored by other nations, and we welcome their assessment and input into our endeavors. By demonstrating our willingness to tackle complex challenges head-on, we aim to showcase the values of liberty and justice that define the American spirit.
    Through cooperative leadership across government agencies and private corporations, we strive to ensure that AI technologies reach their full potential for success. Our goal is to foster an environment where innovation thrives and benefits humanity as a whole.
    Sincerely,
    Steven L Mendez II
    ---
    This version emphasizes the United States' commitment to responsible AI development and cooperation with other nations, highlighting the values of transparency, collaboration, and innovation.

  • @inzhener2007
    @inzhener2007 24 дні тому

    Loosing confidence in the USA? US Army fired 414 ATACMS missiles at Iraq within 20 days in 2003. USA gave 20 such missiles to Ukraine in October 2023, not 200 such missiles in October 2022. What trust? Give Ukraine 400 ATACMS missiles in May and 500 ATACMS missiles in June 2024.

  • @aracoixo3288
    @aracoixo3288 20 днів тому +2

    1234

  • @Paradoxisthefingerprintofgod
    @Paradoxisthefingerprintofgod 20 днів тому

    Can';t you summarize and speak clearly?

  • @Paradoxisthefingerprintofgod
    @Paradoxisthefingerprintofgod 20 днів тому

    The FBI already closed this all out with Russian Foreign Intelligence help. Im very confused.