As an ex-Mormon I empathize a lot with ex-Muslims. That pain, that familial pressure and ultimate rejection if you leave. I know I lost everything when I left...EVERYTHING. I pray for this brave one, God bless you brother ✝
Schlözer in his preparation for the Arabia expedition in 1781 coined the term Semitic language: "From the Mediterranean to the Euphrates, from Mesopotamia to Arabia ruled one language, as is well known. Thus Syrians, Babylonians, Hebrews, and Arabs were one people (ein Volk). Phoenicians (Hamites) also spoke this language, which I would like to call the Semitic (die Semitische)." -Before Boas: The Genesis of Ethnography and Ethnology in the German By Han F. Vermeulen He was only half right though, Arabic is the only corollary to "proto-semitic", infact the whole semitic classification is nonsensical for anyone with a somewhat functioning mass between their ears. hebrew, aramaic, rest of madeup dialect continua only have 22 letters of the 29 protosemitic letters Arabic has all 29. The difference betweeen Arabic and the other creoles and Pidgin is the same as that between Latin and pig latin or italian. |Classical Arabic | 28 consonants, 29 with Hamza and 6 vowels; some consonants are emphatic or pharyngealized; some vowels are marked with diacritics | Complex system of word formation based on roots and patterns; roots are sequences of consonants that carry the basic meaning of a word; patterns are sequences of vowels and affixes that modify the meaning and function of a word | Flexible word order, but VSO is most common; SVO is also possible; subject and object are marked by case endings (-u for nominative, -a for accusative, -i for genitive); verb agrees with subject in person, number, and gender; verb has different forms for different moods and aspects | | Akkadian | 22 consonants and 3 vowels; some consonants are glottalized or palatalized; vowels are not marked | Similar system, but with different roots and patterns; some roots have more than three consonants; some patterns have infixes or reduplication | Fixed word order of SVO; subject and object are not marked by case endings, but by prepositions or word order; verb agrees with subject in person, number, and gender; verb has different forms for different tenses and aspects | | Aramaic | 22 consonants and 3 vowels (later variants have more); no emphatic or pharyngealized consonants (except in some dialects); vowels are not marked (except in later variants such as Syriac) | Simple system of word formation based on prefixes and suffixes; some roots or patterns exist, but are less productive than in Arabic or Akkadian | "Semitic" is just mumbled Arabic, really. Imagine English with a third of its letters removed and simplified grammar. That's Aramaic, Hebrew, etc. For example, combine T and D into just T; there's no need to have 2 letters. The same goes for i, e, y - they should all be just y from now on, etc., etc. Arabic is the only corollary to proto-Semitic. In fact, the whole classification of Semitic languages is nonsensical for anyone with a somewhat functioning brain. Hebrew, Aramaic, and the rest of these made-up dialect continua only have 22 letters out of the 29 proto-Semitic letters. Arabic has all 29. The difference between Arabic and the other creoles and Pidgin is the same as the difference between Latin and pig Latin or Italian. "Phoenician" is an Arabic dialect continuum, and not only that, it is pidgin. It is simplified to the point of stupidity. Anyone with a basic knowledge of Arabic would see this clearly. What happened was that Arabic handicapped "scholars" saw the equivalent of Scottish Twitter spelling, with added mumbling due to phonemic mergers (22 letters, not 29), and mistakenly thought they were seeing a different language." Let's start with a simple sentence: ## The house is big Arabic: البيتُ كبيرٌ al-bayt-u kabīr-un Proto-Semitic: *ʔal-bayt-u kabīr-u Hebrew: הבית גדול ha-bayit gadol Akkadian: bītum rabûm Amharic: ቤቱ ገደሉ betu gedelu As can be seen, Arabic and Proto-Semitic have the same word order (noun-adjective), the same definite article (al-), and the same case endings (-u for nominative). Hebrew and Akkadian have lost the case endings and changed the definite article (ha- and -um respectively). Amharic has changed the word order (adjective-noun) and the definite article (u-). But Arabic is not only similar to Proto-Semitic, it is also pre-Semitic, meaning that it is the original form of Semitic before it split into different branches. This is because Arabic preserves many features that are not found in any other Semitic language, but are found in other Afro-Asiatic languages, such as Egyptian and Berber. These features include: - The definite article al-, which is derived from the demonstrative pronoun *ʔal- 'that'. This article is unique to Arabic among Semitic languages, but it is similar to the article n- in Berber and the article p-, t-, n- in Egyptian. - The dual number for nouns and verbs, which is marked by the suffix -ān or -ayn. This number is rare in other Semitic languages, but it is common in other Afro-Asiatic languages, such as Egyptian and Berber. - The imperfective prefix t- for verbs, which indicates the second person singular feminine or third person plural feminine. This prefix is unique to Arabic among Semitic languages, but it is similar to the prefix t- in Berber and Egyptian. - The passive voice for verbs, which is marked by the infix t between the first and second root consonants. This voice is unique to Arabic among Semitic languages, but it is similar to the passive voice in Egyptian and Berber. Finally, a more complex sentence: The letter was written with a pen. Arabic: كُتِبَتِ الرِّسَالَةُ بِالقَلَمِ kutiba-t al-risāla-t-u bi-l-qalam-i Proto-Semitic: *kutiba-t ʔal-risāla-t-u bi-l-qalam-i Hebrew: המכתב נכתב בעט ha-michtav niktav ba-et Akkadian: šipram šapāru bēlum Egyptian: sḏm.n.f p-ẖry m rnp.t Berber: tturra-t tibratin s uccen Here, Arabic and Proto-Semitic have the same word order (verb-subject-object), the same passive voice marker (-t-), the same definite article (al-), and the same preposition (bi-). Hebrew has changed the word order (subject-verb-object), lost the passive voice marker, changed the definite article (ha-) and the preposition (ba-). Akkadian has changed the word order (object-subject-verb), lost the passive voice marker, changed the definite article (-um) and the preposition (bēlum). Now how is it that the Qur'an came thousands of years in a language that is lexically, syntactically, phonemically, and semantically older than the oldest recorded writing? Now how is it that the Qur'an came thousands of years later in an alphabet that had never been recorded before, and in the highest form the language had ever taken? The creator is neither bound by time nor space, therefore the names are uttered as they truly were, in a language that is lexically, syntactically, phonemically, and semantically older than the oldest recorded writing. In fact, that writing appears to have been a simplified version of it. Not only that, but it would be the equivalent of the greatest works of any particular language all appearing in one book, in a perfect script and in the highest form the language could ever take. It is so high in fact, that it had yet to be surpassed despite the fact that over the last millennium the collection of Arabic manuscripts when compared on word-per-word basis in Western Museums alone, when they are compared with the collected Greek and Latin manuscripts combined, the latter does not constitute 1 percent of the former as per German professor Frank Griffel, in addition all in a script that had never been recorded before. Thus, the enlightenment of mankind from barbarism and savagery began, and the age of reason and rationality was born from its study. God did bring down the Qur’an, Mohamed is his Messenger.
The Aramaic word for God is Alaha. It's the word Isa PBUH (Jesus as his name is often misspelled due to the lack of the ayin sound in Greek, which was rendered to Iesous, coupling the nearest sound to ayin, same letter found in 'Iraq', which sounds entirely different in Arabic form 'Iran' in Arabic, with the -ous Greek suffix that Greeks typically add to their names 'HerodotOS', 'PlotinUS', 'AchelOUS' and later mumbled into a J). Sounds familiar? Written without the confusing vowels, it is A-L-H ܐ ܠܗܐ (alap-lamed-he) as found in Targum or in Tanakh (Daniel, Ezra), Syriac Aramaic (Peshitta), adducted from the Arabic original (of which Aramaic is a dialect continuum) 'A-L-L-H' (Aleph-Lam-Lam-Ha). The yeshua rendition of Isa (his name in the Qur'an) PBUH which is purported to be the name of Jesus is KNOWN to had been taken from greek. Western Syriac also use "Isho". Western Aramaic (separate from Syriac which is a dialect of Eastern Aramaic) use "Yeshu". Western Syriac has been separate from Western Aramaic for about 1000 years. And sounds don't even match up. Syriac is a Christian liturgical language yet the four letters of the name of Jesus «ܝܫܘܥ» [ = Judeo-Babylonian Aramaic: «ישוע» ] sounds totally different in West vs East Syriac, viz. vocalized akin to Christian Arabic, Hebrew, Aramaic «ܝܶܫܽܘܥ» (Yēšūʿ) in West Syriac, but pronounced more akin to Muslim Arabic Quran character name Isa in East Syriac «ܝܑܼܫܘܿܥ» (ʾĪšōʿ). The reason for this confusion is their dropping of phonemes as aforementioned. Only someone that has no idea what the letters are or how they sound would have a name ending in a pharyngeal fricative like the ayin, if it were to be used in a name it would have had to be in the beginning, thus the Arabic rendition is the correct one. In addition, The word God in hebrew is eloah, is a cognate of the Arabic I-L-H, pronounced ilah not eloah. Hebrew dropped the glottal stop and mumbled it into eloh, aramic mumbled a little less and it became elah. Infact it is written A-L-H in Arabic, it is pronounced i in Arabic cause it is an Alef with hamza below (إ أ ) They are two different forms of Alef. And it mean "a god", it is the non definitive form of A-L-L-H, in which the Alef is without a glottal stop/hamza,(ا) "protosemetic" Alphabet (29), Arabic Alphabet (28), Latin transliteration, hebrew (22) 𐩠 𐩡 𐩢 𐩣 𐩤 𐩥 𐩦 𐩧 𐩨 𐩩 𐩪 𐩫 𐩬 𐩭 𐩮 𐩰 𐩱 𐩲 𐩳 𐩴 𐩵 𐩶 𐩷 𐩸 𐩹 𐩺 𐩻 𐩼 ا ب ت ث ج ح خ د ذ ر ز س ش ص ض ط ظ ع غ ف ق ك ل م ن ه و ي A b t ṯ j h kh d ḏ r z s sh ṣ ḍ ṭ ẓ ʿ ġ f q k l m n h w y א ב ג ד ה ו ז ח ט י כ ל מ נ ס ע פ צ ק ר ש ת Merged phonemes in hebrew and aramaic: ح, خ (h, kh) merged into only kh consonant remain س, ش (s, sh) merged into only Shin consonant remaining ط, ظ (ṭ/teth, ẓ) merged into only ṭ/teth consonant remaining ص, ض (ṣ, ḍ/Tsad ) merged into only ḍ/Tsad consonant remaining ع, غ (3'ayn, Ghayn) merged into a reducted ayin consonant remaining ت, ث (t/taw, th) merged into only t/taw consonant remaining The reason why the protoS alphabet here is 28 and not 29, is because the supposed extra letter is simply a س written in a different position, but it was shoehorned to obfuscated. In Arabic letter shapes are different depending on whether they are in the beginning , middle or end of a word. This kind of nuance is lost in the dialect continua. As a matter of fact, all of the knowledge needed for deciphering ancient texts and their complexity was derived from the Qur'an. It was by analyzing the syntactic structure of the Qur'an that the Arabic root system was developed. This system was first attested to in Kitab Al-Ayin, the first intralanguage dictionary of its kind, which preceded the Oxford English dictionary by 800 years. It was through this development that the concept of Arabic roots was established and later co-opted into the term 'semitic root,' allowing the decipherment of ancient scripts. In essence, they quite literally copied and pasted the entirety of the Arabic root. Hebrew had been dead, as well as all the other dialects of Arabic, until being 'revived' in a Frankensteinian fashion in the 18th and 19th centuries. The entire region spoke basically the same language, with mumbled dialect continuums spread about, and Arabic is the oldest form from which all these dialects branched off. As time passed, the language gradually became more degenerate, and then the Qur'an appeared with the oldest possible form of the language thousands of years later. This is why the Arabs of that time were challenged to produce 10 similar verses, and they couldn't. People think it's a miracle because they couldn't do it, but I think the miracle is the language itself. They had never spoken Arabic, nor has any other language before or since had this mathematical precision. And when I say mathematical, I quite literally mean mathematical. Now how is it that the Qur'an came thousands of years later in an alphabet that had never been recorded before, and in the highest form the language had ever taken? The creator is neither bound by time nor space, therefore the names are uttered as they truly were, in a language that is lexically, syntactically, phonemically, and semantically older than the oldest recorded writing. In fact, that writing appears to have been a simplified version of it. Not only that, but it would be the equivalent of the greatest works of any particular language all appearing in one book, in a perfect script and in the highest form the language could ever take. It is so high in fact, that it had yet to be surpassed despite the fact that over the last millennium the collection of Arabic manuscripts when compared on word-per-word basis in Western Museums alone, when they are compared with the collected Greek and Latin manuscripts combined, the latter does not constitute 1 percent of the former as per German professor Frank Griffel, in addition all in a script that had never been recorded before. Thus, the enlightenment of mankind from barbarism and savagery began, and the age of reason and rationality was born from its study.real
@@zakirhossainkhan-ke9dd the quran is quite literally revised (aka copied) from the Bible, there are so many references that u can guarantee are copied. Also why would your god deceive billions into believing into "corrupted text" for 600 years?
Why? Whether she was 6, 9, or 16 y.o doesn't matter. She was a special person marrying another special person. It was a legal marriage. It's not a shameful event now, and not a shameful event back then, not even the Kafir Quraisy criticize/make fun of the marriage.
@@AsdfgKuy If by legal you mean lawful, then your statemen is wrong. Legal marriage exist even back then. And the prophet's marriage was legal. There's witnesses, bride price, guardian of the bride and groom, etc.
“We judge Muhammad by his words but never by his actions . If you look at what he did to other Christian’s , pagans and Jews and even women you wouldn’t call him a prophet but a war criminal “ - Geert wilders
Oh well it’s been a huge controversy for a few millenniums already. That’s why the Middle East has a holy war every decade or so and always has 🤷♂️. OP isn’t causing controversy
You are a liar, you are just throwing words here and there, you are not approaching the Quran with analytical mind, you are not garbing the text itself and scrutinize it, and you are using the bible which itself is not a source of authority because it is corrupted and people change it
The Aramaic word for God is "Alaha". It's the word Isa PBUH used. Sounds familiar? Written without the confusing vowels it is written A-L-H ܐ ܠܗܐ (alap-lamed-he) as found in Targum or in Tanakh (Daniel, Ezra), Syriac Aramaic (Peshitta), reduced from the Arabic original (of which Aramaic is a dialect continuum as will be explained) it is written in the Arabic script 'A-L-L-H' (Aleph-Lam-Lam-Ha) add an A before the last H for vocalization. The word God in another rendition in Hebrew ʾĕlōah is derived from a base ʾilāh, an Arabic word, written without confusing vowel it is A-L-H in the Arabic script, pronounced ilah not eloah. Hebrew dropped the glottal stop and mumbled it, aramic mumbled a little less and it became elaha. Infact both are written written A-L-H in Arabic, it is pronounced i in Arabic and not A because it is an Alef with hamza below (إ أ ) They are two different forms of Alef. And it mean "a god", it is the non definitive form of A-L-L-H, in which the Alef is without a glottal stop/hamza,(ا), but this kind of nuance is lost in the dialect continua. infact "YHWH" itself is an Arabic word as discussed by Professor. Israel Knohl (Professor of Biblical studies at the Hebrew University of Jerusalem) in the paper" YHWH: The Original Arabic Meaning of the Name." jesus as his name is often misspelled due to the lack of the ayin sound in Greek, which was rendered to Iesous, coupling the nearest sound to ayin, same letter found in 'Iraq', which sounds entirely different in Arabic form 'Iran' in Arabic, with the -ous Greek suffix that Greeks typically add to their names 'HerodotOS', 'PlotinUS', 'AchelOUS' and later mumbled into a J. The yeshua rendition of Isa (his name in the Qur'an) PBUH which is purported to be the name of Jesus is KNOWN to had been taken from greek. Western Syriac also use "Isho". Western Aramaic (separate from Syriac which is a dialect of Eastern Aramaic) use "Yeshu". Western Syriac has been separate from Western Aramaic for about 1000 years. And sounds don't even match up. Syriac is a Christian liturgical language yet the four letters of the name of Jesus «ܝܫܘܥ» [ = Judeo-Babylonian Aramaic: «ישוע» ] sounds totally different in West vs East Syriac, viz. vocalized akin to Christian Arabic, Hebrew, Aramaic «ܝܶܫܽܘܥ» (Yēšūʿ) in West Syriac, but pronounced more akin to Muslim Arabic Quran character name Isa in East Syriac «ܝܑܼܫܘܿܥ» (ʾĪšōʿ). The reason for this confusion is their dropping of phonemes. Only someone that has no idea what the letters are or how they sound would have a name ending in a pharyngeal fricative like the ayin, if it were to be used in a name it would have had to be in the beginning, thus the Arabic rendition is the correct one. An example in English is how the appended -d is a common error amongst the English pronouncing Gaelic names. The name Donald arose from a common English mispronunciation of the Gaelic name Donal. Just how it is with donal becoming donald and the two becoming distinct and the original being regarded as something seperate so too did Isa PBUH turn to Iesous turn to jesus and when they tried going back to the original they confused it for yeshua ( ysu is how it is actually written) for Isa PBUH ( 3'eysah ) Schlözer in his preparation for the Arabia expedition in 1781 coined the term Semitic language: "From the Mediterranean to the Euphrates, from Mesopotamia to Arabia ruled one language, as is well known. Thus Syrians, Babylonians, Hebrews, and Arabs were one people (ein Volk). Phoenicians (Hamites) also spoke this language, which I would like to call the Semitic (die Semitische)." -Before Boas: The Genesis of Ethnography and Ethnology in the German By Han F. Vermeulen. He was only half right though, Arabic is the only corollary to "proto-semitic", infact the whole semitic classification is nonsensical as will be shown. "protosemetic" Alphabet (28), Arabic Alphabet (28), Latin transliteration, hebrew (22) 𐩠 𐩡 𐩢 𐩣 𐩤 𐩥 𐩦 𐩧 𐩨 𐩩 𐩪 𐩫 𐩬 𐩭 𐩮 𐩰 𐩱 𐩲 𐩳 𐩴 𐩵 𐩶 𐩷 𐩸 𐩹 𐩺 𐩻 𐩼 ا ب ت ث ج ح خ د ذ ر ز س ش ص ض ط ظ ع غ ف ق ك ل م ن ه و ي A b t ṯ j h kh d ḏ r z s sh ṣ ḍ ṭ ẓ ʿ ġ f q k l m n h w y א ב ג ד ה ו ז ח ט י כ ל מ נ ס ע פ צ ק ר ש ת Merged phonemes in hebrew and aramaic: ح, خ (h, kh) merged into only kh consonant remain س, ش (s, sh) merged into only Shin consonant remaining ط, ظ (ṭ/teth, ẓ) merged into only ṭ/teth consonant remaining ص, ض (ṣ, ḍ/Tsad ) merged into only ḍ/Tsad consonant remaining ع, غ (3'ayn, Ghayn) merged into a reducted ayin consonant remaining ت, ث (t/taw, th) merged into only t/taw consonant remaining The reason why the protoS alphabet here is 28 and not 29, is because the supposed extra letter is simply a س written in a different position, but it was shoehorned to obfuscated. In Arabic letter shapes are different depending on whether they are in the beginning , middle or end of a word. No such thing as the bible, the new testament is a concoction of several books that were deemed canonical, books written in Greek that were given the hellenized names of Apotsles who neither wrote, nor spoke greek to give it an illusion of antiquity, much like the calendar we have today, which was established in the year 535 CE by Dionysus Exegesis so too was the original message altered to that of the pauline credo, a digestible religion to the yet to be converted greeks who had no desire to follow the mosaic laws. None of the disciples spoke of trinity, ate pork or proclaimed it is allowable to do so, yet the miracle begotten paul, whom peter called him enemy, introduced his new creed according to his whims, often boastful of his innovations he said " I was not a whit behind the very chiefest apostles." There is no passage in Paul inconsistent with these quotations; no passage suggesting that the admission of the gentiles into the Christian church was an idea of Jesus, or that it was accepted by the twelve apostles in Jerusalem before the conversion of Paul, or that he received any instruction from them or acknowledged any duty of obedience or submission to them. This gospel which Paul preached and which, according to his boast, was original with him, included many tenets not found in the four gospels or not set forth there in unmistakable terms. By implication, it repudiated the ascetic and communistic maxims of the synoptic gospels, It proclaimed the abrogation of the Mosaic ceremonial law. It proclaimed that the unsearchable riches of Christ were to be distributed as freely among the Gentiles as among the Jews. It announced itself as a new and independent religion; and popular speech recognized the correctness of the claim by calling its adherents Christians, and their doctrine Christianity. Language; When one looks at the actual linguistics, one will find that many were puzzled by the opposite, that is, how the other "semetic" languages were more "evolved" than Arabic, while Arabic had archaic features, not only archaic compared to bibilical Hebrew, Ethiopic, "Aramaic" contemporary "semetic" languages, but even archaic compared to languages from ancient antiquity; Ugaritic, Akkadain. What is meant here by Archaic is not what most readers think, it is Archaic not in the sense that it is simple, but rather that it is complex (think Latin to pig Latin or Italian or Old English, which had genders and case endings to modern English), not only grammatically, but also phonetically; All the so called semitic languages are supposed to have evolved from protosemetic, the Alphabet for protosemitic is that of the so called Ancient South Arabian (which interestingly corresponds with the traditional Arabic origins account) and has 28 Phonemes. Arabic has 28 phonemes. Hebrew has 22, same as Aramaic, and other "semitic" languages. Now pause for a second and think about it, how come Arabic, a language that is supposed to have come so late has the same number of letters as a language that supposedly predates it by over a millennium (Musnad script ~1300 BCE). Not only is the glossary of phonemes more diverse than any other semitic language, but the grammar is more complex, containing more cases and retains what's linguists noted for its antiquity, broken plurals. Indeed, a linguist has once noted that if one were to take everything we know about languages and how they develop, Arabic is older than Akkadian (~2500 BCE). Now how is it that the Qur'an came thousands of years later in an alphabet that had never been recorded before, and in the highest form the language had ever taken? The creator is neither bound by time nor space, therefore the names are uttered as they truly were, in a language that is lexically, syntactically, phonemically, and semantically older than the oldest recorded writing. In fact, that writing appears to have been a simplified version of it. Not only that, but it would be the equivalent of the greatest works of any particular language all appearing in one book, in a perfect script and in the highest form the language could ever take. It is so high in fact, that it had yet to be surpassed despite the fact that over the last millennium the collection of Arabic manuscripts when compared on word-per-word basis in Western Museums alone, when they are compared with the collected Greek and Latin manuscripts combined, the latter does not constitute 1 percent of the former as per German professor Frank Griffel, in addition all in a script that had never been recorded before. Thus, the enlightenment of mankind from barbarism and savagery began, and the age of reason and rationality was born from its study. God did bring down the Qur’an, Mohamed is his Messenger.
I'm an atheist, but having read through the entire bible the dude who said that the word "chiristian" isnt found in the bible in simply wrong. It appear in two different new testament books; Acts and 1 Peter.
@@user-nk8lp4ng8r You're not even talking about the same thing that I am. I said that the word Christian appears in the Bible, which it does. I never once tried to define the word Christian, so whatever you are angry about is completely unrelated to what I said.
The Danish scholar Patricia Crone wanted to write a book on Meccan trade leading up to the beginning of Islam, since Islam describes Mecca as a major trade route hub, the oldest place of human habitation on earth. She ran into a problem, namely, there is no evidence that Mecca existed until after Mohammed would have died. No trade documents, it's not on any maps until centuries after Islam is supposed to begun, it's not on any trade route. The place is more of a hole-in-the-wall, a robbers roost, a hiding place in the middle of nowhere.
We have no archaeological proof of Moses existence, and if he did exist we have no proof of when that might have been. The only books that speak of Moses are the books of the Jews (then the books of the Christians and Muslims of course) and were written a long time after his supposed lifetime. Yet other local cultures, who generally liked to write and leave traces, have never spoken of a guy who led 2 million people across the sea and the desert. In fact, to go a step further, archaeology would tend to go against most of the information that's told about Moses, since it's often anacronistic, inaccurate or inconsistent with one another. I guess all Abrahamic religions are false since archaeology can't prove the existence of the original prophet, right?
Nice fantasy , The name of Mecca is often claimed to be first recorded by the Greek geographer Ptolemy, who calls it Macoraba in the 2nd century AD. However, this identification is not certain, and some scholars have argued that there are older accounts of Mecca than Ptolemy. For example, some have suggested that Mecca is mentioned in the Assyrian inscriptions of Tiglath-Pileser III (8th century BC) as Magan or Makan, a region ruled by the Arab queen Samsi. Others have proposed that Mecca is referred to in the Old Testament as Paran or Teman, places associated with Ishmael and his descendants. Still others have pointed out that Mecca is attested in some ancient South Arabian inscriptions as Makkah or Makkahum, meaning "temple" or "sanctuary". One inscription from the 3rd century AD reads: "By ʿAthtar of Makkahum and by Almaqah of ʿAwwām and by Dhat-Ḥimyam and by Dhu-Samawi and by Dhat-Baʿdan. I am ʿAbd-Karib son of ʿAbd-Malik son of ʿAbd-Karib son of ʿAbd-Malik son of ʿAbd-Karib son of ʿAbd-Malik son of ʿAbd-Karib son of ʿAbd-Malik son of ʿAbd-Karib son of ʿAbd-Malik son of ʿAbd-Karib son of ʿAbd-Malik son of Ḥaṭṭab. I have made a vow to Makkahum for my life and for my children and for my clan." This inscription shows that Mecca was a place where people made vows and sought blessings from various gods. Another inscription from the 4th century AD reads: "By Almaqah the lord and by Dhat-Ḥimyam and by Dhu-Samawi and by Dhat-Baʿdan. I am Ḥaṭṭab son of Ḥaṭṭab son of Ḥaṭṭab son of Ḥaṭṭab son of Ḥaṭṭab son of Ḥaṭṭab son of Ḥaṭṭab son of Ḥaṭṭab son of Ḥaṭṭab. I have given to Makkahum a gift: two camels with their saddles." This inscription shows that Mecca was a place where people gave gifts and donations to the temple. These inscriptions confirm that Mecca was a well-known and respected city in ancient South Arabia, and that its location was in the same valley surrounded by mountains as it is today.
Greek has a limited ability of capturing Arabic it is infact Markorava (Μακόραβα) and not Macroba as is often localized Greek is known to morph to suit tongue of speakers, the word for Jesus as his name is often misspelled due to the lack of the ayin sound in Greek, which was rendered to Iesous, coupling the nearest sound to ayin, same letter found in 'Iraq', which sounds entirely different in Arabic form 'Iran' in Arabic, with the -ous Greek suffix that Greeks typically add to their names 'HerodotOS', 'PlotinUS', 'AchelOUS' and later mumbled into a J. The original is "Isa" as it is in the Quran Arabic. The yeshua rendition of Isa (his name in the Qur'an) PBUH which is purported to be the name of Jesus is KNOWN to had been taken from greek. Western Syriac also use "Isho". Western Aramaic (separate from Syriac which is a dialect of Eastern Aramaic) use "Yeshu". Western Syriac has been separate from Western Aramaic for about 1000 years. And sounds don't even match up. Syriac is a Christian liturgical language yet the four letters of the name of Jesus «ܝܫܘܥ» [ = Judeo-Babylonian Aramaic: «ישוע» ] sounds totally different in West vs East Syriac, viz. vocalized akin to Christian Arabic, Hebrew, Aramaic «ܝܶܫܽܘܥ» (Yēšūʿ) in West Syriac, but pronounced more akin to Muslim Arabic Quran character name Isa in East Syriac «ܝܑܼܫܘܿܥ» (ʾĪšōʿ). The reason for this confusion is their dropping of phonemes as aforementioned. Only someone that has no idea what the letters are or how they sound would have a name ending in a pharyngeal fricative like the ayin, if it were to be used in a name it would have had to be in the beginning, thus the Arabic rendition is the correct one. In addition, The word God in hebrew is eloah, is a cognate of the Arabic I-L-H, pronounced ilah not eloah. Hebrew dropped the glottal stop and mumbled it into eloh, aramic mumbled a little less and it became elah. Infact it is written A-L-H in Arabic, it is pronounced i in Arabic cause it is an Alef with hamza below (إ أ ) They are two different forms of Alef. And it mean "a god", it is the non definitive form of A-L-L-H, in which the Alef is without a glottal stop/hamza,(ا) Schlözer in his preparation for the Arabia expedition in 1781 coined the term Semitic language: "From the Mediterranean to the Euphrates, from Mesopotamia to Arabia ruled one language, as is well known. Thus Syrians, Babylonians, Hebrews, and Arabs were one people (ein Volk). Phoenicians (Hamites) also spoke this language, which I would like to call the Semitic (die Semitische)." -Before Boas: The Genesis of Ethnography and Ethnology in the German By Han F. Vermeulen He was only half right though, Arabic is the only corollary to "proto-semitic", infact the whole semitic classification is nonsensical for anyone with a somewhat functioning mass between their ears. hebrew, aramaic, rest of madeup dialect continua only have 22 letters of the 29 protosemitic letters Arabic has all 29. The difference betweeen Arabic and the other creoles and Pidgin is the same as that between Latin and pig latin or italian. "protosemetic" Alphabet (29), Arabic Alphabet (28), Latin transliteration, hebrew (22) 𐩠 𐩡 𐩢 𐩣 𐩤 𐩥 𐩦 𐩧 𐩨 𐩩 𐩪 𐩫 𐩬 𐩭 𐩮 𐩰 𐩱 𐩲 𐩳 𐩴 𐩵 𐩶 𐩷 𐩸 𐩹 𐩺 𐩻 𐩼 ا ب ت ث ج ح خ د ذ ر ز س ش ص ض ط ظ ع غ ف ق ك ل م ن ه و ي A b t ṯ j h kh d ḏ r z s sh ṣ ḍ ṭ ẓ ʿ ġ f q k l m n h w y א ב ג ד ה ו ז ח ט י כ ל מ נ ס ע פ צ ק ר ש ת Merged phonemes in hebrew and aramaic: ح, خ (h, kh) merged into only kh consonant remain س, ش (s, sh) merged into only Shin consonant remaining ط, ظ (ṭ/teth, ẓ) merged into only ṭ/teth consonant remaining ص, ض (ṣ, ḍ/Tsad ) merged into only ḍ/Tsad consonant remaining ع, غ (3'ayn, Ghayn) merged into a reducted ayin consonant remaining ت, ث (t/taw, th) merged into only t/taw consonant remaining This kind of nuance is lost in the dialect continua. As a matter of fact, all of the knowledge needed for deciphering ancient texts and their complexity was derived from the Qur'an. It was by analyzing the syntactic structure of the Qur'an that the Arabic root system was developed. This system was first attested to in Kitab Al-Ayin, the first intralanguage dictionary of its kind, which preceded the Oxford English dictionary by 800 years. It was through this development that the concept of Arabic roots was established and later co-opted into the term 'semitic root,' allowing the decipherment of ancient scripts. In essence, they quite literally copied and pasted the entirety of the Arabic root. Hebrew had been dead, as well as all the other dialects of Arabic, until being 'revived' in a Frankensteinian fashion in the 18th and 19th centuries. The entire region spoke basically the same language, with mumbled dialect continuums spread about, and Arabic is the oldest form from which all these dialects branched off. As time passed, the language gradually became more degenerate, and then the Qur'an appeared with the oldest possible form of the language thousands of years later. This is why the Arabs of that time were challenged to produce 10 similar verses, and they couldn't. People think it's a miracle because they couldn't do it, but I think the miracle is the language itself. They had never spoken Arabic, nor has any other language before or since had this mathematical precision. And when I say mathematical, I quite literally mean mathematical. |Classical Arabic | 28 consonants, 29 with Hamza and 6 vowels; some consonants are emphatic or pharyngealized; some vowels are marked with diacritics | Complex system of word formation based on roots and patterns; roots are sequences of consonants that carry the basic meaning of a word; patterns are sequences of vowels and affixes that modify the meaning and function of a word | Flexible word order, but VSO is most common; SVO is also possible; subject and object are marked by case endings (-u for nominative, -a for accusative, -i for genitive); verb agrees with subject in person, number, and gender; verb has different forms for different moods and aspects | | Akkadian | 22 consonants and 3 vowels; some consonants are glottalized or palatalized; vowels are not marked | Similar system, but with different roots and patterns; some roots have more than three consonants; some patterns have infixes or reduplication | Fixed word order of SVO; subject and object are not marked by case endings, but by prepositions or word order; verb agrees with subject in person, number, and gender; verb has different forms for different tenses and aspects | | Aramaic | 22 consonants and 3 vowels (later variants have more); no emphatic or pharyngealized consonants (except in some dialects); vowels are not marked (except in later variants such as Syriac) | Simple system of word formation based on prefixes and suffixes; some roots or patterns exist, but are less productive than in Arabic or Akkadian | Classical Arabic has more consonants and vowels than other semitic languages, and that it preserves some sounds that were lost or changed in other semitic languages. This means that classical Arabic can encode more information in a given unit of speech than other semitic languages, and that it is closer to the original sound system of protosemitic., we can see that classical Arabic has more grammatical features than the other languages, such as case endings, mood endings, and root and pattern system. These features make classical Arabic more expressive and precise than the other languages, as it can convey more information and nuances in a single word or phrase. Classical Arabic is also more flexible than the other languages, as it can use different word orders and verb forms to emphasize different aspects of the sentence. Classical Arabic is therefore older and more original than the other languages, it is the language of Adam. Now how is it that the Qur'an came thousands of years later in an alphabet that had never been recorded before, and in the highest form the language had ever taken? The creator is neither bound by time nor space, therefore the names are uttered as they truly were, in a language that is lexically, syntactically, phonemically, and semantically older than the oldest recorded writing. In fact, that writing appears to have been a simplified version of it. Not only that, but it would be the equivalent of the greatest works of any particular language all appearing in one book, in a perfect script and in the highest form the language could ever take. It is so high in fact, that it had yet to be surpassed despite the fact that over the last millennium the collection of Arabic manuscripts when compared on word-per-word basis in Western Museums alone, when they are compared with the collected Greek and Latin manuscripts combined, the latter does not constitute 1 percent of the former as per German professor Frank Griffel, in addition all in a script that had never been recorded before. Thus, the enlightenment of mankind from barbarism and savagery began, and the age of reason and rationality was born from its study.
To show the relation between Arabic and other "semitic" language, another Aramaic word for God is Alaha . Sounds familiar? Written without the confusing vowels, it is A-L-H ܐ ܠܗܐ (alap-lamed-he) as found in Targum or in Tanakh (Daniel, Ezra), Syriac Aramaic (Peshitta), reducted from the Arabic original (of which Aramaic is a dialect continuum) 'A-L-L-H' (Aleph-Lam-Lam-Ha). Add another A before the H for vocalization. To illustrate, Let's start with a simple sentence: ## The house is big Arabic: البيتُ كبيرٌ al-bayt-u kabīr-un Proto-Semitic: *ʔal-bayt-u kabīr-u Hebrew: הבית גדול ha-bayit gadol Akkadian: bītum rabûm Amharic: ቤቱ ገደሉ betu gedelu As can be seen, Arabic and Proto-Semitic have the same word order (noun-adjective), the same definite article (al-), and the same case endings (-u for nominative). Hebrew and Akkadian have lost the case endings and changed the definite article (ha- and -um respectively). Amharic has changed the word order (adjective-noun) and the definite article (u-). But Arabic is not only similar to Proto-Semitic, it is also pre-Semitic, meaning that it is the original form of Semitic before it split into different branches. This is because Arabic preserves many features that are not found in any other Semitic language, but are found in other Afro-Asiatic languages, such as Egyptian and Berber. These features include: - The definite article al-, which is derived from the demonstrative pronoun *ʔal- 'that'. This article is unique to Arabic among Semitic languages, but it is similar to the article n- in Berber and the article p-, t-, n- in Egyptian. - The dual number for nouns and verbs, which is marked by the suffix -ān or -ayn. This number is rare in other Semitic languages, but it is common in other Afro-Asiatic languages, such as Egyptian and Berber. - The imperfective prefix t- for verbs, which indicates the second person singular feminine or third person plural feminine. This prefix is unique to Arabic among Semitic languages, but it is similar to the prefix t- in Berber and Egyptian. - The passive voice for verbs, which is marked by the infix t between the first and second root consonants. This voice is unique to Arabic among Semitic languages, but it is similar to the passive voice in Egyptian and Berber. Finally, a more complex sentence: The letter was written with a pen. Arabic: كُتِبَتِ الرِّسَالَةُ بِالقَلَمِ kutiba-t al-risāla-t-u bi-l-qalam-i Proto-Semitic: *kutiba-t ʔal-risāla-t-u bi-l-qalam-i Hebrew: המכתב נכתב בעט ha-michtav niktav ba-et Akkadian: šipram šapāru bēlum Egyptian: sḏm.n.f p-ẖry m rnp.t Berber: tturra-t tibratin s uccen Here, Arabic and Proto-Semitic have the same word order (verb-subject-object), the same passive voice marker (-t-), the same definite article (al-), and the same preposition (bi-). Hebrew has changed the word order (subject-verb-object), lost the passive voice marker, changed the definite article (ha-) and the preposition (ba-). Akkadian has changed the word order (object-subject-verb), lost the passive voice marker, changed the definite article (-um) and the preposition (bēlum). Language; When you look at the actual linguistics, you'll find that many were puzzled by the opposite, that is, how the other "semetic" (why in quotes will be revealed later) languages were more "evolved" than Arabic, while Arabic had archaic features, not only archaic compared to bibilical Hebrew, Ethiopic, "Aramaic" contemporary "semetic" languages, but even archaic compared to languages from ancient antiquity; Ugaritic, Akkadain. What is meant here by Archaic is not what most readers think, it is Archaic not in the sense that it is simple, but rather that it is complex (think Latin to pig Latin or Italian or Old English, which had genders and case endings to modern English), not only grammatically, but also phonetically; All the so called semitic languages are supposed to have evolved from protosemetic, the Alphabet for protosemitic is that of the so called Ancient South Arabian (which interestingly corresponds with the traditional Arabic origins account) and has 28 Phonemes. Arabic has 28 phonemes. Hebrew has 22, same as Aramaic, and other "semitic" languages. Now pause for a second and think about it, how come Arabic, a language that is supposed to have come so late has the same number of letters as a language that supposedly predates it by over a millennium (Musnad script ~1300 BCE). Not only is the glossary of phonemes more diverse than any other semitic language, but the grammar is more complex, containing more cases and retains what's linguists noted for its antiquity, broken plurals. Indeed, a linguist has once noted that if one were to take everything we know about languages and how they develop, Arabic is older than Akkadian (~2500 BCE). Now how is it that the Qur'an came thousands of years in a language that is lexically, syntactically, phonemically, and semantically older than the oldest recorded writing? God did bring down the Qur’an, Mohamed is his Messenger.
The story is simple, really, if you look at it. Jesus was tempted in the desert by Lucifer, and he rebuked him. Then later on, Muhammad was tempted by Lucifer.And they made a deal.
@@hiraplay612 550 years after Christ. Also the original manuscripts on hide were altered multiple times. By the Qurans definition, that makes it fraudulent and invalid.
Jesus is Muslim because he submitted to god. The definition of a Muslim is one who submits to god. Let me correct this a little bit because some people are confused. The word “Islam” means “submission to the will of God.” Followers of Islam are called Muslims. Muslims are monotheistic and worship one, all-knowing God, who in Arabic is known as Allah. Followers of Islam aim to live a life of complete submission to Allah. Jesus was a muslim because he submitted to the one true god, the father. He wasn’t a god, the holy spirit wasn’t a god. That’s what we muslims believe. Like all prophets in Islam, Jesus is also called a Muslim, as he preached that his followers should adopt the 'straight path' (Ṣirāṭ al-Mustaqīm). Jesus is attributed with a vast number of miracles in Islamic tradition.
@@Phantom.est.2006it's no use man everytime I talk with a Christian they don't even come up with REAL arguments and all they say Mohammed pbuh married Aesha when she was 6 years old ;-;
@@begobolehsjwjangan2359 No, it'll be Islam, Christianity, and the followers of the anti-Christ. We actually believe some Christians (not all) will be on the good guy side. But when Jesus returns the Christians will become Muslim.
@@begobolehsjwjangan2359Which means Islam by itself can’t stand so had to use kafir arguments to try and debunk Christianity which in turn just as well debunks their entire religion since in their own book, it relies on the Bible for its authenticity of passing down this “continuity” of prophecy (Sura 5.66, 5.68 as blatant examples). It is easy to see the fraud Muhammad was.
Bro y'all should know this, dr zakir stated in muhammad in hinduism scripture video that muhammad is muhammadi from vhabisya purana that totally a demon being who get incarnate to create a demonic religion in this world, LIKE HE SHOULD GO TO JAIL FOR ISLAMOPHOBIA, BRO ADMITED HIS OWN RELIGION IS DEMONIC LIKE HOW? 😂
I love how this guy literally uses legitimate sources, even their fkn own sources like quran and hadith, compares and shows just plain stupidity it just flies over muslims head. Like wtf is wrong with them? They always do this for example their own source Bukhari says Aysha was 6 and they go like "no, she was actually 19 🤓👆" without ever proving how she was 19 lmaooo
She was. My “French” grandmother (who was a Christian at that time) married my grandfather when she was 9, this was less than a 100 years ago… what’s your point bud? The prophet pbuh married women of different ages (one was older than him, and one was his age) he didn’t only marry “kids” PLEASE get educated before throwing your bs. It’s so sad how HARD you people try
I almost converted to Islam once upon a time. I was disenchanted with Protestant Christianity (being raised as a not particularly devout AME (African Methodist Episcopal)) and the hollowness and logical inconsistencies of atheism, especially the edge lord anti-thiestic atheism of the early-mid 2000s during my teenage years. I was fortunate enough to go to a good high-school with a diverse student body, and one of my best friends in high school was a Sunni Muslim with family from Egypt. We used to get in all sorts of discussions about all kinds of topics, and he and his family impressed me with his intelligence, manners and hospitality. There were these two Muslim twins I used to hang out with back then too and they were REALLY smart, easily a few grade levels above the average class at the time. Their families were from Pakistan, I think. Later when I went to university, my politics were moving towards a more anarcho-syndicalism libertarian leftism, and I met up with students who were anti-Zionist, and many of them were Muslim, so I became pals with some of them. I bought a Quran and Hadith and started reading, as I was all over the place at the time. I was doing yoga and kundalini exercises regularly and reading Hindu and Buddhist sutras, existentialist philosophy, Zen Buddhist treatises, etc. I didn't commit to Islam at the time, because I was still deeply skeptical of explicit religious claims. Long story short (were talking 10-15 years now), after going to two Buddhist silent meditation retreats and watching our world crumble before my eyes, slowly but surely I'm coming to realize the sheer importance and magnificence of Christ and the the church that immediately followed his earthly sojourn. I have friends and acquaintances today who are Muslim, Zen Buddhist, Hindu, Jewish, etc., but these systems and philosophies don't seem to compare to Christ and what he left for the world. (Oh and the fact that my father (RIP/Memory Eternal) was a member of the NATION OF ISLAM back in the day, but that's a whole other story.)
Me too, I thought that Islam is nice and almost wanted to convert because of the lies of Muslim people on tiktok saying that Islam destroyed racism without mentioning the slave trade that was continued in Islamic nations even after 1800
Buddha soothes me and Jesus comforts me. I find both infinitely glorious and complementary, Buddha is man who becomes God and Jesus is God who becomes man. They both follow parallel paths, with Buddha one attains love through wisdom, with Jesus one attains wisdom through love. They are the 2 lights of the world, the 2 paths that lead to the foot of the sun.
@@Maitatron I'm sorry but you can't serve two masters, either you will hate one and loved the other. Any religion that you can lie to yourself into thinking that you can be pious enough that God will owe you something can not be the true path to God. Jesus is the King that goes infront of His troops as all others makes you fight on the frontline.
Went to my first ever Divine Liturgy with my family on Christmas. My parents are devout Catholics and I have told them about my desire to switch to Orthodoxy and thankfully they have been very supportive since they know that Orthodoxy was there since the beginning and has valid apostolic succession like RC does. My family and I really enjoyed the experience at the church, even if the church itself was pretty tiny and not as intricate, organized, or decorated as the larger, more popular churches. The incense was amazing and a brand new scent for us, the singing of the majority of what was said was amazing and the priest gave an amazing sermon that made my dad tear up. I am now set on my decision to switch to Orthodoxy, but unfortunately i don’t believe it will happen anytime soon until sometime in the future since the nearest Orthodox Church is an hour away and I work on Sundays and have school on weekdays in another city. Thank you Kyle for all your information and help and God bless! ☦️
Glad to hear you found the try church. But remember my brother just a small correction on what you said. RC does not have valid succession like us. They are cut off from God and are no longer part of the apostolic succession.
@@matheussalim5652 for me, it’s the issue of a pope being infallible and supreme over all other bishops, especially when it’s a bad one like pope Francis, the resurrection sculpture in the Vatican audience hall, the need for a tradcath movement since some of the past few popes and the Vatican 2 council have actively been trying to destroy and replace the traditional Latin mass with clown masses and whatnot, all the innovations and additions Rome added without conversing with the other 4 churches, and romes arrogance in trying to assert control over the others, and most importantly the sack of Constantinople done by Catholic crusaders against the Orthodox empire, the only empire holding back the muslim forces from expanding into most of the Middle East, that make me want to switch to Orthodoxy
Verses from the Old Testament 1. Isaiah 9:6: • “For to us a child is born, to us a son is given, and the government will be on his shoulders. And he will be called Wonderful Counselor, Mighty God, Everlasting Father, Prince of Peace.” • Explanation: This verse is a prophecy about the coming Messiah, who Christians believe is Jesus. The titles “Mighty God” and “Everlasting Father” point to the divine nature of this child, suggesting that the Messiah would not be a mere human but God incarnate. 2. Micah 5:2: • “But you, Bethlehem Ephrathah, though you are small among the clans of Judah, out of you will come for me one who will be ruler over Israel, whose origins are from of old, from ancient times.” • Explanation: This verse is another prophecy about the Messiah, who is described as having origins “from of old, from ancient times,” which many Christians interpret as an indication of the eternal nature of the Messiah, pointing to His divinity. Verses from the New Testament 1. John 1:1-3, 14: • “In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God. He was with God in the beginning. Through him all things were made; without him nothing was made that has been made. … The Word became flesh and made his dwelling among us. We have seen his glory, the glory of the one and only Son, who came from the Father, full of grace and truth.” • Explanation: These verses clearly identify Jesus (referred to as “the Word”) as God and the Creator. Verse 14 confirms that this Word became flesh, identifying Jesus as God incarnate. 2. John 8:58: • “Very truly I tell you,” Jesus answered, “before Abraham was born, I am!” • Explanation: Here, Jesus uses the divine name “I am” (Greek: ego eimi), which directly echoes God’s self-identification in Exodus 3:14 (“I AM WHO I AM”). This statement was understood by His contemporaries as a claim to divinity, which is why they attempted to stone Him for blasphemy immediately after this statement (John 8:59). 3. Colossians 2:9: • “For in Christ all the fullness of the Deity lives in bodily form,” • Explanation: This verse explicitly states that Jesus possesses the fullness of the divine nature, affirming His identity as God. 4. Titus 2:13: • “while we wait for the blessed hope-the appearing of the glory of our great God and Savior, Jesus Christ,” • Explanation: Paul refers to Jesus as “our great God and Savior,” a clear declaration of His divinity. Common Muslim Arguments Against the Divinity of Jesus Muslims generally reject the divinity of Jesus, and they base their arguments on several points: 1. Jesus’ Humanity and Servanthood: • Muslims often point to verses in the Bible where Jesus is depicted as a man who eats, sleeps, and prays, such as Luke 2:52, where Jesus grows in wisdom and stature, and John 14:28, where Jesus says, “The Father is greater than I.” These verses emphasize Jesus’ human nature and His role as a servant of God. 2. The Shema and Monotheism: • Muslims argue that the Shema, a central declaration of Jewish faith found in Deuteronomy 6:4 (“Hear, O Israel: The Lord our God, the Lord is one.”), emphasizes the oneness of God. They believe that the concept of the Trinity contradicts this fundamental monotheism, interpreting it as polytheism. 3. Prophethood of Jesus: • In Islam, Jesus (Isa in Arabic) is regarded as one of the greatest prophets, but not divine. The Qur’an teaches that Jesus was a human prophet who performed miracles by God’s permission but never claimed divinity. Muslims often cite verses like John 17:3, where Jesus refers to the Father as the “only true God,” as evidence that Jesus Himself did not consider Himself God. 4. Jesus’ Knowledge and Power: • Muslims highlight verses where Jesus appears to have limited knowledge (e.g., Mark 13:32, where Jesus says He does not know the hour of the end times) or where He prays to God (e.g., Matthew 26:39). These instances are interpreted as evidence that Jesus was subordinate to God and therefore not divine. Christian Responses to These Arguments 1. Hypostatic Union: • Christians believe in the hypostatic union, which teaches that Jesus is fully God and fully man. This means that while Jesus has a human nature with its limitations, He also possesses a divine nature. Therefore, when Jesus prays or expresses limited knowledge, He is doing so in His humanity, not His divinity. 2. Trinity as Unity: • The Christian doctrine of the Trinity maintains that God is one in essence but exists in three persons: Father, Son, and Holy Spirit. The Shema’s declaration of God’s oneness is not seen as contradictory to the Trinity, but rather it underscores the unity of God’s being. 3. Jesus’ Statements of Divinity: • Christians point out that Jesus made several claims to divinity, such as in John 10:30 (“I and the Father are one”) and through His miracles and authority over life and death (e.g., John 11:25-26). These affirmations are seen as consistent with the understanding that Jesus is God. @@Zidane-is-the-GOAT05
@@rafiramzihenkaja3251 Verses from the Old Testament 1. Isaiah 9:6: • “For to us a child is born, to us a son is given, and the government will be on his shoulders. And he will be called Wonderful Counselor, Mighty God, Everlasting Father, Prince of Peace.” • Explanation: This verse is a prophecy about the coming Messiah, who Christians believe is Jesus. The titles “Mighty God” and “Everlasting Father” point to the divine nature of this child, suggesting that the Messiah would not be a mere human but God incarnate. 2. Micah 5:2: • “But you, Bethlehem Ephrathah, though you are small among the clans of Judah, out of you will come for me one who will be ruler over Israel, whose origins are from of old, from ancient times.” • Explanation: This verse is another prophecy about the Messiah, who is described as having origins “from of old, from ancient times,” which many Christians interpret as an indication of the eternal nature of the Messiah, pointing to His divinity. Verses from the New Testament 1. John 1:1-3, 14: • “In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God. He was with God in the beginning. Through him all things were made; without him nothing was made that has been made. … The Word became flesh and made his dwelling among us. We have seen his glory, the glory of the one and only Son, who came from the Father, full of grace and truth.” • Explanation: These verses clearly identify Jesus (referred to as “the Word”) as God and the Creator. Verse 14 confirms that this Word became flesh, identifying Jesus as God incarnate. 2. John 8:58: • “Very truly I tell you,” Jesus answered, “before Abraham was born, I am!” • Explanation: Here, Jesus uses the divine name “I am” (Greek: ego eimi), which directly echoes God’s self-identification in Exodus 3:14 (“I AM WHO I AM”). This statement was understood by His contemporaries as a claim to divinity, which is why they attempted to stone Him for blasphemy immediately after this statement (John 8:59). 3. Colossians 2:9: • “For in Christ all the fullness of the Deity lives in bodily form,” • Explanation: This verse explicitly states that Jesus possesses the fullness of the divine nature, affirming His identity as God. 4. Titus 2:13: • “while we wait for the blessed hope-the appearing of the glory of our great God and Savior, Jesus Christ,” • Explanation: Paul refers to Jesus as “our great God and Savior,” a clear declaration of His divinity. Common Muslim Arguments Against the Divinity of Jesus Muslims generally reject the divinity of Jesus, and they base their arguments on several points: 1. Jesus’ Humanity and Servanthood: • Muslims often point to verses in the Bible where Jesus is depicted as a man who eats, sleeps, and prays, such as Luke 2:52, where Jesus grows in wisdom and stature, and John 14:28, where Jesus says, “The Father is greater than I.” These verses emphasize Jesus’ human nature and His role as a servant of God. 2. The Shema and Monotheism: • Muslims argue that the Shema, a central declaration of Jewish faith found in Deuteronomy 6:4 (“Hear, O Israel: The Lord our God, the Lord is one.”), emphasizes the oneness of God. They believe that the concept of the Trinity contradicts this fundamental monotheism, interpreting it as polytheism. 3. Prophethood of Jesus: • In Islam, Jesus (Isa in Arabic) is regarded as one of the greatest prophets, but not divine. The Qur’an teaches that Jesus was a human prophet who performed miracles by God’s permission but never claimed divinity. Muslims often cite verses like John 17:3, where Jesus refers to the Father as the “only true God,” as evidence that Jesus Himself did not consider Himself God. 4. Jesus’ Knowledge and Power: • Muslims highlight verses where Jesus appears to have limited knowledge (e.g., Mark 13:32, where Jesus says He does not know the hour of the end times) or where He prays to God (e.g., Matthew 26:39). These instances are interpreted as evidence that Jesus was subordinate to God and therefore not divine. Christian Responses to These Arguments 1. Hypostatic Union: • Christians believe in the hypostatic union, which teaches that Jesus is fully God and fully man. This means that while Jesus has a human nature with its limitations, He also possesses a divine nature. Therefore, when Jesus prays or expresses limited knowledge, He is doing so in His humanity, not His divinity. 2. Trinity as Unity: • The Christian doctrine of the Trinity maintains that God is one in essence but exists in three persons: Father, Son, and Holy Spirit. The Shema’s declaration of God’s oneness is not seen as contradictory to the Trinity, but rather it underscores the unity of God’s being. 3. Jesus’ Statements of Divinity: • Christians point out that Jesus made several claims to divinity, such as in John 10:30 (“I and the Father are one”) and through His miracles and authority over life and death (e.g., John 11:25-26). These affirmations are seen as consistent with the understanding that Jesus is God.
20:50 I'm not an Arab Christian, but I get what you mean. It's like Arab idolatry. I've literally met Ethiopian Muslims who would deny they are black but claim to be Arab. Very strange, very strange.
In Holy Quran 2:261,And remember when Abraham said, ‘My Lord, show me how Thou givest life to the dead.’ He said, ‘Hast thou not believe?’ He said, ‘Yes, but I ask this so that my heart may be at rest.’ He answered, ‘Take four birds and make them attached to thyself. Then put each of them on a hill; then call them; they will come to thee in haste. And know that Allah is Mighty and Wise.’ Besides the afterlife, there is reference to 4 nations that shall rise and fall in ways know to Allah: 1. Nabi Musa was a Great law- bearing Prophet sent for the tribes of Israel with commandments and verities of wisdom that was suited for the Children of Israel at that stage of spiritual and physical requirements. 2. Prophet Isa (Jesus’ peace be upon Him) was the Messiah sent by God to guide the various Tribes of Israel according to the true teachings of the Torah and with the Gospel. He came about 1300 years after Prophet Musa. 3. The Holy Prophet Muhammed is the Last Great law -bearing prophet sent for the whole of mankind with blessings of spiritual guidance and signaling physical/ economic/ secular/technological blessings. 4. The Promised Messiah Nabi Ahmad was sent by God to guide people to the true teachings of the Holy Quran. In the time of the Promised Messiah there are various spiritual blessings and signaling physical/secular/economic/technological blessings. He arrived about 1300 years after the Holy Prophet.
@@chriss2452 theyre more culturally arab than they are "black" and their genes also have a lot of arab admixture due to 1,000+ years of interbreeding with arabs.
The Aramaic word for God is "Alaha". It's the word Isa PBUH used. Sounds familiar? Written without the confusing vowels it is written A-L-H ܐ ܠܗܐ (alap-lamed-he) as found in Targum or in Tanakh (Daniel, Ezra), Syriac Aramaic (Peshitta), reduced from the Arabic original (of which Aramaic is a dialect continuum as will be explained) it is written in the Arabic script 'A-L-L-H' (Aleph-Lam-Lam-Ha) add an A before the last H for vocalization. The word God in another rendition in Hebrew ʾĕlōah is derived from a base ʾilāh, an Arabic word, written without confusing vowel it is A-L-H in the Arabic script, pronounced ilah not eloah. Hebrew dropped the glottal stop and mumbled it, aramic mumbled a little less and it became elaha. Infact both are written written A-L-H in Arabic, it is pronounced i in Arabic and not A because it is an Alef with hamza below (إ أ ) They are two different forms of Alef. And it mean "a god", it is the non definitive form of A-L-L-H, in which the Alef is without a glottal stop/hamza,(ا), but this kind of nuance is lost in the dialect continua. infact "YHWH" itself is an Arabic word as discussed by Professor. Israel Knohl (Professor of Biblical studies at the Hebrew University of Jerusalem) in the paper" YHWH: The Original Arabic Meaning of the Name." jesus as his name is often misspelled due to the lack of the ayin sound in Greek, which was rendered to Iesous, coupling the nearest sound to ayin, same letter found in 'Iraq', which sounds entirely different in Arabic form 'Iran' in Arabic, with the -ous Greek suffix that Greeks typically add to their names 'HerodotOS', 'PlotinUS', 'AchelOUS' and later mumbled into a J. The yeshua rendition of Isa (his name in the Qur'an) PBUH which is purported to be the name of Jesus is KNOWN to had been taken from greek. Western Syriac also use "Isho". Western Aramaic (separate from Syriac which is a dialect of Eastern Aramaic) use "Yeshu". Western Syriac has been separate from Western Aramaic for about 1000 years. And sounds don't even match up. Syriac is a Christian liturgical language yet the four letters of the name of Jesus «ܝܫܘܥ» [ = Judeo-Babylonian Aramaic: «ישוע» ] sounds totally different in West vs East Syriac, viz. vocalized akin to Christian Arabic, Hebrew, Aramaic «ܝܶܫܽܘܥ» (Yēšūʿ) in West Syriac, but pronounced more akin to Muslim Arabic Quran character name Isa in East Syriac «ܝܑܼܫܘܿܥ» (ʾĪšōʿ). The reason for this confusion is their dropping of phonemes. Only someone that has no idea what the letters are or how they sound would have a name ending in a pharyngeal fricative like the ayin, if it were to be used in a name it would have had to be in the beginning, thus the Arabic rendition is the correct one. An example in English is how the appended -d is a common error amongst the English pronouncing Gaelic names. The name Donald arose from a common English mispronunciation of the Gaelic name Donal. Just how it is with donal becoming donald and the two becoming distinct and the original being regarded as something seperate so too did Isa PBUH turn to Iesous turn to jesus and when they tried going back to the original they confused it for yeshua ( ysu is how it is actually written) for Isa PBUH ( 3'eysah ) Schlözer in his preparation for the Arabia expedition in 1781 coined the term Semitic language: "From the Mediterranean to the Euphrates, from Mesopotamia to Arabia ruled one language, as is well known. Thus Syrians, Babylonians, Hebrews, and Arabs were one people (ein Volk). Phoenicians (Hamites) also spoke this language, which I would like to call the Semitic (die Semitische)." -Before Boas: The Genesis of Ethnography and Ethnology in the German By Han F. Vermeulen. He was only half right though, Arabic is the only corollary to "proto-semitic", infact the whole semitic classification is nonsensical as will be shown. "protosemetic" Alphabet (28), Arabic Alphabet (28), Latin transliteration, hebrew (22) 𐩠 𐩡 𐩢 𐩣 𐩤 𐩥 𐩦 𐩧 𐩨 𐩩 𐩪 𐩫 𐩬 𐩭 𐩮 𐩰 𐩱 𐩲 𐩳 𐩴 𐩵 𐩶 𐩷 𐩸 𐩹 𐩺 𐩻 𐩼 ا ب ت ث ج ح خ د ذ ر ز س ش ص ض ط ظ ع غ ف ق ك ل م ن ه و ي A b t ṯ j h kh d ḏ r z s sh ṣ ḍ ṭ ẓ ʿ ġ f q k l m n h w y א ב ג ד ה ו ז ח ט י כ ל מ נ ס ע פ צ ק ר ש ת Merged phonemes in hebrew and aramaic: ح, خ (h, kh) merged into only kh consonant remain س, ش (s, sh) merged into only Shin consonant remaining ط, ظ (ṭ/teth, ẓ) merged into only ṭ/teth consonant remaining ص, ض (ṣ, ḍ/Tsad ) merged into only ḍ/Tsad consonant remaining ع, غ (3'ayn, Ghayn) merged into a reducted ayin consonant remaining ت, ث (t/taw, th) merged into only t/taw consonant remaining The reason why the protoS alphabet here is 28 and not 29, is because the supposed extra letter is simply a س written in a different position, but it was shoehorned to obfuscated. In Arabic letter shapes are different depending on whether they are in the beginning , middle or end of a word. As a matter of fact, all of the knowledge needed for deciphering ancient texts and their complexity was derived from the Qur'an. It was by analyzing the syntactic structure of the Qur'an that the Arabic root system was developed. This system was first attested to in Kitab Al-Ayin, the first intralanguage dictionary of its kind, which preceded the Oxford English dictionary by 800 years. It was through this development that the concept of Arabic roots was established and later co-opted into the term 'semitic root,' allowing the decipherment of ancient scripts. In essence, they quite literally copied and pasted the entirety of the Arabic root. Hebrew had been dead, as well as all the other dialects of Arabic, until being 'revived' in a Frankensteinian fashion in the 18th and 19th centuries. The entire region spoke basically the same language, with mumbled dialect continuums spread about, and Arabic is the oldest form from which all these dialects branched off. As time passed, the language gradually became more degenerate, Language; When one looks at the actual linguistics, one will find that many were puzzled by the opposite, that is, how the other "semetic" languages were more "evolved" than Arabic, while Arabic had archaic features, not only archaic compared to bibilical Hebrew, Ethiopic, "Aramaic" contemporary "semetic" languages, but even archaic compared to languages from ancient antiquity; Ugaritic, Akkadain. What is meant here by Archaic is not what most readers think, it is Archaic not in the sense that it is simple, but rather that it is complex (think Latin to pig Latin or Italian or Old English, which had genders and case endings to modern English), not only grammatically, but also phonetically; All the so called semitic languages are supposed to have evolved from protosemetic, the Alphabet for protosemitic is that of the so called Ancient South Arabian (which interestingly corresponds with the traditional Arabic origins account) and has 28 Phonemes. Arabic has 28 phonemes. Hebrew has 22, same as Aramaic, and other "semitic" languages. Now pause for a second and think about it, how come Arabic, a language that is supposed to have come so late has the same number of letters as a language that supposedly predates it by over a millennium (Musnad script ~1300 BCE). Not only is the glossary of phonemes more diverse than any other semitic language, but the grammar is more complex, containing more cases and retains what's linguists noted for its antiquity, broken plurals. Indeed, a linguist has once noted that if one were to take everything we know about languages and how they develop, Arabic is older than Akkadian (~2500 BCE). And then the Qur'an appeared with the oldest possible form of the language thousands of years later. This is why the Arabs of that time were challenged to produce 10 similar verses, and they couldn't. People think it's a miracle because they couldn't do it, but I think the miracle is the language itself. They had never spoken Arabic, nor has any other language before or since had this mathematical precision. And when I say mathematical, I quite literally mean mathematical. Now how is it that the Qur'an came thousands of years later in an alphabet that had never been recorded before, and in the highest form the language had ever taken? The creator is neither bound by time nor space, therefore the names are uttered as they truly were, in a language that is lexically, syntactically, phonemically, and semantically older than the oldest recorded writing. In fact, that writing appears to have been a simplified version of it. Not only that, but it would be the equivalent of the greatest works of any particular language all appearing in one book, in a perfect script and in the highest form the language could ever take. It is so high in fact, that it had yet to be surpassed despite the fact that over the last millennium the collection of Arabic manuscripts when compared on word-per-word basis in Western Museums alone, when they are compared with the collected Greek and Latin manuscripts combined, the latter does not constitute 1 percent of the former as per German professor Frank Griffel, in addition all in a script that had never been recorded before. Thus, the enlightenment of mankind from barbarism and savagery began, and the age of reason and rationality was born from its study. God did bring down the Qur’an, Mohamed is his Messenger.
After i watched this video with clear details i just realized how lucky and blessed islam and its followers is. Alhamdulilah for such videos that increase our iman everyday.
Fire video bro, if any Muslim bro wants to refer to videos rebutting these claims please feel free to share, I like to see the arguments from both sides. It's hard to find videos of Muslim apologists successfully defending their faith against these challenges
Muslims have debunked these arguments centuries ago. Christians keep coming back with the same weak debunked arguments over and over again. If you think ppl haven't responded to these than you haven't even tried looking for answerr.
any acedmic research will tell you what this guy is saying about Islam is stupid and based on biased claims. this guys has no firm academic research about Islam, he is not an Islamic scholar/researcher. he is a Christian apologist who thinks he knows more about Islam than most Muslims, which is rich. that's like me saying i know more about Christianity than Christians when i'm a Muslim (even tho i'm an ex Christian).
if you are so interested (not passive aggressive) then please get the right information i am begging you from the first 4 minutes this man has given ENTIRE wrong information and his logic is just that if anything in the bible is different in the quran then it is wrong its literally just comparing the 2 books he hasnt studied islam properly
Fr people thinking they're giga-geniuses who dump down endless scriptures of who-knows-what translated hadiths & ayats into the comment section really thinking people are gonna read allat. Religious debates are a joke nowadays.
Quick reminder that not all Protestants are iconoclasts. Especially not most evangelicals. The closest that most evangelicals get is the idea that some people treat icons like idols, which is certainly true. Just like the crying Mary statue.
Catholics always assume stuff about protestantism that isn't true. From my experience on the internet ive seen way more catholic iconoclasts than protestant iconoclasts.
@rabielazazi787 ah, your book says your allowed to lie tho? And that Allah is the greatest deciever😂😂😂 it's right infront of your eyes kid, just open them
The Bible proves that Muhammad (saws) is a true Prophet! - [The word "Prophet" comes from the word "prophecy"] - Deuteronomy 18:22 "If a prophet speaks in the name of the Lord but the thing does not take place or prove true, it is a word that the Lord has not spoken." - In the previous verse, it is asked how one can distinguish a TRUE prophet from a FALSE prophet. - The answer was that only a TRUE prophet makes prophecies that ACTUALLY happen. - And you know what? Muhammad (saws) made HUNDREDS of prophecies that are very precise and yet ACTUALLY happened!
@@lcrevilla The Bible proves that Muhammad (saws) is a true Prophet! - [The word "Prophet" comes from the word "prophecy"] - Deuteronomy 18:22 "If a prophet speaks in the name of the Lord but the thing does not take place or prove true, it is a word that the Lord has not spoken." - In the previous verse, it is asked how one can distinguish a TRUE prophet from a FALSE prophet. - The answer was that only a TRUE prophet makes prophecies that ACTUALLY happen. - And you know what? Muhammad (saws) made HUNDREDS of prophecies that are very precise and yet ACTUALLY happened!
@@Cosmophilicjohn 10:30 Jesus says “I and the father are one” hmm Jesus still isn’t god yet? John 14:6 Jesus says “I am the way the truth and the life no comes through the father except through me” The Bible still doesn’t say Jesus isn’t god?
@@scaledsilverthe Bible says Israel would be a nation again. After 2000 years it happened Israel became a nation. How do you disprove such a specific prophecy????
@@ECA419 Israel became a nation again in 1948, 2000 thousand years after. The biblical Israel isn't the Israel of today its materialistic and flooded with the mark of the fallen, though many delusional addicts to living in the last days type of people tend to want to understand this prophecy in a misunderstood way. Isaiah 53 is not about Israel today or Jesus, but about the Israel that was finished off in AD70. None of the prophesies in the Bible were aimed at events thousands of years in the future - they were all aimed at the very near future which never came to be thus we are left with a husk of a nation. Ezekiel 34:13 was fulfilled with the resurrection, not when a bunch of unbelievers of the crucifixion decided to create a new country in the Levant. The true prophecy is biblically that the generation that sees "Israel" rise again (us) shall be the last generation. which may be a fact as now we are headed into a possibly ww3 because the modern corrupt Israel is practicing the same delusion of violence the old testaments devil(god) carried. wake up. do you not see the massive amount of contradictions these texts carry? Israel isn't the nation of god, but is a tool for destruction, The real Israel and its people died.
@@scaledsilver say what you will! It’s all chatter. Jesus is coming back to what we call Israel and it exist today!!! He setting foot on the mount of olives. It’s a miracle. One day they will “believe in the one they pierced it’s prophesied” (Jesus) it’s going to happen. Islam is false. For crying out loud Muhammad has no claim to be a major prophet for the people he’s not even Jewish. He’s an Arab who plagiarized the Bible to fit his own perverted narrative. The guys married an 6 years. Took a flying donkey to “Jerusalem” that nobody saw 🤣🤣🤣 by the way Jerusalem is not even named in the Quran not even once. He’s self appointed. Nobody was self appointed in scripture not one.
@@gregkareem9824Judaism was the first abrahamic religion, its a historical fact, not opinion, that Judaism became a religion long before christianity, and like the video stated, islam stole from Judaism. but we, jews AND christians, can both be OGs 😛
Thank you for making this. Some of the arguments for Islam are like throwing an arrow and drawing a circle where it lands, then claiming you hit the mark.
Both Muhammad & Moses enabled their followers to conquer Palestine. Each gave a law, fled from their enemies (Moses to Midian, Muhammad to Medina, we know that geographically, Biblical Midian is located in modern day Western Saudi Arabia), marched to battle against their enemies, wrought miracles. These correlations prove that Muhammad (ﷺ) is the Prophet according to Deuteronomy 18:15, 18 Both Muhammad & Moses (Peace be upon them) were brought up in their enemies' houses, appeared among idolaters, were at first rejected by their own people and afterward accepted by them. 📖 The LORD your GOD will raise up for you a Prophet like me (Moses) from your midst, from your brethren. Him you shall hear, I will raise up for them a Prophet like you from among their brethren, and will put My words in his mouth, and he shall speak to them all that I command him.' Deuteronomy 18:15, 18 predicted prophet Muhammad (ﷺ), the descendants of Ishmael, the Arabs.. Since "from your midst" does not appear in either the ancient Greek Old Testament (the Septuagint) or the Samaritan Pentateuch, the original text must state the prophet (Muhammad ﷺ) would come from the relatives of the Israelites, the descendants of Ishmael, the Arabs. Your God said in 📖 Duetornomy 18:20 that false prophet from their nearby brother tribe (the Arabs) must die without fulfilling the prophecies of Isaiah 42. GOD of Bible also informed us that the true prophet (Muhammad ﷺ) from their nearby brother tribe (the Arabs) would talk about the same GOD of Moses and fulfill prophecies of duetornomy 18:18 as well as Isaiah 42. Also, one notices from the Gospel of John (1:19-21) that the Jews were waiting for the fulfillment of three distinct prophecies. The first was the coming of Christ. The second was the coming of Elijah. The third was the coming of the Prophet (Muhammad ﷺ. An Arabian prophet mentioned in Isaiah 42:11 to fulfill the prophecies of Isaiah 42.) 📖 Deuteronomy 18:20 But any prophet who falsely claims to speak in my name or who speaks in the name of another god must die.’ 📖 Deuteronomy 18:21 “But you may wonder, ‘How will we know whether or not a prophecy is from the Lord? 📖 Deuteronomy 18:22 If the prophet speaks in the Lord’s name but his prediction does not happen or come true, you will know that the Lord did not give that message. That prophet has spoken without my authority and need not be feared. Our Prophet Muhammad (ﷺ) passed all the above conditions stated by TRUE GOD of Bible in Deuteronomy 18:18-22 for identifying the true prophet. This is obvious from the three questions that were posed to John the Baptist: “Now this was John’s testimony, when the Jews of Jerusalem sent priests and Levites to ask him who he was. He did not fail to confess, but confessed freely, “I am not the Christ.” They asked him, “Then who are you? Are you Elijah?” He said, “I am not.” “Are you the Prophet?” He answered, “No.” (📖 John 1:19-21) If we look in a Bible with cross-references, we will find in the marginal notes where the words “the Prophet” occur in John 1:21, that these words refer to the prophecy of 📖 Deuteronomy 18:15 and 18:18. We conclude from this that Jesus Christ is not the prophet mentioned in Deuteronomy 18:18. From the brothers of the Israelites: Abraham had two sons, Ishmael and Isaac (Genesis 21). Ishmael became the grandfather of the Arab nation, and Isaac became the grandfather of the Jewish nation. The prophet spoken (in Deuteronomy 18:15-22) of was not to come from among the Jews themselves, but from among their brothers, i.e. the Ishmaelites. Muhammad, a descendant of Ishmael, is indeed this prophet. Also, Isaiah 42:1-13 speaks of the servant of GOD (abd - ullah), His “chosen one” (Mustafa) in whom I delight (Habibullah’) and “messenger” who will bring down a law. “He will not falter or be discouraged till he establishes justice on earth. In his law the islands will put their hope.” (Isaiah 42:4). see Isaiah 42:21 talks about magnified laws (Al-Quran,Shariah.)
ua-cam.com/video/MfdNxRX6Dbs/v-deo.html Kyle isnt a smart person please listen to this video if you want to clear up on your mind about Islam. Kyle fails on his accusations and this video explains it well
@prophetmuhammadinbibleisaiah I’m not reading all of that. Plus, your UA-cam name is too lengthy not to mention false. Opinion rejected. Christ is King!
@@michaelbarry1664 well you are just rejecting a Opinion you didnt even listened. First read it with a open mind, Islam is the way to the truth and Im just inviting you to way of the truth. Just read what my brother has written after it the choice to go in the way or not is yours.
@@Floki_47 You don't know what that 'right path' is, you just think you do because you've been brainwashed. And bribed - you get to look down on the rest of humanity while still in this world, and get your e*ection, virgins, boys, wine etc in the hereafter. It must be the right path if it leads to egotism and sleaze, it simply can't be otherwise.
Watch Phillion's video regarding the subject. (Even if he's possibly an Atheist) It's pretty great at going over the historical fallacies as well as the hęrėsy found within the primary contents and practices there.
Bruh... allah hates sin and refuses to even directly interact with his own creation/mankind on earth... but, for some reason... even though he would NEVER allow himself to dirty/lower himself by coming to earth and interacting with man (even though he created them in the first place) directly... he literally brings man into his heavenly home itself and dirties it that way. Not only that, but he orders man on earth not to commits sins, not to have lust/sex with women, not to drink alcohol, etc.... BUT THEN, for some reason (even though he'd never interact with mankind or show himself because its beneath him/ungodly), once you get to HEAVEN, not only can you drink alcohol and have sex and sin... but 'supposed' believers are promised dozens upon dozens of virgins who you can fck to your heart's content, that allah then re-virginizes for you to have sex with again and again... and not only can you now drink alcohol in heaven (AKA, taint god's home/presence/name), but he will provide you with "rivers of wine" for you to drink to your heart's content!!! That's disgusting! It's literally anti-god. Why would God ever allow sin into his holy, heavenly abode??? Especially, why would he allow sin and unholy behavior in heaven... SPECIFICALLY when allah is supposedly so separate, holy, and pure that he won't even physically go to man/earth and interact with the sinful lifeforms that He himself created (thus dirtying himself). Its illogical and makes no sense. Its sinful and disgusting, and if allah truly kept separate from mankind on Earth to keep/maintain his separate, oneness, holiness... then why would he EVER allow that kind of behavior/sin to exist/occur in the purity of HEAVEN itself?!?!?! There's sooo many other reasons why Muhammed/Islam is so messed up/dirty/sinful/non-godlike... but that alone should bring you a great number of questions to ask yourself. Then, when you include the Quran introducing the bird-goddesses in addition to god himself (which not only destroys the supposed sanctity of the oneness of allah, but also destroys the eternal and infallibility of the Word of god itself); when you include the disgusting behaviors of Muhammed (who was supposedly a moral example for mankind for time immemorial) and compare them to the perfect, sinless life of Jesus; and the inconsistencies all throughout the Quran and the Hadiths and the history of Islam itself... it should open the flood-gates for a tsunami of questions to ask yourself concerning the truth/lies within islam, and it will hopefully set you on the right path towards the single, one, perfect, true God. Good luck my friend, and may God give you peace, direction, and forgiveness as you begin your journey to finding the everlasting, unyielding, loving, and spotless truth of God.@@Youraverageytwatcherr
@@Youraverageytwatcherr Exactly. I can't reason you out of something you haven't been reasoned into, espescially not through a comment section. Alas, I urge you to wake up.
Don't forget Islam's view on dogs compared to literally every other culture. In Islam you're not supposed to have a dog as a pet, though a guard dog is ok if it has a job etc. This is all because the "angel" Gabriel was supposed to visit Muhammad but refused entry as Aisha snuck a dog in earlier. According to Islam if you have a pet in your home or in general, you lose out on your good deeds daily... Muslims claim it's because dogs carry diseases and are impure, affecting prayer etc but why would that affect an angel? "Angels" according to Islam apparently also can't enter homes if you have a pictures of people on the walls, so goodbye pictures of Grandma XDXD The funny thing is, in pre-islamic folklore, they used to associate wolves with warding off evil and bad spirits; preventing them from changing form... Dogs are the Descendants of wolves... So maybe Muhammad was being manipulated by something this whole time, condoning his messed up actions like abolishing adoption because he was lusting after his adopted son's wife and his lustful/violent life in general...
bismillah, lets tackle the statements 1 by 1. The Prophet (ﷺ) said, "Angels do not enter a house in which there is a dog or there are pictures." Sahih al-Bukhari 5949 In-book reference : Book 77, Hadith 165 In a narration of Muslim, the Messenger of Allah (ﷺ) is reported to have said: "He who keeps a dog for any reason other than to guard his property (lands) or his flock of sheep, his good deeds equal to two Qirat will be deducted every day." Riyad as-Salihin 1689 In-book reference : Book 17, Hadith 179 So with these 2 hadiths in mind, yes an angel won't enter a home with a dog in it, BUT it has nothing to do with impurity and what not it's just a command by Allah no more and no less. 'condoning his messed up actions like abolishing adoption' Adoption wasn't abolished it was given another form like: Sponsoring an orphan in Islam is to include an orphan, spend on him, and take care of his interests and affairs. and fun fact: many of the companions had "adopted" sons like Zayd ibn Ḥāritha al-Kalbī he adopted Hakim ibn Hizam Many Hadith about sponsoring an orphan that our beloved the Prophet Mohammad said. The Messenger of Allah (saw) said, ‘The best house among the Muslims is the house in which orphans are well-treated. The worst house among the Muslims is the house in which orphans are ill-treated’. Reference : Al-Adab Al-Mufrad 137 In-book reference : Book 7, Hadith 9 But you say wait what's the difference then? Well for one you cant change his family name, Because the adoptive family can’t take the place of the biological family, they act as guardians and are responsible for the care of another person’s child. Allah Ultimately told us in the Quran how he doesn’t leave the orphans or in need alone: Did He not find you an orphan and shelter you? And He found you wandering, and He guided you. And He found you in need and made you independent. Therefore, treat not the orphan with harshness, nor drive away a petitioner (unheard). But the bounty of the Lord - rehearse and proclaim! (Quran 93:6-11) Second, The child who took with Kafalah does not inherit from the family who sponsors him because Kafalah is not one of the reasons for an inheritance "and his lustful/violent life in general..." Well first the lustful part, if He was truly lustful, why did he only marry one woman that was 40 and already have children and stayed married to ONLY her for 24 years (until she died) if he was lustful? and lets look at his other marriages, 2nd marriage was a 50 year old woman, cool 3rd Aa’ishah bint Abi Bakr al-Siddeeq 9, cool 4th Hafsah bint ‘Umar 25, cool Keep in mind he married these woman in his 60s when lust in men is at the lowest point. and i can go on and on. Is this truly a lustful man? he married a woman in her 40s for 25 years then only remarried in his 60s when HE was approached a mans libido is at his lowest during his 60s So first part of the claim debunked id say second part, "violent life in general" So lets see was he violent, did he ever START wars? no 1st war was caused by the infidels at the battle of badr 2nd was again not caused by him and so on and so forth Now lets see when he DID win wars for example the conquest of mekkah what did he do to the inhabitants? did he annihilate them all? keep in mind these are the people who TORTURED, KILLED and exiled him and his companions for a DECADE so what did he say? The Prophet (saw) then addressed the very people who had oppressed and slandered him and who persecuted and killed his companions. He asked them what they thought he would do with them, to which they replied, ‘You are our noble brother, son of our noble brother! We expect nothing but goodness from you.’ The Prophet (saw) said, ‘I say to you as Yusuf (Joseph) said to his brothers, “No blame upon you today. Allah will forgive you, for He is the Most Merciful of the merciful.”’ [The Noble Qur’an, 12:92] In another narration, the Prophet (saw) said to them, ‘Go, you are free.’ la illah illa allah muhammed rasul allah (theres no god but allah and muhammed is his prophet) but WAIT did he brutally extinguish cities like the mongols when he conquered, what were his rules of war? Now let us see what rights Islam has conferred on the combatants. Torture with Fire? Impermissable Protection of the Wounded The Prisoner of War Should not be Slain No one Should be Tied to be Killed No Looting and Destruction in the Enemy's Country Sanctity of Property The Muslims have also been prohibited from taking anything from the general public of a conquered country without paying for it Return of Corpses of the Enemy Prohibition of Breach of Treaties Protection of civilians and non-combatants The Holy Prophet (may peace be upon him) has given clear instructions about the behaviour of the Muslim army. He observed: "Set out for Jibad in the name of Allah and for the sake of Allah. Do not lay hands on the old verging on death, on women, children and babes. Do not steal anything from the booty and collect together all that falls to your lot in the battlefield and do good, for Allah loves the virtuous and the pious." Prohibition against indiscriminate weapons and so on you can read more here: www.iium.edu.my/deed/hadith/muslim/019_smt.html#:~:text=The%20Holy%20Prophet%20(may%20peace%20be%20upon%20him)%20has%20given,on%20women%2C%20children%20and%20babes. Anyone reading this and maybe the commentor himself can learn from this and i will say as the caliph abu bakr the companion of the prophet said "If I Do Good, Help Me; and If I Do Wrong, Correct Me" Thanks to all
From the very first word of the Quran it appears obvious to me that Mohammad did not understand how information is transferred through reading a text. It must’ve seemed like magic to him. He also seemed not to comprehend that books were able to be copied and distributed far and wide and that if you changed one copy it did not affect all the others.
Are there certain parts of each religion that you don't like/agree with/turned you away from them, specifically? Or, do you just not believe in any sort of god/divine power, just in general?
@user-xp5id1kh4r a lot of us are uninterested in religion because of how many transcripts get things very wrong scientifically Atheists like OP believe that God isn't real, while an agnostic like me doesn't deny a God, but just doesn't involve themselves in religion
@@JohnDorian-j7x I presume that Calizen believes in the Holy Trinity: "proton, electron, neutron" & the "divine power" is the nuclear binding energy of Atom ⚛️.
Now that makes me wonder: is he a Dyothelitist who believes in both the Strong and the Weak Nuclear Forces as separate forces, or an apostate that believes they are one in the same... aka, a Monothelitist? @@The_Green_Man_OAP
*15 Astonishing facts About Islam That you Really don't know !* *1)* *“Islam” means “surrender” or “submission”* . “Salam” (which means “peace”) is the root word of “Islam”. In a religious context the word “Islam” means “the surrendering of one’s will (without compulsion) to the true will of God in an effort to achieve peace”. *2)* *“Muslim” means “anyone or anything that surrenders itself to the true will of God”.* By this definition, everything in nature (trees, animals, planets, etc.) are “muslims” because they are in a state of surrender to God’s will. In other words, they are fulfilling the purpose for which God created them. *3)* *Islam is not a new religion or cult.* It is a universal way of life and civilization. *Again, Islam is not a new religion,* rather it is the same message preached by all earlier prophets such as Adam, Noah, Abraham, Moses, and Jesus (peace be upon them all). But God’s final message to mankind was revealed to the last prophet, Muhammad (peace be upon him), as a revival of lost teachings of previous prophets and as a reconfirmation of the eternal message. Studies show that between 1.5 and 1.8 billion people in the world identify their religion as Islam. Along with Judaism and Christianity it traces its roots through Prophet Abraham and back to the first humans Adam and Eve. *4)* *There are five pillars of practice in Islam.* These practices must be undertaken with the best of effort in order to be considered a true Muslim: A) Declaration of faith: A statement proclaiming the belief in One God and that Muhammad is a prophet of God. To become Muslim a person simply recites this statement publicly, and in Arabic. B) Formal prayer five times a day. C) Poor-due tax: 2.5% of one’s excess wealth given to the needy once a year. D) Fasting during the daylight hours in the month of Ramadan. E) Pilgrimage to Mecca at least once, if physically and financially able. *5)* *There are six articles of faith in Islam.* These are the basic beliefs that one must have in order to be considered a true Muslim. They are belief in: A) the One God. B) all of the true prophets of God. C) the original scriptures revealed to Moses, David, Jesus and Muhammad. D) the angels. E) the Day of Judgment and the Hereafter. F) destiny. *6)* *Muslims believe in the one Creator of the Universe, referring to Him as “Allah”* which is the Arabic word for “God”. Muslims worldwide, even English-speaking Muslims, frequently use the Arabic word “Allah” because Arabic is the language of the Qur’an. But Allah is no different than the God of Abraham, Moses and Jesus. The Creator is the Creator regardless of what people call Him. In the English language He is most commonly referred to as “God”. Yet Jesus spoke a different language, referring to God as “Eloi” in Mark 15:34 of the New Testament. Are “God” and “Eloi” different gods? Many Hispanics call God “Dios” and many French say “Dieu”. It would logically follow then that people who refer to God as “Allah” in the Arabic language are referring to the very same God. In fact, many Arab Jews and Arab Christians call God “Allah”. And the word “Allah” is written in Arabic script on the walls of many Arab churches and on the pages of Arabic Bibles. So while the understanding of God may differ between faith groups, the various names used to describe Him does not change the fact that the one Creator of the Universe is the God of all people. This is *Allah* Almighty, The Creator, the one and only true God. He is my God, our God: *"Allah - there is no deity except Him, the Ever-Living, the Sustainer of [all] existence. Neither drowsiness overtakes Him nor sleep. To Him belongs whatever is in the heavens and whatever is on the earth. Who is it that can intercede with Him except by His permission? He knows what is [presently] before them and what will be after them, and they encompass not a thing of His knowledge except for what He wills. His Kursi (Throne) extends over the heavens and the earth, and their preservation tires Him not. And He is the Most High, the Most Great."* (Quran 2:255) *{Say, “He is Allah, the One. Allah, to Whom the creatures turn for their needs. He begets not, nor was He begotten, and there is none like Him.” }* (Quran, 112:1-4) Allah Almighty says in the Quran: *"Say, "O My servants who have transgressed against themselves [by sinning], do not despair of the mercy of Allah . Indeed, Allah forgives all sins. Indeed, it is He who is the Forgiving, the Merciful."* [Quran 39:53] *7)* *The Islamic concept of God* is that He is loving, merciful and compassionate. Islam also teaches that He is all-knowing and the perfect judge of affairs, and will punish (or forgive) accordingly. However, Allah once said to Muhammad, “My mercy prevails over my wrath”. So Islam teaches a balance between fear and hope, protecting one from both complacency and despair. *8)* *Muslims believe that God has revealed 99 of His names, or attributes, in the Qur’an.* It is through these names that one can come to know the Creator. A few of these names are the All-Merciful, the All-Knower, the Protector, the Provider, the Near, the First, the Last, the Hidden and the Source of All Peace. *9)* *The Christian concept of “vicarious atonement” (the idea that Jesus died for the sins of humanity) is alien to the Islamic concept of personal responsibility.* Islam teaches that on the Day of Judgment every person will be resurrected and will be accountable to God for their every word and deed. Consequently, a practicing Muslim is always striving to be righteous while hoping and praying for God’s acceptance and grace. *10)* *Muslims believe in all of the true prophets* that preceded Muhammad, from Adam to Jesus. Muslims believe they brought the same message of voluntarily surrendering to God’s will (islam, in a generic sense) to different peoples at different times. Muslims also believe they were “muslims” (again, in a generic sense) since they followed God’s true guidance and surrendered their will to Him. *11)* *Muslims neither worship Muhammad nor pray through him.* Muslims worship the Unseen, Omniscient Creator, Allah. *12)* *Muslims accept the original unaltered Torah (as revealed to Moses) and the original unaltered Bible (as revealed to Jesus)* since they were revealed by God. But none of these scriptures exist today in their original form or in their entirety. Therefore, Muslims follow the subsequent, final and preserved revelation of God, the Qur’an. *13)* *The Qur’an was not authored by Muhammad.* It was authored by God, revealed to Muhammad (through angel Gabriel) and written into physical form by his companions. *14)* *The original Arabic text of the Qur’an contains no flaws or contradictions* and has not been altered since its revelation. *15)* *Actual 7th century Qur’ans, complete and intact,* are on display in museums in Turkey and other places around the world. 🔹️ *EVIDENCE ISLAM IS TRUTH* The following are Scientific, logical, and historical proofs that Islam is the Truth: www.islamreligion.com/category/33/evidence-islam-is-truth/ 🔸️ *For more information about Islam:* www.islam-guide.com 🔹️ *Everything to know about the Prophet of Islam* rasoulallah.net/en/articles/article/6818/ 🔹️ *"Myths about The Prophet of Islam"* www.muhammadfactcheck.org 🔹️ *Islam and Racism* Islam with its universal concept of brotherhood rejects all artificial and man-made marks of distinction. Allah Almighty says in the noble Quran: "O mankind, indeed We (Allah) have created you from male and female and made you peoples and tribes that you may know one another. Indeed, the most noble of you in the sight of Allah is the most righteous of you. Indeed, Allah is Knowing and Acquainted." *(Quran 49:13)* No one can claim any superiority over the other based on race, color, language or wealth and this is emphasized in the last sermon of Prophet Muhammad (peace be upon him) showing high regard of humanity irrespective of color or race: "“All mankind is from Adam and Eve, an Arab has no superiority over a non-Arab nor a non-Arab has any superiority over an Arab; also a white has no superiority over a black nor does a black have any superiority over a white except by piety and good action.” 🔹️ *How to convert (revert) to Islam* Basically to become a Muslim is very simple.. you need to say the decleration of faith oraly while you believe in it by heart with a firm conviction and unshakeable faith. *The decleration of Faith in Islam (The Shahada)* The Shahada (in Arabic) can be declared as follows : *“ASH-HADU ANLA ELAHA ILLA-ALLAH WA ASH-HADU ANNA MOHAMMADAN RASUL-ALLAH”* The English translation is : *“I bear witness that there is no deity (none truly to be worshipped) but, Allah, and I bear witness that Mohammad is the messenger of Allah.”* However, it would not be sufficient for anyone to only utter this testimony oraly either in private or in public; but rather, he should believe in it by heart with a firm conviction and unshakeable faith. If one is truly sincere and complies with the teachings of Islam in all his life, he will find himself a new born person. 🔹️ *New Muslim Guide (in several languages)* newmuslimguide.com/ar/languages 🔹️ *New Muslims eLearning site* (It is for new Muslim converts who would like to learn their new religion in an easy and systematic way. Lessons here are organized under levels.) www.newmuslims.com/ 📖 *Order your Free Copy [English Translation of the Quran]* www.quranproject.org/freequran.php ■🖥 🎧 Watch and listen to *"Beautiful Quran Recitation "* (with english subtitles) ua-cam.com/video/GkjNROBu6l0/v-deo.html
Allah is satan Jesus will defeat Allah in the last days of this world You muslims will see that Jesus is God and everyone will bow his knees before him and confess that he is the resurrected Lord
Islam would much rather talk trash about Christianity. Its like that guy who has nothing to offer so he just talks down about the other guy. Islam says muhamed follows all the other prophets yet they have to go outside the quran to find what the other prophets said
And then they'll cry wolf on you when you literally just ask them basic questions, or even just read their book/Quran directly. And call you "rude af" for bringing up anything that might make Islam look bad. Smh
Other way around people dedicate their entire UA-cam lives to bashing Islam lol Christian channels but teach nothing other than why they believe Islam is false meanwhile Ya'll got zionists spitting at u disrespecting Jesus pbuh & his mother smh & no videos on these channels about any of this .. Extremely bizarre behavior
There's more videos/channels like this heaps and bounds then there is the other way around as a matter of fact videos yea but I've never seen an entire Islamic channel fully dedicated to going at Christianity where every single video is about how false it is & it it dies exist I'd keep the same energy & say my brother is definitely unstable if that's all he has to offer rather than teach .. What's even more crazy is even tho we view Jesus (pbuh) different we respect him & his mother The Jews/Zionists do not & somehow a lot of Christians think they have this connection with them & Israel & all that .. Supporting that movement goes 100% against New Testament theology but anything to combat Islam can't make this stuff up 🤦♂️
ua-cam.com/video/MfdNxRX6Dbs/v-deo.html Kyle isnt a smart person please listen to this video if you want to clear up on your mind about Islam. Kyle fails on his accusations and this video explains it well
Exodus 20:4-5 “You must not make any idols. Don't make any statues or pictures of anything up in the sky or of anything on the earth or of anything down in the water. Don't worship or serve idols of any kind, because I, the LORD, am your God.
I pray for your soul’s salvation. The Jinn of your religion are literal polytheistic deities worshipped at the Black Stone before Muhammad assumed control. It is not a spot that was “corrupted” by Polytheism, it was meant for Polytheistic worship. It is cope to not realize the Qu’ran was a mix of early Christian heresies and Jewish religious texts. Your faith is built on a false premise considering it was told that even if a angel testifies anything contrary to the gospels, it is demonic. Your god “allah” is nothing more than a demon in hell. This would explain the particular terroristic extremism of Islam, compared to Christianity. A pure and Holy God versus a deceptive demon, tricking Muhammad and all his followers.
Brother, thank you for this video. I'd also appreciate it if you made a playlist in your channel with ALL your debunks on heresies. Thank you in advance
You really believe a Human being was God of so why didn’t Jesus know things such as the Final hour and Why did he fall on his face in the Gardens of Gesthemanae ??
Jewish people reject the notion that Jesus is the Messiah; they are still awaiting the arrival of the Messiah. So from their perspective, the servant of Isaiah 42 stands as an unfulfilled prophecy of nearly three thousand years as their Messiah is yet to arrive. Now there is a serious issue with this understanding. We’ve already seen that the Prophet Muhammad (ﷺ) fulfils all the criteria mentioned in Isaiah 42, so the question must be asked: why would Isaiah set out criteria that can be fulfilled by individual (Prophet Muhammad) other than the Messiah, if it is indeed the Messiah to whom Isaiah 42 refers? If Isaiah is speaking of the Messiah, then we would expect that he would set out criteria that only the Messiah can fulfil. Otherwise it defeats the purpose of prophecy in the first place, because prophecies are supposed to be specific. Also, one notices from the Gospel of John (1:19-21) that the Jews were waiting for the fulfillment of three distinct prophecies. And The 3rd was the coming of the Prophet (Muhammad ﷺ. An Arabian prophet mentioned in Isaiah 42:11 to fulfill the prophecies of Isaiah 42.) This is obvious from the 3 questions that were posed to John the Baptist: “Now this was John’s testimony, when the Jews of Jerusalem sent priests and Levites to ask him who he was. He did not fail to confess, but confessed freely, “I am not the Christ.” They asked him, “Then who are you? Are you Elijah?” He said, “I am not.” “Are you the Prophet?” He answered, “No.” (John 1:19-21) From this we conclude that Jesus Christ is not the prophet mentioned in Deuteronomy 18:18. Because The first section of Isaiah 42, verses 1 - 17, describe a momentous servant in extremely positive terms, one who will be a “light for the Gentiles (non-jews/christians)” (42:6), will “open eyes that are blind” and “free people from darkness” (42:7) of idols worships. Isaiah 42:11 Even prophecies that This prophet will rise from the city of Medinah, Western Saudi Arabia. This is the righteous servant who will eliminate idolatry and spread justice (TRUE GOD's judgement) throughout the world 🌎. Isaiah 42:21 Said that The God of Bible would magnify the Law to make people righteous. It's the hint about Shariah Law. Any sincere person that interprets Isaiah 42 consistently will see that it simply cannot apply to Jesus, regardless of whether one takes it as a reference to his first or second coming. The fact is that Prophet Muhammad (ﷺ) is the only person in history that has fulfilled all of the criteria set out in Isaiah 42. Now from the point of view of both Christians and Muslims, Jesus is indeed the Messiah. Now If we compare the characteristics of Isaiah 42 with the life and teachings of Jesus as they are portrayed in the New Testament, then the Messiah Jesus falls short in fulfilling the prophecy. For example, Isaiah 42 states that the servant will not cry out:He will not shout or cry out, or raise his voice in the streets. [Isaiah 42:2] This disqualifies Jesus, who complained and literally cried out directly to GOD, according to the Bible, at many points in his ministry: From noon until three in the afternoon darkness came over all the land. About three in the afternoon Jesus cried out in a loud voice, “Elli, Elli, lema sabachthani?” (which means “My GOD, my GOD, why have you forsaken me?”). [Matthew 27:45-46] Actually Jesus spoke Aramaic which is the language that was closely intertwined with Arabic. He said "Eli, Eli" which sounds a little like "Illa, illa" pretty much like "Illah" in Arabic. A Prophet like unto Moses. There were hardly any two prophets who were so much alike as Moses and Muhammad. Both were given comprehensive law code of life, both encountered their enemies and were victors in miraculous ways, both were accepted as prophets/statesmen and both migrated to (Midian/Medinah) following conspiracies to assassinate them. Both (Moses and Muhammad) enabled their followers to conquer the Palestine. The natural birth, family life and death of Moses and Muhammad (ﷺ) but not Jesus. (Peace be upon them all) 📖 Deuteronomy 18:15 Moses continued, “The LORD your God will raise up for you a prophet like me from among your brethren (your brother tribe; the Arabs).. You must listen to him. Since "from your midst" does not appear in either the ancient Greek Old Testament (the Septuagint) or the Samaritan Pentateuch, the original text must state the prophet would come from the relatives of the Israelites, the descendants of Ishmael, the Arabs. King James Bible 📖 The LORD thy GOD will raise up unto thee a Prophet from the midst of thee, of thy brethren, like unto me; unto him ye shall hearken; GOD of Bible said in 📖 Duetornomy 18:20 that false prophet from their nearby brother tribe (the Arabs) must die without fulfilling the prophecies of duetornomy 18:18 as well as Isaiah 42. GOD of Bible also informed us that the true prophet (Muhammad ﷺ) from their nearby brother tribe (the Arabs) would talk about the same GOD of Moses and fulfill the prophecies of duetornomy 18:18 as well as Isaiah 42. The prophet spoken (in Deuteronomy 18:15-22) of was not to come from among the Jews themselves, but from among their brothers, i.e. the Ishmaelites. Muhammad (ﷺ), a descendant of Ishmael, is indeed this prophet. The Awaited Prophet Was to Come From Arabia: Deuteronomy 33:1-2 combines references to Moses, Jesus and Muhammad. It speaks of God (i.e. God’s revelation) coming from Sinai, rising from Seir (probably the village of Sa’ir near Jerusalem) and shining forth from Paran. According to Genesis 21:21, the wilderness of Paran was the place where Ishmael settled (i.e. Arabia, specifically Makkah). The Old Testament also tells us that Ishmael dwelt in a place called Paran: "While he (Ishmael) was living in the Desert of Paran, his mother got a wife for him from Egypt." [Genesis 21:21] We are told that Ishmael will have many descendants and that he will be “made into a great nation”: And as for Ishmael, I have heard you: I will surely bless him; I will make him fruitful and will greatly increase his numbers. He will be the father of 12 rulers, and I will make him into a great nation. [Genesis 17:20] A great nation must refer to one led by a Prophet since this is greatness in GOD’s sight, not mere wealth or power rather it's spiritual, and not material.. That's why Isaiah talks about the rejoicing of the inhabitants of Kedar (2nd son of Ishmael), New International Version 📖 Isaiah 42:11 Let the wilderness and its towns raise their voices; let the settlements where Kedar lives rejoice. Let the people of Sela (in Medina) sing for joy; let them shout from the mountaintops. The Old Testament scholar Charles Foster also identifies the the "Land of Kedar" with ‘Hedjaz’ which is Western Saudi Arabia including its famous cities of Makkah and Madina. [Charles Foster, The historical geography of Arabia, P. 130] KJV Isaiah 60:7 All the flocks of Kedar shall be gathered together unto thee, the rams of Nebaioth shall minister unto thee: they shall come up with acceptance on mine altar, and I will glorify the house of my glory." Genesis 25:13 clearly states that Kedar and Nebaioth are sons of Ishmael (Alaihissalam). Yes, because Bible clearly talks about the Hajj in Mekkha and the rising of Last Prophet prophet Muhammad (ﷺ) of Bible from Medinah, Saudi Arabia. One of the earliest biographies of the Prophet Muhammad (ﷺ), Tabaqat Ibn Sa’d (d. 845 CE), documents one of the chains of genealogy, which confirms that the Prophet was a direct descendant of Ishmael through his second son Kedar.
Hey! I grew up Roman Catholic but I'm still pretty young, (I'm not even a teenager yet) what could I do to look into Orthodoxy? Also my family does know about Vatican II and whats wrong with it
Definitely check out if there is an Orthodox Church near you and see if you can go visit! Get in touch with a priest. Feel free to reach out to me too if you need a friend to talk to :) I'll pray for you bro. God bless you! May the Holy Spirit guide you to the Orthodox Church!
Its all being controlled by Satanist Freemasons: the catholic church, orthodox church, mosques, synagogues, temples, school, book publishing, the TV, the internet.... Dont waste your time with these trolls, my fellow man. Follow your heart.
But of that day and hour knoweth no [man], no, not the angels of heaven, but my Father only. (Matthew 24:36) ‘I am going away and coming back to you.’ If you loved Me, you would rejoice because I said, ‘I am going to the Father,’ for My Father is greater than I. (John 14:28) And this is eternal life, that they may know You, the only true God, and Jesus Christ whom You have sent (John 17:3)
@@ZOI_XC Christian artifacts have been discovered recently, if you look into it you may want to revert to Christianity! Though that's entirely your choice to look into it, just saying Christianity is confirmed truth.
If I got a dollar for every time a non-Muslim asked a Muslim about Hazrat Ayesha's (RA) "age of marriage problem", I would be a millionaire. If I got another dollar for everytime a non-Muslim asked so, didn't listen to the answer and ran away, I would be a trillionare.
Hey Kyle, I have just converted from protestantism to orthodoxy and I feel so much peace and guidance from the orthodox church, truly it is the unchanged, enduring church that Christ established.
@@mrjayz94 Matthew 16:18 "And I tell you that you are Peter, and on this rock I will build my church, and the gates of Hades will not overcome it.". The Kingdom of God did arrive before his generation died, the pentecost within the Orthodox Church is the kingdom of God alive on Earth.
What was the main reason you decided to change over? Was it just more a "feeling" that you got/felt in the orthodox churches, or was it more of a "theological" reason based on scripture?
@@judet137 Jesus said all of the signs in Matthew 24/Mark 13/Luke 21 would happen before this generation passed and they didn’t; the prophecy failed. Jesus was an apocalypticist who preached that everyone would be resurrected and The Pentecost is not the Kingdom of God.
we dont have the same idea of prophecy as they had back then. the idea back then was that under certain conditions, as long as these conditions are met the prophecy will happen. Nowadays prophecies are viewed differently.@@mrjayz94
Islam is the fastest growing religion on the planet, in fact one of its fastest growing segments are that of white British and European women averaging age 27
@@Checkeroute Complete lie. The growth of Islam is ALL birthrate and you don't report the apostacy numbers which we know are VERY LARGE because your Imams and Sheikhs keep complaining about it.
A Muslim's belief is to respect other beliefs. He does not impose himself on others. With simple logic. God is One. He issued His first book, which is the Torah, and He issued the second version of it, which is the Gospel, and then the third version, which is the Qur’an. A Muslim does not become a Muslim unless he believes in the Torah and the Gospel. Do you know that in the text of the Qur’an? Were Muslims the ones who established the Holocaust for the Jews? Were the Muslims the ones who waged the First and Second World Wars and are preparing for the third? Were the Muslims the ones who hit Japan with the nuclear bomb... Were there nuclear weapons in Iraq until it was destroyed... The human conscience must return because the destruction of the planet will be at your hands and not at the hands of the Muslims. Please take the correct knowledge from its owners. There are no media outlets that lie for the interests of tyrants. All my respect to you
@@kallaf1956 with all due respect Yes we are to believe in the books of the former prophets however we are only to believe and concur with the truth that remains therein - not the whole of those books because they had been corrupted. The purpose of God sending Jesus with the Gospel (Injeel) to the Children of Israel was solely due to the corruption of their book (Torah) by their scribes and rabbis. In turn, the Gospel itself was also corrupted. The Bible as we know it today is not the pure unadulterated Gospel (and teachings) of Jesus - however, we are in agreement and hold steadfast to with what truth remains therein. The Quran was the final Revelation that was sent to the totality of mankind for its guidance whereas the Torah and Gospel were for the Israelites.
5 seconds in and your video is already off to a goofy start, very telling about what the rest of your video will be like. Anyway, thanks for reminding me to pray Isha.
@@Hannahplayzrobloz disproved how? Bet you can't point out a single thing 😂 Meanwhile you believe God is one yet your core belief system mentions 3 persons being one God... Believing 3 separate persons are fully God is called polytheism. Ever wonder why Jews and Muslims are forbidden from praying in a Church but are permitted to pray in a Mosque and synagogue? It's cause you're the odd ones out of the 3 Abrahamic religions who came up with a 3 headed God and worship a man. "Mad" lmao I'm more confused about where your logic runs off to on the topic of theology. Alhamdulillah I'm able to use my logic and basic math to deduct that one is one and cannot = 3 no matter how much mental gymnastics I do.
I'm personally agnostic and I see your points with errors, contradiction, and historical inaccuracy. Although aren't mostly all religions built off faith over evidence? Basically, putting trust in ancient testimonials and/or deeds made by followers or the god(s) themselves? I'm sure most of these ancient texts would have a degree of human error, or a sort of supernatural logic in which humans are unable to understand. Informative video, nonetheless. It's cool to see other religious viewpoints and arguments from differing perspectives from time to time.
@@depresspresso84 Contradictions in the Quran Historical anachronisms Scientific inaccuracies Moral issues in the Quran and Hadith Influence of pre-Islamic sources
@@depresspresso84 Issues with the concept of abrogation (later verses overriding earlier ones) Alleged inconsistencies in the preservation of the Quranic text Questionable authenticity of Hadiths The problem of evil and suffering The reliance on faith rather than evidence The existence of numerous sects and interpretations within Islam Criticisms of the concept of jihad The portrayal of women in Islamic texts Discrepancies in the biography of Prophet Muhammad Theological challenges to the concept of Tawhid (absolute monotheism)
@@depresspresso84 Certainly: 16. Discrepancies in Quranic numerical claims 17. Conflict with modern human rights 18. Historical context of revelations 19. Variation in manuscripts 20. Lack of archaeological evidence 21. Philosophical challenges 22. Inconsistencies in early Islamic history 23. The problem of divine command theory 24. Lack of prophecies 25. Cultural and religious syncretism
Thank You for the very informative video, Kyle. It's very interesting. Will you ever cover the books that you have behind you in your videos? Happy New Year!
3:14 The Quran does not say let Christians judge by the gospels. In Islam, they believe Jesus was given a book called The Gospel (al-injeel) similar to how Muhammad was given the Quran. It's not the gospels according to Matthew, Mark, Luke, and John.
There was no record that tells there is a gospel is a book that was given to Jesus. If Quran made it up then that's a different story. And Who gave you guys Quran? Angel Gabriel, not even allah himself, what if devil disguised into that angel and manipulated you all. And even if there is allah, Why would he make a huge mistake?, which is to send another last prophet or to simply change the whole story. Is your allah dumb, he didn't send any prophet for 600 years and sends mohammad after Jesus. Is your allah not able to plan for future and makes a messenger to a man who have committed a lot of sins. After 600 years, all of a sudden there is a rotten messenger and not even your so called allah gave him book but angel gabriel, look like you guys are hugely gambling on your faith on that fake angel
How come this famous ingill hasn't ever been found nor heard of. And if it was supposedly corrupted, did Allah's plan fail? He could have just made it incorruptible so then none would be confused. Allah is the kind of guy who creates the problem and then sells the solution
When I started watching this video I was a devout muslim, after finishing it I had to pray fajr since your yap session took up my entire sleep schedule
ex-jw. i really feel for the muslim brothers and sisters able to break away from this cult. your life is literally in danger after the fact, and life will never be the same. it might be better, though. so much additional free time.
Any muslim who know islam will never convert to christain , i dont want to hurt any person feeling . can u give any avidence that trinity is in bible or how trinity make sence. I studied christainty but my understanding bible is corrupted and jesus never clam to be god and trinity is not in bible and trinity dont make sence etc etc. As my understand Islam is true and there is prove . go and reseach yourself which is the right path i m not saying covert to islam.
@@MegaDreamOobro this guy have blind faith.😂..Any muslim who know islam will never convert to christain , i dont want to hurt any person feeling . can u give any avidence that trinity is in bible or how trinity make sence. I studied christainty but my understanding bible is corrupted and jesus never clam to be god and trinity is not in bible and trinity dont make sence etc etc. As my understand Islam is true and there is prove . go and reseach yourself which is the right path i m not saying covert to islam.
Ephesians 4:31-32: “Let all bitterness and wrath and anger and clamor and slander be put away from you, with all malice, and be kind to one another, tenderhearted, forgiving one another, as God in Christ forgave you.”
Just reset my phone so this is a new account but i wanted to comment regardless. Mashallah, watching this increases my iman. For everyone else reading this, have faith. Jesus peace be upon him was our prophet and so is Muhammed peace be upon him. If you do your due diligence and reaearch for the truth, surely you will find it. Peace and blessings to you all. And if you want to argue against the points made in this video, feel free to do so i will try my best to explain.
the funniest joke they claimining is that quran is the continuation of torah and that all of the prophets of israel are muslims but they also claim that there was never a thing called israel and that torah is false
Not tryna be mean or fight, but being a muslim means submitting your will to god, so if u submit ur will to god ur a muslim, thats literally the definition of a muslim..and YES the torah came first then the quran, but people messed with the torah and edited it, changing a lot of stuff in the torah, but when God brought down rhe quran he had the Prhophet Muhammad and many others memorize it so thaf no one can get away with messing it up, so that means the quran is the updated and protected version of the torah
@@Heartale.o torah has never been edited what's in torah is what's been written to the original 5 scriptures of moses the torah literally said that there's someone that's GOD has spoken with when creating the human kind which is a direct contrary to your quran
@@Heartale.o and can you explain the claim of the muslim community that there have never been a country called israel but it is instead called palestine
The name of Mecca is often claimed to be first recorded by the Greek geographer Ptolemy, who calls it Macoraba in the 2nd century AD. However, this identification is not certain, and some scholars have argued that there are older accounts of Mecca than Ptolemy. For example, some have suggested that Mecca is mentioned in the Assyrian inscriptions of Tiglath-Pileser III (8th century BC) as Magan or Makan, a region ruled by the Arab queen Samsi. Others have proposed that Mecca is referred to in the Old Testament as Paran or Teman, places associated with Ishmael and his descendants. Still others have pointed out that Mecca is attested in some ancient South Arabian inscriptions as Makkah or Makkahum, meaning "temple" or "sanctuary". One inscription from the 3rd century AD reads: "By ʿAthtar of Makkahum and by Almaqah of ʿAwwām and by Dhat-Ḥimyam and by Dhu-Samawi and by Dhat-Baʿdan. I am ʿAbd-Karib son of ʿAbd-Malik son of ʿAbd-Karib son of ʿAbd-Malik son of ʿAbd-Karib son of ʿAbd-Malik son of ʿAbd-Karib son of ʿAbd-Malik son of ʿAbd-Karib son of ʿAbd-Malik son of ʿAbd-Karib son of ʿAbd-Malik son of Ḥaṭṭab. I have made a vow to Makkahum for my life and for my children and for my clan." This inscription shows that Mecca was a place where people made vows and sought blessings from various gods. Another inscription from the 4th century AD reads: "By Almaqah the lord and by Dhat-Ḥimyam and by Dhu-Samawi and by Dhat-Baʿdan. I am Ḥaṭṭab son of Ḥaṭṭab son of Ḥaṭṭab son of Ḥaṭṭab son of Ḥaṭṭab son of Ḥaṭṭab son of Ḥaṭṭab son of Ḥaṭṭab son of Ḥaṭṭab. I have given to Makkahum a gift: two camels with their saddles." This inscription shows that Mecca was a place where people gave gifts and donations to the temple. These inscriptions confirm that Mecca was a well-known and respected city in ancient South Arabia, and that its location was in the same valley surrounded by mountains as it is today.
4:48 I couldn't stop myself from smiling like a villain or Doomguy when he is in front of a room full of demons ready to reap and tear them piece by piece when I saw the meme. Who did the same as me?
I know many Muslims whom wants to convert to Christ and they always ask me to take them out of their countries since there are not religion freedom in Islamic countries 😔, even tho my country is not rich they begged me to bring them here and save them from Islamic regime, i help them every time i can
You help everyone, those who came to you for help, great man, but what makes me confused, about the many Muslims who wants to convert to Christianity, because of their poor financial conditions or what????
Pretty sure none of these "ex-muslims" practiced any prayer or read the Quran in their life, or maybe just reading a verse from the Quran and stopping at the middle of it before reading completely the whole thing.
Thank you brother Kyle for your Amazing Videos you bring which guides everyone into truth and showing us the wrongdoers of this world! Hallelujah, May God grant you success!☦☦❤☝
Now from the point of view of both Christians and Muslims, Jesus is indeed the Messiah. Now If we compare the characteristics of Isaiah 42 with the life and teachings of Jesus as they are portrayed in the New Testament, then the Messiah Jesus falls short in fulfilling the prophecy. For example, Isaiah 42 states that the servant will not cry out:He will not shout or cry out, or raise his voice in the streets. [Isaiah 42:2] This disqualifies Jesus, who complained and literally cried out directly to GOD, according to the Bible, at many points in his ministry: From noon until three in the afternoon darkness came over all the land. About three in the afternoon Jesus cried out in a loud voice, “Eli, Eli, lema sabachthani?” (which means “My GOD, my GOD, why have you forsaken me?”). [Matthew 27:45-46] Actually Jesus spoke Aramaic which is the language that was closely intertwined with Arabic. He said "Eli, Eli" which sounds a little like "Illa, illa" pretty much like "Illah" in Arabic. No, it is not about Jesus. To understand the real identity, we must look at the translation done by the Jews, not the Christian version, because Isaiah is a Jewish book. Verse 53:3 says: Despised and rejected by men, a man of pains and accustomed to illness, and as one who hides his face from us, despised and we held him of no account. Was Jesus despised by all men? Was he accustomed to illness (was he often sick?) does he hide his face from other people? Was he “held of no account”, meaning ignored by others? Clearly, the answer to the above questions is “No”. So this verse does not refer to Jesus. Verse Isaiah 53:7 then states that he opened not his mouth. Wrong! Jesus spoke during his trial with both Pontius Pilot and the Jews. Verse 9 then says that he made his grave with the wicked and rich. Jesus did not make his grave, was buried alone. Yes I know he was meant to be buried like a criminal because he was considered one. But verse 9 says he was to be buried with both. Jesus was buried alone. It then goes on to say that God was please by bruising Jesus and that Jesus's seed would prolong the days in verses Isaiah 53:10-11. Jesus never had any seed. Verse Isaiah 53:12 (which is where your case is strongest) states that his soul shall be poured out unto death. However in the Hebrew and Aramaic texts the word death is not present. Now again assuming this is Jesus (AS) this description fits the Islamic story much better. Jesus was not killed as the word for death is not present. He MAY have been put on the cross. And he was exalted and lifted up (the ascension). But again, this is clearly not Jesus as he does not fulfill this. Jewish people reject the notion that Jesus is the Messiah; they are still awaiting the arrival of the Messiah. So from their perspective, the servant of Isaiah 42 stands as an unfulfilled prophecy of nearly three thousand years as their Messiah is yet to arrive. Now there is a serious issue with this understanding. We’ve already seen that the Prophet Muhammad (ﷺ) fulfils all the criteria mentioned in Isaiah 42, so the question must be asked: why would Isaiah set out criteria that can be fulfilled by individual (Prophet Muhammad) other than the Messiah, if it is indeed the Messiah to whom Isaiah 42 refers? If Isaiah is speaking of the Messiah, then we would expect that he would set out criteria that only the Messiah can fulfil. Otherwise it defeats the purpose of prophecy in the first place, because prophecies are supposed to be specific. Also, one notices from the Gospel of John (1:19-21) that the Jews were waiting for the fulfillment of three distinct prophecies. And The 3rd was the coming of the Prophet (Muhammad ﷺ. An Arabian prophet mentioned in Isaiah 42:11 to fulfill the prophecies of Isaiah 42.) This is obvious from the 3 questions that were posed to John the Baptist: “Now this was John’s testimony, when the Jews of Jerusalem sent priests and Levites to ask him who he was. He did not fail to confess, but confessed freely, “I am not the Christ.” They asked him, “Then who are you? Are you Elijah?” He said, “I am not.” “Are you the Prophet?” He answered, “No.” (John 1:19-21) From this we conclude that Jesus Christ is not the prophet mentioned in Deuteronomy 18:18. The first section of Isaiah 42, verses 1 - 17, describe a momentous servant in extremely positive terms, one who will be a “light for the Gentiles (non-jews/christians)” (42:6), will “open eyes that are blind” and “free people from darkness” (42:7) of idols worships. Isaiah 42:11 Even prophecies that This prophet will rise from the city of Medinah, Western Saudi Arabia. This is the righteous servant who will eliminate idolatry and spread justice (TRUE GOD's judgement) throughout the world 🌎. Isaiah 42:21 Said that The God of Bible would magnify the Law to make people righteous. It's the hint about Al-Quran, Shariah Law. Any sincere person that interprets Isaiah 42 consistently will see that it simply cannot apply to Jesus, regardless of whether one takes it as a reference to his first or second coming. The fact is that Prophet Muhammad (ﷺ) is the only person in history that has fulfilled all of the criteria set out in Isaiah 42. In Isaiah 42:19 nation of Israel is explicitly identified as the blind and condemned people therefore the guiding and righteous servant (Prophet Muhammad ﷺ) must be someone (from the descendants of Ishmael, the Arabs) other than Israel. Because they neglected Duetornomy 18:18 which also predected that this Prophet must have to come from among their brethren (their brother tribe; the Arabs). Just who is this condemned servant? Isaiah makes it clear that the servant of condemnation is none other than the nation of Israel: Who is blind like the one in covenant with me, blind like the servant of the Lord? [Isaiah 42:19] The “one in covenant with me” is a clear reference to the nation of Israel who were in covenant with God at the time Isaiah made this prophecy. Isaiah goes on to make it even more explicit: Who handed Jacob over to become loot, and Israel to the plunderers? [Isaiah 42:24] Yes, Isaiah 42 17-25 describes the pagans and those Jews and christians who rejected the Last Prophet (Muhammad ﷺ) of Bible. The Awaited Prophet Was to Come From Arabia: Deuteronomy 33:1-2 combines references to Moses, Jesus and Muhammad. It speaks of God (i.e. God’s revelation) coming from Sinai, rising from Seir (probably the village of Sa’ir near Jerusalem) and shining forth from Paran. According to Genesis 21:21, the wilderness of Paran was the place where Ishmael settled (i.e. Arabia, specifically Makkah). The Old Testament also tells us that Ishmael dwelt in a place called Paran: "While he (Ishmael) was living in the Desert of Paran, his mother got a wife for him from Egypt." [Genesis 21:21] We are told that Ishmael will have many descendants and that he will be “made into a great nation”: And as for Ishmael, I have heard you: I will surely bless him; I will make him fruitful and will greatly increase his numbers. He will be the father of 12 rulers, and I will make him into a great nation. [Genesis 17:20] A great nation must refer to one led by a Prophet since this is greatness in GOD’s sight, not mere wealth or power rather it's spiritual, and not material.. That's why Isaiah talks about the rejoicing of the inhabitants of Kedar (2nd son of Ishmael), New International Version 📖 Isaiah 42:11 Let the wilderness and its towns raise their voices; let the settlements where Kedar lives rejoice. Let the people of Sela (in Medina) sing for joy; let them shout from the mountaintops. The Old Testament scholar Charles Foster also identifies the the "Land of Kedar" with ‘Hedjaz’ which is Western Saudi Arabia including its famous cities of Makkah and Madina. [Charles Foster, The historical geography of Arabia, P. 130] KJV Isaiah 60:7 All the flocks of Kedar shall be gathered together unto thee, the rams of Nebaioth shall minister unto thee: they shall come up with acceptance on mine altar, and I will glorify the house of my glory." Genesis 25:13 clearly states that Kedar and Nebaioth are sons of Ishmael (Alaihissalam). Yes, because Bible clearly talks about the Hajj in Mekkha and the rising of Last Prophet prophet Muhammad (ﷺ) of Bible from Medinah, Saudi Arabia. Prophet Muhammad (ﷺ), a descendant of Ishmael, is indeed this prophet. Because One of the earliest biographies of the Prophet Muhammad, Tabaqat Ibn Sa’d (d. 845 CE), documents one of the chains of genealogy, which confirms that the Prophet was a direct descendant of Ishmael through his second son Kedar. Hayden’s Bible dictionary states: “Mohammad is said to have been of the Bene-Kedar [sons of Kedar]” [A Bible Dictionary, Hayden Series, edited by Rev. Charles Boutell, p. 386].
ua-cam.com/video/MfdNxRX6Dbs/v-deo.html Kyle isnt a smart person please listen to this video if you want to clear up on your mind about Islam. Kyle fails on his accusations and this video explains it well
@@MaskmanGaming69 you need archealogical proof dumbo.This way i can claim the first human adam was actually adamh and was a hindu sage lol. Without proof it is just a myth
Being called an idolater is rich coming from someone whose religion's central part is a faceless cube with 0 symbolism along with a black rock inside an aluminium vulva. When you point that out, they suddenly discern veneration and worship.
@@nahzea so kissing and venerating a faceless object that has 0 symbolism is less of an idolatry than venerating a depiction of a God that helps us in prayers and communication? Great logic.
@@bljet4388 there's a difference between veneration and worship. In worship you submit to whatever it is you are worshipping. We don't submit to the Ka'abah, we submit to Allah, the owner of the Ka'abah. We venerate the Ka'abah for it's significance. Also, people touch and kiss the black stone for religious purposes: it can act as an expiation of sins due to Allah forgiving the sins which have been absorbed by the stone (search up about how the black stone became black if you want to know more about it), it is a miracle of God, and it is the cornerstone of the Ka'abah, etc. This is just from the best of my knowledge, but Allah knows best.
If Christ did not die on the cross, God's poetic and beautiful nature is quelled. From a living tree came death, but thanks to God from a dead tree (the cross) came ever lasting life.
The Bible proves that Muhammad (saws) is a true Prophet! - [The word "Prophet" comes from the word "prophecy"] - Deuteronomy 18:22 "If a prophet speaks in the name of the Lord but the thing does not take place or prove true, it is a word that the Lord has not spoken." - In the previous verse, it is asked how one can distinguish a TRUE prophet from a FALSE prophet. - The answer was that only a TRUE prophet makes prophecies that ACTUALLY happen. - And you know what? Muhammad (saws) made HUNDREDS of prophecies that are very precise and yet ACTUALLY happened!
Islam, the biggest trust me bro worldview in the world.
They call Christians Polytheists even tho Allah prays 😂
Its literally the biggest troll in history
It's a shame, because islam is the biggest sham in history that deceives even supposedly sane people in the west on a continual basis.
I can tell you don't know about Islam, I am here if you want to clear any doubts
@@AliTanoli-cq3js why did mohammed marry a 6 year old
Thanks man, i was a muslim for 16 years, and after watching this video, i went to pray asr
Praise the Lord!
Best reaction
Lol 😂😂
@@rufinomedado3184Yes Praise Allah All Glory and Majesty to be him
Did you also marry a 6yo?
@@OllieBrady-kp9fx Woodworshipper Comedi successfully failed
As an ex-Mormon I empathize a lot with ex-Muslims. That pain, that familial pressure and ultimate rejection if you leave. I know I lost everything when I left...EVERYTHING. I pray for this brave one, God bless you brother ✝
Be blessed
Bruh
You were a Mormon? Gosh...
Schlözer in his preparation for the Arabia expedition in 1781 coined the term Semitic language:
"From the Mediterranean to the Euphrates, from Mesopotamia to Arabia ruled one language, as is well known. Thus Syrians, Babylonians, Hebrews, and Arabs were one people (ein Volk). Phoenicians (Hamites) also spoke this language, which I would like to call the Semitic (die Semitische)."
-Before Boas: The Genesis of Ethnography and Ethnology in the German By Han F. Vermeulen
He was only half right though, Arabic is the only corollary to "proto-semitic", infact the whole semitic classification is nonsensical for anyone with a somewhat functioning mass between their ears. hebrew, aramaic, rest of madeup dialect continua only have 22 letters of the 29 protosemitic letters Arabic has all 29. The difference betweeen Arabic and the other creoles and Pidgin is the same as that between Latin and pig latin or italian.
|Classical Arabic | 28 consonants, 29 with Hamza and 6 vowels; some consonants are emphatic or pharyngealized; some vowels are marked with diacritics | Complex system of word formation based on roots and patterns; roots are sequences of consonants that carry the basic meaning of a word; patterns are sequences of vowels and affixes that modify the meaning and function of a word | Flexible word order, but VSO is most common; SVO is also possible; subject and object are marked by case endings (-u for nominative, -a for accusative, -i for genitive); verb agrees with subject in person, number, and gender; verb has different forms for different moods and aspects |
| Akkadian | 22 consonants and 3 vowels; some consonants are glottalized or palatalized; vowels are not marked | Similar system, but with different roots and patterns; some roots have more than three consonants; some patterns have infixes or reduplication | Fixed word order of SVO; subject and object are not marked by case endings, but by prepositions or word order; verb agrees with subject in person, number, and gender; verb has different forms for different tenses and aspects |
| Aramaic | 22 consonants and 3 vowels (later variants have more); no emphatic or pharyngealized consonants (except in some dialects); vowels are not marked (except in later variants such as Syriac) | Simple system of word formation based on prefixes and suffixes; some roots or patterns exist, but are less productive than in Arabic or Akkadian |
"Semitic" is just mumbled Arabic, really. Imagine English with a third of its letters removed and simplified grammar. That's Aramaic, Hebrew, etc. For example, combine T and D into just T; there's no need to have 2 letters. The same goes for i, e, y - they should all be just y from now on, etc., etc. Arabic is the only corollary to proto-Semitic. In fact, the whole classification of Semitic languages is nonsensical for anyone with a somewhat functioning brain. Hebrew, Aramaic, and the rest of these made-up dialect continua only have 22 letters out of the 29 proto-Semitic letters. Arabic has all 29. The difference between Arabic and the other creoles and Pidgin is the same as the difference between Latin and pig Latin or Italian. "Phoenician" is an Arabic dialect continuum, and not only that, it is pidgin. It is simplified to the point of stupidity. Anyone with a basic knowledge of Arabic would see this clearly. What happened was that Arabic handicapped "scholars" saw the equivalent of Scottish Twitter spelling, with added mumbling due to phonemic mergers (22 letters, not 29), and mistakenly thought they were seeing a different language."
Let's start with a simple sentence:
## The house is big
Arabic:
البيتُ كبيرٌ
al-bayt-u kabīr-un
Proto-Semitic:
*ʔal-bayt-u kabīr-u
Hebrew:
הבית גדול
ha-bayit gadol
Akkadian:
bītum rabûm
Amharic:
ቤቱ ገደሉ
betu gedelu
As can be seen, Arabic and Proto-Semitic have the same word order (noun-adjective), the same definite article (al-), and the same case endings (-u for nominative). Hebrew and Akkadian have lost the case endings and changed the definite article (ha- and -um respectively). Amharic has changed the word order (adjective-noun) and the definite article (u-).
But Arabic is not only similar to Proto-Semitic, it is also pre-Semitic, meaning that it is the original form of Semitic before it split into different branches. This is because Arabic preserves many features that are not found in any other Semitic language, but are found in other Afro-Asiatic languages, such as Egyptian and Berber. These features include:
- The definite article al-, which is derived from the demonstrative pronoun *ʔal- 'that'. This article is unique to Arabic among Semitic languages, but it is similar to the article n- in Berber and the article p-, t-, n- in Egyptian.
- The dual number for nouns and verbs, which is marked by the suffix -ān or -ayn. This number is rare in other Semitic languages, but it is common in other Afro-Asiatic languages, such as Egyptian and Berber.
- The imperfective prefix t- for verbs, which indicates the second person singular feminine or third person plural feminine. This prefix is unique to Arabic among Semitic languages, but it is similar to the prefix t- in Berber and Egyptian.
- The passive voice for verbs, which is marked by the infix t between the first and second root consonants. This voice is unique to Arabic among Semitic languages, but it is similar to the passive voice in Egyptian and Berber.
Finally, a more complex sentence: The letter was written with a pen.
Arabic:
كُتِبَتِ الرِّسَالَةُ بِالقَلَمِ
kutiba-t al-risāla-t-u bi-l-qalam-i
Proto-Semitic:
*kutiba-t ʔal-risāla-t-u bi-l-qalam-i
Hebrew:
המכתב נכתב בעט
ha-michtav niktav ba-et
Akkadian:
šipram šapāru bēlum
Egyptian:
sḏm.n.f p-ẖry m rnp.t
Berber:
tturra-t tibratin s uccen
Here, Arabic and Proto-Semitic have the same word order (verb-subject-object), the same passive voice marker (-t-), the same definite article (al-), and the same preposition (bi-). Hebrew has changed the word order (subject-verb-object), lost the passive voice marker, changed the definite article (ha-) and the preposition (ba-). Akkadian has changed the word order (object-subject-verb), lost the passive voice marker, changed the definite article (-um) and the preposition (bēlum).
Now how is it that the Qur'an came thousands of years in a language that is lexically, syntactically, phonemically, and semantically older than the oldest recorded writing?
Now how is it that the Qur'an came thousands of years later in an alphabet that had never been recorded before, and in the highest form the language had ever taken?
The creator is neither bound by time nor space, therefore the names are uttered as they truly were, in a language that is lexically, syntactically, phonemically, and semantically older than the oldest recorded writing. In fact, that writing appears to have been a simplified version of it. Not only that, but it would be the equivalent of the greatest works of any particular language all appearing in one book, in a perfect script and in the highest form the language could ever take. It is so high in fact, that it had yet to be surpassed despite the fact that over the last millennium the collection of Arabic manuscripts when compared on word-per-word basis in Western Museums alone, when they are compared with the collected Greek and Latin manuscripts combined, the latter does not constitute 1 percent of the former as per German professor Frank Griffel, in addition all in a script that had never been recorded before. Thus, the enlightenment of mankind from barbarism and savagery began, and the age of reason and rationality was born from its study.
God did bring down the Qur’an, Mohamed is his Messenger.
The Aramaic word for God is Alaha. It's the word Isa PBUH (Jesus as his name is often misspelled due to the lack of the ayin sound in Greek, which was rendered to Iesous, coupling the nearest sound to ayin, same letter found in 'Iraq', which sounds entirely different in Arabic form 'Iran' in Arabic, with the -ous Greek suffix that Greeks typically add to their names 'HerodotOS', 'PlotinUS', 'AchelOUS' and later mumbled into a J). Sounds familiar? Written without the confusing vowels, it is A-L-H ܐ ܠܗܐ (alap-lamed-he) as found in Targum or in Tanakh (Daniel, Ezra), Syriac Aramaic (Peshitta), adducted from the Arabic original (of which Aramaic is a dialect continuum) 'A-L-L-H' (Aleph-Lam-Lam-Ha).
The yeshua rendition of Isa (his name in the Qur'an) PBUH which is purported to be the name of Jesus is KNOWN to had been taken from greek. Western Syriac also use "Isho". Western Aramaic (separate from Syriac which is a dialect of Eastern Aramaic) use "Yeshu". Western Syriac has been separate from Western Aramaic for about 1000 years. And sounds don't even match up. Syriac is a Christian liturgical language yet the four letters of the name of Jesus «ܝܫܘܥ» [ = Judeo-Babylonian Aramaic: «ישוע» ] sounds totally different in West vs East Syriac, viz. vocalized akin to Christian Arabic, Hebrew, Aramaic «ܝܶܫܽܘܥ» (Yēšūʿ) in West Syriac, but pronounced more akin to Muslim Arabic Quran character name Isa in East Syriac «ܝܑܼܫܘܿܥ» (ʾĪšōʿ). The reason for this confusion is their dropping of phonemes as aforementioned. Only someone that has no idea what the letters are or how they sound would have a name ending in a pharyngeal fricative like the ayin, if it were to be used in a name it would have had to be in the beginning, thus the Arabic rendition is the correct one. In addition, The word God in hebrew is eloah, is a cognate of the Arabic I-L-H, pronounced ilah not eloah. Hebrew dropped the glottal stop and mumbled it into eloh, aramic mumbled a little less and it became elah. Infact it is written A-L-H in Arabic, it is pronounced i in Arabic cause it is an Alef with hamza below (إ أ ) They are two different forms of Alef. And it mean "a god", it is the non definitive form of A-L-L-H, in which the Alef is without a glottal stop/hamza,(ا)
"protosemetic" Alphabet (29), Arabic Alphabet (28), Latin transliteration, hebrew (22)
𐩠 𐩡 𐩢 𐩣 𐩤 𐩥 𐩦 𐩧 𐩨 𐩩 𐩪 𐩫 𐩬 𐩭 𐩮 𐩰 𐩱 𐩲 𐩳 𐩴 𐩵 𐩶 𐩷 𐩸 𐩹 𐩺 𐩻 𐩼
ا ب ت ث ج ح خ د ذ ر ز س ش ص ض ط ظ ع غ ف ق ك ل م ن ه و ي
A b t ṯ j h kh d ḏ r z s sh ṣ ḍ ṭ ẓ ʿ ġ f q k l m n h w y
א ב ג ד ה ו ז ח ט י כ ל מ נ ס ע פ צ ק ר ש ת
Merged phonemes in hebrew and aramaic:
ح, خ (h, kh) merged into only kh consonant remain
س, ش (s, sh) merged into only Shin consonant remaining
ط, ظ (ṭ/teth, ẓ) merged into only ṭ/teth consonant remaining
ص, ض (ṣ, ḍ/Tsad ) merged into only ḍ/Tsad consonant remaining
ع, غ (3'ayn, Ghayn) merged into a reducted ayin consonant remaining
ت, ث (t/taw, th) merged into only t/taw consonant remaining
The reason why the protoS alphabet here is 28 and not 29, is because the supposed extra letter is simply a س written in a different position, but it was shoehorned to obfuscated. In Arabic letter shapes are different depending on whether they are in the beginning , middle or end of a word.
This kind of nuance is lost in the dialect continua. As a matter of fact, all of the knowledge needed for deciphering ancient texts and their complexity was derived from the Qur'an. It was by analyzing the syntactic structure of the Qur'an that the Arabic root system was developed. This system was first attested to in Kitab Al-Ayin, the first intralanguage dictionary of its kind, which preceded the Oxford English dictionary by 800 years. It was through this development that the concept of Arabic roots was established and later co-opted into the term 'semitic root,' allowing the decipherment of ancient scripts. In essence, they quite literally copied and pasted the entirety of the Arabic root. Hebrew had been dead, as well as all the other dialects of Arabic, until being 'revived' in a Frankensteinian fashion in the 18th and 19th centuries. The entire region spoke basically the same language, with mumbled dialect continuums spread about, and Arabic is the oldest form from which all these dialects branched off. As time passed, the language gradually became more degenerate, and then the Qur'an appeared with the oldest possible form of the language thousands of years later. This is why the Arabs of that time were challenged to produce 10 similar verses, and they couldn't. People think it's a miracle because they couldn't do it, but I think the miracle is the language itself. They had never spoken Arabic, nor has any other language before or since had this mathematical precision. And when I say mathematical, I quite literally mean mathematical. Now how is it that the Qur'an came thousands of years later in an alphabet that had never been recorded before, and in the highest form the language had ever taken? The creator is neither bound by time nor space, therefore the names are uttered as they truly were, in a language that is lexically, syntactically, phonemically, and semantically older than the oldest recorded writing. In fact, that writing appears to have been a simplified version of it. Not only that, but it would be the equivalent of the greatest works of any particular language all appearing in one book, in a perfect script and in the highest form the language could ever take. It is so high in fact, that it had yet to be surpassed despite the fact that over the last millennium the collection of Arabic manuscripts when compared on word-per-word basis in Western Museums alone, when they are compared with the collected Greek and Latin manuscripts combined, the latter does not constitute 1 percent of the former as per German professor Frank Griffel, in addition all in a script that had never been recorded before. Thus, the enlightenment of mankind from barbarism and savagery began, and the age of reason and rationality was born from its study.real
The fact is, muslims in the comment section didnt even watched the video
Its just so dumb
They only reply to comments otherwise you won't notice them anywhere except the replies . Such cowards
because we know the truth❤
@@JustGaming-pn7fj So what's wrong in giving a reply to a comment? it doesn't matter bro!
@@zakirhossainkhan-ke9dd the quran is quite literally revised (aka copied) from the Bible, there are so many references that u can guarantee are copied. Also why would your god deceive billions into believing into "corrupted text" for 600 years?
Christian: makes a slight critique of islam
Muslims: "It's not the eyes that are blind, but the hearts 😭😭"
because its true
Don't forget, and you christians are "rude asf" too!
Ngl bro Muhammad critiques got all killed
😅😅
Nah usually they ended up beheaded
@@IHateSand0 😂
Never ask a muslim how old aisha was
It was fifteen centuries ago when there was no legal marriage age
@@AsdfgKuystill makes him a pediphile
@@AsdfgKuy still pedophilia
Why?
Whether she was 6, 9, or 16 y.o doesn't matter.
She was a special person marrying another special person.
It was a legal marriage. It's not a shameful event now, and not a shameful event back then, not even the Kafir Quraisy criticize/make fun of the marriage.
@@AsdfgKuy
If by legal you mean lawful, then your statemen is wrong.
Legal marriage exist even back then. And the prophet's marriage was legal. There's witnesses, bride price, guardian of the bride and groom, etc.
Muslims on their way to type
"Muslim for 20 years and after watching this video im still muslim"
Instead of making an actual argument
Why does Islam exist?
@@panda1412. because of "angel Gabriel" who totaly dod not threaten Muhammed
@@amdecentgamingmoveyt1586 so you believe Islam is true?
@@panda1412. nope I never said it 🙅🏻
@@amdecentgamingmoveyt1586 ohh, you're in denial
“We judge Muhammad by his words but never by his actions . If you look at what he did to other Christian’s , pagans and Jews and even women you wouldn’t call him a prophet but a war criminal “ - Geert wilders
Most cult members are never told about all the bad bits, and don't go and check because they fear the consequences. A cult of lies, hate and threats.
@@toddbeamer6131 All cult like this bro, even KKK
Where do you get your perspective on Muhammad PBUH from? Cause clearly you don’t know anything about him or his actions 😭😭
@@yourmom-go3tw Easy to look up information, use your brain
Islam will forever be remembered as a Religion of a war criminal .
What a lovely video,This will cause ZERO controversy
Oh well it’s been a huge controversy for a few millenniums already. That’s why the Middle East has a holy war every decade or so and always has 🤷♂️. OP isn’t causing controversy
You are a liar, you are just throwing words here and there, you are not approaching the Quran with analytical mind, you are not garbing the text itself and scrutinize it, and you are using the bible which itself is not a source of authority because it is corrupted and people change it
and ww2 was between muslims? or ukrain? are you stupid??@@tritontransport
The Aramaic word for God is "Alaha". It's the word Isa PBUH used. Sounds familiar?
Written without the confusing vowels it is written A-L-H ܐ ܠܗܐ (alap-lamed-he) as found in Targum or in Tanakh (Daniel, Ezra), Syriac Aramaic (Peshitta), reduced from the Arabic original (of which Aramaic is a dialect continuum as will be explained) it is written in the Arabic script 'A-L-L-H' (Aleph-Lam-Lam-Ha) add an A before the last H for vocalization.
The word God in another rendition in Hebrew ʾĕlōah is derived from a base ʾilāh, an Arabic word, written without confusing vowel it is A-L-H in the Arabic script, pronounced ilah not eloah. Hebrew dropped the glottal stop and mumbled it, aramic mumbled a little less and it became elaha. Infact both are written written A-L-H in Arabic, it is pronounced i in Arabic and not A because it is an Alef with hamza below (إ أ ) They are two different forms of Alef. And it mean "a god", it is the non definitive form of A-L-L-H, in which the Alef is without a glottal stop/hamza,(ا), but this kind of nuance is lost in the dialect continua.
infact "YHWH" itself is an Arabic word as discussed by Professor. Israel Knohl (Professor of Biblical studies at the Hebrew University of Jerusalem) in the paper" YHWH: The Original Arabic Meaning of the Name."
jesus as his name is often misspelled due to the lack of the ayin sound in Greek, which was rendered to Iesous, coupling the nearest sound to ayin, same letter found in 'Iraq', which sounds entirely different in Arabic form 'Iran' in Arabic, with the -ous Greek suffix that Greeks typically add to their names 'HerodotOS', 'PlotinUS', 'AchelOUS' and later mumbled into a J. The yeshua rendition of Isa (his name in the Qur'an) PBUH which is purported to be the name of Jesus is KNOWN to had been taken from greek. Western Syriac also use "Isho". Western Aramaic (separate from Syriac which is a dialect of Eastern Aramaic) use "Yeshu". Western Syriac has been separate from Western Aramaic for about 1000 years. And sounds don't even match up. Syriac is a Christian liturgical language yet the four letters of the name of Jesus «ܝܫܘܥ» [ = Judeo-Babylonian Aramaic: «ישוע» ] sounds totally different in West vs East Syriac, viz. vocalized akin to Christian Arabic, Hebrew, Aramaic «ܝܶܫܽܘܥ» (Yēšūʿ) in West Syriac, but pronounced more akin to Muslim Arabic Quran character name Isa in East Syriac «ܝܑܼܫܘܿܥ» (ʾĪšōʿ). The reason for this confusion is their dropping of phonemes. Only someone that has no idea what the letters are or how they sound would have a name ending in a pharyngeal fricative like the ayin, if it were to be used in a name it would have had to be in the beginning, thus the Arabic rendition is the correct one. An example in English is how the appended -d is a common error amongst the English pronouncing Gaelic names. The name Donald arose from a common English mispronunciation of the Gaelic name Donal. Just how it is with donal becoming donald and the two becoming distinct and the original being regarded as something seperate so too did Isa PBUH turn to Iesous turn to jesus and when they tried going back to the original they confused it for yeshua ( ysu is how it is actually written) for Isa PBUH ( 3'eysah )
Schlözer in his preparation for the Arabia expedition in 1781 coined the term Semitic language:
"From the Mediterranean to the Euphrates, from Mesopotamia to Arabia ruled one language, as is well known. Thus Syrians, Babylonians, Hebrews, and Arabs were one people (ein Volk). Phoenicians (Hamites) also spoke this language, which I would like to call the Semitic (die Semitische)." -Before Boas: The Genesis of Ethnography and Ethnology in the German By Han F. Vermeulen.
He was only half right though, Arabic is the only corollary to "proto-semitic", infact the whole semitic classification is nonsensical as will be shown.
"protosemetic" Alphabet (28), Arabic Alphabet (28), Latin transliteration, hebrew (22)
𐩠 𐩡 𐩢 𐩣 𐩤 𐩥 𐩦 𐩧 𐩨 𐩩 𐩪 𐩫 𐩬 𐩭 𐩮 𐩰 𐩱 𐩲 𐩳 𐩴 𐩵 𐩶 𐩷 𐩸 𐩹 𐩺 𐩻 𐩼
ا ب ت ث ج ح خ د ذ ر ز س ش ص ض ط ظ ع غ ف ق ك ل م ن ه و ي
A b t ṯ j h kh d ḏ r z s sh ṣ ḍ ṭ ẓ ʿ ġ f q k l m n h w y
א ב ג ד ה ו ז ח ט י כ ל מ נ ס ע פ צ ק ר ש ת
Merged phonemes in hebrew and aramaic:
ح, خ (h, kh) merged into only kh consonant remain
س, ش (s, sh) merged into only Shin consonant remaining
ط, ظ (ṭ/teth, ẓ) merged into only ṭ/teth consonant remaining
ص, ض (ṣ, ḍ/Tsad ) merged into only ḍ/Tsad consonant remaining
ع, غ (3'ayn, Ghayn) merged into a reducted ayin consonant remaining
ت, ث (t/taw, th) merged into only t/taw consonant remaining
The reason why the protoS alphabet here is 28 and not 29, is because the supposed extra letter is simply a س written in a different position, but it was shoehorned to obfuscated. In Arabic letter shapes are different depending on whether they are in the beginning , middle or end of a word.
No such thing as the bible, the new testament is a concoction of several books that were deemed canonical, books written in Greek that were given the hellenized names of Apotsles who neither wrote, nor spoke greek to give it an illusion of antiquity, much like the calendar we have today, which was established in the year 535 CE by Dionysus Exegesis so too was the original message altered to that of the pauline credo, a digestible religion to the yet to be converted greeks who had no desire to follow the mosaic laws. None of the disciples spoke of trinity, ate pork or proclaimed it is allowable to do so, yet the miracle begotten paul, whom peter called him enemy, introduced his new creed according to his whims, often boastful of his innovations he said " I was not a whit behind the very chiefest apostles." There is no passage in Paul inconsistent with these quotations; no passage suggesting that the admission of the gentiles into the Christian church was an idea of Jesus, or that it was accepted by the twelve apostles in Jerusalem before the conversion of Paul, or that he received any instruction from them or acknowledged any duty of obedience or submission to them. This gospel which Paul preached and which, according to his boast, was original with him, included many tenets not found in the four gospels or not set forth there in unmistakable terms. By implication, it repudiated the ascetic and communistic maxims of the synoptic gospels, It proclaimed the abrogation of the Mosaic ceremonial law. It proclaimed that the unsearchable riches of Christ were to be distributed as freely among the Gentiles as among the Jews. It announced itself as a new and independent religion; and popular speech recognized the correctness of the claim by calling its adherents Christians, and their doctrine Christianity.
Language; When one looks at the actual linguistics, one will find that many were puzzled by the opposite, that is, how the other "semetic" languages were more "evolved" than Arabic, while Arabic had archaic features, not only archaic compared to bibilical Hebrew, Ethiopic, "Aramaic" contemporary "semetic" languages, but even archaic compared to languages from ancient antiquity; Ugaritic, Akkadain. What is meant here by Archaic is not what most readers think, it is Archaic not in the sense that it is simple, but rather that it is complex (think Latin to pig Latin or Italian or Old English, which had genders and case endings to modern English), not only grammatically, but also phonetically; All the so called semitic languages are supposed to have evolved from protosemetic, the Alphabet for protosemitic is that of the so called Ancient South Arabian (which interestingly corresponds with the traditional Arabic origins account) and has 28 Phonemes. Arabic has 28 phonemes. Hebrew has 22, same as Aramaic, and other "semitic" languages. Now pause for a second and think about it, how come Arabic, a language that is supposed to have come so late has the same number of letters as a language that supposedly predates it by over a millennium (Musnad script ~1300 BCE). Not only is the glossary of phonemes more diverse than any other semitic language, but the grammar is more complex, containing more cases and retains what's linguists noted for its antiquity, broken plurals. Indeed, a linguist has once noted that if one were to take everything we know about languages and how they develop, Arabic is older than Akkadian (~2500 BCE).
Now how is it that the Qur'an came thousands of years later in an alphabet that had never been recorded before, and in the highest form the language had ever taken?
The creator is neither bound by time nor space, therefore the names are uttered as they truly were, in a language that is lexically, syntactically, phonemically, and semantically older than the oldest recorded writing. In fact, that writing appears to have been a simplified version of it. Not only that, but it would be the equivalent of the greatest works of any particular language all appearing in one book, in a perfect script and in the highest form the language could ever take. It is so high in fact, that it had yet to be surpassed despite the fact that over the last millennium the collection of Arabic manuscripts when compared on word-per-word basis in Western Museums alone, when they are compared with the collected Greek and Latin manuscripts combined, the latter does not constitute 1 percent of the former as per German professor Frank Griffel, in addition all in a script that had never been recorded before. Thus, the enlightenment of mankind from barbarism and savagery began, and the age of reason and rationality was born from its study.
God did bring down the Qur’an, Mohamed is his Messenger.
@@mznxbcv12345 No one is reading all of that devil script, #SamShamoun might interest you though.
I'm an atheist, but having read through the entire bible the dude who said that the word "chiristian" isnt found in the bible in simply wrong. It appear in two different new testament books; Acts and 1 Peter.
Christian is someone who follows christ kindly get this basic knowledge
@@user-nk8lp4ng8r You're not even talking about the same thing that I am. I said that the word Christian appears in the Bible, which it does. I never once tried to define the word Christian, so whatever you are angry about is completely unrelated to what I said.
Why is this video even a thing? I'm a muslim myself so i might be biased, but calling any religion false is just so stupid.
@@noobymooby-ty8gh As a Muslim don't you believe that all religions other than Islam are false?
@@noobymooby-ty8ghfreedom of speech.
The Danish scholar Patricia Crone wanted to write a book on Meccan trade leading up to the beginning of Islam, since Islam describes Mecca as a major trade route hub, the oldest place of human habitation on earth. She ran into a problem, namely, there is no evidence that Mecca existed until after Mohammed would have died. No trade documents, it's not on any maps until centuries after Islam is supposed to begun, it's not on any trade route. The place is more of a hole-in-the-wall, a robbers roost, a hiding place in the middle of nowhere.
We have no archaeological proof of Moses existence, and if he did exist we have no proof of when that might have been.
The only books that speak of Moses are the books of the Jews (then the books of the Christians and Muslims of course) and were written a long time after his supposed lifetime. Yet other local cultures, who generally liked to write and leave traces, have never spoken of a guy who led 2 million people across the sea and the desert. In fact, to go a step further, archaeology would tend to go against most of the information that's told about Moses, since it's often anacronistic, inaccurate or inconsistent with one another.
I guess all Abrahamic religions are false since archaeology can't prove the existence of the original prophet, right?
Nice fantasy , The name of Mecca is often claimed to be first recorded by the Greek geographer Ptolemy, who calls it Macoraba in the 2nd century AD.
However, this identification is not certain, and some scholars have argued that there are older accounts of Mecca than Ptolemy. For example, some have suggested that Mecca is mentioned in the Assyrian inscriptions of Tiglath-Pileser III (8th century BC) as Magan or Makan, a region ruled by the Arab queen Samsi. Others have proposed that Mecca is referred to in the Old Testament as Paran or Teman, places associated with Ishmael and his descendants. Still others have pointed out that Mecca is attested in some ancient South Arabian inscriptions as Makkah or Makkahum, meaning "temple" or "sanctuary".
One inscription from the 3rd century AD reads: "By ʿAthtar of Makkahum and by Almaqah of ʿAwwām and by Dhat-Ḥimyam and by Dhu-Samawi and by Dhat-Baʿdan. I am ʿAbd-Karib son of ʿAbd-Malik son of ʿAbd-Karib son of ʿAbd-Malik son of ʿAbd-Karib son of ʿAbd-Malik son of ʿAbd-Karib son of ʿAbd-Malik son of ʿAbd-Karib son of ʿAbd-Malik son of ʿAbd-Karib son of ʿAbd-Malik son of Ḥaṭṭab. I have made a vow to Makkahum for my life and for my children and for my clan." This inscription shows that Mecca was a place where people made vows and sought blessings from various gods.
Another inscription from the 4th century AD reads: "By Almaqah the lord and by Dhat-Ḥimyam and by Dhu-Samawi and by Dhat-Baʿdan. I am Ḥaṭṭab son of Ḥaṭṭab son of Ḥaṭṭab son of Ḥaṭṭab son of Ḥaṭṭab son of Ḥaṭṭab son of Ḥaṭṭab son of Ḥaṭṭab son of Ḥaṭṭab. I have given to Makkahum a gift: two camels with their saddles." This inscription shows that Mecca was a place where people gave gifts and donations to the temple. These inscriptions confirm that Mecca was a well-known and respected city in ancient South Arabia, and that its location was in the same valley surrounded by mountains as it is today.
Macoraba is not Mecca, nice try.
Greek has a limited ability of capturing Arabic it is infact Markorava (Μακόραβα) and not Macroba as is often localized Greek is known to morph to suit tongue of speakers, the word for Jesus as his name is often misspelled due to the lack of the ayin sound in Greek, which was rendered to Iesous, coupling the nearest sound to ayin, same letter found in 'Iraq', which sounds entirely different in Arabic form 'Iran' in Arabic, with the -ous Greek suffix that Greeks typically add to their names 'HerodotOS', 'PlotinUS', 'AchelOUS' and later mumbled into a J. The original is "Isa" as it is in the Quran Arabic.
The yeshua rendition of Isa (his name in the Qur'an) PBUH which is purported to be the name of Jesus is KNOWN to had been taken from greek. Western Syriac also use "Isho". Western Aramaic (separate from Syriac which is a dialect of Eastern Aramaic) use "Yeshu". Western Syriac has been separate from Western Aramaic for about 1000 years. And sounds don't even match up. Syriac is a Christian liturgical language yet the four letters of the name of Jesus «ܝܫܘܥ» [ = Judeo-Babylonian Aramaic: «ישוע» ] sounds totally different in West vs East Syriac, viz. vocalized akin to Christian Arabic, Hebrew, Aramaic «ܝܶܫܽܘܥ» (Yēšūʿ) in West Syriac, but pronounced more akin to Muslim Arabic Quran character name Isa in East Syriac «ܝܑܼܫܘܿܥ» (ʾĪšōʿ). The reason for this confusion is their dropping of phonemes as aforementioned. Only someone that has no idea what the letters are or how they sound would have a name ending in a pharyngeal fricative like the ayin, if it were to be used in a name it would have had to be in the beginning, thus the Arabic rendition is the correct one.
In addition, The word God in hebrew is eloah, is a cognate of the Arabic I-L-H, pronounced ilah not eloah. Hebrew dropped the glottal stop and mumbled it into eloh, aramic mumbled a little less and it became elah. Infact it is written A-L-H in Arabic, it is pronounced i in Arabic cause it is an Alef with hamza below (إ أ ) They are two different forms of Alef.
And it mean "a god", it is the non definitive form of A-L-L-H, in which the Alef is without a glottal stop/hamza,(ا)
Schlözer in his preparation for the Arabia expedition in 1781 coined the term Semitic language:
"From the Mediterranean to the Euphrates, from Mesopotamia to Arabia ruled one language, as is well known. Thus Syrians, Babylonians, Hebrews, and Arabs were one people (ein Volk). Phoenicians (Hamites) also spoke this language, which I would like to call the Semitic (die Semitische)."
-Before Boas: The Genesis of Ethnography and Ethnology in the German By Han F. Vermeulen
He was only half right though, Arabic is the only corollary to "proto-semitic", infact the whole semitic classification is nonsensical for anyone with a somewhat functioning mass between their ears. hebrew, aramaic, rest of madeup dialect continua only have 22 letters of the 29 protosemitic letters Arabic has all 29. The difference betweeen Arabic and the other creoles and Pidgin is the same as that between Latin and pig latin or italian.
"protosemetic" Alphabet (29), Arabic Alphabet (28), Latin transliteration, hebrew (22)
𐩠 𐩡 𐩢 𐩣 𐩤 𐩥 𐩦 𐩧 𐩨 𐩩 𐩪 𐩫 𐩬 𐩭 𐩮 𐩰 𐩱 𐩲 𐩳 𐩴 𐩵 𐩶 𐩷 𐩸 𐩹 𐩺 𐩻 𐩼
ا ب ت ث ج ح خ د ذ ر ز س ش ص ض ط ظ ع غ ف ق ك ل م ن ه و ي
A b t ṯ j h kh d ḏ r z s sh ṣ ḍ ṭ ẓ ʿ ġ f q k l m n h w y
א ב ג ד ה ו ז ח ט י כ ל מ נ ס ע פ צ ק ר ש ת
Merged phonemes in hebrew and aramaic:
ح, خ (h, kh) merged into only kh consonant remain
س, ش (s, sh) merged into only Shin consonant remaining
ط, ظ (ṭ/teth, ẓ) merged into only ṭ/teth consonant remaining
ص, ض (ṣ, ḍ/Tsad ) merged into only ḍ/Tsad consonant remaining
ع, غ (3'ayn, Ghayn) merged into a reducted ayin consonant remaining
ت, ث (t/taw, th) merged into only t/taw consonant remaining
This kind of nuance is lost in the dialect continua. As a matter of fact, all of the knowledge needed for deciphering ancient texts and their complexity was derived from the Qur'an. It was by analyzing the syntactic structure of the Qur'an that the Arabic root system was developed. This system was first attested to in Kitab Al-Ayin, the first intralanguage dictionary of its kind, which preceded the Oxford English dictionary by 800 years. It was through this development that the concept of Arabic roots was established and later co-opted into the term 'semitic root,' allowing the decipherment of ancient scripts. In essence, they quite literally copied and pasted the entirety of the Arabic root. Hebrew had been dead, as well as all the other dialects of Arabic, until being 'revived' in a Frankensteinian fashion in the 18th and 19th centuries.
The entire region spoke basically the same language, with mumbled dialect continuums spread about, and Arabic is the oldest form from which all these dialects branched off. As time passed, the language gradually became more degenerate, and then the Qur'an appeared with the oldest possible form of the language thousands of years later. This is why the Arabs of that time were challenged to produce 10 similar verses, and they couldn't. People think it's a miracle because they couldn't do it, but I think the miracle is the language itself. They had never spoken Arabic, nor has any other language before or since had this mathematical precision. And when I say mathematical, I quite literally mean mathematical.
|Classical Arabic | 28 consonants, 29 with Hamza and 6 vowels; some consonants are emphatic or pharyngealized; some vowels are marked with diacritics | Complex system of word formation based on roots and patterns; roots are sequences of consonants that carry the basic meaning of a word; patterns are sequences of vowels and affixes that modify the meaning and function of a word | Flexible word order, but VSO is most common; SVO is also possible; subject and object are marked by case endings (-u for nominative, -a for accusative, -i for genitive); verb agrees with subject in person, number, and gender; verb has different forms for different moods and aspects |
| Akkadian | 22 consonants and 3 vowels; some consonants are glottalized or palatalized; vowels are not marked | Similar system, but with different roots and patterns; some roots have more than three consonants; some patterns have infixes or reduplication | Fixed word order of SVO; subject and object are not marked by case endings, but by prepositions or word order; verb agrees with subject in person, number, and gender; verb has different forms for different tenses and aspects |
| Aramaic | 22 consonants and 3 vowels (later variants have more); no emphatic or pharyngealized consonants (except in some dialects); vowels are not marked (except in later variants such as Syriac) | Simple system of word formation based on prefixes and suffixes; some roots or patterns exist, but are less productive than in Arabic or Akkadian |
Classical Arabic has more consonants and vowels than other semitic languages, and that it preserves some sounds that were lost or changed in other semitic languages. This means that classical Arabic can encode more information in a given unit of speech than other semitic languages, and that it is closer to the original sound system of protosemitic., we can see that classical Arabic has more grammatical features than the other languages, such as case endings, mood endings, and root and pattern system. These features make classical Arabic more expressive and precise than the other languages, as it can convey more information and nuances in a single word or phrase. Classical Arabic is also more flexible than the other languages, as it can use different word orders and verb forms to emphasize different aspects of the sentence. Classical Arabic is therefore older and more original than the other languages, it is the language of Adam.
Now how is it that the Qur'an came thousands of years later in an alphabet that had never been recorded before, and in the highest form the language had ever taken?
The creator is neither bound by time nor space, therefore the names are uttered as they truly were, in a language that is lexically, syntactically, phonemically, and semantically older than the oldest recorded writing. In fact, that writing appears to have been a simplified version of it. Not only that, but it would be the equivalent of the greatest works of any particular language all appearing in one book, in a perfect script and in the highest form the language could ever take. It is so high in fact, that it had yet to be surpassed despite the fact that over the last millennium the collection of Arabic manuscripts when compared on word-per-word basis in Western Museums alone, when they are compared with the collected Greek and Latin manuscripts combined, the latter does not constitute 1 percent of the former as per German professor Frank Griffel, in addition all in a script that had never been recorded before. Thus, the enlightenment of mankind from barbarism and savagery began, and the age of reason and rationality was born from its study.
To show the relation between Arabic and other "semitic" language, another Aramaic word for God is Alaha . Sounds familiar? Written without the confusing vowels, it is A-L-H ܐ ܠܗܐ (alap-lamed-he) as found in Targum or in Tanakh (Daniel, Ezra), Syriac Aramaic (Peshitta), reducted from the Arabic original (of which Aramaic is a dialect continuum) 'A-L-L-H' (Aleph-Lam-Lam-Ha). Add another A before the H for vocalization.
To illustrate,
Let's start with a simple sentence:
## The house is big
Arabic:
البيتُ كبيرٌ
al-bayt-u kabīr-un
Proto-Semitic:
*ʔal-bayt-u kabīr-u
Hebrew:
הבית גדול
ha-bayit gadol
Akkadian:
bītum rabûm
Amharic:
ቤቱ ገደሉ
betu gedelu
As can be seen, Arabic and Proto-Semitic have the same word order (noun-adjective), the same definite article (al-), and the same case endings (-u for nominative). Hebrew and Akkadian have lost the case endings and changed the definite article (ha- and -um respectively). Amharic has changed the word order (adjective-noun) and the definite article (u-).
But Arabic is not only similar to Proto-Semitic, it is also pre-Semitic, meaning that it is the original form of Semitic before it split into different branches. This is because Arabic preserves many features that are not found in any other Semitic language, but are found in other Afro-Asiatic languages, such as Egyptian and Berber. These features include:
- The definite article al-, which is derived from the demonstrative pronoun *ʔal- 'that'. This article is unique to Arabic among Semitic languages, but it is similar to the article n- in Berber and the article p-, t-, n- in Egyptian.
- The dual number for nouns and verbs, which is marked by the suffix -ān or -ayn. This number is rare in other Semitic languages, but it is common in other Afro-Asiatic languages, such as Egyptian and Berber.
- The imperfective prefix t- for verbs, which indicates the second person singular feminine or third person plural feminine. This prefix is unique to Arabic among Semitic languages, but it is similar to the prefix t- in Berber and Egyptian.
- The passive voice for verbs, which is marked by the infix t between the first and second root consonants. This voice is unique to Arabic among Semitic languages, but it is similar to the passive voice in Egyptian and Berber.
Finally, a more complex sentence: The letter was written with a pen.
Arabic:
كُتِبَتِ الرِّسَالَةُ بِالقَلَمِ
kutiba-t al-risāla-t-u bi-l-qalam-i
Proto-Semitic:
*kutiba-t ʔal-risāla-t-u bi-l-qalam-i
Hebrew:
המכתב נכתב בעט
ha-michtav niktav ba-et
Akkadian:
šipram šapāru bēlum
Egyptian:
sḏm.n.f p-ẖry m rnp.t
Berber:
tturra-t tibratin s uccen
Here, Arabic and Proto-Semitic have the same word order (verb-subject-object), the same passive voice marker (-t-), the same definite article (al-), and the same preposition (bi-). Hebrew has changed the word order (subject-verb-object), lost the passive voice marker, changed the definite article (ha-) and the preposition (ba-). Akkadian has changed the word order (object-subject-verb), lost the passive voice marker, changed the definite article (-um) and the preposition (bēlum).
Language; When you look at the actual linguistics, you'll find that many were puzzled by the opposite, that is, how the other "semetic" (why in quotes will be revealed later) languages were more "evolved" than Arabic, while Arabic had archaic features, not only archaic compared to bibilical Hebrew, Ethiopic, "Aramaic" contemporary "semetic" languages, but even archaic compared to languages from ancient antiquity; Ugaritic, Akkadain. What is meant here by Archaic is not what most readers think, it is Archaic not in the sense that it is simple, but rather that it is complex (think Latin to pig Latin or Italian or Old English, which had genders and case endings to modern English), not only grammatically, but also phonetically; All the so called semitic languages are supposed to have evolved from protosemetic, the Alphabet for protosemitic is that of the so called Ancient South Arabian (which interestingly corresponds with the traditional Arabic origins account) and has 28 Phonemes. Arabic has 28 phonemes. Hebrew has 22, same as Aramaic, and other "semitic" languages. Now pause for a second and think about it, how come Arabic, a language that is supposed to have come so late has the same number of letters as a language that supposedly predates it by over a millennium (Musnad script ~1300 BCE). Not only is the glossary of phonemes more diverse than any other semitic language, but the grammar is more complex, containing more cases and retains what's linguists noted for its antiquity, broken plurals. Indeed, a linguist has once noted that if one were to take everything we know about languages and how they develop, Arabic is older than Akkadian (~2500 BCE).
Now how is it that the Qur'an came thousands of years in a language that is lexically, syntactically, phonemically, and semantically older than the oldest recorded writing?
God did bring down the Qur’an, Mohamed is his Messenger.
The story is simple, really, if you look at it. Jesus was tempted in the desert by Lucifer, and he rebuked him. Then later on, Muhammad was tempted by Lucifer.And they made a deal.
He was forced and strangled by a false angel in a cave 😂
he got a revelation like all others prophets. Not a dream like Paul or John are trying to use a reliable source of information.
@@hiraplay612 he got nearly killed and fled in terror from the cave that isnt a revelation
@@hiraplay612 550 years after Christ. Also the original manuscripts on hide were altered multiple times. By the Qurans definition, that makes it fraudulent and invalid.
Every single prophet was afraid after seeing Gabriel@@josiahbundy-yl4yk
Somebody said Jesus was Muslim because Mary wore a hijab😭 Hijab is the Arabic word for Veil, and people wore veils LONG before islam
Tell that guy that he is being stupid
May Allah guide you
@@G06LlN maly allah guide your wife to me
@@groundzero5708 may Allah guide your daughter into my bed
Jesus is Muslim because he submitted to god. The definition of a Muslim is one who submits to god.
Let me correct this a little bit because some people are confused.
The word “Islam” means “submission to the will of God.” Followers of Islam are called Muslims. Muslims are monotheistic and worship one, all-knowing God, who in Arabic is known as Allah. Followers of Islam aim to live a life of complete submission to Allah.
Jesus was a muslim because he submitted to the one true god, the father. He wasn’t a god, the holy spirit wasn’t a god. That’s what we muslims believe.
Like all prophets in Islam, Jesus is also called a Muslim, as he preached that his followers should adopt the 'straight path' (Ṣirāṭ al-Mustaqīm). Jesus is attributed with a vast number of miracles in Islamic tradition.
@@Fred61378Jesus was Jewish
To all ex-muslim,how many raakat in Suratul Fatihah?
What do you mean by this question? Sourat fatiha is part of the rakaa not the opposite.
@@hdxls-jx7lt No, We pray the voluntary prayer called "moos iyo bariis". didnt u use to pray that ?
@@Phantom.est.2006it's no use man everytime I talk with a Christian they don't even come up with REAL arguments and all they say Mohammed pbuh married Aesha when she was 6 years old ;-;
@@nikel_gamer9604 true, I have realized that they never say anything about the Quran. Only the hadiths.
@@Phantom.est.2006 and this particular Hadith isn't really trusted by many scholars too
The "new" Muslims movement on youtube literally devolves into r/atheist arguments
because in the end there will only islam and atheism. it's in islamic eschatology.
@@begobolehsjwjangan2359 "We're just gonna kill em!" ~ Prophet Muhammad (PBUH)
@@begobolehsjwjangan2359 No, it'll be Islam, Christianity, and the followers of the anti-Christ. We actually believe some Christians (not all) will be on the good guy side. But when Jesus returns the Christians will become Muslim.
@@begobolehsjwjangan2359Which means Islam by itself can’t stand so had to use kafir arguments to try and debunk Christianity which in turn just as well debunks their entire religion since in their own book, it relies on the Bible for its authenticity of passing down this “continuity” of prophecy (Sura 5.66, 5.68 as blatant examples). It is easy to see the fraud Muhammad was.
@@begobolehsjwjangan2359😂😂lol not .there arguments about atheist are so dumped
Wherever Islam goes, mayhem and violence follows.
When ever someone follows you they get to the adoption centre.
With great religion comes great misconceptions
Bro Islam has more truth than christianity 💀 also has no mistake at all
Unlike Christianity. Shut up
Let's talk about Christianity has the highest crime rate ☠️
So what about Jews then?
I was going to watch this but then I realized I just missed Asr. Thank you Kyle for reminding me! 😊
True, bro. I am going to pray now.
Ramadan Kareem guys!
alhamdhulillah
😂😂 شيكور وليد بلادي 😂😂
I left Islam. after watching this video
Am I hearing things or did I hear Death Note music?? 😆 great content
Prophet Muhammad: “Trust me bro”
Joseph Smith: “Trust me bro”
Yeah but Paul can be trusted 😂
@@CristianoRonaldo-li9gu how
Bro y'all should know this, dr zakir stated in muhammad in hinduism scripture video that muhammad is muhammadi from vhabisya purana that totally a demon being who get incarnate to create a demonic religion in this world, LIKE HE SHOULD GO TO JAIL FOR ISLAMOPHOBIA, BRO ADMITED HIS OWN RELIGION IS DEMONIC LIKE HOW? 😂
I am wondering if you would still say that on the day of judgement..
Paul: "Trust me bro"
I love how this guy literally uses legitimate sources, even their fkn own sources like quran and hadith, compares and shows just plain stupidity it just flies over muslims head. Like wtf is wrong with them? They always do this for example their own source Bukhari says Aysha was 6 and they go like "no, she was actually 19 🤓👆" without ever proving how she was 19 lmaooo
It's like Hegel
@@MrMilanistaSwe do your own research pleaaaaase
Have shame
She was. My “French” grandmother (who was a Christian at that time) married my grandfather when she was 9, this was less than a 100 years ago… what’s your point bud? The prophet pbuh married women of different ages (one was older than him, and one was his age) he didn’t only marry “kids” PLEASE get educated before throwing your bs.
It’s so sad how HARD you people try
And honestly you agreeing with this Kyle dude’s logic makes so much sense
Keep believing your god knows who the hell is “Paul” lol🤡
I almost converted to Islam once upon a time.
I was disenchanted with Protestant Christianity (being raised as a not particularly devout AME (African Methodist Episcopal)) and the hollowness and logical inconsistencies of atheism, especially the edge lord anti-thiestic atheism of the early-mid 2000s during my teenage years.
I was fortunate enough to go to a good high-school with a diverse student body, and one of my best friends in high school was a Sunni Muslim with family from Egypt. We used to get in all sorts of discussions about all kinds of topics, and he and his family impressed me with his intelligence, manners and hospitality. There were these two Muslim twins I used to hang out with back then too and they were REALLY smart, easily a few grade levels above the average class at the time. Their families were from Pakistan, I think.
Later when I went to university, my politics were moving towards a more anarcho-syndicalism libertarian leftism, and I met up with students who were anti-Zionist, and many of them were Muslim, so I became pals with some of them. I bought a Quran and Hadith and started reading, as I was all over the place at the time. I was doing yoga and kundalini exercises regularly and reading Hindu and Buddhist sutras, existentialist philosophy, Zen Buddhist treatises, etc. I didn't commit to Islam at the time, because I was still deeply skeptical of explicit religious claims.
Long story short (were talking 10-15 years now), after going to two Buddhist silent meditation retreats and watching our world crumble before my eyes, slowly but surely I'm coming to realize the sheer importance and magnificence of Christ and the the church that immediately followed his earthly sojourn. I have friends and acquaintances today who are Muslim, Zen Buddhist, Hindu, Jewish, etc., but these systems and philosophies don't seem to compare to Christ and what he left for the world.
(Oh and the fact that my father (RIP/Memory Eternal) was a member of the NATION OF ISLAM back in the day, but that's a whole other story.)
Me too, I thought that Islam is nice and almost wanted to convert because of the lies of Muslim people on tiktok saying that Islam destroyed racism without mentioning the slave trade that was continued in Islamic nations even after 1800
same bruv
Buddha soothes me and Jesus comforts me. I find both infinitely glorious and complementary, Buddha is man who becomes God and Jesus is God who becomes man.
They both follow parallel paths, with Buddha one attains love through wisdom, with Jesus one attains wisdom through love. They are the 2 lights of the world, the 2 paths that lead to the foot of the sun.
@@Maitatron I'm sorry but you can't serve two masters, either you will hate one and loved the other. Any religion that you can lie to yourself into thinking that you can be pious enough that God will owe you something can not be the true path to God. Jesus is the King that goes infront of His troops as all others makes you fight on the frontline.
Nation of Islam is Mormonism for Black People.
I have already read surat Al kafirun, thank God.
why is bro 50 all of the sudden 😭great video kyle
Its like watching watching to dungeon masters explain which dnd setting is the best haha. This was very informative as a non religious person!
Went to my first ever Divine Liturgy with my family on Christmas. My parents are devout Catholics and I have told them about my desire to switch to Orthodoxy and thankfully they have been very supportive since they know that Orthodoxy was there since the beginning and has valid apostolic succession like RC does. My family and I really enjoyed the experience at the church, even if the church itself was pretty tiny and not as intricate, organized, or decorated as the larger, more popular churches. The incense was amazing and a brand new scent for us, the singing of the majority of what was said was amazing and the priest gave an amazing sermon that made my dad tear up. I am now set on my decision to switch to Orthodoxy, but unfortunately i don’t believe it will happen anytime soon until sometime in the future since the nearest Orthodox Church is an hour away and I work on Sundays and have school on weekdays in another city. Thank you Kyle for all your information and help and God bless! ☦️
Glad to hear you found the try church. But remember my brother just a small correction on what you said. RC does not have valid succession like us. They are cut off from God and are no longer part of the apostolic succession.
True church**
@@OrthoNektariosoh really? I assumed that they still had valid succession since Rome was one of the original 5 churches
As a Catholic I really do not understand the conversations to orthodoxy when we obviously already have the fullness of faith/truth
@@matheussalim5652 for me, it’s the issue of a pope being infallible and supreme over all other bishops, especially when it’s a bad one like pope Francis, the resurrection sculpture in the Vatican audience hall, the need for a tradcath movement since some of the past few popes and the Vatican 2 council have actively been trying to destroy and replace the traditional Latin mass with clown masses and whatnot, all the innovations and additions Rome added without conversing with the other 4 churches, and romes arrogance in trying to assert control over the others, and most importantly the sack of Constantinople done by Catholic crusaders against the Orthodox empire, the only empire holding back the muslim forces from expanding into most of the Middle East, that make me want to switch to Orthodoxy
0:01 is absolutely diabolical💀
Bobby literally debunked the whole video
BOY LOOK
IS THE AHH WHO SAID I DIED FOR YOUR SINS
Verses from the Old Testament
1. Isaiah 9:6:
• “For to us a child is born, to us a son is given, and the government will be on his shoulders. And he will be called Wonderful Counselor, Mighty God, Everlasting Father, Prince of Peace.”
• Explanation: This verse is a prophecy about the coming Messiah, who Christians believe is Jesus. The titles “Mighty God” and “Everlasting Father” point to the divine nature of this child, suggesting that the Messiah would not be a mere human but God incarnate.
2. Micah 5:2:
• “But you, Bethlehem Ephrathah, though you are small among the clans of Judah, out of you will come for me one who will be ruler over Israel, whose origins are from of old, from ancient times.”
• Explanation: This verse is another prophecy about the Messiah, who is described as having origins “from of old, from ancient times,” which many Christians interpret as an indication of the eternal nature of the Messiah, pointing to His divinity.
Verses from the New Testament
1. John 1:1-3, 14:
• “In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God. He was with God in the beginning. Through him all things were made; without him nothing was made that has been made. … The Word became flesh and made his dwelling among us. We have seen his glory, the glory of the one and only Son, who came from the Father, full of grace and truth.”
• Explanation: These verses clearly identify Jesus (referred to as “the Word”) as God and the Creator. Verse 14 confirms that this Word became flesh, identifying Jesus as God incarnate.
2. John 8:58:
• “Very truly I tell you,” Jesus answered, “before Abraham was born, I am!”
• Explanation: Here, Jesus uses the divine name “I am” (Greek: ego eimi), which directly echoes God’s self-identification in Exodus 3:14 (“I AM WHO I AM”). This statement was understood by His contemporaries as a claim to divinity, which is why they attempted to stone Him for blasphemy immediately after this statement (John 8:59).
3. Colossians 2:9:
• “For in Christ all the fullness of the Deity lives in bodily form,”
• Explanation: This verse explicitly states that Jesus possesses the fullness of the divine nature, affirming His identity as God.
4. Titus 2:13:
• “while we wait for the blessed hope-the appearing of the glory of our great God and Savior, Jesus Christ,”
• Explanation: Paul refers to Jesus as “our great God and Savior,” a clear declaration of His divinity.
Common Muslim Arguments Against the Divinity of Jesus
Muslims generally reject the divinity of Jesus, and they base their arguments on several points:
1. Jesus’ Humanity and Servanthood:
• Muslims often point to verses in the Bible where Jesus is depicted as a man who eats, sleeps, and prays, such as Luke 2:52, where Jesus grows in wisdom and stature, and John 14:28, where Jesus says, “The Father is greater than I.” These verses emphasize Jesus’ human nature and His role as a servant of God.
2. The Shema and Monotheism:
• Muslims argue that the Shema, a central declaration of Jewish faith found in Deuteronomy 6:4 (“Hear, O Israel: The Lord our God, the Lord is one.”), emphasizes the oneness of God. They believe that the concept of the Trinity contradicts this fundamental monotheism, interpreting it as polytheism.
3. Prophethood of Jesus:
• In Islam, Jesus (Isa in Arabic) is regarded as one of the greatest prophets, but not divine. The Qur’an teaches that Jesus was a human prophet who performed miracles by God’s permission but never claimed divinity. Muslims often cite verses like John 17:3, where Jesus refers to the Father as the “only true God,” as evidence that Jesus Himself did not consider Himself God.
4. Jesus’ Knowledge and Power:
• Muslims highlight verses where Jesus appears to have limited knowledge (e.g., Mark 13:32, where Jesus says He does not know the hour of the end times) or where He prays to God (e.g., Matthew 26:39). These instances are interpreted as evidence that Jesus was subordinate to God and therefore not divine.
Christian Responses to These Arguments
1. Hypostatic Union:
• Christians believe in the hypostatic union, which teaches that Jesus is fully God and fully man. This means that while Jesus has a human nature with its limitations, He also possesses a divine nature. Therefore, when Jesus prays or expresses limited knowledge, He is doing so in His humanity, not His divinity.
2. Trinity as Unity:
• The Christian doctrine of the Trinity maintains that God is one in essence but exists in three persons: Father, Son, and Holy Spirit. The Shema’s declaration of God’s oneness is not seen as contradictory to the Trinity, but rather it underscores the unity of God’s being.
3. Jesus’ Statements of Divinity:
• Christians point out that Jesus made several claims to divinity, such as in John 10:30 (“I and the Father are one”) and through His miracles and authority over life and death (e.g., John 11:25-26). These affirmations are seen as consistent with the understanding that Jesus is God.
@@Zidane-is-the-GOAT05
@@rafiramzihenkaja3251 Verses from the Old Testament
1. Isaiah 9:6:
• “For to us a child is born, to us a son is given, and the government will be on his shoulders. And he will be called Wonderful Counselor, Mighty God, Everlasting Father, Prince of Peace.”
• Explanation: This verse is a prophecy about the coming Messiah, who Christians believe is Jesus. The titles “Mighty God” and “Everlasting Father” point to the divine nature of this child, suggesting that the Messiah would not be a mere human but God incarnate.
2. Micah 5:2:
• “But you, Bethlehem Ephrathah, though you are small among the clans of Judah, out of you will come for me one who will be ruler over Israel, whose origins are from of old, from ancient times.”
• Explanation: This verse is another prophecy about the Messiah, who is described as having origins “from of old, from ancient times,” which many Christians interpret as an indication of the eternal nature of the Messiah, pointing to His divinity.
Verses from the New Testament
1. John 1:1-3, 14:
• “In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God. He was with God in the beginning. Through him all things were made; without him nothing was made that has been made. … The Word became flesh and made his dwelling among us. We have seen his glory, the glory of the one and only Son, who came from the Father, full of grace and truth.”
• Explanation: These verses clearly identify Jesus (referred to as “the Word”) as God and the Creator. Verse 14 confirms that this Word became flesh, identifying Jesus as God incarnate.
2. John 8:58:
• “Very truly I tell you,” Jesus answered, “before Abraham was born, I am!”
• Explanation: Here, Jesus uses the divine name “I am” (Greek: ego eimi), which directly echoes God’s self-identification in Exodus 3:14 (“I AM WHO I AM”). This statement was understood by His contemporaries as a claim to divinity, which is why they attempted to stone Him for blasphemy immediately after this statement (John 8:59).
3. Colossians 2:9:
• “For in Christ all the fullness of the Deity lives in bodily form,”
• Explanation: This verse explicitly states that Jesus possesses the fullness of the divine nature, affirming His identity as God.
4. Titus 2:13:
• “while we wait for the blessed hope-the appearing of the glory of our great God and Savior, Jesus Christ,”
• Explanation: Paul refers to Jesus as “our great God and Savior,” a clear declaration of His divinity.
Common Muslim Arguments Against the Divinity of Jesus
Muslims generally reject the divinity of Jesus, and they base their arguments on several points:
1. Jesus’ Humanity and Servanthood:
• Muslims often point to verses in the Bible where Jesus is depicted as a man who eats, sleeps, and prays, such as Luke 2:52, where Jesus grows in wisdom and stature, and John 14:28, where Jesus says, “The Father is greater than I.” These verses emphasize Jesus’ human nature and His role as a servant of God.
2. The Shema and Monotheism:
• Muslims argue that the Shema, a central declaration of Jewish faith found in Deuteronomy 6:4 (“Hear, O Israel: The Lord our God, the Lord is one.”), emphasizes the oneness of God. They believe that the concept of the Trinity contradicts this fundamental monotheism, interpreting it as polytheism.
3. Prophethood of Jesus:
• In Islam, Jesus (Isa in Arabic) is regarded as one of the greatest prophets, but not divine. The Qur’an teaches that Jesus was a human prophet who performed miracles by God’s permission but never claimed divinity. Muslims often cite verses like John 17:3, where Jesus refers to the Father as the “only true God,” as evidence that Jesus Himself did not consider Himself God.
4. Jesus’ Knowledge and Power:
• Muslims highlight verses where Jesus appears to have limited knowledge (e.g., Mark 13:32, where Jesus says He does not know the hour of the end times) or where He prays to God (e.g., Matthew 26:39). These instances are interpreted as evidence that Jesus was subordinate to God and therefore not divine.
Christian Responses to These Arguments
1. Hypostatic Union:
• Christians believe in the hypostatic union, which teaches that Jesus is fully God and fully man. This means that while Jesus has a human nature with its limitations, He also possesses a divine nature. Therefore, when Jesus prays or expresses limited knowledge, He is doing so in His humanity, not His divinity.
2. Trinity as Unity:
• The Christian doctrine of the Trinity maintains that God is one in essence but exists in three persons: Father, Son, and Holy Spirit. The Shema’s declaration of God’s oneness is not seen as contradictory to the Trinity, but rather it underscores the unity of God’s being.
3. Jesus’ Statements of Divinity:
• Christians point out that Jesus made several claims to divinity, such as in John 10:30 (“I and the Father are one”) and through His miracles and authority over life and death (e.g., John 11:25-26). These affirmations are seen as consistent with the understanding that Jesus is God.
@@Mane-er2rc Thank you
20:50
I'm not an Arab Christian, but I get what you mean. It's like Arab idolatry. I've literally met Ethiopian Muslims who would deny they are black but claim to be Arab. Very strange, very strange.
Some somalis get offended when you call them black. Baffles me.
Shup up infidel arabs are the best because allah chose arabic. Also our perfect human rasolullah is arab
In Holy Quran 2:261,And remember when Abraham said, ‘My Lord, show me how Thou givest life to the dead.’ He said, ‘Hast thou not believe?’ He said, ‘Yes, but I ask this so that my heart may be at rest.’ He answered, ‘Take four birds and make them attached to thyself. Then put each of them on a hill; then call them; they will come to thee in haste. And know that Allah is Mighty and Wise.’
Besides the afterlife, there is reference to 4 nations that shall rise and fall in ways know to Allah:
1. Nabi Musa was a Great law- bearing Prophet sent for the tribes of Israel with commandments and verities of wisdom that was suited for the Children of Israel at that stage of spiritual and physical requirements.
2. Prophet Isa (Jesus’ peace be upon Him) was the Messiah sent by God to guide the various Tribes of Israel according to the true teachings of the Torah and with the Gospel. He came about 1300 years after Prophet Musa.
3. The Holy Prophet Muhammed is the Last Great law -bearing prophet sent for the whole of mankind with blessings of spiritual guidance and signaling physical/ economic/ secular/technological blessings.
4. The Promised Messiah Nabi Ahmad was sent by God to guide people to the true teachings of the Holy Quran. In the time of the Promised Messiah there are various spiritual blessings and signaling physical/secular/economic/technological blessings. He arrived about 1300 years after the Holy Prophet.
@@chriss2452 theyre more culturally arab than they are "black" and their genes also have a lot of arab admixture due to 1,000+ years of interbreeding with arabs.
The Aramaic word for God is "Alaha". It's the word Isa PBUH used. Sounds familiar?
Written without the confusing vowels it is written A-L-H ܐ ܠܗܐ (alap-lamed-he) as found in Targum or in Tanakh (Daniel, Ezra), Syriac Aramaic (Peshitta), reduced from the Arabic original (of which Aramaic is a dialect continuum as will be explained) it is written in the Arabic script 'A-L-L-H' (Aleph-Lam-Lam-Ha) add an A before the last H for vocalization.
The word God in another rendition in Hebrew ʾĕlōah is derived from a base ʾilāh, an Arabic word, written without confusing vowel it is A-L-H in the Arabic script, pronounced ilah not eloah. Hebrew dropped the glottal stop and mumbled it, aramic mumbled a little less and it became elaha. Infact both are written written A-L-H in Arabic, it is pronounced i in Arabic and not A because it is an Alef with hamza below (إ أ ) They are two different forms of Alef. And it mean "a god", it is the non definitive form of A-L-L-H, in which the Alef is without a glottal stop/hamza,(ا), but this kind of nuance is lost in the dialect continua.
infact "YHWH" itself is an Arabic word as discussed by Professor. Israel Knohl (Professor of Biblical studies at the Hebrew University of Jerusalem) in the paper" YHWH: The Original Arabic Meaning of the Name."
jesus as his name is often misspelled due to the lack of the ayin sound in Greek, which was rendered to Iesous, coupling the nearest sound to ayin, same letter found in 'Iraq', which sounds entirely different in Arabic form 'Iran' in Arabic, with the -ous Greek suffix that Greeks typically add to their names 'HerodotOS', 'PlotinUS', 'AchelOUS' and later mumbled into a J. The yeshua rendition of Isa (his name in the Qur'an) PBUH which is purported to be the name of Jesus is KNOWN to had been taken from greek. Western Syriac also use "Isho". Western Aramaic (separate from Syriac which is a dialect of Eastern Aramaic) use "Yeshu". Western Syriac has been separate from Western Aramaic for about 1000 years. And sounds don't even match up. Syriac is a Christian liturgical language yet the four letters of the name of Jesus «ܝܫܘܥ» [ = Judeo-Babylonian Aramaic: «ישוע» ] sounds totally different in West vs East Syriac, viz. vocalized akin to Christian Arabic, Hebrew, Aramaic «ܝܶܫܽܘܥ» (Yēšūʿ) in West Syriac, but pronounced more akin to Muslim Arabic Quran character name Isa in East Syriac «ܝܑܼܫܘܿܥ» (ʾĪšōʿ). The reason for this confusion is their dropping of phonemes. Only someone that has no idea what the letters are or how they sound would have a name ending in a pharyngeal fricative like the ayin, if it were to be used in a name it would have had to be in the beginning, thus the Arabic rendition is the correct one. An example in English is how the appended -d is a common error amongst the English pronouncing Gaelic names. The name Donald arose from a common English mispronunciation of the Gaelic name Donal. Just how it is with donal becoming donald and the two becoming distinct and the original being regarded as something seperate so too did Isa PBUH turn to Iesous turn to jesus and when they tried going back to the original they confused it for yeshua ( ysu is how it is actually written) for Isa PBUH ( 3'eysah )
Schlözer in his preparation for the Arabia expedition in 1781 coined the term Semitic language:
"From the Mediterranean to the Euphrates, from Mesopotamia to Arabia ruled one language, as is well known. Thus Syrians, Babylonians, Hebrews, and Arabs were one people (ein Volk). Phoenicians (Hamites) also spoke this language, which I would like to call the Semitic (die Semitische)." -Before Boas: The Genesis of Ethnography and Ethnology in the German By Han F. Vermeulen.
He was only half right though, Arabic is the only corollary to "proto-semitic", infact the whole semitic classification is nonsensical as will be shown.
"protosemetic" Alphabet (28), Arabic Alphabet (28), Latin transliteration, hebrew (22)
𐩠 𐩡 𐩢 𐩣 𐩤 𐩥 𐩦 𐩧 𐩨 𐩩 𐩪 𐩫 𐩬 𐩭 𐩮 𐩰 𐩱 𐩲 𐩳 𐩴 𐩵 𐩶 𐩷 𐩸 𐩹 𐩺 𐩻 𐩼
ا ب ت ث ج ح خ د ذ ر ز س ش ص ض ط ظ ع غ ف ق ك ل م ن ه و ي
A b t ṯ j h kh d ḏ r z s sh ṣ ḍ ṭ ẓ ʿ ġ f q k l m n h w y
א ב ג ד ה ו ז ח ט י כ ל מ נ ס ע פ צ ק ר ש ת
Merged phonemes in hebrew and aramaic:
ح, خ (h, kh) merged into only kh consonant remain
س, ش (s, sh) merged into only Shin consonant remaining
ط, ظ (ṭ/teth, ẓ) merged into only ṭ/teth consonant remaining
ص, ض (ṣ, ḍ/Tsad ) merged into only ḍ/Tsad consonant remaining
ع, غ (3'ayn, Ghayn) merged into a reducted ayin consonant remaining
ت, ث (t/taw, th) merged into only t/taw consonant remaining
The reason why the protoS alphabet here is 28 and not 29, is because the supposed extra letter is simply a س written in a different position, but it was shoehorned to obfuscated. In Arabic letter shapes are different depending on whether they are in the beginning , middle or end of a word.
As a matter of fact, all of the knowledge needed for deciphering ancient texts and their complexity was derived from the Qur'an. It was by analyzing the syntactic structure of the Qur'an that the Arabic root system was developed. This system was first attested to in Kitab Al-Ayin, the first intralanguage dictionary of its kind, which preceded the Oxford English dictionary by 800 years. It was through this development that the concept of Arabic roots was established and later co-opted into the term 'semitic root,' allowing the decipherment of ancient scripts. In essence, they quite literally copied and pasted the entirety of the Arabic root. Hebrew had been dead, as well as all the other dialects of Arabic, until being 'revived' in a Frankensteinian fashion in the 18th and 19th centuries.
The entire region spoke basically the same language, with mumbled dialect continuums spread about, and Arabic is the oldest form from which all these dialects branched off. As time passed, the language gradually became more degenerate,
Language; When one looks at the actual linguistics, one will find that many were puzzled by the opposite, that is, how the other "semetic" languages were more "evolved" than Arabic, while Arabic had archaic features, not only archaic compared to bibilical Hebrew, Ethiopic, "Aramaic" contemporary "semetic" languages, but even archaic compared to languages from ancient antiquity; Ugaritic, Akkadain. What is meant here by Archaic is not what most readers think, it is Archaic not in the sense that it is simple, but rather that it is complex (think Latin to pig Latin or Italian or Old English, which had genders and case endings to modern English), not only grammatically, but also phonetically; All the so called semitic languages are supposed to have evolved from protosemetic, the Alphabet for protosemitic is that of the so called Ancient South Arabian (which interestingly corresponds with the traditional Arabic origins account) and has 28 Phonemes. Arabic has 28 phonemes. Hebrew has 22, same as Aramaic, and other "semitic" languages. Now pause for a second and think about it, how come Arabic, a language that is supposed to have come so late has the same number of letters as a language that supposedly predates it by over a millennium (Musnad script ~1300 BCE). Not only is the glossary of phonemes more diverse than any other semitic language, but the grammar is more complex, containing more cases and retains what's linguists noted for its antiquity, broken plurals. Indeed, a linguist has once noted that if one were to take everything we know about languages and how they develop, Arabic is older than Akkadian (~2500 BCE).
And then the Qur'an appeared with the oldest possible form of the language thousands of years later. This is why the Arabs of that time were challenged to produce 10 similar verses, and they couldn't. People think it's a miracle because they couldn't do it, but I think the miracle is the language itself. They had never spoken Arabic, nor has any other language before or since had this mathematical precision. And when I say mathematical, I quite literally mean mathematical.
Now how is it that the Qur'an came thousands of years later in an alphabet that had never been recorded before, and in the highest form the language had ever taken?
The creator is neither bound by time nor space, therefore the names are uttered as they truly were, in a language that is lexically, syntactically, phonemically, and semantically older than the oldest recorded writing. In fact, that writing appears to have been a simplified version of it. Not only that, but it would be the equivalent of the greatest works of any particular language all appearing in one book, in a perfect script and in the highest form the language could ever take. It is so high in fact, that it had yet to be surpassed despite the fact that over the last millennium the collection of Arabic manuscripts when compared on word-per-word basis in Western Museums alone, when they are compared with the collected Greek and Latin manuscripts combined, the latter does not constitute 1 percent of the former as per German professor Frank Griffel, in addition all in a script that had never been recorded before. Thus, the enlightenment of mankind from barbarism and savagery began, and the age of reason and rationality was born from its study.
God did bring down the Qur’an, Mohamed is his Messenger.
After i watched this video with clear details i just realized how lucky and blessed islam and its followers is. Alhamdulilah for such videos that increase our iman everyday.
Alhamdulillah
POISON
How can the Bible become corrupt if it was the word of God?
@@RenewedPerspective3626 this kid 💀
@@da_mocha so you wont answer and instead will insult me? Maybe you should go ask Allah for forgiveness.
Keep growing the beard kyle! Also can you do a video on atonement in orthodoxy and why the keys of death and decent into hades is so important
Bobby literally debunked the whole video.
Fire video bro, if any Muslim bro wants to refer to videos rebutting these claims please feel free to share, I like to see the arguments from both sides.
It's hard to find videos of Muslim apologists successfully defending their faith against these challenges
Muslims have debunked these arguments centuries ago. Christians keep coming back with the same weak debunked arguments over and over again. If you think ppl haven't responded to these than you haven't even tried looking for answerr.
any acedmic research will tell you what this guy is saying about Islam is stupid and based on biased claims. this guys has no firm academic research about Islam, he is not an Islamic scholar/researcher. he is a Christian apologist who thinks he knows more about Islam than most Muslims, which is rich. that's like me saying i know more about Christianity than Christians when i'm a Muslim (even tho i'm an ex Christian).
if you are so interested (not passive aggressive) then please get the right information i am begging you from the first 4 minutes this man has given ENTIRE wrong information and his logic is just that
if anything in the bible is different in the quran then it is wrong its literally just comparing the 2 books he hasnt studied islam properly
This video was really biases toward christianity without understanding Islam lol @@harrisjaved8251
@@harrisjaved8251i already said this so many times and warned so many people about it
I just realized that the UA-cam comment section war will never end
fr
Fr people thinking they're giga-geniuses who dump down endless scriptures of who-knows-what translated hadiths & ayats into the comment section really thinking people are gonna read allat. Religious debates are a joke nowadays.
It will never.
You revert from one religion to another, it's problematic since you got "deceived". I swear people just can't mind their own business.
@@NuttyJamesGMD the quran is a man made book desined to create endless debates
107k views in 2 days! Kyle is on fire! ❤☦️ God bless you Kyle this is a very important video.
Quick reminder that not all Protestants are iconoclasts. Especially not most evangelicals.
The closest that most evangelicals get is the idea that some people treat icons like idols, which is certainly true. Just like the crying Mary statue.
Catholics always assume stuff about protestantism that isn't true. From my experience on the internet ive seen way more catholic iconoclasts than protestant iconoclasts.
Abdools don't like this
of course we don't like lies
😴😴😴😴😴😒
Abdool? Racist garbage.
More I watch these kinda videos the more my faith on allah increases😊
@rabielazazi787 ah, your book says your allowed to lie tho? And that Allah is the greatest deciever😂😂😂 it's right infront of your eyes kid, just open them
thanks man it's currently 5:24 am
imma go pray fajr
W BRO
Another bearded Kyle Video🧔♂️☦️😎
Every knee will bow ✝️
Beautiful
you don't even bow daily, what makes you think everyone will bow to Jesus a prophet?
@@mysticx5149 proof he doesn't bow daily proof Jesus Is a prophet?
@@gregkareem9824 the proof is in my Quran, now let me ask you how is Jesus god?
@@mysticx5149 Islam is a fake religion
Bro please continue to make more videos like this
Why is that the video is clearly false teaching
@@Mos210k0can you explain why
@@Mos210k0Allah is a fake god he is a demon at best he is a fake.
@@hamzaa.-oz7rm explain what?
@@hamzaa.-oz7rmhe said Islam is not right because Islam did not contradict christianity
Thank you so much
For reminding me to pray isha
5:12 I should not be laughing, but I am...
😂
Share video ilwith your family members and friends and also share ex muslim channels
Okay then keep it up.
Unintentional comedy at the start of the video:
"It's been a while since . . "
*large hermit beard*
Lord Jesus Christ Son of God Have Mercy upon me a sinner
The Bible proves that Muhammad (saws) is a true Prophet!
-
[The word "Prophet" comes from the word "prophecy"]
-
Deuteronomy 18:22
"If a prophet speaks in the name of the Lord but the thing does not take place or prove true, it is a word that the Lord has not spoken."
-
In the previous verse, it is asked how one can distinguish a TRUE prophet from a FALSE prophet.
-
The answer was that only a TRUE prophet makes prophecies that ACTUALLY happen.
-
And you know what? Muhammad (saws) made HUNDREDS of prophecies that are very precise and yet ACTUALLY happened!
Matthew 7:15 “Watch out for false prophets. They come to you in sheep’s clothing, but inwardly they are ferocious wolves.
@@lcrevilla The Bible proves that Muhammad (saws) is a true Prophet!
-
[The word "Prophet" comes from the word "prophecy"]
-
Deuteronomy 18:22
"If a prophet speaks in the name of the Lord but the thing does not take place or prove true, it is a word that the Lord has not spoken."
-
In the previous verse, it is asked how one can distinguish a TRUE prophet from a FALSE prophet.
-
The answer was that only a TRUE prophet makes prophecies that ACTUALLY happen.
-
And you know what? Muhammad (saws) made HUNDREDS of prophecies that are very precise and yet ACTUALLY happened!
But the bible itself says jesus isn't god.😂
@@Cosmophilicjohn 10:30 Jesus says “I and the father are one” hmm Jesus still isn’t god yet? John 14:6 Jesus says “I am the way the truth and the life no comes through the father except through me” The Bible still doesn’t say Jesus isn’t god?
Aisha: I'm nine
Mohamad: That's fine
😂😂😂 😆 😆 😝
😂😂😂😂 😆
''iT wAs NoRmAl fOR tHe TiME''😂
He married her at 6 though
some Muslims say she was actually 20 lol who knows
finally people finding out about this, i cant believe this exists, im so tired of lies upon lies
The bible and Catholicism is exactly the same, Ill debate it with you and prove I'm right.
@@scaledsilverthe Bible says Israel would be a nation again. After 2000 years it happened Israel became a nation. How do you disprove such a specific prophecy????
@@ECA419 Israel became a nation again in 1948, 2000 thousand years after.
The biblical Israel isn't the Israel of today its materialistic and flooded with the mark of the fallen, though many delusional addicts to living in the last days type of people tend to want to understand this prophecy in a misunderstood way. Isaiah 53 is not about Israel today or Jesus, but about the Israel that was finished off in AD70.
None of the prophesies in the Bible were aimed at events thousands of years in the future - they were all aimed at the very near future which never came to be thus we are left with a husk of a nation.
Ezekiel 34:13 was fulfilled with the resurrection, not when a bunch of unbelievers of the crucifixion decided to create a new country in the Levant.
The true prophecy is biblically that the generation that sees "Israel" rise again (us) shall be the last generation. which may be a fact as now we are headed into a possibly ww3 because the modern corrupt Israel is practicing the same delusion of violence the old testaments devil(god) carried. wake up.
do you not see the massive amount of contradictions these texts carry? Israel isn't the nation of god, but is a tool for destruction, The real Israel and its people died.
@@scaledsilver say what you will! It’s all chatter. Jesus is coming back to what we call Israel and it exist today!!! He setting foot on the mount of olives. It’s a miracle. One day they will “believe in the one they pierced it’s prophesied” (Jesus) it’s going to happen. Islam is false. For crying out loud Muhammad has no claim to be a major prophet for the people he’s not even Jewish. He’s an Arab who plagiarized the Bible to fit his own perverted narrative. The guys married an 6 years. Took a flying donkey to “Jerusalem” that nobody saw 🤣🤣🤣
by the way Jerusalem is not even named in the Quran not even once. He’s self appointed. Nobody was self appointed in scripture not one.
@@scaledsilver bro religion in a whole is fucked up, very islamic of you to immediatly assume im a christian💀
Me as a Christian: another day another win for the OGs
Opposite
If being a Christian means being delusional then hey you do you I guess
OGs are jews
@@vivieie proof?
@@gregkareem9824Judaism was the first abrahamic religion, its a historical fact, not opinion, that Judaism became a religion long before christianity, and like the video stated, islam stole from Judaism. but we, jews AND christians, can both be OGs 😛
Thank you for making this. Some of the arguments for Islam are like throwing an arrow and drawing a circle where it lands, then claiming you hit the mark.
Both Muhammad & Moses enabled their followers to conquer Palestine. Each gave a law, fled from their enemies (Moses to Midian, Muhammad to Medina, we know that geographically, Biblical Midian is located in modern day Western Saudi Arabia), marched to battle against their enemies, wrought miracles. These correlations prove that Muhammad (ﷺ) is the Prophet according to Deuteronomy 18:15, 18 Both Muhammad & Moses (Peace be upon them) were brought up in their enemies' houses, appeared among idolaters, were at first rejected by their own people and afterward accepted by them.
📖 The LORD your GOD will raise up for you a Prophet like me (Moses) from your midst, from your brethren. Him you shall hear, I will raise up for them a Prophet like you from among their brethren, and will put My words in his mouth, and he shall speak to them all that I command him.' Deuteronomy 18:15, 18 predicted prophet Muhammad (ﷺ), the descendants of Ishmael, the Arabs..
Since "from your midst" does not appear in either the ancient Greek Old Testament (the Septuagint) or the Samaritan Pentateuch, the original text must state the prophet (Muhammad ﷺ) would come from the relatives of the Israelites, the descendants of Ishmael, the Arabs.
Your God said in 📖 Duetornomy 18:20 that false prophet from their nearby brother tribe (the Arabs) must die without fulfilling the prophecies of Isaiah 42. GOD of Bible also informed us that the true prophet (Muhammad ﷺ) from their nearby brother tribe (the Arabs) would talk about the same GOD of Moses and fulfill prophecies of duetornomy 18:18 as well as Isaiah 42.
Also, one notices from the Gospel of John (1:19-21) that the Jews were waiting for the fulfillment of three distinct prophecies. The first was the coming of Christ. The second was the coming of Elijah. The third was the coming of the Prophet (Muhammad ﷺ. An Arabian prophet mentioned in Isaiah 42:11 to fulfill the prophecies of Isaiah 42.)
📖 Deuteronomy 18:20 But any prophet who falsely claims to speak in my name or who speaks in the name of another god must die.’
📖 Deuteronomy 18:21 “But you may wonder, ‘How will we know whether or not a prophecy is from the Lord?
📖 Deuteronomy 18:22 If the prophet speaks in the Lord’s name but his prediction does not happen or come true, you will know that the Lord did not give that message. That prophet has spoken without my authority and need not be feared.
Our Prophet Muhammad (ﷺ) passed all the above conditions stated by TRUE GOD of Bible in Deuteronomy 18:18-22 for identifying the true prophet.
This is obvious from the three questions that were posed to John the Baptist: “Now this was John’s testimony, when the Jews of Jerusalem sent priests and Levites to ask him who he was. He did not fail to confess, but confessed freely, “I am not the Christ.” They asked him, “Then who are you? Are you Elijah?” He said, “I am not.” “Are you the Prophet?” He answered, “No.” (📖 John 1:19-21)
If we look in a Bible with cross-references, we will find in the marginal notes where the words “the Prophet” occur in John 1:21, that these words refer to the prophecy of 📖 Deuteronomy 18:15 and 18:18. We conclude from this that Jesus Christ is not the prophet mentioned in Deuteronomy 18:18.
From the brothers of the Israelites:
Abraham had two sons, Ishmael and Isaac (Genesis 21). Ishmael became the grandfather of the Arab nation, and Isaac became the grandfather of the Jewish nation.
The prophet spoken (in Deuteronomy 18:15-22) of was not to come from among the Jews themselves, but from among their brothers, i.e. the Ishmaelites. Muhammad, a descendant of Ishmael, is indeed this prophet.
Also, Isaiah 42:1-13 speaks of the servant of GOD (abd - ullah), His “chosen one” (Mustafa) in whom I delight (Habibullah’) and “messenger” who will bring down a law. “He will not falter or be discouraged till he establishes justice on earth. In his law the islands will put their hope.” (Isaiah 42:4). see Isaiah 42:21 talks about magnified laws (Al-Quran,Shariah.)
ua-cam.com/video/MfdNxRX6Dbs/v-deo.html
Kyle isnt a smart person please listen to this video if you want to clear up on your mind about Islam.
Kyle fails on his accusations and this video explains it well
@prophetmuhammadinbibleisaiah
I’m not reading all of that. Plus, your UA-cam name is too lengthy not to mention false. Opinion rejected. Christ is King!
@@michaelbarry1664 well you are just rejecting a Opinion you didnt even listened. First read it with a open mind, Islam is the way to the truth and Im just inviting you to way of the truth. Just read what my brother has written after it the choice to go in the way or not is yours.
@@michaelbarry1664 weak counter. matter of fact what did you even accomplish with this 😭😭🙏
I will not argue with you brother, just will pray that Allah SWT guides you to the right path ❤
And we will pray that Allah misguides you to the right path.
@@chr_my may Allah give you the best life and best health, hope you walk down the right path brother
@@Floki_47 You don't know what that 'right path' is, you just think you do because you've been brainwashed. And bribed - you get to look down on the rest of humanity while still in this world, and get your e*ection, virgins, boys, wine etc in the hereafter. It must be the right path if it leads to egotism and sleaze, it simply can't be otherwise.
Can we get a Mormonism debunked video?
That will need to be a series 😅
Watch Phillion's video regarding the subject. (Even if he's possibly an Atheist) It's pretty great at going over the historical fallacies as well as the hęrėsy found within the primary contents and practices there.
LOL you can't debunk the truth. The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints is God's and Jesus Christ's one and only true church here on earth.
@@dylanwilliams2202 it preaches a different gospel, so it is de facto false.
@@aquavitae3824 No we don't. If we teach a different gospel from current Christianity then it is because what current Christianity teaches is false.
Man Kyle That Beard is looking good.
Islam only works in a vacuum.
This pretty much sums up my thoughts around it.
looking into things from a single side isn't wise
Bruh... allah hates sin and refuses to even directly interact with his own creation/mankind on earth... but, for some reason... even though he would NEVER allow himself to dirty/lower himself by coming to earth and interacting with man (even though he created them in the first place) directly... he literally brings man into his heavenly home itself and dirties it that way.
Not only that, but he orders man on earth not to commits sins, not to have lust/sex with women, not to drink alcohol, etc.... BUT THEN, for some reason (even though he'd never interact with mankind or show himself because its beneath him/ungodly), once you get to HEAVEN, not only can you drink alcohol and have sex and sin... but 'supposed' believers are promised dozens upon dozens of virgins who you can fck to your heart's content, that allah then re-virginizes for you to have sex with again and again... and not only can you now drink alcohol in heaven (AKA, taint god's home/presence/name), but he will provide you with "rivers of wine" for you to drink to your heart's content!!!
That's disgusting! It's literally anti-god. Why would God ever allow sin into his holy, heavenly abode??? Especially, why would he allow sin and unholy behavior in heaven... SPECIFICALLY when allah is supposedly so separate, holy, and pure that he won't even physically go to man/earth and interact with the sinful lifeforms that He himself created (thus dirtying himself). Its illogical and makes no sense. Its sinful and disgusting, and if allah truly kept separate from mankind on Earth to keep/maintain his separate, oneness, holiness... then why would he EVER allow that kind of behavior/sin to exist/occur in the purity of HEAVEN itself?!?!?!
There's sooo many other reasons why Muhammed/Islam is so messed up/dirty/sinful/non-godlike... but that alone should bring you a great number of questions to ask yourself. Then, when you include the Quran introducing the bird-goddesses in addition to god himself (which not only destroys the supposed sanctity of the oneness of allah, but also destroys the eternal and infallibility of the Word of god itself); when you include the disgusting behaviors of Muhammed (who was supposedly a moral example for mankind for time immemorial) and compare them to the perfect, sinless life of Jesus; and the inconsistencies all throughout the Quran and the Hadiths and the history of Islam itself... it should open the flood-gates for a tsunami of questions to ask yourself concerning the truth/lies within islam, and it will hopefully set you on the right path towards the single, one, perfect, true God.
Good luck my friend, and may God give you peace, direction, and forgiveness as you begin your journey to finding the everlasting, unyielding, loving, and spotless truth of God.@@Youraverageytwatcherr
Islam works like the devil, on the same page as LGBTQ+, just remember what the + stands for,
It's there for a reason.
@@Youraverageytwatcherr Exactly. I can't reason you out of something you haven't been reasoned into, espescially not through a comment section. Alas, I urge you to wake up.
Don't forget Islam's view on dogs compared to literally every other culture. In Islam you're not supposed to have a dog as a pet, though a guard dog is ok if it has a job etc. This is all because the "angel" Gabriel was supposed to visit Muhammad but refused entry as Aisha snuck a dog in earlier. According to Islam if you have a pet in your home or in general, you lose out on your good deeds daily...
Muslims claim it's because dogs carry diseases and are impure, affecting prayer etc but why would that affect an angel? "Angels" according to Islam apparently also can't enter homes if you have a pictures of people on the walls, so goodbye pictures of Grandma XDXD
The funny thing is, in pre-islamic folklore, they used to associate wolves with warding off evil and bad spirits; preventing them from changing form... Dogs are the Descendants of wolves...
So maybe Muhammad was being manipulated by something this whole time, condoning his messed up actions like abolishing adoption because he was lusting after his adopted son's wife and his lustful/violent life in general...
bismillah,
lets tackle the statements 1 by 1.
The Prophet (ﷺ) said, "Angels do not enter a house in which there is a dog or there are pictures." Sahih al-Bukhari 5949
In-book reference : Book 77, Hadith 165
In a narration of Muslim, the Messenger of Allah (ﷺ) is reported to have said: "He who keeps a dog for any reason other than to guard his property (lands) or his flock of sheep, his good deeds equal to two Qirat will be deducted every day." Riyad as-Salihin 1689
In-book reference : Book 17, Hadith 179
So with these 2 hadiths in mind,
yes an angel won't enter a home with a dog in it,
BUT it has nothing to do with impurity and what not it's just a command by Allah no more and no less.
'condoning his messed up actions like abolishing adoption'
Adoption wasn't abolished it was given another form like:
Sponsoring an orphan in Islam is to include an orphan, spend on him, and take care of his interests and affairs.
and fun fact:
many of the companions had "adopted" sons like Zayd ibn Ḥāritha al-Kalbī he adopted Hakim ibn Hizam
Many Hadith about sponsoring an orphan that our beloved the Prophet Mohammad said.
The Messenger of Allah (saw) said, ‘The best house among the Muslims is the house in which orphans are well-treated. The worst house among the Muslims is the house in which orphans are ill-treated’. Reference : Al-Adab Al-Mufrad 137
In-book reference : Book 7, Hadith 9
But you say wait what's the difference then?
Well for one you cant change his family name, Because the adoptive family can’t take the place of the biological family, they act as guardians and are responsible for the care of another person’s child. Allah Ultimately told us in the Quran how he doesn’t leave the orphans or in need alone:
Did He not find you an orphan and shelter you? And He found you wandering, and He guided you. And He found you in need and made you independent. Therefore, treat not the orphan with harshness, nor drive away a petitioner (unheard). But the bounty of the Lord - rehearse and proclaim! (Quran 93:6-11)
Second, The child who took with Kafalah does not inherit from the family who sponsors him because Kafalah is not one of the reasons for an inheritance
"and his lustful/violent life in general..."
Well first the lustful part,
if He was truly lustful, why did he only marry one woman that was 40 and already have children and stayed married to ONLY her for 24 years (until she died) if he was lustful?
and lets look at his other marriages,
2nd marriage was a 50 year old woman, cool
3rd Aa’ishah bint Abi Bakr al-Siddeeq 9, cool
4th Hafsah bint ‘Umar 25, cool Keep in mind he married these woman in his 60s when lust in men is at the lowest point.
and i can go on and on.
Is this truly a lustful man?
he married a woman in her 40s for 25 years
then only remarried in his 60s when HE was approached
a mans libido is at his lowest during his 60s
So first part of the claim debunked id say
second part,
"violent life in general"
So lets see was he violent,
did he ever START wars?
no 1st war was caused by the infidels at the battle of badr
2nd was again not caused by him
and so on and so forth
Now lets see when he DID win wars for example the conquest of mekkah
what did he do to the inhabitants? did he annihilate them all?
keep in mind these are the people who TORTURED, KILLED and exiled him and his companions for a DECADE so what did he say?
The Prophet (saw) then addressed the very people who had oppressed and slandered him and who persecuted and killed his companions. He asked them what they thought he would do with them, to which they replied, ‘You are our noble brother, son of our noble brother! We expect nothing but goodness from you.’
The Prophet (saw) said, ‘I say to you as Yusuf (Joseph) said to his brothers, “No blame upon you today. Allah will forgive you, for He is the Most Merciful of the merciful.”’ [The Noble Qur’an, 12:92]
In another narration, the Prophet (saw) said to them, ‘Go, you are free.’
la illah illa allah muhammed rasul allah (theres no god but allah and muhammed is his prophet)
but WAIT did he brutally extinguish cities like the mongols when he conquered, what were his rules of war?
Now let us see what rights Islam has conferred on the combatants.
Torture with Fire? Impermissable
Protection of the Wounded
The Prisoner of War Should not be Slain
No one Should be Tied to be Killed
No Looting and Destruction in the Enemy's Country
Sanctity of Property
The Muslims have also been prohibited from taking anything from the general public of a conquered country without paying for it
Return of Corpses of the Enemy
Prohibition of Breach of Treaties
Protection of civilians and non-combatants
The Holy Prophet (may peace be upon him) has given clear instructions about the behaviour of the Muslim army. He observed:
"Set out for Jibad in the name of Allah and for the sake of Allah. Do not lay hands on the old verging on death, on women, children and babes. Do not steal anything from the booty and collect together all that falls to your lot in the battlefield and do good, for Allah loves the virtuous and the pious."
Prohibition against indiscriminate weapons
and so on
you can read more here: www.iium.edu.my/deed/hadith/muslim/019_smt.html#:~:text=The%20Holy%20Prophet%20(may%20peace%20be%20upon%20him)%20has%20given,on%20women%2C%20children%20and%20babes.
Anyone reading this and maybe the commentor himself can learn from this and i will say as the caliph abu bakr the companion of the prophet said
"If I Do Good, Help Me; and If I Do Wrong, Correct Me"
Thanks to all
@@thegamingpro1985nobody's reading all that chuslim
@@harsh6764
then its not for you lol its for someone who got doubt in his faith cuz of these comments
@@thegamingpro1985h
@@muhammadhasan400 ؟
The Gecko part got me
From the very first word of the Quran it appears obvious to me that Mohammad did not understand how information is transferred through reading a text. It must’ve seemed like magic to him. He also seemed not to comprehend that books were able to be copied and distributed far and wide and that if you changed one copy it did not affect all the others.
I’m an atheist ⚛️ but watching people debunk other religions is interesting ngl
Are there certain parts of each religion that you don't like/agree with/turned you away from them, specifically? Or, do you just not believe in any sort of god/divine power, just in general?
@user-xp5id1kh4r a lot of us are uninterested in religion because of how many transcripts get things very wrong scientifically
Atheists like OP believe that God isn't real, while an agnostic like me doesn't deny a God, but just doesn't involve themselves in religion
@@JohnDorian-j7x
I presume that Calizen believes in the Holy Trinity: "proton, electron, neutron" & the "divine power" is the nuclear binding energy of Atom ⚛️.
Ahmeen.@@The_Green_Man_OAP
Now that makes me wonder: is he a Dyothelitist who believes in both the Strong and the Weak Nuclear Forces as separate forces, or an apostate that believes they are one in the same... aka, a Monothelitist?
@@The_Green_Man_OAP
Thanks for the video, After 28 years of me being Muslim, I am going to pray Friday Prayer.
Good Luck converting more people Muslim.
Alhamdulillah
I haven't watched the video yet but I already know it's a banger.
Well done brother. Subscribed. God bless you
You believe this lie brother?
@@Mos210k0you kill any geckos lately? Or maybe you’ve got your attention on a minor? 🤡🤮
@@Mos210k0Where's the lie? Lmao
@@Visarta everything?
Be specific lmao. If you're honest, say which one is a lie and lets fact check to see ;)@@Mos210k0
Kyle I don’t know if you edit your own videos or someone else does but unreal editing genuinely dude 🔥
*15 Astonishing facts About Islam That you Really don't know !*
*1)* *“Islam” means “surrender” or “submission”* . “Salam” (which means “peace”) is the root word of “Islam”. In a religious context the word “Islam” means “the surrendering of one’s will (without compulsion) to the true will of God in an effort to achieve peace”.
*2)* *“Muslim” means “anyone or anything that surrenders itself to the true will of God”.* By this definition, everything in nature (trees, animals, planets, etc.) are “muslims” because they are in a state of surrender to God’s will. In other words, they are fulfilling the purpose for which God created them.
*3)* *Islam is not a new religion or cult.* It is a universal way of life and civilization. *Again, Islam is not a new religion,* rather it is the same message preached by all earlier prophets such as Adam, Noah, Abraham, Moses, and Jesus (peace be upon them all). But God’s final message to mankind was revealed to the last prophet, Muhammad (peace be upon him), as a revival of lost teachings of previous prophets and as a reconfirmation of the eternal message. Studies show that between 1.5 and 1.8 billion people in the world identify their religion as Islam. Along with Judaism and Christianity it traces its roots through Prophet Abraham and back to the first humans Adam and Eve.
*4)* *There are five pillars of practice in Islam.* These practices must be undertaken with the best of effort in order to be considered a true Muslim: A) Declaration of faith: A statement proclaiming the belief in One God and that Muhammad is a prophet of God. To become Muslim a person simply recites this statement publicly, and in Arabic. B) Formal prayer five times a day. C) Poor-due tax: 2.5% of one’s excess wealth given to the needy once a year. D) Fasting during the daylight hours in the month of Ramadan. E) Pilgrimage to Mecca at least once, if physically and financially able.
*5)* *There are six articles of faith in Islam.* These are the basic beliefs that one must have in order to be considered a true Muslim. They are belief in: A) the One God. B) all of the true prophets of God. C) the original scriptures revealed to Moses, David, Jesus and Muhammad. D) the angels. E) the Day of Judgment and the Hereafter. F) destiny.
*6)* *Muslims believe in the one Creator of the Universe, referring to Him as “Allah”* which is the Arabic word for “God”. Muslims worldwide, even English-speaking Muslims, frequently use the Arabic word “Allah” because Arabic is the language of the Qur’an. But Allah is no different than the God of Abraham, Moses and Jesus. The Creator is the Creator regardless of what people call Him. In the English language He is most commonly referred to as “God”. Yet Jesus spoke a different language, referring to God as “Eloi” in Mark 15:34 of the New Testament. Are “God” and “Eloi” different gods? Many Hispanics call God “Dios” and many French say “Dieu”. It would logically follow then that people who refer to God as “Allah” in the Arabic language are referring to the very same God. In fact, many Arab Jews and Arab Christians call God “Allah”. And the word “Allah” is written in Arabic script on the walls of many Arab churches and on the pages of Arabic Bibles. So while the understanding of God may differ between faith groups, the various names used to describe Him does not change the fact that the one Creator of the Universe is the God of all people.
This is *Allah* Almighty, The Creator, the one and only true God. He is my God, our God:
*"Allah - there is no deity except Him, the Ever-Living, the Sustainer of [all] existence. Neither drowsiness overtakes Him nor sleep. To Him belongs whatever is in the heavens and whatever is on the earth. Who is it that can intercede with Him except by His permission? He knows what is [presently] before them and what will be after them, and they encompass not a thing of His knowledge except for what He wills. His Kursi (Throne) extends over the heavens and the earth, and their preservation tires Him not. And He is the Most High, the Most Great."*
(Quran 2:255)
*{Say, “He is Allah, the One. Allah, to Whom the creatures turn for their needs. He begets not, nor was He begotten, and there is none like Him.” }*
(Quran, 112:1-4)
Allah Almighty says in the Quran:
*"Say, "O My servants who have transgressed against themselves [by sinning], do not despair of the mercy of Allah . Indeed, Allah forgives all sins. Indeed, it is He who is the Forgiving, the Merciful."*
[Quran 39:53]
*7)* *The Islamic concept of God* is that He is loving, merciful and compassionate. Islam also teaches that He is all-knowing and the perfect judge of affairs, and will punish (or forgive) accordingly. However, Allah once said to Muhammad, “My mercy prevails over my wrath”. So Islam teaches a balance between fear and hope, protecting one from both complacency and despair.
*8)* *Muslims believe that God has revealed 99 of His names, or attributes, in the Qur’an.* It is through these names that one can come to know the Creator. A few of these names are the All-Merciful, the All-Knower, the Protector, the Provider, the Near, the First, the Last, the Hidden and the Source of All Peace.
*9)* *The Christian concept of “vicarious atonement” (the idea that Jesus died for the sins of humanity) is alien to the Islamic concept of personal responsibility.* Islam teaches that on the Day of Judgment every person will be resurrected and will be accountable to God for their every word and deed. Consequently, a practicing Muslim is always striving to be righteous while hoping and praying for God’s acceptance and grace.
*10)* *Muslims believe in all of the true prophets* that preceded Muhammad, from Adam to Jesus. Muslims believe they brought the same message of voluntarily surrendering to God’s will (islam, in a generic sense) to different peoples at different times. Muslims also believe they were “muslims” (again, in a generic sense) since they followed God’s true guidance and surrendered their will to Him.
*11)* *Muslims neither worship Muhammad nor pray through him.* Muslims worship the Unseen, Omniscient Creator, Allah.
*12)* *Muslims accept the original unaltered Torah (as revealed to Moses) and the original unaltered Bible (as revealed to Jesus)* since they were revealed by God. But none of these scriptures exist today in their original form or in their entirety. Therefore, Muslims follow the subsequent, final and preserved revelation of God, the Qur’an.
*13)* *The Qur’an was not authored by Muhammad.* It was authored by God, revealed to Muhammad (through angel Gabriel) and written into physical form by his companions.
*14)* *The original Arabic text of the Qur’an contains no flaws or contradictions* and has not been altered since its revelation.
*15)* *Actual 7th century Qur’ans, complete and intact,* are on display in museums in Turkey and other places around the world.
🔹️ *EVIDENCE ISLAM IS TRUTH*
The following are Scientific, logical, and historical proofs that Islam is the Truth:
www.islamreligion.com/category/33/evidence-islam-is-truth/
🔸️ *For more information about Islam:*
www.islam-guide.com
🔹️ *Everything to know about the Prophet of Islam*
rasoulallah.net/en/articles/article/6818/
🔹️ *"Myths about The Prophet of Islam"*
www.muhammadfactcheck.org
🔹️ *Islam and Racism*
Islam with its universal concept of brotherhood rejects all artificial and man-made marks of distinction.
Allah Almighty says in the noble Quran:
"O mankind, indeed We (Allah) have created you from male and female and made you peoples and tribes that you may know one another. Indeed, the most noble of you in the sight of Allah is the most righteous of you. Indeed, Allah is Knowing and Acquainted."
*(Quran 49:13)*
No one can claim any superiority over the other based on race, color, language or wealth and this is emphasized in the last sermon of Prophet Muhammad (peace be upon him) showing high regard of humanity irrespective of color or race:
"“All mankind is from Adam and Eve, an Arab has no superiority over a non-Arab nor a non-Arab has any superiority over an Arab; also a white has no superiority over a black nor does a black have any superiority over a white except by piety and good action.”
🔹️ *How to convert (revert) to Islam*
Basically to become a Muslim is very simple.. you need to say the decleration of faith oraly while you believe in it by heart with a firm conviction and unshakeable faith.
*The decleration of Faith in Islam (The Shahada)*
The Shahada (in Arabic) can be declared as follows :
*“ASH-HADU ANLA ELAHA ILLA-ALLAH WA ASH-HADU ANNA MOHAMMADAN RASUL-ALLAH”*
The English translation is :
*“I bear witness that there is no deity (none truly to be worshipped) but, Allah, and I bear witness that Mohammad is the messenger of Allah.”*
However, it would not be sufficient for anyone to only utter this testimony oraly either in private or in public; but rather, he should believe in it by heart with a firm conviction and unshakeable faith. If one is truly sincere and complies with the teachings of Islam in all his life, he will find himself a new born person.
🔹️ *New Muslim Guide (in several languages)*
newmuslimguide.com/ar/languages
🔹️ *New Muslims eLearning site*
(It is for new Muslim converts who would like to learn their new religion in an easy and systematic way. Lessons here are organized under levels.)
www.newmuslims.com/
📖 *Order your Free Copy [English Translation of the Quran]*
www.quranproject.org/freequran.php
■🖥 🎧 Watch and listen to *"Beautiful Quran Recitation "*
(with english subtitles)
ua-cam.com/video/GkjNROBu6l0/v-deo.html
1400
I am not reading allat
Nice taqiyya. Tell us about muhammed's slaves, particularly his favorite 'bed slave', Mary the Copt.
Allah is satan
Jesus will defeat Allah in the last days of this world
You muslims will see that Jesus is God and everyone will bow his knees before him and confess that he is the resurrected Lord
Hmmm let’s see Aisha’s age
Islam would much rather talk trash about Christianity. Its like that guy who has nothing to offer so he just talks down about the other guy. Islam says muhamed follows all the other prophets yet they have to go outside the quran to find what the other prophets said
And then they'll cry wolf on you when you literally just ask them basic questions, or even just read their book/Quran directly. And call you "rude af" for bringing up anything that might make Islam look bad. Smh
Other way around people dedicate their entire UA-cam lives to bashing Islam lol Christian channels but teach nothing other than why they believe Islam is false meanwhile Ya'll got zionists spitting at u disrespecting Jesus pbuh & his mother smh & no videos on these channels about any of this .. Extremely bizarre behavior
@@JohnDorian-j7x No one does that? Where? Who?
And Christians don't y'all doing it right now
There's more videos/channels like this heaps and bounds then there is the other way around as a matter of fact videos yea but I've never seen an entire Islamic channel fully dedicated to going at Christianity where every single video is about how false it is & it it dies exist I'd keep the same energy & say my brother is definitely unstable if that's all he has to offer rather than teach .. What's even more crazy is even tho we view Jesus (pbuh) different we respect him & his mother The Jews/Zionists do not & somehow a lot of Christians think they have this connection with them & Israel & all that .. Supporting that movement goes 100% against New Testament theology but anything to combat Islam can't make this stuff up 🤦♂️
Kyle, congratulations on producing your most viewed video! May the Holy Theotokos and all the saints protect and pray for you! May God bless you!☦️♥️
ua-cam.com/video/MfdNxRX6Dbs/v-deo.html
Kyle isnt a smart person please listen to this video if you want to clear up on your mind about Islam.
Kyle fails on his accusations and this video explains it well
You need to collab with Apostate Prophet.
that man is not someone worth collaborating with
The only problem is that the Apostate Prophet is Atheist
@@AliTanoli-cq3jsand David Wood
Why? Is he too boring for your liking?@@AliTanoli-cq3js
@@AliTanoli-cq3js If he made you (a muslim) mad, then he definitely is someone worth collaborating with.
thanks bro, im gonna go pray isha now
The funny thing is that everything they do against Islam is told by Allah in the Qur’an
Exodus 20:4-5 “You must not make any idols. Don't make any statues or pictures of anything up in the sky or of anything on the earth or of anything down in the water. Don't worship or serve idols of any kind, because I, the LORD, am your God.
@@Jakzeeditsok
@@Jakzeeditsok have fun with that im gonna go pray maghrib soon
I pray for your soul’s salvation. The Jinn of your religion are literal polytheistic deities worshipped at the Black Stone before Muhammad assumed control. It is not a spot that was “corrupted” by Polytheism, it was meant for Polytheistic worship. It is cope to not realize the Qu’ran was a mix of early Christian heresies and Jewish religious texts. Your faith is built on a false premise considering it was told that even if a angel testifies anything contrary to the gospels, it is demonic. Your god “allah” is nothing more than a demon in hell. This would explain the particular terroristic extremism of Islam, compared to Christianity. A pure and Holy God versus a deceptive demon, tricking Muhammad and all his followers.
Brother, thank you for this video. I'd also appreciate it if you made a playlist in your channel with ALL your debunks on heresies. Thank you in advance
You really believe a Human being was God of so why didn’t Jesus know things such as the Final hour and Why did he fall on his face in the Gardens of Gesthemanae ??
@@omarhaider7885 He wasn't "a human being. He's God, the promised Messiah. He knew everything. Thinking He didn't makes you absolutely an NPC
Jewish people reject the notion that Jesus is the Messiah; they are still awaiting the arrival of the Messiah. So from their perspective, the servant of Isaiah 42 stands as an unfulfilled prophecy of nearly three thousand years as their Messiah is yet to arrive. Now there is a serious issue with this understanding. We’ve already seen that the Prophet Muhammad (ﷺ) fulfils all the criteria mentioned in Isaiah 42, so the question must be asked: why would Isaiah set out criteria that can be fulfilled by individual (Prophet Muhammad) other than the Messiah, if it is indeed the Messiah to whom Isaiah 42 refers? If Isaiah is speaking of the Messiah, then we would expect that he would set out criteria that only the Messiah can fulfil. Otherwise it defeats the purpose of prophecy in the first place, because prophecies are supposed to be specific.
Also, one notices from the Gospel of John (1:19-21) that the Jews were waiting for the fulfillment of three distinct prophecies. And The 3rd was the coming of the Prophet (Muhammad ﷺ. An Arabian prophet mentioned in Isaiah 42:11 to fulfill the prophecies of Isaiah 42.)
This is obvious from the 3 questions that were posed to John the Baptist: “Now this was John’s testimony, when the Jews of Jerusalem sent priests and Levites to ask him who he was. He did not fail to confess, but confessed freely, “I am not the Christ.” They asked him, “Then who are you? Are you Elijah?” He said, “I am not.” “Are you the Prophet?” He answered, “No.” (John 1:19-21)
From this we conclude that Jesus Christ is not the prophet mentioned in Deuteronomy 18:18.
Because The first section of Isaiah 42, verses 1 - 17, describe a momentous servant in extremely positive terms, one who will be a “light for the Gentiles (non-jews/christians)” (42:6), will “open eyes that are blind” and “free people from darkness” (42:7) of idols worships. Isaiah 42:11 Even prophecies that This prophet will rise from the city of Medinah, Western Saudi Arabia. This is the righteous servant who will eliminate idolatry and spread justice (TRUE GOD's judgement) throughout the world 🌎.
Isaiah 42:21 Said that The God of Bible would magnify the Law to make people righteous. It's the hint about Shariah Law.
Any sincere person that interprets Isaiah 42 consistently will see that it simply cannot apply to Jesus, regardless of whether one takes it as a reference to his first or second coming. The fact is that Prophet Muhammad (ﷺ) is the only person in history that has fulfilled all of the criteria set out in Isaiah 42.
Now from the point of view of both Christians and Muslims, Jesus is indeed the Messiah. Now If we compare the characteristics of Isaiah 42 with the life and teachings of Jesus as they are portrayed in the New Testament, then the Messiah Jesus falls short in fulfilling the prophecy. For example, Isaiah 42 states that the servant will not cry out:He will not shout or cry out, or raise his voice in the streets. [Isaiah 42:2] This disqualifies Jesus, who complained and literally cried out directly to GOD, according to the Bible, at many points in his ministry: From noon until three in the afternoon darkness came over all the land. About three in the afternoon Jesus cried out in a loud voice, “Elli, Elli, lema sabachthani?” (which means “My GOD, my GOD, why have you forsaken me?”). [Matthew 27:45-46]
Actually Jesus spoke Aramaic which is the language that was closely intertwined with Arabic. He said "Eli, Eli" which sounds a little like "Illa, illa" pretty much like "Illah" in Arabic.
A Prophet like unto Moses. There were hardly any two prophets who were so much alike as Moses and Muhammad. Both were given comprehensive law code of life, both encountered their enemies and were victors in miraculous ways, both were accepted as prophets/statesmen and both migrated to (Midian/Medinah) following conspiracies to assassinate them. Both (Moses and Muhammad) enabled their followers to conquer the Palestine. The natural birth, family life and death of Moses and Muhammad (ﷺ) but not Jesus. (Peace be upon them all)
📖 Deuteronomy 18:15 Moses continued, “The LORD your God will raise up for you a prophet like me from among your brethren (your brother tribe; the Arabs).. You must listen to him.
Since "from your midst" does not appear in either the ancient Greek Old Testament (the Septuagint) or the Samaritan Pentateuch, the original text must state the prophet would come from the relatives of the Israelites, the descendants of Ishmael, the Arabs.
King James Bible
📖 The LORD thy GOD will raise up unto thee a Prophet from the midst of thee, of thy brethren, like unto me; unto him ye shall hearken;
GOD of Bible said in 📖 Duetornomy 18:20 that false prophet from their nearby brother tribe (the Arabs) must die without fulfilling the prophecies of duetornomy 18:18 as well as Isaiah 42.
GOD of Bible also informed us that the true prophet (Muhammad ﷺ) from their nearby brother tribe (the Arabs) would talk about the same GOD of Moses and fulfill the prophecies of duetornomy 18:18 as well as Isaiah 42.
The prophet spoken (in Deuteronomy 18:15-22) of was not to come from among the Jews themselves, but from among their brothers, i.e. the Ishmaelites. Muhammad (ﷺ), a descendant of Ishmael, is indeed this prophet.
The Awaited Prophet Was to Come From Arabia: Deuteronomy 33:1-2 combines references to Moses, Jesus and Muhammad. It speaks of God (i.e. God’s revelation) coming from Sinai, rising from Seir (probably the village of Sa’ir near Jerusalem) and shining forth from Paran. According to Genesis 21:21, the wilderness of Paran was the place where Ishmael settled (i.e. Arabia, specifically Makkah).
The Old Testament also tells us that Ishmael dwelt in a place called Paran: "While he (Ishmael) was living in the Desert of Paran, his mother got a wife for him from Egypt." [Genesis 21:21]
We are told that Ishmael will have many descendants and that he will be “made into a great nation”: And as for Ishmael, I have heard you: I will surely bless him; I will make him fruitful and will greatly increase his numbers. He will be the father of 12 rulers, and I will make him into a great nation. [Genesis 17:20]
A great nation must refer to one led by a Prophet since this is greatness in GOD’s sight, not mere wealth or power rather it's spiritual, and not material..
That's why Isaiah talks about the rejoicing of the inhabitants of Kedar (2nd son of Ishmael),
New International Version
📖 Isaiah 42:11 Let the wilderness and its towns raise their voices; let the settlements where Kedar lives rejoice. Let the people of Sela (in Medina) sing for joy; let them shout from the mountaintops.
The Old Testament scholar Charles Foster also identifies the the "Land of Kedar" with ‘Hedjaz’ which is Western Saudi Arabia including its famous cities of Makkah and Madina. [Charles Foster, The historical geography of Arabia, P. 130]
KJV Isaiah 60:7 All the flocks of Kedar shall be gathered together unto thee, the rams of Nebaioth shall minister unto thee: they shall come up with acceptance on mine altar, and I will glorify the house of my glory."
Genesis 25:13 clearly states that Kedar and Nebaioth are sons of Ishmael (Alaihissalam).
Yes, because Bible clearly talks about the Hajj in Mekkha and the rising of Last Prophet prophet Muhammad (ﷺ) of Bible from Medinah, Saudi Arabia.
One of the earliest biographies of the Prophet Muhammad (ﷺ), Tabaqat Ibn Sa’d (d. 845 CE), documents one of the chains of genealogy, which confirms that the Prophet was a direct descendant of Ishmael through his second son Kedar.
Notice the fact that not one Muslim can refute this video 😂
Hey! I grew up Roman Catholic but I'm still pretty young, (I'm not even a teenager yet) what could I do to look into Orthodoxy? Also my family does know about Vatican II and whats wrong with it
yeah, you can
if you consider Orthodoxy truth and it helps you to be closer to Jesus then why not
Definitely check out if there is an Orthodox Church near you and see if you can go visit! Get in touch with a priest. Feel free to reach out to me too if you need a friend to talk to :) I'll pray for you bro. God bless you! May the Holy Spirit guide you to the Orthodox Church!
Its all being controlled by Satanist Freemasons: the catholic church, orthodox church, mosques, synagogues, temples, school, book publishing, the TV, the internet.... Dont waste your time with these trolls, my fellow man. Follow your heart.
Nope, stay Catholic.
@@ItsChrisFtw why?
I am happy that we can agree Jesus Christ is the way.
The only way.
What do u mean we I’m atheist
But of that day and hour knoweth no [man], no, not the angels of heaven, but my Father only. (Matthew 24:36)
‘I am going away and coming back to you.’ If you loved Me, you would rejoice because I said, ‘I am going to the Father,’ for My Father is greater than I. (John 14:28)
And this is eternal life, that they may know You, the only true God, and Jesus Christ whom You have sent (John 17:3)
@@ZOI_XC convert to Christianity than
@@ZOI_XC Christian artifacts have been discovered recently, if you look into it you may want to revert to Christianity!
Though that's entirely your choice to look into it, just saying Christianity is confirmed truth.
If I got a dollar for every time a non-Muslim asked a Muslim about Hazrat Ayesha's (RA) "age of marriage problem", I would be a millionaire. If I got another dollar for everytime a non-Muslim asked so, didn't listen to the answer and ran away, I would be a trillionare.
Hey Kyle, I have just converted from protestantism to orthodoxy and I feel so much peace and guidance from the orthodox church, truly it is the unchanged, enduring church that Christ established.
Paul established*.
Christ thought everyone would be resurrected and the kingdom of God would arrive on Earth soon, before his generation died.
@@mrjayz94 Matthew 16:18 "And I tell you that you are Peter, and on this rock I will build my church, and the gates of Hades will not overcome it.". The Kingdom of God did arrive before his generation died, the pentecost within the Orthodox Church is the kingdom of God alive on Earth.
What was the main reason you decided to change over? Was it just more a "feeling" that you got/felt in the orthodox churches, or was it more of a "theological" reason based on scripture?
@@judet137 Jesus said all of the signs in Matthew 24/Mark 13/Luke 21 would happen before this generation passed and they didn’t; the prophecy failed. Jesus was an apocalypticist who preached that everyone would be resurrected and The Pentecost is not the Kingdom of God.
we dont have the same idea of prophecy as they had back then. the idea back then was that under certain conditions, as long as these conditions are met the prophecy will happen. Nowadays prophecies are viewed differently.@@mrjayz94
The parallel between "prophet" Muhammad and "prophet" John Smith is very strong.
Islam is the fastest growing religion on the planet, in fact one of its fastest growing segments are that of white British and European women averaging age 27
@@Checkeroute Complete lie. The growth of Islam is ALL birthrate and you don't report the apostacy numbers which we know are VERY LARGE because your Imams and Sheikhs keep complaining about it.
A Muslim's belief is to respect other beliefs. He does not impose himself on others. With simple logic. God is One. He issued His first book, which is the Torah, and He issued the second version of it, which is the Gospel, and then the third version, which is the Qur’an. A Muslim does not become a Muslim unless he believes in the Torah and the Gospel. Do you know that in the text of the Qur’an? Were Muslims the ones who established the Holocaust for the Jews? Were the Muslims the ones who waged the First and Second World Wars and are preparing for the third? Were the Muslims the ones who hit Japan with the nuclear bomb... Were there nuclear weapons in Iraq until it was destroyed... The human conscience must return because the destruction of the planet will be at your hands and not at the hands of the Muslims. Please take the correct knowledge from its owners. There are no media outlets that lie for the interests of tyrants. All my respect to you
@@kallaf1956 with all due respect Yes we are to believe in the books of the former prophets however we are only to believe and concur with the truth that remains therein - not the whole of those books because they had been corrupted.
The purpose of God sending Jesus with the Gospel (Injeel) to the Children of Israel was solely due to the corruption of their book (Torah) by their scribes and rabbis. In turn, the Gospel itself was also corrupted. The Bible as we know it today is not the pure unadulterated Gospel (and teachings) of Jesus - however, we are in agreement and hold steadfast to with what truth remains therein.
The Quran was the final Revelation that was sent to the totality of mankind for its guidance whereas the Torah and Gospel were for the Israelites.
@@Checkeroute *False on all counts*
Glory to Christ and his Holy Orthodox Catholic Church ☦️☝️
I see you everywhere, literally on every Christian video lol.
@@thebrits4743like a mosquito
yeah yeah yeah holy sprite keep yapping
5 seconds in and your video is already off to a goofy start, very telling about what the rest of your video will be like. Anyway, thanks for reminding me to pray Isha.
@Orthodox_Knight like most Muslims in the comment section
Your just mad that you got completely disproven
Your mad your religion got disproved.
@@Hannahplayzrobloz disproved how? Bet you can't point out a single thing 😂 Meanwhile you believe God is one yet your core belief system mentions 3 persons being one God...
Believing 3 separate persons are fully God is called polytheism. Ever wonder why Jews and Muslims are forbidden from praying in a Church but are permitted to pray in a Mosque and synagogue? It's cause you're the odd ones out of the 3 Abrahamic religions who came up with a 3 headed God and worship a man.
"Mad" lmao I'm more confused about where your logic runs off to on the topic of theology. Alhamdulillah I'm able to use my logic and basic math to deduct that one is one and cannot = 3 no matter how much mental gymnastics I do.
@@jiga1655 yes because they have god in them. The Holy Trinity,The father, The Son, and the holy spirt, are ONE ☝️!
Love your work! ❤
Share this video to family members and friends ❤️🙏🏾
Kyle is slowly turning into Jay Dyer
That is great, true blessing from God!
We just need an ironic soyface…
I'm personally agnostic and I see your points with errors, contradiction, and historical inaccuracy. Although aren't mostly all religions built off faith over evidence? Basically, putting trust in ancient testimonials and/or deeds made by followers or the god(s) themselves? I'm sure most of these ancient texts would have a degree of human error, or a sort of supernatural logic in which humans are unable to understand. Informative video, nonetheless. It's cool to see other religious viewpoints and arguments from differing perspectives from time to time.
not really. christianity is astonishingly correct in many historical ways. jesus crucification is one of the best documented events in ancient history
Bobby literally debunked the whole video
I was studying Islam during the former half of 2023. After looking into Christianity, I can wholeheartedly say that Islam is indeed false.
Can you explain why you think this?
it is false it doesn't make sense a cancer religion@@depresspresso84
@@depresspresso84 Contradictions in the Quran
Historical anachronisms
Scientific inaccuracies
Moral issues in the Quran and Hadith
Influence of pre-Islamic sources
@@depresspresso84 Issues with the concept of abrogation (later verses overriding earlier ones)
Alleged inconsistencies in the preservation of the Quranic text
Questionable authenticity of Hadiths
The problem of evil and suffering
The reliance on faith rather than evidence
The existence of numerous sects and interpretations within Islam
Criticisms of the concept of jihad
The portrayal of women in Islamic texts
Discrepancies in the biography of Prophet Muhammad
Theological challenges to the concept of Tawhid (absolute monotheism)
@@depresspresso84 Certainly:
16. Discrepancies in Quranic numerical claims
17. Conflict with modern human rights
18. Historical context of revelations
19. Variation in manuscripts
20. Lack of archaeological evidence
21. Philosophical challenges
22. Inconsistencies in early Islamic history
23. The problem of divine command theory
24. Lack of prophecies
25. Cultural and religious syncretism
Man thank you for strengthening my faith wallahi ur debunk is so satisfying especially all the mistakes u did that makes me even more muslim
He proved your religion was false. Find Christ brother/sista
@@Hannahplayzrobloz How did he prove?
bro i saw somwe christians lie about the bible to make it make sense
@@Terminator_Barcaso?
Does that make the bible false?
Thank You for the very informative video, Kyle. It's very interesting. Will you ever cover the books that you have behind you in your videos? Happy New Year!
3:14 The Quran does not say let Christians judge by the gospels. In Islam, they believe Jesus was given a book called The Gospel (al-injeel) similar to how Muhammad was given the Quran. It's not the gospels according to Matthew, Mark, Luke, and John.
There was no record that tells there is a gospel is a book that was given to Jesus. If Quran made it up then that's a different story. And Who gave you guys Quran? Angel Gabriel, not even allah himself, what if devil disguised into that angel and manipulated you all. And even if there is allah, Why would he make a huge mistake?, which is to send another last prophet or to simply change the whole story. Is your allah dumb, he didn't send any prophet for 600 years and sends mohammad after Jesus. Is your allah not able to plan for future and makes a messenger to a man who have committed a lot of sins. After 600 years, all of a sudden there is a rotten messenger and not even your so called allah gave him book but angel gabriel, look like you guys are hugely gambling on your faith on that fake angel
we're being told to judge by a long gone book then?
Imagine saying Jesus was given Quran when Quran was founded 600years are Jesus' death.
@@Doflaminguard they say it was a gospel, which means god news of the life and death of the messiah,
How come this famous ingill hasn't ever been found nor heard of. And if it was supposedly corrupted, did Allah's plan fail? He could have just made it incorruptible so then none would be confused.
Allah is the kind of guy who creates the problem and then sells the solution
When I started watching this video I was a devout muslim, after finishing it I had to pray fajr since your yap session took up my entire sleep schedule
@@bonk2575 lol
Womp womp
So you won’t refute a single argument he gave ahahahha
@@jovannikolic8032 muslims have no arguments
@@RenewedPerspective3626 Pretty much
ex-jw. i really feel for the muslim brothers and sisters able to break away from this cult. your life is literally in danger after the fact, and life will never be the same. it might be better, though. so much additional free time.
@JustinYiseverywhere 0.5% but who's counting
@JustinYiseverywhereI believe he means Jehovah's Witness
Bro trust me Islam had been debunked long time ago😅
How many books you have?
Islam is the same from the very beginning, unchanged
@@lawyer73 Tell that to Uthman
Any muslim who know islam will never convert to christain , i dont want to hurt any person feeling . can u give any avidence that trinity is in bible or how trinity make sence. I studied christainty but my understanding bible is corrupted and jesus never clam to be god and trinity is not in bible and trinity dont make sence etc etc. As my understand Islam is true and there is prove . go and reseach yourself which is the right path i m not saying covert to islam.
@@MegaDreamOobro this guy have blind faith.😂..Any muslim who know islam will never convert to christain , i dont want to hurt any person feeling . can u give any avidence that trinity is in bible or how trinity make sence. I studied christainty but my understanding bible is corrupted and jesus never clam to be god and trinity is not in bible and trinity dont make sence etc etc. As my understand Islam is true and there is prove . go and reseach yourself which is the right path i m not saying covert to islam.
Ephesians 4:31-32: “Let all bitterness and wrath and anger and clamor and slander be put away from you, with all malice, and be kind to one another, tenderhearted, forgiving one another, as God in Christ forgave you.”
Thank the lord for someone like you kyle, may god bless you❤️, I remembered to pray dohr because of you🌹 thank you for making islam spread lol
proud to be Christian 🙏🏻🙏🏻☦☦
Christianity is just as false as islam
Bobby literally debunked the whole video.
Well, don’t be prideful proud sir, hopefully there is a good proud instead of a sinful one, God bless whoever reads this, Amen!
Just reset my phone so this is a new account but i wanted to comment regardless. Mashallah, watching this increases my iman. For everyone else reading this, have faith. Jesus peace be upon him was our prophet and so is Muhammed peace be upon him. If you do your due diligence and reaearch for the truth, surely you will find it. Peace and blessings to you all. And if you want to argue against the points made in this video, feel free to do so i will try my best to explain.
How come if Christianity was first, and Islam 500 years after Christianity? How can he be called “a prophet”? He was the son of god
Thanks bro, really appreciate this video! Now ill be believing in Islam more then ever!
the funniest joke they claimining is that quran is the continuation of torah and that all of the prophets of israel are muslims
but they also claim that there was never a thing called israel and that torah is false
Not tryna be mean or fight, but being a muslim means submitting your will to god, so if u submit ur will to god ur a muslim, thats literally the definition of a muslim..and YES the torah came first then the quran, but people messed with the torah and edited it, changing a lot of stuff in the torah, but when God brought down rhe quran he had the Prhophet Muhammad and many others memorize it so thaf no one can get away with messing it up, so that means the quran is the updated and protected version of the torah
"Bro trust me I memorized it"
A "Muslim" literally translates to "the one who submits(to God).
@@Heartale.o torah has never been edited what's in torah is what's been written to the original 5 scriptures of moses
the torah literally said that there's someone that's GOD has spoken with when creating the human kind which is a direct contrary to your quran
@@Heartale.o and can you explain the claim of the muslim community that there have never been a country called israel but it is instead called palestine
Jesus drank alcohol before it was prohibited, even early islam didnt prohibit drinks ng its verses that came later that made it forbidden
it got later forbidden because of the Children of israel
Just watch DC Dawah...
BTW, thanks for strenghtening my iman bro!
DC Dawah's video was not good
He literally debunked this clown's arguments @@freedomclub2285
@vre7474 Which talking or flying donkey cult is the greatest
The name of Mecca is often claimed to be first recorded by the Greek geographer Ptolemy, who calls it Macoraba in the 2nd century AD.
However, this identification is not certain, and some scholars have argued that there are older accounts of Mecca than Ptolemy. For example, some have suggested that Mecca is mentioned in the Assyrian inscriptions of Tiglath-Pileser III (8th century BC) as Magan or Makan, a region ruled by the Arab queen Samsi. Others have proposed that Mecca is referred to in the Old Testament as Paran or Teman, places associated with Ishmael and his descendants. Still others have pointed out that Mecca is attested in some ancient South Arabian inscriptions as Makkah or Makkahum, meaning "temple" or "sanctuary".
One inscription from the 3rd century AD reads: "By ʿAthtar of Makkahum and by Almaqah of ʿAwwām and by Dhat-Ḥimyam and by Dhu-Samawi and by Dhat-Baʿdan. I am ʿAbd-Karib son of ʿAbd-Malik son of ʿAbd-Karib son of ʿAbd-Malik son of ʿAbd-Karib son of ʿAbd-Malik son of ʿAbd-Karib son of ʿAbd-Malik son of ʿAbd-Karib son of ʿAbd-Malik son of ʿAbd-Karib son of ʿAbd-Malik son of Ḥaṭṭab. I have made a vow to Makkahum for my life and for my children and for my clan." This inscription shows that Mecca was a place where people made vows and sought blessings from various gods.
Another inscription from the 4th century AD reads: "By Almaqah the lord and by Dhat-Ḥimyam and by Dhu-Samawi and by Dhat-Baʿdan. I am Ḥaṭṭab son of Ḥaṭṭab son of Ḥaṭṭab son of Ḥaṭṭab son of Ḥaṭṭab son of Ḥaṭṭab son of Ḥaṭṭab son of Ḥaṭṭab son of Ḥaṭṭab. I have given to Makkahum a gift: two camels with their saddles." This inscription shows that Mecca was a place where people gave gifts and donations to the temple. These inscriptions confirm that Mecca was a well-known and respected city in ancient South Arabia, and that its location was in the same valley surrounded by mountains as it is today.
@@ranro7371 Useful information... but wdym?
Was close to taking the shahada a year ago and now I couldn’t be further away
What stopped you from taking the shahada?
God@@GamePhyisician7
@@GamePhyisician7 Cause Islam is evil
@@lollolliiiso God stopped him from praising him? oof
@@zorgun2864More like God stopped him from worshipping a Demon and following a false prophet
Any Muslim who makes fun of Mormons for a “trust me bro” prophet is a hypocrite lmaooo
4:48
I couldn't stop myself from smiling like a villain or Doomguy when he is in front of a room full of demons ready to reap and tear them piece by piece when I saw the meme.
Who did the same as me?
Yes Brother 😂😂 God bless Kyle
You already kill a lot, Frank.
I know many Muslims whom wants to convert to Christ and they always ask me to take them out of their countries since there are not religion freedom in Islamic countries 😔, even tho my country is not rich they begged me to bring them here and save them from Islamic regime, i help them every time i can
Yes i have seen many videos about that too, islamic parents are Fake parents. So violent how can a father kill his own son that's what the Devil wish
“I know” , prolly 1/2 who doesn’t like not being able to consume alcohol, tempted by porks and cant gain income through onlyfans 😂
You help everyone, those who came to you for help, great man, but what makes me confused, about the many Muslims who wants to convert to Christianity, because of their poor financial conditions or what????
Pretty sure none of these "ex-muslims" practiced any prayer or read the Quran in their life, or maybe just reading a verse from the Quran and stopping at the middle of it before reading completely the whole thing.
@@antarctica6635 you're a muslim if you recite the Quran. You're an ex-muslim if you understand the Quran.
Thank you brother Kyle for your Amazing Videos you bring which guides everyone into truth and showing us the wrongdoers of this world! Hallelujah, May God grant you success!☦☦❤☝
☦❤❤❤СЛАВА БОГУ
Now from the point of view of both Christians and Muslims, Jesus is indeed the Messiah. Now If we compare the characteristics of Isaiah 42 with the life and teachings of Jesus as they are portrayed in the New Testament, then the Messiah Jesus falls short in fulfilling the prophecy. For example, Isaiah 42 states that the servant will not cry out:He will not shout or cry out, or raise his voice in the streets. [Isaiah 42:2] This disqualifies Jesus, who complained and literally cried out directly to GOD, according to the Bible, at many points in his ministry: From noon until three in the afternoon darkness came over all the land. About three in the afternoon Jesus cried out in a loud voice, “Eli, Eli, lema sabachthani?” (which means “My GOD, my GOD, why have you forsaken me?”). [Matthew 27:45-46]
Actually Jesus spoke Aramaic which is the language that was closely intertwined with Arabic. He said "Eli, Eli" which sounds a little like "Illa, illa" pretty much like "Illah" in Arabic.
No, it is not about Jesus. To understand the real identity, we must look at the translation done by the Jews, not the Christian version, because Isaiah is a Jewish book. Verse 53:3 says: Despised and rejected by men, a man of pains and accustomed to illness, and as one who hides his face from us, despised and we held him of no account.
Was Jesus despised by all men? Was he accustomed to illness (was he often sick?) does he hide his face from other people? Was he “held of no account”, meaning ignored by others? Clearly, the answer to the above questions is “No”. So this verse does not refer to Jesus.
Verse Isaiah 53:7 then states that he opened not his mouth. Wrong! Jesus spoke during his trial with both Pontius Pilot and the Jews. Verse 9 then says that he made his grave with the wicked and rich. Jesus did not make his grave, was buried alone. Yes I know he was meant to be buried like a criminal because he was considered one. But verse 9 says he was to be buried with both. Jesus was buried alone. It then goes on to say that God was please by bruising Jesus and that Jesus's seed would prolong the days in verses Isaiah 53:10-11. Jesus never had any seed.
Verse Isaiah 53:12 (which is where your case is strongest) states that his soul shall be poured out unto death. However in the Hebrew and Aramaic texts the word death is not present. Now again assuming this is Jesus (AS) this description fits the Islamic story much better. Jesus was not killed as the word for death is not present. He MAY have been put on the cross. And he was exalted and lifted up (the ascension). But again, this is clearly not Jesus as he does not fulfill this.
Jewish people reject the notion that Jesus is the Messiah; they are still awaiting the arrival of the Messiah. So from their perspective, the servant of Isaiah 42 stands as an unfulfilled prophecy of nearly three thousand years as their Messiah is yet to arrive. Now there is a serious issue with this understanding. We’ve already seen that the Prophet Muhammad (ﷺ) fulfils all the criteria mentioned in Isaiah 42, so the question must be asked: why would Isaiah set out criteria that can be fulfilled by individual (Prophet Muhammad) other than the Messiah, if it is indeed the Messiah to whom Isaiah 42 refers? If Isaiah is speaking of the Messiah, then we would expect that he would set out criteria that only the Messiah can fulfil. Otherwise it defeats the purpose of prophecy in the first place, because prophecies are supposed to be specific.
Also, one notices from the Gospel of John (1:19-21) that the Jews were waiting for the fulfillment of three distinct prophecies. And The 3rd was the coming of the Prophet (Muhammad ﷺ. An Arabian prophet mentioned in Isaiah 42:11 to fulfill the prophecies of Isaiah 42.)
This is obvious from the 3 questions that were posed to John the Baptist: “Now this was John’s testimony, when the Jews of Jerusalem sent priests and Levites to ask him who he was. He did not fail to confess, but confessed freely, “I am not the Christ.” They asked him, “Then who are you? Are you Elijah?” He said, “I am not.” “Are you the Prophet?” He answered, “No.” (John 1:19-21)
From this we conclude that Jesus Christ is not the prophet mentioned in Deuteronomy 18:18.
The first section of Isaiah 42, verses 1 - 17, describe a momentous servant in extremely positive terms, one who will be a “light for the Gentiles (non-jews/christians)” (42:6), will “open eyes that are blind” and “free people from darkness” (42:7) of idols worships. Isaiah 42:11 Even prophecies that This prophet will rise from the city of Medinah, Western Saudi Arabia. This is the righteous servant who will eliminate idolatry and spread justice (TRUE GOD's judgement) throughout the world 🌎.
Isaiah 42:21 Said that The God of Bible would magnify the Law to make people righteous. It's the hint about Al-Quran, Shariah Law.
Any sincere person that interprets Isaiah 42 consistently will see that it simply cannot apply to Jesus, regardless of whether one takes it as a reference to his first or second coming. The fact is that Prophet Muhammad (ﷺ) is the only person in history that has fulfilled all of the criteria set out in Isaiah 42.
In Isaiah 42:19 nation of Israel is explicitly identified as the blind and condemned people therefore the guiding and righteous servant (Prophet Muhammad ﷺ) must be someone (from the descendants of Ishmael, the Arabs) other than Israel.
Because they neglected Duetornomy 18:18 which also predected that this Prophet must have to come from among their brethren (their brother tribe; the Arabs).
Just who is this condemned servant? Isaiah makes it clear that the servant of condemnation is none other than the nation of Israel: Who is blind like the one in covenant with me, blind like the servant of the Lord? [Isaiah 42:19]
The “one in covenant with me” is a clear reference to the nation of Israel who were in covenant with God at the time Isaiah made this prophecy. Isaiah goes on to make it even more explicit: Who handed Jacob over to become loot, and Israel to the plunderers? [Isaiah 42:24]
Yes, Isaiah 42 17-25 describes the pagans and those Jews and christians who rejected the Last Prophet (Muhammad ﷺ) of Bible.
The Awaited Prophet Was to Come From Arabia: Deuteronomy 33:1-2 combines references to Moses, Jesus and Muhammad. It speaks of God (i.e. God’s revelation) coming from Sinai, rising from Seir (probably the village of Sa’ir near Jerusalem) and shining forth from Paran. According to Genesis 21:21, the wilderness of Paran was the place where Ishmael settled (i.e. Arabia, specifically Makkah).
The Old Testament also tells us that Ishmael dwelt in a place called Paran: "While he (Ishmael) was living in the Desert of Paran, his mother got a wife for him from Egypt." [Genesis 21:21]
We are told that Ishmael will have many descendants and that he will be “made into a great nation”: And as for Ishmael, I have heard you: I will surely bless him; I will make him fruitful and will greatly increase his numbers. He will be the father of 12 rulers, and I will make him into a great nation. [Genesis 17:20]
A great nation must refer to one led by a Prophet since this is greatness in GOD’s sight, not mere wealth or power rather it's spiritual, and not material..
That's why Isaiah talks about the rejoicing of the inhabitants of Kedar (2nd son of Ishmael),
New International Version
📖 Isaiah 42:11 Let the wilderness and its towns raise their voices; let the settlements where Kedar lives rejoice. Let the people of Sela (in Medina) sing for joy; let them shout from the mountaintops.
The Old Testament scholar Charles Foster also identifies the the "Land of Kedar" with ‘Hedjaz’ which is Western Saudi Arabia including its famous cities of Makkah and Madina. [Charles Foster, The historical geography of Arabia, P. 130]
KJV Isaiah 60:7 All the flocks of Kedar shall be gathered together unto thee, the rams of Nebaioth shall minister unto thee: they shall come up with acceptance on mine altar, and I will glorify the house of my glory."
Genesis 25:13 clearly states that Kedar and Nebaioth are sons of Ishmael (Alaihissalam).
Yes, because Bible clearly talks about the Hajj in Mekkha and the rising of Last Prophet prophet Muhammad (ﷺ) of Bible from Medinah, Saudi Arabia.
Prophet Muhammad (ﷺ), a descendant of Ishmael, is indeed this prophet. Because One of the earliest biographies of the Prophet Muhammad, Tabaqat Ibn Sa’d (d. 845 CE), documents one of the chains of genealogy, which confirms that the Prophet was a direct descendant of Ishmael through his second son Kedar.
Hayden’s Bible dictionary states: “Mohammad is said to have been of the Bene-Kedar [sons of Kedar]” [A Bible Dictionary, Hayden Series, edited by Rev. Charles Boutell, p. 386].
ua-cam.com/video/MfdNxRX6Dbs/v-deo.html
Kyle isnt a smart person please listen to this video if you want to clear up on your mind about Islam.
Kyle fails on his accusations and this video explains it well
2/10 yap sesh@@ProphetMuhammadinBibleisaiah42
Hallemybutthole
Islam: older than hinduism
Source: "trust me bro"
Ever sence adam as was born, islam was born
@@MaskmanGaming69 you need archealogical proof dumbo.This way i can claim the first human adam was actually adamh and was a hindu sage lol. Without proof it is just a myth
He was not born.Evolution took place u fool@@MaskmanGaming69
@@MaskmanGaming69
So adam is a failure prophet?
@@MaskmanGaming69he was never born
Being called an idolater is rich coming from someone whose religion's central part is a faceless cube with 0 symbolism along with a black rock inside an aluminium vulva. When you point that out, they suddenly discern veneration and worship.
It doesn't matter what a pipe said. Catholicism is false.
An idolator worships a depiction of their god. Islam tells us to pray towards the Ka'aba not to it.
@@nahzea so kissing and venerating a faceless object that has 0 symbolism is less of an idolatry than venerating a depiction of a God that helps us in prayers and communication? Great logic.
@@bljet4388 there's a difference between veneration and worship. In worship you submit to whatever it is you are worshipping. We don't submit to the Ka'abah, we submit to Allah, the owner of the Ka'abah. We venerate the Ka'abah for it's significance.
Also, people touch and kiss the black stone for religious purposes: it can act as an expiation of sins due to Allah forgiving the sins which have been absorbed by the stone (search up about how the black stone became black if you want to know more about it), it is a miracle of God, and it is the cornerstone of the Ka'abah, etc.
This is just from the best of my knowledge, but Allah knows best.
@@nahzeabro your hero married a 6 year old 🤡
If Christ did not die on the cross, God's poetic and beautiful nature is quelled. From a living tree came death, but thanks to God from a dead tree (the cross) came ever lasting life.
How does god die
@@C__667 Because Jesus was God in the flesh and he sacrificed himself.
@@C__667 Cuz he was stripped away from his Divinity and put himself on the place of a man.
The Bible proves that Muhammad (saws) is a true Prophet!
-
[The word "Prophet" comes from the word "prophecy"]
-
Deuteronomy 18:22
"If a prophet speaks in the name of the Lord but the thing does not take place or prove true, it is a word that the Lord has not spoken."
-
In the previous verse, it is asked how one can distinguish a TRUE prophet from a FALSE prophet.
-
The answer was that only a TRUE prophet makes prophecies that ACTUALLY happen.
-
And you know what? Muhammad (saws) made HUNDREDS of prophecies that are very precise and yet ACTUALLY happened!
Oh boy. I hope ur prepared to get flammed for this one Kyle
Never ask a Christian how old Rebecca was