Islam is a FALSE Religion!
Вставка
- Опубліковано 27 чер 2024
- ✨pray for Muslims! ✨
Discord - / discord
Twitter - / orthodoxkyle
Instagram - / kyleorthodox
Support - / kyleorthodox
00:00 Errors
06:39 Plagiarized
12:20 Quran
20:15 Language
22:16 Creation
29:22 Incarnation
Without lies, Islam dies.
Hello brother in Christ
@@Orthodox_Knighthello! God bless!
I can clear all your doubts, If you want.
@@AliTanoli-cq3js respond to the arugments in this video, islam has no continiutiy with ancient judaism or christiantiy, is evidently false, and had to lie about the bible being corrupted after the fact to justify this,
@@buffcommie942 Islam has continuity with islam, and previous prophets not judaism, and christianity that are misled groups, and If you think bible is not corrupted then tell me who authored it, the proof of that and why there are 6 different bibles
Islam, the biggest trust me bro worldview in the world.
They call Christians Polytheists even tho Allah prays 😂
Its literally the biggest troll in history
It's a shame, because islam is the biggest sham in history that deceives even supposedly sane people in the west on a continual basis.
I can tell you don't know about Islam, I am here if you want to clear any doubts
@@AliTanoli-cq3js why did mohammed marry a 6 year old
Thanks man, i was a muslim for 16 years, and after watching this video, i went to pray asr
Praise the Lord!
Best reaction
Lol 😂😂
@@rufinomedado3184Yes Praise Allah All Glory and Majesty to be him
Did you also marry a 6yo?
@@OllieBrady-kp9fx Woodworshipper Comedi successfully failed
The parallel between "prophet" Muhammad and "prophet" John Smith is very strong.
Islam is the fastest growing religion on the planet, in fact one of its fastest growing segments are that of white British and European women averaging age 27
@@Checkeroute Complete lie. The growth of Islam is ALL birthrate and you don't report the apostacy numbers which we know are VERY LARGE because your Imams and Sheikhs keep complaining about it.
A Muslim's belief is to respect other beliefs. He does not impose himself on others. With simple logic. God is One. He issued His first book, which is the Torah, and He issued the second version of it, which is the Gospel, and then the third version, which is the Qur’an. A Muslim does not become a Muslim unless he believes in the Torah and the Gospel. Do you know that in the text of the Qur’an? Were Muslims the ones who established the Holocaust for the Jews? Were the Muslims the ones who waged the First and Second World Wars and are preparing for the third? Were the Muslims the ones who hit Japan with the nuclear bomb... Were there nuclear weapons in Iraq until it was destroyed... The human conscience must return because the destruction of the planet will be at your hands and not at the hands of the Muslims. Please take the correct knowledge from its owners. There are no media outlets that lie for the interests of tyrants. All my respect to you
@@kallaf1956 with all due respect Yes we are to believe in the books of the former prophets however we are only to believe and concur with the truth that remains therein - not the whole of those books because they had been corrupted.
The purpose of God sending Jesus with the Gospel (Injeel) to the Children of Israel was solely due to the corruption of their book (Torah) by their scribes and rabbis. In turn, the Gospel itself was also corrupted. The Bible as we know it today is not the pure unadulterated Gospel (and teachings) of Jesus - however, we are in agreement and hold steadfast to with what truth remains therein.
The Quran was the final Revelation that was sent to the totality of mankind for its guidance whereas the Torah and Gospel were for the Israelites.
As an ex-Mormon I empathize a lot with ex-Muslims. That pain, that familial pressure and ultimate rejection if you leave. I know I lost everything when I left...EVERYTHING. I pray for this brave one, God bless you brother ✝
Be blessed
Welcome home brother. Islam and Mormonism are actually very similar - there's been a lot of scholarship done about that. Glad to have you in the Church though ☦️
Bruh
You were a Mormon? Gosh...
Schlözer in his preparation for the Arabia expedition in 1781 coined the term Semitic language:
"From the Mediterranean to the Euphrates, from Mesopotamia to Arabia ruled one language, as is well known. Thus Syrians, Babylonians, Hebrews, and Arabs were one people (ein Volk). Phoenicians (Hamites) also spoke this language, which I would like to call the Semitic (die Semitische)."
-Before Boas: The Genesis of Ethnography and Ethnology in the German By Han F. Vermeulen
He was only half right though, Arabic is the only corollary to "proto-semitic", infact the whole semitic classification is nonsensical for anyone with a somewhat functioning mass between their ears. hebrew, aramaic, rest of madeup dialect continua only have 22 letters of the 29 protosemitic letters Arabic has all 29. The difference betweeen Arabic and the other creoles and Pidgin is the same as that between Latin and pig latin or italian.
|Classical Arabic | 28 consonants, 29 with Hamza and 6 vowels; some consonants are emphatic or pharyngealized; some vowels are marked with diacritics | Complex system of word formation based on roots and patterns; roots are sequences of consonants that carry the basic meaning of a word; patterns are sequences of vowels and affixes that modify the meaning and function of a word | Flexible word order, but VSO is most common; SVO is also possible; subject and object are marked by case endings (-u for nominative, -a for accusative, -i for genitive); verb agrees with subject in person, number, and gender; verb has different forms for different moods and aspects |
| Akkadian | 22 consonants and 3 vowels; some consonants are glottalized or palatalized; vowels are not marked | Similar system, but with different roots and patterns; some roots have more than three consonants; some patterns have infixes or reduplication | Fixed word order of SVO; subject and object are not marked by case endings, but by prepositions or word order; verb agrees with subject in person, number, and gender; verb has different forms for different tenses and aspects |
| Aramaic | 22 consonants and 3 vowels (later variants have more); no emphatic or pharyngealized consonants (except in some dialects); vowels are not marked (except in later variants such as Syriac) | Simple system of word formation based on prefixes and suffixes; some roots or patterns exist, but are less productive than in Arabic or Akkadian |
"Semitic" is just mumbled Arabic, really. Imagine English with a third of its letters removed and simplified grammar. That's Aramaic, Hebrew, etc. For example, combine T and D into just T; there's no need to have 2 letters. The same goes for i, e, y - they should all be just y from now on, etc., etc. Arabic is the only corollary to proto-Semitic. In fact, the whole classification of Semitic languages is nonsensical for anyone with a somewhat functioning brain. Hebrew, Aramaic, and the rest of these made-up dialect continua only have 22 letters out of the 29 proto-Semitic letters. Arabic has all 29. The difference between Arabic and the other creoles and Pidgin is the same as the difference between Latin and pig Latin or Italian. "Phoenician" is an Arabic dialect continuum, and not only that, it is pidgin. It is simplified to the point of stupidity. Anyone with a basic knowledge of Arabic would see this clearly. What happened was that Arabic handicapped "scholars" saw the equivalent of Scottish Twitter spelling, with added mumbling due to phonemic mergers (22 letters, not 29), and mistakenly thought they were seeing a different language."
Let's start with a simple sentence:
## The house is big
Arabic:
البيتُ كبيرٌ
al-bayt-u kabīr-un
Proto-Semitic:
*ʔal-bayt-u kabīr-u
Hebrew:
הבית גדול
ha-bayit gadol
Akkadian:
bītum rabûm
Amharic:
ቤቱ ገደሉ
betu gedelu
As can be seen, Arabic and Proto-Semitic have the same word order (noun-adjective), the same definite article (al-), and the same case endings (-u for nominative). Hebrew and Akkadian have lost the case endings and changed the definite article (ha- and -um respectively). Amharic has changed the word order (adjective-noun) and the definite article (u-).
But Arabic is not only similar to Proto-Semitic, it is also pre-Semitic, meaning that it is the original form of Semitic before it split into different branches. This is because Arabic preserves many features that are not found in any other Semitic language, but are found in other Afro-Asiatic languages, such as Egyptian and Berber. These features include:
- The definite article al-, which is derived from the demonstrative pronoun *ʔal- 'that'. This article is unique to Arabic among Semitic languages, but it is similar to the article n- in Berber and the article p-, t-, n- in Egyptian.
- The dual number for nouns and verbs, which is marked by the suffix -ān or -ayn. This number is rare in other Semitic languages, but it is common in other Afro-Asiatic languages, such as Egyptian and Berber.
- The imperfective prefix t- for verbs, which indicates the second person singular feminine or third person plural feminine. This prefix is unique to Arabic among Semitic languages, but it is similar to the prefix t- in Berber and Egyptian.
- The passive voice for verbs, which is marked by the infix t between the first and second root consonants. This voice is unique to Arabic among Semitic languages, but it is similar to the passive voice in Egyptian and Berber.
Finally, a more complex sentence: The letter was written with a pen.
Arabic:
كُتِبَتِ الرِّسَالَةُ بِالقَلَمِ
kutiba-t al-risāla-t-u bi-l-qalam-i
Proto-Semitic:
*kutiba-t ʔal-risāla-t-u bi-l-qalam-i
Hebrew:
המכתב נכתב בעט
ha-michtav niktav ba-et
Akkadian:
šipram šapāru bēlum
Egyptian:
sḏm.n.f p-ẖry m rnp.t
Berber:
tturra-t tibratin s uccen
Here, Arabic and Proto-Semitic have the same word order (verb-subject-object), the same passive voice marker (-t-), the same definite article (al-), and the same preposition (bi-). Hebrew has changed the word order (subject-verb-object), lost the passive voice marker, changed the definite article (ha-) and the preposition (ba-). Akkadian has changed the word order (object-subject-verb), lost the passive voice marker, changed the definite article (-um) and the preposition (bēlum).
Now how is it that the Qur'an came thousands of years in a language that is lexically, syntactically, phonemically, and semantically older than the oldest recorded writing?
Now how is it that the Qur'an came thousands of years later in an alphabet that had never been recorded before, and in the highest form the language had ever taken?
The creator is neither bound by time nor space, therefore the names are uttered as they truly were, in a language that is lexically, syntactically, phonemically, and semantically older than the oldest recorded writing. In fact, that writing appears to have been a simplified version of it. Not only that, but it would be the equivalent of the greatest works of any particular language all appearing in one book, in a perfect script and in the highest form the language could ever take. It is so high in fact, that it had yet to be surpassed despite the fact that over the last millennium the collection of Arabic manuscripts when compared on word-per-word basis in Western Museums alone, when they are compared with the collected Greek and Latin manuscripts combined, the latter does not constitute 1 percent of the former as per German professor Frank Griffel, in addition all in a script that had never been recorded before. Thus, the enlightenment of mankind from barbarism and savagery began, and the age of reason and rationality was born from its study.
God did bring down the Qur’an, Mohamed is his Messenger.
Christian: makes a slight critique of islam
Muslims: "It's not the eyes that are blind, but the hearts 😭😭"
because its true
Don't forget, and you christians are "rude asf" too!
Ngl bro Muhammad critiques got all killed
😅😅
Nah usually they ended up beheaded
@@younglingslayer1 😂
Those who deny Jesus will also be denied by Jesus on the day of Judgment. Stay strong my brothers in Christ, hope our muslim bros will understand too ☦️
0:01 is absolutely diabolical💀
Can't believe I used to consider becoming a Muslim.
same brother
Same here 😔
Its perfectly made to deceive unsure believers
Same here but I have decided to help people who also have converted who are being misleaded and lie tell by muslim about who amazing is Allah I will save them
Real Abraham Lincoln?????
Somebody said Jesus was Muslim because Mary wore a hijab😭 Hijab is the Arabic word for Veil, and people wore veils LONG before islam
Tell that guy that he is being stupid
May Allah guide you
@@G06LlN maly allah guide your wife to me
@@groundzero5708 may Allah guide your daughter into my bed
Jesus is Muslim because he submitted to god. The definition of a Muslim is one who submits to god.
@@Fred61378Jesus was Jewish
after watching this video, i wanna say a big thank you i cant express how much i thank you for reminding me to pray my dhuhr i almost forget lemme go make dhikr stay safe.
lessssssgooooooo finally found someone that thinks alike
bro same
Peace be upon you brother❤
salam alaikum, may Allah bless you all
Alhamdulillah we are having our own little party here
Thank you so much bro, I went to my local mosque and started praying to Allah SWT that I was born a muslim because of this video.
Ohh yea I just received your prayer you prayed to me (PEACE BE UPON ME) i will grant u jannah
If you fill 3 cups with water.
You will have the same water inside the three cups.
Trinity.
@@DelmaRufinodaSilva so basically playstation 1, 2, and 3 are all still playstation 😂😂😂
@@user-lo6jg6kj7o no
anyway lets talking about muhammad being a pedo
hes coming after ur little sister muhammad is coming for ur sister whos 6 but its ok 🥰 peace be upon him right 😂
Thank you for debunking this false religion. Your video about sneako has helped me turn some of my Muslim friends into Christians! God bless you Kyle , greetings from Greece 🇬🇷☦️
That's great to hear!
Glory to God
Ah yes, sneako, the same individual that was taught gun anatomy lessons by Penguinz0.
i ve been trying to convert my "muslim" friend who doesnt even know anything about islam and when i proved to him that muhammed had sex with aisha when she was 9 he tried to justify it and i was like bruhhhhhh
@@kosmqshar1239 some Muslims try to excuse Muhammad for having sex with Aisha by saying Isaac married Rebecca whe she was 3 💀💀💀
Amazing bro! Keep go on :)
I'am an ex-muslim atheist but i'am interested in christianity, so i would love to see more videos on Islam
You can Watch AskCliff , Christian prince, sam shamoun, David wood. God bless you brother for finding the true Path. ✝ ❤
Feel free to reach out if you need someone to talk to bro :) maybe go check out an Orthodox Church nearby. Any in your area?
I will add, jay Smith, lloyd dejong, Ahmed ex muslim, and the speakers corners soco channel.
Jay Dyer slaughters the deeply flawed metaphysics of Islam.
We need more ex muslim spread awareness everywhere 🙏🏾
1:29 This graphic is false.
1. Islam has a liturgy. The 5 prayers are formulaic and follow a very precise pattern, reading certain chapters, doing certain motions, etc.
2. Atoning sacrifice is iffy, an animal is slaughtered as a sacrifice during Eid Al-Fitr annually. Idk what is meant here.
3. Islam has feast days, Eid Al-Fitr and Eid Al-Adha with another Mawlid An-nabi being a third but is not universally agreed upon.
4. Mosques are very symbolic, featuring places for ritual washing (wudhu) and to pray facing the Kaaba.
5. Divine immanence exists in sufi Islam but is not mainstream - sufi is a dimension in Islam, not a separate branch.
6. Restricted access to laity: At my local mosque, there's a sign on the front door that says only believing Muslims should come in. I've heard stories of European muslim converts being denied entry to mosques in the Middle East until they could prove they're Muslim.
7. The last point is ridiculous. Islam has many ritual elements, it's TOO ritualistic. There's even a ritualistic way to drink water and trim your nails!
I'm not Muslim but that graphic is very ignorant about Islam.
learn the queeran, muslima
@@donhue4546 Are you stupid?
@@donhue45463 in 1 shampoo😂😂😂
@@simsim9755 dooooooooooooooooooo u use that,donnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnntu need hair,
@@simsim9755 aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaar you sayn theres 4 gods
Thanks man I really needed that, now I gotta go pray Tahajjud
😂❤
Jesus loves us all
Tahajjud deez nuts
“Allah” waiting 600 years to tell people Jesus didn’t die on the Cross:
😂
Edit: I started a war
If you want to know about Islam, hit me up
@@AliTanoli-cq3jseverything about Islam is all over the internet , you can literally go right now and read Quran and Hadith . Why would we need a random Muslim to tell us his version of Islam? If you want to know about Jesus hit ME up 🤙 I will prove to you that our Bible is not corrupted, and that Muslims only say this to explain half the stuff in their religion that makes no sense. I have compassion for many Muslims, many are decent people and they truly do not know the truth and are encouraged not to look, they are controlled by FEAR that if they even QUESTION “Allah” and Quran and Mohammad it is dangerous 😂 how can it be wrong to use the brain Allah gave you?? Islam is false my friend, religion that came over 600 years after Christ and is a hodge podge of mystic, gnostic, kabbalistic, heretical teachings that were thriving in Arabia at the time of false prophet Mohammad. Many signs that he was demon possessed and not a true prophet Of God, coming from Muslim own sources. THINK!! REPENT!! and come to YESHUA the messiah, God with us, the savior of mankind and son of God , the true LIVING WORD OF GOD 💜
😂😂😂😂😂😂😂exactly!
Fr 😂
@@AliTanoli-cq3jsYeah doing Taqqiya is okay for you
Thank you. I was a Muslim for 20 years. After watching the video, I became a Muslim
Then we should spread this everywhrere - people will convert into islam like crazy. Muslim, finish your primary school properly and start thinking on your own!
This comment makes no sense just like your religion
@@zephyruswild638fr tho ahahahaha
Lmao Alhamdulillah
Fools are obstinate no matter what
i was a muslim for 14 years, i read the quran twice everyday, i prayed all 5 prayers and i didnt do anything forbidden, until i saw this video, then i started reading the quran 3 times a day, thank you sir for increasing my imaan 🙏
sad.
@@Sunkist1776 what's sad? Most of these claims are just "your religion is wrong because my book that's been updates 300 times and has many contradictions said so)"
@@Rawenhappy2exactly bro, this guy's literally saying "the Qur'an is wrong because the bible says so". Subhanallah what is this😂
@@Rawenhappy2Correct me if im wrong, Muhammad married a 6 year old
Brother . Please watch this video once per day so that you can increase your iman even more !
It was just June of this year, I was very confused with what I wanted to do with my life . I was raised Hindu but found the faith way too mystic and fake so I decided to convert but I was confused that should I go to Islam or Christianity.I wanted to take up Islam because of its strong position in India and Muslims saying how scientific it is but then I saw one of your videos debunking Islam. And the one fact that the Bible predicted the Quran made me turn fully to Christianity. Thank You Kyle ☦️☦️
God is great
Happy you for you!
Same
Glad you converted to Christianity brother, im praying for your growth in Christ 🙏 God bless you
AMEN brother! you have been called to Christ 💜☦️
Matthew 16:24 Then Jesus told his disciples, “If anyone would come after me, let him deny himself and take up his cross and follow me. 25 For whoever would save his life will lose it, but whoever loses his life for my sake will find it. 26 For what will it profit a man if he gains the whole world and forfeits his soul? Or what shall a man give in return for his soul?
Jesus is calling out to His flock all over the world right now. Take heart, you are loved immensely by God. But God loves all His creation, and many of them do not know this. Many Muslims walking the earth today having no idea that Jesus died for their sins.
May you be a light to others and bring the love, Joy and peace of Christ to the people around you.
The "new" Muslims movement on youtube literally devolves into r/atheist arguments
because in the end there will only islam and atheism. it's in islamic eschatology.
@@begobolehsjwjangan2359 "We're just gonna kill em!" ~ Prophet Muhammad (PBUH)
@@begobolehsjwjangan2359 No, it'll be Islam, Christianity, and the followers of the anti-Christ. We actually believe some Christians (not all) will be on the good guy side. But when Jesus returns the Christians will become Muslim.
@@begobolehsjwjangan2359Which means Islam by itself can’t stand so had to use kafir arguments to try and debunk Christianity which in turn just as well debunks their entire religion since in their own book, it relies on the Bible for its authenticity of passing down this “continuity” of prophecy (Sura 5.66, 5.68 as blatant examples). It is easy to see the fraud Muhammad was.
@@begobolehsjwjangan2359😂😂lol not .there arguments about atheist are so dumped
bro learned islam from his local mcdonalds 💀💀💀
I dip your crappy book in bacon grease
He learned it from that playboy magazine of yours
Bro fr learned Islam from the back of his license plate.💀
@@pulaski5220hope Allah guides you from your disease called ignorance
@@oshadhagamage8821you shouldn't be talking mr "Jesus dIEd fOR oUr sIns"
Thank you so much! You just reminded me how grateful i am for being a muslim and to get back on my prayer
This is not the flex you think it is. It's very sad that it will literally take a miracle for the blind to see
Cope
@@sadiez11I love how the blind guy tells another blind guy to open his eyes and see god 😂😂😂😂😂 ur basically saying my book has more words than yours therefore mine is the absolute truth... Why don't you guys try reading the Emerald tablets
@@ttru4426 Lol how presumptuous! Am I the blind guy? And I never mentioned anything about "my book"
I do read the emerald tablets actually and sumerian texts and the apocrypha and lots more.
It's silly to assume that anyone who criticizes Islam is a Christian. I align with Christ consciousness, NOT with Christianity or the bible
What really matters is that you can examine the criticisms in this video about the creation of Islam and still be confident in your beliefs. Islam copies older non religious texts and has a limited scope for the time period and locality that doesn’t suggest any divine inspiration or additional bestowing of knowledge. It’s not a strong basis for belief, so you will be relying heavily on faith.
The Danish scholar Patricia Crone wanted to write a book on Meccan trade leading up to the beginning of Islam, since Islam describes Mecca as a major trade route hub, the oldest place of human habitation on earth. She ran into a problem, namely, there is no evidence that Mecca existed until after Mohammed would have died. No trade documents, it's not on any maps until centuries after Islam is supposed to begun, it's not on any trade route. The place is more of a hole-in-the-wall, a robbers roost, a hiding place in the middle of nowhere.
We have no archaeological proof of Moses existence, and if he did exist we have no proof of when that might have been.
The only books that speak of Moses are the books of the Jews (then the books of the Christians and Muslims of course) and were written a long time after his supposed lifetime. Yet other local cultures, who generally liked to write and leave traces, have never spoken of a guy who led 2 million people across the sea and the desert. In fact, to go a step further, archaeology would tend to go against most of the information that's told about Moses, since it's often anacronistic, inaccurate or inconsistent with one another.
I guess all Abrahamic religions are false since archaeology can't prove the existence of the original prophet, right?
Nice fantasy , The name of Mecca is often claimed to be first recorded by the Greek geographer Ptolemy, who calls it Macoraba in the 2nd century AD.
However, this identification is not certain, and some scholars have argued that there are older accounts of Mecca than Ptolemy. For example, some have suggested that Mecca is mentioned in the Assyrian inscriptions of Tiglath-Pileser III (8th century BC) as Magan or Makan, a region ruled by the Arab queen Samsi. Others have proposed that Mecca is referred to in the Old Testament as Paran or Teman, places associated with Ishmael and his descendants. Still others have pointed out that Mecca is attested in some ancient South Arabian inscriptions as Makkah or Makkahum, meaning "temple" or "sanctuary".
One inscription from the 3rd century AD reads: "By ʿAthtar of Makkahum and by Almaqah of ʿAwwām and by Dhat-Ḥimyam and by Dhu-Samawi and by Dhat-Baʿdan. I am ʿAbd-Karib son of ʿAbd-Malik son of ʿAbd-Karib son of ʿAbd-Malik son of ʿAbd-Karib son of ʿAbd-Malik son of ʿAbd-Karib son of ʿAbd-Malik son of ʿAbd-Karib son of ʿAbd-Malik son of ʿAbd-Karib son of ʿAbd-Malik son of Ḥaṭṭab. I have made a vow to Makkahum for my life and for my children and for my clan." This inscription shows that Mecca was a place where people made vows and sought blessings from various gods.
Another inscription from the 4th century AD reads: "By Almaqah the lord and by Dhat-Ḥimyam and by Dhu-Samawi and by Dhat-Baʿdan. I am Ḥaṭṭab son of Ḥaṭṭab son of Ḥaṭṭab son of Ḥaṭṭab son of Ḥaṭṭab son of Ḥaṭṭab son of Ḥaṭṭab son of Ḥaṭṭab son of Ḥaṭṭab. I have given to Makkahum a gift: two camels with their saddles." This inscription shows that Mecca was a place where people gave gifts and donations to the temple. These inscriptions confirm that Mecca was a well-known and respected city in ancient South Arabia, and that its location was in the same valley surrounded by mountains as it is today.
Macoraba is not Mecca, nice try.
Greek has a limited ability of capturing Arabic it is infact Markorava (Μακόραβα) and not Macroba as is often localized Greek is known to morph to suit tongue of speakers, the word for Jesus as his name is often misspelled due to the lack of the ayin sound in Greek, which was rendered to Iesous, coupling the nearest sound to ayin, same letter found in 'Iraq', which sounds entirely different in Arabic form 'Iran' in Arabic, with the -ous Greek suffix that Greeks typically add to their names 'HerodotOS', 'PlotinUS', 'AchelOUS' and later mumbled into a J. The original is "Isa" as it is in the Quran Arabic.
The yeshua rendition of Isa (his name in the Qur'an) PBUH which is purported to be the name of Jesus is KNOWN to had been taken from greek. Western Syriac also use "Isho". Western Aramaic (separate from Syriac which is a dialect of Eastern Aramaic) use "Yeshu". Western Syriac has been separate from Western Aramaic for about 1000 years. And sounds don't even match up. Syriac is a Christian liturgical language yet the four letters of the name of Jesus «ܝܫܘܥ» [ = Judeo-Babylonian Aramaic: «ישוע» ] sounds totally different in West vs East Syriac, viz. vocalized akin to Christian Arabic, Hebrew, Aramaic «ܝܶܫܽܘܥ» (Yēšūʿ) in West Syriac, but pronounced more akin to Muslim Arabic Quran character name Isa in East Syriac «ܝܑܼܫܘܿܥ» (ʾĪšōʿ). The reason for this confusion is their dropping of phonemes as aforementioned. Only someone that has no idea what the letters are or how they sound would have a name ending in a pharyngeal fricative like the ayin, if it were to be used in a name it would have had to be in the beginning, thus the Arabic rendition is the correct one.
In addition, The word God in hebrew is eloah, is a cognate of the Arabic I-L-H, pronounced ilah not eloah. Hebrew dropped the glottal stop and mumbled it into eloh, aramic mumbled a little less and it became elah. Infact it is written A-L-H in Arabic, it is pronounced i in Arabic cause it is an Alef with hamza below (إ أ ) They are two different forms of Alef.
And it mean "a god", it is the non definitive form of A-L-L-H, in which the Alef is without a glottal stop/hamza,(ا)
Schlözer in his preparation for the Arabia expedition in 1781 coined the term Semitic language:
"From the Mediterranean to the Euphrates, from Mesopotamia to Arabia ruled one language, as is well known. Thus Syrians, Babylonians, Hebrews, and Arabs were one people (ein Volk). Phoenicians (Hamites) also spoke this language, which I would like to call the Semitic (die Semitische)."
-Before Boas: The Genesis of Ethnography and Ethnology in the German By Han F. Vermeulen
He was only half right though, Arabic is the only corollary to "proto-semitic", infact the whole semitic classification is nonsensical for anyone with a somewhat functioning mass between their ears. hebrew, aramaic, rest of madeup dialect continua only have 22 letters of the 29 protosemitic letters Arabic has all 29. The difference betweeen Arabic and the other creoles and Pidgin is the same as that between Latin and pig latin or italian.
"protosemetic" Alphabet (29), Arabic Alphabet (28), Latin transliteration, hebrew (22)
𐩠 𐩡 𐩢 𐩣 𐩤 𐩥 𐩦 𐩧 𐩨 𐩩 𐩪 𐩫 𐩬 𐩭 𐩮 𐩰 𐩱 𐩲 𐩳 𐩴 𐩵 𐩶 𐩷 𐩸 𐩹 𐩺 𐩻 𐩼
ا ب ت ث ج ح خ د ذ ر ز س ش ص ض ط ظ ع غ ف ق ك ل م ن ه و ي
A b t ṯ j h kh d ḏ r z s sh ṣ ḍ ṭ ẓ ʿ ġ f q k l m n h w y
א ב ג ד ה ו ז ח ט י כ ל מ נ ס ע פ צ ק ר ש ת
Merged phonemes in hebrew and aramaic:
ح, خ (h, kh) merged into only kh consonant remain
س, ش (s, sh) merged into only Shin consonant remaining
ط, ظ (ṭ/teth, ẓ) merged into only ṭ/teth consonant remaining
ص, ض (ṣ, ḍ/Tsad ) merged into only ḍ/Tsad consonant remaining
ع, غ (3'ayn, Ghayn) merged into a reducted ayin consonant remaining
ت, ث (t/taw, th) merged into only t/taw consonant remaining
This kind of nuance is lost in the dialect continua. As a matter of fact, all of the knowledge needed for deciphering ancient texts and their complexity was derived from the Qur'an. It was by analyzing the syntactic structure of the Qur'an that the Arabic root system was developed. This system was first attested to in Kitab Al-Ayin, the first intralanguage dictionary of its kind, which preceded the Oxford English dictionary by 800 years. It was through this development that the concept of Arabic roots was established and later co-opted into the term 'semitic root,' allowing the decipherment of ancient scripts. In essence, they quite literally copied and pasted the entirety of the Arabic root. Hebrew had been dead, as well as all the other dialects of Arabic, until being 'revived' in a Frankensteinian fashion in the 18th and 19th centuries.
The entire region spoke basically the same language, with mumbled dialect continuums spread about, and Arabic is the oldest form from which all these dialects branched off. As time passed, the language gradually became more degenerate, and then the Qur'an appeared with the oldest possible form of the language thousands of years later. This is why the Arabs of that time were challenged to produce 10 similar verses, and they couldn't. People think it's a miracle because they couldn't do it, but I think the miracle is the language itself. They had never spoken Arabic, nor has any other language before or since had this mathematical precision. And when I say mathematical, I quite literally mean mathematical.
|Classical Arabic | 28 consonants, 29 with Hamza and 6 vowels; some consonants are emphatic or pharyngealized; some vowels are marked with diacritics | Complex system of word formation based on roots and patterns; roots are sequences of consonants that carry the basic meaning of a word; patterns are sequences of vowels and affixes that modify the meaning and function of a word | Flexible word order, but VSO is most common; SVO is also possible; subject and object are marked by case endings (-u for nominative, -a for accusative, -i for genitive); verb agrees with subject in person, number, and gender; verb has different forms for different moods and aspects |
| Akkadian | 22 consonants and 3 vowels; some consonants are glottalized or palatalized; vowels are not marked | Similar system, but with different roots and patterns; some roots have more than three consonants; some patterns have infixes or reduplication | Fixed word order of SVO; subject and object are not marked by case endings, but by prepositions or word order; verb agrees with subject in person, number, and gender; verb has different forms for different tenses and aspects |
| Aramaic | 22 consonants and 3 vowels (later variants have more); no emphatic or pharyngealized consonants (except in some dialects); vowels are not marked (except in later variants such as Syriac) | Simple system of word formation based on prefixes and suffixes; some roots or patterns exist, but are less productive than in Arabic or Akkadian |
Classical Arabic has more consonants and vowels than other semitic languages, and that it preserves some sounds that were lost or changed in other semitic languages. This means that classical Arabic can encode more information in a given unit of speech than other semitic languages, and that it is closer to the original sound system of protosemitic., we can see that classical Arabic has more grammatical features than the other languages, such as case endings, mood endings, and root and pattern system. These features make classical Arabic more expressive and precise than the other languages, as it can convey more information and nuances in a single word or phrase. Classical Arabic is also more flexible than the other languages, as it can use different word orders and verb forms to emphasize different aspects of the sentence. Classical Arabic is therefore older and more original than the other languages, it is the language of Adam.
Now how is it that the Qur'an came thousands of years later in an alphabet that had never been recorded before, and in the highest form the language had ever taken?
The creator is neither bound by time nor space, therefore the names are uttered as they truly were, in a language that is lexically, syntactically, phonemically, and semantically older than the oldest recorded writing. In fact, that writing appears to have been a simplified version of it. Not only that, but it would be the equivalent of the greatest works of any particular language all appearing in one book, in a perfect script and in the highest form the language could ever take. It is so high in fact, that it had yet to be surpassed despite the fact that over the last millennium the collection of Arabic manuscripts when compared on word-per-word basis in Western Museums alone, when they are compared with the collected Greek and Latin manuscripts combined, the latter does not constitute 1 percent of the former as per German professor Frank Griffel, in addition all in a script that had never been recorded before. Thus, the enlightenment of mankind from barbarism and savagery began, and the age of reason and rationality was born from its study.
To show the relation between Arabic and other "semitic" language, another Aramaic word for God is Alaha . Sounds familiar? Written without the confusing vowels, it is A-L-H ܐ ܠܗܐ (alap-lamed-he) as found in Targum or in Tanakh (Daniel, Ezra), Syriac Aramaic (Peshitta), reducted from the Arabic original (of which Aramaic is a dialect continuum) 'A-L-L-H' (Aleph-Lam-Lam-Ha). Add another A before the H for vocalization.
To illustrate,
Let's start with a simple sentence:
## The house is big
Arabic:
البيتُ كبيرٌ
al-bayt-u kabīr-un
Proto-Semitic:
*ʔal-bayt-u kabīr-u
Hebrew:
הבית גדול
ha-bayit gadol
Akkadian:
bītum rabûm
Amharic:
ቤቱ ገደሉ
betu gedelu
As can be seen, Arabic and Proto-Semitic have the same word order (noun-adjective), the same definite article (al-), and the same case endings (-u for nominative). Hebrew and Akkadian have lost the case endings and changed the definite article (ha- and -um respectively). Amharic has changed the word order (adjective-noun) and the definite article (u-).
But Arabic is not only similar to Proto-Semitic, it is also pre-Semitic, meaning that it is the original form of Semitic before it split into different branches. This is because Arabic preserves many features that are not found in any other Semitic language, but are found in other Afro-Asiatic languages, such as Egyptian and Berber. These features include:
- The definite article al-, which is derived from the demonstrative pronoun *ʔal- 'that'. This article is unique to Arabic among Semitic languages, but it is similar to the article n- in Berber and the article p-, t-, n- in Egyptian.
- The dual number for nouns and verbs, which is marked by the suffix -ān or -ayn. This number is rare in other Semitic languages, but it is common in other Afro-Asiatic languages, such as Egyptian and Berber.
- The imperfective prefix t- for verbs, which indicates the second person singular feminine or third person plural feminine. This prefix is unique to Arabic among Semitic languages, but it is similar to the prefix t- in Berber and Egyptian.
- The passive voice for verbs, which is marked by the infix t between the first and second root consonants. This voice is unique to Arabic among Semitic languages, but it is similar to the passive voice in Egyptian and Berber.
Finally, a more complex sentence: The letter was written with a pen.
Arabic:
كُتِبَتِ الرِّسَالَةُ بِالقَلَمِ
kutiba-t al-risāla-t-u bi-l-qalam-i
Proto-Semitic:
*kutiba-t ʔal-risāla-t-u bi-l-qalam-i
Hebrew:
המכתב נכתב בעט
ha-michtav niktav ba-et
Akkadian:
šipram šapāru bēlum
Egyptian:
sḏm.n.f p-ẖry m rnp.t
Berber:
tturra-t tibratin s uccen
Here, Arabic and Proto-Semitic have the same word order (verb-subject-object), the same passive voice marker (-t-), the same definite article (al-), and the same preposition (bi-). Hebrew has changed the word order (subject-verb-object), lost the passive voice marker, changed the definite article (ha-) and the preposition (ba-). Akkadian has changed the word order (object-subject-verb), lost the passive voice marker, changed the definite article (-um) and the preposition (bēlum).
Language; When you look at the actual linguistics, you'll find that many were puzzled by the opposite, that is, how the other "semetic" (why in quotes will be revealed later) languages were more "evolved" than Arabic, while Arabic had archaic features, not only archaic compared to bibilical Hebrew, Ethiopic, "Aramaic" contemporary "semetic" languages, but even archaic compared to languages from ancient antiquity; Ugaritic, Akkadain. What is meant here by Archaic is not what most readers think, it is Archaic not in the sense that it is simple, but rather that it is complex (think Latin to pig Latin or Italian or Old English, which had genders and case endings to modern English), not only grammatically, but also phonetically; All the so called semitic languages are supposed to have evolved from protosemetic, the Alphabet for protosemitic is that of the so called Ancient South Arabian (which interestingly corresponds with the traditional Arabic origins account) and has 28 Phonemes. Arabic has 28 phonemes. Hebrew has 22, same as Aramaic, and other "semitic" languages. Now pause for a second and think about it, how come Arabic, a language that is supposed to have come so late has the same number of letters as a language that supposedly predates it by over a millennium (Musnad script ~1300 BCE). Not only is the glossary of phonemes more diverse than any other semitic language, but the grammar is more complex, containing more cases and retains what's linguists noted for its antiquity, broken plurals. Indeed, a linguist has once noted that if one were to take everything we know about languages and how they develop, Arabic is older than Akkadian (~2500 BCE).
Now how is it that the Qur'an came thousands of years in a language that is lexically, syntactically, phonemically, and semantically older than the oldest recorded writing?
God did bring down the Qur’an, Mohamed is his Messenger.
Have they not travelled throughout the land so their hearts may reason, and their ears may listen? Indeed, it is not the eyes that are blind, but it is the hearts in the chests that grow blind. (Surah Al-Hajj, Verse 46).
May Allah Guide you misguided people, Ameen!🤲
Im dunking on allah
What was the nasheed you used near the beginning of the video
Orthodoxy is the one true Religion ☦️❤️
I'm a catholic but I seriously looking into orthodoxy. I'm fascinated by everything from it. God bless you ❤✝️☦
Cringe
@@strengthmonk Rest easy, no need to be offended by someone else' freedom of speech.
@@Faris-Alzalam19 not offended at all, just using my freedom of speech to call it fucking cringe
@@strengthmonk Cursing is bad for the soul.
To all ex-muslim,how many raakat in Suratul Fatihah?
What do you mean by this question? Sourat fatiha is part of the rakaa not the opposite.
@@hdxls-jx7lt No, We pray the voluntary prayer called "moos iyo bariis". didnt u use to pray that ?
@@African.mappingit's no use man everytime I talk with a Christian they don't even come up with REAL arguments and all they say Mohammed pbuh married Aesha when she was 6 years old ;-;
@@nikel_gamer9604 true, I have realized that they never say anything about the Quran. Only the hadiths.
@@African.mapping and this particular Hadith isn't really trusted by many scholars too
christianity is worshipping a god that repented for our own sins. This video made me go pray Isa, thank you
I'm an atheist, but having read through the entire bible the dude who said that the word "chiristian" isnt found in the bible in simply wrong. It appear in two different new testament books; Acts and 1 Peter.
Christian is someone who follows christ kindly get this basic knowledge
@@user-nk8lp4ng8r You're not even talking about the same thing that I am. I said that the word Christian appears in the Bible, which it does. I never once tried to define the word Christian, so whatever you are angry about is completely unrelated to what I said.
Why is this video even a thing? I'm a muslim myself so i might be biased, but calling any religion false is just so stupid.
@@noobymooby-ty8gh As a Muslim don't you believe that all religions other than Islam are false?
@@noobymooby-ty8ghfreedom of speech.
Ex Muslim from Greece over here 👋🏽, was born and raised orthodox Christian but for the most part my family and I where atheist and wheee really just Christian’s in name, around 6 year ago I converted to Islam since moving to Sweden due to influence from friends and I have studied the Quran as well as the Hadith’s in hopes of becoming an Islamic scholar and hopefully guide more people to Islam and also debunk Christianity a-swell as Judaism, start of 2022 I have found my faith back in Christ and honestly I can say that when you learn Arabic and actually read the Quran it’s blatantly obvious the evil intentions of the book and I actually question my sanity from 5-6 years ago.
Anyway after way too much hours of studying and research i have came to the conclusion that the Quran is nothing more than a book that plagiarised the Bible aswell as the Torah and “Allah” is nothing more than an alter ego for Mohammed, Let's take a look at it from Mohammad's perspective. Mohammad's father died before he could get to know him. His mother sent him away as well and later died when Mohammad was 6. A child has a very strong desire to be known and loved by his parents. I consider Allah to be Mohammad's alter ego. Mohammad might have suffered a narcissistic injury as a child and this created a supercharged desire to be "worshipped", to be seen. It was disproportionate in its scope to what a child needs. This was his overreaction to an unmet need as a child.
Loads of children face the same circumstances as Mohammad so why don't they all turn in to prophets? There are a lot of people with the same traits as Mohammad but in the case of Mohammad his underlying narcissism might have been supercharged by an additional medical condition. Temporal lobe epilepsy could have triggered a 'god complex' in him, making him genuinely feel like he's talking to some god even though it might just have been a part of his psyche.
We know that Mohammad claimed to be a man, but he wasn't shy in being worshipped like a manGod:
Hadith:
Narrated Anas:The Prophet (ﷺ) said "None of you will have faith till he loves me more than his father, his children and all mankind."
Reference : Sahih al-Bukhari 15
sunnah.com/bukhari:15
--------------------------------
His unmet needs in as a child resulted in such an extreme reaction that now he wanted to be valued above ALL MANKIND. Mohammad became a bottomless pit in his desire for devotion from others.
This was even reflected in how he thought about his alter ego Allah:
Hadith:
Abu Huraira reported Allah's Messenger (ﷺ) having said:
By Him in Whose Hand is my life, if you were not to commit sin, Allah would sweep you out of existence and He would replace (you by) those people who would commit sin and seek forgiveness from Allah, and He would have pardoned them.
Reference : Sahih Muslim 2749
sunnah.com/muslim:2749
----------------
Allah's an attention craving malignant narcissist. He cares about attention even more than people not sinning. What happened to Allah being only focused on people doing good deeds as a test? It looks like he loves sinners who give him the satisfaction of groveling for forgiveness in front of him so that they are at his mercy. This doesn't make sense from the perspective of a god of a universe of 200 billion trillion stars. However, it makes perfect sense when we realize that Allah is just Mohammad's alter ego and it too craves attention and worship just like Mohammad.
Mohammad in hadith didn't take any clear action against folks who were worshipping him like a manGOD:
Hadith excerpt form: ( sunnah.com/bukhari/54/19 )By Allah, whenever Allah's Messenger (ﷺ) spat, the spittle would fall in the hand of one of them (i.e. the Prophet's companions) who would rub it on his face and skin; if he ordered them they would carry his orders immediately; if he performed ablution, they would struggle to take the remaining water; and when they spoke to him, they would lower their voices and would not look at his face constantly out of respect.
--------------
How are they not worshipping this man if they are rubbing his spit on their faces? What exactly did they do after saving his wudu water?? Drink it??
As Mohammad's alter ego, Allah saying this makes perfect sense:
Koran 51:56:
And I did not create the jinn and mankind except to worship Me.
The whole focus of the Koran is believing in Allah and Mohammad and NOT doing good deeds. If it had been doing good deeds then Allah would have allowed non muslims to enter heaven based on their good deeds. It seems like worshipping and joining Mohammad's cult seems to be the number one objective of the Koran. Mohammad cooked up a vicious concept of hell in which Allah takes perverse pleasure in the eternal torture of his own creation. Malignant narcissists have extreme reactions to feeling even slightly slighted by somebody.
Mohammad was a supercharged malignant narcissist who over reacted to somebody not joining his cult with ETERNAL torture of this magnitude:
Koran 4:56:
Surely those who reject Our signs, We will cast them into the Fire. Whenever their skin is burnt completely, We will replace it so they will ˹constantly˺ taste the punishment. Indeed, Allah is Almighty, All-Wise.
---------------------------------
Is that proportional punishment for not accepting Islam? When Mohammad refused to provide PROOF when asked for? This makes no sense from the perspective of a benevolent god of the universe. It makes perfect sense from a human perspective in which malignant narcissism was supercharged by a god complex.
Mohammad did NOT tolerate critics. He ordered the killing of a female poet over just her words. Mohammad's minion killed her while she was still holding her baby. Mohammad massacred a whole tribe of jews because they were not ready to accept a man that failed to answer their questions about scripture.
A normal person fails a test and is willing to accept that he lacks in knowledge. Mohammad's reaction was over the top. Imagine a math student failing a math test and then rage quitting by saying that all previous math books have been tampered with! This is basically what Mohammad's claim was about previous scripture. Instead, of accepting that he wasn't well versed in previous scripture, he chose to denounce it as corrupted.
The following verse makes it clear that Mohammad was just a fan-fiction Abrahamic scripture plagiarist:
The Jews say, "Ezra is the son of Allāh"; and the Christians say, "The Messiah is the son of Allāh." That is their statement from their mouths; they imitate the saying of those who disbelieved before [them]. May Allāh destroy them; how are they deluded?
There is no known Jewish sect in history that has ever claimed that Ezra was the son of god.
All the verses of convenience in which Allah is acting as his personal secretary, acting as his harem manager show that Mohammad saw nothing wrong with Allah being so obsessed with him because he considered himself to be the center of the universe. His followers claim that he is just a man but they too treat him like a manGod and the center of the universe. This video makes it clear: ua-cam.com/video/dk6jnUSaztY/v-deo.html
In my opinion, looking at the Koran and hadith from the angle of Mohammad being a malignant narcissistic cult leader starts to make a lot of sense instead of looking at it from the perspective of an actual god saying all that has been said in the Koran and hadith.
Great to hear you found to Christ! Glory to Christ ❤️☦️☝️
You need to make a video on this if you haven’t already.
Glad you came back to the truth brother in christ ☦☦☦
In these days, there are many Muslim kids grown in England and America which are also born there and we see many that become roadman and gangsters, and some who become leaders are like prophets and generals wanting to kill and kill, ice cube converted to Islam and I think because he feels like worshipping his alter ego, he was deceived as well as other rappers which many young Muslim rappers from America speak violent lyrics and about gang stuff and sexual deeds, rappers that get saved which there aren't many, either leave rapping or use rapping to worship God, DMX's music changed drastically after He gave his life to God, as he didn't use profanity as much and made a song talking about his guilt when falling to sin and worshipping God. God bless those who are deceived and may their hearts be turned to the Holy Spirit and feel it not to “just feels right“ amen
I really enjoyed this, factual and funny. Harem manager, Abrahamic fan fiction...lol well done!!!!
Very good content. Now it will only make sense when you go and try to debate those people who you regard as having absurd arguments.
I m every were in this chat .Any muslim who know islam will never convert to christain , i dont want to hurt any person feeling . can u give any avidence that trinity is in bible or how trinity make sence. I studied christainty but my understanding bible is corrupted and jesus never clam to be god and trinity is not in bible and trinity dont make sence etc etc. As my understand Islam is true and there is prove . go and reseach yourself which is the right path i m not saying covert to islam.
@@ISLAM-is-only-way-to-hereafter i am with you mostly, that's why i am saying to this person to try and go debate it to someone who is learned. Any one can make these videos with no one to answer them except in comments.
I'm personally agnostic and I see your points with errors, contradiction, and historical inaccuracy. Although aren't mostly all religions built off faith over evidence? Basically, putting trust in ancient testimonials and/or deeds made by followers or the god(s) themselves? I'm sure most of these ancient texts would have a degree of human error, or a sort of supernatural logic in which humans are unable to understand. Informative video, nonetheless. It's cool to see other religious viewpoints and arguments from differing perspectives from time to time.
I grew up as a Muslim, learned the Quran with 5 years old. Everyone was praising me and respecting it. I left Islam in 2014 and found Jesus in 2021; or lets say he found me after many years of darkness and emptiness. I had an encounter with the holy spirit and two dreams in which Jesus stood in front of me with his holy light. It was amazing. Let us grow and become stronger. Being strong means to be kind.
"All truly strong people are kind.” - Vagabond
I have learned so much about the true face of Islam through Christian Prince. This man helped me throughout the years to understand what Muhammad really is: The Messenger of Satan. The Messenger who allows killing, raping, stealing, conquering, slaughtering, cheating, lying. Every Muslim is deceived by Allah. Even Allah himself admit it in the Quran 3:54. 600 years after Jesus the Devil claims that it was not Jesus who was killed. Salvation is not in Islam. You learn to fear God but raping is allowed, having sex slaves is allowed. From their fruits you shall know them. And Islam fruits are evil. Watch the world. Everywhere desctruction and hatred coming out of Islam. We don't accept nor respect this. We want peace and the TRUTH which is in Jesus.
Thank you my friend for this video and your effort. May the Lord help the Muslims because I grew up with Muslims and I can say that they are truly kind people but in the wrong path which is from the Devil. They need to be saved and set free from the chains of Islam.
Any dehumanization of a human being runs counter to the precept that God created each and every human being, and what God has created is to be respected. In Christianity it is simply stated that those who do not believe in Jesus Christ as their Lord and Savior, and live in accordance to this belief, are kept apart from God by the sinful nature of humanity. No one is considered evil just because s/he rejects Jesus Christ; one can be morally upright and still be out of communion with God. Rather, the one refusing to be purified by the blood of Jesus refuses to enter into communion with God.
where does the quran allow raping and having sex slaves u liar ?
Amen brother, God bless you. Welcome to our family. It seems there are more Muslims having Jesus come to them in their dreams than anybody else. We have just seen this happen in Palestine and Iran. I reckon that is because there are none other more trapped then Muslims are, because many fear to leave the relieigon.
Did you know one of Israel's most respected and recent Rabbis declared at the end of his life that Jesus was the messiah !?
That just blows my mind.
All the signs are happening my friend, Christ is the only way that makes sense
Ive asked allah to show me a sign that islam is true, i wanted him to give me a dream of him. Instead you received 2 from the lord jesus christ. God bless you my friend and i hope you touch many lives and inspire many non believer's to come to christ our saviour.
ah yes, another ex-mozlems
I used to consider being Muslim but now I know the truth
Well it is sad that this video steered your heart away from the truth
@@AliTanoli-cq3jsappeals to emotion are what you use when you have no argument
@@tynytian Ok, you seem to appeal to logic, what do you have to offer
@@AliTanoli-cq3jssafety for Kids away from pedophilia
@@AliTanoli-cq3js you already said 'sad' and 'steered your heart' in one sentence, any further conversation with you is forfeit. Please do the mind ablutions, or there will be pollutions.
Average arguement for islam
1. Jesus ate food
2. Muslims eat food
therefore jesus is a muslim because they both eat food
also didn't jesus drink whine, and is considered perfect by the quran but that breaks allah's laws to not consume alcholol or things associated with it
İsa (as) dıdnt drink wine
god is not a man in the old testament
god somehow became a man in the new testament
@@rabielazazi787 how?
İts said in the quran İsa is müslim what food has to do with this?
I guess you did not actually do any research into Islam. WHen Islam was revelaed, alcohol was gradually banned. It was not banned outright.
proud to be Christian 🙏🏻🙏🏻☦☦
Christianity is just as false as islam
One of the errors in the Quran is that it doesn’t even know the Holy Trinity, it mentions that the Trinity is Mary, Jesus and the Father.
in the very same verse, this ignoramus 15l4mic 90d even strawmanning Jews worshipping Ezra as the son of God the same way as Christian's Jesus 😅
It doesn't say that. It mentions people taking Jesus and Mary as Gods because that's what the Arabs did. They had many pictures and statues of different dieties in the Kaaba which the Arabs used to pray to and one of them was a frescoe of Jesus and Mary.
@@ShapurDD there are other verses in the Quran which states that it mentions Jesus with the Father.
@@mikeylejan8849 References to that pop up in 2 cases depending on who that verse is directed to.
1) For the Pagans, Allah was also one of the gods in the Kaaba, alongside Jesus and Mary. This is the more common one.
2) For the Christians who believe that Jesus belongs with Allah and the Holy Spirit in a Trinity.
Maybe early Christians in Arabia believed that. With high variations in faith of early Christians (Arians, Valentinians, Gnostics) everything could be possible.
What a lovely video,This will cause ZERO controversy
Oh well it’s been a huge controversy for a few millenniums already. That’s why the Middle East has a holy war every decade or so and always has 🤷♂️. OP isn’t causing controversy
You are a liar, you are just throwing words here and there, you are not approaching the Quran with analytical mind, you are not garbing the text itself and scrutinize it, and you are using the bible which itself is not a source of authority because it is corrupted and people change it
and ww2 was between muslims? or ukrain? are you stupid??@@tritontransport
The Aramaic word for God is "Alaha". It's the word Isa PBUH used. Sounds familiar?
Written without the confusing vowels it is written A-L-H ܐ ܠܗܐ (alap-lamed-he) as found in Targum or in Tanakh (Daniel, Ezra), Syriac Aramaic (Peshitta), reduced from the Arabic original (of which Aramaic is a dialect continuum as will be explained) it is written in the Arabic script 'A-L-L-H' (Aleph-Lam-Lam-Ha) add an A before the last H for vocalization.
The word God in another rendition in Hebrew ʾĕlōah is derived from a base ʾilāh, an Arabic word, written without confusing vowel it is A-L-H in the Arabic script, pronounced ilah not eloah. Hebrew dropped the glottal stop and mumbled it, aramic mumbled a little less and it became elaha. Infact both are written written A-L-H in Arabic, it is pronounced i in Arabic and not A because it is an Alef with hamza below (إ أ ) They are two different forms of Alef. And it mean "a god", it is the non definitive form of A-L-L-H, in which the Alef is without a glottal stop/hamza,(ا), but this kind of nuance is lost in the dialect continua.
infact "YHWH" itself is an Arabic word as discussed by Professor. Israel Knohl (Professor of Biblical studies at the Hebrew University of Jerusalem) in the paper" YHWH: The Original Arabic Meaning of the Name."
jesus as his name is often misspelled due to the lack of the ayin sound in Greek, which was rendered to Iesous, coupling the nearest sound to ayin, same letter found in 'Iraq', which sounds entirely different in Arabic form 'Iran' in Arabic, with the -ous Greek suffix that Greeks typically add to their names 'HerodotOS', 'PlotinUS', 'AchelOUS' and later mumbled into a J. The yeshua rendition of Isa (his name in the Qur'an) PBUH which is purported to be the name of Jesus is KNOWN to had been taken from greek. Western Syriac also use "Isho". Western Aramaic (separate from Syriac which is a dialect of Eastern Aramaic) use "Yeshu". Western Syriac has been separate from Western Aramaic for about 1000 years. And sounds don't even match up. Syriac is a Christian liturgical language yet the four letters of the name of Jesus «ܝܫܘܥ» [ = Judeo-Babylonian Aramaic: «ישוע» ] sounds totally different in West vs East Syriac, viz. vocalized akin to Christian Arabic, Hebrew, Aramaic «ܝܶܫܽܘܥ» (Yēšūʿ) in West Syriac, but pronounced more akin to Muslim Arabic Quran character name Isa in East Syriac «ܝܑܼܫܘܿܥ» (ʾĪšōʿ). The reason for this confusion is their dropping of phonemes. Only someone that has no idea what the letters are or how they sound would have a name ending in a pharyngeal fricative like the ayin, if it were to be used in a name it would have had to be in the beginning, thus the Arabic rendition is the correct one. An example in English is how the appended -d is a common error amongst the English pronouncing Gaelic names. The name Donald arose from a common English mispronunciation of the Gaelic name Donal. Just how it is with donal becoming donald and the two becoming distinct and the original being regarded as something seperate so too did Isa PBUH turn to Iesous turn to jesus and when they tried going back to the original they confused it for yeshua ( ysu is how it is actually written) for Isa PBUH ( 3'eysah )
Schlözer in his preparation for the Arabia expedition in 1781 coined the term Semitic language:
"From the Mediterranean to the Euphrates, from Mesopotamia to Arabia ruled one language, as is well known. Thus Syrians, Babylonians, Hebrews, and Arabs were one people (ein Volk). Phoenicians (Hamites) also spoke this language, which I would like to call the Semitic (die Semitische)." -Before Boas: The Genesis of Ethnography and Ethnology in the German By Han F. Vermeulen.
He was only half right though, Arabic is the only corollary to "proto-semitic", infact the whole semitic classification is nonsensical as will be shown.
"protosemetic" Alphabet (28), Arabic Alphabet (28), Latin transliteration, hebrew (22)
𐩠 𐩡 𐩢 𐩣 𐩤 𐩥 𐩦 𐩧 𐩨 𐩩 𐩪 𐩫 𐩬 𐩭 𐩮 𐩰 𐩱 𐩲 𐩳 𐩴 𐩵 𐩶 𐩷 𐩸 𐩹 𐩺 𐩻 𐩼
ا ب ت ث ج ح خ د ذ ر ز س ش ص ض ط ظ ع غ ف ق ك ل م ن ه و ي
A b t ṯ j h kh d ḏ r z s sh ṣ ḍ ṭ ẓ ʿ ġ f q k l m n h w y
א ב ג ד ה ו ז ח ט י כ ל מ נ ס ע פ צ ק ר ש ת
Merged phonemes in hebrew and aramaic:
ح, خ (h, kh) merged into only kh consonant remain
س, ش (s, sh) merged into only Shin consonant remaining
ط, ظ (ṭ/teth, ẓ) merged into only ṭ/teth consonant remaining
ص, ض (ṣ, ḍ/Tsad ) merged into only ḍ/Tsad consonant remaining
ع, غ (3'ayn, Ghayn) merged into a reducted ayin consonant remaining
ت, ث (t/taw, th) merged into only t/taw consonant remaining
The reason why the protoS alphabet here is 28 and not 29, is because the supposed extra letter is simply a س written in a different position, but it was shoehorned to obfuscated. In Arabic letter shapes are different depending on whether they are in the beginning , middle or end of a word.
No such thing as the bible, the new testament is a concoction of several books that were deemed canonical, books written in Greek that were given the hellenized names of Apotsles who neither wrote, nor spoke greek to give it an illusion of antiquity, much like the calendar we have today, which was established in the year 535 CE by Dionysus Exegesis so too was the original message altered to that of the pauline credo, a digestible religion to the yet to be converted greeks who had no desire to follow the mosaic laws. None of the disciples spoke of trinity, ate pork or proclaimed it is allowable to do so, yet the miracle begotten paul, whom peter called him enemy, introduced his new creed according to his whims, often boastful of his innovations he said " I was not a whit behind the very chiefest apostles." There is no passage in Paul inconsistent with these quotations; no passage suggesting that the admission of the gentiles into the Christian church was an idea of Jesus, or that it was accepted by the twelve apostles in Jerusalem before the conversion of Paul, or that he received any instruction from them or acknowledged any duty of obedience or submission to them. This gospel which Paul preached and which, according to his boast, was original with him, included many tenets not found in the four gospels or not set forth there in unmistakable terms. By implication, it repudiated the ascetic and communistic maxims of the synoptic gospels, It proclaimed the abrogation of the Mosaic ceremonial law. It proclaimed that the unsearchable riches of Christ were to be distributed as freely among the Gentiles as among the Jews. It announced itself as a new and independent religion; and popular speech recognized the correctness of the claim by calling its adherents Christians, and their doctrine Christianity.
Language; When one looks at the actual linguistics, one will find that many were puzzled by the opposite, that is, how the other "semetic" languages were more "evolved" than Arabic, while Arabic had archaic features, not only archaic compared to bibilical Hebrew, Ethiopic, "Aramaic" contemporary "semetic" languages, but even archaic compared to languages from ancient antiquity; Ugaritic, Akkadain. What is meant here by Archaic is not what most readers think, it is Archaic not in the sense that it is simple, but rather that it is complex (think Latin to pig Latin or Italian or Old English, which had genders and case endings to modern English), not only grammatically, but also phonetically; All the so called semitic languages are supposed to have evolved from protosemetic, the Alphabet for protosemitic is that of the so called Ancient South Arabian (which interestingly corresponds with the traditional Arabic origins account) and has 28 Phonemes. Arabic has 28 phonemes. Hebrew has 22, same as Aramaic, and other "semitic" languages. Now pause for a second and think about it, how come Arabic, a language that is supposed to have come so late has the same number of letters as a language that supposedly predates it by over a millennium (Musnad script ~1300 BCE). Not only is the glossary of phonemes more diverse than any other semitic language, but the grammar is more complex, containing more cases and retains what's linguists noted for its antiquity, broken plurals. Indeed, a linguist has once noted that if one were to take everything we know about languages and how they develop, Arabic is older than Akkadian (~2500 BCE).
Now how is it that the Qur'an came thousands of years later in an alphabet that had never been recorded before, and in the highest form the language had ever taken?
The creator is neither bound by time nor space, therefore the names are uttered as they truly were, in a language that is lexically, syntactically, phonemically, and semantically older than the oldest recorded writing. In fact, that writing appears to have been a simplified version of it. Not only that, but it would be the equivalent of the greatest works of any particular language all appearing in one book, in a perfect script and in the highest form the language could ever take. It is so high in fact, that it had yet to be surpassed despite the fact that over the last millennium the collection of Arabic manuscripts when compared on word-per-word basis in Western Museums alone, when they are compared with the collected Greek and Latin manuscripts combined, the latter does not constitute 1 percent of the former as per German professor Frank Griffel, in addition all in a script that had never been recorded before. Thus, the enlightenment of mankind from barbarism and savagery began, and the age of reason and rationality was born from its study.
God did bring down the Qur’an, Mohamed is his Messenger.
@@mznxbcv12345 No one is reading all of that devil script, #SamShamoun might interest you though.
3:14 The Quran does not say let Christians judge by the gospels. In Islam, they believe Jesus was given a book called The Gospel (al-injeel) similar to how Muhammad was given the Quran. It's not the gospels according to Matthew, Mark, Luke, and John.
There was no record that tells there is a gospel is a book that was given to Jesus. If Quran made it up then that's a different story. And Who gave you guys Quran? Angel Gabriel, not even allah himself, what if devil disguised into that angel and manipulated you all. And even if there is allah, Why would he make a huge mistake?, which is to send another last prophet or to simply change the whole story. Is your allah dumb, he didn't send any prophet for 600 years and sends mohammad after Jesus. Is your allah not able to plan for future and makes a messenger to a man who have committed a lot of sins. After 600 years, all of a sudden there is a rotten messenger and not even your so called allah gave him book but angel gabriel, look like you guys are hugely gambling on your faith on that fake angel
we're being told to judge by a long gone book then?
Imagine saying Jesus was given Quran when Quran was founded 600years are Jesus' death.
@@Doflaminguard they say it was a gospel, which means god news of the life and death of the messiah,
How come this famous ingill hasn't ever been found nor heard of. And if it was supposedly corrupted, did Allah's plan fail? He could have just made it incorruptible so then none would be confused.
Allah is the kind of guy who creates the problem and then sells the solution
Who is the guy in the right from the language section?
I almost converted to Islam once upon a time.
I was disenchanted with Protestant Christianity (being raised as a not particularly devout AME (African Methodist Episcopal)) and the hollowness and logical inconsistencies of atheism, especially the edge lord anti-thiestic atheism of the early-mid 2000s during my teenage years.
I was fortunate enough to go to a good high-school with a diverse student body, and one of my best friends in high school was a Sunni Muslim with family from Egypt. We used to get in all sorts of discussions about all kinds of topics, and he and his family impressed me with his intelligence, manners and hospitality. There were these two Muslim twins I used to hang out with back then too and they were REALLY smart, easily a few grade levels above the average class at the time. Their families were from Pakistan, I think.
Later when I went to university, my politics were moving towards a more anarcho-syndicalism libertarian leftism, and I met up with students who were anti-Zionist, and many of them were Muslim, so I became pals with some of them. I bought a Quran and Hadith and started reading, as I was all over the place at the time. I was doing yoga and kundalini exercises regularly and reading Hindu and Buddhist sutras, existentialist philosophy, Zen Buddhist treatises, etc. I didn't commit to Islam at the time, because I was still deeply skeptical of explicit religious claims.
Long story short (were talking 10-15 years now), after going to two Buddhist silent meditation retreats and watching our world crumble before my eyes, slowly but surely I'm coming to realize the sheer importance and magnificence of Christ and the the church that immediately followed his earthly sojourn. I have friends and acquaintances today who are Muslim, Zen Buddhist, Hindu, Jewish, etc., but these systems and philosophies don't seem to compare to Christ and what he left for the world.
(Oh and the fact that my father (RIP/Memory Eternal) was a member of the NATION OF ISLAM back in the day, but that's a whole other story.)
Me too, I thought that Islam is nice and almost wanted to convert because of the lies of Muslim people on tiktok saying that Islam destroyed racism without mentioning the slave trade that was continued in Islamic nations even after 1800
same bruv
Buddha soothes me and Jesus comforts me. I find both infinitely glorious and complementary, Buddha is man who becomes God and Jesus is God who becomes man.
They both follow parallel paths, with Buddha one attains love through wisdom, with Jesus one attains wisdom through love. They are the 2 lights of the world, the 2 paths that lead to the foot of the sun.
@@Maitatron I'm sorry but you can't serve two masters, either you will hate one and loved the other. Any religion that you can lie to yourself into thinking that you can be pious enough that God will owe you something can not be the true path to God. Jesus is the King that goes infront of His troops as all others makes you fight on the frontline.
Nation of Islam is Mormonism for Black People.
Me as a Christian: another day another win for the OGs
Opposite
If being a Christian means being delusional then hey you do you I guess
OGs are jews
@@vivieie proof?
@@gregkareem9824Judaism was the first abrahamic religion, its a historical fact, not opinion, that Judaism became a religion long before christianity, and like the video stated, islam stole from Judaism. but we, jews AND christians, can both be OGs 😛
I am a Muslim, thank God. I don't have anything against different views, opinions, or religious beliefs. After all, when provided with evidence, isn't it only okay to believe whatever you want? Who am I to tell what you should believe in?
I think it's okay, when you are truly believing it, that you can call others to "the truth" (whatever that should be for you). But to belittle a religion, "calling it out", making fun of it, then, saying it is only merely critique: Isn't that quite disrespectful? Isn't one of the most important views in Christianity to only treat others the way you want to be treated?
I am in love with a Christian women and we want to marry. I swear to God, she has such a pure heart. Tomorrow I will tell from this Video, this "critique" and I already know that she will be disappointed from all of you and that I didn't see other Christians "debunking" this video. I also have a friend who is a strict Christian believer, quotes of the bible writen all over his house and bibles all around, opened up. I think he would also be disappointed in this comment section.
However, I am no one to judge anyone. After all, I also commit sins. May God forgive our sins, it doesn't matter if Muslim or Christian. Amin.
Let's live in peace together and let's respect each other. We are no enemies and we should treat each other nicely. My friends are Christians, my love interest is also. We all respect each others beliefs. Let's talk openly about faith but please don't tell others what they should believe in and in which they shouldn't or wouldn't that make us any different from extremists living in Iraq or Iran?
Taqiyya fried chicken. 'Let's live in peace together ...' blah blah. So manipulative.
amadán
Thank god..?
@@idkexitAllah is just God in Arabic. it's SCARY how many people don't know that. like the likes of you.
Critic is only disrespectfull if you cant handle critic. Critic is a way to guide people to be better. So please criticise my respond, amen 🙏 ❤
Oof man thx for making me pray and pick up the quran. Allhamdulillah 🎉
You’ve been brainwashed. I pray God opens your eyes to the truth
Brother's and sister's I know you love to hear that the Quran is false but we must pray for the people in Islam.
Please pray for them that they open their eyes before it's too late for them.
"rude af"
❤
Nope I want to believe in the truth
There is no use in praying for a people who take life itself, the Spirit of God and the great teachings of the Messiah! Jesus for a joke.
Whoever rejects Jesus as the crucial mediator and connector to our heavenly father, is and remains disconnected to the holy Spirit of God whether you pray or not. 🍷🌁
If allah does strictly NOT allow sin for his believers while here on Earth and is one of the reasons why he would never sully/defile his divine being by coming to mankind/earth and interact with them directly (even though he made them in the first place)... then why does he not only allow man into heaven/jannah, but allows sin and even promises it as incentives to believers while here on Earth??? Muslims tell me that God would never sully himself by coming down to mankind/earth and interact with them and because they are dirty sinners... but then, he not only allows, but incentivizes their beliefs by promising UNLIMITED SIN and worldy pleasures in Heaven/jannah itself!!!
Islam says that you can't have premarital sex, or drink alcohol, or sin in general while here on Earth... but then... once we get to god's heavenly abode, not only is SIN now okay (thus sullying his great name and his divine, pure house), but you get even more!!! Instead of no lusting/premarital sex... in heaven, you can not only have sex, but you are promised dozens upon dozens of virgin women, who are re-virginized by allah after you fck them, for you to defile all over again. Instead of no alcohol and drinking... in heaven, not only can you drink alcohol, but allah will provide you "Rivers of Wine" to drink from. Instead of God removing all wants and worldly desires from his believers once they get to heaven (thus maintaining the purity and sanctity of God/heaven) so they can be united with him for ever and ever amen... in Islam, allah welcomes sins of the flesh and lust and just absolute depravity into Heaven itself and defiling not just his creation, but now his heavenly abode too!!! Its disgusting! If sin is not allowed while here on Earth... then why is it not only allowed in Heaven/jannah, but its MULTIPLIED and promised as an incentive!
Its disgusting and makes no sense. And it dilutes the sanctity and holiness of the Great Creator, Himself! @@randomfellow1483
The sooner the true nature of Islam is revealed, the better.
Islam has been around for ages & still going strong! There are hundreds of religions & each of us has a choice. So you are free to take your pick. Hope you make the right one!
@@dinonazamodeen5694Not all religions come from God. That includes a religion that encourages rape.
@@dinonazamodeen5694 You don't get any salvation when it comes to Islam tho 🤦
Had the thumbnail as Islam debunked and Islam is false but pretty much whatever he said in the intro is from the biblical perspective (unreliable source).
Holy Quran got history wrong? Then tell me why does the bible use the word pharaoh at the times of prophet Joseph and Moses (which is incorrect as both times had different titles and not simply pharaoh) and why does the Holy Quran use king for one and pharaoh for the other (which is correct)?. Again if its simply about copying then why does the Holy Quran mention the pharaoh body being prserved (which the body has been) and the bible didnt mention that?
You brought up John 10:30, then check john 17:3 (now is Jesus sending himself??) which also shows that they are separate, also check Timothy 2:5 which shows both of them as separate. Also see john 5:30 in which it is said that he cant do anything on his own.
Holy Quran 5:47 isnt a nightmare for muslims. It is referring to what Allah revealed, not what you guys go around with gospels of luke, matthew etc. The original message of Hazrat Isa (Jesus) got distorted so they (christians) now come to Islam.
Funny thing is you brought up Galatians 1:8 which uses the singular for gospel. And look at how many you have currently. And can you tell me where does the Holy Quran praises the bible??
Why Allah revealed the Holy Quran 600 years later? Christianity got distorted with the passage of time like paul preaching a distorted message to gentiles (check new jerome biblical commentry on matthew 5:17 and how paulism came forward), how the trinity became official 300 years after Jesus at the council of nicaea and constantinople. The actual reason or why the Holy Quran was revealed at that time, Only Allah Knows Best.
Holy Prophet (PBUH) marriage to Hazrat Aisha was completed when she was 9 years old and even his worst enemies didnt say anything about the marriage because it was normal at that time. Why dont you check your own societies 100-200 years back. In 1800s the age of consent for girls in UK was 10-12 years and in US in 1881 the age consent was 10-12 except the Delaware state which had it at 7.
"Lusted"? Really pathetic and not surprised coming from guys who tries to distort information. The Holy Prophet (PBUH) first marriage, when he was young and 25 years old, was with a noble woman who was quite older than him.
"This is why muslims are leaving Islam"? Keep your made up stuff to yourself. Check pew research on religious switching and Islam had an increase (more people converted) while christianity saw a decrease (more people left) comparatively.
This is this guy in just the intro and then there are people who try to learn about Islam or even christianity from him. You have the concept of being born as sinners right? While check ezekiel 18:20 which says the opposite of it.
And Allah Knows Best.
@@zoraizkhan6230 Allah is the great deceiver in your holy book and the deceiver in the Bible is the devil so put 2 and 2 together.
[Deletes Comments]
and thats how no Muslim supplied any arguments
Proof?
@@panapolyEpirus The mindless fool cultist sheeps keep posting links to their favorite Dawa channels which is triggering the YT moderation bot to delete their comments and they blaming Kyle for deleting them. This is Islam for you.
your comment is not deleted tho
"Offer a good refutation" is what he said 😀 do you know what that means? It means, their arguments aren't good. So basically lies or unlogical stuff.
@@OnlyJesus-Saves
For argument #1: To understand why Allah calls these prophets Muslims, you have to understand what the meaning of the word is.
The word Muslim comes from the root verb Aslam, or to surrender oneself to. The word Muslim, in Arabic, is a Ism Fael, or noun of a doer. This means that a Muslim is that who surrenders himself to Allah. Also, Ibraheem is referred to as Haneef, which in the Quran usually means someone who believes in one true god. This is evident as he disbelieved in the false gods of Nazareth and tried to find a real god.
For argument #2: How are you attempting to disprove Islam, using your own book. As for the worship, yes we know they worshipped in a different way. You're also literally proving how much more fair Islam is compared to Christianity. You're saying we don't have a hierarchy. And that is very true, we do have however Ulama or Sheiks that know more than people like me and you that we seek their help if we need it. As for the theology, you can't say something doesn't make sense, because I can come up with a lot of "It doesn't make sense" arguments for you guys. Also there's no way you just said that alcohol is haram before understanding the context. Alcohol was HALAL for a certain time period, until it was later forbidden. I'm going to come up with an argument using the same exact method you used. In the Quran it says that Jesus (PBUH) told his people that I'm giving you glad tidings of a prophet who comes after me who's name is Ahmad, in the ayah after it says, then when he comes with the signs, they disbelieve. (This is out of my memory so if I'm off by a couple words please forgive me, the same meaning is evident). This was a prophecy that was prophesized by Jesus. Once again you can't disprove the Quran with the Bible.
For argument #3: How does an illiterate person, living in ARABIA, steal things from other religions.
For argument #4: Yes we do praise Christians, (real ones who actually follow the rules, and not commit adultery, eat pig, etc)
This is all at minute 3:22 btw, I'm going to stop because I have a lot of better things to do, I would love if you made an actual debate between me and you, rather than constantly attacking Islam and expecting a bunch of people on youtube comments to disprove you. And again, I really think we should have an online debate.
Thank you so much for this information. Why would I trust a book made 500 years after Jesus 💀
thats got the same energy as, "why would i trust a book thats 4000 years after moses"
@@mysticx5149 You make no sense simpleton. The new testament doesn't contradict anything Moses taught, it confirms his teachings, laws and is a continuation of that.
@@nyctom08 nope nope, he said he wont trust a book that came after the bible, what about the torah? It came before the bible, what i cant use it suddenly?
@@mysticx5149 Are you high or something? The Torah is literally part of the Bible...
@@nyctom08same as Islam it’s not contraditing any of Moises and Jesus taught but we just know that the Bible is true Jesus is true yes ! But do you understand it the right way? Do you really got the original Bible and what it said that’s what we are saying
The fact people believe in islam never made sense to me. The quran was only shown to one man with no eye witnesses to him getting it. While Jesus met many people and we have recorded stories from them
Actually revelations were given to him at multiple times, and companions did witness it
we also believe in Jesus y'know.
@@zorgun2864 not our version tho.
@@Frazier16 we believe in jesus as a messenger, not a God.
Who are these people?
Keep growing the beard kyle! Also can you do a video on atonement in orthodoxy and why the keys of death and decent into hades is so important
Can I debate u?
I have already read surat Al kafirun, thank God.
Islam would much rather talk trash about Christianity. Its like that guy who has nothing to offer so he just talks down about the other guy. Islam says muhamed follows all the other prophets yet they have to go outside the quran to find what the other prophets said
And then they'll cry wolf on you when you literally just ask them basic questions, or even just read their book/Quran directly. And call you "rude af" for bringing up anything that might make Islam look bad. Smh
Other way around people dedicate their entire UA-cam lives to bashing Islam lol Christian channels but teach nothing other than why they believe Islam is false meanwhile Ya'll got zionists spitting at u disrespecting Jesus pbuh & his mother smh & no videos on these channels about any of this .. Extremely bizarre behavior
@@user-xp5id1kh4r No one does that? Where? Who?
And Christians don't y'all doing it right now
There's more videos/channels like this heaps and bounds then there is the other way around as a matter of fact videos yea but I've never seen an entire Islamic channel fully dedicated to going at Christianity where every single video is about how false it is & it it dies exist I'd keep the same energy & say my brother is definitely unstable if that's all he has to offer rather than teach .. What's even more crazy is even tho we view Jesus (pbuh) different we respect him & his mother The Jews/Zionists do not & somehow a lot of Christians think they have this connection with them & Israel & all that .. Supporting that movement goes 100% against New Testament theology but anything to combat Islam can't make this stuff up 🤦♂️
Say that it’s a false religion in a Muslim country you will never be seen again
That only showes how evil it is
@Elioha-gt8pu bruh you so stupid
@@Elioha-gt8pu i agree with u ❤
@@Elioha-gt8pu "evil it is" really? picking the corrupt muslims in an arabic government and saying that it's the behavior entire population of muslims? what type of ignorancy is this??
@@Matrixorial I live in Georgia country and many of my ancestors were beheaded by Muslims for never converting from Orthodoxy to Islam!We Orthodox Christians never beheaded Muslims for not converting to Orthodox Christianity.
Acts 8:37
Main article: Acts 8 § Verse 37
KJV: "And Philip said, If thou believest with all thine heart, thou mayest. And he answered and said, I believe that Jesus Christ is the Son of God."
Modern versions: Either sidelined to a footnote (e.g., ESV, RV, RSV, NRSV, NIV, Hodges & Farstad Majority Text) or omitted altogether (e.g., Moffatt, Goodspeed, Schonfield, Robinson & Pierpont Majority Text).
Reason: The earliest Greek manuscript (Ea/E2) of the New Testament to include this verse dates from the late 6th or early 7th century[26][27] and it is only found in Western witnesses to the text with many minor variations.[28] The majority of Greek manuscripts copied after 600 AD and the majority of translations made after 600 AD do not include the verse.[29][30][31][32] The tradition of the confession was current in the time of Irenaeus[33] as it is cited by him (c. 180)[34] and Cyprian (c. 250)[35]
This verse appears in E (specifically, a portion from a codex consisting of Acts, dated to the 6th century, once owned by Archbishop William Laud and therefore called the Codex Laudianus, sometimes designated E2 or Ea) and several cursives dating after the 9th century (showing many variants), "manuscripts of good character, but quite inadequate to prove the authenticity of the verse," according to F.H.A. Scrivener.[36] This verse was not found in the Syriac Peshitta, with the result that a printed edition of the Peshitta inserted the verse translated into Syriac by the editors,[36] It is similarly missing from p45, 74, א, A,B,C,P,Ψ, and a multitude of other codices and cursives. Its omission has a UBS confidence rating of A.[37] However, as Kurt Aland noted, "The external evidence [for the inclusion of this verse] is so weak that the Nestle apparatus cited only the support for insertion and not for the original omission... The voice which speaks in Acts 8:37 is from a later age, with an interest in the detailed justification of the [Ethiopian] treasurerer's desire for baptism."[38] It was omitted in the Complutensian edition, and included in Erasmus's editions only because he found it as a late note in the margin of a secondary manuscript and, from Erasmus, it found its way into other Textus Receptus editions and then the KJV.[39] As Scrivener said, "We cannot safely question the spuriousness of this verse, which all the critical editors condemn."[36]
"For although in the Acts of the Apostles the eunuch is described as at once baptized by Philip, because "he believed with his whole heart," this is not a fair parallel. For he was a Jew, and as he came from the temple of the Lord he was reading the prophet Isaiah," (Cyprian)[35] and is found in the Old Latin (2nd/3rd century) and the Vulgate (380-400). In his notes Erasmus says that he took this reading from the margin of manuscript 4ap (15th century) and incorporated it into the Textus Receptus.[40] J. A. Alexander (1857) suggested that this verse, though genuine, was omitted by many scribes, "as unfriendly to the practice of delaying baptism, which had become common, if not prevalent, before the end of the 3rd century."[41]
Acts 15:34
KJV: "Notwithstanding it pleased Silas to abide there still."
Reason: Although this verse, or something similar to it, is quite old, it does not appear in the oldest manuscripts, and the manuscripts that do contain it are inconsistent about its text. It does not appear at all in א, A,B,E,L,P,Ψ, and other mss, some Italic, Syriac, Coptic, Slavonic, the best mss of the Latin Vulgate, and other versions, and quotations of this paragraph in Chrysostom.
The verse as it appears in the KJV is found in less ancient Greek manuscripts (cursives, after the 9th century) and some other Italic, Syriac, Coptic, Armenian, Ethiopic, and other versions. However some other, equally old resources, such as the C codex, and several cursives, change one word to make the verse read, "Notwithstanding it pleased Silas that they should abide there still."
Several other sources, such as Codex D (Codex Bezae) and some Italic manuscripts, extend the verse with the ending, "and Judas traveled alone"; and a couple of Italic and Latin manuscripts add to that, "to Jerusalem."[42] Erasmus annotated this verse with the comment that the reference to Judas did not appear in any Greek ms known to him.[43]
As F.H.A. Scrivener put it, "No doubt this verse is an unauthorised addition, self-condemned indeed by its numerous variations. [...] [It must have begun as] a marginal gloss, designed to explain how [...] Silas was at hand in verse 40, conveniently for Saint Paul to choose him as a companion in travel.[44]
This verse was omitted from the Revised Version and most modern versions, but many versions include it in a footnote.
Acts 24:6-8
KJV: "6Who also hath gone about to profane the temple: whom we took, and would have judged according to our law. 7But the chief captain Lysias came upon us, and with great violence took him away out of our hands, 8Commanding his accusers to come unto thee: by examining of whom thyself mayest take knowledge of all these things, whereof we accuse him." (Only verse 7 is omitted entirely, as well as the beginning of verse 6 and most of verse 8.)
Modern versions (RV): "6Who moreover assayed to profane the temple; on whom we also laid hold; 8from whom thou wilt be able, by examining him thyself, to take knowledge of all these things, whereof we accuse him."
Reason: These words are not found in the oldest sources - p74,א, A, B, P, several minuscules, some manuscripts of the Italic, Vulgate, Coptic, and Georgian versions. The words are found in sources not quite as old - E,Ψ, some minuscules (with many variants), some Italic manuscripts, and the Armenian and Ethiopic versions. The absence of these words from the earliest resources, and the several variations in the resources in which they appear, made their exclusion probable but not a certainty (the UBS assigned the omission a confidence rating of only D).[45] While verse 7 is omitted in its entirety, parts of verse 6 and verse 8 are also omitted.
Acts 28:29
KJV: "And when he had said these words, the Jews departed, and had great reasoning among themselves."
Modern versions (RV): (verse omitted from main text, in footnote with comment, "Some ancient authorities insert verse 29")
Reason: This verse is lacking in the oldest sources - p74, א, A,B,E,ψ, several minuscules, some Italic, Vulgate, Syriac, Ethiopic, and Coptic manuscripts, and the Armenian and Georgian versions. They appear only in later sources such as P (9th century) and several minuscules, and a smattering of Italic manuscripts. The UBS gave the omission of this verse a confidence rating of B. Erasmus of Rotterdam, in working up the very first printed Greek New Testament from a multitude of manuscripts, included this note for this verse: "I did not find the words in several old manuscripts."[46]
Romans 16:24
KJV: "The grace of our Lord Jesus Christ be with you all. Amen."
Modern versions (RV): (omitted from main text, in footnote)
Reason: This verse occurs twice in the KJV in this chapter; once as the conclusion to verse 20 and again as verse 24, which is the occurrence omitted from modern versions. The first occurrence (as part of verse 20) is very well supported by ancient resources, including p46, א, A,B,C,P,Ψ, and several ancient versions (although some omit 'Christ' and some omit 'Amen'); its inclusion in verse 20 got a UBS confidence rating of B. However, its recurrence as verse 24 is not so well supported. It does not occur after verse 23 in p46 & 61, א, A,B,C, several minuscules and some other sources; it does appear in D,G,Ψ, minuscule 629 (although G,Ψ, and 629-and both leading compilations of the so-called Majority Text-end the Epistle with this verse and do not follow it with verses 25-27) and several later minuscules; P and some minuscules do not have it as verse 24 but move it to the very end of the Epistle, after verse 27. Westcott and Hort said of the recurrence as verse 24, "This last combination, which rests on hardly any authority, and is due to late conflation, was adopted by Erasmus from the Latin and is preserved in the 'Received Text'."[47] The verses immediately before verse 24, the verse 24 itself, and the verses following verse 24 show many variations in the surviving manuscripts. An abbreviated history of the passage is that the conclusion of the Epistle to the Romans was known in several different versions: about the year 144, Marcion made radical changes in the ending of the Epistle to the Romans, breaking it off with chapter 14. At about the same time someone else made in other manuscripts the addition of verses 16:24 and 16:25-27. despite the existence of a concluding benediction at 16:20 (whose purpose was obscured by the greetings appended at 16:21-23). This resulted in a proliferation of readings (at least 15 different permutations among the surviving resources).[48] Because of its absence from the oldest sources and the confusion about its appearance in several of the sources containing it, its omission after verse 23 got a UBS confidence rating of B.[49]
thank you brother for exposing Islam, it is not an Abrahamic religion. pray for me brothers I am struggling
It is a Christian heretical denomination, just like Catholicism and Protestantism.
Christianity is not a monotheistic religion either, it's idol worshipping and paganistic.
@eliasziad7864
Orthodoxy is the original church that Christ founded & is the continuation of the old testament worship
@MushiSlayer-hz1ft
The God of the bible can enter creation- You have a different God & the wrong monotheism- that's why muslims can't justify directing their prayers & worship to a created stone.
ua-cam.com/users/shortsnYc3iZE-QbA?si=DLxYywKORgEr2wsS
@@eliasziad7864 Just the Catholics do that.
Always refreshing to see how more and more people are waking up in this day and time. Islamization has become a huge problem in countries like Germany too, but we're fortunate enough to have people like Michael Stürzenberger who don't shy away from publicly criticizing this ideology and all its inhumane aspects.
The purpose of Islam is to infest and take over, satan's way...
And Muslims specially target minority's , example in NZ they target Maori, especially the younger generation
Islam is the only solution to the corruption in the west.
Who is this Michael Sturzenberger
I presume that you are an evangelical christian and you believe in the doctrine of the trinity and vicarious atonement but not doing good works then you also believe as long as a man who rapes and murders your daughter and then repents and later on sin the same sin or a man rapes and murders your sister and then repents and later on sin the same sin or a man rape and murders your mother and then repents and later on sin the same sin or rapes and murders your wife and then repents and later on sin the same sin and evangelical christian still believes in the doctrine of the trinity and also believes that Jesus Christ died on the cross for his sins that he will be forgiven and will go to heaven and despite continuing to rape and murder innocent people but will still go to heaven as he still believe in the doctrine of the trinity and also as long as he still believes that Jesus died on the cross because you believe that this man is your evangelical christian brethren who you will embrace him but you also believe that good works are just like dirty rags according to your apostle Paul as your apostle Paul also said that faith alone believing that Jesus Christ died on the cross for your sins they you are forgiven and will go to heaven is your only salvation.
According to christian evangelical theology, good works are the consequence of salvation and not its justification. They are the sign of a sincere and grateful faith. They include actions for the Great Commission, that is, Christian evangelism, service in the Church and charity. So Good works is a consequence but not a necessity for christian evangelical salvation. That if you confess with your mouth, “Jesus is Lord,” and believe in your heart that God raised him from the dead, you will be saved. For it is with your heart that you believe and are justified, and it is with your mouth that you confess and are saved. ~Romans 10:9-10 You cannot be saved by your good works, because no matter how hard you try, your “good” is not good enough for the perfectly holy and completely righteous God who alone grants salvation. Nor can you be saved by your moral perfection-no matter how moral or how perfect you are. As the Old Testament prophet Isaiah points out, your righteousness is about as good as a “snot rag”. (Isaiah 64:6 ). I have actually cleaned that up a bit, because the Hebrew phrase for filthy rags, ukabeged ehdim, literally means, “like as rags of menstruation.”
Sorry if that disgusts you, but it’s Scripture-so blame Isaiah. The point is, both our acts of righteousness, and the quality of righteousness that we hope they produce, are disgusting to God. So if you are disgusted by Isaiah’s language, think of how God, who inspired Isaiah to choose those coarse words, is repulsed by our efforts to get him to save us. So what hope, then, is there for our salvation? Well, frankly, no hope resides within us. None whatsoever. Ephesians 2:1 says “As for you, you were dead in your transgressions and sins.” That’s how hopeless we are apart from God’s work to save us. You see, all a dead person can do is lay there and be dead, let alone try to be righteous before God.
Surah Al-Hajj (22 : 46)
"For indeed, it is not the eyes that are blinded, but blinded are the hearts which are within the breasts."
If you only knew how blinded they can get. But you don't.
@@chr_my you helped me increase my iman :)
@@sunburstcopperbottom3273 No worries.
Hey, to everyone genuinly interested in this topic, I strongly advise you to take your own research into your hand, since none of what this guy is claiming is right.
I'm by no means a scholar, nor am I ready to start researching every verse from ALL Abrahamic religions to disprove the false information stated in this video. I'm like any other person here, seeking for the truth and only the truth.
I learned about religion in school (I'm 19), mostly Christianity and Judaism. Islam was something I tried to catch up to in my private time.
I immediately noticed the wrong interpretation and approach in this video by acting as if the arguments stated are bulletproof and totally logic, while they ultimately boil down to "Islam just copied everyone, yet they're different and came 600 years after, so they are not trustable!"
I think its important to note that A. All of them are Abrahamic religions, meaning they're ment to be connected and B. If that 'they came later' argument was valid, it would ultimately be just as effective on christianity aswell, since Judaism was the first one to exist and furthermore create christianity (jesus was a jew that came to guide jews again, since there was a lot of injustice and bad going on among them and their society system with the groups they'd build)
Heres a very detailed source with proof regarding the claim that all prophets weren't muslim:
www.answering-christianity.com/luke6_40.htm
I would also like to add that When islam came last, it literally mentioned how christianity and judaism are from the same God (Allah) and that those before islam and the last revelations are granted paradise aswell.
Meaning, that those prophets and people who rightfully followed them did everything right back then.
Why would a false God claim such thing if it wasn't true or approved of from the same creator?
Also, islam does align with history, its just that people like this guy try to make up arguments that hold no weight really.
Thats why folks, ALWAYS do your own research with an open heart. By objective, rather than subjectiv to avoid the 'I only see what i wanna see" effect.
✌️
Asalamu Alaikum guys.
He firstly says that prophets like Moses and Isa, peace be upon them, werent Muslim, and he failed to comprehend what is a Muslim in the first place, he think Muslims are those who worship the Kabbah problaby, well i am sorry, but a Muslim by definition is a man who submits himself to Allah, the most merciful, the most compassionate, and thats it.
So they were Muslims, he talked about Isa peace be upon him drinking "wine", but little does he know, that what Isa, peace be upon him drank, is just unfermented grape juice, that has no alcohol indeed, then he shows some verses from the bible about Isa peace be upon him being God, but we know as Muslims that the Bible is corrupted, and we cannot trust a corrupted source like the bible.
He proceeds to say that we "stole" prostation by Christians, but wait... didnt like Jews prostate before Christians did? that means Christians and Muslims stole prostation from the Jews? nah.
He says "how can we trust a book that came out 600 years after the Bible.
That is simple to explain, basically i can just debunk this argument by saying, why did Allah, Subannah Wa Tala, reveal the Torah before the Bible?
Simply the Torah and the Bible were meant for the people of that time, Allah Subanna Wa Tala, never promised to protect them as He did in the Quran, why did he wait 600 years? cause things happened during those 600 years, the Bible isnt the ultimate revelation as it doesnt contain those things, while the Quran does.
As i have no time to finish this comment i will continue tomorrow (no its not because i have nothing to disprove the argument i just have a life.)
Actually we have found ancient scrolls written by original authors of many prophets claiming they worship YHWH and that they’re JEWS
Bro by definition we are Muslims. We submit to the word of Christ who saved us from separation of God.
The difference is Muslims don’t accept Jesus Christ as the lord and savior which is the pin point of Christianity, you cannot inherit the kingdom of heaven if not through Jesus christ
I can't tell if your joking or not joking
@@black.7381 I’m dead serious Muslims acknowledge Jesus as a prophet not the messiah and not the son of god, Roman’s 10:9-11 says That if you confess with your mouth, "Jesus is Lord," and believe in your heart that God raised him from the dead, you will be saved. For it is with your heart that you believe and are justified, and it is with your mouth that you confess and are saved
Islam is an anti-cancer way of life. No alcohol, no bacon, no promiscuity, and that's just the basic stuff. Faith does immeasurable things to benefit human health. It therefore creates a naturally healthy people and society. It's a no-brainer that health is what every human seeks.
It also does honor killings to women, abuses them and they promote terrorist attacks. You CAN be healthy and NOT join the demonic Islam cult you know
https: //youtu. be/ Hu7-vb7WNlY?feature=shared
Anyone commenting false about Islam, please watch this and then repent.
"It's not the eyes that are blind, but the hearts". Instead of sticking to a single person's arguments, try to listen to it from some Muslim scholars too.
One last thing I have to say: It's been 1400+ years since the introduction of Quran, and even now, as how Quran states it, HUMAN HAD NEVER MADE A VERSE SIMILIAR TO ONE IN QURAN.
That's a truth and NO ONE can prove me wrong in this !!
I feel sorry for you guys because you are grown up in a society where people always criticizes Islam, and not try to understand a word from Quran. May Allah guide you guys, Aameen
t's been 1400+ years since the introduction of Quran, and even now, as how Quran states it, HUMAN HAD NEVER MADE A VERSE SIMILIAR TO ONE IN QURAN.
That's a truth and NO ONE can prove me wrong in this !!
I feel sorry for you guys because you are grown up in a society where people always criticizes Islam, and not try to understand a word from Quran. May Allah guide you guys, Aameen
mohammed (police be upon him)
@@amen_sadique_k_tbro 😂😂😂😂😂.u living in your imajanary world . why there is no tranlation exiested😅😅
0:36 actually the word "Christian" is mentioned in the bible
Acts 11:26 "And when he had found him, he brought him unto Antioch. And it came to pass, that a whole year they assembled themselves with the church, and taught much people. And the disciples were called Christians first in Antioch."
Acts 26:28 "Then Agrippa said unto Paul, Almost thou persuadest me to be a Christian."
1 Peter 4:16 "Yet if any man suffer as a Christian, let him not be ashamed; but let him glorify God on this behalf."
that's from the KJV version
the Greek for "Christian" is Χριστιανούς (Christianos)
"Christ" is Χριστός - meaning the annointed one
ιανοί is a suffix that indicates relation/association
so Christians are either of Christ or of the "anointed one" (the Messiah)
It gotta be mentioned in at least one of the 800 bible versions
In a book which was "published/released" after 1600 years of jesus pbuh's death.
Come on do better. We are looking for the word of god not the word which is corrupted by man
@@fardinrayhanrifat3935 XD? There are complete copies of the New Testament before Muhammad that are basically the same as today’s bible
@@user-tz8yf2sb1t Watch Misquoting Jesus by Bart Ehrman
whats an icon in your meaning here
I was going to watch this but then I realized I just missed Asr. Thank you Kyle for reminding me! 😊
True, bro. I am going to pray now.
Ramadan Kareem guys!
alhamdhulillah
😂😂 شيكور وليد بلادي 😂😂
I left Islam. after watching this video
Islam only works in a vacuum.
This pretty much sums up my thoughts around it.
looking into things from a single side isn't wise
Bruh... allah hates sin and refuses to even directly interact with his own creation/mankind on earth... but, for some reason... even though he would NEVER allow himself to dirty/lower himself by coming to earth and interacting with man (even though he created them in the first place) directly... he literally brings man into his heavenly home itself and dirties it that way.
Not only that, but he orders man on earth not to commits sins, not to have lust/sex with women, not to drink alcohol, etc.... BUT THEN, for some reason (even though he'd never interact with mankind or show himself because its beneath him/ungodly), once you get to HEAVEN, not only can you drink alcohol and have sex and sin... but 'supposed' believers are promised dozens upon dozens of virgins who you can fck to your heart's content, that allah then re-virginizes for you to have sex with again and again... and not only can you now drink alcohol in heaven (AKA, taint god's home/presence/name), but he will provide you with "rivers of wine" for you to drink to your heart's content!!!
That's disgusting! It's literally anti-god. Why would God ever allow sin into his holy, heavenly abode??? Especially, why would he allow sin and unholy behavior in heaven... SPECIFICALLY when allah is supposedly so separate, holy, and pure that he won't even physically go to man/earth and interact with the sinful lifeforms that He himself created (thus dirtying himself). Its illogical and makes no sense. Its sinful and disgusting, and if allah truly kept separate from mankind on Earth to keep/maintain his separate, oneness, holiness... then why would he EVER allow that kind of behavior/sin to exist/occur in the purity of HEAVEN itself?!?!?!
There's sooo many other reasons why Muhammed/Islam is so messed up/dirty/sinful/non-godlike... but that alone should bring you a great number of questions to ask yourself. Then, when you include the Quran introducing the bird-goddesses in addition to god himself (which not only destroys the supposed sanctity of the oneness of allah, but also destroys the eternal and infallibility of the Word of god itself); when you include the disgusting behaviors of Muhammed (who was supposedly a moral example for mankind for time immemorial) and compare them to the perfect, sinless life of Jesus; and the inconsistencies all throughout the Quran and the Hadiths and the history of Islam itself... it should open the flood-gates for a tsunami of questions to ask yourself concerning the truth/lies within islam, and it will hopefully set you on the right path towards the single, one, perfect, true God.
Good luck my friend, and may God give you peace, direction, and forgiveness as you begin your journey to finding the everlasting, unyielding, loving, and spotless truth of God.@@ahmedmahamud3015
Islam works like the devil, on the same page as LGBTQ+, just remember what the + stands for,
It's there for a reason.
@@ahmedmahamud3015 Exactly. I can't reason you out of something you haven't been reasoned into, espescially not through a comment section. Alas, I urge you to wake up.
Who is the guy in the video? Does he have a channel?
Yes he does he’s UA-cam is jeem apologetics bros vids slap 🗿 and the loves to
Islamophobia is everywhere now
Bruh
We don't hate Muslims we hate Muslims who use stupid arguments to "debunk" Christianity but get rabid when someone makes a valid argument against Islam.
I left Islam a year ago and i wish i was born a christian instead ❤ i love my lord Jesus christ of Nazareth
You left the truth and now you’re following the drafted Bible
@@Kanye249 I actually studied Islam and quran very well before leaving it ,also After studying the christian faith ,I have found the truth in it and I'm satisfied ❤️❤️
May God bless and guide on your path you brother. Welcome home ☦✝
@@user-bm7ng6fk7v hope you repent back to Allah he’s the most merciful he accepts everyone back Allah is the only one true God and Jesus is the messenger of Allah
@@024Nimma Thank you i'm your Sister in Christ 🙏
We christians don't worship the same God as Muslims, they worship something else.
Something with red horns. A fallen angel as some would say
@@Forty-Juan Maybe
@@Forty-Juanlol, fallen angel thats funny, because in islam angels are created to obey god, and it does not make sense for lucifer to have that free will like a human being lol, god gives us the free will to chose if we worship him or not but he did not give the same to the angels.
also satan in islam is not an angel, hes a jin and had free will.
@@zainmohyuddin2142 i do not subscribe to the schizophrenic ramblings of a pedophile warlord.
i was having doubts of becoming a Muslim, but thanks to this, i now see that Islam is the truth
Then like share and subscribe. 🤣
The Prophet Muhammad (peace be upon him) is considered to be perfect. We strive towards the Sunnah in order to try and replicate his perfect example. The claim that the "intention" isn't really there is false. Yes, before we perform the prayer, we make the intention to pray for God only. However, this isn't robotic as the expectation is that the correct intention to pray is within the heart. God knows what is within our heart, and only He knows what our true intentions are. The physical act of making intention to worship solely for God doesn't necessarily make your intention valid if that isn't your true intention.
Piss be upon him
Your "prophet" (warlord) married a 9 year old lmao
Unintentional comedy at the start of the video:
"It's been a while since . . "
*large hermit beard*
Lord Jesus Christ Son of God Have Mercy upon me a sinner
The Bible proves that Muhammad (saws) is a true Prophet!
-
[The word "Prophet" comes from the word "prophecy"]
-
Deuteronomy 18:22
"If a prophet speaks in the name of the Lord but the thing does not take place or prove true, it is a word that the Lord has not spoken."
-
In the previous verse, it is asked how one can distinguish a TRUE prophet from a FALSE prophet.
-
The answer was that only a TRUE prophet makes prophecies that ACTUALLY happen.
-
And you know what? Muhammad (saws) made HUNDREDS of prophecies that are very precise and yet ACTUALLY happened!
Matthew 7:15 “Watch out for false prophets. They come to you in sheep’s clothing, but inwardly they are ferocious wolves.
@@lcrevilla The Bible proves that Muhammad (saws) is a true Prophet!
-
[The word "Prophet" comes from the word "prophecy"]
-
Deuteronomy 18:22
"If a prophet speaks in the name of the Lord but the thing does not take place or prove true, it is a word that the Lord has not spoken."
-
In the previous verse, it is asked how one can distinguish a TRUE prophet from a FALSE prophet.
-
The answer was that only a TRUE prophet makes prophecies that ACTUALLY happen.
-
And you know what? Muhammad (saws) made HUNDREDS of prophecies that are very precise and yet ACTUALLY happened!
Thanks you this video opened my eyes and made my faith in islam stronger 😂😂
Then like share and subscribe so other Muslims open their eyes too, their faith in Islam gets stronger etc. Please do it if you care about other Muslims.
@@chr_my I did this thank you
🤡
Learn more about Orthodox Christianity,it is only truth!
@@chr_mywe did, had a great laugh and now we're preparing a refutation 😅
In 1948 the Qumran scrolls were discovered. One of the most important of these scrolls, is known as the Isaiah scroll. On this scroll the book of Isaiah is written. This scroll was written in the first century CE. Apart from one paragraph, the book of Isaiah on this scroll, is exactly the same as the book of Isaiah on the masoretic text. In other words this scroll proves that a basic tenet of Islam (deliberate corruption of books of the Tanakh) is not true. The Isaiah scroll proves that Islam is a false religion.
One small correction: 1st century AD
@@kevinjypiter6445 :-) I was trying to be neutral.
What about, The Epistle of Barnabas
Isaiah was from the 9th century BC, so the scroll came 1000 years later. It doesn't prove anything as it could easily have been corrupted beforehand.
@@ShapurDDThen YOUR God has deliberately deceived people, by stating IN HIS QURAN that Muslims are to rely on the Gospel and the Torah to verify the reliability of the Quran. Dude, your religion is holed below the waterline. This is a FATAL issue that Islam simply cannot resolve.
I am happy that we can agree Jesus Christ is the way.
The only way.
What do u mean we I’m atheist
But of that day and hour knoweth no [man], no, not the angels of heaven, but my Father only. (Matthew 24:36)
‘I am going away and coming back to you.’ If you loved Me, you would rejoice because I said, ‘I am going to the Father,’ for My Father is greater than I. (John 14:28)
And this is eternal life, that they may know You, the only true God, and Jesus Christ whom You have sent (John 17:3)
@@Ilovebullyingfurrystransplandp convert to Christianity than
@@Ilovebullyingfurrystransplandp Christian artifacts have been discovered recently, if you look into it you may want to revert to Christianity!
Though that's entirely your choice to look into it, just saying Christianity is confirmed truth.
Let people believe in what they want to believe, it is not your say to contradict what the Noble Qur’an says, that is the word of Allah
Finally to see someone debate the Muslims from a Christian perspective
ua-cam.com/video/KNLIRyxllHs/v-deo.htmlsi=xB3ecxQW8MIt7MJB
Thank You for the very informative video, Kyle. It's very interesting. Will you ever cover the books that you have behind you in your videos? Happy New Year!
Glory to Christ and his Holy Orthodox Catholic Church ☦️☝️
I see you everywhere, literally on every Christian video lol.
Imho we should all learn about taqiyya. It's very, very important to be informed about it. Thx.
Yup its the basis for Islam. Lying for the benefit of the cult.
Taqiyya is what Paul said in Romans 3:7: "But if through my lie God's truth abounds to his glory, why am I still being condemned as a sinner?
@@lawyer73 What is tawriya then, or muruna, kitman, hiyal, muda'rat, Q4-157 Allah lying to Christians, etc etc?
@@chr_my Muhammed peace be on him said: It is not lawful to lie except in three cases: Something the man tells his wife to please her, to lie during war, and to lie in order to bring peace between the people.” (Jami` at-Tirmidhi 1938).
if you are referring to tukya, then you must know that it has nothing to do with Islam and Muslims. That's pretending of shias, which they us as part of their theology in order to deceive who they want to deceive. And it has nothing to do with Islam. Maybe they learned it from Machiavelli, or from Paul, who said: "For if the truth of God hath more abounded through my lie unto his glory; why yet am I also judged as a sinner? (Romans, 3:7), or from his statement: "But what does it matter? The important thing is that in every way, whether from false motives or true, Christ is preached. And because of this I rejoice." (Philippians 1:18), or his statement: "But granting that I myself did not burden you, I was crafty, you say, and got the better of you by deceit." (2. Corinthians 12:16)
andrew tate converting to islam is the biggest troll... as if he is actually muslim... he does it for views fame and to increase relations with dubai etc
im not muslim, im christian, but i have to say this channel is just sad...
Thank you
Bro.. thank you. Thats what ive been saying
Not an argument
Right?!?
Same thing with the channels that cater to right wing politics, the fact that there's a fanbase for this is unfortunate
Every knee will bow ✝️
Beautiful
you don't even bow daily, what makes you think everyone will bow to Jesus a prophet?
@@mysticx5149 proof he doesn't bow daily proof Jesus Is a prophet?
@@gregkareem9824 the proof is in my Quran, now let me ask you how is Jesus god?
@@mysticx5149 Islam is a fake religion
HELP THE FIRST PART IS SO FUNNY
haha, I was about to reply to you but this is hilarious 😅. Good luck buddy
You need to collab with Apostate Prophet.
that man is not someone worth collaborating with
The only problem is that the Apostate Prophet is Atheist
@@AliTanoli-cq3jsand David Wood
Why? Is he too boring for your liking?@@AliTanoli-cq3js
@@AliTanoli-cq3js If he made you (a muslim) mad, then he definitely is someone worth collaborating with.
Kyle I don’t know if you edit your own videos or someone else does but unreal editing genuinely dude 🔥
Just watch DC Dawah...
BTW, thanks for strenghtening my iman bro!
DC Dawah's video was not good
why no one talking about how muslim arabs killed iranians and non-muslims?
Bcz it didn't happen clown
And how something like that in relevant of either religion is true or not ?? Don't u know what countries did the world wars and the invasion of islamic countries?) lol
Quick reminder that not all Protestants are iconoclasts. Especially not most evangelicals.
The closest that most evangelicals get is the idea that some people treat icons like idols, which is certainly true. Just like the crying Mary statue.
Catholics always assume stuff about protestantism that isn't true. From my experience on the internet ive seen way more catholic iconoclasts than protestant iconoclasts.
muslims in the comments be like: "y-y-y-you're yapping, islam fastest growing religion, y-y-y-you're misrepresenting, [insert strawman argument which I can't back up after someone responds and refutes it because I copy pasted it], I-I-I-I d-d-d-don't understand the trinity therefore it is wrong. [proceeds not to respond to the arguments].
One minute in and I hear the worst argument imaginable, then i knew this whole video is not worth it ☠
to learning tawheed will increase you in knowledge but trinity will crucify your braincells💀
it is the fastest growing, and christian are leaving because its true the trinity does not make sense and always sound like partialism or modelism when someone is explaining it, you know what they say, the trinity is a mystery
bruh you literally sound like the parody I commented @@zainmohyuddin2142 🤣
@@TheCommentor- ay just saying, there is a reason why it is the fastest growing religion and ay, ya can't stop us might as well join us right
I am a Muslim but research8ng Islam is actually kind of getting ruined by random people
If you're sincere then look at research from both perspectives, and learn the falsehoods of other religions as well. You'll see every other major religion is so much more fake than what people believe Islam is.
There are a lot of false information and islamophobia out there so be careful.
I have done mine and now if you put the sun and the moon in my hands i will not leave islam
This video and its accompanying discourse starkly illustrate a deficiency in critical thinking among certain adherents of Christianity. Many christians and especially in the comment section appear to uncritically accept assertions about Islam from individuals lacking in depth of understanding, while resorting to biblical passages as substantiation despite their inherent bias. Assertions such as "Allah is a false God and Islam is a false religion because my religion says so" betray a lack of intellectual rigor and a reliance on dogmatic assertions rather than reasoned argumentation 🤦🏽♂️
This comment starkly illustrates a deficiency in critical thinking among certain adherents of Islam. Many Muslims and especially in the comment section appear to uncritically accept assertions about Christianity from individuals lacking in depth of understanding, while resorting to Quranic passages as substantiation despite their inherent bias. Assertions such as "Jesus wasn't crucified and Christianity is a false religion because my religion says so" betray a lack of intellectual rigor and a reliance on dogmatic assertions rather than reasoned argumentation 🤦♂
Your own logic cooks you...every...single...time
Being called an idolater is rich coming from someone whose religion's central part is a faceless cube with 0 symbolism along with a black rock inside an aluminium vulva. When you point that out, they suddenly discern veneration and worship.
It doesn't matter what a pipe said. Catholicism is false.
An idolator worships a depiction of their god. Islam tells us to pray towards the Ka'aba not to it.
@@nahzea so kissing and venerating a faceless object that has 0 symbolism is less of an idolatry than venerating a depiction of a God that helps us in prayers and communication? Great logic.
@@bljet4388 there's a difference between veneration and worship. In worship you submit to whatever it is you are worshipping. We don't submit to the Ka'abah, we submit to Allah, the owner of the Ka'abah. We venerate the Ka'abah for it's significance.
Also, people touch and kiss the black stone for religious purposes: it can act as an expiation of sins due to Allah forgiving the sins which have been absorbed by the stone (search up about how the black stone became black if you want to know more about it), it is a miracle of God, and it is the cornerstone of the Ka'abah, etc.
This is just from the best of my knowledge, but Allah knows best.
@@nahzeabro your hero married a 6 year old 🤡
Blessed is Kyle☦️🙏 Please pray for Father Spyridon. I hear he’s hospitalized and is awaiting surgery.❤
Peace brother to you and to the father from the holy trinity ☦️☺️
Really? I pray that God will heal him and become healthy again to spread truth across the world. Lord have Mercy❤☝
May God protect him. He's one of the best out there to make the deepest of orthodoxy accessible to non-orthodox
Father Spyridon is Thank God in a stable and good condition and now recovering. Praise to be God.
@@024NimmaAmin. Happy to hear that.
I’m an atheist ⚛️ but watching people debunk other religions is interesting ngl
Are there certain parts of each religion that you don't like/agree with/turned you away from them, specifically? Or, do you just not believe in any sort of god/divine power, just in general?
@user-xp5id1kh4r a lot of us are uninterested in religion because of how many transcripts get things very wrong scientifically
Atheists like OP believe that God isn't real, while an agnostic like me doesn't deny a God, but just doesn't involve themselves in religion
@@user-xp5id1kh4r
I presume that Calizen believes in the Holy Trinity: "proton, electron, neutron" & the "divine power" is the nuclear binding energy of Atom ⚛️.
Ahmeen.@@The_Green_Man_OAP
Now that makes me wonder: is he a Dyothelitist who believes in both the Strong and the Weak Nuclear Forces as separate forces, or an apostate that believes they are one in the same... aka, a Monothelitist?
@@The_Green_Man_OAP
15K views in 7 hours. Kyle, your channel is growing fast! Glory to God!
Share the video
It's a good video
Nope it's the tittle
@@josephjohnchombo5127 he was at 5K subs when I started watching him. Now he's at 28K. I'd call that growth!
Surah As Saff...
I really miss the days were everyone didn't give a fuck about wich religion you were because it didn't and it still doesn't matter 😞
Brihl tf u talkin about rn in 21 century we have most religious unbiased society