I seen Sandra the other day, such a nice woman, she was very wary walking about I asked if it was her and I could see she looked at me to see if I was friend or foe and I said don’t worry I’m a friend as simple as that and that many more people agree with her now than disagree, I spoke to her about James English, who’s show wasn’t nearly as big when she was on but now he’s interviewed some of the most famous people in the world actually the most famous guy at the time that Tate guy and he was first to interview him, anyway Sandra is a very nice woman and an academic who deserves respect in any case, regardless of your belief, Luke deserved a fair trial, there was astonishing corruption from a constable called David Mathews who just happened to have a brother who was a sky reporter and the papers went all out on Luke when he was a 14 year old boy due to this corrupt police officers actions, he’s obviously been dismissed, he was visiting drug dealing families and taking lines of cocaine and routinely taking amphetamine was dismissed because the entire community considered him an utter scum bag, never had there ever been a situation where one officer was universally disliked by the community, and he was instrumental in putting Luke behind bars, I hope he gets his judgment for his actions one day.
@@bethryan9077 if you remove Mathews from the picture, Luke probably wouldn’t even have arrested, they had literally zero evidence, furthermore they actually had evidence that suggested he couldn’t possible have done this, however a calculated smear campaign was launched and vital information and false information was fed to the media via this officer and his sky news reporter brother, they turned the community against the whole family, they had their business burned out, and the whole time that rat knew it was about convicting that lad, not finding the truth, Luke was suspect from the second it was on, nothing about her psychotic brother who routinely hit her and was just released from a mental institution and it was common knowledge he used to follow his sister about like a creep, him and his weird mates, he acted like she was his girlfriend or something and tried to even bully Luke, but Luke’s brother would have pinched his face in so he didn’t give him any crap, seriously we know as a community, these are all lads my age at the time, I seen stuff personally, stuff was known about that brother of hers well before the incident, he’s not only got off with it, another guys convicted and doing his sentence, that’s justice, that can happen to anyone, if something happens to your girlfriend and they have no evidence, I guarantee you are getting the jail for it, and if the public don’t buy it, they will find a way to sell it, back then anyway, now with online stuff, they would have figured out it was the brother by probably strange messages and stuff, restraining her like a possessive boyfriend and it wasn’t just protecting his little sister he abused her that’s reminiscent of an abusive boyfriend.
It was an horrific violent murder,Luke would have had to have walked home covered in blood yet he want spotted by anyone,then he would have had to clean every bit of blood DNA from his clothes,skin,house door and the inside of his house,c'mon people that would be impossible and Luke Mitchell is 100% innocent
What's the story about the girl Kara Van Nuil who luke held a knife to her throat while wearing a balaclava at cadets I believe? Was this the knife indecent that got him thrown out of cadets?
I stayed in Mayfield when this horrific crime happened. Now in Dalkeith. I am ashamed to say i thought Luke was guilty. Had a son 13 at that time who was also at St David's School. Talk at school, he is a weirdo he is guilty. After watching murder in a small town, i was shocked. My son told me to research all these talks on youtube about the case. He believes now Luke is Innocent. Most people i chat too in the area, also believe he is Innocent. I put a few posts on my FB about the case. It gets shyed Its like people are afraid to let others see their oponion has changed. Before the Jones's moved to easthouses they stayed few doors from me. When the kids where younger. Jodies brother used to go fishing with my sons and husband. We used to take pur caravans up the grannets in the summer. I would be up for doing what ever i can to help fly fifers. Perhaps you would be up for asking people out here in my area what they think ? See if we can spread the word further. Lets try and get rid of the fear of talking about this ?
@@kathleenseath5570 Just to let you know, though she alludes to it, she was Never at the trial, not one day & so, she knows Nothing about what the jury were 'given'. She Pretends she had all the documentation from the trial & always used the words 'case papers', now she uses the words 'case files', sounds more important. LOL. She was given some papers from the defence lawyers in relation to the Reasons for each of the appeal applications outlaid & so had the Reasons outlaid from the Crown why each failed. That's it, she had Nothing else. Then the appeal she did down the track, that also failed. Great con artist, nothing more. When you want to see the results of the endless brainwashing by a very cunning witchypoo, look in the mirror.
Maybe those experienced people that know about the case Can come out and explain Why Sandra lean Never taken any action to stop the destruction of productions in the Luke Mitchell case
@@theflyfiferspodcast depends what you mean As I think that Luke is s innocent But question Sandra lean and her book of misinformation I don't think that would take more than 10 minutes Not sure if that would make a good pod
Look get Sandra lean back on She can explain her 21 years involvement with the Mitchell case She is a liar She decided to take up a course at university because she was afraid that they murder was still out there and her kids go to the school in the area So she ops to travel miles away to study. Oh aye that does make sense Then in her book she lied about Shane She then lied about Luke's second girlfriend She lied about knowing that there was a dedtruction of evidence happening She lied about The court transcripts Sandra lean let's see the evidence The paper trail that you were wrongly advised by the legal team Oh and let's not forget that Sandra lean has full autonomy on Luke Mitchell Sandra lean could have had expert help from overseas But she will not let those who want to help see them She even dictates to the legal team on what they can see or not see Sandra lean should take the offer of taking a lie detector test As Scott Forbes has mentioned There is a pot of money there for lie detecting Sandra lean you are a liar and a manipulative person you have all the traits of a psychopath In fact you should be analysed by professional profilers You are running a scam And this will be proven
@@Ron.M-yo9ht I'm new to this and have noticed lies from sandra, scott and lukes mum. It's very strange. Don't they want luke to be released? There is only so many books they can sell.
#freelukemitchell , there's so much I've seen on different podcasts talking about certain aspects on this case and my point is why's there so many secrets from police Scotland destroying the evidence that is needed from Luke Mitchell lawyers for his proven innocence and to have many more other things that if ya'll need to know more about this case and the fact that Luke Mitchell is innocent really go deep into this world of corruption from police Scotland and am only talking about this case but I do know a lot of other people going through the same thing free the innocent men and women because Luke Mitchell did not do this murder do you really think that a whole bunch of clever people from all ages would stick with the narrative that Luke Mitchell is innocent if we didn't know what the truth is and what a lie is and I cannot stand a liar so that is one view of many different stories about how or why we get together for a peaceful protest because this is wrong to destroy evidence and lie especially about a 14 year old girl who was murdered by someone who is still walking the streets probably.
They're nothing but a pair of Very practised Con Artists who say Whatever because they have books of BS to sell ya. Her former profession was that of a Hypnotist, he was formerly an Armed robber. They hooked up after he had tried to sell a BS story to the press for 50,000 pounds but the friend was seen on CCTV with No scratches on his face & had a solid alibi. They've been partners in hoodwinking the public for Money ever since. When that totally biased Ch 5 documentary went to air, Scotty boy had his part to play, of course. The friend had died in the meantime so he repeated that Lie & added an extra lie & said the guy had a knife. LOL. Scotty boy has a real thing for knives & tells many stories about young guys & finding knives all around town right at that time. For many of his videos he is in a room in his flat, front & centre on the wall is his phallic symbol. Guess what it is. Some other countries like the U.S., have the full transcripts of court testimony & all evidence available to the public when the trial is over. Not Scotland. Got it? Update - Some transcripts from the trial have been released. sandra is now hiding under her bed with 20 jars, many near full to the brim already. LMAO. Forbes is doing the same, only bigger jars.
Luke Mitchell went before a court of Law with 20 Chapters of evidence against him, which is a Lot for a sole defendant. The High Court Judge & Jurors - Saw & Heard that evidence & found him Guilty, Beyond A Reasonable Doubt. And after only 5 hours adjudicating due to such a Strong case. The general public know Nothing of that Actual evidence. The biggest & longest trial in Scottish history, 42 days. He has had all the appeals he will Ever get & the Innocence Project rejected his application due to the Overwhelming evidence that showed Exactly what he did to this poor girl. He was also convicted that same day for being a long term drug dealer. He sold his drugs to fellow School kids, no matter who they were or how old they were. He carried his skunting knife daily to cut his hash. The knife that Disappeared, with The jacket And his balaclava. His behaviours in totality were so sociopathic Before this murder, the kids called him the savage. His own Brother testified Against him & he nor their father have had Anything to do with him since the trial Nor have they spoken to that so-called mother since. They sure as hell have Nothing to do with this Shameful campaign, which is nothing but a nefarious marketing ploy to sell their books about Nothing & getting away with it Still because they know damn well that the public are totally in the dark about the Facts presented at Trial. Only the naive & the ignorant fall for it all. His highly sadistic Premeditated crime was so heinous & wicked it's likely that he'll Never get out. Sandra Lean & now Scott Forbes wrote books of BS to line their Own pockets & all the plotted media hoo ha for over 3 years on utube videos has some people hypnotised because that's the Whole Aim. Of Course they blame the cops, that's how Both lowly Con Artists rake in the hard-done-by members of society in particular. He tried to stage the scene as if a maniacal fiend had come across Jodi & somehow got her over & through that broken section of the stone wall & went berserk with a knife, yet she never made a sound. It's a Fact that most of the cuts were After death. He cajoled her with pot to Their place in the woods & knocked her out, had to, he was a simpy punk, the severe contusion on her brain told That story. The witness noticed the bulge in a pocket of the jacket. That had to be something substantial in the pocket to stand out in a jacket that was big & bulky for that twerp. Lean nor now Forbes, have Ever spoke about the contusion on Jodi's brain & it was substantial. They don't want Anyone to know that Jodi was knocked out cold. The bruising & abrasions were all to her head, neck & face areas Only, being punched & kicked when she was on the Ground. Their various BS stories saying that she was 'fighting for her life' are Not True. He thought he was smarter than the cops & told his mother that after the initial police questioning that night. She stated that Publicly in her interview with James English. He was Not & neither was She. She who worked hard to cover it all up. The crown put forth that he went back. In total he couldn't account for 3 hours. The police didn't know what time Jodi was attacked or died when speaking to him that night yet his false alibi was for that exact time frame of her death. What a Very telling Coincidence. Luke was Not home in that time frame of 5 to 5.30 & so, did not know if his brother was or not. Luke had left to meet Jodi before his brother got home from work. They reeled that poor lad into it the Next Day when the mother had sobered up. Their statements changed every time the cops went back to tell them info they found out, didn't match. They changed the alibi 3 times within the 1st week. Lean & Forbes have Never told that Fact. Jodi's grandmother, her sister & boyfriend realised they'd repeated to the cops what Luke had Told Them about the actions of the dog & so they amended their statement about that detail, that was All. Now I see that Lean has a big banner & posters as her next hoodwinking ploy, "MIA FOUND HER". The dog did Not climb over & through the V in the wall & so into the woods, ONLY Luke DID. It was proven that his torch did Not have the scope to have seen the body which was behind a big log & amongst bushes - on that pitch dark, rainy, starless night, At All. Lean always uses the wording of 'case papers' to Pretend that she had all the documents & all the statements from the trial, she does Not & Never has. She had paperwork from his defence lawyer for the appeal process from way back at that time, Nothing else. Over 40 police & seasoned investigators worked this case very carefully for a Long time. The police did an Excellent job to put that scumbag psychopathic child killer Exactly where he needs to be.
People who have information are scared to be known, I just wish they would come forward. The jury were not given all of the evidence so you would think that at least one of them would speak out. The justice system is a joke and it's scary 😦
omg & you meany Leany cult members expect the jury believe her never ending Garbage just because you do. LOL. Doh. Just to let you know, though she alludes to it, she was Never at the trial, not one day & so, she knows Nothing about what they were 'given'. She Pretends she had all the documentation from the trial & always used the words 'case papers', now she uses the words 'case files', sounds more important. LOL. She was given some papers from the defence lawyers in relation to the Reasons for each of the appeal applications outlaid & so had the Reasons outlaid from the Crown why each failed. That's it, she had Nothing else. Then the appeal she did, that also failed. Great con artist, nothing more.
@bethryan . If you mean she is Sandra ? She never claimed to be at the trial 1 day she had a business to run . Beth, why don't you go on this show and put your side across? These guys will treat you with most utter respect and fairness . You can tell us what happened at trial ? Seems you must have been there. 🙃👍
I’ll kindly answer you here Val since Forbes had me blocked on Toals podcast Shane names the porn site he used before looking at car websites It’s in black and white Val. Shane’s words I can tell you the name of it if you want
@@ourwilliam2405he agrees to the name of a site he previously used - your point is? Also if you can explain how a 14 year old can batter, murder, mutilate, clean up all his dna but leave others there all within an hour that would be great! I’ve told you before I’m not interested in anything you have to say while hiding behind a false name. Guessing you’ve still not made any mates so your still trolling sites to engage in conversations with people 🤣
@@valyoung4104 Not what he previously used, the one he was using when he was home alone, when luke wasnt in the house, Shane was alone, no Luke or Corrine, all alone, You all believed he wasnt watching porn, I told you years ago that it would come out, and its slowly coming out now, the truth is coming,
@@ourwilliam2405 yes the truth is coming. Do you still believe a 14 year old battered, murdered, mutilated and cleaned up all his dna but left others there all within 50 mins?
Well Done Everyone I would Like to see them on more regular. Be good for the supporters to be able to ask questions they need answers too. There isn't anything these guys don't know about the case. We need to keep spreading the word !
Luke Mitchell was before a court of Law with 20 Chapters of evidence against him, which is a Lot for one defendant. The High Court Judge & Jurors - Saw & Heard that evidence & found him Guilty, Beyond A Reasonable Doubt. He has had all the appeals he will Ever get & the Innocence Project rejected his application due to the Overwhelming evidence that showed Exactly what he did to this poor girl Plus his previous degenerate & violent behaviours. His own Brother testified Against him & he nor their father have had Anything to do with Luke since the trial Nor that so-called mother. They sure as hell have Nothing to do with this Shameful campaign, that's all just a white-wash for Money. His highly sadistic Premeditated crime was so heinous & wicked it's likely that he'll Never get out. Sandra Lean & now Scott Forbes wrote books of BS to line their Own pockets & all the media hoo ha for over 3 years on utube videos has some people hypnotised because that's the Whole Aim. Yep they blame the cops that's how Both Con Artists rake in the hard-done-by members of society in particular. Over 40 police & seasoned investigators worked this case for a Long time & the cops did a Great job by putting that lowlife child ki##er Exactly where he needs to be.
@@kathleenseath5570 Hell to the no, I wouldn't be pleasant to sandra's brainwashed cult members for very long. And that would also mean I'd be straining at the bit around a sadistic child killer's fan club. Thanks anyway.
@@JGI43 Yeah everyone who isn't a numpty beast lover is a troll. Aren't you just Pathetic indeed. Oh deary me, someone is posting the True Facts, shock, horror, spit in your eye Truth. LMAO.
I was at the gathering near the High Court in April in Edinburgh this year, great to see local people from Midlothian and beyond fighting for Luke and Jodi's justice.
I never said she had them all. She has 80 percent. The fact is, she has them ! You know that we know, it's all going to come out sooner rather than later.. We are dignified, and do not wish to participate in mud flinging. I would watch your side of your story if you where to accept your invitation on their show ? Just the fact you will not do this speaks volumes !!
That's actually a really good point. Why do highly qualified legal experts ignore a particular case. Probably because they believe he is guilty, looking at the evidence. But then you get the people who watch a documentary, it becomes an obsession.
Violent individual, Easton, was incessantly battering students, early 90s, entering Potterrow discotheque.......landing uppercuts on them.......he walked in + out the Edinburgh court 16 ×, the sixteenth time the police shouted + yelled at the judge, "That's ridiculous!!" "That should be two years at least!" probably more aggressive than that.......Easton (first name) was battering students, the judge was saying "You're acquitted" every single time he appeared......then my Serbian friend, Zoran, hit someone once, & was immediately given six months jail......while Zoran was in jail, the guy he hit once was found guilty of murder, police refused to revise Zoran's sentence in light of that......Zoran had no previous, he'd got a musicology degree in Paris & had been a DJ in Serbia, & then decided to study Journalism in Edinburgh University.......& in April 1974, I was being invited into a secret society type thing.....guaranteeing the judge will do nothing if I stab or batter someone, they'll put it thru as a suicide if I kill someone.......they have a thing of divide + rule, make coloureds feel bias in the courts, stuff like that.
If I may say, something I noticed on your recent podcasts is that you have fallen into the trap of guilters being trolls and the like , People get blocked from their pages If they have a different opinion, then it becomes an echo chamber of truthers, no debate at all. So if people don’t believe he is innocent does that mean they are trolls ? You wonder why people won’t speak out from the other side ? Who is the other side ? It’s not the Jones, The case is Mitchell V The Crown You want people to comment, right ? Have you seen the infighting between the groups, the fall outs ? The bitching? The transcripts are slowly coming out, and they’re different from Sandra’s story Let’s see what happens
Our William your a regular with comments, would you like to come on sit and give a version? I'll as before happily facilitate you to do so. Myself I see trolls as those who name call or take pops at an individuals person or the way they look etc. Not comments. Everyone is allowed an opinion. I've time in 2 weeks if you want to voice your side of the story. James.
@@theflyfiferspodcast Thanks for answering, and thanks for the invite, I’m quite happy to comment in the sections for the moment. But I do appreciate your invitation
Big mistake to assume he had to walk home covered in blood, he probably planned it had change of clothes gloves etc left at the scene.What happened to his PARKA? His brother initially said he was in the house preparing dinner,changed his statement and said luke wasnt in the house. Family of liars.
@@johnny_mcgee008 Stop spreading more & more Lies. Oh that's right, lying Leany & feral Forbes must have forgotten to mention that the Mitchells changed their story 3 times in one week, every time the coppers went back to tell them, Caught Out Lying ya Scumbags.
Very strange that none of the panel of Luke Mitchell supporters have got angry because other supporters called SL a lier SL lied about the hash that LM had Also lied about the other girlfriend Also lied about the court transcripts in fact her recent reply is even more ridiculous She says that she has no idea how others got hold of them In this statement It would indicate That she thinks she is the only one entitled to have any information about Luke It also now appears that she is the actual legal team Totally unbelievable She is a con woman
@@ALitScottyB323 Luke Mitchell went before a court of Law with 20 Chapters of evidence against him, which is a Lot for a sole defendant. The High Court Judge & Jurors - Saw & Heard that evidence & found him Guilty, Beyond A Reasonable Doubt. And after only 5 hours adjudicating due to such a Strong case. The general public know Nothing of that Actual evidence. The biggest & longest trial in Scottish history, 42 days. He has had all the appeals he will Ever get & the Innocence Project rejected his application due to the Overwhelming evidence that showed Exactly what he did to this poor girl. He was also convicted that same day for being a long term drug dealer. He sold his drugs to fellow School kids, no matter who they were or how old they were. He carried his skunting knife daily to cut his hash. The knife that Disappeared, with The jacket And his balaclava. His behaviours in totality were so sociopathic Before this murder, the kids called him the savage. His own Brother testified Against him & he nor their father have had Anything to do with him since the trial Nor have they spoken to that so-called mother since. They sure as hell have Nothing to do with this Shameful campaign, which is nothing but a nefarious marketing ploy for Lean & Forbes to sell their books about Nothing & getting away with it Still because they know damn well that the public are totally in the dark about the Facts presented at Trial. Only the naive & the ignorant fall for it all. His highly sadistic Premeditated crime was so heinous & wicked it's likely that he'll Never get out. Sandra Lean & now Scott Forbes wrote books of BS to line their Own pockets & all the plotted media hoo ha for over 3 years on utube videos has some people hypnotised because that's the Whole Aim. Of Course they blame the cops, that's how Both lowly Con Artists rake in the hard-done-by members of society in particular. He tried to stage the scene as if a maniacal fiend had come across Jodi & somehow got her over & through that broken section of the stone wall & went berserk with a knife, yet she never made a sound. It's a Fact that most of the cuts were After death. He cajoled her with pot to Their place in the woods & knocked her out, had to, he was a simpy punk, the severe contusion on her brain told That story. He premeditated everything he did. The witness noticed the bulge in a pocket of the jacket. That had to be something substantial in the pocket to stand out in a jacket that was big & bulky for that twerp. Lean nor now Forbes, have Ever spoke about the contusion on Jodi's brain & it was substantial. They don't want Anyone to know that Jodi was knocked out cold. The bruising & abrasions were all to her head, neck & face areas Only, being punched & kicked when she was on the Ground. Their various BS stories saying that she was 'fighting for her life' are Not True. He thought he was smarter than the cops & told his mother that after the initial police questioning that night. She stated that Publicly in her interview with James English. He was Not & neither was She. She who worked hard to cover it all up. The crown put forth that he went back. In total he couldn't account for 3 hours. The police didn't know what time Jodi was attacked or died when speaking to him that night yet his false alibi was for that exact time frame of her death. What a Very telling Coincidence. Luke was Not home in that time frame of 5 to 5.30 & so, did not know if his brother was or not. Luke had left to meet Jodi before his brother got home from work. They reeled that poor lad into it the Next Day when the mother had sobered up. Their statements changed every time the cops went back to tell them info they found out, didn't match. They changed the alibi 3 times within the 1st week. Lean & Forbes have Never told that Fact. Jodi's grandmother, her sister & boyfriend realised they'd repeated to the cops what Luke had Told Them about the actions of the dog & so they amended their statement about that detail, that was All. Now I see that Lean has a big banner & posters as her next hoodwinking ploy, "MIA FOUND HER". The dog did Not climb over & through the V in the wall & so into the woods, ONLY Luke DID. It was proven that his torch did Not have the scope to have seen the body which was behind a big log & amongst bushes - on that pitch dark, rainy, starless night, At All. Lean always uses the wording of 'case papers' to Pretend that she had all the documents & all the statements from the trial, she does Not & Never has. She had paperwork from his defence lawyer for the appeal process from way back at that time, Nothing else. Over 40 police & seasoned investigators worked this case very carefully for a Long time. The police did an Excellent job to put that scumbag psychopathic child killer Exactly where he needs to be. There you go, some Homework for You.
I don't think anyone gets called a troll when they voice their opinion. I think it's when people with fake accounts or accounts with users, as the name, etc, hurl abusive comments. I think that's acceptable for the troll label. Certainly anytime James mentions a troll I know that's what he thinks. He can't speak for anyone else. 😉🛼🛼♥️
@@theflyfiferspodcast Why are you deleting my replies over & over again? I will remind you that UA-cam has strict rules & regulations about the comment section, which is a Public forum. I am the public. If you continue with your underhanded practices I will report your channel to admin. BTW - then there's something called Freedom of Speech. How many other people's posts are you deleting also? Listen up, everyone can See the number count of replies & See how many are Missing. I am logging what you have done & have now made a copy of this direct message to you.
Im still on the fence about it like I've no doubt about police corruption hell look at the ice cream war in Glasgow during the 80s and one of those dudes is still advocating lukes innocence. But on the other hand, when it comes out, he has another appeal rejected because he is a "sexual threat" to women I find it hard to believe he never done it
![Chris Langan - The Interview THEY Didn't Want You To See - CTMU [Full Version; Timestamps]](/img/n.gif)
Really good watch, could hear you all clearly
I seen Sandra the other day, such a nice woman, she was very wary walking about I asked if it was her and I could see she looked at me to see if I was friend or foe and I said don’t worry I’m a friend as simple as that and that many more people agree with her now than disagree, I spoke to her about James English, who’s show wasn’t nearly as big when she was on but now he’s interviewed some of the most famous people in the world actually the most famous guy at the time that Tate guy and he was first to interview him, anyway Sandra is a very nice woman and an academic who deserves respect in any case, regardless of your belief, Luke deserved a fair trial, there was astonishing corruption from a constable called David Mathews who just happened to have a brother who was a sky reporter and the papers went all out on Luke when he was a 14 year old boy due to this corrupt police officers actions, he’s obviously been dismissed, he was visiting drug dealing families and taking lines of cocaine and routinely taking amphetamine was dismissed because the entire community considered him an utter scum bag, never had there ever been a situation where one officer was universally disliked by the community, and he was instrumental in putting Luke behind bars, I hope he gets his judgment for his actions one day.
Yeah, only one copper was responsible for putting him tightly behind bars, sure.
@@bethryan9077 if you remove Mathews from the picture, Luke probably wouldn’t even have arrested, they had literally zero evidence, furthermore they actually had evidence that suggested he couldn’t possible have done this, however a calculated smear campaign was launched and vital information and false information was fed to the media via this officer and his sky news reporter brother, they turned the community against the whole family, they had their business burned out, and the whole time that rat knew it was about convicting that lad, not finding the truth, Luke was suspect from the second it was on, nothing about her psychotic brother who routinely hit her and was just released from a mental institution and it was common knowledge he used to follow his sister about like a creep, him and his weird mates, he acted like she was his girlfriend or something and tried to even bully Luke, but Luke’s brother would have pinched his face in so he didn’t give him any crap, seriously we know as a community, these are all lads my age at the time, I seen stuff personally, stuff was known about that brother of hers well before the incident, he’s not only got off with it, another guys convicted and doing his sentence, that’s justice, that can happen to anyone, if something happens to your girlfriend and they have no evidence, I guarantee you are getting the jail for it, and if the public don’t buy it, they will find a way to sell it, back then anyway, now with online stuff, they would have figured out it was the brother by probably strange messages and stuff, restraining her like a possessive boyfriend and it wasn’t just protecting his little sister he abused her that’s reminiscent of an abusive boyfriend.
It was an horrific violent murder,Luke would have had to have walked home covered in blood yet he want spotted by anyone,then he would have had to clean every bit of blood DNA from his clothes,skin,house door and the inside of his house,c'mon people that would be impossible and Luke Mitchell is 100% innocent
Did he burn it.
@@woodywoodpecker1497 luke did say his mum and bro were burning stuff the garden that night.
Well done guys respect for speaking out on this subject matter !!!
What's the story about the girl Kara Van Nuil who luke held a knife to her throat while wearing a balaclava at cadets I believe?
Was this the knife indecent that got him thrown out of cadets?
I think you mean 'incident'. And yes, sure was.
Nonsense
@@kerrytk5768 That is a very well known Fact lovey. Aww, you don't like True stories about your Monster hey.
I stayed in Mayfield when this horrific crime happened.
Now in Dalkeith.
I am ashamed to say i thought Luke was guilty.
Had a son 13 at that time who was also at St David's School.
Talk at school, he is a weirdo he is guilty.
After watching murder in a small town, i was shocked.
My son told me to research all these talks on youtube about the case. He believes now Luke is Innocent.
Most people i chat too in the area, also believe he is Innocent.
I put a few posts on my FB about the case.
It gets shyed
Its like people are afraid to let others see their oponion has changed.
Before the Jones's moved to easthouses they stayed few doors from me.
When the kids where younger.
Jodies brother used to go fishing with my sons and husband.
We used to take pur caravans up the grannets in the summer.
I would be up for doing what ever i can to help fly fifers.
Perhaps you would be up for asking people out here in my area what they think ?
See if we can spread the word further.
Lets try and get rid of the fear of talking about this ?
He is/was guilty. Have you read the recently released transcripts?
@@KJosef24 what about the pages that yous missed out from the transcript??
Yous must be so desperate, really
@@kathleenseath5570 What page numbers are missing? If you've read the transcripts you'll realise Auld Sandra has been lying to you.
@@kathleenseath5570 Just to let you know, though she alludes to it, she was Never at the trial, not one day & so, she knows Nothing about what the jury were 'given'. She Pretends she had all the documentation from the trial & always used the words 'case papers', now she uses the words 'case files', sounds more important. LOL. She was given some papers from the defence lawyers in relation to the Reasons for each of the appeal applications outlaid & so had the Reasons outlaid from the Crown why each failed. That's it, she had Nothing else. Then the appeal she did down the track, that also failed. Great con artist, nothing more.
When you want to see the results of the endless brainwashing by a very cunning witchypoo, look in the mirror.
No YOUS are so desperate deary & so, of course you all Can't Stand It when someone posts the Truth. @@kathleenseath5570
Maybe those experienced people that know about the case Can come out and explain Why Sandra lean Never taken any action to stop the destruction of productions in the Luke Mitchell case
From what we've been told it was a police whistle-blower but who knows...
@@theflyfiferspodcast this is true the whistle blower contacted Sandra & She done nothing So they had no option but to contact Scott Forbes
@@Ron.M-yo9ht I'd like to proof of this. Surely his legal team had access to the same samples as sandra and co do now.
@@johnny_mcgee008 you would think so But Sandra lean is heading the show
Looking forward to Sandra lean coming back on the show To answer the accusations
Or even one of her spoke persons to talk about the lies
Ah cool does this mean you want to come on to counter question or offer another narrative?
I'm happy to sit an listen to an alternative.
@@theflyfiferspodcast depends what you mean As I think that Luke is s innocent But question Sandra lean and her book of misinformation I don't think that would take more than 10 minutes Not sure if that would make a good pod
Look get Sandra lean back on She can explain her 21 years involvement with the Mitchell case
She is a liar She decided to take up a course at university because she was afraid that they murder was still out there and her kids go to the school in the area
So she ops to travel miles away to study. Oh aye that does make sense
Then in her book she lied about Shane She then lied about Luke's second girlfriend She lied about knowing that there was a dedtruction of evidence happening She lied about The court transcripts
Sandra lean let's see the evidence The paper trail that you were wrongly advised by the legal team
Oh and let's not forget that Sandra lean has full autonomy on Luke Mitchell
Sandra lean could have had expert help from overseas But she will not let those who want to help see them
She even dictates to the legal team on what they can see or not see
Sandra lean should take the offer of taking a lie detector test As Scott Forbes has mentioned There is a pot of money there for lie detecting
Sandra lean you are a liar and a manipulative person you have all the traits of a psychopath In fact you should be analysed by professional profilers You are running a scam And this will be proven
@@Ron.M-yo9ht I'm new to this and have noticed lies from sandra, scott and lukes mum. It's very strange.
Don't they want luke to be released?
There is only so many books they can sell.
#freelukemitchell , there's so much I've seen on different podcasts talking about certain aspects on this case and my point is why's there so many secrets from police Scotland destroying the evidence that is needed from Luke Mitchell lawyers for his proven innocence and to have many more other things that if ya'll need to know more about this case and the fact that Luke Mitchell is innocent really go deep into this world of corruption from police Scotland and am only talking about this case but I do know a lot of other people going through the same thing free the innocent men and women because Luke Mitchell did not do this murder do you really think that a whole bunch of clever people from all ages would stick with the narrative that Luke Mitchell is innocent if we didn't know what the truth is and what a lie is and I cannot stand a liar so that is one view of many different stories about how or why we get together for a peaceful protest because this is wrong to destroy evidence and lie especially about a 14 year old girl who was murdered by someone who is still walking the streets probably.
What about some truth from Sandra
sandra is totally Incapable of telling Any truth.
Proud of you all doing this 👍. Keep up with the podcasts brilliant for Luke. Free Luke Mitchell 👍
💯👍
They're nothing but a pair of Very practised Con Artists who say Whatever because they have books of BS to sell ya. Her former profession was that of a Hypnotist, he was formerly an Armed robber. They hooked up after he had tried to sell a BS story to the press for 50,000 pounds but the friend was seen on CCTV with No scratches on his face & had a solid alibi. They've been partners in hoodwinking the public for Money ever since. When that totally biased Ch 5 documentary went to air, Scotty boy had his part to play, of course. The friend had died in the meantime so he repeated that Lie & added an extra lie & said the guy had a knife. LOL. Scotty boy has a real thing for knives & tells many stories about young guys & finding knives all around town right at that time. For many of his videos he is in a room in his flat, front & centre on the wall is his phallic symbol. Guess what it is.
Some other countries like the U.S., have the full transcripts of court testimony & all evidence available to the public when the trial is over. Not Scotland. Got it?
Update - Some transcripts from the trial have been released. sandra is now hiding under her bed with 20 jars, many near full to the brim already. LMAO. Forbes is doing the same, only bigger jars.
Luke Mitchell went before a court of Law with 20 Chapters of evidence against him, which is a Lot for a sole defendant. The High Court Judge & Jurors - Saw & Heard that evidence & found him Guilty, Beyond A Reasonable Doubt. And after only 5 hours adjudicating due to such a Strong case. The general public know Nothing of that Actual evidence.
The biggest & longest trial in Scottish history, 42 days.
He has had all the appeals he will Ever get & the Innocence Project rejected his application due to the Overwhelming evidence that showed Exactly what he did to this poor girl.
He was also convicted that same day for being a long term drug dealer. He sold his drugs to fellow School kids, no matter who they were or how old they were. He carried his skunting knife daily to cut his hash. The knife that Disappeared, with The jacket And his balaclava.
His behaviours in totality were so sociopathic Before this murder, the kids called him the savage.
His own Brother testified Against him & he nor their father have had Anything to do with him since the trial Nor have they spoken to that so-called mother since. They sure as hell have Nothing to do with this Shameful campaign, which is nothing but a nefarious marketing ploy to sell their books about Nothing & getting away with it Still because they know damn well that the public are totally in the dark about the Facts presented at Trial. Only the naive & the ignorant fall for it all.
His highly sadistic Premeditated crime was so heinous & wicked it's likely that he'll Never get out.
Sandra Lean & now Scott Forbes wrote books of BS to line their Own pockets & all the plotted media hoo ha for over 3 years on utube videos has some people hypnotised because that's the Whole Aim. Of Course they blame the cops, that's how Both lowly Con Artists rake in the hard-done-by members of society in particular.
He tried to stage the scene as if a maniacal fiend had come across Jodi & somehow got her over & through that broken section of the stone wall & went berserk with a knife, yet she never made a sound. It's a Fact that most of the cuts were After death. He cajoled her with pot to Their place in the woods & knocked her out, had to, he was a simpy punk, the severe contusion on her brain told That story. The witness noticed the bulge in a pocket of the jacket. That had to be something substantial in the pocket to stand out in a jacket that was big & bulky for that twerp.
Lean nor now Forbes, have Ever spoke about the contusion on Jodi's brain & it was substantial. They don't want Anyone to know that Jodi was knocked out cold. The bruising & abrasions were all to her head, neck & face areas Only, being punched & kicked when she was on the Ground. Their various BS stories saying that she was 'fighting for her life' are Not True.
He thought he was smarter than the cops & told his mother that after the initial police questioning that night. She stated that Publicly in her interview with James English. He was Not & neither was She. She who worked hard to cover it all up.
The crown put forth that he went back. In total he couldn't account for 3 hours. The police didn't know what time Jodi was attacked or died when speaking to him that night yet his false alibi was for that exact time frame of her death. What a Very telling Coincidence. Luke was Not home in that time frame of 5 to 5.30 & so, did not know if his brother was or not. Luke had left to meet Jodi before his brother got home from work. They reeled that poor lad into it the Next Day when the mother had sobered up. Their statements changed every time the cops went back to tell them info they found out, didn't match. They changed the alibi 3 times within the 1st week. Lean & Forbes have Never told that Fact.
Jodi's grandmother, her sister & boyfriend realised they'd repeated to the cops what Luke had Told Them about the actions of the dog & so they amended their statement about that detail, that was All. Now I see that Lean has a big banner & posters as her next hoodwinking ploy, "MIA FOUND HER". The dog did Not climb over & through the V in the wall & so into the woods, ONLY Luke DID. It was proven that his torch did Not have the scope to have seen the body which was behind a big log & amongst bushes - on that pitch dark, rainy, starless night, At All.
Lean always uses the wording of 'case papers' to Pretend that she had all the documents & all the statements from the trial, she does Not & Never has. She had paperwork from his defence lawyer for the appeal process from way back at that time, Nothing else.
Over 40 police & seasoned investigators worked this case very carefully for a Long time.
The police did an Excellent job to put that scumbag psychopathic child killer Exactly where he needs to be.
@@bethryan9077you’re a crank 😂
You’ve been copying and pasting the same comment for years
@@bethryan9077Boring Beth 😴 move along with your lies!
People who have information are scared to be known, I just wish they would come forward. The jury were not given all of the evidence so you would think that at least one of them would speak out. The justice system is a joke and it's scary 😦
Just out of curiosity what evidence were they not given?
@@ourwilliam2405 hundreds
@@dadssongsfraser4593 oK, Can you tell me just some of them? Serious question by the way, Can you?
omg & you meany Leany cult members expect the jury believe her never ending Garbage just because you do. LOL. Doh. Just to let you know, though she alludes to it, she was Never at the trial, not one day & so, she knows Nothing about what they were 'given'. She Pretends she had all the documentation from the trial & always used the words 'case papers', now she uses the words 'case files', sounds more important. LOL. She was given some papers from the defence lawyers in relation to the Reasons for each of the appeal applications outlaid & so had the Reasons outlaid from the Crown why each failed. That's it, she had Nothing else. Then the appeal she did, that also failed. Great con artist, nothing more.
@bethryan .
If you mean she is Sandra ?
She never claimed to be at the trial 1 day she had a business to run .
Beth, why don't you go on this show and put your side across? These guys will treat you with most utter respect and fairness .
You can tell us what happened at trial ?
Seems you must have been there. 🙃👍
Well done guys
I’ll kindly answer you here Val since Forbes had me blocked on Toals podcast
Shane names the porn site he used before looking at car websites
It’s in black and white Val. Shane’s words I can tell you the name of it if you want
@@ourwilliam2405he agrees to the name of a site he previously used - your point is? Also if you can explain how a 14 year old can batter, murder, mutilate, clean up all his dna but leave others there all within an hour that would be great! I’ve told you before I’m not interested in anything you have to say while hiding behind a false name. Guessing you’ve still not made any mates so your still trolling sites to engage in conversations with people 🤣
@@valyoung4104 Not what he previously used, the one he was using when he was home alone, when luke wasnt in the house, Shane was alone, no Luke or Corrine, all alone,
You all believed he wasnt watching porn, I told you years ago that it would come out, and its slowly coming out now, the truth is coming,
@@ourwilliam2405 yes the truth is coming. Do you still believe a 14 year old battered, murdered, mutilated and cleaned up all his dna but left others there all within 50 mins?
@@valyoung4104 Except he didnt clean up his DNA though, Those markers, non incriminating markers were there,
Its all coming out now, isnt it?
Thank you
Facts I think what you said about the opposition who were not a suspect when they are more likely to be responsible for whatever triggered this off .
Well Done Everyone
I would Like to see them on more regular.
Be good for the supporters to be able to ask questions they need answers too.
There isn't anything these guys don't know about the case.
We need to keep spreading the word !
Luke Mitchell was before a court of Law with 20 Chapters of evidence against him, which is a Lot for one defendant. The High Court Judge & Jurors - Saw & Heard that evidence & found him Guilty, Beyond A Reasonable Doubt. He has had all the appeals he will Ever get & the Innocence Project rejected his application due to the Overwhelming evidence that showed Exactly what he did to this poor girl Plus his previous degenerate & violent behaviours. His own Brother testified Against him & he nor their father have had Anything to do with Luke since the trial Nor that so-called mother. They sure as hell have Nothing to do with this Shameful campaign, that's all just a white-wash for Money.
His highly sadistic Premeditated crime was so heinous & wicked it's likely that he'll Never get out.
Sandra Lean & now Scott Forbes wrote books of BS to line their Own pockets & all the media hoo ha for over 3 years on utube videos has some people hypnotised because that's the Whole Aim. Yep they blame the cops that's how Both Con Artists rake in the hard-done-by members of society in particular.
Over 40 police & seasoned investigators worked this case for a Long time & the cops did a Great job by putting that lowlife child ki##er Exactly where he needs to be.
@@bethryan9077 would you be willing to on a podcast with the fly Fifers ?
That's what they are asking
@@kathleenseath5570 Hell to the no, I wouldn't be pleasant to sandra's brainwashed cult members for very long. And that would also mean I'd be straining at the bit around a sadistic child killer's fan club. Thanks anyway.
Kathleen this Beth Ryan character is a troll , copy and pastes the same nonsense on every Luke Mitchell video
@@JGI43 Yeah everyone who isn't a numpty beast lover is a troll. Aren't you just Pathetic indeed. Oh deary me, someone is posting the True Facts, shock, horror, spit in your eye Truth. LMAO.
I was at the gathering near the High Court in April in Edinburgh this year, great to see local people from Midlothian and beyond fighting for Luke and Jodi's justice.
that mic's a bit cloudy
I never said she had them all.
She has 80 percent.
The fact is, she has them !
You know that we know, it's all going to come out sooner rather than later..
We are dignified, and do not wish to participate in mud flinging.
I would watch your side of your story if you where to accept your invitation on their show ?
Just the fact you will not do this speaks volumes !!
She had 99 percent of Zero, in Fact. Listen up, there is absolutely No legal avenues to pursue, None, Nunka, Zilch.
@@bethryan9077 what about the new evidence??
@@johnny_mcgee008there is no new evidence
Have you noticed that it’s never mentioned?
Can you picture what Sandra Lean and Scott C Forbes has been through since they began this journey
They don't need to do it. LM could get a real lawyer like everyone else does - if he can find one.
That's actually a really good point.
Why do highly qualified legal experts ignore a particular case.
Probably because they believe he is guilty, looking at the evidence.
But then you get the people who watch a documentary, it becomes an obsession.
@@woodywoodpecker1497 Aye, trial by UA-cam by people that can't read the original court verdict or appeal papers.
@@woodywoodpecker1497 nah your so up your own ass you cannot see the forest for the tree's foolosophy don't cut it yo'h !!!
@@KJosef24 another foolosophy muppet !!! Check Ya'h self esteem and your own ignorance is bliss for someone like you !!!
I wish decibel levels of UA-cam uploads were more consistent, one video is too loud, another video is too quiet, this is quiet.
It's loud as on my phone,tablet, TV is always a problem due to the poor speakers on the tv
Violent individual, Easton, was incessantly battering students, early 90s, entering Potterrow discotheque.......landing uppercuts on them.......he walked in + out the Edinburgh court 16 ×, the sixteenth time the police shouted + yelled at the judge, "That's ridiculous!!" "That should be two years at least!" probably more aggressive than that.......Easton (first name) was battering students, the judge was saying "You're acquitted" every single time he appeared......then my Serbian friend, Zoran, hit someone once, & was immediately given six months jail......while Zoran was in jail, the guy he hit once was found guilty of murder, police refused to revise Zoran's sentence in light of that......Zoran had no previous, he'd got a musicology degree in Paris & had been a DJ in Serbia, & then decided to study Journalism in Edinburgh University.......& in April 1974, I was being invited into a secret society type thing.....guaranteeing the judge will do nothing if I stab or batter someone, they'll put it thru as a suicide if I kill someone.......they have a thing of divide + rule, make coloureds feel bias in the courts, stuff like that.
If I may say, something I noticed on your recent podcasts is that you have fallen into the trap of guilters being trolls and the like ,
People get blocked from their pages If they have a different opinion, then it becomes an echo chamber of truthers, no debate at all.
So if people don’t believe he is innocent does that mean they are trolls ?
You wonder why people won’t speak out from the other side ? Who is the other side ? It’s not the Jones,
The case is Mitchell V The Crown
You want people to comment, right ?
Have you seen the infighting between the groups, the fall outs ? The bitching?
The transcripts are slowly coming out, and they’re different from Sandra’s story
Let’s see what happens
Our William your a regular with comments, would you like to come on sit and give a version? I'll as before happily facilitate you to do so. Myself I see trolls as those who name call or take pops at an individuals person or the way they look etc. Not comments. Everyone is allowed an opinion. I've time in 2 weeks if you want to voice your side of the story.
James.
@@theflyfiferspodcast Thanks for answering, and thanks for the invite, I’m quite happy to comment in the sections for the moment.
But I do appreciate your invitation
Yeah let's see. Do you think Sandra, a very intelligent person would fight so hard. He's innocent 🙄
@@dadssongsfraser4593 People can get it wrong,
Going by the latest news that’s what it looks like
Yeah we know who got it wrong@@ourwilliam2405
Big mistake to assume he had to walk home covered in blood, he probably planned it had change of clothes gloves etc left at the scene.What happened to his PARKA? His brother initially said he was in the house preparing dinner,changed his statement and said luke wasnt in the house. Family of liars.
In his defence most of the witness statements were changed.
@@johnny_mcgee008 Stop spreading more & more Lies. Oh that's right, lying Leany & feral Forbes must have forgotten to mention that the Mitchells changed their story 3 times in one week, every time the coppers went back to tell them, Caught Out Lying ya Scumbags.
Very strange that none of the panel of Luke Mitchell supporters have got angry because other supporters called SL a lier SL lied about the hash that LM had Also lied about the other girlfriend Also lied about the court transcripts in fact her recent reply is even more ridiculous She says that she has no idea how others got hold of them
In this statement It would indicate That she thinks she is the only one entitled to have any information about Luke
It also now appears that she is the actual legal team
Totally unbelievable She is a con woman
Evening !
Also there was another girl who was having a sleepover at Luke's dad's house and luke supposedly pulled a blade to her neck and demanded a kiss?
are these the admins who banned other admins because they asked questions/ shared the trial transcipts that have shown sl lies?
Are you going to the Salters Inn on the 9th Basil to say hello to Auld Sandra? And buy her a pint (of wine).
😂😂 oh basil 😅
Good to know you're watching, a great bunch of people doing a fab job
@@shepherdLoki Should be a good night at Salters on the 9th of never.
@@injusticescotlandeverywher3985 lies being exposed
luke mitchell is defo guilty jodi jones is who they should care about
Fair enough we do care about Jodi Jones definitely, on the other hand you obviously haven't done your homework before talking on it just saying man
Luke Mitchell is innocent been watch it for a while,not a shred of evidence, no DNA biggest miscarriage of justice ever in Scotland
@@ALitScottyB323 Luke Mitchell went before a court of Law with 20 Chapters of evidence against him, which is a Lot for a sole defendant. The High Court Judge & Jurors - Saw & Heard that evidence & found him Guilty, Beyond A Reasonable Doubt. And after only 5 hours adjudicating due to such a Strong case. The general public know Nothing of that Actual evidence. The biggest & longest trial in Scottish history, 42 days. He has had all the appeals he will Ever get & the Innocence Project rejected his application due to the Overwhelming evidence that showed Exactly what he did to this poor girl. He was also convicted that same day for being a long term drug dealer. He sold his drugs to fellow School kids, no matter who they were or how old they were. He carried his skunting knife daily to cut his hash. The knife that Disappeared, with The jacket And his balaclava. His behaviours in totality were so sociopathic Before this murder, the kids called him the savage. His own Brother testified Against him & he nor their father have had Anything to do with him since the trial Nor have they spoken to that so-called mother since. They sure as hell have Nothing to do with this Shameful campaign, which is nothing but a nefarious marketing ploy for Lean & Forbes to sell their books about Nothing & getting away with it Still because they know damn well that the public are totally in the dark about the Facts presented at Trial. Only the naive & the ignorant fall for it all. His highly sadistic Premeditated crime was so heinous & wicked it's likely that he'll Never get out. Sandra Lean & now Scott Forbes wrote books of BS to line their Own pockets & all the plotted media hoo ha for over 3 years on utube videos has some people hypnotised because that's the Whole Aim. Of Course they blame the cops, that's how Both lowly Con Artists rake in the hard-done-by members of society in particular. He tried to stage the scene as if a maniacal fiend had come across Jodi & somehow got her over & through that broken section of the stone wall & went berserk with a knife, yet she never made a sound. It's a Fact that most of the cuts were After death. He cajoled her with pot to Their place in the woods & knocked her out, had to, he was a simpy punk, the severe contusion on her brain told That story. He premeditated everything he did. The witness noticed the bulge in a pocket of the jacket. That had to be something substantial in the pocket to stand out in a jacket that was big & bulky for that twerp. Lean nor now Forbes, have Ever spoke about the contusion on Jodi's brain & it was substantial. They don't want Anyone to know that Jodi was knocked out cold. The bruising & abrasions were all to her head, neck & face areas Only, being punched & kicked when she was on the Ground. Their various BS stories saying that she was 'fighting for her life' are Not True. He thought he was smarter than the cops & told his mother that after the initial police questioning that night. She stated that Publicly in her interview with James English. He was Not & neither was She. She who worked hard to cover it all up. The crown put forth that he went back. In total he couldn't account for 3 hours. The police didn't know what time Jodi was attacked or died when speaking to him that night yet his false alibi was for that exact time frame of her death. What a Very telling Coincidence. Luke was Not home in that time frame of 5 to 5.30 & so, did not know if his brother was or not. Luke had left to meet Jodi before his brother got home from work. They reeled that poor lad into it the Next Day when the mother had sobered up. Their statements changed every time the cops went back to tell them info they found out, didn't match. They changed the alibi 3 times within the 1st week. Lean & Forbes have Never told that Fact. Jodi's grandmother, her sister & boyfriend realised they'd repeated to the cops what Luke had Told Them about the actions of the dog & so they amended their statement about that detail, that was All. Now I see that Lean has a big banner & posters as her next hoodwinking ploy, "MIA FOUND HER". The dog did Not climb over & through the V in the wall & so into the woods, ONLY Luke DID. It was proven that his torch did Not have the scope to have seen the body which was behind a big log & amongst bushes - on that pitch dark, rainy, starless night, At All. Lean always uses the wording of 'case papers' to Pretend that she had all the documents & all the statements from the trial, she does Not & Never has. She had paperwork from his defence lawyer for the appeal process from way back at that time, Nothing else. Over 40 police & seasoned investigators worked this case very carefully for a Long time. The police did an Excellent job to put that scumbag psychopathic child killer Exactly where he needs to be.
There you go, some Homework for You.
It is totally unfair to call people trolls because they disagree with Sandra lean
Luke Mitchell is innocent
I don't think anyone gets called a troll when they voice their opinion. I think it's when people with fake accounts or accounts with users, as the name, etc, hurl abusive comments. I think that's acceptable for the troll label. Certainly anytime James mentions a troll I know that's what he thinks. He can't speak for anyone else. 😉🛼🛼♥️
@@theflyfiferspodcast 👍
These 3 hardly know anything about this case.
On you go then speak up and you tell us everything...😂 X
It wasn't about knowledge. More about chat an why the support sandra.
I learned from them
@@shepherdLoki Did you learn who Dobbie was?
@@ourwilliam2405all facts point to Joseph
Volume very low on this can't really hear the girls speak
What are you watching it on???
@@theflyfiferspodcast Why are you deleting my replies over & over again? I will remind you that UA-cam has strict rules & regulations about the comment section, which is a Public forum. I am the public. If you continue with your underhanded practices I will report your channel to admin. BTW - then there's something called Freedom of Speech. How many other people's posts are you deleting also? Listen up, everyone can See the number count of replies & See how many are Missing. I am logging what you have done & have now made a copy of this direct message to you.
Im still on the fence about it like I've no doubt about police corruption hell look at the ice cream war in Glasgow during the 80s and one of those dudes is still advocating lukes innocence. But on the other hand, when it comes out, he has another appeal rejected because he is a "sexual threat" to women I find it hard to believe he never done it
How convienant