Jodi Jones and Luke Mitchell
Вставка
- Опубліковано 5 лют 2025
- On June 30th, 2004, Jodi Jones returned home to find out she was no longer grounded for a small argument she had with her mother, Judith, over her cannabis use. She informed her mother, in that case, that she was going to see her boyfriend Luke Mitchell in the next town over. Jodi was never seen alive by her family again.
Credits:
Primary Audio recorded by JS
Research by JS
Scripting by Matt K
Background Audio courtesy of Epidemic Sound (epidemicsound.com)
Sponsors
Huge thanks to Podcorn for sponsoring this episode. Explore sponsorship opportunities and start monetizing your podcast by signing up here: podcorn.com/po...
And to Fruit of the Bean Coffee, excellent coffee and excellent people. Check out their range here at: www.fruitofthebean.com
Sources:
A truly evil murder - you will rightly be regarded as wicked; Lucy Bannerman finds how a teenage love of music and rebellion ended with a walk to a horrific death, The Herald online, 22 Jan 2005, anonymous
Timeline [Jodi Jones Murder Case], The Herald, 23 Jan 2005, anonymous
Jodi's family hit back over killers claims of innocence, The Express, G Christison, May 13 2012
Teenage boy accused of murder joked about killing, court told, The Guardian, S Shukor, 26 Nov 2004
www.scotsman.co... - now dead link to a history of Luke Mitchell’s childhood
Luke Mitchell: I would rather stay in jail than admit my guilt for murder of Jodi Jones, The Scotsman, 16 September 2018, The Newsroom
Jodi 'look-alike' gives evidence , BBC Online, 30 Dec 2004
miscarriageofju... - transcript of Luke Mitchell’s interview with Sky News in 2005
Threat of legal action as Luke Mitchell excluded 'for safety reasons': [2 Edition] Kerr, John. Evening Times; Glasgow (UK) [Glasgow (UK)]20 Aug 2003: 5.
'Murdered Jodi Jones' mum hits out at heartless thieves who stole special birthday bear from her grave', J Hamilton, The Daily Record, 13 Jul 2018
Jodi murder: boyfriend's lawyer urges probe into police 'leak': [3 Edition] Johnston, Jenifer. Sunday Herald; Glasgow (UK) [Glasgow (UK)]30 Nov 2003: 6.
Detectives in Jodi murder inquiry enlist help of the FBI: [2 Edition] Duncan, Raymond. The Herald; Glasgow (UK) [Glasgow (UK)]09 Jan 2004: 9.
'Police wrecked my son's life after Jodi died': [CITY FINAL Edition] King, Diane. Evening News; Edinburgh (UK) [Edinburgh (UK)]06 Mar 2004: 13.
THE JODI JONES TRIAL: A silent witness: [FIRST Edition] Sunday Mail; Glasgow (UK) [Glasgow (UK)]14 Nov 2004: 24.
THE JODI JONES TRIAL: The finest day I ever had was when tomorrow never came ; -Lines written on an empty knife pouch found in Luke Mitchell'sbedroom: [FIRST Edition] Sunday Mail; Glasgow (UK) [Glasgow (UK)]19 Dec 2004: 19.
He didn't kill Jodi ; Luke Mitchell's mother denies that she lied to protect her son McLean, Grace. Daily Mail; London (UK) [London (UK)]15 Jan 2005: 11.
Mitchell trial hears of 'suspect', BBC Online, 13 Feb 2008
miscarriageofju... - discussion around Luke Mitchell’s lie-detector test
• Luke Mitchell Passing ... - footage of Luke Mitchell’s lie-detector test
'Mother’s frantic calls when Jodi did not come home' The Times, A Scotland Correspondent, Nov 27 2004
'Jodi's Killer is being shielded by someone, says mother', A Cramb, Telegraph, 16 Jul 2003
Right of Reply: Whilst Luke Mitchell has been convicted of the murder of Jodi Jones beyond all reasonable doubt by a jury of his peers, we are aware that there have been significant campaigns against his conviction, including by MOJO and Sandra Lean. At Skinwalker, we do not have access to spokespeople from any of these campaigns and our initial emails received no reply. Should any party wish to have the right to reply, we would happily do a follow-up episode or discussion podcast with any points of interest, or probative evidence, should it be provided. Our email address is: skinwalkertruecrime[at]gmail.com
He’s 1000% innocent. Would say her brother in law and brother more of a suspect than Luke.
Luke Mitchell was before a court of Law with 20 Chapters of evidence against him, which is a Lot for one defendant. The High Court Judge & Jurors - Saw & Heard that evidence & found him Guilty, Beyond A Reasonable Doubt. He has had all the appeals he will Ever get & the Innocence Project rejected his application due to the Overwhelming evidence that showed Exactly what he did to this poor girl Plus his previous degenerate & violent behaviours. His own Brother testified Against him & he nor their father have had Anything to do with Luke since the trial Nor that so-called mother. They sure as hell have Nothing to do with this Shameful campaign which is all just a white-wash for Money.
His highly sadistic Premeditated crime was so heinous & wicked it's likely that he'll Never get out.
Sandra Lean & now Scott Forbes wrote books of BS to line their Own pockets & all the media hoo ha for over 3 years on utube videos has some people hypnotised because that's the Whole Aim. Yep, of course they blame the cops, that's how Both Con Artists rake in the hard-done-by members of society in particular.
Over 40 police & seasoned investigators worked this case for a Long time & the cops did a Great job by putting that scumbag child killer Exactly where he needs to be.
Was no forensic evidence this biggest miscarriage justice Scotland has ever seen. Wether guilty or not this case would been thrown out in any other country. To release identity of a child before even being named suspect was negligent. I used to believe he was guilty but isn’t until you look at real court documents and forensics you paint picture of very forensic killing with very lengthy prolonged attack after death. Part crime scene looked staged she had defensive wounds and if we believe luke committed this crime he did so while two people known to Jodi ran a crap bike up path that was scene at the V by the one actual credible witness in this case. The bike was up against it with no one around. The jury was too close to this case was trial by media and cover up by her own blood line. More than 1 person was involved in this crime because if not then one person had to inflict all of those wounds head back to his home leave not trace any blood be seen by absolutely no one covered in blood shower get back out for 5.37 to be seen on phone to her stepdad. Then they don’t seem worried but it’s him that’s meant to be makes no sense. To him she simply didn’t show up. He was seen at 5.37,5.40,5.47,5.55 with a friend meets a 2nd one at 6.30 has alibi for rest of the night where was traces blood he would had to wash off head off he had 3 minutes to do this it’s not possible. I’d love for the brother and cousins/friends seen on path at time of her death do lie detector test. Only lay had 5 days to cover up murder. Brother beat her and yet never questioned as everytime tried he was put into hospital. Huge cover up that girl deserves justice.
@@staceyyoungson9189 there was quite a lot of forensic evidence to put him away
@@ourwilliam2405 according to court documents available to us it was 3 elements he was convicted on. Dna and forensics was not one of them. They were in intimate relationship it was agreed there would be dna on items of his and vice versa. He got convicted due to alibi, a certain someone’s perfect sighting of wrong people and because he found the body. Nobody else’s stories changed and he was not the one following her. He also passed a lie detector not because he practised his mum did too. I have spent a lot time on this case I used to believe his guilt. Now I know who murderer is and so does most the population.
Everyone else statements changed sorry
No evidence whatsoever so how on earth is he still in prison?! Hands tied behind her back with her own trousers and she put up a good fight. He’s a skinny 14yr old kid for goodness sake! No marks or scratches or DNA at all. How on earth have they got away with doing this with no evidence. Plays on my mind terribly. I hate injustices. I only hope this poor man gets his retrial as he’s already lost so much of his life and his poor mother has already lost so much of her child.
Where do you get the idea there was no evidence whatsoever? That is ludicrous to say that. 20 chapters in Fact which is a lot for one person. The longest trial In Scottish history for a sole defendant, 42 days. Jodi did Not put up Any fight. He knocked her out with a blunt weapon. He hit her so hard it produced a contusion on the brain. He was near 15 & a very cunning & violent drug dealer who ran around the street til all hours doing whatever he liked. He was also convicted of drug supply & carrying knives in public. His house was known as the local drug den & the brothel. He premeditated this sadistic murder & was well prepared. He was seen with Jodi at the east end of the path where they would meet when going to his house & he was seen by himself by 2 witnesses at the west end by himself 50 minutes later & by others walking down the road. His brother testified that he wasn't home & that Corrine coerced him into giving Luke an alibi before, as she did. He couldn't explain where his jacket or knives disappeared to that he was known to have. The high court judge & jurors heard & saw all the evidence against him, you only believe someone who wrote a book for profit. Corrine tried very hard to cover up all he did. When they thought he got away with everything she celebrated by taking him to a tattoo parlour with a fake ID & telling the owners that he was over 18. She lied in court about that as well. The police searched the house again unannounced in April 2004 & located the knife pouch for the 4" skunting knife that had disappeared, he had written Jodi's initials & her date of birth & death & a verse of a Nirvana song. Of course he added 666. That was his Trophy. Only the killer would write all that on a Knife Pouch.
@@bethryan9077 Last year I open my upper kitchen cupboard and a small box of pasta fell out and whacked me on the head leaving a cut about 15mm, are you aware of how much blood would flow from a head wound so small? I do as I had to clean up the mess on my head, face, ear neck and shoulder and not to mention my sweatshirt!,worktop and cupboard doors! I can imagine how much blood the real killer would have been covered in and you wouldn't have cleaned that up or walked the street without anyone noticing this or finding any evidence of this on his person or clothing.
I know dozens of people that had tattoos before they were of legal age and were taken by their mother or father to get it done. Not one of them has committed a murder, one of them is now a cop. Many of them have lyrics from songs tattooed onto their parts
Everyone knows that a lot of cannabis users have a knife they keep to cut pieces off to smoke.
I have also witnessed a friend being stabbed with a blade no longer than 4 inches and it wouldn't have made the mess of Jodi as described in court, so for you to allude to that missing knife being a possible murder weapon is totally salacious and duplicitous, just like the many media reports on this case.
Too many fact points to his innocence, the simplest one is the phone call to the time clock proves he was at home.
@@maldaley235I have 7 replies in a row from you at 2 different sites. It is Very clear that you are stalking me & duly Noted. I am Not interested in your never ending Garbage. There's something seriously Wrong with you, I suggest you go seek Therapy.
(37.00) - There's no evidence Luke Mitchell was 'extremely interested' in rock star Marilyn Manson beyond normal passing teenage infatuation with popular music genres.
It was made up by the Police. Same as the Black Dahlia stuff, no evidence of him ever viewing or searching that either. They made it up.
@@Sunburst75 That's a blatant lie & is in the crown documents that he bought & viewed 2 days after the murder, Marilon Mansun's DVD The Golden Age of the Grotesque, images of naked women tied together & subjected to a form of abduction. His friends testified that he was obsessed with the Black Dahlia murder & looked up to MMansun. I have read the medical examiner's summary, Luke Mitchell absolutely carried out His version of the Dahlia murder. Your time is up for lying so much about this case, lots of documents are available to the public
Luke needs a totally independent retrial ie away from Scotland altogether take him down to the old bailey in London where there is no Scottish influence and much more fairer retrial.
Maybe that could be arranged surely he has that right.
He was appealing to european courts then brexit.......
You need to research this case yourself, he is where he needs to stay.
. People need to research for themselves instead of just believing a Con Artist woman who wrote a book for profit.
Luke Mitchell was before a court of Law with 20 Chapters of evidence against him, which is a Lot for one defendant. The High Court Judge & Jurors - Saw & Heard that evidence & found him Guilty, Beyond A Reasonable Doubt. He has had all the appeals he will Ever get & the Innocence Project rejected his application due to the Overwhelming evidence that showed Exactly what he did to this poor girl Plus his previous degenerate & violent behaviours. His own Brother testified Against him & he nor their father have had Anything to do with Luke since the trial Nor that so-called mother. They sure as hell have Nothing to do with this Shameful campaign which is all just a white-wash for Money.
His highly sadistic Premeditated crime was so heinous & wicked it's likely that he'll Never get out.
Sandra Lean & now Scott Forbes wrote books of BS to line their Own pockets & all the media hoo ha for over 3 years on utube videos has some people hypnotised because that's the Whole Aim. Yep, of course they blame the cops, that's how Both Con Artists rake in the hard-done-by members of society in particular.
Over 40 police & seasoned investigators worked this case for a Long time & the cops did a Great job by putting that scumbag child killer Exactly where he needs to be.
@@bethryan9077 Bullshit the killer is still smoking his weed
The murderer is still out there somewhere Luke Mitchell is innocent 100%
Its strange that he hasnt killed again in the same way
Rubbish
@@ourwilliam2405 Yeah, its remarkable, vanished into thin air
@@markvega5036 Vaniished into a jail cell
@@ourwilliam2405 Did Mia find any more bodies
I have posted Facts about this case, not fiction from a certain book. See my long reply to John Benson
@@Sunburst75 But sandra, as long as You are. lol
@@Sunburst75 hi sandra go get a job you need one lol
@@Sunburst75 ok sandra
Luke Mitchell was before a court of Law with 20 Chapters of evidence against him, which is a Lot for one defendant. The High Court Judge & Jurors - Saw & Heard that evidence & found him Guilty, Beyond A Reasonable Doubt. He has had all the appeals he will Ever get & the Innocence Project rejected his application due to the Overwhelming evidence that showed Exactly what he did to this poor girl Plus his previous degenerate & violent behaviours. His own Brother testified Against him & he nor their father have had Anything to do with Luke since the trial Nor that so-called mother. They sure as hell have Nothing to do with this Shameful campaign which is all just a white-wash for Money.
His highly sadistic Premeditated crime was so heinous & wicked it's likely that he'll Never get out.
Sandra Lean & now Scott Forbes wrote books of BS to line their Own pockets & all the media hoo ha for over 3 years on utube videos has some people hypnotised because that's the Whole Aim. Yep, of course they blame the cops, that's how Both Con Artists rake in the hard-done-by members of society in particular.
Over 40 police & seasoned investigators worked this case for a Long time & the cops did a Great job by putting that scumbag child killer Exactly where he needs to be.
How many times have you copy pasted this inane comment?
@@dapperdanman7930 How many times do you dribble each day?
@@bethryan9077 Depends how often I pee
You are full of it Beth Ryan, u know as much as us all that poor lad luke mitchell certainly didn't do that to poor jody Jones, u should be ashamed of yourself for that comment that comment
@@johncolt Go get your momma to get your toys out, True crime is way too much for your highly Immature brain. Lying Leany did a good job on you suckers, it's You who should be ashamed.
This is heartbreaking, no motive, no evidence, police stitched him up!! Jodie can't RIP till real murderer is in jail
Free luke. I remember how vilified in the press he was and it takes 20 years for it to come out that it's all bs. Who's been covering this up is what I'd like to know and why ??!!
No a cover up mate flawed investigation with the coppers they believed he was the perpetrator and didn't look elsewhere and the forensic team had their eyes painted on.not one shred of evidence against the lad the circumstantial evidence was weak and the prosecution and judge misled the jury by taking the circumstantial evidence and not using by law any corroborated evidence as is needed in scottish law to get a conviction they never took his alibi from his mum and bro cause it didn't fit their narrative I believe jodi jones mum brother and gran should be made to take a lie detector test cause I think they know something
@Terese Bowen you can say whatever you like the boy was convicted without a shred of evidence no dna no motive nada the police assumed his guilt from the off as did his defence team and didn't even try to clear him he and his mum passed a lie detector test one in a million chance they could both pass but they did the scene was contaminated by the jones family namely the gran need I go on keep listening to the corrupt police and media sounds like they are doing a grand job for you fool
@Terese Bowen maybe you are old and think you know the law well circumstantial evidence is not the best as Scots law says you need verifiable and corroborating evidence at least two parts to secure a full and valid conviction name the two that weren't circumstantial and corroborated by proof or dna or fibres or scratches or blood there was none so as I says before get the jones to take lie detector test and you will find who it was or which family member it was oryty bye now
So someone writes a book to make money & suddenly the high court judge & jurors were cardboard cut-outs for 42 days inside a building. lol
@@johnbenson7113 You weren't even in the court & it's very obvious you know nothing about this crime.
King bear. Where did you get this information from?? Im new to the case but you seem to have inside information. Just wondering if you have anything to back these ludicrous claims. There is no evidence
My mum was jodis best friend
The circumstancial evidence luke was overwhelming.im not gonna list it go have a look at all the info about it on google.
@@Fallisover_ must have been horrific for her losing her friend so young.
@@neondemon7617 yeah it was she was her best friend, she also still speaks to jodis mum Judy when she sees her
@@Fallisover_ big hugs to your mum.i used to stay in dalkeith.i remember the case very well.poor jodi and her family.so so sad for them.
I hope Luke gets out soon because if you looked at facts and evidence. Luke wasn't even there! Someone framed that poor guy and its absolutely disgusting.
Someone has in the last few years admitted to this murder, to a police officer but has anything been done about it? No.
I used to think Luke done this until I read and watched documentaries about this. He is innocent.
someone admitted to th murder to a police officer aye? ha, sandra send you?
"I hope Luke gets out soon because if you looked at facts and evidence. "
if you value facts and evidence as we all should, then youd want evidence to accompanie the claim that there was a confession yes?
if this was case then it would be reported logged and able to be proven. sandra lean hass never ben able to show that there was a confesion because it never happend. she relies on there being doubt on the conviction to have any relevance as a criminologist as this is her pet case
Shows you how much you know Brian. I don't know Sandra and I'm also not from the area. I was one of the ones who strongly believed aw goth, he done it.
Completely different frame of mind now after hearing things and not just from UA-cam.
So unless you know any better, keep your opinion to yourself.
@@ashleighcraig5295 like everyone who wasnt at trial yes its just my opinion, but it formed on speaking to people from the area including working with his brother who doesnt suppotr his claim of innocence and taking critical look at the work of miscarriage of justice campaigners for years, many of who have no interest in people they say they represnt but only on thier own carreer
sandra is only person whos ever made this claim that someone else admitted to murder and has produced no info about who, when, where this was said, or any evidence to support
it madness to repeat that claim until there is any supporting info if it even exists (I doubt) dont you agree? this is how misinformation is spread
@@Sunburst75 wait a minute. So because no one else has been murdered it’s Defos Mitchell that done it 😂 so you telling me if one of Jodies family had done this to her for reasons unknown they would have struck again? That’s just a bullshit view mate be honest
@@ashleighcraig5295 haha. Keep your opinion to yourself while l spout my opinion on UA-cam.. funny
I object to your podcast as you are telling untruths about Luke Mitchell
So is your other pods untruthful as well
This is no acceptable
Luke Mitchell was before a court of Law with 20 Chapters of evidence against him, which is a Lot for one defendant. The High Court Judge & Jurors - Saw & Heard that evidence & found him Guilty, Beyond A Reasonable Doubt. He has had all the appeals he will Ever get & the Innocence Project rejected his application due to the Overwhelming evidence that showed Exactly what he did to this poor girl Plus his previous degenerate & violent behaviours. His own Brother testified Against him & he nor their father have had Anything to do with Luke since the trial Nor that so-called mother. They sure as hell have Nothing to do with this Shameful campaign which is all just a white-wash for Money.
His highly sadistic Premeditated crime was so heinous & wicked it's likely that he'll Never get out.
Sandra Lean & now Scott Forbes wrote books of BS to line their Own pockets & all the media hoo ha for over 3 years on utube videos has some people hypnotised because that's the Whole Aim. Yep, of course they blame the cops, that's how Both Con Artists rake in the hard-done-by members of society in particular.
Over 40 police & seasoned investigators worked this case for a Long time & the cops did a Great job by putting that scumbag child killer Exactly where he needs to be.
.. What are the untruths?.. serious question.. I really am undecided about this case..
@@imemine6494 untruth Jodi was not in her house She was last seen in the China garden at 1300pm with school friends
@@ronm9101.. we know this, as this was the day her mother let her out, after being grounded?
@@imemine6494 well no Jodi's Gran and sister confirmed Jodi was not grounded at that time ot the night before
Can you please keep up to speed with things
So why are you not
Jodi's family left Jodi laying in the mud and rain
If you think for one minute That I am going to let this go
No chance They LEFT her in the mud all alone
That is one sick family
Poor lassie
Skinwalker you are giving untruths
About Luke and the case
It say in the podcast at 19.00 that remains of clothing were found in the wood burner at the Mitchell's house, but Dr Sandra Lean states that this was not in fact the case. Which account is correct?
If Sandra Lean told me It was 2021 Id have my doubts.
There was zero found in the log burner except remains of wood. This sh*** was fabricated by Police along with all the stuff about the Black Dahlia and Manson. They made it up.
@@Sunburst75 The log burner was dissmissed in the court, It wasnt used as evidence.
@@ourwilliam2405 Aye because they found nil in it
@Can't bearsed Anymore The neighbours smelled a different smell coming from their garden. It was the Mitchells that said they had used the burner that night. They had four days to clean it before it was taken away. They couldnt find any evidence of burnt clothes but it wouldnt have mattered anyway as his alibis were utter lies.
The street he said he was standing on, a jogger was running past at that time and NEVER saw him. Another nail in the coffin for him.
How can people say he defo committed this crime .When all Scientific data and tests prove otherwise?
What scientific data is that?
@@ourwilliam2405 watch the doc about it.
@@Gioachina0279 The doc is the biggest load of nonsence Ive ever seen.
Can someone explain to me how he hasn’t been granted a retrial when there was nothing to connect him to this murder whatsoever. This wouldn’t even be allowed in court today. This man has lost years of his life for a murderer still on the loose. Watching the documentary filled me with anger and sadness. I just don’t understand how this can happen.
@Can't bearsed Anymore aye joe steele and tc Campbell and a few others ie ira bombers there's plenty wrongly convicted with circumstantial evidence for a valid conviction to stand in Scots there should be at least two corroborating parts of direct evidence not circumstantial as you can't prove beyond a reasonable doubt with circumstantial evidence oryty
@@Sunburst75 well said been saying for 4 months on here and fb that the jones family should take a lie test then you will find out who killed that poor lass shame on them they know he's innocent and so do we
@Can't bearsed Anymore no chance he would get Rod of all traces even in six hours fs an experienced forensic expert would struggle with the amount of trace from scene ie blood hair soil sperms get a grip the lad never done it
@scrooge 64 not all traces though luminol would have found a trace none in finger scrapes or anywhere else
@Terese Bowen the question you state were asked at lie detector test and she and luke passed on all questions maybe that will shut you up with your false narrative you keep pushing
Really enjoy ur stuff mate love hearing about true crime stories, was a shock to see this tho as jodi is apart of my family enjoyed listening to what u said tho keep up the work!
Thanks for the feedback. I hope you found that we put the story across in a way which was caring and sympathetic in respect of what Jodi went through, as well as being factual.
I think mark Kane was involved
@@stephaniegarden2849 He was seen on cctv no scratches & was never a suspect
I have posted some info above to Jamie-lee Godfrey, I think you should read. Cheers. Sandra needs to be stopped
@@bethryan9077 There was only ever 1 suspect. Very blinkered to say the least.
Corine gives me the creeps. Heard her on the James English podcast, something very off about her. Where's her ex husband of 20yrs, is he not fighting for his son's freedom? Or does his dad accept that Luke did it? He's had four appeals rejected for good reason. He had trial in front of a jury of his peers and was found guilty. No good evidence has ever emerged that anyone else was responsible but him. The fact he wont accept responsibility is moot. He wont be the first.
It speaks volumes that his dad and brother have never fought to get luke cleared.their silence is deafening.
Sandra has history of defending guilty killers.i think she has issues tbh.not right in thr head.
@@neondemon7617 Well said
@@markvega5036 also if he ever does confess hes a dead man.his life wont be worth living.all the lies saying he isnt on protection in shotts when in fact he is and always will be.
@@neondemon7617 It wont happen mate. He's held out this long.
@@markvega5036 sadly your probably right
Professor Paul Eckman ( 29.40) actually stated [about Luke Mitchell on the SKY Interview] that "There were signs he was concealing his contempt for the police, but he might be innocent and have a lot of contempt for the police, so there was nothing definitive that said he had murdered this girl.
"There are cases like this where I can't tell - or sometimes people are just not asked the right question." ( Daily Record, 12 May 2009).
Thanks for the podcast
Channel 5 show was one sided rubbish. Forgot to mention prosecution case.
Guilty as charged. Why did he burn Jacket and mum replaced with identical one? Where was his knife? He arranged to meet her....Lukes own brother trashed his alibi and said he wasn't at home...
Zero evidence of him burning any clothing, the fishing knife he owned was too small to be used in the mutilation of Jodi, but it was actually found and handed into police, and there is no record of jodi and luke agreeing to meet. Please check your facts on both sides, before you start talking your one sided rubbish.
@Terese Bowen everything u just said is wrong. And I said the fishing knife was too small to match the wounds inflicted. U seem to know a lot u think you’d understand how forensics works. They can tell what sort of blade or sharp instrument would’ve been used. And whether it was before or after it was still mutilation. Now go and look at all the facts before u start spouting more unreliable jargon.
Wheres the evidence for that you can't trace Ash back to any material so where is the evidence for it it wasn't there cause it never happened
@Terese Bowen the knife your talking about was bought after the murder you really like posting false bullshit don't ya troll
@Terese Bowen no you don't I've schooled you on your false lies from last night so bolt your nothing but a liar seems to me you might be connected to the jones family in some way if you are then you probably know he's innocent
This happened right behind where I lived and beside my school. I’ll never forget it
@@captainbeeflaps5612 eh what you on about ?
Who the hell is that??
@@Biggee1982 Are you the killer?
@@artvandelayRFC no but are you ?
@scrooge 64 I’m not convinced it was him
That was very interesting..but the thing is Dr Lean says in her podcast that there were no evidence of any clothes or anything other than wood having been burned in the wood burner..Is she right..or are you right?
Hi Louise, we simply go off of reported facts and tell the story unbiased. This is a reported fact, however, Sandra Lean has done her own investigation and is close with the Mitchell family so may believe different. That is not to say that she is incorrect.
Thank you so much for that ....👍🏻
There was no proof that clothes were burned in the wood burner.
@@skinwalkertruecrime4102 Sandra was not close with Corinne before this. They didn’t know each other.
@@liannamackie Correct, and if you look at our response above you will see that we didnt state she was close with them before the crime. You can find Sandra Leans story of how she got involved in the case in interviews though, which in her own words, she states she didnt know much about the justice system beforehand and this case pushed her into learning and also of how they became close throughout her investigation.
What are you talking about
Knives
What are you on about There was nothing in the burner
Funny how they all change tere tune the other search party x
Funny how Luke, Corrine & then Shane changed the BS alibi more than once, for that child killer, within One Week. Shane at least came to his senses & Testified that Luke was Not home & he also said that Corrine had coerced him into giving Luke a False alibi before, as She had done.
Good video but you seemed to concentrate on the prosecution "evidence" too much and spent very little time on anything connected to Mitchell's defence. One now disproven "fact" in your video is the discovery of the Mark Kane essay as being fake, it turns out those very essays have been in Police custody all along and were never shown to the defence team. As for the lie detector test, you've been very disingenuous about the circumstances in which it was done and of Mitchell's behaviour during it. The test was performed in prison and the guards were present and staring and distracting Mitchell, it was Terry Mullins that told Mitchell to turn away from them and close his eyes. To suggest the fact that the Mitchells paid for the test doesn't invalidate the results and to suggest Mr Mullins would be less than honest could probably have landed you in court. What would be more impressive would be for certain members of the Jones family to take the lie detector test and pass it. Sorry, but I'll have to give your video a thumbs down.
Luke went to search he diddent know the others were gonna be searching x
Luke Mitchell was before a court of Law with 20 Chapters of evidence against him, which is a Lot for one defendant. The High Court Judge & Jurors - Saw & Heard that evidence & found him Guilty, Beyond A Reasonable Doubt. He has had all the appeals he will Ever get & the Innocence Project rejected his application due to the Overwhelming evidence that showed Exactly what he did to this poor girl Plus his previous degenerate & violent behaviours. His own Brother testified Against him & he nor their father have had Anything to do with Luke since the trial Nor that so-called mother. They sure as hell have Nothing to do with this Shameful campaign which is all just a white-wash for Money.
His highly sadistic Premeditated crime was so heinous & wicked it's likely that he'll Never get out.
Sandra Lean & now Scott Forbes wrote books of BS to line their Own pockets & all the media hoo ha for over 3 years on utube videos has some people hypnotised because that's the Whole Aim. Yep, of course they blame the cops, that's how Both Con Artists rake in the hard-done-by members of society in particular.
Over 40 police & seasoned investigators worked this case for a Long time & the cops did a Great job by putting that scumbag child killer Exactly where he needs to be.
@@bethryan9077 Beth Lyin How many times have you copied and pasted this dross? I can't believe how many videos you have trawled just to comment on this case. Once again I bet you are a family member/friend/acquaintance because you are hardcore with this.
I've picked out another wee lie you peddle and that's Luke's brother Shane didn't testify against him, Shane told the truth to the best of his recollection. He was upstairs having a wank and Police computer records prove that and it was roughly during the same time that Luke phoned the talking clock. It's very easy to get days mixed up especially if day in and day out you do the same things but one of those days changes slightly.
Judith jones asent in the search party
Most people here after the recent documentaries..?........ boy could be innocent after All what a waste of a life 😥
Luke Mitchell was before a court of Law with 20 Chapters of evidence against him, which is a Lot for one defendant. The High Court Judge & Jurors - Saw & Heard that evidence & found him Guilty, Beyond A Reasonable Doubt. He has had all the appeals he will Ever get & the Innocence Project rejected his application due to the Overwhelming evidence that showed Exactly what he did to this poor girl Plus his previous degenerate & violent behaviours. His own Brother testified Against him & he nor their father have had Anything to do with Luke since the trial Nor that so-called mother. They sure as hell have Nothing to do with this Shameful campaign which is all just a white-wash for Money.
His highly sadistic Premeditated crime was so heinous & wicked it's likely that he'll Never get out.
Sandra Lean & now Scott Forbes wrote books of BS to line their Own pockets & all the media hoo ha for over 3 years on utube videos has some people hypnotised because that's the Whole Aim. Yep, of course they blame the cops, that's how Both Con Artists rake in the hard-done-by members of society in particular.
Over 40 police & seasoned investigators worked this case for a Long time & the cops did a Great job by putting that scumbag child killer Exactly where he needs to be.
@@bethryan9077 you clearly know more than me I didn’t follow the trial but from what I saw, there could be reasonable doubt thanks for the insight
@@yogibear3177 Don't being so friggin Ridiculous & stop believing that Con Artist.
@@yogibear3177 Beths' version is very misleading, 20 chapters isn't a lot of evidence against a murder case.
@@bethryan9077 Beth and her opinion, again. Stop the subterfuge, 20 chapters isn't a lot of evidence in a murder case. Many High Court Judges and Jurors also heard the cases of Stefan Kiszko, Patrick Armstrong, Paul Michael Hill, Carole Richardson, Gerry Conlon, Patrick Maguire Snr, Anne Maguire, Patrick Maguire Jnr, Vincent Maguire, Sean Smyth, Patrick O'Neill, Guiseppe Conlon, Hugh Callaghan, Patrick Joseph Hill, Gerard Hunter, Richard McIlkenny, William Power, John Walker, Stephen Downing, Joseph Steele, Tommy Campbell, Steven Miller, Yusef Abdullahi, Tony Paris, Barry George and convicted them all, only for their convictions to be quashed many years later. Shows your "evidence-based" opinion in a different light.
The over pronounced “R” at every opportunity by this narrator is extremely annoying
Take your negativity elsewhere… RRRRRoss
Think it was jdis cousin supplied them all x
Luke Mitchell was not only a drug Addict who used pot & hash Daily, as well at School, he was a drug Dealer & was also Convicted of that Also.
What upsets me is there must be police who investigated it at the time that must have thought wait a minute here this isnt right,has the top man on the job had the final say and told them all to tow the line,if so its tragic to say the least,must be terrible for both families involved.:(
There would have been detectives in charge of the investigation.
talking shite ,, there was no burnt clothes ,,,
i stayed in dalkeith at the time.will never forget the events of summer 2003.luke has a lot of supporters but he definatley did it.he will never admit his guilt as he would put his mother right in the shit.she covered up for him...
For someone to say he definitely did it with all the evidence in his favour about a wrong conviction, you sure yer heads okay mate
And yet she passed a lie detector test saying she didnt!
It was her brother and cousin! The brother confessed!! Truth will always come out eventually!
@@scottlucas1471 There are 20 chapters of circumstancial evidence against him. Thats a lot compared to most cases.
@@ourwilliam2405 can have as much circumstantial evidence you want means nothing to me, zero forensic evidence with the types of wounds suffered tells me it wasn’t him and the police took the easy way out
King Bear and Sunburst around here too???🙄
Im here ! What about it?