Simple. China has an economic card up its sleeve. And that card is the belt and road initiative. It is odd for China and the taliban to be allies due to the fact China is hard-line agaisnt islamism and taliban is not to keen on communism.
China has been very consistent, they are not keen on exporting ideologies like USSR and US is doing right now. Most muslim countries today are much more comfortable dealing with China than US is because US often interfere into their internal affairs and forcing values that are not acceptable to them. You can pull out statistic claiming a lot of countries support US, but that largely doesn't matter because those statistic only represent the ordinary people, not government officials.
China's foreign policy is (officially at least) not meddling in internal affairs, China's inner policy has been in the last decades extremely capitalist (even if officially they maintain the "communist" formality, mostly a relic). China is not "hard line" against islamism: it makes deal with them in many countries such as Sudan, Iran or even Turkey (a NATO member that is also under islamist spell). They just want to control (or at least access) all that matters to them no matter how. The main difference with the USA (other than single party vs twin party) is that their foreign policy is "Bismarckian", while the US foreign policy is "Victorian" instead (or even more aggresive maybe but in any case on the footsteps of the British Empire). By "Bismarckian" I mean the kind of soft gloved imperialism that Germany practiced under Bismark, focused on getting access to open resources rather than forging an empire or even mostly challenging others' empires. That way they managed to overcome Britain c. 1900, making WWI probably unavoidable.
@@Al-ng2wn lol exporting ideologies? Most expansionist nations export some sort of ideology. But yes China did learn alot from the fall of the Soviet union and liberalized there economy. But yes America did export ideology to Afghanistan in the form of gender studies school and evangelical churches in which both are part of American cultural institutional apparatus.
If Chairman Mao saw China today he'd partially be angry but also happy China was a global power. He'd probably start another cultural revolution. That being said yes China gave up exporting communist global revolution in the late 70s after Mao died. If anything the CCP ideology now is Chinese nationalism.
@Ibrahim Suleman alright good. My point is that if you allow known Terrorist groups to operate and flourish you might as well be known as a Terrorist group.
@@Matstoen Is Kenya Tanzania (jabbering at me for no proximate reason above) 'the algorithm'? I suspect the algorithm doesn't appreciate being openly manipulated like this.
@@SimonNZ6969 and since when does the West care about Human rights. The West industrialized and dveloped it's economies by invading, enslaving and colonizing the whole world, including parts of China and the whole of Africa, India, South East Asia, Australia and the Americas.
Because not only is Pakistan a MNNA, but also hosts bases for the US military to operate around South Asia this whole time, but don't expect your history channels to talk about that.
K I'm from pakistan and I'm gonna say it no we all ain't no terrorists and we dont support the Taliban I mean look at the Peshawar school attack operation zarb e azb
Man all these videos on Afghanistan have made me so interested in the country as barely anyone talks about its history in depth and you always find out something new due to how little exposure the topic receives from a non American/Western perspective
I don't agree that China is cracking down on Uighurs. They are cracking down hard on terrorists, which means a lot of innocent people wind up being caught up in. And judging from there not having been a terrorist attack in almost half a decade now, it seems to be working.
"notwithstanding the lack of engagement by other countries with afganistan, the present engagement between the two countries with regards to the future of their relationship is being conducted in such a way that the respective countries' relationships with other countries are thoroughly discussed between, but not limited to, the assigned interlocutors, in a fair and amicable manner as to not to depart from the common objectives of the two countries"
@@fiendish9474 shut up. the us has a history of doing that already, the mujahadeen were considered "freedom fighters" despite the fact that they were largely taliban Beta version. stop trying to make this some dumbass "political correctness sucks" nonsense.
11:54 On the stock of a gun that one of the cartoon Taliban characters is holding; there is Pashto inscription that says, "Belgium, who is that?" What does that mean, I wonder how that ended up there.
Thank you for these amazing videos. The amount of knowledge you put in these videos is incredible. I always learn multiple things watching your videos on this channel. Keep up the great work, this really helps a lot of people learn many things.
Operation Flashpoint: Red River has the US Marines in Tajikistan to fight ETIM terrorists and a subsequent Chinese invasion. Not that I'm saying all of that is likely.
This channel deserves millions of subscribers! The information in these videos are always good and reliable information without a lot of bias... it's amazing how much time and research you put into all of these different topics, whether its ancient history, modern history or present history... I appreciate you keeping as much bias as possible out of the videos and not having a agenda! Keep up the great work
@@edwartvonfectonia4362 Génocides by forcefully integrating them into the majority population, maybe if France did it there wouldn't be so many terror attacks
@@jonseilim4321 concentration camps for uyghurs is not integrating. Forceful dismantling of turkic families, especially men from their children is a crime against basic human rights. I know people who fled. Don't think that it is a "greater good" for a glorious country.
US invades Afghanistan Comment section: Fxxk Yehhhh US leaves Afghanistan Comment section: Oh good for them China befriends Afghanistan Comment section: Hey hey hey that's illegal.
Anyone else think we'll never heard again about insurgencies as soon as "Terminator" like drones become available to protect the oil/mining fields of big business?
Even Russia which occupied Afghanistan for ten years has an open Embassy. Both countries know the value of Afghans natural resources and the fact that 90% of Afghan wealth is held outside the country.
"...When religion and politics travel in the same cart, the riders believe nothing can stand in their way. Their movements become headlong - faster and faster and faster. They put aside all thoughts of obstacles and forget the precipice does not show itself to the man in a blind rush until it's too late....” Bene Gesseritt coda "...It is more difficult to organize peace than to win a war; but the fruits of victory will be lost if the peace is not well organized..." Aristotle
@@HaventheDemoness-vy9lx Money talks at the end, Taliban already said they have no problems with China, Pakistan and china are allies which will make Afghanistan also an ally which will anger India as there close, Me as an Afghan also recognises the situation in China, but when ur country has been in war non stop for century, I think theres a time when enough is enough and make ur country developing nation rather than wage war on China when ur country is already doomed
Rare earth minerals, contrary to popular belief and the name, is in fact not rare at all. It's just never really concentrated enough, so much so that to mine it requires turning over a lot of materials and end up with a lot of polluting tailing. If given no other options, "western countries" are perfectly capable of exploiting their own rare earth mineral deposits. They prefer to shit in other people's yards instead.
@@BicyclesMayUseFullLane I mean yeah, pretty much every continent has a pretty respectable amount of every material needed to sustain a society for a long time, it’s just that superpowers love exploiting backwater nations in order to get it cheap it’s geopolitics 100
I mean, pakistan and Inda are natural enemies, China and India are natural enemies, Pakistan and Afghanistan are natural allies, therefore, the friends of the enemies of my enemies are my friends? Why not?
Not to mention the ancient knowledge that is kept all over the Middle East. Many Empires have spent millions of dollars and countless hours exploring the Middle East while looking for this knowledge. Hitler spent millions, along with tons of resources to try to find certain knowledge around Iraq and Afghantisan... which probably lead to the Germans having some of the best technology in the world at the time... Russia did it after them. There is something there that people are looking for. Some kind of knowledge and power.
As always great stuff man, didnt know about china's support for the Talies. Its interesting indeed how all of this is going to play out in geopolitics...no doubt if there is "fresh history" coming out of Afghanistan you will cover it. However i think its a healthy thing to keep a broad scope too...after all: All history matters😜 Keep up the good work, Cheers🇳🇱
If you want to know what's interesting; produce a video on the history of Ahmad Shah Massoud beyond what the packaged mainstream views on him have become
@@brandonblackfyre5783 CIA agent of the west and an opportunist just like his son right now, but he fled to france after Taliban entered panjshir and are looking for outsiders to help him in the civil war
9:33 China hasn't confirmed any plans on whether they will invest as generously as you've implied as far as I know, perhaps you could provide sources? More likely mining and infrastructure for those operations only
Yes, a corrupt, international bribe-fueled, debt strangling system is exactly what these countries and people need. For example, look at Pakistan selling out Uyghurs muslims, their brothers, to overlord China. Money rules all.
@@shadden_x the Pakistan GOVERNMENT sells out the Uyghurs, I know tons of Pakistanis who does not support the CCP You should stop equating people with it’s government. By your logic if the CIA supported the Pol pot that means the US citizens also support pol pot and all his crimes
@@shadden_x and what about the US. The same country that’s fine with Israel and their antics. The same country that invaded Iraq and Afghanistan. The same country who is fine with the Saudi’s and their actions in Yemen while also hurting Syria. Again using your logic, we can apply the same thinking to the IMF, whose loans literally have Pakistan on a noose and can entirely destroy the whole economy of Pakistan. Don’t those equate to a “debt strangling system”. At least the Chinese make sure to build infrastructure themselves but any corrupt politician can take out a loan and destroy the country subsequently, which is what happened to Pakistan. China isn’t a happy field of frolics but neither is the USA. And would you look at that the USA only yesterday did a “Surgical Strike” against a terrorist in Afghanistan only for it to be an aid worker being welcomed by 7 damn children. All dead for nothing but a hypocritical superpower.
Sadly, this simply underlines how stupid America's policy has been: it should have made clear that it went into Afghanistan to neutralise Al Quaida, and not to remake Afghanistan in its own image: if it had done that and then got out and simply offered financial and other aid to Afghanistan, it would have benefited both Afghanistan and itself hugely. Now it will have to tread even more carefully with China. Let us hope that America can see that both it and China have an interest in ensuring that Afghanistan does not again become a hotbed for terrorism, and negotiate with China on that basis, rather than simply seeing China as a threat. We can but hope that there are sensible back-door talks of some sort going on between America and China: Anerica has strong leverage since it has Afghanistan's financial reserves: a partnership between China and Anerica to allow Afghanistan to rebuild itself and prosper would be by far the best way of ensuring that terrorist groups are not welcome in Afghanistan. Does the American Government have the imagination and guts to do that?
Ultimately there's no possible negotiation between the USA and China: they are both top dogs of their respective blocs and they are doomed to fight each other until either collapses or a third power emerges.
@@LuisAldamiz for over a century France and Prussia/Germany had a similar idea, until the horror of World War II brought them to see that cooperation was better than war, and they formed the ECSC which essentially became the EU, and have been at peace for 70 years. One can hope that America, like France and Germany then, having been defeated in Afghanistan, has the sense to realise it has to at least try to work with, rather than against, China to stabilise the area: China, being Afghanistan's neighbour, must already know that, so, given careful diplomacy, America could find itself kicking at an open door-China probably faces some economic turbulence with its attempt to bring its overheated property market under control, so could easily welcome an initiative which allowed America to release Afghanistan's reserves, thereby putting less strain on China's economy: imagination is what we need; not fresh hostilities, even diplomatic ones.
@@rogerdines6244 - But that's not global competition anymore: Europe was not anymore top dog in global affairs after WWII (unless you count the USSR as such). If there were any doubts they were dispelled in the Suez Crisis a few years later. The EU and also its rival model, the EFTA, were made to organized US vassals in more efficient ways and prevent conflicts among them. Europe was pretty much finished in the 50s and could only operate as vassals (plural) of the leading superpowers: USA and USSR (now USA and China).
@@rogerdines6244 - You have to read Lenin's work on "Imperialism", it's about the best he ever wrote. He uses the classical case of Britain and Portugal to explain how can a capitalist and imperialist country become subservient of another. But that also means that ultimately only two top dogs can co-exist and they do so in terms of total rivalry. This is of course in capitalist conditions, which are intrinsically competitive. It's possible that it may be different in socialist conditons but China is not anymore socialist and is not at all interested in socialism. Bolshevik model systems ultimately just used socialism (in Fordist global conditions) to promote national growth and proto-capitalist autonomous development, totally not the original idea of socialism/communism but that's what actually happened.
China has been around a long time, and has survived historical events that some civilizations have never recovered from. It would be wise not to underestimate them.
No kidding. Their culture is, and to my knowledge always has been, very hierarchically ordered. Communism was somehow an appropriate fit. I'd take it over Stalinism, for sure.
@@lolasdm6959 maybe bureaucracy would have been a better term to use in China's case. Of course, there is a hierarchy in every government, because there has never been a governmental body that is a pure form of one system or another. Any system of government, Communism included, has to have someone run it. I think bureaucracy stands in for hierarchy in this case.
Are you talking about China as a civilization or states? Because their states have fallen repeatedly, and they've had several civil war / warring states periods. As for civilizations, there's been plenty of civilizations that stood 3000 to 1000 years long. I wouldn't really single out China for praise in this context.
China has no desire to expand its border to include Afghanistan like the Soviet Union or change the country to reflect Western values like NATO. They are only about business and will not interfere in Afghans internal affairs as long as the Taliban don't aid others to interfere in China's internal affairs.
@@DanielAtHome1 Nope. Not a Bot. The world doesn't buy into the Western saviour nonsense promoted by Western govts and NGOs. The world has become a worse place due to the endless stupid actions of Western govts regardless of party that have wasted taxes on military adventurism abroad for the interest of the few wealthy disguised as geostrategic national interests.
"The only thing that binds [The US, Britain and the USSR] together is our hatred of the Nazis, and hate really isn't the best foundation for a relationship." -Winston Churchill, 1945
Keep china in Afghanistan for long enough, let them do the same operations they do in Africa and Latin America then eventually the people will resent them and possibly rebel. I sense china in the next few decades will create their own Afghanistan war.
@Ashhhadic Century the Taliban is a Pashtun majority ruling over a multiethnic states (pashtuns, hazari, Uzbeks, tajiks and very few uighurs). Supporting the Uighurs may result in them losing power.
@@icysaracen3054 Therefore that’s why you will see more low ranking Taliban members defecting a lot as they don’t have power to lose anyways. Uyghur problem isn’t going no where as it’s already rooted and things like IS k too.
It's interesting to see how strong a devout leaders faith is when tested with money. The Taliban as well as every single other self-proclaimed champions of Islam not only turn a blind eye, but even form alliances with someone who is actively carrying out the persecution of over 1.5 Muslims in China... "The Qur’an (4:75) allows the use of force for defending other Muslims who are oppressed and are unable to defend themselves: ‘what has happened to you that you do not fight in the way of Allah and for the oppressed among men, women and children’. Here we find a different meaning. Whilst verse 22:39 allows the use of force in self-defence, verse 4:75 permits the use of force in the defence of those who are persecuted for believing in Islam and are unable to defend themselves. The threshold for using force in the defence of oppressed and weak Muslims is that the oppression suffered must be so severe as to compel Muslims to leave their homes, for instance, genocide or torture." Hmmm, sounds sort of like what China has done and is still doing to Uyghur Muslims in China... " [Islamic] justice.’38 ‘Islam is not a party of preachers and missionaries but rather of divine enforcers. Its mission is to blot out, by force if necessary, oppression, moral anarchy, social disorder and exploitation … and replace evil with good. " Perhaps that don't apply to those who are giving you money?... Praise to Allah! ... Unless ofcourse you pay me. 👳👳♀️🧕🙏 + 🇨🇳💵 = 🙈🙉🙊
As an American who is angry and confused that my government would abandon the Afghan people, your history of Afghanistan has helped me understand the situation.
Agreed. He's been really jumping the gun with these videos lately. Is it just to race to get views? Going off too many assumptions and hearsay before they've even developed yet into anything meaningful, just like the Panjshir rebellion. The US didn't leave Afghanistan and push out the Soviets before that, just for China to grab the country. Likewise, the IEA/Taliban aren't going to let China do that either. The IEA has asked _all_ its neighbors to invest in Afghanistan, not just China. And its just a fact of reality that any country-especially third-world countries-are going to be trading with China with a lot of manufacturing coming from there anyways.
The West and India hopes to use the Uighurs to launch Islamic terror attacks on China, but China got ahead of the game and now is in position now counter by directing Islamic extremists back against the West. Two can play at this game.
Except the Taliban in Pakistan are still fighting the government there. And they still have significant link to the Taliban in Afghanistan and Al queida. I wouldn't so sure how this works in the long run
@@youngking2503 lol,Pakistan's Taliban is on the brink of collapse,after Pak army launched operation Zarb e Azm it curse Pakistani Taliban and now they struggle to keep control of even half of a district!
There are two kinds of history UA-camr's: the one's that are shit at pronouncing foreign names and don't care much, and then there's Hilbert and others who try too hard and nail some but butcher others 🙊
It must be mentioned that the Taliban was partly created by the Pakistani Intelligence Service, the ISI in 1994. While it did have some Mujahideen fighters it wasn't Mujahideen. The American backed Northern Alliance was mostly former Mujahideen as was several of the anti Taliban Insurgencies.
CCP: "We do not interfere in the internal affairs of other countries" also CCP: invites Taliban to Tianjin, welcoming them with open arms, while the Afghan government still sits in Kabul.
There is no alliance, alliance implies a common eneny. Now that US is out of Afghanistan, Taliban really have no reason (or the means) to attack United States. And China don't do alliances in general.
No China doesn't care about what happens in a foreign nation as long as Chinese investments are not attacked. And even then, China would just pull out and look elsewhere.
"Politics is war without bloodshed, while war is politics with bloodshed"
- Mao Zedong
“‘War is young men dying,
And old men talking.”’
- Odysseus, king of Ithaca.
(As much as we can quote a 3000 year old statement. lol.)
Mao, were Is my Rice!!!
"War is the extension of politics by other means."
Either Carl von Clausewitz or Otto von Bismarck, I don't remember which.
Mao is likely the worst and least skilled statesman to have ever lived.
@@domnoya4130 Poor statesman true, excellent military man for conquest.
basically the media wants taliban to include those people whom Taliban fought to replace 😂😂😂😂😂😂
Sound ridiculous, it's comparable to the media wants the allies to include the Nazi in new Germany after WW2
@@aaaa6251 hipocritical much
🟢SERCH ADITYA RATHORE-HE ALSO MAKES INFORMATIVE CONTENT LIKE HISTORY WITH HILBORT
@OneMuslim Ummah ameen
@OneMuslim Ummah no. The war on terror was a vendetta Mission and for that worked, then they tryed state Building and that failed
Is very simple, the Taliban needs money and recognition, China needs Afghan mineral resources and an ally in Central Asia.
Nice that you are highlighting aspects of recent events that are not covered by regular news channels
Simple. China has an economic card up its sleeve. And that card is the belt and road initiative. It is odd for China and the taliban to be allies due to the fact China is hard-line agaisnt islamism and taliban is not to keen on communism.
China has been very consistent, they are not keen on exporting ideologies like USSR and US is doing right now. Most muslim countries today are much more comfortable dealing with China than US is because US often interfere into their internal affairs and forcing values that are not acceptable to them. You can pull out statistic claiming a lot of countries support US, but that largely doesn't matter because those statistic only represent the ordinary people, not government officials.
China's foreign policy is (officially at least) not meddling in internal affairs, China's inner policy has been in the last decades extremely capitalist (even if officially they maintain the "communist" formality, mostly a relic). China is not "hard line" against islamism: it makes deal with them in many countries such as Sudan, Iran or even Turkey (a NATO member that is also under islamist spell). They just want to control (or at least access) all that matters to them no matter how. The main difference with the USA (other than single party vs twin party) is that their foreign policy is "Bismarckian", while the US foreign policy is "Victorian" instead (or even more aggresive maybe but in any case on the footsteps of the British Empire). By "Bismarckian" I mean the kind of soft gloved imperialism that Germany practiced under Bismark, focused on getting access to open resources rather than forging an empire or even mostly challenging others' empires. That way they managed to overcome Britain c. 1900, making WWI probably unavoidable.
not to mention china is atheist which calls for death by islamic law
@@Al-ng2wn lol exporting ideologies? Most expansionist nations export some sort of ideology. But yes China did learn alot from the fall of the Soviet union and liberalized there economy. But yes America did export ideology to Afghanistan in the form of gender studies school and evangelical churches in which both are part of American cultural institutional apparatus.
If Chairman Mao saw China today he'd partially be angry but also happy China was a global power. He'd probably start another cultural revolution. That being said yes China gave up exporting communist global revolution in the late 70s after Mao died. If anything the CCP ideology now is Chinese nationalism.
USA: Thank Lord Jesus Christ we are out
Taliban: Allahuakbar we are in
China: 你好
Mate look up the definition of the word. Don't associate it with a Terrorist group. Have a good day 👍
@Ibrahim Suleman how about you get your facts straight. What makes a Terrorist group what it is?
Are you muslim?
@Ibrahim Suleman alright good. My point is that if you allow known Terrorist groups to operate and flourish you might as well be known as a Terrorist group.
@Ibrahim Suleman I see you're point. I am not okay with the innocent people dying though
Sorry: forgot to say thank you for all your hard work, but that just adds another comment to attract the algorithm!
Indeed, I engage your engagement!
Attract the algorithm🤔 "come to me, algorithm".. ok, so now the algorithm is closer than it was before. Nice attraction of the algorithm😂
@@johnd2058 Compare 1930s Nazi Germany Vs 2020s Communist Chinazi IN YOUR NEXT VIDEO Project.
@@Matstoen Is Kenya Tanzania (jabbering at me for no proximate reason above) 'the algorithm'? I suspect the algorithm doesn't appreciate being openly manipulated like this.
@@johnd2058 the algorithm itself 🙌🏻 we made it!
China is somewhat pragmatic. So long as money keeps flowing and you don't talk shit about them they will lend you their hand
Ruthlessly Pragmatic. They don't care about "silly" things like "Human Rights" and "Common Decency."
@King Crusader thousands of people will die in China in a few days in it's ETHNO state regime not one of them will be given funerals but okay
@@asscheeks3212 Han Chinese Ethnomstate, they don’t really have the most positive record treating their minorities well
@@SimonNZ6969 and since when does the West care about Human rights. The West industrialized and dveloped it's economies by invading, enslaving and colonizing the whole world, including parts of China and the whole of Africa, India, South East Asia, Australia and the Americas.
@@danwelterweight4137 whataboutism doesn't help things when your goal is no more murder.
"The smile of a child is just a lack of life exprience" My dad.
Bet your dad was fun!
Am surprised how Russia seems to get Sanction every year but Pakistan was left alone to continue making deals/support Taliban.
Because not only is Pakistan a MNNA, but also hosts bases for the US military to operate around South Asia this whole time, but don't expect your history channels to talk about that.
@@tritium1998 they're also still a member of the Commonwealth, which is ridiculous.
They don't want to lose a nuclear Ally to China
@@MrTaxiRob wanna know what's more ridiculous
INDIA is also part of the commonwealth
K I'm from pakistan and I'm gonna say it no we all ain't no terrorists and we dont support the Taliban I mean look at the Peshawar school attack operation zarb e azb
Man all these videos on Afghanistan have made me so interested in the country as barely anyone talks about its history in depth and you always find out something new due to how little exposure the topic receives from a non American/Western perspective
I don't agree that China is cracking down on Uighurs. They are cracking down hard on terrorists, which means a lot of innocent people wind up being caught up in. And judging from there not having been a terrorist attack in almost half a decade now, it seems to be working.
no they are if your musilm they put you in those camps vice news made a doc on it jus search it up fr fr
Rename the channel to Afghanistan with Hilbert :' )
you bet
Permanent Secretary Sir Humphrey Appleby approves of their relationship.
Doubt it, he'd just say "foreign office issue".
lol
I do not approve of their relationship
🟩SERCH ADITYA RATHORE-HE ALSO MAKES INFORMATIVE CONTENT LIKE HISTORY WITH HILBORT
"notwithstanding the lack of engagement by other countries with afganistan, the present engagement between the two countries with regards to the future of their relationship is being conducted in such a way that the respective countries' relationships with other countries are thoroughly discussed between, but not limited to, the assigned interlocutors, in a fair and amicable manner as to not to depart from the common objectives of the two countries"
Tbh, it's kinda weird that the same Taliban was called as terrorists couple of years ago and now they are called fighters? Wtf
Calling terrorists terrorists is offensive now, it's [current year]
They stopped calling them terrorists because they have to do business with them now.
@@fiendish9474 shut up.
the us has a history of doing that already, the mujahadeen were considered "freedom fighters" despite the fact that they were largely taliban Beta version.
stop trying to make this some dumbass "political correctness sucks" nonsense.
11:54 On the stock of a gun that one of the cartoon Taliban characters is holding; there is Pashto inscription that says, "Belgium, who is that?"
What does that mean, I wonder how that ended up there.
He likes to make subtle jokes about Belgium being Dutch territory in some of his videos.
@@Lord_Of_Aether it needs to be netherlands
@@Lord_Of_Aether I didn't know. Thanks so much.
Thank you for these amazing videos. The amount of knowledge you put in these videos is incredible. I always learn multiple things watching your videos on this channel. Keep up the great work, this really helps a lot of people learn many things.
Cant believe they made the plot of Command & Conquer General into real life
GLA Postal Service. Nothing stops the mail
Operation Flashpoint: Red River has the US Marines in Tajikistan to fight ETIM terrorists and a subsequent Chinese invasion. Not that I'm saying all of that is likely.
This channel deserves millions of subscribers! The information in these videos are always good and reliable information without a lot of bias... it's amazing how much time and research you put into all of these different topics, whether its ancient history, modern history or present history... I appreciate you keeping as much bias as possible out of the videos and not having a agenda! Keep up the great work
Yeah he's underrated.
"The board is set and the pieces are moving..."
~Gandalf
Another great and informative video from you. Thanks,
An atheist and a radical Islamist working together. Maybe religion is in second place after money.
An atheist who slowly genocides muslim people and islamists. No place for religion nor morality.
@@edwartvonfectonia4362 Génocides by forcefully integrating them into the majority population, maybe if France did it there wouldn't be so many terror attacks
@@jonseilim4321 I mean they tried in Algeria didn't work ended up in hundreds of thousands death
@@Snp2024 French was never majority population in Algérie française
@@jonseilim4321 concentration camps for uyghurs is not integrating. Forceful dismantling of turkic families, especially men from their children is a crime against basic human rights. I know people who fled. Don't think that it is a "greater good" for a glorious country.
US invades Afghanistan
Comment section: Fxxk Yehhhh
US leaves Afghanistan
Comment section: Oh good for them
China befriends Afghanistan
Comment section: Hey hey hey that's illegal.
Fascinating video. Keep up the good work.
It’s pronounced “Ürümchi”, not “Ouroumkwee”.
He's one of those people that just try to pronounce things perfectly then sound like a tool.
@@thatguywithnoglasses No no he's just Dutch 🇳🇱🇳🇱🇳🇱🇨🇼🇨🇼🇨🇼
@@Must_Do_Better Dutch 🇳🇱
Great videos mate ✌🏾✌🏾🔥
Anyone else think we'll never heard again about insurgencies as soon as "Terminator" like drones become available to protect the oil/mining fields of big business?
I love your work! Keep it going!
I would be cautious when a spider invites flies to the parlor for tea.
Who is the spider and who is the fly in this case?
@@user-6d4un3w7h I don't see China as "fly" but I do see the Taliban as spider pretty much.
@@LuisAldamiz the spider is china it should be obvious
@@encyclopaedia4853 - In that case they may have trapped something very dangerous, a scorpion rather than a mere fly.
Very informative video per usual. Keep up the good work 👍
Even Russia which occupied Afghanistan for ten years has an open Embassy. Both countries know the value of Afghans natural resources and the fact that 90% of Afghan wealth is held outside the country.
We live in a period.
Mario Stalin
True gamer words
Great video as always, just a heads up Ürümqi is pronounced like Ouroumchi in Uyghur.
good work bro,comment for the algo,keep it up
"...When religion and politics travel in the same cart, the riders believe nothing can stand in their way. Their movements become headlong - faster and faster and faster. They put aside all thoughts of obstacles and forget the precipice does not show itself to the man in a blind rush until it's too late....” Bene Gesseritt coda
"...It is more difficult to organize peace than to win a war; but the fruits of victory will be lost if the peace is not well organized..." Aristotle
Why not? China and Afghanistan share a common border.
Common poorly defined border in a remote mountain nobody lives even close to in the middle of Pamir. As good as no border, really.
Let's see. An ultra Islamic group allying with a government that send Muslims to concentration camps.
Yeah why shouldn't they ally? (Sarcasm)
@@HaventheDemoness-vy9lx Money talks at the end, Taliban already said they have no problems with China, Pakistan and china are allies which will make Afghanistan also an ally which will anger India as there close, Me as an Afghan also recognises the situation in China, but when ur country has been in war non stop for century, I think theres a time when enough is enough and make ur country developing nation rather than wage war on China when ur country is already doomed
Russia: 10 year visa.
USA: 20 year visa.
China: 30 year visa.
Who next?
🟠SERCH ADITYA RATHORE-HE ALSO MAKES INFORMATIVE CONTENT LIKE HISTORY WITH HILBORT
Is Pakistan next?
The new videos are cool but are you still doing history videos?
♦️SERCH ADITYA RATHORE-HE ALSO MAKES INFORMATIVE CONTENT LIKE HISTORY WITH HILBORT
Rare Earth Minerals, which Afghanistan is overflowing with. Also more Frontier in which to threaten India, to them being a Bonus.
Rare earth minerals, contrary to popular belief and the name, is in fact not rare at all. It's just never really concentrated enough, so much so that to mine it requires turning over a lot of materials and end up with a lot of polluting tailing.
If given no other options, "western countries" are perfectly capable of exploiting their own rare earth mineral deposits. They prefer to shit in other people's yards instead.
@@BicyclesMayUseFullLane
I mean yeah, pretty much every continent has a pretty respectable amount of every material needed to sustain a society for a long time, it’s just that superpowers love exploiting backwater nations in order to get it cheap it’s geopolitics 100
I mean, pakistan and Inda are natural enemies, China and India are natural enemies, Pakistan and Afghanistan are natural allies, therefore, the friends of the enemies of my enemies are my friends? Why not?
Not to mention the ancient knowledge that is kept all over the Middle East. Many Empires have spent millions of dollars and countless hours exploring the Middle East while looking for this knowledge. Hitler spent millions, along with tons of resources to try to find certain knowledge around Iraq and Afghantisan... which probably lead to the Germans having some of the best technology in the world at the time... Russia did it after them. There is something there that people are looking for. Some kind of knowledge and power.
@@nevets2371 that is very true
make video on malaysia crisis or colombia crisis pls
As always great stuff man, didnt know about china's support for the Talies.
Its interesting indeed how all of this is going to play out in geopolitics...no doubt if there is "fresh history" coming out of Afghanistan you will cover it. However i think its a healthy thing to keep a broad scope too...after all: All history matters😜
Keep up the good work,
Cheers🇳🇱
I really like these type of videos
If you want to know what's interesting; produce a video on the history of Ahmad Shah Massoud beyond what the packaged mainstream views on him have become
There is a great article on that from Afghaneye:
The Untold History of Ahmad Shah Massoud
Who was this guy? I'll have to look him up, sounds important
@@brandonblackfyre5783 CIA agent of the west and an opportunist just like his son right now, but he fled to france after Taliban entered panjshir and are looking for outsiders to help him in the civil war
@@shadowwhowalk I know bro but western Afghans don't believe it unless a white guy says it
@@ZyroAniCapped huh?
Ty for vid
9:33 China hasn't confirmed any plans on whether they will invest as generously as you've implied as far as I know, perhaps you could provide sources? More likely mining and infrastructure for those operations only
Afganistán is rich in ores, Chinese mining will definitely be a thing there.
China is already heavily invested in the BRI and will gain access to many more natural resources in that area.
Mining activities provide employment and revenue for Afghanistan
@@tonylee9363 "Iraqi's will have a job because of oil!" where have we heard that before?
@@Ragerian
Except China have no desire to bomb other countries, and they doesn't have a military industrial complex as the west.
what genre music does the Taliband play?
Can u not put gay background music in the videos?
Answer: to build a bigger army
Holding talks is not the same as an alliance, the US has also held talks with the Taliban.
what's the music on 2:20 please?
China's belt and road is the only thing that can cool the insanity of the Taliban. I hope everything works out for the sake of the Afghans
Yes, a corrupt, international bribe-fueled, debt strangling system is exactly what these countries and people need. For example, look at Pakistan selling out Uyghurs muslims, their brothers, to overlord China. Money rules all.
@@shadden_x the Pakistan GOVERNMENT sells out the Uyghurs, I know tons of Pakistanis who does not support the CCP
You should stop equating people with it’s government. By your logic if the CIA supported the Pol pot that means the US citizens also support pol pot and all his crimes
@@comradekenobi6908 I think it was pretty obvious he was referring to the government’s already, he didn’t equate it to the entire population
@@jcshy you can’t really be sure can you?
I’ve seen many people muddled government and civilians goals into one
@@shadden_x and what about the US. The same country that’s fine with Israel and their antics. The same country that invaded Iraq and Afghanistan. The same country who is fine with the Saudi’s and their actions in Yemen while also hurting Syria. Again using your logic, we can apply the same thinking to the IMF, whose loans literally have Pakistan on a noose and can entirely destroy the whole economy of Pakistan. Don’t those equate to a “debt strangling system”. At least the Chinese make sure to build infrastructure themselves but any corrupt politician can take out a loan and destroy the country subsequently, which is what happened to Pakistan. China isn’t a happy field of frolics but neither is the USA. And would you look at that the USA only yesterday did a “Surgical Strike” against a terrorist in Afghanistan only for it to be an aid worker being welcomed by 7 damn children. All dead for nothing but a hypocritical superpower.
hmm did the title of the video changed?
Sadly, this simply underlines how stupid America's policy has been: it should have made clear that it went into Afghanistan to neutralise Al Quaida, and not to remake Afghanistan in its own image: if it had done that and then got out and simply offered financial and other aid to Afghanistan, it would have benefited both Afghanistan and itself hugely. Now it will have to tread even more carefully with China.
Let us hope that America can see that both it and China have an interest in ensuring that Afghanistan does not again become a hotbed for terrorism, and negotiate with China on that basis, rather than simply seeing China as a threat.
We can but hope that there are sensible back-door talks of some sort going on between America and China: Anerica has strong leverage since it has Afghanistan's financial reserves: a partnership between China and Anerica to allow Afghanistan to rebuild itself and prosper would be by far the best way of ensuring that terrorist groups are not welcome in Afghanistan.
Does the American Government have the imagination and guts to do that?
Ultimately there's no possible negotiation between the USA and China: they are both top dogs of their respective blocs and they are doomed to fight each other until either collapses or a third power emerges.
@@LuisAldamiz for over a century France and Prussia/Germany had a similar idea, until the horror of World War II brought them to see that cooperation was better than war, and they formed the ECSC which essentially became the EU, and have been at peace for 70 years.
One can hope that America, like France and Germany then, having been defeated in Afghanistan, has the sense to realise it has to at least try to work with, rather than against, China to stabilise the area: China, being Afghanistan's neighbour, must already know that, so, given careful diplomacy, America could find itself kicking at an open door-China probably faces some economic turbulence with its attempt to bring its overheated property market under control, so could easily welcome an initiative which allowed America to release Afghanistan's reserves, thereby putting less strain on China's economy: imagination is what we need; not fresh hostilities, even diplomatic ones.
@@rogerdines6244 if you think China is going to have any mercy on the US you're likely mistaken.
@@rogerdines6244 - But that's not global competition anymore: Europe was not anymore top dog in global affairs after WWII (unless you count the USSR as such). If there were any doubts they were dispelled in the Suez Crisis a few years later.
The EU and also its rival model, the EFTA, were made to organized US vassals in more efficient ways and prevent conflicts among them. Europe was pretty much finished in the 50s and could only operate as vassals (plural) of the leading superpowers: USA and USSR (now USA and China).
@@rogerdines6244 - You have to read Lenin's work on "Imperialism", it's about the best he ever wrote. He uses the classical case of Britain and Portugal to explain how can a capitalist and imperialist country become subservient of another. But that also means that ultimately only two top dogs can co-exist and they do so in terms of total rivalry.
This is of course in capitalist conditions, which are intrinsically competitive. It's possible that it may be different in socialist conditons but China is not anymore socialist and is not at all interested in socialism.
Bolshevik model systems ultimately just used socialism (in Fordist global conditions) to promote national growth and proto-capitalist autonomous development, totally not the original idea of socialism/communism but that's what actually happened.
Could you do a video on the Sinai Insurgency?
China has been around a long time, and has survived historical events that some civilizations have never recovered from. It would be wise not to underestimate them.
No kidding. Their culture is, and to my knowledge always has been, very hierarchically ordered. Communism was somehow an appropriate fit. I'd take it over Stalinism, for sure.
@@sandeman1776 Commmunism technically doesn't have an hierarchy. Also, no government ever existed without a hierarchy buddy.
@@lolasdm6959 maybe bureaucracy would have been a better term to use in China's case. Of course, there is a hierarchy in every government, because there has never been a governmental body that is a pure form of one system or another. Any system of government, Communism included, has to have someone run it. I think bureaucracy stands in for hierarchy in this case.
Which china? the culture? people? government? lmao Rome the city exists doesn't mean its full of romans or their culture. :')
Are you talking about China as a civilization or states? Because their states have fallen repeatedly, and they've had several civil war / warring states periods.
As for civilizations, there's been plenty of civilizations that stood 3000 to 1000 years long. I wouldn't really single out China for praise in this context.
Thank you again
If the taliban got a taste of their own medicine and gets dragged into a conflict with guerilla fighters...
MMMM that would be sweet tasting
Most likely its happening already against isis-k
@@hopeleslydevoted6170
ISK isn't going to be as much of a threat as ISIS given it is squashed between Pakistan and Afghanistan (Taliban).
Northern Alliance
Way off topic, but your thumbnail makes me think Sutton Whooo. Great video keep it up my man.
🟦SERCH ADITYA RATHORE-HE ALSO MAKES INFORMATIVE CONTENT LIKE HISTORY WITH HILBORT
For the GLA
I see your a man of culture
*May i have some shoes?*
Thanks man
You mispronounced Al-Qaeda
Why play N click clack background music?
Why the hell are the chapters in this video labeled as "Chinese-Taliban relations", "The Uygur situation", "The tough situation", and "The choice?"
You haven’t linked the CaspianReport video in the description yet bro
Ok did you just call the Uyghurs(weegur) the (oigur)
Don‘t forget he is dutch.
In German ( similar language) they are called „Uiguren“, so probably this is their dutch name
Your a accurate historian, I appreciate that.
Alright boys and girls, russia tried it, American tried it, let's go!!!! Three for three your turn China 👀🤣
China has no desire to expand its border to include Afghanistan like the Soviet Union or change the country to reflect Western values like NATO. They are only about business and will not interfere in Afghans internal affairs as long as the Taliban don't aid others to interfere in China's internal affairs.
@@guardianoffire8814 OK chinese bot
@@DanielAtHome1 Nope. Not a Bot. The world doesn't buy into the Western saviour nonsense promoted by Western govts and NGOs. The world has become a worse place due to the endless stupid actions of Western govts regardless of party that have wasted taxes on military adventurism abroad for the interest of the few wealthy disguised as geostrategic national interests.
@@guardianoffire8814 lmao, definitely a bot
This is pretty obvious.
"Hey Taliban?"
"Yah?"
"Wanna join the "Fuck America" club?"
"The only thing that binds [The US, Britain and the USSR] together is our hatred of the Nazis, and hate really isn't the best foundation for a relationship."
-Winston Churchill, 1945
Keep china in Afghanistan for long enough, let them do the same operations they do in Africa and Latin America then eventually the people will resent them and possibly rebel. I sense china in the next few decades will create their own Afghanistan war.
5:27 I'm sorry what???? 😂😂😂😂
This alliance contradicts everything they stand for. I don’t imagine it will work it’s easier to just say words.
yea
US and Saudi Arabia...... No one thought that would work but here we are.
@Ashhhadic Century the Taliban is a Pashtun majority ruling over a multiethnic states (pashtuns, hazari, Uzbeks, tajiks and very few uighurs). Supporting the Uighurs may result in them losing power.
They stand for making business. And that's real capitalism to you, kid.
@@icysaracen3054 Therefore that’s why you will see more low ranking Taliban members defecting a lot as they don’t have power to lose anyways. Uyghur problem isn’t going no where as it’s already rooted and things like IS k too.
"xinjiang" is occupied east turkestan
dude its not pronounced al khida that sounds so stupid. Its al - kaa - ida meaning the base in Arabic.
How Hilbert doesn't get a Webby should be the next one.
What about extremist hindus in india
I recently became aware of India’s hardliners and i find this particular concerning as they are a nuclear power.
Hindudva literally means extremist Hindu while Taliban means students lol irony
@@KingshukMonsur I'd hope the Hindutva isn't chopping off "infedels" heads.
@@Frederick.J.Marshall Pakistan is a nuclear country and Pakistan is the breeding ground for Islamic extremism in Afghanistan
Afghanistan is going to be rich asf
It's interesting to see how strong a devout leaders faith is when tested with money. The Taliban as well as every single other self-proclaimed champions of Islam not only turn a blind eye, but even form alliances with someone who is actively carrying out the persecution of over 1.5 Muslims in China...
"The Qur’an (4:75) allows the use of force for defending other Muslims who are oppressed and are unable to defend themselves: ‘what has happened to you that you do not fight in the way of Allah and for the oppressed among men, women and children’. Here we find a different meaning. Whilst verse 22:39 allows the use of force in self-defence, verse 4:75 permits the use of force in the defence of those who are persecuted for believing in Islam and are unable to defend themselves. The threshold for using force in the defence of oppressed and weak Muslims is that the oppression suffered must be so severe as to compel Muslims to leave their homes, for instance, genocide or torture."
Hmmm, sounds sort of like what China has done and is still doing to Uyghur Muslims in China...
" [Islamic] justice.’38 ‘Islam is not a party of preachers and missionaries but rather of divine enforcers. Its mission is to blot out, by force if necessary, oppression, moral anarchy, social disorder and exploitation … and replace evil with good. "
Perhaps that don't apply to those who are giving you money?...
Praise to Allah! ...
Unless ofcourse you pay me.
👳👳♀️🧕🙏 + 🇨🇳💵 = 🙈🙉🙊
Then why were they best friends with USA against the Soviet Union?
@@goldengold8568 you're helping make my case not hurt it. That just further proves that they will sell their faith.
It's probably because China isn't actually persecuting 1.5 Uighurs, that it is a Western lie.
@@koikat3708 it is time to get off Internationale internet and back to ccp internet, you are not allowed here.
Well it is also written Doomed are they who change Scripture for their own needs.
As an American who is angry and confused that my government would abandon the Afghan people, your history of Afghanistan has helped me understand the situation.
🔴SERCH ADITYA RATHORE-HE ALSO MAKES INFORMATIVE CONTENT LIKE HISTORY WITH HILBORT
I recommend to watch this for better understanding
ua-cam.com/video/3bRvpPUve00/v-deo.html
What alliance? Simply talking and working with them doesn’t mean an alliance.
This is an amateur commentary with fancy graphics
Good try joe piss pants biden
Agreed. He's been really jumping the gun with these videos lately. Is it just to race to get views? Going off too many assumptions and hearsay before they've even developed yet into anything meaningful, just like the Panjshir rebellion.
The US didn't leave Afghanistan and push out the Soviets before that, just for China to grab the country. Likewise, the IEA/Taliban aren't going to let China do that either. The IEA has asked _all_ its neighbors to invest in Afghanistan, not just China. And its just a fact of reality that any country-especially third-world countries-are going to be trading with China with a lot of manufacturing coming from there anyways.
This video alone deserve a subscribe. Chinese involvement in a lot areas of the world is unknown but important.
It's prob going to be a investment trap.
You and your anti Chinese conspiracy,
Also these guys are the Taliban, do you really think a Debt Trap would work against them?
@@bosunbill9059 No, but China will think it'll work.
@@Samm815
Look, if a dimwit like me on UA-cam knew it doesn't work, do you really think the PRC doesn't know this fact either?
debt trap? that's not gonna work, on international level you can just default all your debt, what they gonna do? invade Afghanistan?
It only a matter of time before China finds a old map with fresh ink saying that Afghanistan belongs to China since ancient times.
The West and India hopes to use the Uighurs to launch Islamic terror attacks on China, but China got ahead of the game and now is in position now counter by directing Islamic extremists back against the West. Two can play at this game.
Except the Taliban in Pakistan are still fighting the government there. And they still have significant link to the Taliban in Afghanistan and Al queida. I wouldn't so sure how this works in the long run
Wtf india have to do with it don't drag us in shitstorm you guys created
@@youngking2503 lol,Pakistan's Taliban is on the brink of collapse,after Pak army launched operation Zarb e Azm it curse Pakistani Taliban and now they struggle to keep control of even half of a district!
Damn USA went out China went in
There are two kinds of history UA-camr's: the one's that are shit at pronouncing foreign names and don't care much, and then there's Hilbert and others who try too hard and nail some but butcher others 🙊
Okay so?
It must be mentioned that the Taliban was partly created by the Pakistani Intelligence Service, the ISI in 1994. While it did have some Mujahideen fighters it wasn't Mujahideen. The American backed Northern Alliance was mostly former Mujahideen as was several of the anti Taliban Insurgencies.
CCP: "We do not interfere in the internal affairs of other countries"
also CCP: invites Taliban to Tianjin, welcoming them with open arms, while the Afghan government still sits in Kabul.
Yes do you know the US negotiated with the Taliban in Kashgar, China.
Exellent video, but just one thing Al-Qaeda is pronounced Al-Kaeda, not Al-Khaeda ^^
Cringe alliance
The real cringe alliance was the US/globalists and the corrupt, drug dealing, boy diddling Afghan government.
@@jakemocci3953 I mean world is big no scarcity of cringe and stupidity so yeah
There is no alliance, alliance implies a common eneny. Now that US is out of Afghanistan, Taliban really have no reason (or the means) to attack United States. And China don't do alliances in general.
Current Affairs with Hilbert because his new sponsor is a news app
Thank you. We can only hope that China will have a moderating effect on the future policies in Afghanistan.
No China doesn't care about what happens in a foreign nation as long as Chinese investments are not attacked. And even then, China would just pull out and look elsewhere.
Was it necessary to add punjabi bhangra music in the video?
*Investing in crypto now should be in every wise individuals list, in some months time you'll be ecstatic with the decision you made today.*
Most intelligent words I've heard.
Crypto is the new gold
I wanted to trade Crypto but got discouraged by the fluctuations in price
@@kingstonleo2429 That won't bother you if you trade with a professional like Mr Jayden mason.
I heard that his strategies are really good
Does China have any ancient maps that shows that Afghanistan once belonged to them?
nope
Caspian report is an awesome channel
Bro youre still talking about panjshir when it's fully taken
🔹SERCH ADITYA RATHORE-HE ALSO MAKES INFORMATIVE CONTENT LIKE HISTORY WITH HILBORT
Shortest civil war 😂😂😂 ever
Ah yes. So short. 20 years.
5:12 I DIED when I heard the Armored Skeptic Music
🟨SERCH ADITYA RATHORE-HE ALSO MAKES INFORMATIVE CONTENT LIKE HISTORY WITH HILBORT
@@natashagupta4691 the fuq?
@@ChronicAndIronic bro serch Aditya Rathore he is very good journalist
Apropos of nothing, that background music 🎶 is also used by @SecureTeam10 .
Just like that, US/UK allies betrayed all Afghan allies, and China took control without fighting.