The REAL Truth Behind 'Chemtrails'

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 10 гру 2024

КОМЕНТАРІ • 9 тис.

  • @jamesthomas1244
    @jamesthomas1244 8 років тому +1114

    All I know - as a rational human-being who spends a lot of time in nature - is that myself and others have noticed that on a clear and brilliant blue-sky morning that high altitude jets flying in discernible patterns leave trails that dissipate and turn the entire - once blue - sky into grey. I have seen it hundreds of times. It's obvious these unnatural cloud dispersions must cause some change in the weather. Yet you never hear about it. No one talks about what happens when a blue sky turns grey. What are the scientific environmental ramifications? The government and TYT just says: nothing here, move along -- don't believe your eyes.
    As a past hang-glider owner, bird watcher, and nature lover, i can give witness to the fact that this greying of the skies by aircraft is a fairly recent phenomena. One, that the authorities deny and want you to ignore.
    I don't know what the hell is going on. But I do know what I see, and I know there is an effort made to make me think i don't see.

    • @dsm6678
      @dsm6678 3 роки тому +88

      Yes, I see it also

    • @israelmena7752
      @israelmena7752 2 роки тому +77

      Blue clear skies this morning and noticed dozens of planes in the morning leaving huge dispersion of trails and now this afternoon it's cloudy and no sun when yesterday it was gonna be sunny into the weekend

    • @victorm6176
      @victorm6176 2 роки тому

      I agree all this is evil please leave a beatiful sunnyday alone and not ruin it with full of unatural clouds God jnows what is in this chemtrails probably bad chemtrails full of harm chemicals.

    • @newlycreated1864
      @newlycreated1864 2 роки тому

      We see it as well. Usually they cover the sky the day before rain is in the forecast. We've been lied to a lot, and when they don't want you to know or dig for the truth they label it a "conspiracy theory." For example the Bible says the earth is immovable. The Bible says Joshua commanded the sun to stand still, not the earth. Yet, in the Beast education system we are taught the earth is spinning at 1,000mph, while revolving around the sun at 66,600 mph, while our whole solar system is shooting through the universe at almost a half million mph. We are taught the earth is a sphere, but pilots get to a certain altitude and fly level until they reach their destination. They don't keep dipping down to account for the curvature of the earth, so they don't fly off into space. They would have to take into account the spinning, revolving and shooting at 1,000, 66,600, and half a million mph, but they don't. It would be impossible to land safely if the earth was spinning a fast as a speeding bullet. Yet, people love to believe the lies that were etched in their minds since that first day of school. Telling people lies, before they get the chance to observe, ponder, question, and think. Why do we believe what we believe? How would anyone be able to measure a sun that's supposedly 93, 000,000 miles away? Do we believe lies because we believe the lie that people are "smarter" than us, and they know better, so we should just believe it and never question? Question everything. Why wouldn't they want us to know the truth? The greatest deception was when Satan got Eve and Adam to question what God said. The truth is in the Bible, but people ignore it, because it doesn't match what they learned in school. They Question the actual truth, while believing lies. It's more comfortable to believe the lies of the Beast matrix system. Could God flood a globe? Does water curve, or does it level out? Why has no one been allowed to explore Antarctica since the 1950s? Where are the ends of the earth, The Bible speaks of, on a globe? Where are the 4 corners of the earth, The Bible speaks of, on a globe?

    • @newlycreated1864
      @newlycreated1864 2 роки тому +19

      @Jack Snow your eyes can only see so far. Ever hear the term "vanishing point?" Go out and watch a boat "disappear" over the horizon, then bring that same boat back to your vision with a high powered lens. The earth is flat, and when Jesus returns every eye will see Him, just like He said-- that's not possible on a giant testicle.

  • @paulolson3983
    @paulolson3983 11 місяців тому +92

    This guy will tell you that the clot shot is safe and effective.

    • @rockridgefigsandfruitfores7374
      @rockridgefigsandfruitfores7374 5 місяців тому +10

      He sounds Vaccinated!

    • @aweaustraliawrestlingenter6593
      @aweaustraliawrestlingenter6593 Місяць тому

      Your that intelligent you think its a clot shot still.😅😅😅😅move on from the pathetic bullshit conspiracy garbage 😅😅😅

    • @aweaustraliawrestlingenter6593
      @aweaustraliawrestlingenter6593 Місяць тому

      ​@@rockridgefigsandfruitfores7374is that your level of intellectual prowess is it.😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅

    • @markclare3954
      @markclare3954 25 днів тому

      You pathetic dumb fucks still out there with your no facts bullshit are you. Put some facts up idiot. 😅😅😅😅

  • @chrisavalon9926
    @chrisavalon9926 8 років тому +387

    He thinks if he keeps repeating "without any evidence" over and over it will be true

    • @newlycreated1864
      @newlycreated1864 2 роки тому +2

      @Divine Truth1 do you have a good documentary on this subject?

    • @newlycreated1864
      @newlycreated1864 2 роки тому

      @Divine Truth1 okay, I'll check it out. I have an idea of where to go.

    • @newlycreated1864
      @newlycreated1864 2 роки тому +1

      @Divine Truth1 Thank you! It worked in about 3 hours.

    • @tamaralockhart4831
      @tamaralockhart4831 2 роки тому

      @@newlycreated1864
      ua-cam.com/video/Mwhwvdcd6VI/v-deo.html

    • @tamaralockhart4831
      @tamaralockhart4831 2 роки тому

      @Divine Truth1
      ua-cam.com/video/Mwhwvdcd6VI/v-deo.html

  • @headrips
    @headrips Рік тому +133

    You didn't see a sky like that in the 80s and 90s. Explain that !! Wake up

    • @siouxperb5570
      @siouxperb5570 Рік тому +9

      Exponential increase in air traffic to the tune of a more than one THOUSAND percent increase in passenger revenue miles, coupled with an industry wide shift away from turbojet powerplants in favor of high bypass turbofans.
      The contrails have always been there, for nearly 100 years. There's just a lot more now.
      You're welcome.

    • @spillanegottleib1681
      @spillanegottleib1681 7 місяців тому

      @@siouxperb5570 Incorrect. You're stupid.

    • @sachadee.6104
      @sachadee.6104 7 місяців тому +5

      MORE PLANES in the skies now.

    • @flavio7180
      @flavio7180 6 місяців тому +5

      Lies again, chemmie. Plenty of photos out there that anyone can look up.

    • @paulscism2338
      @paulscism2338 6 місяців тому +2

      You where not looking that was there since I was a kid in the 80s

  • @64CadDeville
    @64CadDeville 8 років тому +311

    CORRECTION: *They are spraying chemicals*

    • @ratuadilFF
      @ratuadilFF 3 роки тому

      Ini

    • @tamaralockhart4831
      @tamaralockhart4831 2 роки тому

      ua-cam.com/video/Mwhwvdcd6VI/v-deo.html

    • @JailEnforcement
      @JailEnforcement 2 роки тому +4

      Exactly"

    • @tamaralockhart4831
      @tamaralockhart4831 2 роки тому +9

      @@JailEnforcement
      Exactly is correct. Chemtrails are not contrails.

    • @elyjahstark
      @elyjahstark 2 роки тому +3

      @@tamaralockhart4831 Yes, contrails exist. Chemtrails are the misidentification of persistent contrails

  • @pattineal7375
    @pattineal7375 7 років тому +133

    There is a difference between contrails and chemtrails. Contrails vanish after a short while. Chemtrails, on the other hand, hang there for miles and miles and spread out, eventually turning into light cloud cover.

    • @NEXENgames
      @NEXENgames 4 роки тому

      @asrgaqgq sdfgsdgsdfgsdg Look up!
      I just saw 2 planes - 1 with normal trail other 1 produced a total weird cloud that now is smeared over the sky. How come we see two totally different behaiviour if both are the same?
      Only 2 possible explanation are:
      A) they are chemically different trails
      or
      B) the flew in other heights with strong differences in preasure and wind.

    • @texasray5237
      @texasray5237 Рік тому +5

      It's a cloud in the sense of a dust cloud.
      Not a cloud of water droplets.

    • @AdventuresnTyland
      @AdventuresnTyland 9 місяців тому

      And if you watch the planes they in an arching motion@@texasray5237

    • @okedoke1234
      @okedoke1234 9 місяців тому

      Show me the data on this. Until you do, all you appear to be doing is spewing "chemtrails" out of your ass.

    • @MarshallDTeach533
      @MarshallDTeach533 8 місяців тому

      @@okedoke1234Your ignorance is spewing out of that Cognitive dissonance half brain you have left that is Fried. Why don’t you go research it yourself you lazy mouth feeder. Bet you’re one of the clowns that took the vaccine.

  • @Urhoboman5
    @Urhoboman5 8 років тому +214

    Sorry John you're wrong.
    1. They linger at very low altitude for planes. 5,000 to about 12,000 feet.
    2. They last hours. Normal ones go from 5 to 30 seconds before dissipating.
    3. They don't appear to be coming from the engine upon reviewing magnified photos/videos.
    4. High amounts of certain metals in ground water and soil. Metals that shouldn't be there.
    I could go on.

    • @CHRISTSPIRACY.comJESUSwasVegan
      @CHRISTSPIRACY.comJESUSwasVegan 8 років тому +32

      they are also not on normal flight paths etc.. how anyone can say these grids are normal is beyond me

    • @gentrywalker
      @gentrywalker 8 років тому +17

      Why should anybody believe you?

    • @morodaye1417
      @morodaye1417 8 років тому +30

      Yeah, no. Chemtrails are nonsense.

    • @CHRISTSPIRACY.comJESUSwasVegan
      @CHRISTSPIRACY.comJESUSwasVegan 8 років тому +8

      dont believe anything without researching. do your homework, fools

    • @gentrywalker
      @gentrywalker 8 років тому +17

      beedy bum Have you, at any point, followed your own advice?

  • @brucejemcek6986
    @brucejemcek6986 Рік тому +107

    Contrails disappear. Chemtrails linger and expand.

    • @siouxperb5570
      @siouxperb5570 Рік тому +2

      Name any substance, element, or compound OTHER THAN WATER that will do what you're claiming to make your 'chemtrail' hoax reality. Let's hear it.

    • @siouxperb5570
      @siouxperb5570 Рік тому

      @@alostmarble3358 because water is the only matter that will behave as such, proving that the idiotic 'chemtrail' hoax is nothing but contrails.

    • @okedoke1234
      @okedoke1234 7 місяців тому

      @@siouxperb5570 you have got the famous and tried and true chemtrailer “just look up” explanation…..

    • @sachadee.6104
      @sachadee.6104 7 місяців тому +2

      nope. Depends on the conditions.

    • @flavio7180
      @flavio7180 7 місяців тому

      Typical lies from deranged chemmie whackjobs🤣.

  • @jambandbillyd
    @jambandbillyd 8 років тому +222

    Any extremely small amount of respect I had for TYT just vanished in a contrail.

    • @davidburrows4801
      @davidburrows4801 2 роки тому +6

      And Joe rogan

    • @thosethatsee
      @thosethatsee 2 роки тому +1

      Thank you

    • @thosethatsee
      @thosethatsee 2 роки тому

      Real eyes realize real lies. TYT sellout gate keeper Skidmark shit stains

    • @samsimons5609
      @samsimons5609 2 роки тому

      Use white vinegar the vapours destr especially when u heat it ipoy scumtrails

    • @thosethatsee
      @thosethatsee 2 роки тому

      @@samsimons5609 really? I’ll check out

  • @GRAHAM2109
    @GRAHAM2109 2 роки тому +171

    Plenty of evidence that these are chemtrails and NOT contrails

    • @siouxperb5570
      @siouxperb5570 2 роки тому

      There is 100% PROOF positive that they are all contrails, and that 'chemtrails' are 100% mathematically impossible. Seems you lose.

    • @okedoke1234
      @okedoke1234 9 місяців тому +3

      Oh, do continue please! Show me your evidence.

    • @eliotvarda
      @eliotvarda 8 місяців тому +7

      ​@@okedoke1234 I will do something better, a lil cartoon story, once upon a time a chicken in the slaughter house told other chickens: THEY ARE SLAUGHTERING US HERE, other chickens laughted at that chicken and said: YOU ARE A CONSPIRACY THEORIST 😊 hope you liked the story, it tells you a lot

    • @irod642
      @irod642 7 місяців тому

      Pleas show it to us

    • @okedoke1234
      @okedoke1234 7 місяців тому

      @@eliotvarda Got an even better one….one day GRAHAM2109 told us there was “plenty of evidence”….LOLOL

  • @texmex8382
    @texmex8382 6 років тому +139

    The young turks would sell out all of humanity for one shiny nickel.

  • @kevinsheldrick917
    @kevinsheldrick917 Рік тому +67

    I like the way they have a picture of it up for the entire segment while he talks about how it doesn't exist.

    • @RS54321
      @RS54321 Рік тому +8

      That's gaslighting, for ya!

    • @siouxperb5570
      @siouxperb5570 Рік тому +1

      Yes, a photo of contrails does what, exactly, to make you think that they are the mathematically impossible 'chemtrail' hoax? Do you not understand contrails?

    • @kevinsheldrick917
      @kevinsheldrick917 Рік тому +6

      @@siouxperb5570 The picture probably looks reasonable to someone who responds to the idea of "Would you like to get several toxic injections and put a mask on your face to cut off your oxygen?" with "Yes! Using all the intelligence that I've accumulated over my lifetime, that sounds brilliant!"

    • @siouxperb5570
      @siouxperb5570 Рік тому

      @@kevinsheldrick917 Maybe it looks reasonable to someone who has spent their entire career as a professional pilot who understands contrail formation, persistence, atmospheric saturation, and the laws of physics. Did THAT ever occur to you? Hmm?

    • @smokeythewizard8199
      @smokeythewizard8199 11 місяців тому +5

      ​@@siouxperb5570you still trolling dude... Leave the adults to discuss matters of our health and safety, you go sit at the kids table now with all the other trolls.

  • @59Love1
    @59Love1 5 років тому +123

    I'm a professional driver I drive across North America every week years ago I use to see this chemtrails once or twice a year being sprayed now I see it every time there is a clear blue sky its very disturbing to me that this goes on say bye -bye to blue sky

    • @zhannalicious
      @zhannalicious 3 роки тому +5

      EXACTLY!!!

    • @eileentaylor25
      @eileentaylor25 2 роки тому

      Truth is they are still spraying us today and manipulating our weather to say its climate change!.
      Geo engendering in a nut shell!.

    • @gaiasgrowinggarden8603
      @gaiasgrowinggarden8603 Рік тому +1

      Build cloud busters! They work and there very powerful

    • @gaiasgrowinggarden8603
      @gaiasgrowinggarden8603 Рік тому +1

      Do not touch the copper piping

  • @HumintHub
    @HumintHub 5 років тому +179

    aluminum, strontium and barium ...is actually what's sprayed < "geo engineering".

  • @thehonkening1
    @thehonkening1 8 років тому +86

    the fact that he keeps saying people believe in this theory "without any evidence" just shows that they are dismissing everything people are concerned about. There is a mountain of very real evidence you are throwing out the window.

    • @richardhorn7688
      @richardhorn7688 2 роки тому

      I am Richard and I’m from the future. The government admits it now and says that it’s been going on since 2008. But it’s GOOD

    • @thehonkening1
      @thehonkening1 2 роки тому

      @@richardhorn7688 "but it's GOOD" oh well thank God!

    • @samsimons5609
      @samsimons5609 2 роки тому

      White vinegar vapours destroy chem trails the acetic acid eats the heavy metals and wipes them out, i use it and it works especially when u heat it up,

    • @elyjahstark
      @elyjahstark 2 роки тому +2

      If there is a mountain of evidence, why can’t anyone seem to find any of that relevant evidence to defend their claims? And how do you reconcile the fact that your claims contradict the laws of physics?

    • @time2see192
      @time2see192 2 роки тому

      @@elyjahstark There you are again...trolling? Or do you actually briefcase the is no evidence? Dane Wiggington has all the evidence your little brain process, and he is showing and sharing it every place and every chance he gets. Now you can stop saying there is no evidence. Also, these chemtrails DO NOT contradict the law of physics, they uphold it. Scientifically.

  • @Theresa1057
    @Theresa1057 Рік тому +143

    They filled our sky up with these today, each line goes into a real cloud, I’m so tired of this! They gave no right to do this

    • @rohaynibent8599
      @rohaynibent8599 Рік тому +9

      It happened a lot this week in Jamaica and then it started raining

    • @yesyes-om1po
      @yesyes-om1po Рік тому +1

      lol they can't control it, its just what happens when a jet engine is at high altitudes. The phenomenon occurs in fighter jets which is very bad for the fighter jet's stealth, so clearly they can't pick whether they form or not. The reason jets fly at such high altitudes to begin with is because of the weaker gravity/air drag which allows the plane to fly faster and more efficiently. If they flew lower they'd go slower, burn more fuel, and whatever chemical the jet engines give off would still be there, it just wouldn't be visible.

    • @rohaynibent8599
      @rohaynibent8599 Рік тому

      @@yesyes-om1po as someone who spends a lot of times outdoors I can tell the difference. there are videos on UA-cam of people who fly these planes explaining that’s it’s called cloud seeding and that they “seed” the clouds to produce more rain. Link of a few videos are down below
      ua-cam.com/video/bU4z8ZiX_eA/v-deo.html
      ua-cam.com/video/PbWKHKZYT5c/v-deo.html

    • @CtCiscy
      @CtCiscy Рік тому +2

      It’s not just planes tho. Sure they contribute but a small amount compared to polutors like cars and industry. The darkness in the sky is likely caused by general pollution instead of directly planes

    • @tb4608
      @tb4608 Рік тому +2

      @@rohaynibent8599 today in the netherlands as well

  • @NEXENgames
    @NEXENgames 4 роки тому +44

    When ever government/politicians/"experts"/massmedia tell me anything I imidiatly fear that the total opposite is true.
    Sadly very often i am not wrong with that asumtion.

    • @siouxperb5570
      @siouxperb5570 4 роки тому +3

      Fortunately, the government/politicians/massmedia have never commented upon contrails, nor addressed the goofy conspiracy of the 'chemtrail' hoax, so there is nothing to believe from that source. Science and math are fully 100% correct in this case, so no need to get any of the flawed opinions above in to confuse the issue. 'Chemtrails' are 100% mathematically impossible. Contrails, however, are very real.

    • @mahatmaniggandhi2898
      @mahatmaniggandhi2898 Рік тому

      @@siouxperb5570 i would personally be happy if they were trying to control the population

    • @delray1953
      @delray1953 9 місяців тому

      Een waslijst aan patenten voor weather modification, waaronder tal van sproei systemen voor vliegtuigen.
      H.A.A.R.P. staat er uiteraard ook tussen.
      Vooral chemtrails blijven ontkennen, beste main stream believers.
      Weather Modification Patents
      YEAR - PATENT NUMBER - PATENT NAME
      1891 - US462795A - method of producing rain-fall
      1914 - US1103490A - rain maker (balloon images)
      1917 - US1225521A - protection from poisonous gas in warfare
      1920 - US1338343A - process and apparatus for the production of intense artificial clouds, fogs, or mists
      1924 - US1512783A - composition for dispelling fogs
      1927 - US1619183A - process of producing smoke clouds from moving aircraft
      1928 - US1665267A - process of producing artificial fogs
      1932 - US1892132A - atomizing attachment for airplane engine exhausts
      1933 - US1928963A - electrical system and method (for spraying chemtrails)
      1934 - US1957075A - airplane spray equipment
      1936 - US2045865A - skywriting apparatus
      1936 - US2052626A - method of dispelling fog (mit)
      1937 - US2068987A - process of dissipating fog
      1939 - US2160900A - method for vapor clearing
      1941 - US2232728A - method and composition for dispelling vapors
      1941 - US2257360A - desensitized pentaerythritol tetranitrate explosive
      1946 - US2395827A - airplane spray unit (us. dept. of agriculture)
      1946 - US2409201A - smoke-producing mixture
      1949 - US2476171A - smoke screen generator
      1949 - US2480967A - aerial discharge device
      1950 - US2527230A - method of crystal formation and precipitation
      1951 - US2550324A - process for controlling weather
      1951 - US2570867A - method of crystal formation and precipitation (general electric)
      1952 - US2582678A - material disseminating apparatus for aeroplanes
      1952 - US2591988A - production of tio2 pigments (DuPont)
      1952 - US2614083A - metal chloride screening smoke mixture
      1953 - US2633455A - smoke generator
      1954 - US2688069A - steam generator
      1955 - US2721495A - method and apparatus for detecting minute crystal forming particles suspended in a gaseous atmosphere (general electric)
      1956 - US2730402A - controllable dispersal device
      1957 - US2801322A - decomposition chamber for monopropellant fuel
      1958 - US2835530A - process for the condensation of atmospheric humidity and dissolution of fog
      1959 - US2881335A - generation of electrical fields (haarp - for re-charging clouds!)
      1959 - US2903188A - control of tropical cyclone formation
      1959 - US2908442A - method for dispersing natural atmospheric fogs and clouds
      1960 - US2962450A - fog dispelling composition (see references)
      1960 - US2963975A - cloud seeding carbon dioxide bullet
      1961 - US2986360A - aerial insecticide dusting device
      1962 - US3044911A - propellant system
      1962 - US3056556A - method of artificially influencing the weather
      1964 - US3120459A - composite incendiary powder containing metal coated oxidizing salts
      1964 - US3126155A - silver iodide cloud seeding generator (main commercial ingredient)
      1964 - US3127107A - generation of ice-nucleating crystals
      1964 - US3131131A - electrostatic mixing in microbial conversions
      1965 - US3174150A - self-focusing antenna system (haarp)
      1966 - US3257801A - pyrotechnic composition comprising solid oxidizer, boron and aluminium additive and binder
      1966 - US3234357A - electrically heated smoke producing device
      1966 - US3274035A - metallic composition for production of hygroscopic smoke
      1967 - US3300721A - means for communication through a layer of ionized gases (haarp)
      1967 - US3313487A - cloud seeding apparatus
      1967 - US3338476A - a heating device for use with aerosol containers
      1968 - US3410489A - automatically adjustable airfoil spray system with pump
      1969 - US3429507A - rainmaker
      1969 - US3430533A - aircraft dispenser pod having self-sealing ejection tubes
      1969 - US3432208A - fluidized particle dispenser (us air force)
      1969 - US3437502A - titanium dioxide pigment coated with silica and aluminium (DuPont)
      1969 - US3441214A - method and apparatus for seeding clouds
      2001 -US20030085296A1 - Hurricane and tornado control device
      Courtesy of Inky Bailey

    • @josephbusuttil3030
      @josephbusuttil3030 5 місяців тому

      @@siouxperb5570 "You actually Believe all that Bullshit You just Said ?" .... Will Smith INDEPENDANCE DAY

  • @Holly12245
    @Holly12245 Рік тому +29

    REAL contrails diminish after just a few seconds. They do not stay in the sky for hours at a time like these do. Growing up and all my life up until a couple years ago I’ve never seen all these lines in the sky. Why would they just start popping up out of nowhere and being seen after never being seen before, if it was normal?

    • @siouxperb5570
      @siouxperb5570 Рік тому

      "REAL contrails diminish after just a few seconds"
      Explain why you believe that false statement.
      "They do not stay in the sky for hours at a time like these do"
      Why not?
      "Growing up and all my life up until a couple years ago I’ve never seen all these lines in the sky.'
      But, they were most certainly there. That you didn't notice them until you got sucked in by the 'chemtrail' hoax is on you, and no one else.
      "Why would they just start popping up out of nowhere and being seen after never being seen before, if it was normal?"
      Persistent contrails have been an undisputed, documented, uncontested fact in the skies for nearly 100 years. This is a matter of public record, and is not open to debate. Where have you been?

    • @sachadee.6104
      @sachadee.6104 7 місяців тому

      nope. not true. Condensation can linger and spread depending on humidity and some other conditions. (plenty of explanatory video's on that).

    • @TiffASUgrad
      @TiffASUgrad 2 місяці тому

      Contrails vs. Chemtrails = distraction

  • @m.j.973
    @m.j.973 4 роки тому +33

    Why did UA-cam take down the videos of the Air Force Whistle-blower? She provided proof of Chem-tails while working as the one who was responsible for accepting the Chemical shipments at her AF Base. Those shipments were disguised as something else until they were loaded on the AF Jets that first started the Trails years ago.

    • @siouxperb5570
      @siouxperb5570 4 роки тому +1

      Kristen Meghan can still be found all over youtube, and her bullshit claims that fool the blind sheep still suck in many gullible people. Do you find it interesting that SHE HERSELF does not claim to be a 'chemtrail' whistle blower? That's how gullible you people are.

    • @m.j.973
      @m.j.973 3 роки тому +11

      @@siouxperb5570 So,, you don't know the difference between a Con Trail & a Chem Trail? Check the Science with water tested Lakes & Ponds as well as Rivers. All ya gotta do is watch both as Jets fly over. The Contrail is short & last less than 5 minutes as it evaporates Where as the Chemtrails last much longer & stay as a full trail even as the wind blows away.

    • @smokeythewizard8199
      @smokeythewizard8199 11 місяців тому +4

      ​@@m.j.973💯 facts!!!

    • @okedoke1234
      @okedoke1234 7 місяців тому

      You talking about the SSgt that worked at a small base bio environmental shop? Talking like she was the queen of chemtrails and how she had all these extensive tests of dirt, etc? Yeah I remember her. She was the shit.

    • @johnbrinton3873
      @johnbrinton3873 7 місяців тому

      I saw this video as well and mentioned it on this post.

  • @franksam6818
    @franksam6818 Рік тому +14

    It's not based on secrets, as much as depending on the global ignorance of a population, not interested in the Truth.

    • @texasray5237
      @texasray5237 6 місяців тому

      That's probably the most effective form of secrecy. Just keep people asleep. No need to explain anything.

  • @HelmutBchron
    @HelmutBchron 5 років тому +144

    As he shows us the pictures of them. And we see them from our back porch. This is total BS.

    • @menow.
      @menow. 4 роки тому +5

      You "see them"? Duh? NO ONE says there aren't trails in the sky. Simply SEEING a trail is not evidence that it contains harmful chemicals.

    • @billcrowder5617
      @billcrowder5617 4 роки тому +4

      @@menow. Really? You guys are so duped, I cannot figure you out. I have no idea how some can be so very stupid and ignorant...like yourself...it is a very strange thing, indeed.

    • @menow.
      @menow. 4 роки тому +4

      @@billcrowder5617 "Really?"
      Yes, really. I repeat: Simply SEEING a trail is not evidence that it contains harmful chemicals. If you disagree with that statement, please explain WHY.

    • @menow.
      @menow. 4 роки тому +1

      @@billcrowder5617 Well? You called me "stupid" and "ignorant". Why don't you SPECIFY what I said which you feel was so wrong? I REPEAT AGAIN: Simply SEEING a trail is not evidence that it contains harmful chemicals. Please explain... what is supposedly WRONG about my statement?

    • @menow.
      @menow. 4 роки тому +4

      @JayDon Saoirse na hÉireann "What's your proof that there is no harmful chemicals in the trails,"
      The same proof as you can provide that I don't have invisible unicorns living in my garage. It's the fallacy of demanding that someone prove a negative. This would require the testing of EVERY SINGLE TRAIL in the sky. The burden of proof is on those who say that aircraft trails which look and behave exactly like normal contrails are actually something entirely different. Understand?
      "you clearly agree they're more than just contrails "
      Can you quote me on that please? I have agreed to no such thing.
      " as contrails dissipate into the atmosphere within seconds,"
      Um... sorry? I certainly don't agree with that. Where did YOU get that "fact"? Who TOLD you that? You chemmies ALL say that, but NONE OF YOU can provide a citation to an actual scientific source for that claim, or any valid reason why contrails cannot persist just like any other cirrus cloud.
      "why do chemtrails linger to block out the sun?"
      Um... contrails are clouds, and clouds can block the sun. Duh?
      "( we've all seen it happen )"
      You think it's some sort of grand discovery that contrails/clouds can block the sun??
      "Why do scientists Marine biologists ex pilots and ex army personal to mention a few jeopardize their reputations go on record and say they do contain Lethal chemicals..."
      Name three.
      "If they're harmless... ( which blocking out the sun is not) "
      Again with the "blocking the sun". Do you propose we end commercial aviation in order to stop aircraft trails from "blocking the sun"?
      " ...why the big secret about it?"
      WTF are you talking about now? What "big secret"? The fact that aircraft create trails in the sky is not any sort of secret. Just because YOU don't understand it, that doesn't mean others do not.

  • @mickeyg8675
    @mickeyg8675 8 років тому +92

    I watched a plane lay trails for about an hour a couple weeks ago. They spread out slowly and eventually looked like clouds. The clouds stuck around for a few hours. Do contrails last for two hours?

    • @TridentDriver
      @TridentDriver 2 роки тому

      Yes sometime they do dumbass. Do clouds last for 2 hours?

    • @LailaBaraITrini
      @LailaBaraITrini 2 роки тому +13

      No. They don't

    • @TridentDriver
      @TridentDriver 2 роки тому +8

      @@LailaBaraITrini But spray would last 2 hours? 🤣🤣

    • @LailaBaraITrini
      @LailaBaraITrini 2 роки тому

      @@TridentDriver
      No. It's a chemical trail.
      It starts with a thick line, that spreads out slowly. Consuming the sky. Turing it into a milky haze/fog.
      Whats actually raining on us is Cadmium Aluminium barium thorium - heavy metals and other stuff

    • @LailaBaraITrini
      @LailaBaraITrini 2 роки тому

      @@TridentDriver

  • @Kwippy
    @Kwippy 8 років тому +53

    This is America, we don't care about the truth.

    • @dudev
      @dudev 8 років тому +3

      If chemtrail theorists really believed what they say, then why don't they collect as many air samples as they can and pay to have them lab tested?

    • @dudev
      @dudev 8 років тому +1

      ***** -- The "proof is out there" on the internet? The problem is that the believers looking are uneducated, conspiracy theorists. All the science in the world is useless in the hands of an idiot. And that's what they are. Clouds can linger all day, Einstein. And your comment proves my point. You offered nothing but the standard "you're a sheep" response. Chem-trails make absolutely no sense. If I wanted to spray people I wouldn't want the chemical to linger all day long for everyone to see and for the wind to blow away. Stop watching science fiction.

    • @evocati7704
      @evocati7704 8 років тому

      Actually quite a few of us do that is why alt media is more popular than mainstream media

    • @dudev
      @dudev 8 років тому +1

      Evocati -- Too bad "alternative science" (pseudoscience) is more popular than real science.

    • @dudev
      @dudev 8 років тому +1

      ***** -- How did we end up with a scientifically illiterate and paranoid society?
      Lack of education makes people sheep.

  • @briantutterrow4681
    @briantutterrow4681 Рік тому +14

    I've been an airplane enthusiast all of my life. Watching aircraft of all types from prop to jet. Never in my entire life have i ever, and I mean ever, seen a contrail last more than a 1/4 mile in the sky. All quickly dissipated. These lines do not dissipate. Aluminium is not a normal element found in our atmosphere. Barium definitely is not. These elements have devastating effects on our ecology and our bodies. If you survey 100 people who all think and do as they are told, you will get only one answer. Many scientists have come out only to be quickly confronted by the controlling media and their controlled piers. A quick look at the countries being covered by this and compare to those countries that are not. The sooner we admit it, the sooner we can come together and put a stop to it.

    • @siouxperb5570
      @siouxperb5570 Рік тому +1

      Your failure to notice or understand persistent contrails doesn't change the fact that they absolutely DO exist, and have for more than 80 years.
      As an "aircraft enthusiast", you should fully understand why 'chemtrails' are impossible. Why don't you?

    • @texasray5237
      @texasray5237 6 місяців тому

      As all the money and political influence is in the hands of the evil manipulators. It's not likely that the truth will gain the upper hand any time soon.
      It still appears to be a long long long long time, before the dawn.

  • @jackjones9766
    @jackjones9766 3 роки тому +43

    I have never seen a contrail spread out into clouds. They usually dissipate very fast soon after.

    • @siouxperb5570
      @siouxperb5570 3 роки тому +3

      Then you haven't been paying attention. There are numerous in-situ studies of contrails doing that very thing.

    • @coopertown7867
      @coopertown7867 Рік тому +2

      Start looking up more often.....like every day. I promise you won't be disappointed

    • @okedoke1234
      @okedoke1234 Рік тому +1

      What aircraft are equipped to spray chemtrails? How are they equipped? Who services the chemical tanks on the aircraft? Who maintains the chemtrail equipment? I eagerly await any chemtrailer's fully detailed answer, as someone with 36 years experience in US military aircraft maintenance.

    • @gixxerboy555
      @gixxerboy555 11 місяців тому

      exactly!

  • @micraw714
    @micraw714 6 років тому +58

    I wish what you were saying was true... I really do. However there are scientists that DO indeed believe they're spraying chemicals and have taken soil and water samples showing high content of micronized aluminum ☹

    • @johnnyd5687
      @johnnyd5687 2 роки тому +3

      Exactly

    • @nextnetworkent
      @nextnetworkent Рік тому +1

      here is proof they are spraying Silver Iodide a toxic chemical on us ua-cam.com/video/L9Xibk6QQ44/v-deo.html

    • @elyjahstark
      @elyjahstark Рік тому +1

      @@nextnetworkent Using multiple accounts to advertise your own video just makes you continue to look like an idiot. And your video is still only shots of persistent contrails proving why they are impossible to be anything but water condensation. And you mixed in the typical false equivalence fallacies like cloud seeding, further proving you have no clue what you are talking about. Keep trying

    • @coopertown7867
      @coopertown7867 Рік тому +2

      Yes. And it takes very large amounts of limestone to even get our crops to grow now. If you want to go down the rabbit trail even deeper, research how many trains hauling limestone for farmers end up "derailed"🤔🤔🤔🤔

    • @nextnetworkent
      @nextnetworkent Рік тому

      @@coopertown7867 yes there are ALOT of derailments of chemical trains in highly populated areas and along big rivers these days. The deepstate is colluding with international scumbags. Wont be long before the truth comes out. Hang in there brother.

  • @allend807
    @allend807 7 років тому +42

    Young Turks feel the need to DeBunk conspiracy theory a lot

    • @williamnoble6120
      @williamnoble6120 3 роки тому +1

      truth is important.

    • @KandyKoRnKorpse
      @KandyKoRnKorpse 2 роки тому

      Exactly! If chemtrails aren't real then why does the media and government cover the subject of chemtrails so often? They try way to hard to convince us there is no such thing as chemtrails if there is really no such thing as chemtrails. A lot of people believe in actually crazy conspiracies yet the media doesn't constantly cover them and try to debunk them because they know they aren't real and that would be stupid. The only reason to cover chemtrails would be because they know they are real and they are trying to convince the public that they are not because they are nefarious and they are afraid of the truth getting out.

    • @Frankie-c5x
      @Frankie-c5x 11 днів тому

      Shysters

    • @Frankie-c5x
      @Frankie-c5x 11 днів тому

      ​@@williamnoble6120it is. And chemtrail geoengineering is too!

  • @dam4274
    @dam4274 Рік тому +19

    Contrails dissipate, chemtrails don’t dissipate, they spread and cloud the skies.

    • @siouxperb5570
      @siouxperb5570 Рік тому +1

      Name any substance, element, or compound OTHER THAN WATER that will do what you're claiming to make your 'chemtrail' hoax reality. Let's hear it

  • @lunog
    @lunog 8 років тому +163

    I´m seeing lots of this almost all year long over my city (in south Europe) in the last years. Since then, the weather became much worst, especially in spring, even harming agricultural crops. They create clouds, rain and bad weather in general (at the very least).

    • @samsimons5609
      @samsimons5609 2 роки тому

      White vinegar vapours destroy chem trails the acetic acid eats the heavy metals and wipes them out, i use it and it works especially when u heat it up, Try it for urselves guys and spread the word we can fight back

    • @joeKisonue
      @joeKisonue 2 роки тому

      Yeah it was predicted 20 years ago. I read about coming changes in Eastern European weather back then to be caused by climate change. Earlier, longer colder winters and hotter summers. It's no surprise to people who consume scientific information all the time as opposed to people who seek explanation only after they notice a change and unfortunately find answers in the wrong place. An easy place put there by people who are not intelligent.

    • @kisslandcr
      @kisslandcr Рік тому

      It’s to block the sun out from us

    • @nextnetworkent
      @nextnetworkent Рік тому

      here is proof they are spraying us ua-cam.com/video/L9Xibk6QQ44/v-deo.html

    • @yesyes-om1po
      @yesyes-om1po Рік тому

      that could be a genuine cause, China tried to manipulate the weather by firing 40mm shells designed to heat up and create humidity in clouds creating rain, this worked but ended up causing apocalyptic levels of weather later.
      Jet engines burn very hot, 1000+ degrees hot. It wouldn't be too crazy to think that it could eventually influence the weather over time.

  • @jenkemp
    @jenkemp 5 років тому +99

    You’re paid by the govt

    • @esthermontoya8032
      @esthermontoya8032 4 роки тому +3

      For some reason on this phone i only get videos on you tube denying chem trails. You tube is getting attention!!

    • @charleenneal
      @charleenneal 4 роки тому +5

      @@esthermontoya8032 Same. UA-cam scrubbed opposing views.

    • @esthermontoya8032
      @esthermontoya8032 4 роки тому

      @@charleenneal maybe. Unless you are the one (no i dont mean you, you) writing/twicking the logarythm. But once again . on this phone ...there is No videos (recomended) confirming chemtrails or alike.

    • @mikeedwards3364
      @mikeedwards3364 4 роки тому +1

      good job,,most of these conspiracy people have a paranoid personality,,and are anti govt people

    • @mariecoleman5801
      @mariecoleman5801 4 роки тому +1

      @@esthermontoya8032 Basically the same thing I get. Listen to him joke about it and the Viagra comment... Priceless.

  • @krisl1885
    @krisl1885 7 років тому +122

    stop lying

  • @elizabethcote9070
    @elizabethcote9070 Рік тому +9

    So this podcast was 6 YEARS AGO. DO YOU SEE AN INCREASE in chem trails NOW! I DO . THIS DATE IS JULY 19,2023

  • @nommoking4206
    @nommoking4206 7 років тому +132

    Bs the proof isn't even hidden. I used to respect your channel until you got bought.

    • @davidhood9712
      @davidhood9712 5 років тому +3

      Thomas Mellon
      I love that this comment is copy-pasted across the comment section, as if you want to drown out anyone else’s opinions.

    • @davidbrucemusicvideo
      @davidbrucemusicvideo 5 років тому +5

      David Hood, that’s the best you can do in regard to the guy’s comment about the experiment he did in his yard? Tell him it’s a cut and paste? Of course it’s a cut and paste, so he can share the experiment with multiple people. I found it pretty interesting.

    • @elyjahstark
      @elyjahstark 5 років тому +1

      David Bruce what exactly about his experiment do you find even remotely interesting?

    • @oscarb9139
      @oscarb9139 5 років тому +1

      Thomas Mellon Interesting experiment. Stupid, but interesting.

    • @oscarb9139
      @oscarb9139 5 років тому +1

      David Bruce Stupid experiment. Period.

  • @jamescobrien
    @jamescobrien 5 років тому +40

    Watch the trails on clear calm days, then you'll see for yourselves. I watch them while enjoying the sun, I see them begin spraying, then stopping the spray. Contrails continue on, the high altitude's cold temperature ensures this. Then on calm clear days, I watch the thicker chemtrails (usually in criss cross patterns) spread out and form into huge long clouds. I notice unnatural looking symmetrical wave patterns in these clouds. I also notice the contrails not forming into clouds as they disperse into the air.

    • @siouxperb5570
      @siouxperb5570 5 років тому +1

      Do you know what the difference between a contrail and a 'chemtrail' is? Nothing. One is the actual word for what you are seeing, the other is a made up conspiracy word coupled with the willful misunderstanding of persistent contrails. It's the perpetuation of ignorance that allows baseless and physically impossible hoaxes like 'chemtrails' to exist.

    • @jamescobrien
      @jamescobrien 5 років тому +2

      @@siouxperb5570 Please explain these videos to me then. I got to copy and paste them in the following:

    • @siouxperb5570
      @siouxperb5570 5 років тому +1

      @@jamescobrien Gladly, but you failed to paste anything. Try again?

    • @sdhomeguide6343
      @sdhomeguide6343 2 роки тому +1

      @@siouxperb5570can you explain how under the exact same conditions, under the exact same sky, some planes leave ‘contrails’ while others don’t? I can see a commercial passenger plane not leaving a hint of contrails, while other unmarked planes criss cross the sky leaving persistent, expanding chem trails in their wake.

    • @siouxperb5570
      @siouxperb5570 2 роки тому +1

      @@sdhomeguide6343 Certainly. Different conditions. Differential humidity or different temperatures due to variations in altitude. Humidity in particular can change very drastically over very short distances, both laterally and vertically.

  • @garla5851
    @garla5851 7 років тому +229

    Never seen stuff like this 20 years ago !!

    • @SocialZingCraze
      @SocialZingCraze 5 років тому +7

      Gar La exactly!!!!

    • @loveorange4658
      @loveorange4658 4 роки тому +11

      I see it right now outside

    • @OldHollywoodNews
      @OldHollywoodNews 4 роки тому +6

      Actually it was around 20 years ago... I remember seeing it... it seems to come and go in waves.

    • @loveorange4658
      @loveorange4658 4 роки тому +4

      @@OldHollywoodNews flat earthers be like...
      Proof!!!😱

    • @menow.
      @menow. 4 роки тому +5

      Then you weren't paying attention. Persistent contrails have been seen, studied and understood since WW2 and before.

  • @johnnypootoogook6869
    @johnnypootoogook6869 Рік тому +8

    This kinda thing happens here in this town where i live.
    Snowflakes aren't like the coin size like the way used to, more like small hail.
    Weather most of the time is foggy.

  • @goodson77784
    @goodson77784 7 років тому +83

    Liars

  • @SSj3Ninja
    @SSj3Ninja 8 років тому +51

    prince believed in chem trails and now hes dead, u do the math.

    • @Kaddywompous
      @Kaddywompous 8 років тому +5

      I did the math: it's 78.3.

    • @Yutani_Crayven
      @Yutani_Crayven 8 років тому +8

      1+1=7

    • @PapaSmurf651
      @PapaSmurf651 8 років тому +8

      Prince drank water and now he's dead? it's not a solid point to base and argument on

    • @MrYodeezy
      @MrYodeezy 8 років тому +2

      +j paul It really is because there is a "third world community" called Detroit and if they drink the water they become sick.

    • @rorocigio
      @rorocigio 8 років тому

      lol

  • @KMAsKorner
    @KMAsKorner 8 років тому +22

    I believe in chemtrails... call me a conspiracy theorist but I have a question for you... contrails are made up of water vapor... water vapor trails last 3 to 5 seconds long... why do chemtrails last hours... Answer that and I will change my mind on chemtrails.

    • @DerekkMurray
      @DerekkMurray 8 років тому +2

      I saw contrails that persisted for hours when i was young that was 55 years ago jets were rare (and mostly military) but when one went over the trail seemed to last hours. theres just more jets.

    • @KMAsKorner
      @KMAsKorner 8 років тому

      Could be... I would like to know some sort of scientific evidence... like... the dew point and temperature are about the same at those elevations causing the water vapor to stay around like fog... something like that will change my mind. You explanation does help though. thanks

    • @gofwkratos410
      @gofwkratos410 8 років тому +1

      +KMAs Korner (KMAsKorner) I've seen those chemtrails, they get fatter as they come down and they only spray it when it starts getting cloudy here in California. My dog starts getting a severe runny nose and the air smells stagnant. Not only that but it breaks up the clouds and they heat up the atmosphere.

    • @Maartimer
      @Maartimer 8 років тому +5

      I wonder what clouds are made of, and how long they last for...

    • @kirkjohnson9353
      @kirkjohnson9353 8 років тому +4

      I hate to be the one to destroy your mystery but clouds are made of water vapor and and they certainly last for hours. Why do I know the facts will not affect your belief in chemtrails?

  • @Liamjoo7
    @Liamjoo7 11 місяців тому +6

    There is a difference but there should not be I have seen with my own eyes , they are spraying something contrails dissipate chemtrails linger longer and dissipate visibly .

  • @padrescott2047
    @padrescott2047 2 роки тому +29

    This man snorts chemtrails

  • @peterkalantzis3943
    @peterkalantzis3943 7 років тому +28

    Wow, 77 scientists, or 76, say it's not sinister! Idk what they are, but don't remember them years ago. Those crazy patterns! And to quickly denounce them, when they're quite visible, as nothing to see here, when their appearance is what causes concern, is crazy

    • @yesyes-om1po
      @yesyes-om1po Рік тому

      they've been around as long as planes that can fly 15-20k+ feet have existed. they are a long standing aviation phenomenon that was quickly discovered during WW2 I believe?, as the contrails gave away a bomber's group position extremely easily. They aren't consistent and whether they form or not depends on the weather.

    • @texasray5237
      @texasray5237 Рік тому +1

      Anybody old enough to remember the skies back before the late 80s knows that what you say is not true. When I was young there were no commercial jetliners they were all propeller driven. While certain airliners could fly high enough to generate contrails almost none ever did so. The only contrails visible were military jets and those contrails never lasted more than a minute. You could see the (apparently) tiny jet (in my case usually a B52) and a contrail that trailed it for what looked like a few inches, never all the way across the sky.

  • @NoName-rg3np
    @NoName-rg3np 8 років тому +179

    I'm in my early 30's and never in my life do I remember seeing such huge contrails that hang in the air forever as a kid, particularly around dates of political importance such as near elections, except for during the last 8 years. As a child contrails disappeared as quickly as they were created. In fact, that's my visual evidence that what I'm looking at is a contrail vs a chem trail... Because a normal contrail disappears. And until there's more transparency than the young Turks telling us it's nothing but contrails, I'll believe my eyes and the evidence that's right before me. Not having proof that something exists does not rule out that it does exist. Thousands of workers are flown in every year to Area 51, and regardless of if there's aliens in there or just some top secret test space craft, those thousands of people who visit annually haven't come out and told the public shit. The point is that it's easier than you're acknowledging on your show to keep secrets.

    • @HarpersInfiniteSystems
      @HarpersInfiniteSystems 8 років тому +8

      I'm in my 30s, and I clearly remember contrails lasting a long time on some occasions, and dissipating quickly on other occasions. It depends on the wind speed at the altitude of the plane. It's not rocket science. But it is plane science!

    • @taniamaya1421
      @taniamaya1421 8 років тому +14

      These people are too young to know the difference ..... that explains it !

    • @pootis-bird
      @pootis-bird 7 років тому +6

      Jon Kleis you're only evidence is that the trails don't disappear.

    • @rupertvonstoiben1202
      @rupertvonstoiben1202 7 років тому +1

      Exposing the Dirty Yup.

    • @TheNeedmoneybad
      @TheNeedmoneybad 7 років тому +6

      The fact that chemtrails are being sprayed can be proven with your own eyes. Contrails dissipate within seconds or under a minute. They do not linger and spread out in the sky all day long. Just step away from your phone/monitor/television screen, step outside in the morning, watch them being sprayed. Then witness them linger in the sky all day long as they spread out.

  • @lojrich3934
    @lojrich3934 Рік тому +3

    Rosalind Peterson has evidence. I am a photographer and I’ve been filming them since 2012. Commercial jets don’t spray chemicals. Congress held hearings in 2009. Look it up. Geoengineering parts 1,2&3.

    • @siouxperb5570
      @siouxperb5570 Рік тому

      "Rosalind Peterson has evidence"
      Then why did she say this:
      "In 10 years of research, other than aluminum coated fiberglass, chaff releases by the US military, I have no proof whatsoever that the jets are releasing anything but jet fuel emissions" - Rosalind Peterson
      Seems you are wrong.
      "I am a photographer and I’ve been filming them since 2012"
      What is the fascination with filming or photographing contrails? Do you think that it somehow validates the 'chemtrail' hoax?
      "Commercial jets don’t spray chemicals"
      Indeed they do not. Yet, many people claim they do, per the 'chemtrail' hoax.
      "Congress held hearings in 2009"
      Sure didn't. Or, link?
      "Look it up"
      No, you made the claim, YOU prove it.
      "Geoengineering parts 1,2&3."
      False equivalence fallacy. You're trying to change the subject. Geoengineering (clearly you're referencing SAI, as geoengineering is a very broad subject) has nothing whatsoever to do with the 'chemtrail' hoax.

  • @missjem79
    @missjem79 8 років тому +50

    Why do these contrails expand into clouds?
    I've taped this phenomenon, and shouldn't the condensation disappear?
    It happens in my neighborhood all the time.
    Checkerboard trails, and expanding contrails that become clouds.
    I'm almost 40 and contrails used to disappear, not expand.
    Atmospheric changes?
    I don't know but I believe my own eyes.
    Just looking for an explanation

    • @tikirowboat
      @tikirowboat 8 років тому +5

      I'd also like an explanation as to how these trails appear to have abrupt breaks in them. If it is heat from the engines that causes condensation to form then wouldn't the trail taper off gradually and not have sudden breaks in them? If an engine was shut off mid flight wouldn't that mean that the plane might be malfunctioning perhaps? I love science. I am eager to have science and logic thrown at me so I am no longer ignorant. I can easily admit being erroneous when enough evidence and data satisfy my inquiry.

    • @XxSkilersxX
      @XxSkilersxX 8 років тому +2

      Air is not homogeneous. If you have ever flew in any plane you know that you can encounter zones where there is "holes" or hotter and colder zones.
      People see the atmosphere as if it was water, it's not, you have a lot of things happening at every layer of the atmosphere and considering it as being stable and homogeneous is ignorance.

    • @mjelves
      @mjelves 8 років тому +1

      It depend on the humidity in the atmosphere, dipshit

    • @stupidburp
      @stupidburp 8 років тому

      Contrails are just long and thin man made clouds.

    • @Brad25255
      @Brad25255 8 років тому

      You need to wrap the tinfoil better.

  • @phileo5312
    @phileo5312 4 роки тому +45

    Right like theyre really going to openly reveal the truth about chemtrails

    • @siouxperb5570
      @siouxperb5570 4 роки тому

      The truth is that they are mathematically impossible, so in reality, there is nothing to "reveal".

    • @frannypalmer2726
      @frannypalmer2726 Рік тому

      ​@@siouxperb5570 new info 3 years later. There are people admitting it's true. You can find the truth.

    • @siouxperb5570
      @siouxperb5570 Рік тому

      @@frannypalmer2726 link? Source? Cite the law of physics that has been repealed which allows for the existence of magic, please. I'll wait for any information you have.

    • @frannypalmer2726
      @frannypalmer2726 Рік тому

      @@siouxperb5570 I looked it up today but I am going to work now. Look up Chemtrails and Bill Gates. There are also other"smart" people talking about it. I don't have to prove it to you. The truth is there if you want to know it. Do your own research.

    • @siouxperb5570
      @siouxperb5570 Рік тому

      @@frannypalmer2726 "Do your own research."
      Ah, yes, the last ditch, desperate rally cry of the low IQ sheep that have both never done so themselves, nor would they know the first step as to what actual research is. Perhaps a more fitting term would be "investigate", although that would clearly be out of your realm as well.
      No, Franny, Bill Gates is funding research into SAI. I know that this is commonly used as a false equivalence fallacy by the lazy sheep that refuse to understand exactly what the 'chemtrail' hoax is. The 'chemtrail' hoax is, in short summary, exactly what you can see in the thumbnail of the video, as well as in the graphic behind the speaker throughout the duration of the video. Those are called contrails. The laws of physics prove that they cannot possibly be a 'chemtrail'. If you had done any research for yourself, or simply investigated the real research that others have done, instead of what you mislabel as "research", then you would understand why 'chemtrails' are mathematically impossible.
      This subject appears to be way over your head, both literally and figuratively.

  • @remoney
    @remoney 8 років тому +143

    Completely true. My brother and I were leaving a movie theater and he looked up and there was this huge tic-tac-toe shapped chemtrail coming down (probably 4 city blocks square) and spreading as it fell about 300 feet above us. We jumped in the car and sped out of there. Scared the shit out of us. Normal planes don't do that. Neither do birds.

    • @Babewatcherbob
      @Babewatcherbob 2 роки тому +3

      Yeah, it's called flight paths and holding patterns. Jesus Christ.

    • @siouxperb5570
      @siouxperb5570 2 роки тому +4

      "Normal planes don't do that."
      Really? Since when? Funny story though.

    • @KandyKoRnKorpse
      @KandyKoRnKorpse 2 роки тому

      Wake up! Birds aren't real. They are government drones.

    • @pattyrooney1323
      @pattyrooney1323 2 роки тому +12

      early a.m. after being sprayed like bugs in AZ . Something is falling from these clouds +it is not rain.

    • @Paleotech1
      @Paleotech1 Рік тому +2

      BS

  • @jshell5097
    @jshell5097 Рік тому +6

    Call it what you want, we all witness and notice the obvious change in climate when the spray covers our sky.

  • @EduardoGarcia-eh2rn
    @EduardoGarcia-eh2rn 8 років тому +64

    First of all, your attitude towards the people that believe this is so condescending, that any hope you had in convincing them went out the door with your continued mocking through out your report. Second, if your saying the chemtrail theories are incorrect........then you forgot to answer the most obvious question........then what are they???

    • @serranopeppers1
      @serranopeppers1 8 років тому +12

      The condescending attitude was one, ONE of the most disgusting things about this video. Wonder how much he got paid to spew this nonsense?

    • @timmchavoc
      @timmchavoc 6 років тому +1

      These people think they are above everyone to the point of disgust, listening to this scripted cut down of people who so have facts, and aren't puppets their elite overlord. Opinion is fine but needs a disclaimer if you present it in a manner of a news outlet. Thanks for telling your conspiracy theory to the world, because that's all this is

    • @michaeljohn8905
      @michaeljohn8905 5 років тому +2

      Eduardo Garcia lol anyone that believes that there is some major conspiracy are idiots. Period .
      ..

    • @siouxperb5570
      @siouxperb5570 5 років тому +2

      ".then you forgot to answer the most obvious question........then what are they???"
      Seriously? Contrails. He literally said it at around 2:20. Not that he needed to, this is everyday common knowledge.

    • @followhim1203
      @followhim1203 5 років тому +1

      @Michael John wonderful argument I now reject all conspiracies thanks to you my friend .

  • @sallybugs1695
    @sallybugs1695 6 років тому +36

    0:35 bruh, don't tell me that shit is normal. It ain't

  • @sarahb9071
    @sarahb9071 7 років тому +14

    My hope is our blue skies won't go away no matter how much they spray. It's very unethical to spray us with seemingly harmful chemicals with harmful side effects and not answer for it. I feel personally violated and want to find a petition to say no consent from me.

  • @elynlipkin3907
    @elynlipkin3907 Рік тому +13

    In our newspaper a few years ago, our local airport was caught spraying aluminium and barium. They are spraying, question is what else!?

    • @siouxperb5570
      @siouxperb5570 Рік тому

      Article?

    • @okedoke1234
      @okedoke1234 7 місяців тому

      @@siouxperb5570 Must have been the front page of the Bullshit Times.

  • @dariofontana6040
    @dariofontana6040 8 років тому +100

    I honestly believe that NO ONE gives a shit about chemtrails. Everyone is busy with either playing Pokemon Go, or watching Keeping up with the Kartrashians.

    • @ForAnAngel
      @ForAnAngel 8 років тому +8

      People like Alex Jones do

    • @cjpayne2385
      @cjpayne2385 8 років тому +1

      Power

    • @eugeneggrossmann9434
      @eugeneggrossmann9434 8 років тому +6

      +For An Angel Do you think repeating Alex Jones name makes chemtrails not real?
      Alex has nothing to do with weather modification. Actually I think weather modification is one of the tamer reasons for chemtrails. Do some research. There are photos of 757s on the web that show their insides gutted and spraying tanks filling the planes.
      Know what this. The skies did not look like this 40 years ago. They did not look like this when I was a child. The clouds were easily identifiable and did not spread out to cover the entire stratospere with grey vapor within hours of a fly by. Grids were not formed.
      We have a whole generation with the wool pulled over their eyes. Just like the dummy who did this video. By the way, mister knowledgeable reporter I would love to talk to you.

    • @iMergeAndSee
      @iMergeAndSee 8 років тому

      Ha, who looks up anymore?

    • @Pipebomb666
      @Pipebomb666 8 років тому +7

      +Eugene G Grossmann Do some research for explanations as to why they are NOT chemtrails. I don't know what your evidence is but for example one picture of a 757 that was gutted with "spraying tanks" were actually ballast barrels used for testing large airliners, through which water is pumped to simulate shifts in center of gravity such as passengers moving about the cabin.

  • @davidbohannon9819
    @davidbohannon9819 7 років тому +16

    I seen the trails all the time they don't dissipate for hrs...Chem trail's are real

    • @sachadee.6104
      @sachadee.6104 7 місяців тому

      maybe you can explain to me why there would be chemicals spread ALL OVER THE WORLD. By whom? What is the purpose?

  • @zombiwurm2659
    @zombiwurm2659 8 років тому +37

    Then why the obvious grid patterns?

    • @kirkjohnson9353
      @kirkjohnson9353 8 років тому +12

      Those are called "flight paths". All planes have them

    • @kirkjohnson9353
      @kirkjohnson9353 8 років тому +6

      So you can smell the contrails that are 30 thousand feet above you?
      Car exhaust contains sulphur- I'm surprised you can't smell that instead.

    • @tikirowboat
      @tikirowboat 8 років тому

      There are areas where the grid pattern starts curving and heading in the opposite direction.

    • @marcuswillson4523
      @marcuswillson4523 8 років тому +3

      lol, its not one plane, they are simple flight patters, you can google them, its not that hard. they why wouldnt they stick around? clouds stick around for hours.... so your telling me you can smell 30 thousand feet away from you?

    • @Qxagaming
      @Qxagaming 8 років тому +1

      ... please tell me you aren't serious

  • @frankmurillo9823
    @frankmurillo9823 Рік тому +10

    Heard a story of my friend when she was younger She told me her boyfriend then friend was in the military. He said would drop pellets into the sky Im a trash truck driver I’m outside all the time. I see the airplanes. Early morning spraying. The mountains later turn into a mean haze from a distance. The trails spread all morning. Could be contrails. I bet all my money some of them are not.

    • @siouxperb5570
      @siouxperb5570 Рік тому +1

      Sounds like your friend is alluding to cloud seeding. That is totally different from the contrails you see spanning the skies. And if you were to bet all your money that those are not all contrails, you would lose your money. The mass of those trails you see are more than the max gross takeoff weight of any aircraft on the planet, which obviously means they were not sprayed from the payload of any aircraft.

    • @frankmurillo9823
      @frankmurillo9823 Рік тому +1

      Morning in so cal has no clouds. Calm no wind. Perfectly spayed, lines slowly disperse evenly What ever you believe is cool. I’ll take my bets

    • @siouxperb5570
      @siouxperb5570 Рік тому +1

      @@frankmurillo9823 You're claiming that there is an aircraft that can carry a payload of many tens of millions of pounds? Seriously?
      What do surface winds have to do with the high velocity winds at cruise altitudes?
      What does a lack of clouds have to do with contrail forming conditions?
      What do straight, perfectly formed contrails do to confuse you?

    • @frankmurillo9823
      @frankmurillo9823 Рік тому

      Good luck

    • @siouxperb5570
      @siouxperb5570 Рік тому

      @@frankmurillo9823 It's not luck. It's knowledge. Are you unwilling to address your misperceptions?

  • @Euzifyy
    @Euzifyy 7 років тому +27

    Stealth bombers were spotted spraying chemtrails over some parts of the USA. Unmarked, unidentifiable aircraft are also flying all over the USA, Canada and other countries spraying these trails.

    • @blackdesertcat
      @blackdesertcat 2 роки тому +2

      They're also using drones

    • @texasray5237
      @texasray5237 2 роки тому

      Stealth bombers are anything but stealthy below 50 thousand feet.

    • @BurninatorTheTrogdor
      @BurninatorTheTrogdor 11 місяців тому

      Yes. A month ago I watched a black diamond shape drone make one. I live very close to San Clemente island.

  • @magzire
    @magzire 8 років тому +27

    he obviously never witness it for himself

    • @mofiddly
      @mofiddly 8 років тому +6

      Hard to believe that. All you have to do is look up. He's just a shill. Sad.

    • @Nik.No.K
      @Nik.No.K 8 років тому +5

      Right because if you think something happened to you that makes it a fact. I fucking pray you do not have children.

    • @ivermec-tin666
      @ivermec-tin666 8 років тому +3

      It is possible that he has not personally observed the phenomenon in a rural context. Chemtrails are quite visible in some parts of the country; not so in others.
      The disconnect between chemtrails and commercial jet flight only becomes obvious and inexplicable in areas where there are NO commercial jet flights... and yet there is a grid pattern of chemtrails in the upper atmosphere (higher than commercial jets fly anyway).
      IF chemtrails are part of a weather modification, rain making, or geoengineering program or programs; then they would be much more visible in the Western states than in the Eastern states; because rainfall is more sparse in the West than in the Eastern half of the USA. Also, the Japanese current flows from the Pacific Ocean East to the Great Plains. It is clear that there is an incentive to discourage precipitation in the Arid West and to encourage precipitation in the Midwestern states which are the bread basket of the country, a major export commodity, and the heart of Corporate Agriculture.
      Rain making is an unregulated activity. If I want to I can fly a plane and make rain as much as I want. I won't have to fill out any forms or seek permission to do so. The upper atmosphere is unregulated in this regard. Therefore, there would be no paper trail to prove or disprove such activity; yet there are powerful financial incentives to engage in it on a regional level, a State level, much less a National level.
      There is also plenty of incentive for an organization such as NATO to engage in a program of geoengineering, ostensibly to respond to global warming by inducing a cooling effect. If such a program simultaneously acidifies the soil and ground water killing forests and making conventional agriculture increasingly unproductive; well that would be a bonus for Agribusiness. As John D. Rockefeller said, "Competition is a sin".
      All of which is beside the point. There is a photo of chemtrails in the backdrop of this video. He seems to have no curiosity as to why contrails would persist for hours. This phenomenon is absolutely inexplicable as condensate trails, jet exhaust, unspent jet fuel, or jet fuel exhaust. If there were such a scientific explanation, such an explanation would have been proffered. Therefore, one must conclude that these are NOT condensate trails, but something else. That is how science works.

    • @Nik.No.K
      @Nik.No.K 8 років тому +2

      ***** "That is how science works."
      He says disregarding all scientific evidence.

    • @KrisHardy0
      @KrisHardy0 8 років тому +4

      "He seems to have no curiosity as to why contrails would persist for hours." Then, by that logic, clouds shouldn't exist either, so they must be a government conspiracy.

  • @KevinMartinez-zd9xj
    @KevinMartinez-zd9xj 8 років тому +115

    JFK Shot First #TeamAlexJones

  • @clist9406
    @clist9406 Рік тому +13

    Contrails dissipate in a few minutes, chemtrails stay for hours and grow

  • @johnburns1839
    @johnburns1839 2 роки тому +63

    Prior to the Covid era I saw chem trails at least once or twice a week. They ran for miles and miles and even across the horizon. Would such a result come from jet engine steam exhaust? Every jet aircraft would leave hundreds of miles trails- except that THEY DON'T. Chem trails have solids in them which gradually disperse into the atmosphere. Right through 2020 and 2021 I saw chem trails on about 6 occasions. They've recently started back up and we need to be concerned.

    • @siouxperb5570
      @siouxperb5570 2 роки тому

      "Prior to the Covid era I saw chem trails at least once or twice a week"
      You nor anyone else has ever seen a 'chemtrail'. Math proves that they do not exist. You see persistent aircraft contrails.
      "They ran for miles and miles and even across the horizon. "
      You may not realize it, but your statement supports the fact that 'chemtrails' are mathematically impossible.
      "Would such a result come from jet engine steam exhaust?"
      WTF is "steam exhaust"??? But if you meant to say contrail, the answer is an absolute yes.
      "Every jet aircraft would leave hundreds of miles trails- except that THEY DON'T."
      Of course they ALL don't, and for a very obvious reason. Can you guess what it is?
      "Chem trails have solids in them"
      Name these solids, and how you determined exactly what they are, and the methodology you used in determining this.

    • @texasray5237
      @texasray5237 Рік тому +10

      6 occasions??? Really???
      I've been seeing them almost every day since about 2000. And at least 50 planes a day

    • @Rossboe1
      @Rossboe1 Рік тому

      Yeah now you mentioned it, I remember during covid they stopped doing it as much. That makes you think maybe they are poisoning us? I drove across Australia and can't remeber seeing them out in the outback, seems like they only spray over and around cities.

    • @tractor629
      @tractor629 Рік тому

      Where I’m at in Washington it’s all day every day!!

    • @runfargetlost991
      @runfargetlost991 Рік тому

      everyday in phoenix AZ@@tractor629

  • @SwissConnectedENT
    @SwissConnectedENT 8 років тому +23

    So you just believe what ever you're told TYT? Smh

    • @marklarizzle
      @marklarizzle 8 років тому +2

      i only believe whatever I want, so flat earth and chemtrails are what I select.

    • @chopchopchop5585
      @chopchopchop5585 8 років тому +2

      Aren't chemtrail nuts just believing what they have been told? You thought you had a point but then you didn't.

    • @BrendanBeckett
      @BrendanBeckett 8 років тому +1

      You're the one believing what you're told, by conspiracy theorists. There's no actual *evidence* for chemtrails, and that is what Jon is talking about, not what he's been "told".

  • @jameylapping5948
    @jameylapping5948 2 роки тому +52

    Love how they say found 0 evidence of secret spraying program, Well then it wouldn't be too much of a secret then would it?

    • @elyjahstark
      @elyjahstark 2 роки тому

      And yet somehow people believe the blatantly visible trails behind planes is a secret spraying program….

    • @j.c.follower6538
      @j.c.follower6538 9 місяців тому +4

      10 to 15 years ago there were a lot of UA-cam channels talking about Chemtrails, there were all kinds of patents. There were passenger jets with all seats removed and replaced with barrels filled with chemicals. Long hoses were coming out of the barrels and lined to the back of the jet and set up so when the airline pilot flicks a switch aluminum, barium, strontium and other chemicals come out the back end of the jet. Fires have been blamed on chemtrails. The chemicals have a drying effect on vegetation. The chemicals are very bad for all life.

    • @keithjohnson5190
      @keithjohnson5190 9 місяців тому +1

      UA-cam won't let the truth be shown on here anyway. I remember a video of a jet that was setup for spraying and now I can't find it.

    • @MPA-ww2oy
      @MPA-ww2oy 8 місяців тому

      Yea 10-15 years ago there was so much evidence here at youtube. Politicians and so on even joined the club. The chemtrails are real, and in my city we have barely seen the sun since June 2023.

    • @spillanegottleib1681
      @spillanegottleib1681 7 місяців тому

      This idiot reading off the teleprompter has not gone out into the field for even 30 seconds of real-world research in his entire life.
      Then claims there is no evidence.
      Vetting, stupid. Vetting.

  • @globalwarninguk
    @globalwarninguk Рік тому +4

    Most people over a certain age remember what the skies looked like. Clouds had a particular look and were given type names. Jet planes would leave a vapour trail (or as it's called today com trail) but after a little while those trails would disappear. Today and for many years in fact the skies are littered with criss-crosses of white trails that linger in the skies for hours, coursing the sun light to create a white blanket effect. This is not normal. Anyone who says it is a liar. Normal people who have observed what they see are in-fact scientists ( the word science means with knowledge) Chemtrailing is a fact.

  • @SuperTrainStationH
    @SuperTrainStationH 8 років тому +12

    This video is pointless. To these people, any evidence to the contrary to their pre-determined conclusion only serves as proof of a cover-up.

    • @meoneandonly_
      @meoneandonly_ 8 років тому

      Youre right, but I think the real gem here is supposed to be the comment section of this video ;)

  • @Crrow777
    @Crrow777 8 років тому +138

    This must be what is called blind comedy. No evidence - funny as hell - thank you for the laugh. BY the way stop in for thousands of hours of evidence.

    • @weareearthguardians1417
      @weareearthguardians1417 6 років тому +28

      Chemtrails are geo-engineered aerosols that are loaded with toxic chemicals, including but not limited to: barium, strontium 90, aluminum, cadmium, zinc, viruses and “chaff.” Chaff looks like snow but it’s actually Mylar fibers (like in fiberglass) coated with aluminum, desiccated blood cells, plastic, and paper. Polymer chemist Dr. R. Michael Castle has studied atmospheric polymers for years, and he has identified microscopic polymers comprised of genetically-engineered fungal forms mutated with viruses, which are now part of the air we breathe.

    • @fallencorporal
      @fallencorporal 5 років тому

      Crrow777 candida auris

    • @ksportz66
      @ksportz66 4 роки тому +1

      @@weareearthguardians1417 How are they sprayed from the plane?

    • @tristanmaigret1977
      @tristanmaigret1977 4 роки тому +6

      splish
      splash
      your
      opinion
      is
      trash

    • @tim3854
      @tim3854 4 роки тому +1

      @Nyana11 old movies are being edited apparently

  • @Howto354
    @Howto354 8 років тому +36

    I have witnessed numerous occasions where they would spray and it would rain within a couple hours or by the next day, I've seen Chen webs falling out of the sky (look it up), I've photographed multiple plains that are all commercial airlines flying at the same altitudes than others, also after watching the planes for a while.. you can definitely see the difference between a contrail and a chemtrail.. it's very obvious and what they are spraying is serious, I know it may seem bizarre but sooner or later they will admit to it.. Just research for yourselves. I can understand why people think this is a crazy conspiracy because it really is and we don't know what is sprayed. I just wish everyone would research themselves and look at the obvious signs because one day we can all come together and overthrow then so our grandkids won't have to go threw what we did.

    • @Howto354
      @Howto354 8 років тому +1

      sorry bout the typos I'm faded

    • @jeanballard8514
      @jeanballard8514 8 років тому +3

      thank you milky for speaking the truth .

    • @frannypalmer2726
      @frannypalmer2726 Рік тому +1

      I am posting this 6 years after your post. They ARE admitting it now. The famous jerk Bill Gates admitted it on video. Among others. The sky here looks like crap and has all week. The sun comes up and the sky is a beautiful blue. Then the trails appear. About an hour later there is no more blue sky. Just Haze. It makes me angry.

    • @imonthewinningside8281
      @imonthewinningside8281 Рік тому +2

      That was 6 years ago. I'd say NO ONE who can still look up in the sky has any excuse anymore!

  • @carlislecampbell3571
    @carlislecampbell3571 Рік тому +10

    So y the hell 7 to 8 jets flying over my island Jamaica at the same time and the trail only start when it reaches over the island

    • @siouxperb5570
      @siouxperb5570 Рік тому

      Because that is a major corridor for flights from the southeastern US to destinations in South America, and the area over the island is where the boundary of the pocket of higher humidity was. Do you also question why clouds appear in certain areas of the skies on partly cloudy days?

    • @King_Kudjo
      @King_Kudjo Місяць тому

      ​@@siouxperb5570 did you MISS the part where the trails START....?

    • @King_Kudjo
      @King_Kudjo Місяць тому

      Great point

    • @siouxperb5570
      @siouxperb5570 Місяць тому

      @@King_Kudjo Elaborate.

    • @King_Kudjo
      @King_Kudjo Місяць тому

      @@siouxperb5570 "the trail only start when it reaches over the island".

  • @anthonyadair1604
    @anthonyadair1604 8 років тому +23

    but wouldn't that make perfect sense?? pay the scientists to come out against the conspiracies????🤔🤔🤔

    • @Maartimer
      @Maartimer 8 років тому +2

      If you can imagine for a second that conspiracies like that are wrong, who do you propose should be trusted to break that to people?

    • @Maartimer
      @Maartimer 8 років тому +1

      Aldous Huxley Like?

    • @my1stytchannel
      @my1stytchannel 8 років тому +2

      it wouldn't just be the scientist. Everyone that works on the planes themselves would have to be in on it but have to know it and hide it someone eventually would come out with the truth but no one has no one will because it's simply not true

    • @Yutani_Crayven
      @Yutani_Crayven 8 років тому +1

      Aldous Huxley The problem with you people is that you are stretching *well known information* way too much, far beyond what it actually says and what it supports.
      You keep going out of your way to misconstrue and spin it, so either you lack even the most rudimentary reading comprehension and analytical skills to understand what is being presented there, or you're flat out trolling.

    • @Yutani_Crayven
      @Yutani_Crayven 8 років тому +1

      Aldous Huxley Soil tests prove no such thing.

  • @TheIronmike123
    @TheIronmike123 8 років тому +47

    Your payed shills. Do your home work before posting, kids.

    • @zeevlewis6628
      @zeevlewis6628 8 років тому +10

      I love how people like you never provide evidence. You just claim that anyone with a different opinion than you is a "paid shill" and that's that. Put your tin foil hat back on before the scary science, facts and logic get you.

    • @Nibiru2012ishere
      @Nibiru2012ishere 8 років тому +5

      +Ze'ev Lewis www.geoengineeringwatch.org/links-to-geoengineering-patents/ here is a patent list need more evidence?

    • @stupidburp
      @stupidburp 8 років тому

      This was a copy of other recent reports that were equally shallow and incomplete.

    • @Brad25255
      @Brad25255 8 років тому +1

      Shouldn't you be making a tinfoil bunker to protect yourself?

    • @Greenmailerr
      @Greenmailerr 8 років тому

      You're*

  • @waynzwhirled6181
    @waynzwhirled6181 8 років тому +52

    I'm a TYT fan, but you lost a lot of credibility with me here. Your naivete is breathtaking.

    • @newdrew2744
      @newdrew2744 8 років тому +5

      same...

    • @newdrew2744
      @newdrew2744 8 років тому +5

      Let's say that Chem-trails are really con trails that last for hours.
      He and others say contrails are just water vapor, contrails are water vapor and jet fuel.
      So either way these many spreading persistent lines in the sky is heavey air pollution.
      Now, what's in jet fuel and what effects do those things have on human biology and environment?
      Now that question will require critical thinking and research.

    • @jqpublic3104
      @jqpublic3104 8 років тому

      Agreed

    • @nicolas4601
      @nicolas4601 8 років тому

      +Information Awareness Office And so?
      This hypothetical method isn't new. It doesn't mean that it has already been implemented in absolute secrecy.
      Injecting sulphur dioxide in the stratosphere wouldn't be inconsequential.
      We would witness a significant decrease of the daylight intensity in large areas, most likely forming a circle around the Earth due to its rotation (like we do with volcanic eruptions).
      Therefore, we would also witness a significant decrease of harvests in these same areas, due to the diminished photosynthesis.
      We would also probably see an increase in pulmonary diseases, especially within the children population. That would be difficult to tie to the SAI though, since climate change and pollution can also be held responsible for that.
      Finally, we would see the sulfur mining industry overperforming the other mining industries on the stock market.
      Until you show me evidence of such phenomenons occuring, I won't waste any of my time even considering this (yet another) conspiracy theory. A speech from a oil industry shill making excuses to delay real and, for some, costly solutions to the Global Warming issue, won't cut it.
      _"An SAI program could limit global temperature increases, reducing some risks associated with higher temperatures and _*_providing the world economy additional time to transition from fossil fuels_*_."_ - John Brennan, same speech. That was his whole point. As if the solution to the junk we're putting in the atmosphere were to put even more junk....
      But if you're really committed to it, and if you're willing to look for and gather the evidence, here is my piece of advice: look into the south hemisphere. That's where I would test SAI (less land, less rich and powerful people who could complain and come after me) if I were a NWO plotting cynical bastard.

    • @CaseyFinSF
      @CaseyFinSF 8 років тому

      Nicolas Jeuniau I think the IAO is short circuiting and mumbling talking points to no one who will listen.
      In other words, IAO is just another useless machine with limited functionality

  • @okedoke1234
    @okedoke1234 9 місяців тому +6

    How are the chemical delivery systems maintained? How come in the history of aircraft maintenance, across hundreds of thousands of airliners or military aircraft, maintained by millions of aircraft maintenance personnel, performing hundreds of millions of aircraft maintenance tasks, at hundreds or thousands of bases around the world, we have the grand total of ZERO pictures, stories, maintenance data, etc, of ANY sort of "chemical delivery systems" on aircraft. I am very interested in your actual answer to this question. An answer, not another question. Before you attempt to make some shit up to answer this, just to let you know, I have 36 years experience in US DoD aircraft maintenance across many bases and types of aircraft. All JAQing off to this question will be ignored.

    • @BlackAdder-wp6dn
      @BlackAdder-wp6dn 8 місяців тому +1

      Let's simplify...just look up. There's your answers. That is NOT normal.

    • @okedoke1234
      @okedoke1234 8 місяців тому

      @@BlackAdder-wp6dnAhhh yes the famous "Just look up". Wow. Thanks. Such scientific proof. BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAAAAAAAA

    • @okedoke1234
      @okedoke1234 7 місяців тому

      And here we are again, the only “answer” we have to this is the scientifically and logically rock-solid “just look up”. Yeah baby. Chemtrailers at their best here!

    • @AtSafeDistance
      @AtSafeDistance 6 місяців тому +1

      There were pictures someone snuck out but they aren't on the youtube any more. Yeah I made that up because I so want this to be true. SMH. People that watch the sky and that have watched the sky, know these planes are not normal transport planes. What kind of transport plane turns off the chemtrails, turns around, and then starts them again going back the other way?

    • @okedoke1234
      @okedoke1234 6 місяців тому

      @@AtSafeDistance I don't know. I work in aircraft maintenance for 36 years. Maybe you can tell me. Maybe, just maybe, what you are saying is complete and total bullshit. You ever considered that?

  • @stevenfraney5114
    @stevenfraney5114 8 років тому +84

    The only times I remember these kind of persistent vapor trails appearing behind planes were crop dusters and sky writers. High altitude jets often left contrails when I was a kid but they never stretched from horizon to horizon and lasted all day. Just look at the sky in the background of old movies and tv from the seventies and eighties.

    • @ivermec-tin666
      @ivermec-tin666 8 років тому +5

      Steven Franey - How can I label you a conspiracy nut if you keep referencing archival footage? You oldsters are wily. Luckily, the younguns are too lazy to look at such things. Pokeymon go anyone?

    • @elyjahstark
      @elyjahstark 2 роки тому +1

      There are numerous movies from the 50s through the 90s that have persistent contrails in them. Diamonds are forever. Back to the future. Spartacus. The list goes on

    • @valiken1
      @valiken1 Рік тому

      @@elyjahstark there are literally articles on MSNBC admitting the White house is "considering" using this technology. Also John Brennan Director of the CIA talking about it

    • @elyjahstark
      @elyjahstark Рік тому +1

      @@valiken1 are you referring to the research into SAI? I take it you’ve never bothered to research anything about SAI? Because then you wouldn’t have made yourself look dumb by bringing it up as an attempt to talk about the visible trails in the sky behind airliners

    • @valiken1
      @valiken1 Рік тому

      @@elyjahstark to answer your question: yes I am referring to the research into Strategic Aerosol Injection.. Funded by Bill Gates, popularized by ex-CIA director Brennan, mainstream documentaries done about, and articles on MSNBC written on it. admitting they are going to be using jets to spray chemicals into the atmosphere to fight climate change. Billions of funding already done, very controversial. Would it be a stretch to say maybe they already started doing it, and that's why these new trails being left behind last for hours and turn into clouds if you watch them on timelapse, instead of dissipating like Contrails do.
      And please do not confuse Strategic Aerosol Injection with Condensation trails, which are caused by heat of the jets exhaust heating up the air and creating water vapor which then turns into ice crystals, which dissipate very quickly.

  • @Jordan23-G.O.A.T.
    @Jordan23-G.O.A.T. 4 роки тому +12

    Can I ask this guy a question? I understand what the contrail is, as it usually disappears a few seconds after it's released into the Sky by a plane. Can you tell me what the other Trail is which stays in the sky and after 30 minutes or so turns into a huge cloud that spreads. Can you explain what that is?

    • @siouxperb5570
      @siouxperb5570 4 роки тому

      That is called a PERSISTENT contrail. They've been observed, documented, and understood for more than 80 years.

    • @loulourogers4757
      @loulourogers4757 2 роки тому

      Its called geo engineering , not chemtrails. It is documented in Paris Climate Accords. It is a lie to be used to say they are reversing " climate change " which smart people know is a hoax.

    • @okedoke1234
      @okedoke1234 Рік тому

      Who told you they "usually disappear in a few seconds"?

    • @VladimirUnique1
      @VladimirUnique1 5 місяців тому

      @@okedoke1234head of meteorology center tells, contrails up to 30 min maximum

  • @LilyfireTV
    @LilyfireTV 8 років тому +7

    IF not intentional... maybe something in the fuel or whatnot is DIFFERENT than it was when I was a kid.... Contrails dissipate, don't you remember back before 1990 we had blue skies, and contrails disappeared.

    • @sonicpsycho13
      @sonicpsycho13 8 років тому

      Let me just hop into my time machine...
      Contrails dissipate due to atmospheric winds. If the winds up there are slow or non-existent, then they take longer to dissipate. Atmospheric conditions even need specific properties just to form contrails or clouds.

    • @ThePcarroll001
      @ThePcarroll001 8 років тому

      Pro Tip -- when you see an intentional propaganda story like this --- and that is what this is --- it will always come with a healthy dose of paid trolls in the comments section to go with it. They will be using a standard mix of talking points, snark, and hostility -- as is their standard MO. No one has yet solved this problem, to my knowledge -- but that is who is going to be here on these comments, like the one below. Just so you know.

    • @Herculesross
      @Herculesross 8 років тому

      Sounds true. Not true.

  • @jpoppiejaun35
    @jpoppiejaun35 Рік тому +4

    Normal contrails dissipate within a few minutes

  • @666xxxful
    @666xxxful 8 років тому +69

    I have witnessed a clear day turn into a cloudy day because of these trails, and they were in perfect cross hatched patterns every time, and would expand into what became cloud cover. NJ,NYC.

    • @voxelpixel5761
      @voxelpixel5761 3 роки тому +8

      This is exactly what I see in my city.
      Read my post pls. Thank you.

    • @jmacflash63
      @jmacflash63 3 роки тому

      You are so right , the news will say it's going to be a sunny day , I don't pay attention to that anymore , I will look up at the sky and see about six chemtrail plains spraying away and there goes the sunny day , in the winter you block the sun the gas company makes more money from people heating there homes and your solar panels become useless .

    • @brunojardim1860
      @brunojardim1860 2 роки тому +3

      Same in the UK, every day that starts with blue skies, turns cloudy and gloomy after an hour or so off crosshatching chemtrails or whatever they wanna call it.

    • @esterbaque7757
      @esterbaque7757 2 роки тому

      THey are poison us.

    • @samsimons5609
      @samsimons5609 2 роки тому

      White vinegar vapours destroy chem trails the acetic acid eats the heavy metals and wipes them out, i use it and it works especially when u heat it up, Try it for urselves guys and spread the word we can fight back

  • @jasonamrhein9593
    @jasonamrhein9593 8 років тому +254

    This video had way too many dislikes.

    • @alexdavinci9533
      @alexdavinci9533 8 років тому +18

      That's because TYT aren't conspiracy mongers like A Jones.

    • @OnTheRocks71
      @OnTheRocks71 8 років тому +27

      A lot of people are really stupid.

    • @Azirahaelx
      @Azirahaelx 8 років тому +5

      +math2844 got evidence for the existence of chemtrails?

    • @GlobalTV123
      @GlobalTV123 8 років тому +2

      Because there are lot of really stupid people in the word.

    • @ddc4531
      @ddc4531 8 років тому +3

      +math2844 Exactly!

  • @SeanBryantHayes
    @SeanBryantHayes 8 років тому +42

    That's exactly what the evil scientists would want you to think. THINK ABOUT IT.

  • @oneofall626
    @oneofall626 Рік тому +4

    A contrail does not behave the same as a chemtrail. The ingredients use in a chemtrail can also be measured. Contrails exist and chemtrails exist. They are easily distinguishable.

    • @siouxperb5570
      @siouxperb5570 Рік тому

      Contrails behave exactly like contrails do. 'Chemtrails' do not exist, physics proves this. Contrails have been measured and studied in-situ. Can you cite a 'chemtrail' study of similar nature?
      Please, detail the easily distinguishable differences.

    • @oneofall626
      @oneofall626 Рік тому

      @@siouxperb5570 chemtrails exist. Do your own research. If you still disagree, so be it.

    • @siouxperb5570
      @siouxperb5570 Рік тому +1

      @@oneofall626 It's not a matter of agreement, nor opinion. Anyone that has researched the issue understands that the 'chemtrail' hoax is mathematically impossible. Why don't you? Are you scientifically illiterate?

    • @Tylerd838
      @Tylerd838 Рік тому

      @@siouxperb5570what’s impossible about it

    • @siouxperb5570
      @siouxperb5570 Рік тому +1

      @@Tylerd838 Mass

  • @nicholaskazantzidis
    @nicholaskazantzidis 8 років тому +77

    I have seen great documentaries about this and there was spraying from private companies as well not just the government. I have stood in the center US and watched this trails very deliberately get done.

    • @texasray5237
      @texasray5237 2 роки тому +5

      I saw documentaries like that too. But the companies were small, used smaller planes and small remote airports and only had a few planes. I think it was just an effort to explain away the chemtrails. Just where I Iive I sometimes see hundreds of chemtrail planes per day. And they are big jets. And they are totally outside the normal air corridors. That's probably why they fly lower than all the passenger planes, to avoid accidents, because they are all over the place.

    • @texasray5237
      @texasray5237 2 роки тому +5

      I agree. Here where I live I think the chemtrail program is handled by some sort of commercial company but under contract with the government and under strict rules of secrecy as well.

    • @pattyrooney1323
      @pattyrooney1323 2 роки тому +1

      HRC own ev er gr een av ia tion

    • @sharko4093
      @sharko4093 Рік тому +1

      @@texasray5237 You know absolutely nothing about aviation, no big jets are spraying chemtrails

    • @nextnetworkent
      @nextnetworkent Рік тому +5

      @@sharko4093 yes they are. you can watch them doing it but you are just a shill so theres really no point in arguing with you.

  • @teksupporter4087
    @teksupporter4087 8 років тому +37

    John, could you please confirm why some contrails linger in the sky hours longer than others? Thank you.

    • @PerryEllis.365
      @PerryEllis.365 2 роки тому +2

      After five years did he ever answer you?

    • @conradgieblewicz7233
      @conradgieblewicz7233 2 роки тому +6

      No he can't.

    • @PerryEllis.365
      @PerryEllis.365 2 роки тому

      @@conradgieblewicz7233 🤣🤣🤣

    • @samsimons5609
      @samsimons5609 2 роки тому +1

      He cannot nor will ever answer u cos its a lie they are chemtrails

    • @ClarkPotter
      @ClarkPotter 2 роки тому

      I hope they're paid well to be this dumb and to gaslight and promulgate genuine disinformation. I'm ashamed I ever thought TYT was anything else.
      Researching stuff to talk about is their full-time job before actually saying it and they "fail" when the info is out there to anyone with an internet connection. Just a few hours of honest looking and anyone with any integrity wouldn't be saying what John does here.
      They must be funded by some billionaire or entity to say this bs that anyone with a phone or keyboard knows isn't true.
      Words cannot express what I wish upon them.

  • @jgordon165
    @jgordon165 3 роки тому +6

    actually they are real, and it's public knowledge. You don't need "proof" it is being publicly acclaimed, it's just not professed outwordly.

    • @siouxperb5570
      @siouxperb5570 3 роки тому +1

      Countless 'chemtrail' trolls have made this claim that it is real, and public knowledge. NONE have ever been able to back up this claim. Care to try to be the first? Invariably, all of the others have tried changing the subject via false equivalence fallacy, usually to either SAI research or cloud seeding. What's your false equivalence going to be?

  • @bobcharles2683
    @bobcharles2683 11 місяців тому +4

    I live in an area of the UK where aircraft fly in aerial roadways, in other words they always fly either west or east, and con trails follow that pattern, however we are now seeing these trails taking a rigid grid pattern, and the trails are exact and uniform as if made on purpose, no one is coming forward to answer questions or explain why we are seeing this or who is making them !! I'm no conspiracy theorist but it is worrying that something is being done that may or may not be sinister.

    • @curiouscat8457
      @curiouscat8457 11 місяців тому +1

      "no one is coming forward to answer questions or explain why we are seeing this or who is making them !!"
      Try to look up "Contrails simulator - contrails science". These patterns always existed. You just didn't pay attention until some imbecile on the Internet told you to look for them deadly chemtrails.

  • @Flipdodge392
    @Flipdodge392 8 років тому +13

    Just the picture behind him disproves this video.

  • @martinpatrick4720
    @martinpatrick4720 2 роки тому +11

    Why didn’t we see this in the 1990s

    • @siouxperb5570
      @siouxperb5570 2 роки тому

      Only if you weren't looking. Persistent contrails are documented fact pre-dating WWII.

    • @kevinsheldrick917
      @kevinsheldrick917 Рік тому +1

      It's like autism in the 1930s: the claim is that it was always there but it's just that everyone in the world simultaneously just plain didn't notice for years on end

  • @geo-george1375
    @geo-george1375 7 років тому +6

    Ken Caldeira is intimately involved with this program, which is WHY he would deny its existence.

  • @Gballpikker
    @Gballpikker Рік тому +8

    What ever happen to the video taken from a private jet following a large jet turning chemtrail nozzles on and off from a several years ago. I can no longer find it on youtube.

    • @siouxperb5570
      @siouxperb5570 Рік тому

      Are you talking about the 'chemtrail' spoof video, of one KC-10 in trail with the other, and the flight crew of the trailing KC-10 is mocking the 'chemtrail' morons?
      ua-cam.com/video/t22wy4c-A-A/v-deo.html
      That one?

    • @sachadee.6104
      @sachadee.6104 7 місяців тому

      youtube often deletes untrue video's.

    • @Gballpikker
      @Gballpikker 7 місяців тому

      But more often than not they remove the truth. Over the top censorship channel.

    • @johnbrinton3873
      @johnbrinton3873 7 місяців тому +2

      I saw a video where Pres Trump was talking to a military woman about chemicals being sprayed. They showed barrels and invoices for the barrels of chemicals they were using, and also did a walkthru in an aircraft configured for spraying complete with numerous tanks secured to the floor and attatched piping going to spray nozzles on the wings.

    • @Gballpikker
      @Gballpikker 7 місяців тому +2

      @@johnbrinton3873 I've seen a similar photo of such a plane.

  • @newageworld
    @newageworld 5 років тому +26

    laughable..Greetings from chemtrailed thaikand

  • @RebeccaJacksonMaitriyah
    @RebeccaJacksonMaitriyah 2 роки тому +9

    Man you must be feeling really embarrassed about making such statements now that it's undeniable.

    • @siouxperb5570
      @siouxperb5570 2 роки тому

      You're joking, right? The 'chemtrail' hoax is more laughable now than it ever was. Physics. Stop being a gullible sheep, there is no such thing as magic. Math proves them to be impossible.

    • @elyjahstark
      @elyjahstark 2 роки тому +2

      And yet all of their statements are still verifiably true and the trails in the sky are still impossible to be anything but water condensation proven by the laws of physics, among many other proofs.

    • @RebeccaJacksonMaitriyah
      @RebeccaJacksonMaitriyah 2 роки тому +2

      @@elyjahstark since when did condensation cause weather events. Climate change is a global effort.

    • @elyjahstark
      @elyjahstark 2 роки тому +2

      @@RebeccaJacksonMaitriyah since the dawn of time? Condensation is rain, it’s fog, it’s hail, it’s snow, it’s clouds, it’s humidity. What a weird question to ask. Did you really not know that

    • @siouxperb5570
      @siouxperb5570 2 роки тому +1

      @@RebeccaJacksonMaitriyah How about the math, Rebecca? Get that figured out yet?

  • @GAB1777
    @GAB1777 2 роки тому +5

    The question would be why rainwater is no longer suitable for consumption today.

    • @siouxperb5570
      @siouxperb5570 2 роки тому

      If true, it would likely have a lot to do with pollution, and nothing to do with the 'chemtrail' hoax.

    • @AngelVasquez-h3b
      @AngelVasquez-h3b 6 місяців тому

      You aught to see what it does to a garden

  • @Blueskies445
    @Blueskies445 6 місяців тому +3

    If they are spraying chemicals all over the sky in every state, wouldn't that also affect the people who spray and the people who order the spraying?

    • @montysmythe579
      @montysmythe579 4 місяці тому

      Yes, which means there must be a counter substance that you can take, which deals with pcbs and the like, say for instance, nascent iodine @12%

  • @HUNK115
    @HUNK115 7 років тому +59

    unsubscribed

  • @gregoryturner8469
    @gregoryturner8469 3 роки тому +11

    Can you believe that a four year old video could cause this much controversy. That's a good thing it keeps the truth alive they can't bury it.

    • @siouxperb5570
      @siouxperb5570 3 роки тому

      There is no "controversy", sunshine. There is irrefutable fact, and there is gullibles that believe in hoaxes. If you have any way to refute the facts of atmospheric science and physics that PROVE that these are contrails, then feel free. Best of luck.

    • @gregoryturner8469
      @gregoryturner8469 3 роки тому +3

      @@siouxperb5570 there is nobody on Earth that convince me that there is not such a thing as chemtrails. I have seen the plane spraying with my own eyes.

    • @siouxperb5570
      @siouxperb5570 3 роки тому

      @@gregoryturner8469 So the fact that these trails contain tens of millions of pounds more mass than any aircraft can carry doesn't convince you? That's a single trail, from a single aircraft. How do they do that?
      Seeing an aircraft making a contrail constitutes seeing an aircraft "spray" according to you? That's freaking hilarious.

    • @lucycat4305
      @lucycat4305 Рік тому +1

      @@siouxperb5570 You still wear a mask, don't you?

    • @lucycat4305
      @lucycat4305 Рік тому +1

      @@siouxperb5570 How many covid boosters have you had???

  • @kobiecabral634
    @kobiecabral634 7 років тому +34

    I noticed they stopped chemtrailing 8 months ago in LA and all of a sudden it starts raining like it used to rain

    • @evildax2173
      @evildax2173 7 років тому +1

      Kobie Cabral Man made drought's?

    • @davidhood9712
      @davidhood9712 5 років тому +2

      Moisture in the air (rain) affects water vapour.
      I think you’re mixing up cause/effect.

    • @doreeneclose6295
      @doreeneclose6295 5 років тому +2

      It's now been 3 weeks without chem trails in the Boston area. It's glorious to see the real sky again!

    • @oscarb9139
      @oscarb9139 5 років тому +2

      Actually, they don’t chemtrail. They never chemtrailed because it doesn’t exist. You are a fool.

    • @flightnation4877
      @flightnation4877 5 років тому +1

      NO THEY DOING IT RIGHT NOW AS TYPE IN LA

  • @jwhite5396
    @jwhite5396 Рік тому +5

    Ever hear of non disclosure order? I watched a plane do a U turn to keep spraying. No more blue skies with white clouds. Now it’s streaky hazy.

    • @siouxperb5570
      @siouxperb5570 Рік тому

      You saw an aircraft on one end of a holding pattern? And it terrified you? Why?
      There is no non-disclosure order for anyone whose job would require the existence of magic.

    • @jwhite5396
      @jwhite5396 Рік тому

      @@siouxperb5570 Aww. You poor thing.

    • @siouxperb5570
      @siouxperb5570 Рік тому

      @@jwhite5396 Aww, Did sunshine get embarrassed for not understanding basic hold patterns? 🤣
      Carry on, sunshine!

  • @babygorilla4233
    @babygorilla4233 8 років тому +55

    is it a slow news day?

    • @babygorilla4233
      @babygorilla4233 8 років тому

      George Mason normally i would agree trolls are shit but your argument is also shit aply evreything you just said about the tyt videos to the commentes section you dont half to read my comment like i dont have to watch the video you dont have to read the comment i dont have to make a hateufll comment well gess what neither do you find annother comment

    • @babygorilla4233
      @babygorilla4233 8 років тому

      George Mason if your gona hate dont be a hypocrite

    • @babygorilla4233
      @babygorilla4233 8 років тому

      ***** still he dosent half to type a paragraph to tell me to shut up by doing basicly the same thing i am that just seems like a waist of energy

    • @qhsperson
      @qhsperson 8 років тому +1

      I say, start spay/neuter programs for the conspiracy theorists. (At least then they'd have something real to moan about.)

    • @theunholinesswithin70
      @theunholinesswithin70 8 років тому

      I don't know how this world could ever be slow in the news dept. What, the world took a day off from committing death and destruction?

  • @Pythos_Sapunov
    @Pythos_Sapunov 8 років тому +13

    Had one guy in the military who worked on fighter aircraft that believed that the jets he worked on put out chemtrails that were supposed to mind control or kill off population. i asked him "So.. you work on these aircraft every day and you inhale every chemical that seeps from this thing... dont you think you would have cancer or loving big brother if there was actually that mind/population control chemicals in the aircraft?"
    His answer was silence

    • @Pythos_Sapunov
      @Pythos_Sapunov 8 років тому +1

      now make sure you all take a deep breath under the contrails and pay your taxes, Big Brother is watching Kappa

    • @johnkennedy3970
      @johnkennedy3970 8 років тому

      his answer was silence because he knew he was talking to a brick wall

    • @Pythos_Sapunov
      @Pythos_Sapunov 8 років тому +1

      john kennedy because he had no argument of why the aircraft he has worked on for 8 years hasn't killed him, nor has made him love big brother.
      The jets did a max climb to altitude, and about 12,000 feet they began contrailing, to which he tried to correct me and tell me they were chemtrails. Chemtrails come from missile exhaust because of the combustion of the rocket fuel, contrails are moisture that has condensed around exhaust particulates and form exactly what they look like.. Clouds.
      I'm sorry that a civilian scrub such as yourself doesn't know any better, but i'm sure that your ignorance is bliss in this regard.
      So come at me with his argument brah, Why isnt he dead, nor am i. I've breathed JP-8 for hours and hours doing Hot Pit Refueling, inhaling exhaust. So tell me. Why am i Not dead if the whole purpose is some Illuminati plan to kill or control human beings?
      If you have an argument, come on, be a man.

    • @johnkennedy3970
      @johnkennedy3970 8 років тому +1

      I`ve smoked cigarettes and drank whisky for over 40 yrs....so what are you telling me? these are healthy products ? even RAID doesn't kill a fly right away

    • @Pythos_Sapunov
      @Pythos_Sapunov 8 років тому +1

      john kennedy First, Raid traps are microdoses of chemicals that are time released so they are slowly digested by insects so that they will bring it back to the colony and kill the entire group since they share food supply. a fly will be affected in the same way, only it is a more solitary insect and doesn't share meals with young. So theres that comparison out of the way.
      Second, Any time release chemical that we inhale would have to be A. Accepted by the lungs and B. solid enough that it would have to last years upon years of bodily fluids in order to have its delayed effect. even then, there would be respiratory side effects within weeks if that were the case. you're better off injecting a plastic capsule on the inside of someone's pelvis than anything aerosol, because someone like myself would feel those effects near IMMEDIATELY in the high concentrations there are around aircraft, Especially engine exhaust.

  • @nfact5879
    @nfact5879 6 років тому +13

    Chemtrails confirmed!

  • @MarkWestonX
    @MarkWestonX Рік тому +4

    Cloud Seeding example
    During the early 1960s, scientists from the Desert Research Institute (DRI) helped to pioneer the science of wintertime cloud seeding, developing research-based methods for increasing winter snowpack and subsequent snowmelt runoff across mountainous regions of the Western US. Since the DRI Cloud Seeding Research Program’s early days, our team of experts has conducted continuous research and development to create time-tested cloud seeding methods that are proven to enhance snowfall from winter storms. DRI’s cloud seeding projects are conducted in an environmentally safe manner, increasing the precipitation formation efficiencies of passing clouds to support the water needs of local communities and ecosystems.
    DRI’s team of scientists and technicians work year-round to design, maintain, and operate successful cloud seeding projects for state, local, and federal partner agencies. During the 2022-2023 winter season (November - May), DRI will conduct cloud seeding research and operations in six mountain ranges including the Lake Tahoe Basin (CA/NV), Spring Mountains (NV), Ruby Mountains (NV), Santa Rosa Mountains (NV), the San Juan Mountains (CO), and in the Upper Colorado River Headwaters region along the Continental Divide in northern Colorado. DRI cloud seeding generators will also be operated over the Grand Mesa in western Colorado.
    In addition to designing and conducting cloud seeding projects for specific partner agencies, DRI’s team monitors the results of cloud seeding operations via a network of precipitation stations. The team is also actively involved in subfreezing cloud physics research, including studies of clouds that cause icing on aircraft, and the effects of air pollution on clouds structures and storms. The cloud seeding research program is operated by DRI’s Division of Atmospheric Sciences, and based out of DRI’s Northern Nevada Science Center in Reno, Nev.
    www.dri.edu/cloud-seeding-program/

    • @siouxperb5570
      @siouxperb5570 Рік тому +1

      That's nice, but what in the FUCK does cloud seeding have to do with the idiotic 'chemtrail' hoax? The two have absolutely nothing to do with each other, so why the off topic deflection?