Nice talk, but i suspected some discussion about transitioning insects from water to land, instead he was talking half of the lecture about CT scanning.
Early aquatic insects (probably living in Devonian swamps and streams) may have evolved from crustaceans that are closely related to today's branchiopods. A couple examples would be the triops (that little trilobite-looking thing they would send to you in the mail) or fairy/brine shrimp (sea monkeys, which you can also get in the mail, both groups have eggs that enter a cystic state until they come into contact with water, to allow them to survive the dry season in ephemeral ponds) and scientists think they are more closely related to insects (actually hexapods in general) than malacostracan crustaceans like crabs and lobsters.
I'm pretty clear on the evolution of Chalicerates such as Arachnids, but from where do insects derive? Were their ancestors a sister group to Crustaceans? Might the wings be the extra two pair of legs like in some Crustaceans?
The first arthropods to come to land were sea scorpions and isopods... As for the origin of wings, the experts are now deciding exactly. I suggest you keep looking for insect origin videos, the internet is a veritable trove of wonderful information.
The oldest fossil related to crustaceans is Isoxys from Cambrian stage 3.... the oldest fossil related to chelicerates is aglaspis from Cambrian stage 3.... They look already different from each other at that time period... so what you are looking for is not yet discovered and probably took place on stage 2 if not 1...
@@Native2Earth wrong. Birds and mammals ancestors diverged in the Carboniferous period around 340 million years ago. Insects and arachnids ancestors diverged before the Cambrian, over 500 million years ago.
@@insectilluminatigetshrekt5574 Sharks and mammals last common ancestor was the cartilaginous fish of the Ordovician 450 million years ago……. 300 million years of evolution before the first mammal arose in the Jurassic. It was not 300 million years of evolution between birds and mammals (only about 50m) just like it was not 300 million years of evolution between insects and arachnids. My position is more accurate than yours that’s all I’m saying…. I guess that makes you “wrong” 🤓
@@kinglyzard nope, it's not for people interested in this topic or random UA-cam watchers, the target audience is people who might be willing to invest in this kind of technology. It's a sales pitch framed as a lecture. That's what a lot of Ted talks are tbh. It's still quite interesting though
There is no ev-i-dence that bugs have ever been anything but bugs. The fossils show ants are always ants, not part ants, ditto bees, spiders, any you can name. This is the usual in evolutionism, theories which reject the actual data. You can get new species of a bug. However, speciation (the creation of a new species) does not support evolutonism as it is an example of stasis and stasis is the exact opposite of evolution. For ex. over 200,000 species of beetles are all still beetles. There are thousands upon thousands of species of birds, bees, lizards, trees, bacteria, trees, yeast, flowers, whatever. If a new species develops with any life form at all, you can bet your bottom science dollar that it will still be just a beetle, bee, bacteria, tree, fish, or whatever. . We are supposed to fill in the blanks here with...faith...and think, "Well! If new species develops then things just keep evolving and evolving." But the next step above a Species, in the Annimal or Plant Kingdom, is a Family. We aren't seeing any new Families (much less any new Order, Class, Phylum, Kingdom) forming. Anywhere. Ever. Accorrding to Darwin's so called Tree of Life and peer reviewed evolutionary literature, new Families, Orders, Classes and Phylums have evolved. Over and over and over. . However, nature operates today as it did in the past. In the real world, with trillions of life forms, we never see anything developing above the level of a new species. The life forms out there have purportedly had aeons and aeons of ancestors preceding them which should be showing at least one example of a part this Family "transitioning" to be another Family. . But we only see that in the unverifiable, purely theoretical, realm of evolutionary literature, never in any life around us. If there is no evidence for transtiions from one Family (not to mention from one class, order or phylum or kingdon) to another - and please provide data if you know of any such evidence - then there is no evidence for evolution. And that's just for starters. You are not a fish update. You have a Creator, your Heavenly Father, Who loves you. Find out who you really are.
Great talk, but for me it is so strange when scientists simply ignore the single-celled organisms, when they say "insects are the most diverse group of all life". This is not true. Insects are the most diverse of multicellular life. But single celled organisms, specially bacteria outnumber any other group immensely.
Wonderful talk. Thank you
Thank you for interesting video. Best wishes and great respect to the entomologists!
Nice talk, but i suspected some discussion about transitioning insects from water to land, instead he was talking half of the lecture about CT scanning.
Same. Great job nonetheless.
Early aquatic insects (probably living in Devonian swamps and streams) may have evolved from crustaceans that are closely related to today's branchiopods. A couple examples would be the triops (that little trilobite-looking thing they would send to you in the mail) or fairy/brine shrimp (sea monkeys, which you can also get in the mail, both groups have eggs that enter a cystic state until they come into contact with water, to allow them to survive the dry season in ephemeral ponds) and scientists think they are more closely related to insects (actually hexapods in general) than malacostracan crustaceans like crabs and lobsters.
I'm pretty clear on the evolution of Chalicerates such as Arachnids, but from where do insects derive?
Were their ancestors a sister group to Crustaceans?
Might the wings be the extra two pair of legs like in some Crustaceans?
The first arthropods to come to land were sea scorpions and isopods...
As for the origin of wings, the experts are now deciding exactly. I suggest you keep looking for insect origin videos, the internet is a veritable trove of wonderful information.
@@seagecko
Thanx.
Most insects have 2 pr wings and 3 pr legs.
Decapods have 5 pr of legs.
Could those wings be former legs??
@@kinglyzard it’s just randomness no design
Very interesting
That was awesome!
Very interesting indeed
Hello
Beckett
I have been wondering when did Arachnids split from the Insects?
The oldest fossil related to crustaceans is Isoxys from Cambrian stage 3.... the oldest fossil related to chelicerates is aglaspis from Cambrian stage 3.... They look already different from each other at that time period... so what you are looking for is not yet discovered and probably took place on stage 2 if not 1...
Other way round. Insects evolved on land. Arthropods and arche-arachnids (sea scorpions e.g) came first...
Insects and arachnids as similar as sharks and mammals
Can you share a link with the Arthropod phylogenetic tree?
Insects seem to stick out.
Which Arthropods are their closest relatives??
More accurately birds and mammals
@@Native2Earth wrong. Birds and mammals ancestors diverged in the Carboniferous period around 340 million years ago. Insects and arachnids ancestors diverged before the Cambrian, over 500 million years ago.
@@kinglyzard crustaceans are the last common ancestor with insects
@@insectilluminatigetshrekt5574 Sharks and mammals last common ancestor was the cartilaginous fish of the Ordovician 450 million years ago……. 300 million years of evolution before the first mammal arose in the Jurassic. It was not 300 million years of evolution between birds and mammals (only about 50m) just like it was not 300 million years of evolution between insects and arachnids. My position is more accurate than yours that’s all I’m saying…. I guess that makes you “wrong” 🤓
Class, who is the target audience for this talk?
Me
Me
Me
@@kinglyzard nope, it's not for people interested in this topic or random UA-cam watchers, the target audience is people who might be willing to invest in this kind of technology. It's a sales pitch framed as a lecture. That's what a lot of Ted talks are tbh. It's still quite interesting though
Sometimes I ask myself 250 million years ago? We can’t even play the game telephone w 6 people without messing it up
So 400 million years ago insects were land creatures.
There is no ev-i-dence that bugs have ever been anything but bugs. The fossils show ants are always ants, not part ants, ditto bees, spiders, any you can name. This is the usual in evolutionism, theories which reject the actual data. You can get new species of a bug. However, speciation (the creation of a new species) does not support evolutonism as it is an example of stasis and stasis is the exact opposite of evolution. For ex. over 200,000 species of beetles are all still beetles. There are thousands upon thousands of species of birds, bees, lizards, trees, bacteria, trees, yeast, flowers, whatever. If a new species develops with any life form at all, you can bet your bottom science dollar that it will still be just a beetle, bee, bacteria, tree, fish, or whatever.
.
We are supposed to fill in the blanks here with...faith...and think, "Well! If new species develops then things just keep evolving and evolving." But the next step above a Species, in the Annimal or Plant Kingdom, is a Family. We aren't seeing any new Families (much less any new Order, Class, Phylum, Kingdom) forming. Anywhere. Ever. Accorrding to Darwin's so called Tree of Life and peer reviewed evolutionary literature, new Families, Orders, Classes and Phylums have evolved. Over and over and over.
.
However, nature operates today as it did in the past. In the real world, with trillions of life forms, we never see anything developing above the level of a new species. The life forms out there have purportedly had aeons and aeons of ancestors preceding them which should be showing at least one example of a part this Family "transitioning" to be another Family.
.
But we only see that in the unverifiable, purely theoretical, realm of evolutionary literature, never in any life around us. If there is no evidence for transtiions from one Family (not to mention from one class, order or phylum or kingdon) to another - and please provide data if you know of any such evidence - then there is no evidence for evolution. And that's just for starters.
You are not a fish update. You have a Creator, your Heavenly Father, Who loves you. Find out who you really are.
An absurd, rambling, self-contradictory rant built around demonstrably false statements. Lorica completely wastes everyone's time.
There is no evidence that creationists have ever been anything other than, wrong!
Do they copypaste these creationist tracts or are they actually typing all that horsecrap?
@@FuchsiaShocked Who knows
Great talk, but for me it is so strange when scientists simply ignore the single-celled organisms, when they say "insects are the most diverse group of all life". This is not true. Insects are the most diverse of multicellular life. But single celled organisms, specially bacteria outnumber any other group immensely.
f̷̩̜͚̤͇͔̿̋̓̐͜͝͝e̷̞͍̲̜̔̃́͝e̷̠̭͎̽̂̾̕d̷̛͈͓͉̮̦͔̼͈̳͔͙͊͌̌̊̔̏̊͂̔̚̚t̸̢̛̤̰̯͕͊̀̈́̈͛́̈̒̓͝͝h̴͖̠̱̝̣̼̩͕̥̭̜͊̍͗̋͛̾͋̌̍̒̓̍͝ę̴̛̯̮̰͖̝͎̼͎͙̼̻̻̺̈́͒̈́͐͂̔͒͘͠â̵̬̰͍̾̉ĺ̸̞͌̐͐̉̑̐̓͒̎̊̈͘͝g̸̛̩̥͌͋̌̊̑̌̈̓͝õ̴̡̯̥͔͓̙̪͓̫͓̞̞̣̜͓̅̀̑̉̒̋̇̄̐̋͝r̸
I fell asleep watching this