The History of Warfare Between Science and Christianity is Fiction!
Вставка
- Опубліковано 28 кві 2024
- Dr. Craig explains the origin of the "warfare" language between science and Christianity, and then highlights how this language is unwarranted.
See the full lecture here: • Faith & Science: Frien...
For more information visit: www.reasonablefaith.org
We welcome your comments in the Reasonable Faith forums:
www.reasonablefaith.org/forums/
Be sure to also visit Reasonable Faith's other channel which contains many full-length videos, debates, and lectures: / reasonablefaithorg
Like the Reasonable Faith Facebook Page: / reasonablefaithorg
Follow Reasonable Faith On Twitter: / rfupdates
Follow Reasonable Faith on Instagram: / reasonablefaithorg
Follow Reasonable Faith on TikTok: www.tiktok.com/@reasonablefai...
Why this is even a thing blows my mind.
For me it has always been about the what and the WHY.
There is no problem in my eyes. You can have both science and Scripture.
your ignorant scriptures claims that stars are little lights in a solid dome that can be knocked off. So nope, you can't have science and your cult's ignorance.
Of course you believe that. You also believe that a dead small Jewish sect leader is coming back to take you to your mansion on gold paved streets up in the sky!😂😂😂
Where the Conflict Really Lies by Alvin Plantinga is a great philosophical study of the topic
Excellent book! - RF Admin
@drcraigvideos fine tuning... irreducible complexity. Yeah, really hard hitting stuff 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
@@midlander4 What makes you think this book is solely or even primarily about fine tuning? Spoiler: It's not. But the fact that you think that's what this book is about or boils down to says more about you than the book. 🙃
In my experience, the story of Galileo is the most often cited story of the historical rift between science and not just Christianity, but religion in general; but in particular between science and the Catholic Church. This rift of course becomes more superficial the deeper one researches the relationship between early scientists and and their religious affiliations.
What's interesting is that on a surface reading the Galileo conflict looks like it was a debate between science and religion (or science and Christianity). But, for the past handful of decades (probably 50-60 years) historians of science have largely rejected this view that the Galileo controversy was between science and religion. If you want to look into this in much more detail, read books such as these:
"Setting Aside All Authority" by Christopher M. Graney
"Galileo Goes to Jail and Other Myths" by Ronald L. Numbers
"Retrying Galileo, 1633-1992" by Maurice A. Finocchiaro
In my opinion, the current cosmological models are irreconcilable with atheism. They point strongly to God.
Thankyou sir for sharing 🙏
The Old Testament teaches the view that was current at the time and place of its writing: that the earth is a disk, with stars on a firmament above it, and beyond the stars is the cosmic sea. Irenaeus said there are 4 Gospels because there are 4 corners of the earth and Augustine denied the existence of Antipodes.
Science and God go hand in hand. It is what God asks of us and a way for us to glorify Him.
Jesus lives ♥️ and is God 🙏🏻 Christ ✝️ and King 👑
It happens often because some scientists misrepresent the truth and claim to represent the entire scientific community. For instance, they would claim that science suggests that the Earth is 4.54 billion years old when the truth is that only some scientists subscribe to this view and many do not.
Here's the big catch. Even if science and religion, on paper, should not conflict with each other, and even if, say up until the last century or two, scientists were okay with religion and religious people were okay with science, that does not change the fact that for the last few decades at least, there have been a disturbingly large amount of people that deny some basic tenants of biology, being the common understanding that populations of organisms change over time in predictable ways, all of which are religious by a rounding error. Therefore, there is a huge conflict between religion and science, and honestly saying otherwise would be spouting fiction. Even if religion could coexist with the concept of evolution as understood scientifically, which honestly, I believe it can, there is a large amount of religious people that would disagree, calling evolution the devils attempt to brainwash the masses, or something to that effect, including pretty much everyone at my church group, all of the teachers and staff of the school I went to, and all four of my grandparents. I mean, seriously, how could someone hold the opinion that there isn't a problem when I could name organizations like discovery institute, pretty famous, _(pretty clearly religious although they won't usually say as much)_ and entirely dedicated to making up or conflating data to conflict with the modern understanding of biology.
Your optimism and positivity are inspiring Dr. Craig
🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮
Science was never against religion. It's not that in the 20th century science progressed drastically and people realized that God doesn't exist, it's just that they began to hate God and turned to science for comfort.
No, it's because as science has progressed, more and more of the stories religions like Christianity claim are true, have been shown to be false. And no matter where we look, there is no evidence that justifies believing that any gods exist.
Your god being evil is a completely separate issue to why people don't believe it exists.
@@somerandom3247 what stories in the Bible have been demonstrated to be false?
And you're dishonest if you say there is no evidence. The evidence is there, you're just not convinced. That's a different thing.
@@nuramgad128
Genesis creation,
Adam and eve,
Noahs ark.
just to name a few. Those 3 set up the foundation for the rest. Without them, the rest of the stories crumble.
I agree about the evidence. I didn't say there was no evidence, I said there was none that justifies belief.
@@somerandom3247 i see.
The creation account in Genesis is figurative and much of Genesis is figurative actually. There is good evidence for the flood. Science does confirm that we have common ancestors, so i don't see how this contradicts the Bible.
@@nuramgad128
Id like to see this good evidence you have for the flood.
You would also have to explain where all the water came from ,where it went, how the animals got to and from the boat, how they all fit on the boat, how such a small crew kept all those animals alive for so long, how everything got around the incest problem, and why there is no evidence of the genetic bottleneck in any animals DNA.
The science that shows us we have common ancestors is what show us everything didn't all come into existence as they were. it absolutely contradicts the bible.
So many Christians unfortunately take the bait and try to argue "against science". It's a losing proposition and only guarantees that you will turn the unsaved away from Christ.
Right, I see that so much!
It's important to be clear what is actually meant by the word "science" in this context and to distinguish between actual science and the scientism of government sponsored demagogues like "doctor" AnthonyFauxi and his accomplices at the ¢.d.¢. and the W.|-|.0.
It's important to be clear what is actually meant by the word "science" in this context and to distinguish between actual science and the $¢ientism of government sponsored demagogues like "do¢tor" Anthony FauX¡
Let's not mistake arguing against science with arguing against $¢¡ent¡$m
Dr Zakir naik's debate with William Campbell is very good to learn how many scientific mistakes there are in the Bible. This debate is very interesting debate. The topic was quran and the Bible in the light of science. I think Zakir naik won the debate. People should watch it, especially Christians to open their eyes about Bible mistakes and science facts.
The scientific miracles argument of the Quran has been completely debunked. Even dawah people like Ali dawah admitted it.
'scientific mistakes' like what?
Quran says women sperm come from their chest😂