The D'Alembert Betting System - How to Use It

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 2 лис 2024

КОМЕНТАРІ • 51

  • @ukspreadbetting
    @ukspreadbetting  Рік тому

    👉 Trade with our Sponsor Broker: Trade Nation www.financial-spread-betting.com/ccount/click.php?id=95 Trade sensibly! 81.7% of retail investors lose money.
    👉 We are seeking more contributors who can produce great video educational content about trading for our channel. If you think you have what it takes please get in touch by sending a message to traderATfinancial-spread-betting.com (remove the AT and substitute by @).
    👉 It seems a lot of our viewers are non-subscribers. Make sure to subscribe to our youtube channel as we upload regular videos! If you hit the “Bell” icon (🔔) you will receive a notification on youtube every time that we upload a video on our channel. Bell icon hitters are super fans of our channel 🥰

  • @timserine7899
    @timserine7899 3 роки тому +8

    Your best bet is to start with a defined bankroll and bet the same % of your bankroll on each event. In this way, your betting more when you win and less when you lose (automatically)

  • @bloodyfug
    @bloodyfug 5 років тому +34

    What if we reverse this system ?/ increasing when winning and decreasing when losing . this sounds more logical

  • @rockinray6197
    @rockinray6197 2 роки тому +7

    In book money mgmt at the track, author recommends exponential 1x,1x,3x,5x,8x.. If this would be substituted for x+1, x+2, 2x to the n+2, if that is it, runs could have larger swings. D'lambert was an finance man in early business terms. Im going to find some old books of mine on trigonometry series .. Sum of Series.. Give them a piece of my time. Ok viewed this. Two thumbs.. Only have 2 thumbs

  • @10394925
    @10394925 5 місяців тому +1

    To Make this work you shouldn't start at 1 unit or minimums. You should start at like 10 units. From there you go up or down one unit. That way you have room to go down after a period of winnings. Example you be start at $1,000. Win next trade $900. W next trade $800. W next trade $700. L next trade $800. L Next Trade $900. L Next trade $1000 W.

  • @navketan1965
    @navketan1965 Місяць тому

    Sir, For grid type where you buy & sell equal volume at each grid level,what pip distance do you suggest for different currency pairs & cross currencies.Say for a pair daily ATR is 100 pips,then what should be grid distance--50 or 70 pips?Draw down has to be kept under control.And how about grid trading for indices--as indices are more mean reverting after all.Any robots?

  • @crimsonking3873
    @crimsonking3873 4 роки тому +6

    I coded D'Alembert, the custom software I created automatically goes though the win/loss information you give it and displays all results (how much you would be up or down at any given time) that would happen using D'Alembert. The data looks really promising.

  • @jakeet999
    @jakeet999 3 роки тому +4

    This method is a good one, the problem is you will require a 50 % win ratio , I have only ever found one method involving horse racing that can produce this over many years longest losing run 8, based on favorites, bearing in mind all favorites overall win ratio is 33%

  • @MartinSage
    @MartinSage 5 років тому +30

    martingale will make u lose quickly...Period.

  • @surajoliver1
    @surajoliver1 4 роки тому +9

    If you have lots of losses then your position size will increase to large amount and you might go bankrupt. Always keep position size to 1% or 2% of total trading amount. Otherwise cannot sustain in trading.

  • @ildefonsosalcedocruz8284
    @ildefonsosalcedocruz8284 6 років тому +13

    D alembert is a A good way of making money. But there are rules. 1. Set a Target 2. Have a system of choosing red or black.

    • @Matty94
      @Matty94 5 років тому +5

      how would you make money using this? like what target would you set? and when would you stop?

  • @catherinegetare2642
    @catherinegetare2642 5 років тому +32

    D’Alembert should be x, x+1, x+2 and so on. Not x, 2x,3x and so on

  • @tracer0017
    @tracer0017 Рік тому +1

    Tried this and it didnt work for me. I started at 50 cent bets and was soon up to betting over $3 a bet just to try to recoup losses and the trend kept getting higher per bet = more and more loss. 1 or 2 wins after a few losses is not enough to get you in the black. I could see myself if I played long enough betting $20 a bet just to try to get back to positive while risking more and more money. I think you need a winning streak to end your losses. But its interesting still

  • @kristoffa3282
    @kristoffa3282 5 років тому +4

    But if your on a run wouldn’t you want to take advantage of it and keep gradually upping your bet as you win?

  • @newproduct8107
    @newproduct8107 4 роки тому +7

    The problem is a long losing streak

  • @alansolomon2863
    @alansolomon2863 Рік тому

    Applied without human greed, it probability is useful for a few hundreds per shot, but with medium to high units. Not under 25.

  • @randhirdutt5692
    @randhirdutt5692 3 роки тому +1

    Hey it looks awesome I’ll give a try for sure man thanks

  • @illuminatiaqi6130
    @illuminatiaqi6130 5 років тому +9

    I Give you a tip bet on NHL Boston Home games
    Boston wins 85% of their home games

  • @MikeKleinsteuber
    @MikeKleinsteuber 4 роки тому +6

    Do not use this methodology without having a positive edge to start with. It's a sure way to the poor house if you don't...

  • @paulwilkinson5656
    @paulwilkinson5656 6 років тому +2

    Never heard of this but it's right up my street, thanks

  • @BrockPageProductions
    @BrockPageProductions 6 років тому +4

    ⚠️ good stuff guys! Really enjoy your work! ⚠️

  • @mijanur020
    @mijanur020 6 років тому

    This system good for roulette​... football betting don't offer you higher prices, maximum bet offer around 2/3 euro, so more you loses more you have to bet.. and more you bet more you scared.

  • @mk_4567
    @mk_4567 3 роки тому +3

    I don't see a reason why this should not work 😁

  • @TheMaggsy1
    @TheMaggsy1 6 місяців тому

    This will work until you hit a really bad patch of loses . Stakes will increase too much and wipe out your bank

  • @malcolmwasher2308
    @malcolmwasher2308 2 роки тому +1

    This wont work

  • @richards1800
    @richards1800 4 роки тому +4

    If bet 4 loses and bet 5 becomes 5x and wins your not even recovering previous losses.

  • @mono-amniotictwins2580
    @mono-amniotictwins2580 3 роки тому

    Please please I need it, please tell me bustabit number trick sir

  • @5communist
    @5communist 3 роки тому

    You mast sell more in hi level but in down level you mast sell a little.When you go dawnstairs bay more and more ,if you going upsteirs bay a little.

  • @jpsabbey
    @jpsabbey 5 років тому +6

    It's pronounced dee alembear

  • @laloeastside9669
    @laloeastside9669 6 років тому +5

    A roulette bet is not 50/50. You only have a 47.4% chance of hitting one or the other on a double 00 wheel, which is the standard in most casinos, which puts you at a 2.6% disadvantage. So your calculations are completely off right off the back.

    • @jimbean1371
      @jimbean1371 5 років тому +5

      It’s not about that, you’re taking the example to literally, it’s just an example... if you’re trying to make money on roulette you’re an idiot anyway

  • @trader61
    @trader61 5 років тому +6

    No staking plan like this would work long term load of crap

  • @Nakameguro97
    @Nakameguro97 6 років тому +6

    Pronounced like D-Allen-Bear (French)

    • @crimsonking3873
      @crimsonking3873 6 років тому +1

      Its actually Italian my last name also has an apostrophe and is similar.

  • @nukrisamyurashvili3021
    @nukrisamyurashvili3021 5 років тому +5

    BS

  • @vladokvk
    @vladokvk Рік тому

    With 50/50 chance of winning, your payout is less than 2X. Still a loosing game. If you have bigger winning than 2X and 50/50 chance(market) , don't change anything. Keep betting same trade/bett over and over again

  • @lovesupreme6154
    @lovesupreme6154 5 років тому +2

    Similar to the Fibonacci system.

  • @taimoradinany1159
    @taimoradinany1159 4 роки тому +1

    Quickly loose

  • @jeremiahmazire7668
    @jeremiahmazire7668 Рік тому +1

    Sounds like a recipe for disaster!

  • @ddelruss
    @ddelruss 4 роки тому +1

    Please never do this. This is moronic.

  • @goodvibrations6
    @goodvibrations6 3 роки тому +5

    long term, you lose with every system.

  • @swapnilmali7473
    @swapnilmali7473 4 роки тому

    Paisa kon tera bap dega😂

  • @lukemiller2895
    @lukemiller2895 5 років тому +2

    So you want to increase your bet when you're losing and decrease your bet when you're winning.... 🤣🤣🤣... let us all know how that's works out lol