How Much can you earn as a Cash Game Poker player?

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 8 вер 2024

КОМЕНТАРІ • 63

  • @XoXRiver
    @XoXRiver Рік тому +7

    Very nice and informative video, thank you. The 60 buy-ins downswing sounds terrifying... Impressive win rate, congratulations!

  • @radomirpl
    @radomirpl Рік тому +1

    Thank you for this video. It helped me understand that poker is a marathon and when swinging or being b/e you just have to play your game and be tough.
    Of course, this does not mean that you should stop educating yourself or analyzing your game.
    You have to give yourself time and accept the variance, without it you lose confidence, question your strategy every now and then and just go astray.

  • @dragamoja
    @dragamoja Рік тому +3

    Great content! It's so important to have the right expectations in poker.

  • @dimitarnikov3270
    @dimitarnikov3270 Рік тому +1

    Really good content, mate! Keep up the grind and the good work! Really appreciate you!

  • @phillipdefant972
    @phillipdefant972 Рік тому +1

    awesome content as always!!!! thank you a lot. i want to go professional soon and this helps me a lot to understand everything

  • @pokerapprentice
    @pokerapprentice 3 місяці тому

    Hi from Brazil! Great video, very interesting!

  • @marcusdl5389
    @marcusdl5389 2 місяці тому

    Ottimo video! Grazie

  • @vladimirelgrande754
    @vladimirelgrande754 5 місяців тому

    Great video, thank you very much.

  • @ToLyLive
    @ToLyLive Рік тому

    Thank you for sharing!

  • @elpistolero82
    @elpistolero82 Рік тому +3

    Hi LAG. I have to agree that a stoploss is a very good idea. For me when I get to minus 4 buy-ins in a session, that is what I use as my stoploss. Do you have any thoughts on a "stop-win" where you stop playing when you are up a certain amount in a session? If I am up 6 buy-ins for example, I don't want to lose what I have won, so sometimes I will sit out from the session then also.

    • @LAGPoker
      @LAGPoker  Рік тому +2

      Hello! I normally use a stop win strategy during a long downswing, when it Is more important to take home some win for the mindset. But it's ok to use It of you feel that kind of pressure.

  • @dobuletrobule2313
    @dobuletrobule2313 Рік тому

    Excellent video. Thanks

  • @stoicpoker94
    @stoicpoker94 Рік тому

    brilliant video really insightful

  • @donchivu2726
    @donchivu2726 Рік тому

    GL Francesco, bel canale, così alleno anche un po' il mio inglese ahaha

  • @tonyhlk8182
    @tonyhlk8182 Рік тому +1

    Thanks for this video I needed it, I became a pro 4 months ago and last month I had the best month in term of income (4k2€ with RB) playing on NL50 zoom, but since february 1st I'm running like complete shit, almost 30 buy-in down for the first time ever and I don't know if I'll make 1k with RB this month. It's pretty rough but I try to keep motivated

    • @LAGPoker
      @LAGPoker  Рік тому

      As all downswing, It will pass! GL

  • @MyFukinBass
    @MyFukinBass 11 місяців тому

    Hello! Been watching your channel for a while now, really amazing content. Thank you!
    May I ask, at 7:25 you show your earnings, Is that yearly or monthly? I'm just trying to get a graps of how much a poker player like yourself would earn yearly playing part-time as you would.

    • @LAGPoker
      @LAGPoker  11 місяців тому +1

      Hello, It's a mix of various stakes on stars.com only - it's from a bankroll challenge I made on Twitch and not from my regular grinding. It took about 1.5/2 years of 2-3 hours per day.

    • @MyFukinBass
      @MyFukinBass 11 місяців тому

      @@LAGPoker thanks a ton for your answer! So if that’s not your normal grinding, would you say grinding daily is more profitable than what we see in the video or less?

  • @scott22031
    @scott22031 3 місяці тому

    How many buyins would you say is a decent bankroll to see if your winning or losing

  • @dreamdyyboi
    @dreamdyyboi Рік тому

    Nice vid! How much is the RB in that hourly calculation at for example 100nl?

  • @kemirgentv2kemirgentv287
    @kemirgentv2kemirgentv287 Рік тому

    great video! do you play gg poker? what do you think about gg poker cash table?

    • @LAGPoker
      @LAGPoker  Рік тому

      Hi! I played some volume on GG. I found the field easy, but the take gets pretty high from NL100 and above.

  • @scott22031
    @scott22031 Рік тому

    great videos have you used or can you recommend any training material or sites thamks

    • @LAGPoker
      @LAGPoker  Рік тому +1

      Hi, it really depends on your actual stake and skill level. I enjoy RunItOnce content - but it may be a bit too advanced if you are a beginner

  • @TheOnlyToast
    @TheOnlyToast Рік тому

    Is there something in particular that made you surpass Microstakes? Any things that stood out (like "Clicking moments") ?

    • @LAGPoker
      @LAGPoker  Рік тому +1

      I don't think there was a specific clicking moment! If I had to say one thing it probably was when I shifted my focus from "hitting hands" to "exploiting my opponents' leaks".

  • @phillipdefant972
    @phillipdefant972 Рік тому +1

    are you talking about 4 zoom tables at once??

    • @LAGPoker
      @LAGPoker  Рік тому

      I played 4x up to NL50 and 2 to 3x NL100 and above (most of the time)

  • @adampadubski1052
    @adampadubski1052 Рік тому

    Great video. But how many tables do You play at one time?

    • @LAGPoker
      @LAGPoker  Рік тому +1

      Hello, that was mixed 4x Zoom Off-stream and 2x Zoom during streamings on Twitch

  • @delai86
    @delai86 5 місяців тому

    hello LAG, that hourly $ 7.5 at NL10 , how much multi table u doing?

  • @stealz6593
    @stealz6593 Рік тому

    it is okay to play only 4 regular tables if after the fifth table you lose focus? or how many tables do you see as optimal

    • @LAGPoker
      @LAGPoker  Рік тому

      Hello and sorry for the late reply. The answer is as many as you can! You should grind the ones you can do with focus, but then try to increase gradually the number with time. I think 8 would be a good number for an online pro.

  • @user-fz3nn6hs7n
    @user-fz3nn6hs7n Рік тому

    which site are these results from? good video :)

    • @LAGPoker
      @LAGPoker  Рік тому

      They are from PokerStars.com - thanks!

  • @maxstar1987
    @maxstar1987 Рік тому

    what is ur twitch bro?

  • @PandaPower511
    @PandaPower511 Рік тому +1

    Correct me if I’m wrong, but assuming 30 hands is dealt live poker per hour.. then a good live player can play 7,300 hrs(220k hands) and break even?? That’s some insane variance..

    • @dreamdyyboi
      @dreamdyyboi Рік тому +1

      Thats correct, but live poker is also x10 times softer, so your edge will be bigger and therefor the swings and "downswings" more infrequent and shorter because the skilo gaps are bigger (assuming you are a crushing player)

    • @LAGPoker
      @LAGPoker  Рік тому +1

      Yes, but as @menado604 mentioned, you are supposed to have a much higher win rate in live games

    • @PandaPower511
      @PandaPower511 Рік тому

      @@LAGPoker what’s your best estimate on how many bb/ hour a good winning live reg can have (30 hand per hour).. and how many hours played can this good live reg go break even for ? Ty

  • @kemirgentv2kemirgentv287
    @kemirgentv2kemirgentv287 Рік тому

    what it is mean ''all-in adj bb/100''? can you please explain that.

    • @LAGPoker
      @LAGPoker  Рік тому

      It simulates how my bb/100 would have been, if every time I got it in before the River the pot had been chopped based on my and villain's Equity. It basically removes part of the variance.

    • @kemirgentv2kemirgentv287
      @kemirgentv2kemirgentv287 Рік тому

      @@LAGPoker then actually we should focus ''all-in adj bb'' for long term? i think it gives more realistic result about our ability.

    • @LAGPoker
      @LAGPoker  Рік тому

      @@kemirgentv2kemirgentv287 yeah, absolutely

  • @maxstar1987
    @maxstar1987 11 місяців тому

    hi, from what site this zoom results?

    • @LAGPoker
      @LAGPoker  10 місяців тому +1

      Pokerstars.com - sorry for the late reply!

  • @asd-nn8qf
    @asd-nn8qf 6 місяців тому

    is the hourly earnings on 2 tables ?

    • @LAGPoker
      @LAGPoker  6 місяців тому +1

      mix 2 to 4 zoom

  • @darylhurst1145
    @darylhurst1145 10 місяців тому

    do you offer coaching?

    • @LAGPoker
      @LAGPoker  8 місяців тому

      Hello and sorry for the very late reply. I do, but as of now I don't have any available slot.

  • @luckymaggie6594
    @luckymaggie6594 Рік тому

    Most of us are just rewards or rakeback grinders

  • @bdeliu3187
    @bdeliu3187 8 місяців тому

    Is there a reason why you have not uploaded in 10 months? Do you still play?

    • @LAGPoker
      @LAGPoker  8 місяців тому

      Hello! I'm still active but had time just to focus on my Italian Channel (XShove) and another business. Will be back on this channel early this year!

  • @switters8679
    @switters8679 Рік тому +1

    $/hr is a function of BB/100 and are inexorably linked. All of the things that you mentioned that effect bb/100 would also effect $/hr. $/hr is simply bb/100 + rb. I understand and agree with the sentiment, however if you understand what bb/100 is representing and why it is being used it can be useful when teaching or training with others as long as you are aware that it is only a piece of the puzzle (bc different people have different rb deals, thus the common denominator becomes bb/100). It can also get a little murky when you are playing different stake levels, but since databases are a thing it is easy to parse that information out as you did in this video. Literally everything you presented in this video could also be converted into bb/100.

    • @LAGPoker
      @LAGPoker  Рік тому

      the whole point of the bb/100 part of the video is: bb/100 are not the best tool to measure your skills at Poker, at least as long as we assume that the most skilled Poker player is the one who makes the most money at the end of the day - considering the same stake and possibilities obviously. In that terms, $/h is more relevant even if as much inaccurate in its measurement. As an example, in my opinion somebody who can fluently play up to 6 tables at 5bb/100 is better at Poker than somebody who cannot play more than 2 tables but keeps 10bb/100.
      More $/h is always better than less $/h, while more bb/100 is not necessarily better than less bb/100 from an overall profit perspective. That's why I think $/h is a way better measure for success in Poker.
      If you are running filters on your DB, bb/100 (or better ev bb/100) are obviously what you need to check.

    • @fenikstechnologies1173
      @fenikstechnologies1173 Рік тому +1

      I think you're taking him a bit too literally. BB/100 can obviously be a metric of success or not. However, like most stats in general, people put too much stock into it without proper context.
      Is your 10bb/100 one table or 6 tables (I'm sure you see where I'm going with that)
      And in the end, we are humans. Therefore the only thing we have to "trade" for money is our time. We can only process information so fast, and we only have so many waking hours to be productive.
      Therefore, you need to figure out what games, amount of tables, time of day, etc etc.....allows you to make the largest hourly rate.
      Very simple example, but "crushing" a game nowadays is 5bb+/100.
      But I'll take 0.5bb/100 @ a $200/400 game all day everyday.

  • @philippedemay6026
    @philippedemay6026 9 місяців тому

    hi sir, i would like to pay coaching from you, how i can contact you ? thanks

    • @LAGPoker
      @LAGPoker  8 місяців тому

      Hello and sorry for the late reply. You can contact me via mail at francesco@looseaggressive.com

  • @galitzkiy
    @galitzkiy Рік тому

    Nice topic, thanks