IJN Kawachi - Guide 010 (Human Voice)

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 1 гру 2024

КОМЕНТАРІ • 76

  • @vikkimcdonough6153
    @vikkimcdonough6153 2 роки тому +14

    1:18 - Had the _Satsumas_ been completed as dreadnoughts, they'd've had an even-less-efficient turret layout than the _Nassaus,_ and that's saying something.

  • @bificommander
    @bificommander 5 років тому +66

    Ah, the bane of my existence in World of Warships. A large slow moving target with main guns that have less range than the torpedo's of destroyers just one tier above it.

  • @Raptor747
    @Raptor747 5 років тому +43

    ...why did the IJN have repeated problems with magazine detonations in port (not due to enemy attack), especially with battleships? It's such a bizarre and serious problem to have for a navy where every capital ship is so precious and difficult to produce.

    • @BHuang92
      @BHuang92 5 років тому +39

      There were no standardized safety precautions when handling munitions. The Royal Navy has some similar incidents but didn't really seriously consider it until after Jutland. Also, the magazine is a good place for some disgruntled individual to "voice their opinions"

    • @JGCR59
      @JGCR59 Рік тому +1

      Every single WW1 era navy except the Germans and Austrians lost ships to magazine detonations. Sometimes more than one

    • @pedrofelipefreitas2666
      @pedrofelipefreitas2666 Рік тому +1

      If i had to guess, either the propellant formed dust as time passed and even a single spark/impact could ignite them, or the propellant handling practices were... Not ideal. The French had a similar problems due to both.

    • @Fulcrum205
      @Fulcrum205 7 місяців тому

      Likely crystallization of the nitrates in the propellant. That forms some extremely unstable compounds.

    • @CorePathway
      @CorePathway 6 місяців тому

      @@JGCR59 Remember the Maine!

  • @michaelsullivan6127
    @michaelsullivan6127 5 років тому +36

    Q&A -- Drach, did I mention that my uncle (USNA '30, retired 1960) was stationed at the USN Decommissioning Yard in San Diego at the time the USS Enterprise was decommed? During his time there, he managed to secure the bridge clock (8" shell casing, threaded cover with glass) from the Enterprise, including the mahogany base. The clock does not ring on the quarter and half hours, but on bells of the watch -- one bell at 1230 hrs, two at 1300, etc., all the way to eight bells at 1600, whereupon the cycle restarts. When he died in the mid-60s, he willed the clock to me. I had it cleaned and repaired, and used it on my fireplace for several years. Currently, it resides in storage in my MUCH smaller current house. It's pretty nice.....

  • @sarjim4381
    @sarjim4381 5 років тому +75

    Seems like the Settsu, while not having a long history as a dreadnought, at least served in some useful roles up until the end of WWII, and managed not to blow herself up in port.

    • @bkjeong4302
      @bkjeong4302 5 років тому

      Sar Jim
      But you don’t need a battleship to send fake radio signals. So the fact she did that role doesn’t really make her necessary.

    • @sarjim4381
      @sarjim4381 5 років тому +7

      @@bkjeong4302 I said she served in useful roles, the main role being a target ship. I never said anything about her being necessary, nor did I mention fake radio signals. Do you have difficulty understanding written English?

    • @bkjeong4302
      @bkjeong4302 5 років тому +3

      Sar Jim
      Settsu’s most famous WWII role is in sending fake radio signals as part of anti-intelligence efforts in the leadup to Pearl. I thought that was what you were referring to.

    • @ja6973
      @ja6973 4 роки тому +5

      It is humorously ironic that she could even be debatably said to have contributed more to the Japanese war effort than the Musashi.

    • @finnsvenson7570
      @finnsvenson7570 4 роки тому

      @@ja6973 Well, she was undoubtebly better designed

  • @dimdimbramantyo7666
    @dimdimbramantyo7666 5 років тому +44

    Ahh, classic japanese naval engineering. If it still have space on it, it will be a gun turret

    • @mebeasensei
      @mebeasensei 5 років тому +6

      Marcelo Henrique Soares da Silva I thought it was, if there is a mast, build the Tower of Babel on it and then add the Empire State Building for good measure.

    • @michaelt9443
      @michaelt9443 5 років тому +10

      Josefu Josturr thats more accurate to the Americans.
      Q: There is an empty space on the deck
      A: yes
      Q: why
      A: Idk
      Q: put a 20 Mil there you dipshit

    • @pedrofelipefreitas2666
      @pedrofelipefreitas2666 Рік тому

      Considering how... Modest their protection was, i think it's more accurate to say that the japanese made space for more guns, maybe that was a yankee influence of liking more guns.

  • @williampeterson333
    @williampeterson333 5 років тому +39

    I like the real voice narration better btw, I know its more work but personally just sounds more polished. Keep up the good work!

    • @michaeldy3157
      @michaeldy3157 3 роки тому +2

      I think all former robot voice videos are now human voiced.

  • @Straswa
    @Straswa 2 роки тому +1

    Great vid Drach, I wasn't aware the Japanese had more than one instance of a ship blowing up in port, I thought Mutsu was the only one.

  • @mikehunt8989
    @mikehunt8989 5 років тому +80

    have you considered getting in touch with Wargaming and seeing if they would be interested in having you create content for World Of Warships? I really thing you could be an asset for their game.

    • @finnsvenson7570
      @finnsvenson7570 4 роки тому +9

      But he wouldnt make russian ships broken, they can't have that.

  • @toddcraig6150
    @toddcraig6150 5 років тому +2

    love your videos, so much information and history keep up the great work

  • @jehb8945
    @jehb8945 3 роки тому +2

    Drachinifel: " The fore and aft and the wing guns may have had different ballistic performances but I'll consider these ships close enough for laughs to being full dreadnoughts"

  • @westcoaststacker569
    @westcoaststacker569 5 років тому

    Awesome more to watch, thanks for getting so many out today!

  • @admiralnimitz9844
    @admiralnimitz9844 5 років тому +26

    What’s with Japanese battleships blowing up in port?

    • @Drachinifel
      @Drachinifel  5 років тому +24

      They used similar ammo to the British at the start of WW1 but took longer to move away from it.

    • @tomhath8413
      @tomhath8413 3 роки тому +9

      @@Drachinifel Well, blowing up certainly moves parts of their navy away from it.

    • @NicholasAdeptus
      @NicholasAdeptus 2 роки тому +1

      @@tomhath8413 buh dum, tiss!

  • @mannibus1571
    @mannibus1571 5 років тому +31

    not sure whats better at sarcasm, the drawl english accent or the computer voice.

  • @nathan290192
    @nathan290192 3 роки тому

    Only freakin dude on youtube who's video I like before seeing them

  • @Homieman-nz6si
    @Homieman-nz6si 4 роки тому +1

    huh, considering this was teased in the War Thunder update trailer, id say i ought watch this too know what ill soon be up against in naval matches. thanks youtube recommendations!

  • @terencewong-lane4309
    @terencewong-lane4309 4 роки тому +3

    Satsuma & Aki deserve their own video treatments

  • @spookyshadowhawk6776
    @spookyshadowhawk6776 5 років тому +3

    Q&A Which Navy in the Second World War had the most effective Dive Bomber?

    • @bkjeong4302
      @bkjeong4302 5 років тому +2

      spooky shadow hawk
      Probably the USN followed by the IJN.

  • @toddwebb7521
    @toddwebb7521 4 роки тому +3

    Kawachi vs Heligoland which one would win in a battle of the Hexagonal battleships

  • @wilsonj4705
    @wilsonj4705 5 років тому +8

    Any info on that deliberately started fire on Mikasa in 1912? I can find mention of the fire but nothing on it's deliberate nature

    • @wooshme4836
      @wooshme4836 5 років тому +4

      If I'm not wrong, a revolt happened and the revolters wanted to start a small fire as a distraction. However, amid all the chaos the fire grew uncontrollable.

    • @seasirocco3063
      @seasirocco3063 3 роки тому

      A sucidal enlisted crewman set afire in the forwards main magazine.
      archive.org/stream/dailycolonist57269uvic#page/n14/mode/1up

  • @ijnkako5326
    @ijnkako5326 5 років тому +14

    QnA - Why was Tosa scuttled instead of scrapped, considering the Japanese shortage of steel?

    • @freefalcon23
      @freefalcon23 5 років тому +7

      Good question, was about to ask the same thing!

    • @mebsrea
      @mebsrea 5 років тому

      Not sure whether this applies to the Tosa specifically, but in many of the cases where ships were used as targets, they were subsequently raised and scrapped.

    • @danielkorladis7869
      @danielkorladis7869 4 роки тому +1

      @@mebsrea they might not have had the drydock space at the time

  • @bacarnal
    @bacarnal 5 місяців тому

    Still love the old intro music...

  • @stephen2567
    @stephen2567 5 років тому +3

    Video subject request: Battle of Savo Island. I find it hard to get good rounded reports of what actually happened.

  • @darrenbennett1053
    @darrenbennett1053 4 роки тому +1

    Can we please hear about the USS Tennessee?

  • @michaeldy3157
    @michaeldy3157 3 роки тому +2

    I see comments about robot voiced . But they must have been. Rerecorded with human voice , as none? Are now robot voiced that I can find.

    • @hokutoulrik7345
      @hokutoulrik7345 2 роки тому

      He has a play list of the old robo voiced videos.

  • @kevinpresley3136
    @kevinpresley3136 4 місяці тому

    As in life you have to start somewhere.

  • @thebes118
    @thebes118 5 років тому +5

    Drachinifel you play World of Warships?

    • @Drachinifel
      @Drachinifel  5 років тому +6

      Indeed

    • @estoyaqui5386
      @estoyaqui5386 5 років тому +1

      @@Drachinifel Is your clan called "SB"? If that is really you, you have solid statistics, sir!

    • @Drachinifel
      @Drachinifel  5 років тому +1

      @@estoyaqui5386 yep that's me/us :)

  • @ukaszzyka6279
    @ukaszzyka6279 4 роки тому +1

    How can a ship be a practice target and then fulfill any other roles, like being a barracks? Does it mean the gunners and the pilots missed her so much :) ?

    • @Colt45hatchback
      @Colt45hatchback 3 роки тому

      It was to be fired upon by smaller ships like destroyers, probably with inert shells (ones that dont explode)
      So it would get dents and holes, not full on explosions deep inside

  • @kidmohair8151
    @kidmohair8151 4 роки тому +3

    coal fired radio controlled ship
    ah nevermind
    why has humanity come to the conclusion that
    war is sensible

    • @bob_the_engineer1045
      @bob_the_engineer1045 3 роки тому +2

      I suspect a nation absolutely committed to never going to war will find war being brought to it, or surrendering itself without a shot being fired. Note the Swiss don't get involved in other countries' wars, but do their best to be prepared to defend themselves. No personal military experience, so make of this what you will, and I'm American, not Swiss, just bringing them up as an example.

  • @GetWarded
    @GetWarded 5 років тому +7

    USS Laffey DD - 724

    • @treq2112
      @treq2112 5 років тому +2

      The ship that wouldn't die. One of the greatest Navel stories of all time

    • @LostShipMate
      @LostShipMate 5 років тому

      USS Johnston DD - 821

    • @GetWarded
      @GetWarded 5 років тому +1

      Ryan Cargill Wrong Johnston. The famous one is DD-557

    • @LostShipMate
      @LostShipMate 5 років тому

      @@GetWarded Thats what I get for using google to look up the hull number. The Navy loved to reuse names didn't they. Wasn't the original Laffey lost in Iron Bottom sound?

    • @TheBlubertater
      @TheBlubertater 5 років тому

      @@LostShipMate Laffey DD-459, lost at Guadalcanal fighting Hiei and their fleet after sinking a few IJN destroyers herself

  • @demian7567
    @demian7567 4 роки тому

    You forgot the Schleswig Holstein

  • @simon2493
    @simon2493 4 роки тому +2

    Who is here because of War Thunder?

  • @Dannyedelman4231
    @Dannyedelman4231 5 років тому +3

    First

  • @pvb3562
    @pvb3562 2 місяці тому

    is it "setsu" or "satsu" or just "a british person who refuses to google names"?