@@Q_from_Star_Trek front tuck mount (D) fhs (B) + front tuck (D) = 0.2 CV full turn (broken connection) switch leap (C) + switch leap (repeat element, feet not fully rotated) korbut double wolf turn (D) side aerial (D) tour jete half (E) roundoff + 2.5 twist (D) = 0.2 bonus EDDDDDCB 3.0 + 1.5 CR (no dance series) + 0.4 = 4.9 For 2024 they removed her sissone + full turn backup dance series (sissone had built in deductions), adding the full turn to her switch series as a backup (less total skills to deduct). What I suspect is the backup full turn series was never credited last year (slow, heel drops, plié), but her switch + switch half is usually so solid that it never mattered until then
@@balancebeam Wouldn’t the second switch leap at 0:38 technically be a Johnson (switch leap 1/4 turn) since she didn’t get the 1/2 turn around? I don’t understand why it counted as a repeated element instead of a Johnson leap. I also think that the judges were very strict to not give her connection for the full turn into the switch leap at 0:34.
![Sabrina Voinea (ROU) 2024 Olympics EF FX (BBC) [1080p50]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/WuF-smKa4Vo/mqdefault.jpg)
![Sabrina Voinea (ROU) 2024 Olympics EF FX (BBC) [1080p50]](/img/tr.png)
![Sabrina Voinea (ROU) 2024 Olympics QF BB (BBC) [1080p50]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/qtkn360YFzI/mqdefault.jpg)
![Sabrina Voinea (ROU) 2024 Olympics QF FX (BBC) [1080p50]](/img/n.gif)
4.9 starting value? Why?
@@Q_from_Star_Trek
front tuck mount (D)
fhs (B) + front tuck (D) = 0.2 CV
full turn (broken connection)
switch leap (C) + switch leap (repeat element, feet not fully rotated)
korbut
double wolf turn (D)
side aerial (D)
tour jete half (E)
roundoff + 2.5 twist (D) = 0.2 bonus
EDDDDDCB 3.0 + 1.5 CR (no dance series) + 0.4 = 4.9
For 2024 they removed her sissone + full turn backup dance series (sissone had built in deductions), adding the full turn to her switch series as a backup (less total skills to deduct). What I suspect is the backup full turn series was never credited last year (slow, heel drops, plié), but her switch + switch half is usually so solid that it never mattered until then
@@balancebeam Wouldn’t the second switch leap at 0:38 technically be a Johnson (switch leap 1/4 turn) since she didn’t get the 1/2 turn around? I don’t understand why it counted as a repeated element instead of a Johnson leap. I also think that the judges were very strict to not give her connection for the full turn into the switch leap at 0:34.
@@lb7617 to get credited as a johnson the leap needs to pass through a straddle position, this one did not.