He doesn't have a right to video record in the USPS. The rules and regulations on the USPS website forbid him from video recording. Poster 7 gives the employees authority to kick him out Video recording is a privilege not a right.
every cop who uses the word "unfortunately" while explaining to a government employee or any other citizen our sacred rights according to our constitution (and, UNFORTUNATELY, nearly every cop does it) should be immediately suspended and re-trained at the very least. this shows a dangerous lack of understanding of our rights and is unforgivable behavior from anyone who swore an oath to defend those very rights.
i love how cops nearly always mention "people's information", as though this was some crucial piece of evidence or the big break in the case. what you choose to record or not record from public space is irrelevant. it is perfectly legal to record any "information" you see from a public space, period, including the computer screen inside a police car. only if you share that information can it become a violation of law.
I went to this post office on Saturday to get a new money order and that same lady gave me a whole run around denying to get me the money order. Went to the one on Handy Street and the employee was extremely helpful. That lady definitely needs to get fired smh.
@@ChristoTheGreekyes the poster which if you bother to read the whole thing gives the employees the right to tell you to get lost. You should look at the rules for video recording on the USPS website your wrong.
@@SR-VM Exactly!! The rules are posted under Rights & Permission. If the personnel were trained properly, this would happen... FAPA (First Amendment Protection Agency) was filming in a post office, refused to leave when told and was arrested for trespassing. FAPA (plaintiff) subsequently sued, claiming First and Fourth Amendment rights have been violated. The District of SC issued a summary judgement in favor of the Allendale Police Dept (defendant.) FAPA lost. (Medaglia v Allendale Police Dept., 1:24-533-MGL-SVH (D.S.C., November 5, 2024)
the responsibility to protect "information" in a government facility falls entirely on the government employees and the citizens whose information is at risk. obviously, if you violate someone's personal space or stick the camera in their face to do it, that can become another matter.
When did we become a country of could be, how do we know, hurt feelings, fear, and I’m uncomfortable? When did these things override the law or constitutional rights? Some people are begging to be fully controlled by our government.
Dude should've started singing her it in a song, BARNEY STYLE!! She really wasn't grasping reality 😂😂! Well maybe if I say, excuse me sir and change 1 word in my explanation that will change things smh 😂😂😂😂
Poster 7 is not the complete set of rules but only a small excerpt from the 1,176 pages of the CFR. The complete set of rules for USPS is on their website under Rights & Permission. You should read that and you will understand.
What useful information can anyone get. Card numbers are now on the the backside and no longer raised. PIN numbers alone are useless. Stop saying "Unfortunately " .
That is nothing but auditor rhetoric. Why do you blindly believe them? Here is the truth based on SCOTUS and various court rulings.. “Post offices and other government buildings are not designated or historically recognized public forums for first amendment activities such as recording, protesting.” UNC School of Govt / UNC Law School report on first amendment auditing “It is settled law that "the First Amendment does not guarantee access to property simply because it is owned or controlled by the government." Hemmatti v. United States, 564 A2d 739 (DC Ct App 1989)), citing United States Postal Service v. Greenburgh Civic Associations, 453 U.S. 114, 129 (1981). UNC School of Govt / UNC Law School report on first amendment auditing
As you can clearly read, "Post offices and other government buildings are not designated or historically recognized public forums for first amendment activities." The USPS facilities with better trained personnel enforce USPS restrictions posted under Rights & Permission. This is what happens... FAPA (First Amendment Protection Agency) was filming in a post office, refused to leave when told and was arrested for trespassing. FAPA (plaintiff) subsequently sued, claiming First and Fourth Amendment rights have been violated. The District of SC issued a summary judgement in favor of the Allendale Police Dept (defendant.) FAPA lost. (Medaglia v Allendale Police Dept., 1:24-533-MGL-SVH (D.S.C., November 5, 2024) Take note that the auditor's first amendment claim was denied.
You need to do actual research instead of blindly believing auditors. USPS rules established under Rights & Permission clearly state that you cannot photograph personnel or customers. The better trained USPS facilities enforce these rules: FAPA (First Amendment Protection Agency) was filming in a post office, refused to leave when told and was arrested for trespassing. FAPA (plaintiff) subsequently sued, claiming First and Fourth Amendment rights have been violated. The District of SC issued a summary judgement in favor of the Allendale Police Dept (defendant.) FAPA lost. (Medaglia v Allendale Police Dept., 1:24-533-MGL-SVH (D.S.C., November 5, 2024) As you can clearly read, the first amendment claim was denied, so your premise, "the constitution says otherwise" is nothing but misleading auditor rhetoric. I recommend reading UNC School of Govt / UNC Law School 64-page report on first amendment auditing. You will see that much of what auditors say about inside govt buildings is baseless rhetoric.
@stopauditorgrifting-l8h your wrong. The DHS says completely otherwise. Federal law says you're wrong. 1st amendment says you're wrong. We the people have the right to film any public offical in the course of their duties. Especially while on public property being recorded from public property. That been in effect since 1775!
She does not care about the customers. This is all about her. The solution is that her superiors see this video followed up with her termination. She is not bright enough to resign.
@@knowtheforum USPS "rules" do not override the Constitution. The First Amendment. She does not have the authority to issue a trespass. She has ZERO authority. There was no reason to trespass someone who was 100% in the right legally to record her in the course of her duties which she obviously cannot handle. She was not hired for her qualifications which is clear. She deserves to be terminated sooner rather than later. She is incapable to hold a government position.
I have never understood this - what use is the PIN without the card details? Also, do you think that if she is married, do you think that he has lost the power of speech?
There’s a pretty easy way to fix all that don’t tell anybody that you are recording and then they can’t accuse you of anything. They need evidence that you are recording so stop telling them that you’re recording and giving them any evidence.
The Self Entitlement and Arogance of these people is sickening , the fact they think they can Enforce their Feelings on a law abiding citizen ,again shows how Self Entitled , Ignorant, and Arrogant these people are.
Here is an example: FAPA (First Amendment Protection Agency) was filming in a post office, refused to leave when told and was arrested for trespassing. FAPA (plaintiff) subsequently sued, claiming First and Fourth Amendment rights have been violated. The District of SC issued a summary judgement in favor of the Allendale Police Dept (defendant.) FAPA lost. (Medaglia v Allendale Police Dept., 1:24-533-MGL-SVH (D.S.C., November 5, 2024) The court rejected his first amendment claim.
Another example... Auditor Wigginton was issued a trespass from USPS for recording and subsequently arrested. Wigginton (plantiff) filed a first amendment suit against USPS (defendant.) The case Wigginton v. United States Postal Services was closed on October 31, 2012, after the defendants' (USPS) motions to dismiss were granted. Wigginton lost. So this court is corrupt too? Do you have any idea of the concept of legal precedent? So in your world any court that enforces govt agency rules is corrupt? Keep in mind that the right of govt agencies to establish rules for their facility is based on SCOTUS rulings. The fact that govt buildings are NOT public forums for the first amendment was also based on SCOTUS rulings. Seems to me is that you want to make up your own rules. The founding fathers addressed that when they establishes SCOTUS as the legal authority to determine constitutionality. We are a country of laws.
@knowtheforum because she is a Rude , Uneducated , Ignorant public servant , who tries to Enforce her FEELINGS on law abiding citizens . The Self Entitlement a person must have to believe they get to Enforce their FEELINGS on law abiding citizens . A law abiding citizen is not responsible for the unhinged reaction of another person !
The USPS employee came to America for the freedoms we are all supposed to enjoy, but then she wants to deny YOUR rights. It makes no sense.
Keep revisiting until this ignorant muppet gets it!!!!
He doesn't have a right to video record in the USPS. The rules and regulations on the USPS website forbid him from video recording. Poster 7 gives the employees authority to kick him out
Video recording is a privilege not a right.
She’s funny
@@SR-VM. That’s so wrong. So uneducated. No wonder this country elected a convicted criminal to “lead”
@SR-VM u r wrong señor muppet!!!
every cop who uses the word "unfortunately" while explaining to a government employee or any other citizen our sacred rights according to our constitution (and, UNFORTUNATELY, nearly every cop does it) should be immediately suspended and re-trained at the very least. this shows a dangerous lack of understanding of our rights and is unforgivable behavior from anyone who swore an oath to defend those very rights.
yes Nothing new I am from Houston TX.
At least the cop said unfortunately for YOU
You’ll never get her to understand the constitution. But this and but that….there’s no buts.
I think the clown with the camera needs to be educated on the constitution. Video recording is a privilege not a right.n
That has no applicability inside govt buildings because SCOTUS has established them as nonpublic forums wherein the first amendment is restricted.
ironic that the cop has to explain this over and over to someone obviously from asia who barely speaks english.
he failed 2 educated her
She needs to go
i love how cops nearly always mention "people's information", as though this was some crucial piece of evidence or the big break in the case. what you choose to record or not record from public space is irrelevant. it is perfectly legal to record any "information" you see from a public space, period, including the computer screen inside a police car. only if you share that information can it become a violation of law.
UNCOMFORTABLE the omega level spell of America.
Thumbs up to this officer.👍
I think you could legally complain the music wasn't customer neutral and probably against policy😅
There’s no getting through to some people holy crap!
I went to this post office on Saturday to get a new money order and that same lady gave me a whole run around denying to get me the money order. Went to the one on Handy Street and the employee was extremely helpful. That lady definitely needs to get fired smh.
"unfortunately"
any odds on whether she calls cops again on a revisit?
Lol this was the re visit. Last time I helped her put up posters on the wall...
@@ChristoTheGreekyes the poster which if you bother to read the whole thing gives the employees the right to tell you to get lost. You should look at the rules for video recording on the USPS website your wrong.
Customer calla police
@@ChristoTheGreek If she was trained properly she should have issued you a trespass order and if you did not leave you should have been arrested.
@@SR-VM Exactly!! The rules are posted under Rights & Permission. If the personnel were trained properly, this would happen...
FAPA (First Amendment Protection Agency) was filming in a post office, refused to leave when told and was arrested for trespassing. FAPA (plaintiff) subsequently sued, claiming First and Fourth Amendment rights have been violated. The District of SC issued a summary judgement in favor of the Allendale Police Dept (defendant.) FAPA lost. (Medaglia v Allendale Police Dept., 1:24-533-MGL-SVH (D.S.C., November 5, 2024)
Love your reporting Christo. Great to watch you out and about. Xxx
The citizens of Greenland have a good reason to be uncomfortable. 😮
Maybe shea needa go backa norff kowea?
shes from the philiphine NK will not take her
the responsibility to protect "information" in a government facility falls entirely on the government employees and the citizens whose information is at risk. obviously, if you violate someone's personal space or stick the camera in their face to do it, that can become another matter.
Why do the clowns always say unfourtrinally there is nothing they can do???
Aww they are " uncomfortable ". 😮
When did we become a country of could be, how do we know, hurt feelings, fear, and I’m uncomfortable? When did these things override the law or constitutional rights? Some people are begging to be fully controlled by our government.
Participation trophies. Now no one knows how to lose.
And when you or your kids end upnon UA-cam from one of these recording fools, we shall see how you feel.
keep up the heat
And don't pass go and collect 200 go right to prison where all the other auditors been headed.
CHRISTO THE GREEK 👍😁🙏🇺🇸
Wow, PD educated post office 😂
If she actually knows, she needs FIRED
Wow. Her job is also to tell the customer's everything is fine..
this is 1drama beach shes not going to stop till the Leo see it her way no customers said a damn words
Dude should've started singing her it in a song, BARNEY STYLE!! She really wasn't grasping reality 😂😂! Well maybe if I say, excuse me sir and change 1 word in my explanation that will change things smh 😂😂😂😂
NO PRIVACY in public
Yasou!
💪🇨🇦
She's PROVING she's not qualified to work for us
The clown with the camera is proving he's unable to read English. Sentences end with a period l not halfway before it.
I think that's Ming Ling in disguise. That's why she doesn't want you to film 😂😂😂 T.A.C.
haha tell flex you found it
And then the insults and threats start….. good grief a bunch of postal cowards
I really think she got it this time though.
I had my business at 90 Bayard St 10 years ago next to this post office.... good memories, thank you
Hey cra cra...no customer told you nothing...stop lying
Whoa weird to see my town on UA-cam 😂
please subscribe
Ive heard justice is blind but blind guy is blind of rights
Any federal postal employee who doesn’t know the law should not even be working there poster seven clearly states you’re allowed to record in public
Poster 7 is not the complete set of rules but only a small excerpt from the 1,176 pages of the CFR. The complete set of rules for USPS is on their website under Rights & Permission. You should read that and you will understand.
@ ok I will thanks
When is your next court date?
Is this a post office or a club? This video got me dancing in my seat😂 first post office video I've seen with music like that
You made chop suey out of her😂
Tell them their cameras make YOU uncomfortable
Gotta love when they cam back😅
Does she not realize she's ON CAMERA lieing😅
OMG! 🤣🤣
All the generations after boomer have been failed... not only parents but educating
💪🏼
She escaped the nail parlor
💙👍
You should not be able to work in a post office without being a citizen if she was she should have read the constitution to get her citizenship
And shout out to other customers backing you up
It's not "Unfortunately" It's "Fortunately It's not Illegal", It's not even Fortunately or Unfortunately...It's the FIRST Admendment..AMEN!
It's not illegal till he's told to leave which he should of been and refused then it's trespassing and then it's illegal
USPS facilities, like most govt agencies, is a nonpublic forum wherein the first amendment is restricted.
What useful information can anyone get. Card numbers are now on the the backside and no longer raised. PIN numbers alone are useless. Stop saying "Unfortunately " .
she needs 21 consecutive audits to get it.
ma'am, they were comfortable when they waled in. now you are making them unhappy by fire starting them.
Yee haw!
Did that public servant say he not supposed to record in here because we live in America?
USPS rules say that you cannot photograph staff or customers.
@knowtheforum the constitution says otherwise
That is nothing but auditor rhetoric. Why do you blindly believe them? Here is the truth based on SCOTUS and various court rulings..
“Post offices and other government buildings are not designated or historically recognized public forums for first amendment activities such as recording, protesting.” UNC School of Govt / UNC Law School report on first amendment auditing
“It is settled law that "the First Amendment does not guarantee access to property simply because it is owned or controlled by the government." Hemmatti v. United States, 564 A2d 739 (DC Ct App 1989)), citing United States Postal Service v. Greenburgh Civic Associations, 453 U.S. 114, 129 (1981). UNC School of Govt / UNC Law School report on first amendment auditing
As you can clearly read, "Post offices and other government buildings are not designated or historically recognized public forums for first amendment activities." The USPS facilities with better trained personnel enforce USPS restrictions posted under Rights & Permission. This is what happens...
FAPA (First Amendment Protection Agency) was filming in a post office, refused to leave when told and was arrested for trespassing. FAPA (plaintiff) subsequently sued, claiming First and Fourth Amendment rights have been violated. The District of SC issued a summary judgement in favor of the Allendale Police Dept (defendant.) FAPA lost. (Medaglia v Allendale Police Dept., 1:24-533-MGL-SVH (D.S.C., November 5, 2024)
Take note that the auditor's first amendment claim was denied.
You need to do actual research instead of blindly believing auditors. USPS rules established under Rights & Permission clearly state that you cannot photograph personnel or customers. The better trained USPS facilities enforce these rules:
FAPA (First Amendment Protection Agency) was filming in a post office, refused to leave when told and was arrested for trespassing. FAPA (plaintiff) subsequently sued, claiming First and Fourth Amendment rights have been violated. The District of SC issued a summary judgement in favor of the Allendale Police Dept (defendant.) FAPA lost. (Medaglia v Allendale Police Dept., 1:24-533-MGL-SVH (D.S.C., November 5, 2024)
As you can clearly read, the first amendment claim was denied, so your premise, "the constitution says otherwise" is nothing but misleading auditor rhetoric. I recommend reading UNC School of Govt / UNC Law School 64-page report on first amendment auditing. You will see that much of what auditors say about inside govt buildings is baseless rhetoric.
@stopauditorgrifting-l8h your wrong. The DHS says completely otherwise. Federal law says you're wrong. 1st amendment says you're wrong. We the people have the right to film any public offical in the course of their duties. Especially while on public property being recorded from public property. That been in effect since 1775!
❤❤❤
Keep revisiting until she gets it!!!
capturing it, is not illegal. using the information for nefarious purposes is when it becomes illegal!
She does not care about the customers. This is all about her. The solution is that her superiors see this video followed up with her termination. She is not bright enough to resign.
She needs to be trained better. She should have issued a trespass for him violating USPS rules.
@@knowtheforum USPS "rules" do not override the Constitution. The First Amendment. She does not have the authority to issue a trespass. She has ZERO authority. There was no reason to trespass someone who was 100% in the right legally to record her in the course of her duties which she obviously cannot handle. She was not hired for her qualifications which is clear. She deserves to be terminated sooner rather than later. She is incapable to hold a government position.
I have never understood this - what use is the PIN without the card details? Also, do you think that if she is married, do you think that he has lost the power of speech?
There’s a pretty easy way to fix all that don’t tell anybody that you are recording and then they can’t accuse you of anything. They need evidence that you are recording so stop telling them that you’re recording and giving them any evidence.
Love you long time.
YOU riled up the public.. YOU should be fired
The Self Entitlement and Arogance of these people is sickening , the fact they think they can Enforce their Feelings on a law abiding citizen ,again shows how Self Entitled , Ignorant, and Arrogant these people are.
Since the auditor is violating USPS rules, he should have been issued a trespass.
@knowtheforum 😂😂😂
Here is an example:
FAPA (First Amendment Protection Agency) was filming in a post office, refused to leave when told and was arrested for trespassing. FAPA (plaintiff) subsequently sued, claiming First and Fourth Amendment rights have been violated. The District of SC issued a summary judgement in favor of the Allendale Police Dept (defendant.) FAPA lost. (Medaglia v Allendale Police Dept., 1:24-533-MGL-SVH (D.S.C., November 5, 2024)
The court rejected his first amendment claim.
@knowtheforum corruption runs deep within our Public servants , including Judges and Prosecutors !
Another example...
Auditor Wigginton was issued a trespass from USPS for recording and subsequently arrested. Wigginton (plantiff) filed a first amendment suit against USPS (defendant.) The case Wigginton v. United States Postal Services was closed on October 31, 2012, after the defendants' (USPS) motions to dismiss were granted. Wigginton lost.
So this court is corrupt too? Do you have any idea of the concept of legal precedent?
So in your world any court that enforces govt agency rules is corrupt? Keep in mind that the right of govt agencies to establish rules for their facility is based on SCOTUS rulings. The fact that govt buildings are NOT public forums for the first amendment was also based on SCOTUS rulings.
Seems to me is that you want to make up your own rules. The founding fathers addressed that when they establishes SCOTUS as the legal authority to determine constitutionality. We are a country of laws.
This lady needs to e fired !
Get a job in the private sector lady .
For what?
@knowtheforum because she is a Rude , Uneducated , Ignorant public servant , who tries to Enforce her FEELINGS on law abiding citizens . The Self Entitlement a person must have to believe they get to Enforce their FEELINGS on law abiding citizens .
A law abiding citizen is not responsible for the unhinged reaction of another person !
In England the adverts are really disturbing this video
doh nooo you know lou seh.geh tou hea
btw.....you could use a tele lense
Your pervious job
Post office auditing is still a thing? I thought this was 2025, not 2018.
Be better.
I don’t care what the law says. Or the rules.
No recording aloud.
Idiot.
Horrible little woman
He can no take picturaaaa he here 2 our just be like my cousin. Way To long. He go now!!
"me love you long time"