I wonder if the results are skewed by the fact that participants were willing to meet someone and talk to someone who disagrees? My sense is this could signal an openness they have. While the people who view those disagree as "the enemy" would not even be willing to meet. Even so I love this project and hope that it's expanded.
That's most probably true. Hence, this should been seen as a solution for those who are in fact willing to listen to different opinions. This doesn't work for everyone, but it doesn't have to. Those who do not want to engage in discussions need different solutions, and maybe in some years we will find a solution for them, too.
Political tinder. Genius. People always say about things designed to prove a point, “at least we’re talking about it, that’s a start”. But no one has specifically started something to get people talking. This is a great idea, and individual one on one talking might just be the best way to heal the rift of division the world is in nowadays
Couldn't agree with you more. Society seems to have forgotten that it's ok to disagree and still be respectful. Also send people need to be reminded that just because someone disagrees with you that they are not necessarily the enemy. We are all human and would do well to remember no one is perfect and that's ok.
one thing they haven't realised: basic psychology says that openness to experience dictates political views in individuals to a great extent. Liberals are more open to experience (openness) than conservative right wingers. POINT: Only people with a fairly reasonable level of openness would sign up to this test hence from the BEGINNING it had already filtered out a lot of people who would have serious differences of opinion that this test would be unsuccessful on. Imagine asking a closed minded person if they wanted to take part in some strange experiment they had never heard of to meet random members of the public they had never met and who they thoroughly disagreed with They would categorically say NO CHANCE. I would argue that the fact the people got on in this test is due to this modicum of openness both to doing the test and to changing their minds.
We see the same type of phenomenon here in the States with opinion polls. The vast majority don't agree with or support Trump, but the only ones who have or take the time to answer surveys about him are his supporters. So polls get pulled out saying that the approval is close, when in reality most don't support him, but they just don't feel the need to waste time on anything that says his name on it. They've been exhausted and numbed to it.
id have to disagree with you completely, I am extremely close minded and I would love to do something like this. I don't want my opinion changed but I DO want to learn and understand how the other side sees things because I think its beneficial to everybody. Having a strong opinion should mean that you do a lot of research and are not swayed by having an opposite voice arguing your opinion because fact trumps opinion and this applies to either side.
@@ironturkey Unfortunately facts are subjective these days, and anybody can find "evidence" that supports their opinion so they can parade it around as facts if they research long enough or do so with a bias they are seeking to confirm. Flat earthers, historical revisionists, and climate deniers are a prime example of this. I'm saying this in general, but for you specifically I would ask why you would admit to being "extremely close minded" and then say you would love doing something like this? Just to argue? If you go into it with the expectation of not being open there's no way you'll be open, so if you're wrong about something, as we all are in some way, you won't learn from it. And what makes you "strong opinion" fact and not someone else's? Wisdom is only found by constantly seeking new perspectives that change ones views, clinging to those views only leaves one in ignorance. All truly intelligent people through history have agreed with a single statement. "All I know is that I know nothing."
People are good. Corruption is bad. Get the corrupt out of politics and the people will work it out. Special interests and greed set the whole world afire. Fix this and fix it all.
Naive thinking. Politicians are elected by the people, they are raised and educated by the same society (a politician literally represent the society and it's values) . As for corruption, it is part of the dark side of humanity (it will always be there) . Ps: Acting "good" when you have no power is of little moral value. Your real character is shown by the choices you make when you have power.
@@acsiata Narcissism, and thus, sociopathy is concentrated whereever power is. Politicians are not a reflection of the people they represent, they are a representation of people who seek power. 4 - 6% of the general population are sociopaths. This is concentrated and magnified by politics and exploited by other criminal sociopaths in a self enrichment cycle that destroys the common people who becomes pawns and slaves to the angels of our darker nature.
@@acsiata Politicians aren't elected by the people. The options are controlled and limited. They aren't raised in the same society, they grow up outside the normal experiences of the average citizen. Afluenza is a recognized disease, and it's logical to assume they suffer from it. That causes a whole different set of values. Values themselves are a very complicated philosophical topic that you REALLY shouldn't throw around lightly in a YT comment, especially when speaking in absolutes and using words like "literally." Corruption isn't a natural human trait of humanity, it's a natural trait of oppressive systems. Nothing more. It won't always be there, or it would have been there from the beginning. There was a HUGE amount of time where humanity had no place or need for corruption, or any way to implement it. As for your ps, that gets into ethics. Another philosophical topic that has been debated for hundreds of years. I hate to say it, but all the philosophers that spent lifetimes wrestling with just that one topic all came to the exact opposite conclusions you have. I don't hold it against you though, because you simply repeat the same thing others say even though they haven't actually looked into it. But if you actually read into it I'm sure you will find the many volumes that have been written on these topics. Hint: Don't listen to second rate psychiatrists like Peterson who aren't qualified to comment on fields they don't know or understand. Everybody who did all the work is long dead and don't have YT channels, you'll have to do some reading.
@@1337liteproductions Bad people love power, money, and worship both. They gain access to the treasuries through politics. Dirty business bribes access from the politicians and a feeding frenzy ensues until there is nothing left. The people are kept as clueless slaves until it's too late. Vampires working together...mankind are the cattle.
Oh my god I love it’s it’s amazing! I love having discussions like this but it’s so difficult to find people who disagree and are willing to have in depth discussion with me. I wish there was a way to join this in Australia.
Just like the ancient Greeks, used to meet in the public Stoa to discuss matters of heart, politics, art, science and so grew their knowledge and temperament. It's a shame that human beings have to keep re-learning the basics of life. This is a fantastic example of where we should All be today, working and learning Together, not being divided. What a great experiment! Thank you
I was going to say a bloodbath, before even watching the video. But then I saw in the description that it was Europeans and not Americans. Over there I'm betting that they came to understandings and realized they weren't that different. Over on this side of the pond they would run out of bodybags within the first 15 seconds.
The main thing that affects our lives is money. Then greed, power, control and corruption. We are for sure social, but we also have to think of our survival. The survival instincts are what kicks in. Factor in that survival and living is our number one principal, followed by sexual urges, in order to reproduce, our complexities are biased and always will be. Who ever manages to dominate, will influence. Following a structure of life that reduces the need to think and have things taken out of our hands is the reason for the mass electing leadership. Leadership takes skills in a number of ways, even if it means lying to its supporters. This is where we get conflict. If you ever want to know a truth and what is right or wrong, you can use your human primitive instincts. Gut feelings for example. If you need to identify how easy life could be, you only have to look at the order of everything else that lives in our world. That pretty much follows the simplest solution. We have our answers to how to live and how to survive, but we choose to ignore the world around us, because we choose to question everything and change everything. Add to that, the businesses that wish to exploit and ply us needless things. Our evolution has given us much and taken away a lot. We are born, but do not choose to, we live, and try to find a path through the maze, and we die, asking what all that was about and with nothing. If we chose a simple life and lived off the land, rather than our 'fake' world that offers a multitude of distractions and influences, we would certainly do nothing but be social and interact. It's about understanding that we are manipulated and easily exploited. Out intelligence is our weakness. The psychologists amongst us would know this and the Governments would invest in this to manage the masses. Today we are constantly attacked by an onslaught of things that target us and aim to divide. We like the idea of this topic because we identify with it, recognise and yearn for it, but in reality, like the experiment it is, it will fizzle and die. The system has plans to diminish our personalities, our thoughts, possibly because of food shortages, land space, energy usage, pollution, any number of things, where culling is still a necessity but in a discreet method. In the long run, the way technology is going, they'll also most likely turn us into a cyborg, because our behaviour rebels, has different opinions and makes overall the process of following one direction difficult. Bottom line, in alignment with the idea, we do need to all follow the same path and same route. We should not have conflict, but we'd find that boring and need to push against boundaries to break new thresholds, but again, we are only going around in circles. It's an endless debate and we will continue as we are until we hit a reset point. In the past, that has been a war or an epidemic that takes us back. We are our own worst enemies and destroying the world we live on daily is the most amazing thing. We do actually work collectively, in destroying ourselves. The complete run down of humanity, I hope you and others realise the quest for harmony is a pipe dream.
@Francesco Salvatore Yeah, right. With all that over the top politically correctness and all the invented rights you are right on the money with "fascism"
I absolutely like this idea. I would love to participate some day, it sounds interesting and fun. My Country Talks should become an annual celebration of the freedom of speech and democracy on which we can all participate in a one-on-one conversation with someone we happen to disagree with.
Can I say politics affect people in mostly negative ways. People in power can't escape the temptation of corruption, people being governed become divided even when they, without politics, would have been great friends.
So, what about a new project: "America Talks?" Not necessarily just the USA: It would be good to include North, South and Central Americans. Who's in favour of this idea?
Greeks do that all the time, everywhere, with strangers or not. This is why they stay so many hours for a coffee or diner. Is this good? Is this bad? We enjoy it though...
The problem is the *HUGE* numbers of people who aren't open to discussing things they disagree with, who would rather just throw milkshakes than engage and risk having their mind changed.
Don't worry too much about the "huge numbers" for now. You only need a relatively small critical tipping point percentage within homogenous groups to bring about catalytic change.
I was just thinking the other day about the them and the us mentality between democrats and republicans in the usa. I was thinking how we as a society have to stop the them and us and start just listening. Love this. I hope there will be a World version. I would participate.
This is awesome... here comes the but... buuuut the participants are people who were willing to "argue" and have a conversation as well as an open mind. Being an American I see people all the time who talk about their opinions but don't listen to the opinions of others, they simply wait for their turn to talk. I'm curious how this would go with people who are "radical" and steadfast in their beliefs.
I don't think it would, people are nicer that you would think. I think that people see the extremes on social media and think it would be like that in real life. I don't think so. Like he said, it's different when you're face to face, no audience.
What has gone wrong with society, to make these kind of interactions 'a novelty '?? People talking, discussing issues used to be normal... instead of whining, screaming, making death threats or 'disengaging' from conversations and walking off offended and sueing the other person, - just because someone disagrees with your opinion...
@Schönling G Wunderbar To talk and discuss/debate issues, rather than scream at each other used to be normal! You are either very young or you were already then deprived of a normal/reasonable/intelligent upbringing.
@@schonlingg.wunderbar2985 I don't have to 'look up statistics', ha ha, I was thete (in 'the past') and it was a LOT more polite, reasoned and considerate. People ACTUALLY listened to each other MORE, considered each other's argument and replied with a counter-argument, instead of attacking each other (verbally or otherwise), if there was a clash of opinions.
So much for lefties "saving the planet" by combatting "climate change". No, they just want OTHER people to do the work. They think they are more equal than others.
Funny that Steven crowder does the same thing and gets blacklisted and demonetized by UA-cam. Try searching for Steven crowders change my mind series...good luck finding it.
Matt Greek ESASC widely available. Go to the search bar, type in Steven crowder change my mind, and you’ll see blaze tv segments a bunch of other channels and way down at the bottom Steven crowders channel. I am literally seeing this happen right now, so don’t say I’m lying.
@@forsaken841 you are lying. I'm on his channel right now, where all his videos are, right the way up to the one where he left youtube. You're either lying or you don't know how to type his name into a UA-cam search bar. Embarrassing.
This comment section is full of THE EXACT KIND of imbecilic, liberal, stupidity, balderdash, and douchebaggery that I would expect, given it's title. What a pack of disgusting, abysmally ignorant, scum bags and fools there are, who have the audacity to voice their DANGEROUSLY STUPID opinions!! You'd THINK that the fools who know NOTHING about the REAL World, would have just, barely, a modicum of SENSE, enough to understand that they know NOTHING, but NOPE!! They're actually THAT stupid!
I wonder if the results are skewed by the fact that participants were willing to meet someone and talk to someone who disagrees? My sense is this could signal an openness they have. While the people who view those disagree as "the enemy" would not even be willing to meet. Even so I love this project and hope that it's expanded.
Torval T Haus Exactly
I know what you mean but what's the problem? At last, they met people with different opinions anyway and not similar ones
That's most probably true. Hence, this should been seen as a solution for those who are in fact willing to listen to different opinions. This doesn't work for everyone, but it doesn't have to. Those who do not want to engage in discussions need different solutions, and maybe in some years we will find a solution for them, too.
We need to launch this program in our country South Korea where people are very much divided and hateful by two political parties.
you are right. but still these people go home afterwards and might influence their friends or family abou new opinions. It's like spreading seeds :)
This is so extraordinary and wonderful! I wish I had known this and could have joined!
I hope there will be more of this.
Political tinder. Genius. People always say about things designed to prove a point, “at least we’re talking about it, that’s a start”. But no one has specifically started something to get people talking. This is a great idea, and individual one on one talking might just be the best way to heal the rift of division the world is in nowadays
This is exactly and I mean EXACTLY what we need!
Couldn't agree with you more. Society seems to have forgotten that it's ok to disagree and still be respectful. Also send people need to be reminded that just because someone disagrees with you that they are not necessarily the enemy. We are all human and would do well to remember no one is perfect and that's ok.
one thing they haven't realised: basic psychology says that openness to experience dictates political views in individuals to a great extent. Liberals are more open to experience (openness) than conservative right wingers.
POINT: Only people with a fairly reasonable level of openness would sign up to this test hence from the BEGINNING it had already filtered out a lot of people who would have serious differences of opinion that this test would be unsuccessful on.
Imagine asking a closed minded person if they wanted to take part in some strange experiment they had never heard of to meet random members of the public they had never met and who they thoroughly disagreed with They would categorically say NO CHANCE.
I would argue that the fact the people got on in this test is due to this modicum of openness both to doing the test and to changing their minds.
We see the same type of phenomenon here in the States with opinion polls. The vast majority don't agree with or support Trump, but the only ones who have or take the time to answer surveys about him are his supporters. So polls get pulled out saying that the approval is close, when in reality most don't support him, but they just don't feel the need to waste time on anything that says his name on it. They've been exhausted and numbed to it.
id have to disagree with you completely, I am extremely close minded and I would love to do something like this. I don't want my opinion changed but I DO want to learn and understand how the other side sees things because I think its beneficial to everybody. Having a strong opinion should mean that you do a lot of research and are not swayed by having an opposite voice arguing your opinion because fact trumps opinion and this applies to either side.
@@ironturkey Unfortunately facts are subjective these days, and anybody can find "evidence" that supports their opinion so they can parade it around as facts if they research long enough or do so with a bias they are seeking to confirm. Flat earthers, historical revisionists, and climate deniers are a prime example of this. I'm saying this in general, but for you specifically I would ask why you would admit to being "extremely close minded" and then say you would love doing something like this? Just to argue? If you go into it with the expectation of not being open there's no way you'll be open, so if you're wrong about something, as we all are in some way, you won't learn from it. And what makes you "strong opinion" fact and not someone else's? Wisdom is only found by constantly seeking new perspectives that change ones views, clinging to those views only leaves one in ignorance. All truly intelligent people through history have agreed with a single statement. "All I know is that I know nothing."
People are good. Corruption is bad. Get the corrupt out of politics and the people will work it out. Special interests and greed set the whole world afire. Fix this and fix it all.
Naive thinking. Politicians are elected by the people, they are raised and educated by the same society (a politician literally represent the society and it's values) . As for corruption, it is part of the dark side of humanity (it will always be there) . Ps: Acting "good" when you have no power is of little moral value. Your real character is shown by the choices you make when you have power.
@@acsiata Narcissism, and thus, sociopathy is concentrated whereever power is. Politicians are not a reflection of the people they represent, they are a representation of people who seek power. 4 - 6% of the general population are sociopaths. This is concentrated and magnified by politics and exploited by other criminal sociopaths in a self enrichment cycle that destroys the common people who becomes pawns and slaves to the angels of our darker nature.
@@acsiata Politicians aren't elected by the people. The options are controlled and limited. They aren't raised in the same society, they grow up outside the normal experiences of the average citizen. Afluenza is a recognized disease, and it's logical to assume they suffer from it. That causes a whole different set of values. Values themselves are a very complicated philosophical topic that you REALLY shouldn't throw around lightly in a YT comment, especially when speaking in absolutes and using words like "literally." Corruption isn't a natural human trait of humanity, it's a natural trait of oppressive systems. Nothing more. It won't always be there, or it would have been there from the beginning. There was a HUGE amount of time where humanity had no place or need for corruption, or any way to implement it. As for your ps, that gets into ethics. Another philosophical topic that has been debated for hundreds of years. I hate to say it, but all the philosophers that spent lifetimes wrestling with just that one topic all came to the exact opposite conclusions you have. I don't hold it against you though, because you simply repeat the same thing others say even though they haven't actually looked into it. But if you actually read into it I'm sure you will find the many volumes that have been written on these topics. Hint: Don't listen to second rate psychiatrists like Peterson who aren't qualified to comment on fields they don't know or understand. Everybody who did all the work is long dead and don't have YT channels, you'll have to do some reading.
@@Avitaser lmao you're using all these big words and metaphors but nothing you've said is substantive at all.
@@1337liteproductions Bad people love power, money, and worship both. They gain access to the treasuries through politics. Dirty business bribes access from the politicians and a feeding frenzy ensues until there is nothing left. The people are kept as clueless slaves until it's too late. Vampires working together...mankind are the cattle.
Oh my god I love it’s it’s amazing! I love having discussions like this but it’s so difficult to find people who disagree and are willing to have in depth discussion with me. I wish there was a way to join this in Australia.
Just like the ancient Greeks, used to meet in the public Stoa to discuss matters of heart, politics, art, science and so grew their knowledge and temperament. It's a shame that human beings have to keep re-learning the basics of life. This is a fantastic example of where we should All be today, working and learning Together, not being divided. What a great experiment! Thank you
I was going to say a bloodbath, before even watching the video. But then I saw in the description that it was Europeans and not Americans. Over there I'm betting that they came to understandings and realized they weren't that different. Over on this side of the pond they would run out of bodybags within the first 15 seconds.
Brilliant, heartwarming and encouraging!
Hate and prejudice can only get us so far. Let's move toward understanding, for that is the only way that we can achieve harmony.
The main thing that affects our lives is money. Then greed, power, control and corruption. We are for sure social, but we also have to think of our survival. The survival instincts are what kicks in. Factor in that survival and living is our number one principal, followed by sexual urges, in order to reproduce, our complexities are biased and always will be. Who ever manages to dominate, will influence. Following a structure of life that reduces the need to think and have things taken out of our hands is the reason for the mass electing leadership. Leadership takes skills in a number of ways, even if it means lying to its supporters. This is where we get conflict. If you ever want to know a truth and what is right or wrong, you can use your human primitive instincts. Gut feelings for example. If you need to identify how easy life could be, you only have to look at the order of everything else that lives in our world. That pretty much follows the simplest solution. We have our answers to how to live and how to survive, but we choose to ignore the world around us, because we choose to question everything and change everything. Add to that, the businesses that wish to exploit and ply us needless things. Our evolution has given us much and taken away a lot. We are born, but do not choose to, we live, and try to find a path through the maze, and we die, asking what all that was about and with nothing. If we chose a simple life and lived off the land, rather than our 'fake' world that offers a multitude of distractions and influences, we would certainly do nothing but be social and interact. It's about understanding that we are manipulated and easily exploited. Out intelligence is our weakness. The psychologists amongst us would know this and the Governments would invest in this to manage the masses. Today we are constantly attacked by an onslaught of things that target us and aim to divide. We like the idea of this topic because we identify with it, recognise and yearn for it, but in reality, like the experiment it is, it will fizzle and die. The system has plans to diminish our personalities, our thoughts, possibly because of food shortages, land space, energy usage, pollution, any number of things, where culling is still a necessity but in a discreet method. In the long run, the way technology is going, they'll also most likely turn us into a cyborg, because our behaviour rebels, has different opinions and makes overall the process of following one direction difficult. Bottom line, in alignment with the idea, we do need to all follow the same path and same route. We should not have conflict, but we'd find that boring and need to push against boundaries to break new thresholds, but again, we are only going around in circles. It's an endless debate and we will continue as we are until we hit a reset point. In the past, that has been a war or an epidemic that takes us back. We are our own worst enemies and destroying the world we live on daily is the most amazing thing. We do actually work collectively, in destroying ourselves. The complete run down of humanity, I hope you and others realise the quest for harmony is a pipe dream.
@@1i2cVision wtf is this wall of text
@@1337liteproductions The way it is.
This is the best social experiment I've heard of.
Probably found out they were all much more agreeable compared to the online experience.
I want this in the USA!
What an amazing outcome......gives me hope...
If this in the US it would go from arguing to fighting
As people say here there are two topics they try to stay away from:
Politics and Religion
It's the same everywhere. You're not special
ooltimu don’t bother. They all think they’re special.
@Francesco Salvatore Yeah, right. With all that over the top politically correctness and all the invented rights you are right on the money with "fascism"
I absolutely like this idea. I would love to participate some day, it sounds interesting and fun.
My Country Talks should become an annual celebration of the freedom of speech and democracy on which we can all participate in a one-on-one conversation with someone we happen to disagree with.
Can this PLEASE happen in the USA???
It can't happen cause the "liberals" have gone full Stalin
Can I say politics affect people in mostly negative ways. People in power can't escape the temptation of corruption, people being governed become divided even when they, without politics, would have been great friends.
That's bold. I would agree that we have to combat corruption with the assumption that everyone can be corrupt if the offer is good enough.
So, what about a new project: "America Talks?" Not necessarily just the USA: It would be good to include North, South and Central Americans. Who's in favour of this idea?
I am!
Greeks do that all the time, everywhere, with strangers or not. This is why they stay so many hours for a coffee or diner. Is this good? Is this bad? We enjoy it though...
Do you also discuss paying taxes?
@@EquiliMario hehehe how to avoid paying them, like German multinationals do
I want to see this done in the US and I hope it would lead to the same results
Wow this is beautiful. Trying to understand one another is key.
The problem is the *HUGE* numbers of people who aren't open to discussing things they disagree with, who would rather just throw milkshakes than engage and risk having their mind changed.
Don't worry too much about the "huge numbers" for now. You only need a relatively small critical tipping point percentage within homogenous groups to bring about catalytic change.
love the video...love the context...show, maybe there is more to human nature, ...
I remember seeing that logo on campus, now I understand
wonderful observation
Is this expanding to South America? It would be so interesting to see it happening down here... (kinda scary also but we can only hope for the best)
Great work! Kudos!
I was just thinking the other day about the them and the us mentality between democrats and republicans in the usa. I was thinking how we as a society have to stop the them and us and start just listening. Love this. I hope there will be a World version. I would participate.
This is awesome... here comes the but... buuuut the participants are people who were willing to "argue" and have a conversation as well as an open mind. Being an American I see people all the time who talk about their opinions but don't listen to the opinions of others, they simply wait for their turn to talk. I'm curious how this would go with people who are "radical" and steadfast in their beliefs.
The same experience in Brasil would only end up in a fight and someone getting shot
Plot twist: They disagreed with each other
i would do this with anyone. i am a passive person .
@@briankim2555 Yes, it is
This gives me an idea to try this in my university
respect
Awesome !!
Love from Zimbabwe
Love from the Netherlands back to you!
They argue
They didn't
Fabulous
Try doing this in America. It would crash and burn, just like the state of democracy and the environment
I don't think it would, people are nicer that you would think. I think that people see the extremes on social media and think it would be like that in real life. I don't think so. Like he said, it's different when you're face to face, no audience.
Great video! Reminds me of a Monty Python scene....
Iran, Saudi Arabia and the US don't meet. Threats and threats and threats. Everyone in your study was open to meet.
What has gone wrong with society, to make these kind of interactions 'a novelty '??
People talking, discussing issues used to be normal...
instead of whining, screaming, making death threats or 'disengaging' from conversations and walking off offended and sueing the other person, - just because someone disagrees with your opinion...
Ceossing national borders just to have atalk about politics was definitely never normal lol
This was never normal. Your nostalgia is off the charts.
@Schönling G Wunderbar
To talk and discuss/debate issues, rather than scream at each other used to be normal! You are either very young or you were already then deprived of a normal/reasonable/intelligent upbringing.
@@bblrip3690 Dream on. The past wasn't a polite and peaceful wonderland. Just look up some statistics on violence with political motivation.
@@schonlingg.wunderbar2985
I don't have to 'look up statistics', ha ha, I was thete (in 'the past') and it was a LOT more polite, reasoned and considerate. People ACTUALLY listened to each other MORE, considered each other's argument and replied with a counter-argument, instead of attacking each other (verbally or otherwise), if there was a clash of opinions.
Nice!
*Answer*: they fought
Haha, I'm not surprised sweden didn't join in.
Lmao, I barely can talk to someone about politics because nobody around is interested in it
Or can even understand what's going on outside their hobbies, kids & work.
Allegra ❤❤❤❤❤❤
Awesome experiment. I hope it also helped liberal/progressive minds understand conservatives to some degree.
I know without watching! They killed each other! Lol
Did you watch it yet?
Take 15 mins to watch this and see. It's one of the best TED talks 'I've seen in a while.
❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️
it is happening in hong kong here, people would beat up each other severely. Luckily we dont have guns, otherwise it would be a legit civil war.
neat
Hello
Interesting project, although I am somewhat concerned about the gratuitous travel generated by some of your 'nowhere near each other' pairings.
So much for lefties "saving the planet" by combatting "climate change".
No, they just want OTHER people to do the work. They think they are more equal than others.
oh he is so easy to understand, oh er ist auch deutsch
Pfff, I do that online everyday
This would never happen in America. I fear the exact opposite would happen!
ممكن تترجموا الفيديو
Everybody speaks english
بس ف ناس بتتكلم عربي😅
;( 🤨
Ben xgDèmmk.
No they didnt argue but this guy has bodies buried in his basement...
Funny that Steven crowder does the same thing and gets blacklisted and demonetized by UA-cam. Try searching for Steven crowders change my mind series...good luck finding it.
EliasDanger easy to find. All his videos are available.
Crowder isn't trying to have an actual discussion
@@cheeselovingtree and people like the commenter above think UA-cam are somehow stopping his content, which is widely available. Laughable.
Matt Greek ESASC widely available. Go to the search bar, type in Steven crowder change my mind, and you’ll see blaze tv segments a bunch of other channels and way down at the bottom Steven crowders channel. I am literally seeing this happen right now, so don’t say I’m lying.
@@forsaken841 you are lying. I'm on his channel right now, where all his videos are, right the way up to the one where he left youtube. You're either lying or you don't know how to type his name into a UA-cam search bar. Embarrassing.
0 views but 3 likes? UA-cam’s drunk again
It has to calculate the views first. The number rise faster than the CPU can ceep up. So it is saved and calculated later, usually after 5 minutes
First!!
Nice!
The room would smell like fart with all the BS talk
you're the smartest person on the internet and nobody knows more about politics than you
make a China talk, haha
This comment section is full of THE EXACT KIND of imbecilic, liberal, stupidity, balderdash, and douchebaggery that I would expect, given it's title. What a pack of disgusting, abysmally ignorant, scum bags and fools there are, who have the audacity to voice their DANGEROUSLY STUPID opinions!! You'd THINK that the fools who know NOTHING about the REAL World, would have just, barely, a modicum of SENSE, enough to understand that they know NOTHING, but NOPE!! They're actually THAT stupid!
"What happened when we paired up thousands of idiots to talk politics."
You don't have to be a genius to know the answer.
you're the smartest person on the internet and nobody knows more about politics than you.
12th
You're catching up Germany, you've discovered the supreme importance that true freedom of speech has in a society and what it can accomplish.
3rd view. Nice.
Hi