ScienceCasts: Strange Flames on the International Space Station

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 9 лют 2025
  • Visit science.nasa.gov/ for breaking science news.
    Researchers experimenting with flames onboard the International Space Station have produced a strange, cool-burning form of fire that could help improve the efficiency of auto engines.

КОМЕНТАРІ • 154

  • @looper3412
    @looper3412 11 років тому +117

    I wonder what a flamethrower would look like in zero g...

  • @EmilioKolomenski
    @EmilioKolomenski 9 років тому +165

    Please say the temperature in degrees Celcius too. Using only Farenheit in a science video is just wrong.

  • @damienscullytoo
    @damienscullytoo 11 років тому +1

    Metric system was designed for science,it is as simple as numbers that it.0 Celsius is when water turns to ice and 100C is the boilng point.

  • @manyhotchilles
    @manyhotchilles 11 років тому +1

    scientists use this thing called the SI Unit. its like a universal unit for scientists around the world . in this case is celsius.

  • @Chearn22
    @Chearn22 11 років тому +8

    This is great. NASA, thank you so much for the interesting, relevant, and succinct videos. Keep up the great work!

  • @kingofcobwebs
    @kingofcobwebs 11 років тому +3

    Cool Flames are what cause combustion engines to knock, but the chemical reaction is a bit different in 1G and it does not last very long. It seems that in microgravity, the gravitational mass of the fuel causes the flame to condense, keeping the reaction contained in a cool sphere with greater longevity - at 400 C° instead of 1100 °C. It would be difficult to reconstruct those conditions on Earth, but it's food for thought nonetheless.

  • @WeRWun
    @WeRWun 11 років тому +34

    "Flames are hard to understand...because they are complicated!!!"
    WELL SAID!!! ROFL... ^_^

  • @AggravatedAstronomer
    @AggravatedAstronomer 11 років тому +1

    There should not be 'bias' or 'favours owed' in science outreach. Just because a science organisation is funded by a group of people who use 'elephant's trunks' as a unit of distance, does not mean it should change the way science is done and taught.
    One of the best things about science is that it does not belong to any one nation or people. It will always be better to use SI units in an educational science video.

  • @sun99time
    @sun99time 11 років тому

    Kelvin is referenced more often for very cold temps as zero degrees K (or absolute zero) is -273 C. (no minus temps in Kelvin). Therefore, zero degrees C is 273 K and 100 C is 373 K.

  • @IstasPumaNevada
    @IstasPumaNevada 11 років тому +14

    This is one of the most interesting sciencecasts I can remember watching. Very cool.
    Also, as a U.S. citizen, I would appreciate at least a text notation of metric units alongside verbalized non-metric units, if not the other way around.

  • @OverlordZephyros
    @OverlordZephyros 11 років тому +6

    I love that something as simple as a flame brings SO MUCH MYSTERY that we humans haven't found out, that will bring LOTS of new technologies and Knowledge.
    ...
    love science :)

  • @CampCougarCA
    @CampCougarCA 11 років тому +1

    Formaldehyde exhaust doesn't seem to be an improvement over current exhaust products.

  • @onelowerlight
    @onelowerlight 11 років тому

    But the station itself is in free fall, which means that the force of gravity does not have a noticeable effect relative to the station's frame of reference.

  • @CharlieBennici
    @CharlieBennici 11 років тому +4

    In space, they experience zero g. Not zero gravity. There is some but not much. They are traveling at about the same speed as their surrounding. Not zero gravity

  • @srfnscubamunkey
    @srfnscubamunkey 11 років тому +1

    because the people who made the video have the exclusive right to use whatever system they want.

  • @Weiszcracker
    @Weiszcracker 11 років тому

    This explains everything.....

  • @tomlent672
    @tomlent672 9 років тому +4

    I"m not following how changing to a combustion engine whose exhaust is primarily CO and HCHO is a good thing.

  • @Carpathian2010
    @Carpathian2010 11 років тому +1

    so does this mean their model of the sun is flawed?

  • @you2tooyou2too
    @you2tooyou2too 11 років тому

    I believe something like a 'gas wick/inducer' will be needed to allow a continuous, passive 'candle flame' process to work without gravity. More later.

  • @donnygrungerson473
    @donnygrungerson473 11 років тому

    was wondering about that myself

  • @jerry-Shor
    @jerry-Shor 11 років тому +1

    wow... love it. One day i would love to be at least as a visitor on any nasa place.....
    thank for the information.

  • @nycoshouse
    @nycoshouse 11 років тому

    Tc = (5/9)*(Tf-32)
    Tf = (9/5)*Tc+32
    Tc = temperature in degrees Celsius, Tf = temperature in degrees Fahrenheit

  • @Raynor9X9
    @Raynor9X9 11 років тому

    I guess it was meant to be understood by the general public. Most Americans don't know Celsius.

  • @Fantastic3522
    @Fantastic3522 11 років тому +2

    Thank you Nasa, for share something make me very surprise, i love inteligent people.

  • @PowerDriverLT4
    @PowerDriverLT4 11 років тому +1

    I love that they do this stuff and report it. But like all things people see, I keep expecting them to say, well, even though it looks like that, and our people see it, it is just a camera issue, or some light and lenses distortions. (regardless if they confiscate the film when you land). I really do love what is reported, I just wish all the information was. I find it all interesting.

  • @hotlersamosir6286
    @hotlersamosir6286 11 років тому

    Very cool, like it so much. Always believe there are so much to learn & secrets to reveal.

  • @q7winq7
    @q7winq7 11 років тому

    Thank you NASA for posting these videos - this one was particularly interesting.
    What is less interesting are the comments made by persons commenting on someone else's comment.

  • @leocurious9919
    @leocurious9919 10 років тому +18

    °F seriously?

  • @BARUNIZ
    @BARUNIZ 11 років тому

    Awesome video.

  • @Genet1xProductions
    @Genet1xProductions 11 років тому

    Very cool

  • @OverlordZephyros
    @OverlordZephyros 11 років тому +2

    I understand what you mean, I prefer Celsius myself.

  • @humzazaidi2443
    @humzazaidi2443 11 років тому

    What is formaldehyde?

  • @seapeddler
    @seapeddler 11 років тому

    If the earth was spinning 500 mph at the equator and orbiting the sun at 50 000 mph, would there be less pollution? It appears velocity of orbit is critical to atmosphere retention, and combustion cycles.

  • @lachlan1971
    @lachlan1971 11 років тому

    I don't have a model of the sun. I'd never sleep with it shining away in the corner.

  • @Naeuuin
    @Naeuuin 11 років тому

    is this one better? NASA IS located in USA

  • @SpiritLadyArtist
    @SpiritLadyArtist 11 років тому

    Because we in the USA can't convert too well as we don't use it. I know we should and I try to get the concept as I live on the Canadian border so I hear it at times.

  • @dsvc4591
    @dsvc4591 11 років тому

    cool flame

  • @शिवप्रमति
    @शिवप्रमति 9 років тому +7

    This is a good video, says Neotheone

  • @lejink
    @lejink 11 років тому

    What if the government hurries your bricks into the market only to find out later they fall apart after a year? Or that they can't cope with water?
    Building codes related to the structure of a house are strict for that reason.. So the process is hard and expensive, if this product is as good or better than the current product in use the profit will be worth the effort

  • @TheMotorick
    @TheMotorick 11 років тому

    Because it's aimed at non-scientists in America where Fahrenheit is the convention.

  • @KmaxxCanada
    @KmaxxCanada 10 років тому

    Sales prospects need to remember that we do have a thing called physics and chemistry that rule this planet since its inception.

  • @SuperDvco
    @SuperDvco 10 років тому +1

    freaking awesome

  • @you2tooyou2too
    @you2tooyou2too 11 років тому

    There are practical reasons/advantages to using F v C or K, and of course more reasons for not converting. Since the US has so many more non-technical people than technical, and than Europe, it will require much more time (if ever) for the still imperfect 'metric' system to become commonplace here.

  • @Naeuuin
    @Naeuuin 11 років тому

    because most people know the references with Fahrenheit

  • @thekorgboy98
    @thekorgboy98 11 років тому

    They use it not to confuse people.

  • @hopebear06
    @hopebear06 11 років тому

    I work with a brilliant engineer who is currently fighting the Australian government to allow non baked brick products into our housing regulations. Our pressed bricks use 5 kj per ton compared with 5000 kj per ton for a conventional kiln fired brick. Our bricks are as durable and have better insulative characteristics than the fired product. Why do we have to "fight" to allow a superior product into the market? Our kids have a right to this planet but corporations are not interested in helping.

  • @yasmeenajaj7717
    @yasmeenajaj7717 10 років тому +4

    Hey, UC San Diego! Home sweet home!

  • @ElimRem
    @ElimRem 11 років тому

    Sick burn!

  • @davinaperez9985
    @davinaperez9985 11 років тому

    Awesome....

  • @Raynor9X9
    @Raynor9X9 11 років тому

    The average American would rarely even see a Celsius measurement outside of a science classroom (which Americans are failing at anyways), and if they did they would look for the Fahrenheit measurement in order to understand it.

  • @chimkinNuggz
    @chimkinNuggz 11 років тому

    If you light a flame in a space station wouldnt the flame elongate instead towards the small tug of gravity wich is the earth? Thats what i dont get

  • @MattHumanPizza
    @MattHumanPizza 11 років тому

    I'll stick up for you on this post since what you say makes sense and the response has a lot of thumbs up

  • @siriuscosmos
    @siriuscosmos 11 років тому +1

    I agree! I LOVE this channel! :))

  • @gautamganguly8931
    @gautamganguly8931 9 років тому

    Amazing really

  • @fabianchickyescalada2632
    @fabianchickyescalada2632 11 років тому

    Existe la posibilidad de que traduzcan al español los videos? Gracias

    • @mauroelias9406
      @mauroelias9406 10 років тому

      Podes leer en castellano las noticias en: ciencia.nasa.gov/

  • @19596940
    @19596940 11 років тому

    that shows man should die for knowledge on basics such as water air and fire. great indeed is the person behind this mission.

  • @Khether0001
    @Khether0001 11 років тому

    wow...

  • @DanYHKim2
    @DanYHKim2 11 років тому +1

    'cause it's NASA. We're Americans!

  • @roamboticsjr.7544
    @roamboticsjr.7544 9 років тому +10

    Nice but «Poly-cyclic» not «poly-cylic» :-/

  • @fnb16
    @fnb16 11 років тому

    The force of Earth's gravity does indeed act strongly on the space station. However, the space station is orbiting the Earth, which means that it is always in free-fall. Free-fall is what most people mean when they think "zero gravity". This vid does a better job of explaining: watch?v=-wIi4if5GUQ

  • @Dawthchling
    @Dawthchling 11 років тому +2

    Why use Fahrenheit in a science video o.O?

  • @Korohpu
    @Korohpu 11 років тому

    So research in space might lead to a technology to decrease CO2 emissionsdown here on Earth?
    Awesome!

  • @dpill36
    @dpill36 11 років тому

    Get your on Government to do research and don't worry about what we use

  • @jerinantony007
    @jerinantony007 11 років тому

    sounds cool.. atleast

  • @ulapi
    @ulapi 11 років тому

    awsom

  • @motherjoon
    @motherjoon 11 років тому

    Ma man! Celsius not Fahrenheit

  • @mikgus
    @mikgus 11 років тому

    don't they use kelvin?

  • @Jvk1166z
    @Jvk1166z 11 років тому +1

    I wonder why NASA has less views and subs than SSoHPKC who plays video games :P

  • @BosonCollider
    @BosonCollider 11 років тому

    That's less helpful than you'd think. It's useful for discussing the weather, but less so for calculating the efficiency of an engine or talking about the chemistry of a flame.
    Most scientists and engineers will use Kelvin degrees for most technical applications. Physicists will occasionally go even further and use natural units with the Boltzmann constant set to zero.
    The SI system is rather outdated tbh. It's complete crap for anything related to electromagnetism.

  • @ThyGeekGoddessMuze
    @ThyGeekGoddessMuze 11 років тому +2

    It's good to know they're still working on it since Skylab. They really need to make saving the world profitable or something. It's insane we have to think of it that way. The oil companies have always known they'd have to do something else for a living, but who knew they would do so much evil? (besides everybody with an active braincell) They need to go ahead and flip the switch already! I'm sure they'll do well in 3D printer materials.

  • @YuriHabadakas
    @YuriHabadakas 11 років тому

    They're pretty close on nuclear fusion.

  • @DepressedLemur9
    @DepressedLemur9 11 років тому

    Who can blame them, that's the easiest thing to do.

  • @nycoshouse
    @nycoshouse 11 років тому +1

    Pretty cold ;)

  • @robertbutwell
    @robertbutwell 11 років тому

    Because they wanted to communicate the idea to people like me.
    The use is totally appropriate for this venue.
    True scientists go elsewhere to get their C / K and flame chemistry data in detail.
    The important issue is a flame in microgravity. Don't lose sight of that.

  • @sstrama
    @sstrama 11 років тому +1

    I will like to have my birthday celebrated in that NASA space station. Candle burns in cool chemistry. Dr. Shyam

  • @didadiasura
    @didadiasura 11 років тому

    沒中文說明~

  • @pineapplepenumbra
    @pineapplepenumbra 11 років тому +1

    aren't going to help international relations, are they?

  • @DarkSmith91
    @DarkSmith91 11 років тому

    Very interesting! But please use Celcius

  • @erikfassett
    @erikfassett 11 років тому

    I use Fahrenheit for measuring temperatures , but I use Celsius for water freezing points and boiling points, but mainly I use Fahrenheit. So it doesn't matter what they use

  • @holonat
    @holonat 9 років тому

    Very cool :)

  • @DrWoodyII
    @DrWoodyII 11 років тому

    Science at NASA. Gotta love it.

  • @sirsycophantic
    @sirsycophantic 11 років тому

    You spelled homogeneous wrong.

  • @Mamotretonio
    @Mamotretonio 11 років тому

    Do you know why all matter same as energy forms spheres in space microgravity ?, well that's due to the Higgs Boson Particle Field.
    Elementary my dear Watson.

  • @Triple88a
    @Triple88a 11 років тому

    Because... Murica.

  • @SageFive
    @SageFive 11 років тому

    Lol you would think they would know better than that

  • @mailarrives
    @mailarrives 11 років тому

    because the rest of the world has copyright on Celsius or Kelvin ... lol

  • @sdam87
    @sdam87 11 років тому

    but you are right i shouldn't include Canada xD

  • @sdam87
    @sdam87 11 років тому

    And now the topic is who can work for nasa ?? i thought we were talking about the units used for this video. (besides i meant different ethnic groups) whoever can get a green card or a citizenship if he or she is smart enough to be needed by NASA

  • @AssemblerGuy
    @AssemblerGuy 11 років тому

    Isn't this "cool" type of fire a safety hazard? I mean; something on a manned spacecraft accidently catches fire. The crew uses the extiguishers, till there is seemingly no more fire. But then "cool" burning sets in, continuing to burn unseen, all the while giving off poisonous carbonmonoxide...!

  • @gotohellfast
    @gotohellfast 11 років тому

    14 Black Astronauts went to space since 1983. Just google it.

  • @ABitOfTheUniverse
    @ABitOfTheUniverse 11 років тому

    I was singing the chorus to the flame song in my head while watching this.
    Pyrolysis, chemiluminescence, oxidation, incandescence.
    vimeo. com/40271657
    or search for "What is a Flame" by Ben Ames

  • @hopebear06
    @hopebear06 11 років тому

    have been tested for over 20 years and meet all standards.

  • @you2tooyou2too
    @you2tooyou2too 11 років тому

    It will always be harder to persuade them if you don't understand them. Despite the Supreme Court, Corporations are not human, nor moral. Agents of a business have a legal and (oddly) even a moral duty to maximize profits for the corporate stakeholders. To the extent this conflicts with the agent's human morals or duty to society, he is morally compromised. Where an obligate choice to do the 'right' vs the 'profitable' thing, both must have some commonality, for the business to serve 'us'.

  • @robertoolivo8541
    @robertoolivo8541 11 років тому

    me gusta la Nasa porque me gusta estar actualizado

  • @Adardardar1
    @Adardardar1 11 років тому

    'Merica. Nuff said.

  • @THE16THPHANTOM
    @THE16THPHANTOM 11 років тому

    the video is intended for Americans, and they don't let go of their traditions easily.

  • @KasimirRadtke
    @KasimirRadtke 11 років тому

    I wanna go into space! :D

  • @floatsomjetsom
    @floatsomjetsom 11 років тому

    this means all we think about f Space and energy far beyond the Small ways we have been thought the Universe uses all as it sees fit the wonderful willingness of Creation ~. ~'

  • @jim8991
    @jim8991 11 років тому +1

    Why is their always someone that makes a stupid coment?

  • @MichaelS-vy1ku
    @MichaelS-vy1ku 11 років тому

    oops, replied to the wrong person, think I got my message across either way