Diana received a massive set of Sapphires and Diamonds from the Saudi Royal family as a wedding gift. Those pieces were made into a necklace, earrings, bracelet, and watch. The sapphire broach from the Queen Mother is a separate piece.
The Teck Hoop Tiara /Necklace...IF Its part of the Royal Collection which I believe it is... Then it doesn't now belong to Princess Margaret's son and def NOT his ( now) divorced Wife, Serena. It will have been handed back to The Royal Collection when Princess Margaret Died!!
@@mpalmer5754: The British government does not own these jewels. They are the private property of various members of the British ruling family. The jewels that are owned by the British government are the Crown Jewels and cannot be sold. Besides, the sale of even the most valuable of these gemstones would not make a bit of difference in relieving the suffering of the homeless in Britain. For that, you need big money: taxes. So good luck on persuading the majority of the British electorate to vote in favor of a tax to end homeless.
Kate might not have it either. It could be being kept until Charlotte is old enough to inherit it. And your comment about Meghan was not necessary. Catherine has pieces that come from Diana that she wears often.
@@MissMoth9253 I don’t believe she did either. She is married to the the second son aka the spare. And they don’t seem to be like Queen Mary who gave each daughter in law a show stopper tiara for their particular branch of the family. Besides if we are being honest, I wish Princess Anne, the Princess Royal had inherited more of the jewelry from her mother. But alas it did not happen.
@@meganmeherbanigilbert9762 She took the jewelry that was set aside for Prince Harry wife. Nothing more. They really do treat women badly in that family
Impossible for Queen Victoria to have given a necklace to her daughter-in-law in 1842 for obvious reasons. Victoria’s eldest son was born in November 1841. Even though royal marriages were frequently contracted early, there was none to a Princess Alexandrine of Baden ever. A Princess Alexandrine of Baden did marry Prince Albert’s brother in 1842, so perhaps the necklace was a present to her instead.
Clearly there is no idea of the beautiful Royal pieces of Indian royalty. Will blow your mind. Much superior to the ones shown in sheer visual delight.
You know, everyone has their own likes and dislikes and I know some of those pieces were designed many, many years ago. Some of it is attractive but some of it appears gaudy.
Elles sont splendides les pierres précieuses indiennes qui se retrouvent comme par hasard en Angleterre ses pierres sont un bien des indous prises du temps de la colonisation il faut rendrent ses pierres à l Indes cela leurs revient de pleins droits tout les pays coloniser ont était dépouiller de leurs richesses et après ils font les beaux avec ce qu'ils ne leurs appartient pas vive l Inde et j'espère qu elle va récupérer ce qui lui revient de droits 🇮🇳🇮🇳🇮🇳🇮🇳🇮🇳🇮🇳🇮🇳🇮🇳🇮🇳🇮🇳🇮🇳🇮🇳🇮🇳🇮🇳🇮🇳🇮🇳✌️✌️✌️✌️✌️✌️✌️✌️✌️✌️✌️✌️✌️✌️✌️✌️💪💪💪💪💪💪💪💪💪💪💪💪💪💪💪
Yeah ok, I NEED to see Catherine in Diana's pearl and sapphire necklace!
They are all beautiful pieces, but the "Garnett" necklace is absolutely gorgeous.☀️
Just magical.💛 Thank you for sharing.♥️
Diana received a massive set of Sapphires and Diamonds from the Saudi Royal family as a wedding gift. Those pieces were made into a necklace, earrings, bracelet, and watch. The sapphire broach from the Queen Mother is a separate piece.
Not Queen Mary of Texas, it’s Teck
A classic of AI narration!!
Love the idea of Mary of Texas .
Right
The Teck Hoop Tiara /Necklace...IF Its part of the Royal Collection which I believe it is... Then it doesn't now belong to Princess Margaret's son and def NOT his ( now) divorced Wife, Serena. It will have been handed back to The Royal Collection when Princess Margaret Died!!
There are always mistakes in these videos. The one you highlighted is often repeated
All of that is the property of india .
The Historic sapphire brooch was a Gift from The Queen Mother...Diana wore it a couple of times then changed it to a chocker necklace.
Just a thought… England isn’t that large. Why wouldn’t just one of these sets be sold and then the $ could go to housing and food banks. ??
@@mpalmer5754: The British government does not own these jewels. They are the private property of various members of the British ruling family. The jewels that are owned by the British government are the Crown Jewels and cannot be sold.
Besides, the sale of even the most valuable of these gemstones would not make a bit of difference in relieving the suffering of the homeless in Britain. For that, you need big money: taxes. So good luck on persuading the majority of the British electorate to vote in favor of a tax to end homeless.
That necklace was not sold. Margarets daughter wore that necklace to her cousin King Charles inauguration
NOT the same sorry...Sarah Chattos was her own..
The half of jewelries are stolen from different countries dark side of British history 😂😂😂. Thieves
Kate obviously has Dianas Sapphire and pearl neclace because Meg 100% would be showing it off if she has inherited it.
Kate might not have it either. It could be being kept until Charlotte is old enough to inherit it. And your comment about Meghan was not necessary. Catherine has pieces that come from Diana that she wears often.
I don’t think Meaghan really got much from Diana’s collection or Elizabeth’s. I do believe princess charlotte will inherit a good portion of both sets
@@MissMoth9253 I don’t believe she did either. She is married to the the second son aka the spare. And they don’t seem to be like Queen Mary who gave each daughter in law a show stopper tiara for their particular branch of the family. Besides if we are being honest, I wish Princess Anne, the Princess Royal had inherited more of the jewelry from her mother. But alas it did not happen.
I don’t believe Meghan was allowed to take any jewellery with her.
@@meganmeherbanigilbert9762 She took the jewelry that was set aside for Prince Harry wife. Nothing more. They really do treat women badly in that family
A large Sapphire,yes I would say, its enormous!
Queen Mary of TEXAS ???? (3;18) 😐
I believe that’s Queen Mary of Teck. 🙂
no not everything is about the USA
@tomsimpson6863 oh puh-leeze...listen to what the machine says! Of course I know it's Teck. Lighten up.
I heard “Texas,” too. How stupid can one be?…
Pretty damn stupid! LOL!!!
Yes, Mary of Teck
Impossible for Queen Victoria to have given a necklace to her daughter-in-law in 1842 for obvious reasons. Victoria’s eldest son was born in November 1841. Even though royal marriages were frequently contracted early, there was none to a Princess Alexandrine of Baden ever. A Princess Alexandrine of Baden did marry Prince Albert’s brother in 1842, so perhaps the necklace was a present to her instead.
That Garnet piece is hideous and I don't care how much it costs. The tiara necklace.. now THATS a masterpiece.
Beautiful beautiful and beautiful ❤
Mary of Teck.
"Queen Mary of Texas"????? It's TECK
The narrator’s voice puts me to sleep.
Who is Queen Mary from Texas????? For God sake get the information right
She’s the queen married to king George of Arizona. Lolololol
Clearly there is no idea of the beautiful Royal pieces of Indian royalty. Will blow your mind. Much superior to the ones shown in sheer visual delight.
Naples is in Italy not France
The sapphire necklace, etc, looks more like Kashmir sapphires rather than Ceylon sapphires
Royal jewels go back to the crown.
Wow❤
The sun king gifts
You know, everyone has their own likes and dislikes and I know some of those pieces were designed many, many years ago. Some of it is attractive but some of it appears gaudy.
Where the heck is the information about the necklace that was first shown???? What a rip off!!!!
Ith was stolen by indian you by brocht you will somday terun the stolen diamant😮😮😮😮
That's somebody's blood🩸
Not of "Texas"....
Who did they play out of that?😂
Such expensive stuff
🎉ရတနာများလှပတောက်နေသည်
Queen Mary of Texas? BS! Bad translation. Done!
Это мне все Виктория подарила
Elles sont splendides les pierres précieuses indiennes qui se retrouvent comme par hasard en Angleterre ses pierres sont un bien des indous prises du temps de la colonisation il faut rendrent ses pierres à l Indes cela leurs revient de pleins droits tout les pays coloniser ont était dépouiller de leurs richesses et après ils font les beaux avec ce qu'ils ne leurs appartient pas vive l Inde et j'espère qu elle va récupérer ce qui lui revient de droits 🇮🇳🇮🇳🇮🇳🇮🇳🇮🇳🇮🇳🇮🇳🇮🇳🇮🇳🇮🇳🇮🇳🇮🇳🇮🇳🇮🇳🇮🇳🇮🇳✌️✌️✌️✌️✌️✌️✌️✌️✌️✌️✌️✌️✌️✌️✌️✌️💪💪💪💪💪💪💪💪💪💪💪💪💪💪💪
Этот пух дороже чем эти бриллианты
Hi❤❤❤❤
❤❤❤❤❤❤🎉🎉🎉🎉
Stolen wealth from INDIA.. during british rule in INDIA... Give it back...
😂 British rule on Asia at that time their isn't any India . And jewellery belongs Muslim ruler so it's originally belongs to Muslim
Oh well
Oh no
@@rahatsultani5133Muslims invaded and stole from the wealth produces aka Hindus
Not stolen -given.India belonged to UK
Some of those necklaces are positively vulgar!
Fake me God66
Give back all the riches stolen from Africa!
Sve to treba vratiti njihovim kolo ijama
Кто есть что глаза пучите на маи бриллианты ❤яяяяя Велллл Фемели Виктория гаварю пошли вон некому
♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥