How Do Airports Keep Birds From Striking Planes? A Wildlife Expert Explains | WSJ Booked

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 2 сер 2024

КОМЕНТАРІ • 72

  • @michelbruns
    @michelbruns 2 роки тому +82

    i could have told you without 20 years of experience that birds are the animals that strike plains the most, and not dogs, sharks or even elephants

    • @BroAnarchy
      @BroAnarchy 2 роки тому +10

      Man, i was going to say... Sharks would be way up there for me.
      Especially those Sharknados.

    • @KGisthename
      @KGisthename 2 роки тому +1

      ​@@BroAnarchy Naive sharks?

    • @connorawalsh
      @connorawalsh 2 роки тому +1

      I mean she did a thorough explanation from start to finish. I learned a lot!

    • @danh6720
      @danh6720 2 роки тому +1

      It’s a somewhat silly statistic if it’s not presented along with the fact that numbers of strikes are important but have to be weighed against consequences. For example, deer are rarely struck, but it’s a much bigger problem when they are. Basically a small part of the instruction that doesn’t make sense without the rest.

  • @BroAnarchy
    @BroAnarchy 2 роки тому +29

    Man getting _paid_ to *_drive around_* honking at birds to leave an airport sounds like my dream job! 🤩🤩🤩

  • @leo_nidas
    @leo_nidas 2 роки тому +12

    These are great details! Thanks for the report. Very informative.

  • @megha6691
    @megha6691 2 роки тому +5

    Wsj .. thy always come up something more informative. Totally love watching these videos.

  • @heidichu9863
    @heidichu9863 2 роки тому +4

    Wow such a cool topic - I knew nothing about this! Amazing work :)

  • @sly273
    @sly273 2 роки тому +2

    what a informative video, good job wsj.

  • @Alorio-Gori
    @Alorio-Gori Рік тому

    Thank you for all these Hard Work 💪

  • @scotterickson3730
    @scotterickson3730 2 роки тому +12

    But birds aren’t real

  • @ReynaSingh
    @ReynaSingh 2 роки тому +7

    4:03 poor possum

  • @regolith1350
    @regolith1350 2 роки тому +33

    “Birds are the wildlife group most frequently struck by aircraft”
    Well obviously. Birds fly. Planes fly. They’re gonna collide. There isn’t gonna be an epidemic of planes hitting deer or dolphins, is there? Who writes this stuff? This is like saying “food is most commonly eaten during meals”.

    • @delia_watercolors
      @delia_watercolors 2 роки тому +1

      If you start thinking like this, you will notice it in every piece of newsmedia and otherwise, available on television, Internet and radio. It is unavoidable.

    • @BroAnarchy
      @BroAnarchy 2 роки тому

      Lol 🤷‍♂️

    • @danh6720
      @danh6720 2 роки тому +1

      There is an epidemic of planes hitting deer in some locations. It’s not as frequent, but hitting deer is a bigger problem per collision.

  • @kevinjenner9502
    @kevinjenner9502 2 роки тому +2

    In Japan they fire blank cartridges, set off fireworks and a whole host of similar actions.

  • @alparslankorkmaz2964
    @alparslankorkmaz2964 2 роки тому +1

    Nice video.

  • @manifold1476
    @manifold1476 2 роки тому +3

    Q: How Do Airports Keep Birds From Striking Planes?
    A: They Don't.

  • @RobsonFilho
    @RobsonFilho 2 роки тому +3

    How to mitigate it, *clock kok*

  • @oldmandoinghighkicksonlyin1368
    @oldmandoinghighkicksonlyin1368 2 роки тому +4

    Really? Birds are the animals most likely to strike an airplane?
    I would've thought dolphins.
    Duh.

  • @TobiasDuncan
    @TobiasDuncan 2 роки тому +4

    "Aircrafts"

  • @jamescallaway7376
    @jamescallaway7376 7 місяців тому

    Very rarely do birds strike aircraft, they don't intentionally fly into aircraft!
    Its the aircraft that tends to strike the birds as they can't out pace or out manoeuvre aircraft due to the speed.
    Some species such as birds of prey have been known however to attack slow flying light aircraft, microlights hang gliders when they enter their territory to defend it.

  • @stebolavirus
    @stebolavirus 2 роки тому +2

    Engine ingestion...haha...aka bird stew...aka Snarge?!

  • @oquendo0021
    @oquendo0021 2 роки тому +1

    Omg like that one video where the plane is landing and it runs over a deer and gets stuck on the tire

  • @auro1986
    @auro1986 2 роки тому +2

    how?cutting trees to make airports and runways and birds don't have place to nest

  • @fredricknolan3905
    @fredricknolan3905 2 роки тому +1

    Remember Shellyburg at JFK.

  • @MeowfaceMusic
    @MeowfaceMusic 9 місяців тому

    How about amplifying particular frequencies to deter birds from hanging around?

  • @krishnasingh2520
    @krishnasingh2520 2 роки тому +4

    "Sully" fans put your attendance here
    ✈️✈️🕊️🕊️

  • @tonysteve5855
    @tonysteve5855 2 роки тому +2

    i have a question

  • @tonysteve5855
    @tonysteve5855 2 роки тому +2

    waht does mean to have a turbo engine jet aircraft

    • @bbt305
      @bbt305 2 роки тому

      They just mean a jet engine versus a propeller.

  • @Aeronaut1975
    @Aeronaut1975 2 роки тому +1

    There's no such word as "aircrafts", it's a singular plural like rice or pasta. You can have one or a hundred aircraft, but not a hundred aircrafts.

  • @karlriina6950
    @karlriina6950 2 роки тому +3

    more proof. #birdsarentreal

  • @danielm8950
    @danielm8950 2 роки тому

    I beeped at a bird once too. It was in the road.

  • @grahamkingston1679
    @grahamkingston1679 2 роки тому

    It’s crazy how many birds get killed by airplanes

  • @aarononeal9830
    @aarononeal9830 2 роки тому

    The Wallstreet journal needs to talk about Ecosia they are a search engine that plants tress.

  • @kristofferthordarson1040
    @kristofferthordarson1040 2 роки тому +2

    So you’re telling me that Spirit has a lot of wildlife strikes?

  • @pedrolplgm
    @pedrolplgm 2 роки тому +1

    IN SPAIN.
    ONLY REPORTS.
    ROBER SR.
    GOOD.
    THANKS.
    THE END.

  • @Royalfaction
    @Royalfaction 2 роки тому

    Those birds are innocent and just trying to find thier way lol. While playing by the rules of course

  • @daveselbow9128
    @daveselbow9128 2 роки тому

    sending 'snarge' samples to a lab for identification?
    what a waste of money...

    • @danh6720
      @danh6720 2 роки тому

      Except identifying the bird type helps direct prevention measures and reduces the chance a given aircraft is going to have a costly collision.

  • @Nill757
    @Nill757 2 роки тому

    How bout some foxes

  • @dennisthomas8755
    @dennisthomas8755 2 роки тому +1

    1st view

  • @juliez9673
    @juliez9673 2 роки тому

    Okay yeah the birds are cool, BUT WHAT ABOUT THE REST OF BS W/ THE PORT AUTHORITY AIRPORTS

  • @luisito6314
    @luisito6314 29 днів тому

    Learned nothing here

  • @United_Wings
    @United_Wings 2 роки тому

    they shoot them😯

    • @speedplays6710
      @speedplays6710 2 роки тому

      Skeet shooting practice

    • @danh6720
      @danh6720 2 роки тому

      Sometimes, but it’s not the most effective or best way to prevent strikes.

    • @speedplays6710
      @speedplays6710 2 роки тому

      @@danh6720 dump plastic into the water supply

  • @AGTsakumis
    @AGTsakumis 2 роки тому +7

    These types of stories by WSJ are a welcome departure from the usual govt screw-up etc. One question: After a bird strike, why keep the carcasses? Who cares? Just toss them and move on. Seems there's too much to this process.

    • @TheVermilliaFamily
      @TheVermilliaFamily 2 роки тому +7

      I believe they are kept to be identified, so they can understand which birds are more likely to be hit. It's especially important if they are endangered species.

    • @AGTsakumis
      @AGTsakumis 2 роки тому +2

      @@TheVermilliaFamily Great point. I didn't even consider that. Thank you for that information. Be well.

    • @danh6720
      @danh6720 2 роки тому

      It’s a little odd that they’re keeping that many samples for so long. I do this as part of my job, and if the bird is obviously identifiable, I submit the report and dispose of the remains. If I need to send a sample to the Smithsonian for ID, it’s sent the same or next day. So I don’t quite know why they are storing that many. I suspect it’s a procedure specific to Newark, JFK, and LaGuardia.

  • @teamtryxgg281
    @teamtryxgg281 2 роки тому +5

    The US has the world's most dilapidated airports and China has the world's most futuristic and modern airports:
    The Beijing Daxing international airport, Qingdao international airport, Chengdu international airport .. to name just a few.

    • @Nill757
      @Nill757 2 роки тому

      Get rid of EPA. Presto. New airports, quickly, cheaply. Use state enviro laws

    • @johnl.7754
      @johnl.7754 2 роки тому

      But that means China airport fees are much more expensive then US airport fees even though average income is much lower. I lived there and wondered why it cost more to fly from China.

  • @SolracNexus
    @SolracNexus 2 роки тому +6

    Meanwhile in the middle east: "How do airports keep planes from striking buildings?"

  • @PacoOtis
    @PacoOtis 2 роки тому

    This false observation is so very common. "THEY" are not in our habitat! "WE" are in theirs! This is very similar to our complaining about the wolves in "our" habitat of Yellowstone! This is completely wrong! What a pitiful species we are! Best of luck to all of us!

    • @mrepix8287
      @mrepix8287 2 роки тому

      No, humans are at the top and we have the right to do as we please. There are plenty of natural areas for birds to fly to, airports are very small in the grand scheme of things

  • @teamtryxgg281
    @teamtryxgg281 2 роки тому +3

    If Americans and Europeans watch videos of modern airports and thousands of skyscrapers in China, I'm sure they'll get jealous of China to the point of feeling suicidal.
    I watch tons of drone videos of cities in China every day. A small city in China is bigger and more modern than New York city, America's biggest city.

    • @thaveenrubenthiran2190
      @thaveenrubenthiran2190 2 роки тому +4

      really put in the perspective of how many people are suffering in Shanghai.....thank you for your insight

    • @teamtryxgg281
      @teamtryxgg281 2 роки тому +1

      @@thaveenrubenthiran2190 I agree with you. What's happening in Shanghai is temporary (or transitory as Jerome Powell insisted).

  • @paulrosario8572
    @paulrosario8572 Рік тому

    Sonic Net Flockfree