something is wrong with your avg math at the end... ( 6650 & 6700 being the same and only 5700 being slower ) edit: so 6700XT avg is 88,75 acording to your tests...
The average score at the end is an error. Look at the entire video. The 6700XT clearly shows it's about 20% faster on average than the 6650XT. Not to mention the extra vram will help out with textures and ray tracing.
@@MantasNan it's USD, the key is patient to wait the day some people listing the under priced gpu and you need to be fast also before somebody else get it.
I wonder how you're getting that low FPS on the 5700 XT. I'm still rocking that card at 1440p and I'm getting around the same fps you are but you're at 1080p???
@@RealABGamerBoy The 6700 XT is about 20% faster than the 6650 XT in all tested games here but they have identical averages in the final section. Those average numbers are wrong.
where ? the 6600/6650 XT is way better then the 5700 XT cause of power draw, ray tracing support, driver support, game optimisation. Only downside is the 128 bit bus on the 6650 XT comapred to the 5700 XT and thats it.
@Tomas91709 They're all of 1fps apart in all 3 games, so not worse. This suggests those games favor memory bandwidth while the others favor core frequency/count.
Correction: RX 6700 XT Average fps is wrong.
Average fps: 93 and 1% Low: 72
Timestamps:
00:00 Intro
00:14 Indiana Jones and The Great Circle
00:54 S.T.A.L.K.E.R. 2
01:31 God of War Ragnarök
02:09 Black Myth: Wukong
02:48 Cyberpunk 2077: Phantom Liberty
03:26 Silent Hill 2 Remake
04:05 Horizon Forbidden West
04:44 The First Descendant
05:24 Alan Wake 2
06:03 Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
06:42 PUBG Battlegrounds
07:20 Counter Strike 2
08:01 Average FPS
Gaming PC Specifications:
► CPU : AMD Ryzen 5 7600X amzn.to/3RAlT9P
► Motherboard : MSI PRO X670-P WIFI amzn.to/4bb5Tlx
► RAM : 32GB (2*16GB) DDR5 6400MHz CL32 amzn.to/3VAZ6fn
► CPU Cooler : MSI MEG Coreliquid S360 CPU Liquid Cooler amzn.to/3VAzKOn
► PSU : CORSAIR RM1000X - 1000 Watt PSU amzn.to/3RE9sK5
► GAMING SSD : WD BLUE SN570 2TB amzn.to/3VwgD8d
► Recorder : Corsair Elgato HD60 X amzn.to/4c6BZjC
► OS : Windows 11 Pro (x64) Build 24H2
► GPU 1 : ASUS RX 5700 XT TUF GAMING
► GPU 2 : GIGABYTE RX 6650 XT GAMING OC
► GPU 2 : Sapphire RX 6700 XT PULSE (C5 Version)
► Drivers : AMD Adrenalin 24.12.1 Drivers
something is wrong with your avg math at the end... ( 6650 & 6700 being the same and only 5700 being slower )
edit: so 6700XT avg is 88,75 acording to your tests...
Yep, 6700 XT averages are wrong. Probably check the other 2 again just to be sure for those as well.
I'm sorry Correct average fps: 93 and 1% Low: 72
The average score at the end is an error. Look at the entire video. The 6700XT clearly shows it's about 20% faster on average than the 6650XT. Not to mention the extra vram will help out with textures and ray tracing.
just snatched a used rx 6700 xt for 141 us dollar last month.
Is this price in rupees?🤭 You would need at least 200-250 euros for this card in EU!
@@MantasNan it's USD, the key is patient to wait the day some people listing the under priced gpu and you need to be fast also before somebody else get it.
I wonder how you're getting that low FPS on the 5700 XT. I'm still rocking that card at 1440p and I'm getting around the same fps you are but you're at 1080p???
average fps for 12 games is not good/// 6650xt and 6700xt has the same score
Your just seeing the very high presets for the games so of course the FPS would not be as good
@@RealABGamerBoy The 6700 XT is about 20% faster than the 6650 XT in all tested games here but they have identical averages in the final section. Those average numbers are wrong.
I'm sorry 6700 XT average fps is wrong correct average fps: 93 and 1% low: 72
How is 6650 XT worse than 5700 XT in some games ?
where ? the 6600/6650 XT is way better then the 5700 XT cause of power draw, ray tracing support, driver support, game optimisation.
Only downside is the 128 bit bus on the 6650 XT comapred to the 5700 XT and thats it.
@@04KamilWyszynski20sh2 remake, gowr, black myth wukong
@Tomas91709 They're all of 1fps apart in all 3 games, so not worse. This suggests those games favor memory bandwidth while the others favor core frequency/count.