Boeing 737MAX Cockpit Tour

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 21 лип 2024
  • Come with me on a Tour of the Boeing 737MAX cockpit. I will show you differences between the MAX and the NG and I will even start up the engine and show you some cool differences in the Jet Engine start sequence.
    I just happened to find this empty Boeing 737MAX simulator littering around in a Simulator centre in London and thought I should take you for a tour when I had the chance. The video quality is not great in the beginning since I didn't have my normal camera kit with me but I think you will still get the point.
    Enjoy!
    If you want to discuss the 737MAX or any other aviation related subject, get the FREE Mentour Aviation app, using the links below!
    📲IOS: appstore.com/mentouraviation
    📲Android: play.google.com/store/apps/de...
    Join my Patreon crew, and help me preview videos and thumbnails 👇🏻
    / mentourpilot
    To follow my life on instagram, use the link below 👇🏻
    / mentour_pilot
    My website, which will soon become SIGNIFICANTLY cooler, below 👇🏻
    www.mentourpilot.com

КОМЕНТАРІ • 946

  • @paulf1071
    @paulf1071 5 років тому +22

    Even parked at the gate, the simulator looks so life-like!

  • @herblison3374
    @herblison3374 5 років тому +27

    The presenter has a remarkable ability to explain complex aviation topics to non-experts. His presentations
    make me wish I could book flights where he is captain. This also makes me wonder whether the general
    public can find out the safety records of individual pilots before taking a flight.

    • @surideedesigns
      @surideedesigns 7 місяців тому

      Safety record? Like how many fatal crashes they've had in the past? 😅

    • @SshivamKhopkar
      @SshivamKhopkar 6 місяців тому +1

      12:41 He says starter cut out. How ever that is the voice recorder tick sound. Not the starter cut out. Starter cut out is when start valve open light extinguishes!

    • @billybigballs196
      @billybigballs196 3 місяці тому

      1 crash for every 11 million flights kid, calm down ​@@surideedesigns

  • @sam-feet.paws.hooves4564
    @sam-feet.paws.hooves4564 5 років тому +186

    "it's not like I'm just randomly starting an engine" hahaha :D

  • @Hondalover3000
    @Hondalover3000 5 років тому +53

    The cockpit may have its usual 60s technology but with a bit of an upgrade to 80s to current technology with those screens. Sort of like in star trek to star trek tng tech. :)

    • @ACPilot
      @ACPilot 5 років тому +3

      Hondalover3000 - It works really well, and it is a joy to fly..

    • @Hondalover3000
      @Hondalover3000 5 років тому +2

      @@ACPilot Ok cool.

    • @ACPilot
      @ACPilot 5 років тому +2

      William Jones-Halibut - As far as i know it is not because of the screens, but to make room for the FMS keypad and screen. Initial 737-100/200’s did not have that luxury back in the days.

    • @auronoxe
      @auronoxe 5 років тому +1

      The screens resolution and graphics quality looks more like an 80th Amiga Commodore at best... Not like 21st century.

    • @ACPilot
      @ACPilot 5 років тому +4

      auronoxe - It is a cockpit, not a TV.. 😂 Very nice displays, better layout and newer than on the A320 NEO..

  • @rawolf1475
    @rawolf1475 5 років тому +23

    As an aspiring pilot, thank you for a glimpse into the future of my career. Your videos are always very well explained and easy to keep focused.

  • @Nilguiri
    @Nilguiri 5 років тому +20

    Patxi's wife, Molly, is looking after the kids by herself while lucky old Patxi is still celebrating, dancing about, smoking tiny cigars and looking very pleased with himself!

  • @Steven-xd5kn
    @Steven-xd5kn 5 років тому +8

    Best informative flight channel 👍
    Some of the biased channels on the MAX can get tiring. Appreciate your pure unbiased position when seeking info.

  • @rafaelklein8235
    @rafaelklein8235 5 років тому +64

    Thumbs up for the puppies by the end!

  • @richstorr1454
    @richstorr1454 5 років тому +11

    Hi mentour! Great video the new 4 screen layout was taken off the Dreamliner? And also to be implemented into the 777X I believe. Seen a lot of the 787 screens to recognise! Great vid hope boeing sort the 737M out soon!

    • @get_emld
      @get_emld 5 років тому +1

      The 777x will also have touchscreens.

  • @heronimousbrapson863
    @heronimousbrapson863 5 років тому +236

    Unfortunately, the technical problems are probably easier to fix than the lack of public confidence.

    • @supertrix101
      @supertrix101 5 років тому +36

      The Boeing 737 Max's reputation is now badly damaged just like the Douglas DC10's in the 1970s when the DC10 suffered some serious / fatal accidents due to a combination of design flaws, technical problems, maintenance errors, and pilot errors.

    • @geoffphuketInPhuket
      @geoffphuketInPhuket 5 років тому

      @@ysfsim uniformed median ???

    • @GH-oi2jf
      @GH-oi2jf 5 років тому +6

      Tubmaster 5000 - I think that’s better than the other way around. You can’t control public opinion, put you can control the technical issues. When they start flying again, most people who have qualms will get over it.

    • @GH-oi2jf
      @GH-oi2jf 5 років тому +13

      supertrix101 - Despite it’s reputation, the DC-10 remained in service for many years after its early troubles. People flew on it - even those like me who didn’t like it, because it took us where we needed to go. I feel much better about the 737 Max than I did about the DC-10. The Max is an excellent aircraft which had one horrible defect. It’s been fixed and it’s time to move on, in my opinion.

    • @Valantir
      @Valantir 5 років тому +12

      Big thing is most public can't tell and 800ng from an max 8.

  • @stoffls
    @stoffls 5 років тому +2

    Great video, love those cockpit videos!
    And congrats to the puppies! Now I want a video of Mentour on his sofa, surrounded by all his puppies, trying to get his attention ;-)
    Or a bunch of puppies in the cockpit - although I am afraid this is not allowed, not even in the simulator.

  • @lisaproust638
    @lisaproust638 5 років тому +1

    I love planes and I absolutely adore your videos. The cadence of your voice makes very complex information easy to understand :) thank you for all your videos :)

  • @rudolfhuijs4526
    @rudolfhuijs4526 5 років тому +10

    Thanks for the video. Congrats for the puppies! It seems to me those puppies will grow and become parents before the Max 8 flies again.

  • @ThomasDanielsen1000
    @ThomasDanielsen1000 5 років тому +16

    As soon as I saw the announcement of some Paxti-action I jumped right to the end of the video. Sorry Mentour, but these dogs are just too adorable :)

  • @nigeldewallens1115
    @nigeldewallens1115 5 років тому

    What wonderful puppies you now have! Good luck with that and to the dear dogs too ;) I am thoroughly enjoying your channel! Good luck with it all!

  • @Gigi-vq7xs
    @Gigi-vq7xs 5 років тому +1

    Thanks for this cockpit video of B737 MAX with some additional updates.

  • @sandykwan8346
    @sandykwan8346 5 років тому +134

    Can you take the simulator for a quick spin around the block?

    • @mipmipmipmipmip
      @mipmipmipmipmip 5 років тому +9

      the simulator was built by $9/hour outsourced Indian engineers, so I guess Boeing itself doesn't know.

    • @jpaufsc
      @jpaufsc 5 років тому +12

      @@mipmipmipmipmip Most of these simulators are actually built in Canada by CAE. Boeing really doesn't build simulators themselves. At least not for commercial applications.

    • @mipmipmipmipmip
      @mipmipmipmipmip 4 роки тому +2

      @@jpaufsc Yeah makes sense. I guess there's software needed to make sure Boeing's functionality is represented in a simulation, which is something that can only be done in assignment by Boeing according to their specs.

  • @kiet4953
    @kiet4953 5 років тому +5

    Thanks for a great video Mentour Pilot !

  • @Jacob-r4w
    @Jacob-r4w 5 років тому +1

    Omg I love that new logo with the animation at the beginning!

  • @dominicfede5916
    @dominicfede5916 5 років тому +2

    Love your explanations Fantastic, thank you so much for the time you give us explaining things, I love it, it is really amazing.

  • @MultiSpaceDude
    @MultiSpaceDude 3 роки тому +3

    A note: the MOTORING segment of the CFM-LEAP startup is typically faster (a few seconds). The reason why the FADEC motors the engine longer in this case was because the engine was still hot from the previous shutdown (EGT initially shows 196 deg), and needs to cool down first to reduce the chance for a Hot Start

  • @ryanm1276
    @ryanm1276 5 років тому +7

    Keep up the good work Petter! Already liked as you’ve set such a high standard.

  • @bog-monster
    @bog-monster 2 роки тому +1

    As always another fantastic video ! 👍💯👌

  • @laurieh9411
    @laurieh9411 5 років тому +2

    The doggies are cute!!!! Thanks for the videos always awesome

  • @ecclestonsangel
    @ecclestonsangel 5 років тому +14

    Molly's got babies! Awwwww! What does Patxi think of them! So sweet! Boys or girls? You got a houseful now, Petter! Congrats!

    • @SpamMouse
      @SpamMouse 5 років тому +3

      Paxti & Molly are so considerate to allow Petter to talk about planes on their doggie channel.

    • @ecclestonsangel
      @ecclestonsangel 5 років тому +1

      @@SpamMouse lol, indeed!

  • @SuperWilster
    @SuperWilster 5 років тому +3

    The NG is great. But still can't wait to get my hands on the max!

  • @airfoxtrot2006
    @airfoxtrot2006 5 років тому +1

    Great video Mentour i enjoyed it, hope you are having a good Summer.

  • @GlitchedBot
    @GlitchedBot 5 років тому

    It's always good coming from someone who know whats the actual situation is or who understands what could be the possible outcome.. The media says anything and everything

  • @julzb7165
    @julzb7165 5 років тому +6

    Brilliant video and explanation of the cockpit instruments. I admit that should the airline we use start the max in service I'd rebook for an another alternative..........unless you were the captain 😎👍

    • @AviationNut
      @AviationNut 5 років тому +2

      I personally would feel very safe on the Max when it comes back into service. After all the fixes and inspections by aviation experts the 737Max aircraft will probably be the safest aircraft in the sky. There is absolutely no way Boeing would allow one more of their aircraft to go down because they know they would never recover and all the airlines would take their business to Airbus. So I personally feel the 737max will be the safest aircraft in the sky, Boeing simply can not afford one more crash to happen or it's over for them. When the 737max comes back I will happily fly on one and I would feel safe putting my family on one.

    • @Acroposthion
      @Acroposthion 5 років тому +1

      Boeing’s 737 is only the *most successful and safest* jet aircraft series in history. But hey, you DO get a little more hip room on an A320....
      Media conjecture and hyperbole do not make for an unsafe aircraft!
      Operators pushing malfunctioning aircraft into continued service = problems.
      Operators pushing for minimalist ‘Difference Training,’ will inevitably get what they paid for.

  • @Prince_Ali_2-255
    @Prince_Ali_2-255 5 років тому +4

    I was wondering why the EGT was noticeably higher during engine start. Then I noticed the TAT +99C! Man that’s hot! Gotta love simulators cause there’s no way in hell I would ever work or live anywhere that hot!

  • @Hjossi88
    @Hjossi88 5 років тому +1

    Might have missed it if you mentioned it, but you can switch the engine instrument over to the FO and have the big nav display on CPT side.

  • @SUKHPV73
    @SUKHPV73 5 років тому +1

    Very interesting & interactive video awesome videos are coming these days just love to sath this channel awesome .....No pilot except captain joe makes so intresting videos like you I hope some day you both can collab and make some interesting video on Boeing.

  • @billthomas635
    @billthomas635 5 років тому +79

    Where's the Chemtrails On/Off switch? :D

    • @cancelanime1507
      @cancelanime1507 5 років тому +6

      🤣🤣🤣

    • @svartir6668
      @svartir6668 5 років тому +9

      Engine Master Switches: Chemtrail-Engine on = Producing Chemtrails. Side effect is thrust being generated :o)

    • @novo6462
      @novo6462 5 років тому +7

      Its on the aft overhead next to the 'excite gullibility' switch.

    • @doctorstrangelove8815
      @doctorstrangelove8815 5 років тому +5

      The CTU (chemical trail unit) engages automatically when you fly over your current mother in law or any ex-wife.

    • @Hunter_Bidens_Crackpipe_
      @Hunter_Bidens_Crackpipe_ 5 років тому +2

      It is controlled from the ground and defaults on.

  • @JohannesSchlund
    @JohannesSchlund 5 років тому +4

    Check it out, whether you can switch the engine display to the FO's side, when the Captain is flying, that's the question which arises to me!

    • @mrbantersam3420
      @mrbantersam3420 5 років тому +3

      You can, just like on 787 :) i know some airlines has sop that it's the pilot flying having the Big ND, and pilot monitoring having ND/Engine

  • @georgeb6909
    @georgeb6909 4 роки тому

    Great video! I'm going to be a pilot in the near future and i really enjoy your videos, keep it up👌

  • @joeyarbrough7107
    @joeyarbrough7107 4 роки тому

    Your puppies are simply adorable. I truly enjoy watching your channel.

  • @g_blue_2737
    @g_blue_2737 5 років тому +3

    love your channel, really informative and interesting!
    Thanks keep this good stuff up!

  • @jukajoj2400
    @jukajoj2400 5 років тому +46

    Last time I was this early, the 737 max was still flying

  • @elizabethannferrario7113
    @elizabethannferrario7113 5 років тому

    Great Mentour thank you looks amazing !

  • @rogersheth404
    @rogersheth404 3 роки тому

    I love your videos - keep the coming!

  • @raptorekpl
    @raptorekpl 5 років тому +91

    Could you please talk about the economics of the planes being grounded? I mean this is a very expensive equipment rendered unoperational for it’s commercial user. How do Airlines and Boeing deal with that?

    • @darkprose
      @darkprose 5 років тому +7

      Good question. I’m wondering about that too.

    • @mvonsmallhausen3221
      @mvonsmallhausen3221 5 років тому +4

      And what happens to the pilots who don't get to do any flying.

    • @tomstravels520
      @tomstravels520 5 років тому +4

      M Von Smallhausen well if the airline had the NG they’ll be flying that. But if not then no idea

    • @thammanoonkamfunt5470
      @thammanoonkamfunt5470 5 років тому +2

      Boeing must to pay a very big money for the airline or very good offer the free service for long times !

    • @Ryanistheone
      @Ryanistheone 5 років тому +3

      They take heavy losses and have to rely on company assets to lighten the damage (savings, sell other planes, layoffs, etc)

  • @miasteam1828
    @miasteam1828 5 років тому +4

    We need a full podcast just on the dogs :)

  • @Bob3519
    @Bob3519 5 років тому +1

    Beautiful puppies. Glad all are doing well. 😍

  • @Rhinozherous
    @Rhinozherous 4 роки тому

    Thank you so much for all your explainations and work!

  • @guesswho1231
    @guesswho1231 5 років тому +8

    1:55 space shuttle status. 😂

  • @2905sid
    @2905sid 5 років тому +161

    Mentour accidentally showed the airline livery. Realizing his mistake, he quickly turned his camera away. Haha.

    • @buffysaviation
      @buffysaviation 5 років тому +1

      Siddharth Pathak What time?

    • @buffysaviation
      @buffysaviation 5 років тому +28

      Never mind, found it at 13:40

    • @s125ish
      @s125ish 5 років тому +17

      Christopher Taylor obviously he works at Ryanair

    • @Horizon301.
      @Horizon301. 5 років тому +1

      s125ish Norwegian isn’t it?

    • @CMDRSweeper
      @CMDRSweeper 5 років тому +10

      True, a bit surprising... But the other thing that really surprised me was "There are other aircraft in the sim"?
      And then the details of them too, so you did surprise me with that one Mentour :D

  • @Chris_at_Home
    @Chris_at_Home 3 роки тому +1

    This sure ain’t the same as a P3 Orion cockpit that I worked on as an avionics tech in the early 70s. I really enjoy your videos. I have flown on many different types of aircraft, fixed wing and rotary wing, traveling around Alaska for my job.

  • @darkprose
    @darkprose 5 років тому +1

    Love the new intro graphics!

  • @annemargaret5562
    @annemargaret5562 5 років тому +41

    Wait, what?! Patxi is a dad?! Congratulations to Patxi and Molly!

  • @SonOfZeusGaming
    @SonOfZeusGaming 5 років тому +3

    oohh the puppies!

  • @ardongrainford8004
    @ardongrainford8004 Рік тому

    Really good video as always. Good explanation and c,ear.

  • @baldurorlygsson6193
    @baldurorlygsson6193 5 років тому +1

    Hey, thank you for your great videos ! In later years I have become afraid of flying even if I love it and am very interested about it. Could you please do an episode about things like turbulence, how much puninshment an airliner can take and other nasty experiances of the unknowing scared people ?

  • @bearcubdaycare
    @bearcubdaycare 5 років тому +3

    Cute pups.

  • @t.w.3
    @t.w.3 5 років тому +3

    Nice video. Interesting to see the time needed for the engine to start. Thanks. Beautiful puppies! :) Greetings from Norway.

  • @paulmurphy42
    @paulmurphy42 5 років тому +1

    Well done as always

  • @plasmaburndeath
    @plasmaburndeath 5 років тому +1

    Yay always love new content

  • @loriley347
    @loriley347 5 років тому +2

    Would you be happy flying this 737
    If boeing does nothing to make the
    Manual trim wheel easier to turn

  • @francotrofimovich7016
    @francotrofimovich7016 5 років тому +5

    Amazing captain! Greetings from Argentina!

  • @shaunakbhangre1612
    @shaunakbhangre1612 3 роки тому +2

    It’s finally back in the air 😁😁

  • @tuffy6116
    @tuffy6116 5 років тому +2

    Nice video your my favourite captain

  • @robertdamico1
    @robertdamico1 3 роки тому +14

    This aircraft has gone under more scrutiny than any other aircraft has. However, I completely understand why. The good news is now that the aircraft has been cleared to be put into service in the USA and Europe, it will be the safest aircraft in the sky bar none!

    • @2point7182818284590
      @2point7182818284590 2 роки тому +1

      This aircraft doesn't even have an Engine Indicating and Crew Alerting System (EICAS) which is mandatory since years for new planes but got lobbied away somehow. No, this absolutely is not the safest plane and it definitely never will be as Boeing already made clear that they never ever will upgrade the 737 MAX cockpit to current safety standards.

  • @colin8653
    @colin8653 5 років тому +2

    I also think part of the problem is all of the airlines and the FAA must be looking at this problem is it is the second
    airplane to have been grounded first the 787 Dreamliner and now the 737 Max but at least the 787 Dreamliner had no fatalities
    so i thin Boeing is having to be more exact with the fix for the 737 Max just my view

  • @hlalmuanpuia9850
    @hlalmuanpuia9850 4 роки тому

    Thank you So much for uploading this video

  • @chadpollman7970
    @chadpollman7970 5 років тому

    That’s one incredibly nice iPad you’re sitting in, Petter! (“But they do all their MAX training on an iPad!”) A Level-D iPad, I presume? 😜
    Trying to decide whether this means you are getting prepared to transition to the MAX fleet, or perhaps it is just a little easier to get access to the MAX simulators right now. Maybe it’s both... 🤔
    Congrats on the puppies! (You mean your First Officer hasn’t spent all his time passed out on the sofa? Who’da thunk it!)

  • @matejfele9971
    @matejfele9971 5 років тому +57

    And now it's just a very expensive car.

  • @nishitpandya4709
    @nishitpandya4709 5 років тому +19

    What software did you use to create your intro graphic?
    It's lovely.

    • @ShainAnimations
      @ShainAnimations 5 років тому +5

      Like blabla said, I doubt he made it himself, there's tons of his fans that are artists so someone probably made it for him.
      In terms of software, I'm 99% sure it's Adobe After Effects with a plugin called 'Element 3D' by Video Copilot.

    • @nishitpandya4709
      @nishitpandya4709 5 років тому +1

      @@ShainAnimations Fair point. Thanks.

  • @prasadv4310
    @prasadv4310 Рік тому

    All cool and beautiful display

  • @jamescallaway2907
    @jamescallaway2907 5 років тому

    Really looks good. Looking forward to flying it.

  • @ADJL1331
    @ADJL1331 5 років тому +3

    Maybe the reason for the EGT overheat was the 99°C TAT

  • @boltar2003
    @boltar2003 5 років тому +4

    Not a single mention of MCAS??

  • @hakjak26
    @hakjak26 5 років тому +2

    Hey, Mentour! Why did the TAT show +99C˚ when you started the engine? Great video by the way!

  • @bingeciren
    @bingeciren 5 років тому +2

    Best ending I’ve ever seen. Marvelous🙂 By the way, do you fly to DLM?

  • @unknown-us5vs
    @unknown-us5vs 5 років тому +6

    I want you to make your one day pilot life

  • @zyxyuv1650
    @zyxyuv1650 5 років тому +4

    A leading cause of death is being unable to handle the situation of newly exposed hidden edge cases within the uncompensated parameters that arise AS A RESULT OF TOGGLING AUTOPILOT ON OR OFF. (mostly, OFF)
    I.e. Air France 447 -- could have continued to fly _through the storm_ with AP ON and flight parameters resulting only from compensational feedback loop.

    • @zyxyuv1650
      @zyxyuv1650 5 років тому

      @@GVTSounds You're right about 447 *with an old aircraft only* but I am referring to the fix - i.e. flying a Boeing 828 with AP1, AP2, AP3, ((AP4)), RP1, ((RP2)) and AP3, AP4 have redboxed physical locality and flight sensors on isolated power, and AP3 cannot be disengaged unless Emergency is declared. If the plane is able to execute a disallowed procedure (while not in declared Emergency and before control by AP3 and RP1 or RP2 OR AT ANY TIME by RP2 and AP3 or AP4) without arresting the pilot, it means that the procedure was never specified to begin with.

  • @forrestgumpv9049
    @forrestgumpv9049 5 років тому +1

    Could you show us the MCAS operation as it still exists before any software fixes are implemented. Then another video after the software fixes, microprocessor fix, autopilot fix, and runaway trim fix so we can verify its safe to fly in ?

  • @ulysisxtr
    @ulysisxtr 5 років тому

    Pupper made more puppers!!! How cute!!

  • @forza223bowe5
    @forza223bowe5 5 років тому +4

    Let’s hope it’s safer even it returns to service

  • @HungryGuyStories
    @HungryGuyStories 5 років тому +3

    Fascinating video, as always, Petter. But no way in the warm place am I ever flying on one, no matter what they do to fix it.

  • @petermsull
    @petermsull 3 роки тому +1

    I've always wanted to pull back on the reverse thrust; that must be an assuring feeling!

    • @sharoncassell9358
      @sharoncassell9358 Рік тому

      It helps take pressure & heat wear & tear on brakes in main gear.

  • @SerhanOgan
    @SerhanOgan 5 років тому

    Great channel, beautiful puppies!

  • @michael2k3d48
    @michael2k3d48 5 років тому +4

    Do jet engines experience extra wear when not running for prolonged periods as on the currently grounded 737max fleet? Thank you.

    • @trellofello7473
      @trellofello7473 5 років тому +2

      No abnormal wear whatsoever. Having said that, most of the operators of the grounded aircraft are doing periodic engine runs to keep the engine seals/components etc. lubricated. They will have many checklists to go through, and many hours of work to get an aircraft ready for flight after such a long time being out of service (estimates are between 100 to 150 hours of prep work, per aircraft).

    • @dannnnn496
      @dannnnn496 5 років тому +1

      @@trellofello7473 Yikes, that's a lot of man hours.

  • @shehulsuratwala2684
    @shehulsuratwala2684 5 років тому +25

    Is the information displayed on the screens interchangeable between screens? What if one of them gets damaged during flight?
    I observed some of the information was being displayed only on one screen. In short , there must be some redundancy in information display system. I would like to know about it.

    • @scarsolp
      @scarsolp 5 років тому +3

      If you look where he pressed the "info" button to change the co-pilots display there is a selector knob that allows you to change what each of the inner displays, display.

    • @Valantir
      @Valantir 5 років тому

      Yes it works exactly as you suggest. One screen goes down and you can put it on another display. Pretty sure (not familiar with the max but with other plane) you could lose 3 of 4 and still have all the info you need

    • @ACPilot
      @ACPilot 5 років тому

      You can switch data between the screens..

    • @scottyweimuller6152
      @scottyweimuller6152 5 років тому

      Then you revert to the days before technology dominated planes and fly old school

    • @mytech6779
      @mytech6779 5 років тому +2

      @@scottyweimuller6152 That is a strange statement. A plane is technology.

  • @mnieuwhof
    @mnieuwhof 5 років тому +1

    Nice vid... thank you... I have a question: what kind of simulation software is being used for the outside graphics?

  • @larscp
    @larscp 5 років тому +2

    Very informativ.. Thank you

  • @domantasjakaitis6176
    @domantasjakaitis6176 5 років тому +5

    shouldnt the MAX start to melt, because its 99C?

  • @positronicfeed
    @positronicfeed 5 років тому +13

    Very very safe plane. Now that it's grounded.

  • @daztheman552
    @daztheman552 2 роки тому

    Just sitting on one now, hopefully they are all good 👍

  • @ericlozen9631
    @ericlozen9631 5 років тому

    Great Video

  • @luca7069
    @luca7069 5 років тому +9

    You could have shown the stab trim cut-off switches, since they've been changed from the NG and they're involved in the whole MCAS situation
    Very nice video nonetheless, still nowhere near as cool as the CS/A220 cockpit but a good refresh...just looking at the cockpit you wouldn't say it's a 60+ years old plane

    • @Eternal_Tech
      @Eternal_Tech 5 років тому +1

      For the stab trim cut-ff switches, please see 13:57 .

    • @trenesdecolombiaPabloHiguita
      @trenesdecolombiaPabloHiguita 5 років тому +1

      The stab trim cut off have been in the same place since original B737s.. and still in the Same place in the MAX

    • @luca7069
      @luca7069 5 років тому

      @@trenesdecolombiaPabloHiguita they've been changed in function. On the NG each one did a different part of cutting out electric stab trim control (one was for the autopilot side of thing, the other for the electric trim on the yoke). On the MAX now they both cutoff everything, and one is the primary and the other is just the backup.
      It's pretty crucial in the whole ET302 case if you've read the report

    • @tantegreta
      @tantegreta 5 років тому

      Nav freq displax changed in the pedestal

  • @GarryWan666
    @GarryWan666 5 років тому +8

    When the engine was starting, why TAT was +99 C ???

    • @gordonrichardson2972
      @gordonrichardson2972 5 років тому +7

      Probably an error in previous session, the simulator was not reset.

    • @rayg9069
      @rayg9069 5 років тому +5

      Some quick research, AC buses must be on, an a/c pack needs to be running and if on the ground pitot heat must be off before valid readings from the instrument.

  • @SeanPGribbons
    @SeanPGribbons 2 роки тому

    I’ve flown on the max over half a dozen times nice aircraft very smooth

  • @nataliacodreanu4904
    @nataliacodreanu4904 5 років тому +1

    The dogs are so cute!

  • @danniepushkin5849
    @danniepushkin5849 Рік тому +4

    I flew Boeings and buses (a320 and 747s) and Boeing's cockpits always stood head and shoulders above airbuses. quality , design , feel and finish. Airbuses with their plastic covers and huge panel gaps always felt like some third grade cheapness. Its like comparing Bentley and Kia.

  • @RaimoKangasniemi
    @RaimoKangasniemi 5 років тому +5

    Interesting but to be honest, to my passanger's mindset this planetype would need also structural redesigning not just software changes before I would be ready to fly with it.

  • @thewholeroll
    @thewholeroll Рік тому

    "The new engines are great, but they're quite delicate". Well, that's reassuring! 😂 Just kidding, I knew what you meant!

  • @CarlosAlexandre-fl2ut
    @CarlosAlexandre-fl2ut 5 років тому +1

    High quality video and explanation. As everything Mentor does. Thanks. @phelps

  • @cockatoo010
    @cockatoo010 5 років тому +5

    Hopefully it gets back into the air
    And doesn't crash ever again

    • @Acroposthion
      @Acroposthion 5 років тому +1

      Sebastian Contreras - Oh don’t worry. Some incompetent bastard will find a way to stuff one.

  • @Smingleflorp
    @Smingleflorp 5 років тому +5

    I won’t be impressed until the dash has a coffee dispenser.

    • @MentourPilot
      @MentourPilot  5 років тому +3

      Hahaha! True! I shall bring that forward.

    • @Eternal_Tech
      @Eternal_Tech 5 років тому +1

      It should be a required safety feature. Just make sure that nobody puts decaf in it. ☕ 😊

  • @mikef8639
    @mikef8639 5 років тому +2

    Nice Office!

  • @bjoernaltmann
    @bjoernaltmann 2 роки тому +1

    The 1960s are in there, they have used Futura in quite a few places of this new plane. This font was also used all over the space programme back in the day. Although it’s a nice font (timeless and geometric, designed in 1928, Bauhaus), one would really design a custom font these days that works particularly well on screen. There is really no reason to make everything look like some sort of terminal mode basic pixelated font stuff. Even if it needs to be very basic - maybe it’s more stable this way - the fonts could be changed. The choice of font matters even in a car when it comes to reaction speed. How long it takes you to read something is just quite vital, especially on an aircraft.