Artificial Intelligence and the Future of Healthcare and Biotech

AI has a massive role to play in the big leaps ahead for biotech and human health from enabling us to explore biology in ways never before possible to speeding up the pace at which we discover and deliver new interventions. Hear more on what’s ahead from Anas El Turabi of McKinsey & Company; Jonathan Carlson of Microsoft Health Futures; Generate Biomedicines and Flagship Pioneering’s Mike Nally; and Rory Kelleher of NVIDIA as they join Flagship’s Armen Mkrtchyan to discuss some of the exciting recent developments in the artificial intelligence space.
About Flagship Pioneering:
Flagship Pioneering is a biotechnology company that invents and builds platform companies, each with the potential for multiple transformative human health and sustainability products. Since its launch in 2000, Flagship has originated and fostered more than 100 scientific ventures. The current Flagship ecosystem comprises 44 companies, including Denali Therapeutics, Foghorn Therapeutics, Generate Biomedicines, Inari, Indigo Agriculture, Moderna, Omega Therapeutics, Sana Biotechnology, Seres Therapeutics, and Tessera Therapeutics.
Website: www.flagshipioneering.com
Twitter: @FlagshipPioneer
Linkedin: / flagship-pioneering

[@jonasrichter1153]

it's a wonder what eventualities come together for something like The Third Reich to embrace a concept like master race, a fundamental arrogant posture with an absolute in its reason. Their interests in epigenetics as improvement being violating, and short-sighted, but in all maturity to nature ask what this particular time had to say to the relative, content, farseeing and trivial before it called itself advanced by their means... that's the difference.
It's convergence made by something not able to have that insight anymore.
It wouldn't be until 1946 that the first successful genetic recombination was demonstrated, a methodically more enlightened approach to an otherwise, brutish hand, in a time that wasn't ready.
I wondered if it was not a gesture of maturity out of sight and called to question by science given what the world had just went through.
if I knew that one day my personal interests and insight as a teenager would come to ask me to be patron to the medians of ethic and arrogance in their nuances, ... i would have probably said... "yeah that make sense" , to be honest...
but as it stood, for reasons pertaining to the ominous, respect, and enlightenment, I have a vigilance with a devils advocacy in the nuance of certain issues for personal reasons.
Circa 2017, our biogenetics are in infancy but in intrigue, we can reclone stem cells from their own base source now, we can clone a sheep... intervene in the growth of a plant.
And most recently we demonstrated recombination on a human fetus... the scientist who did that was arrested officially, as it seemed like a gesture of defiance as well as intrigue... we wonder why.
our inventions are only as good as our WHY, that much is determining, and just because , even for science, is not good enough obviously, but there enters every ethic that the subject matter could illicit at once.
what's now more implicating is, the limits of creativity meeting some sort of impressing will, where I suppose in the referencing or intervening, the limits of that which effects and than takes when sequencing, asks for restraint, to as it were, play god. When what's not in control gets compensated for... that's humility, but thats simple as a narrative right now though, I'm just placing its implication here for now, actually what's perhaps at question is how that does in fact in theory pan out hypothetically speaking as a process, as an incrimental and probably otherwise mediating application in all honesty ... but the scare in the future still comes from poignant places.
Intervening, and replacing a gene sequence at early development, asks what we have decided we still held important to us.
it introduces all of the unease even at its most benevolent, what makes us ready to be this direct with ourselves? We understand in an intimate sense what an expecting mother might feel, when in the benevolence of the subject, a doctor having taken a biopsy, approaches them, and says " we have identified the duplication of the 21st chromosone, in other words, Down's Syndrome, would you like to intervene?"
That's scary, and obviously personal, and we are asking about who we are when we are deciding where our diverting regards for what we recognize as valuable are.. at the most conscious of times... the fact that that should be brought to question here, only so insecurly, emphasizes a point of a readiness in our consciousness as it is.
so with that in mind, we are young, and this is not our time for this right now, I think we could all know ourselves at a rudimentary ethic at least, about genetics, there is literally and entire film franchise, and toy line dedicated to the bottom line of a question which is , could you?, should you?.
And at the consideration of what we have to say to our respect in the distant future, benevolently, the answer is yes.
Just not as a fashion statement.
But market value being the measure of value here finally reminding us once again, we are not the people who will undertake this right now.
The catch 22, science is done at the theater of its learning curves.. we will likely do so anyways....
Medicine, not markets.. should mediate those lines.
Otherwise, our maturity in application in the future, what we decide to intervene with, is not decided by a people of whom useful was momentary, but where, worth it, in all forsights, could be asked by us.
Enter our epochal struggle.

[@deandavenport4505]

🙋 'Promosm'

[@TheTobacko1]

INVITAE is my absolute favorite company ❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤