Why INDIA Doesn't Have SKYSCRAPERS Like Other Countries?

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 26 лис 2024

КОМЕНТАРІ • 3 тис.

  • @DEEP_CRITICAL_THINKER
    @DEEP_CRITICAL_THINKER 2 роки тому +3893

    In my opinion , skyscrapers are essential to those countries which have less area and have more population. Its disadvantage is isolation from society.

    • @navneetanand4503
      @navneetanand4503 2 роки тому +140

      Then, India should have skyscrapers (acc. to *you* ) cuz India's population density is too high. I actually *'SUPPORT'* this!

    • @moumikdullah6717
      @moumikdullah6717 2 роки тому +66

      @@navneetanand4503 too tooo toooo!!!!! High!!!!!!

    • @yuvrajvaish1836
      @yuvrajvaish1836 2 роки тому +49

      Wikipedia pe 200+ skyscraper dikha rha

    • @nikhilsingh6243
      @nikhilsingh6243 2 роки тому +79

      @@navneetanand4503 high rise buildings and skyscrapers are two different things.
      Should India have high rise buildings in cities?-- YES(like the unban societies and colonies)
      Should India have skyscrapers?-- ONLY IF NECESSARY
      High rise buildings make more economic sense than skyscrapers.

    • @Dhruv-Kumar
      @Dhruv-Kumar 2 роки тому +68

      Bro skyscrappers look bad to mental health. So called scenery from a skyscrapper house becomes a depressing view in few months

  • @gowin_saini
    @gowin_saini 2 роки тому +933

    Skyscrapers are necessary because India is an agricultural based economy and expansion of cities is costing us the fertile land. I'm from KOTA district of Rajasthan, 10 year ago my village was 9 km away from KOTA and very green but now it is merged in kota. It's very polluted and crime is became common now. So it's better to have a skyscraper than 200 houses along the road.

    • @arnavsingh897
      @arnavsingh897 2 роки тому +26

      Bro skyscrapers or colony me antar hota hai 😅

    • @xyzzxxx
      @xyzzxxx 2 роки тому +117

      @@arnavsingh897 does your reply makes any sense here? When did he say colony and skyscrapers are same

    • @arnavsingh897
      @arnavsingh897 2 роки тому +12

      @@xyzzxxx I mean in that situation, colonies are better because of problems they are facing to make a single skyscraper. 🙂

    • @arnavsingh897
      @arnavsingh897 2 роки тому +8

      And to me it makes more sense to make high rise buildings than skyscrapers in your situation 👍

    • @abhijaykhileri4572
      @abhijaykhileri4572 2 роки тому +8

      Yes , we should use no fertile land for homes eg buildings, factorys etc., and fertile land for agriculture use.

  • @hanifmuhammadahsan1405
    @hanifmuhammadahsan1405 Рік тому +46

    India में जनसंख्या भी बहुत ज्यादा है Skyscrapers कि बहुत ज्यादा जरूरत है 🇮🇳💞 देश के जगह बचाने के लिए Skyscrapers ही एकमात्र उपाय है

  • @rishi3824
    @rishi3824 2 роки тому +2443

    Oggy's city is the best 😁

    • @devilking3765
      @devilking3765 Рік тому +40

      😂😂

    • @Toonvista7028
      @Toonvista7028 Рік тому +53

      Really nice 👍👍

    • @abhishekbaindla3080
      @abhishekbaindla3080 Рік тому +24

      ​@@devilking3765 😮 It was a black hairstyle and it doesn't help with the idea of correct predict

    • @surkk102
      @surkk102 Рік тому +33

      Never ending stairs

    • @Sanjayram2_1_5
      @Sanjayram2_1_5 Рік тому +25

      But really Nobita city is beautiful bcz it's neat and clean and is fixed in colonies kind with water gng bridges

  • @ojasadhikari8486
    @ojasadhikari8486 Рік тому +146

    2:07
    Thank you for mentioning this legendary architect
    I'm an architecture student and it feels nice when people recognise architects and their works...😊

    • @SAMRAT-v7t
      @SAMRAT-v7t Рік тому +12

      Work hard and become greater architect than him..👍 India needs YOU👍

    • @DanishAnsari-tn1up
      @DanishAnsari-tn1up 5 місяців тому

      😏

  • @nrjkr_07
    @nrjkr_07 Рік тому +143

    Indians ko skyscrapers psnd nahi he lekin ghumna inko Dubai or New York psnd he .🤣🤣

    • @Xujin_huc09990
      @Xujin_huc09990 8 місяців тому +5

      😂😂

    • @sushmasingh3107
      @sushmasingh3107 7 місяців тому +7

      Ghumne me or rahne me farak hota hai.

    • @nrjkr_07
      @nrjkr_07 7 місяців тому +3

      @@sushmasingh3107 mtlb Dubai or New York me koi nhi rehta hai

    • @Xujin_huc09990
      @Xujin_huc09990 7 місяців тому

      @@sushmasingh3107 Bharat ka bhavishya

    • @Sanjay.Uikey.750
      @Sanjay.Uikey.750 3 місяці тому +1

      बिकुल 100% सही पकड़े है 😂😂😂

  • @jeetsaha9122
    @jeetsaha9122 2 роки тому +360

    India needs skyscrapers, look at the population density of industrial cities. Having skyscrapers will help reducing horizontal lands, which can be used to make green parks or wetlands or more industries.
    But here's a catch, making skyscrapers in handful of places will limit the devolopment of suburbs and far villages as the major workforce will again start migrating to cities and possibly increase horizontal slum area.

    • @pappu4539
      @pappu4539 2 роки тому +21

      So more smart cities should be built as a solution.

    • @Sara-gl2mg
      @Sara-gl2mg Рік тому +21

      We need a population control law too.

    • @jeetsaha9122
      @jeetsaha9122 Рік тому +7

      @@Sara-gl2mg we already have family management act of 1951.. India's birth/women rate is 1.6 which is below the replacement rate of 2.1 .. we have a control of population already.

    • @jaanvibhanshal3073
      @jaanvibhanshal3073 Рік тому

      The problem is Indians don't like to live in high apartments they want their own built 🏡 home

    • @jog.antani
      @jog.antani Рік тому +3

      ​@@jeetsaha9122its 2 not 1.6

  • @tonmoysarkar7814
    @tonmoysarkar7814 Рік тому +99

    My parents cant live in a skyscrapers, but it's good for populated countries like India,
    And we know many water bodies and forest areas are destroyed for horizontal urbanization

  • @adibaba5
    @adibaba5 Рік тому +475

    I live in Bangalore, and my hometown is Mumbai. I am fond of sky gazing, and I take photos of the moon very often in Bangalore. When I visited Mumbai after 4 years for my cousins wedding, I was happy to see how tall the buildings were and I appreciated them. At night, I went to my apartment terrace, and I couldn't see the moon because of the taller buildings beside me. This made me sad that people cannot enjoy a simple view of sky over there. I rather wish to see open sky than falling in love with tall buildings.

    • @AnkitGupta-cv2iz
      @AnkitGupta-cv2iz Рік тому +9

      Always banglore

    • @vshall.18
      @vshall.18 Рік тому +1

      Where do you live in Bangalore bro

    • @gauravsharma_7
      @gauravsharma_7 Рік тому +7

      Then Reduce population, only solution to tackle this situation.
      I would love to see proper Infrastructure rather than sky.
      Already so much pollution here, I can't even see stars properly.

    • @techguru6875
      @techguru6875 Рік тому

      In country of 150core and population density of 21000 per square kilometers in Mumbai and u want to see sun,moon and twinkling stars. Stupid fellow first u check ur mental health.

    • @mahendraagarwal219
      @mahendraagarwal219 Рік тому +1

      ​@puneetdpYes correct 'leaving city' and not 'living city ',rains have proved again and again

  • @swativyas4758
    @swativyas4758 Рік тому +857

    In India most of the people love their own designed house 🤩

    • @gauravrangnekar
      @gauravrangnekar Рік тому +1

      That's why most of the houses in India are poorly designed and ugly.

    • @arnavthegreat4483
      @arnavthegreat4483 Рік тому +59

      Not in the big cities
      Almost everybody lives there in a appartment

    • @meghashukla7940
      @meghashukla7940 Рік тому +6

      Exactly

    • @Mickymice67
      @Mickymice67 Рік тому +5

      😂😂😂🤣🤣

    • @jivini4886
      @jivini4886 Рік тому +7

      @@arnavthegreat4483 not everyone, few prefer individual personal house with garden etc... At least with the people i have interacted...

  • @Viratkohli-18-chiku
    @Viratkohli-18-chiku 11 місяців тому +19

    I think vertical development is important in India because by horizontal development the fertile land is becoming into pollution hubs causing deforestation. So there is great urge to get vertical development in India

  • @dwshredder4870
    @dwshredder4870 Рік тому +12

    Europe is the perfect example of- Classic beauty beats futuristic marvels .

  • @deshmukhamit632
    @deshmukhamit632 2 роки тому +297

    He is only one who provide true facts and knowlege without biased opinions 🔥

  • @stonehouseshorts
    @stonehouseshorts 2 роки тому +310

    Living in a Tall SkyScraper is really socially isolating ,I live in Mumbai in a Descent tall building and it is not very social compared to my old house .

  • @coldfreeze267
    @coldfreeze267 Рік тому +66

    As an overly populated country India should definitely have more skyscrapers

  • @ekanshsharma5248
    @ekanshsharma5248 Рік тому +58

    As an architect I must say…Bhai Guarav bhai ne science ke sath sath architecture and civil engineering bhi poori padh li hai…😂 apko to koi degree zrurat nhi hai …honestly speaking 🔥🔥

    • @vinayraj231
      @vinayraj231 Рік тому +1

      Bro mujhe apna home banana hai koi achha sa map batao

    • @newheadstart
      @newheadstart Рік тому

      @@vinayraj231 lol

    • @Rohan_7925
      @Rohan_7925 Рік тому

      @@vinayraj231 he is talking about real house not toy model

    • @ekanshsharma5248
      @ekanshsharma5248 Рік тому

      @@vinayraj231 Bilkul contact me then

  • @bollyholly55
    @bollyholly55 2 роки тому +38

    1:35 what a beautiful city ,Pune

  • @promitmullick7716
    @promitmullick7716 Рік тому +33

    In my opinion skyscrapers should made in India in large scale because it can give maximum office space in small area.
    And it is a image of development of a nation and attractive to tourism

  • @suvajitkar9593
    @suvajitkar9593 2 роки тому +28

    Skyscrapers are the future because of the excess population. But those who already live in their own house they wouldn't shift to skyscrapers buildings. But if you're trend followed person you'd definitely like skyscrapers.

  • @theplmotivationofficial
    @theplmotivationofficial Рік тому +230

    Problem is that less skyscrapers means less trees due to more space occupied due to raw houses.

    • @ridhamatri9447
      @ridhamatri9447 Рік тому +4

      True!

    • @gauravsharma_7
      @gauravsharma_7 Рік тому +4

      True..

    • @azadjain8534
      @azadjain8534 3 місяці тому

      Visit Greater Noida and you will see greenery across the city. Raw houses are not problem. We need more planned cities than skyscrapers.

  • @binodrai2874
    @binodrai2874 Рік тому +28

    I believe with our increasing population we need some skyscrapers for sure. So limited but good projects should be included like other developed countries Downtown areas. Make them come up in common areas so they look organised and can be managed better.

  • @Exiide89
    @Exiide89 2 роки тому +432

    India has highly active seismic zones and soft terrain in most of the areas except the Deccan plateau. So, detailed engineering effort is required to design high rise buildings for such conditions.

    • @asterionop8447
      @asterionop8447 2 роки тому +45

      kuch bhi likh diya? 😂 except the northeast and states too near the Himalayas and the fertile northern plains (because it's for agriculture) the whole of India is much stable ,
      the most of asia where skyscrapers are there like singapore eastern china s korea indonesia japan ect. even lie on the pacific ring of fire which is much dangerous than the seismic activity around north/northeast Indian cities 😂

    • @stopcrying9300
      @stopcrying9300 2 роки тому +2

      Isliye farming land kam hote ja rhe hai

    • @radhajadhav7303
      @radhajadhav7303 2 роки тому +1

      Mumbai must do what nature does i e. have the same height as nature sets it. The tallest tree in Mumbai is the coconut tree and that is a maximum of 98 feet tall.
      The tallest building must not have more than 7 floors and the water tank on top.
      That will make the building 98 feet tall.
      Also the FSI must not be more than 1.
      Anything more than this has serious consequences.
      Apart from and more hazardous than the consequences mentioned in the video are the following ones:
      1. If a building is 9 or more floors tall then the only time the sunlight reaches the ground is when the sun rises above the building i.e. when it is overhead at noon. Even worse when 2 nine storeyed (9 floors) buildings are next to each other the sunlight penetration to the ground between these 2 buildings (leave alone 20, 30,40.....100 floors) is only when the sun is overhead for a brief period of time between these 2 buildings.
      This leads to a catastrophe called 'Sick Building Effect' (already a worldwide phenomenon).
      When the sunlight doesn't fall on the walls of the building or doesn't enter the homes or offices in the building, fungus grows not only on the walls outside and inside the homes or offices but also in the a/c ducts, shafts and other places i e. everywhere. This fungus harbours viruses and bacteria in a symbiotic relationship. This fungus, bacteria and virus gets suspended in the air along with moisture and causes deadly and/or chronic diseases including cancer, tuberculosis. and chronic respiratory disorders amongst others. The only way to get rid of this fungus is to plaster the walls newly only to have the fungus return in no time. Leave alone the a/c ducts/shafts.
      2. Also since there is no sunlight penetration on the ground including roads and footpaths to sanitize them there is fungal,bacterial and viral growth which cause diseases including cancer,tb, chronic respiratory disorders amongst others.
      Also since sunlight doesn't fall on human beings the vitamin D in their bodies doesn't get activated which leads to a variety of disorders including kidney failure.
      3. Also without sunlight the trees and plants on the road die. There is not a single tree on the roads of New York. Trees are half of our respiratory system. We breath in oxygen and give out carbon dioxide and the trees breath in that carbon dioxide and give out oxygen. Without trees humans will die.
      4. Now an FSI (Floor Space Index) of 1 means the ratio of total area of all floors built on the plot of land for people to live in to the area of the open space left on that plot of land is 1. That means the total floor area built and the open space area on that plot of land is the same. As the ratio of total floor area built to the open space area on that plot of land increases the number of people coming out not only on the open space on the plot but also on the road outside that building increases. The number of people using the basic amenities including roads, transportation (trains,buses,taxes,rickshas,cars and other vehicles), hospitals, clinics, schools and more increases which leads to stampedes and deaths as the one that occured at a railway station in Mumbai. This leads to shortage of expert doctors leading to death. This leads to traffic congestion and accidents and hence death.
      This leads to no parking space and hazardous levels of pollution/unit area and hence death.
      5. Buildings taller than 7floors and/or an FSI of more than 1 means the sun rises much later and sets much earlier and even during the day there is no daylight as there is no sunlight penetration.
      This leads to a higher usage of electricity for artificial lighting even during daytime leading to triple or quadruple electricity bills as compared to normal.
      In New York lights are turned on at 2 p m. in the afternoon. Sometimes lights are on all day long in NY.
      6. The problem that since Mumbai is an island it cannot grow horizontally is not a problem at all. Its an excuse by the politicians and builder nexus to build skyscrapers and coastal roads on expensive Mumbai land to make quick and huge money at the expense of destroying nature (and its beauty), sane living in and sane development of Mumbai.
      The island must be connected (seperated by the Ulhas river) to its surrounding cities that are NaviMumbai, Thane, Vasai-Virar by bridges across the river ( bridges already existing and Trans Harbour Link across Thane creek coming up) and further by roads (roads already existing) and metros to Kalyan-Dombivli, Panvel, Badlapur. Not by making insane coastal roads in the ocean destroying all the open spaces (beaches) and views (the sea,the horizon, the sky, the sunset) and the underwater flora and fauna (including planktons that light up the sea at night).
      Having the height of any building at a maximum of 98 feet and the FSI at a maximum of 1 is a must.

    • @radhajadhav7303
      @radhajadhav7303 2 роки тому

      @@asterionop8447
      Mumbai must do what nature does i e. have the same height as nature sets it. The tallest tree in Mumbai is the coconut tree and that is a maximum of 98 feet tall.
      The tallest building must not have more than 7 floors and the water tank on top.
      That will make the building 98 feet tall.
      Also the FSI must not be more than 1.
      Anything more than this has serious consequences.
      Apart from and more hazardous than the consequences mentioned in the video are the following ones:
      1. If a building is 9 or more floors tall then the only time the sunlight reaches the ground is when the sun rises above the building i.e. when it is overhead at noon. Even worse when 2 nine storeyed (9 floors) buildings are next to each other the sunlight penetration to the ground between these 2 buildings (leave alone 20, 30,40.....100 floors) is only when the sun is overhead for a brief period of time between these 2 buildings.
      This leads to a catastrophe called 'Sick Building Effect' (already a worldwide phenomenon).
      When the sunlight doesn't fall on the walls of the building or doesn't enter the homes or offices in the building, fungus grows not only on the walls outside and inside the homes or offices but also in the a/c ducts, shafts and other places i e. everywhere. This fungus harbours viruses and bacteria in a symbiotic relationship. This fungus, bacteria and virus gets suspended in the air along with moisture and causes deadly and/or chronic diseases including cancer, tuberculosis. and chronic respiratory disorders amongst others. The only way to get rid of this fungus is to plaster the walls newly only to have the fungus return in no time. Leave alone the a/c ducts/shafts.
      2. Also since there is no sunlight penetration on the ground including roads and footpaths to sanitize them there is fungal,bacterial and viral growth which cause diseases including cancer,tb, chronic respiratory disorders amongst others.
      Also since sunlight doesn't fall on human beings the vitamin D in their bodies doesn't get activated which leads to a variety of disorders including kidney failure.
      3. Also without sunlight the trees and plants on the road die. There is not a single tree on the roads of New York. Trees are half of our respiratory system. We breath in oxygen and give out carbon dioxide and the trees breath in that carbon dioxide and give out oxygen. Without trees humans will die.
      4. Now an FSI (Floor Space Index) of 1 means the ratio of total area of all floors built on the plot of land for people to live in to the area of the open space left on that plot of land is 1. That means the total floor area built and the open space area on that plot of land is the same. As the ratio of total floor area built to the open space area on that plot of land increases the number of people coming out not only on the open space on the plot but also on the road outside that building increases. The number of people using the basic amenities including roads, transportation (trains,buses,taxes,rickshas,cars and other vehicles), hospitals, clinics, schools and more increases which leads to stampedes and deaths as the one that occured at a railway station in Mumbai. This leads to shortage of expert doctors leading to death. This leads to traffic congestion and accidents and hence death.
      This leads to no parking space and hazardous levels of pollution/unit area and hence death.
      5. Buildings taller than 7floors and/or an FSI of more than 1 means the sun rises much later and sets much earlier and even during the day there is no daylight as there is no sunlight penetration.
      This leads to a higher usage of electricity for artificial lighting even during daytime leading to triple or quadruple electricity bills as compared to normal.
      In New York lights are turned on at 2 p m. in the afternoon. Sometimes lights are on all day long in NY.
      6. The problem that since Mumbai is an island it cannot grow horizontally is not a problem at all. Its an excuse by the politicians and builder nexus to build skyscrapers and coastal roads on expensive Mumbai land to make quick and huge money at the expense of destroying nature (and its beauty), sane living in and sane development of Mumbai.
      The island must be connected (seperated by the Ulhas river) to its surrounding cities that are NaviMumbai, Thane, Vasai-Virar by bridges across the river ( bridges already existing and Trans Harbour Link across Thane creek coming up) and further by roads (roads already existing) and metros to Kalyan-Dombivli, Panvel, Badlapur. Not by making insane coastal roads in the ocean destroying all the open spaces (beaches) and views (the sea,the horizon, the sky, the sunset) and the underwater flora and fauna (including planktons that light up the sea at night).
      Having the height of any building at a maximum of 98 feet and the FSI at a maximum of 1 is a must.

    • @radhajadhav7303
      @radhajadhav7303 2 роки тому

      @@stopcrying9300
      Mumbai must do what nature does i e. have the same height as nature sets it. The tallest tree in Mumbai is the coconut tree and that is a maximum of 98 feet tall.
      The tallest building must not have more than 7 floors and the water tank on top.
      That will make the building 98 feet tall.
      Also the FSI must not be more than 1.
      Anything more than this has serious consequences.
      Apart from and more hazardous than the consequences mentioned in the video are the following ones:
      1. If a building is 9 or more floors tall then the only time the sunlight reaches the ground is when the sun rises above the building i.e. when it is overhead at noon. Even worse when 2 nine storeyed (9 floors) buildings are next to each other the sunlight penetration to the ground between these 2 buildings (leave alone 20, 30,40.....100 floors) is only when the sun is overhead for a brief period of time between these 2 buildings.
      This leads to a catastrophe called 'Sick Building Effect' (already a worldwide phenomenon).
      When the sunlight doesn't fall on the walls of the building or doesn't enter the homes or offices in the building, fungus grows not only on the walls outside and inside the homes or offices but also in the a/c ducts, shafts and other places i e. everywhere. This fungus harbours viruses and bacteria in a symbiotic relationship. This fungus, bacteria and virus gets suspended in the air along with moisture and causes deadly and/or chronic diseases including cancer, tuberculosis. and chronic respiratory disorders amongst others. The only way to get rid of this fungus is to plaster the walls newly only to have the fungus return in no time. Leave alone the a/c ducts/shafts.
      2. Also since there is no sunlight penetration on the ground including roads and footpaths to sanitize them there is fungal,bacterial and viral growth which cause diseases including cancer,tb, chronic respiratory disorders amongst others.
      Also since sunlight doesn't fall on human beings the vitamin D in their bodies doesn't get activated which leads to a variety of disorders including kidney failure.
      3. Also without sunlight the trees and plants on the road die. There is not a single tree on the roads of New York. Trees are half of our respiratory system. We breath in oxygen and give out carbon dioxide and the trees breath in that carbon dioxide and give out oxygen. Without trees humans will die.
      4. Now an FSI (Floor Space Index) of 1 means the ratio of total area of all floors built on the plot of land for people to live in to the area of the open space left on that plot of land is 1. That means the total floor area built and the open space area on that plot of land is the same. As the ratio of total floor area built to the open space area on that plot of land increases the number of people coming out not only on the open space on the plot but also on the road outside that building increases. The number of people using the basic amenities including roads, transportation (trains,buses,taxes,rickshas,cars and other vehicles), hospitals, clinics, schools and more increases which leads to stampedes and deaths as the one that occured at a railway station in Mumbai. This leads to shortage of expert doctors leading to death. This leads to traffic congestion and accidents and hence death.
      This leads to no parking space and hazardous levels of pollution/unit area and hence death.
      5. Buildings taller than 7floors and/or an FSI of more than 1 means the sun rises much later and sets much earlier and even during the day there is no daylight as there is no sunlight penetration.
      This leads to a higher usage of electricity for artificial lighting even during daytime leading to triple or quadruple electricity bills as compared to normal.
      In New York lights are turned on at 2 p m. in the afternoon. Sometimes lights are on all day long in NY.
      6. The problem that since Mumbai is an island it cannot grow horizontally is not a problem at all. Its an excuse by the politicians and builder nexus to build skyscrapers and coastal roads on expensive Mumbai land to make quick and huge money at the expense of destroying nature (and its beauty), sane living in and sane development of Mumbai.
      The island must be connected (seperated by the Ulhas river) to its surrounding cities that are NaviMumbai, Thane, Vasai-Virar by bridges across the river ( bridges already existing and Trans Harbour Link across Thane creek coming up) and further by roads (roads already existing) and metros to Kalyan-Dombivli, Panvel, Badlapur. Not by making insane coastal roads in the ocean destroying all the open spaces (beaches) and views (the sea,the horizon, the sky, the sunset) and the underwater flora and fauna (including planktons that light up the sea at night).
      Having the height of any building at a maximum of 98 feet and the FSI at a maximum of 1 is a must.

  • @sakshamkapse3615
    @sakshamkapse3615 2 роки тому +64

    Indians are so down to earth.....🫂🫂

  • @Gauravprasad07
    @Gauravprasad07 Рік тому +7

    Stay down to earth👍always this is quality of india. Its seems prety cool large skyscrapers large infrastructures but its threat to environment too . I wish india should develop at ground level best version in world ♥️👍

  • @Annihilatr_
    @Annihilatr_ 2 роки тому +26

    India's capital , delhi , only got stopped from getting skyscrapers due to DDA and not getting privatisation, meanwhile private companies in Mumbai got permissions and see mumbai has got majority of India's skyscrapers
    This also led to unauthorised colonies in delhi

    • @balkishunsah3275
      @balkishunsah3275 2 роки тому

      डीडीए चुटिया हैं। But yahan woh concern nahi hain। Political & bureaucracy & bhu mafia ke wajah se dilli barbad hui hain। But Delhi ko skyscrapper sirf central business district mein banane CHAHIYEH। Ek tarike ki kachra आबादी हर जगह भर गई हैं दिल्ली में। भू माफिया के पूरे कब्जे में हैं।

  • @Sanatani_Sherni
    @Sanatani_Sherni 2 роки тому +145

    Indian Foreign Policy on BEAST MODE 🔥
    93,000/0 still remains Unbeatable 🇮🇳❤️

    • @kauramarjeet3014
      @kauramarjeet3014 2 роки тому

      Yea lol poor pakistanis

    • @adarshgantayatrawagent7420
      @adarshgantayatrawagent7420 2 роки тому +9

      Jyotika Sharma is on beast mode 🔥🙌🏻.
      You keep on commenting the same line in every youtube video 😂.

    • @xyz_205
      @xyz_205 2 роки тому +5

      May be she is in modi media cell😂😂

    • @noobanimation8503
      @noobanimation8503 2 роки тому

      What is. 93,000/0 ??

    • @xyzzxxx
      @xyzzxxx 2 роки тому +6

      @@noobanimation8503 93k pak soldiers surrendered to india in indo-pak war

  • @rayedshamim7329
    @rayedshamim7329 Рік тому +35

    One way to solve skyscraper problem is to include offices and general store in them with living apartments so that traveling can be avoided altogether.

    • @tronortron
      @tronortron Рік тому +1

      Genius

    • @NavneetKrSingh24
      @NavneetKrSingh24 Рік тому +1

      Agree bro should be develop these skycrappers in those areas where tourism flourished and official works are predominantly followed there

  • @dropo7959
    @dropo7959 2 роки тому +108

    We indians and our culture is really unique and we must be proud of it.

    • @agnibhamukherjee5823
      @agnibhamukherjee5823 2 роки тому

      No it is against nature

    • @Dhruv-Kumar
      @Dhruv-Kumar 2 роки тому +11

      Skyscrappers is not our culture. Imagine Varanasi and Ayodhya full of skyscrapperz 🤢

    • @noobanimation8503
      @noobanimation8503 2 роки тому +13

      What nonsense 🤣

    • @xyzzxxx
      @xyzzxxx 2 роки тому

      @@Dhruv-Kumar brainless laal chaddis
      Tum logo ki vajah se endia hamesha poor aur dirty country hi rahega

    • @souvikroy4705
      @souvikroy4705 2 роки тому +13

      We want skyscrapers

  • @user-j7y9wIl
    @user-j7y9wIl 2 роки тому +215

    🙏I think all the restrictions on building huge skyscrapers must be remove by the government let's India🇮🇳 grow up vertically and save the jungles, save agriculture land🚩🚩🚩❤️❤️🔔🔔

    • @aka754
      @aka754 2 роки тому +8

      You are right

    • @okbaby8494
      @okbaby8494 2 роки тому +7

      Aeroplane landing ke liye bhi scochna hota hai

    • @shouvikpathak5501
      @shouvikpathak5501 2 роки тому +55

      @@okbaby8494 Acha... China main shayad aeroplane land nahi hota 🧐

    • @VICKY_AEKER
      @VICKY_AEKER 2 роки тому +8

      @@shouvikpathak5501 😅

    • @INSANE-ll1nd
      @INSANE-ll1nd 2 роки тому +3

      U got the point 👍

  • @amygdalatales8880
    @amygdalatales8880 Рік тому +2

    Skyscraper doesnt equate to development. Its just aesthetically pleasing.

  • @ishaanmathur8410
    @ishaanmathur8410 Рік тому +81

    According to me, there should be more skyscrapers in india because it will improve their accomodation and many people can live even in a square kilometer.

  • @akibff69yt
    @akibff69yt 2 роки тому +119

    Kitne country Hai Is Duniya Mein ... Lekin Map ... Mein ... Toh Humara ( INDIA ) Sabse Khubsurat Lagta Hai ... Proud To Be INDIAN 🥰💯❤

  • @imperial_Dragnix
    @imperial_Dragnix Місяць тому +1

    Skyscrapers are very important for India's devlopment , we are a agricultural based economy our fertile land is shrinking😢 , forest are being cut . No need of too much social life or sunlight , vertical devlopment is very important

  • @anupvadnere5950
    @anupvadnere5950 2 роки тому +28

    For metro city needed skyscrapers as horizontal distance also consume lots of land where we can use for urban plantation

  • @amritkarn5125
    @amritkarn5125 2 роки тому +221

    I think the FSI needs to be increased especially in unban areas to lower the accomodation charges and allow foreign influx of investment and people.

    • @Calmnessseeker
      @Calmnessseeker 2 роки тому +7

      Can't agree more 😭
      FSI must be Increased

    • @deusmachinima1189
      @deusmachinima1189 2 роки тому +5

      FSI should be increased to 10 or more minimum to have many skyscrapers like usa and china but highest fsi is in mumbai with only 5 fsi. Manhattan, Shanghai has 14 fsi or more. Most indian metropolitan fsi ranges from 1-3 highest being 4 and 5.

    • @pandurangarao6026
      @pandurangarao6026 2 роки тому +2

      Based necesasities are important...food, water, shelter...not sky srappers.

    • @HasanUnknown
      @HasanUnknown 2 роки тому

      [Quran 20:14]:-
      “Indeed, I am Allah, There is no God except Me, so worship Me and establish prayer for My remembrance.”

    • @amritkarn5125
      @amritkarn5125 2 роки тому +1

      @@pandurangarao6026 the reason for advocacy of increase in FSI is to make shelter more affordable without expansion of cities.
      Vertical sheltering will allow for more per capita shelter space and wider roads both of which will increase the foreign investment rates this giving more money to solve more problems

  • @shreyansh2244
    @shreyansh2244 Рік тому +5

    0:53 Correction- Architect only design, Actually Engineers build the Skyscraper.

  • @debojyotidas269
    @debojyotidas269 2 роки тому +15

    Skyscrapers has many benefits except social isolation which will not be a problem if we stay outside and meet with people and meet our neighbors who are in 40th floor with us. Skyscrapers also reduces real estate prices.

  • @shilpan9229
    @shilpan9229 2 роки тому +58

    Bro , Cross tower 🗼 in Seoul is in South Korea 🇰🇷 but you wrote China.
    Other information is really good ☺️ I love it and learnt also

  • @Doremon-12-06
    @Doremon-12-06 Рік тому +5

    Never need a skyscraper keep safe and clean like modern that's enough

  • @karthikaryan3109
    @karthikaryan3109 2 роки тому +14

    Correction at 0:41. Seoul City from South Korea. Not China. My Oppa's lives there. Sarange Oppa & Noona.

  • @dipendragahamagar2386
    @dipendragahamagar2386 2 роки тому +42

    Very informative as always in my opinion skyscraper should have in Indian to provide lavish shelter and and maintain population density 🙏❣️

    • @divyanshuprasad823
      @divyanshuprasad823 2 роки тому

      But they are expensive as compared to apartments or normal houses so they will just occupy land but can't be afforded by everyone and it will take years to build them as well as high maintenance cost will more electricity and water supply so I think building flats would be more sustainable way for Indian population and would be cost as well as time effective too.

  • @epicpunjabi1438
    @epicpunjabi1438 Рік тому +3

    india should have more skyscrapers than other countries it looks cool

  • @manoranjanbaskey
    @manoranjanbaskey 2 роки тому +110

    no matter we have skyscrappers or not, one who live in touch with Earth, live a healthy life...proud to be an Indian.

    • @vanshitog
      @vanshitog 2 роки тому +34

      *Logic left the chat

    • @vickybadwal9703
      @vickybadwal9703 2 роки тому +8

      @@vanshitog actually not he is right

    • @shreysethis5517
      @shreysethis5517 2 роки тому +6

      Har baat mein indian indian le atte hoe

    • @Dyson2024
      @Dyson2024 2 роки тому +13

      Ha touch me rho 😂 gandi nali me rho crore slum banate rho buliding nhi

    • @suchitkumarpandey7956
      @suchitkumarpandey7956 2 роки тому +1

      @@vanshitog oh yeah, someone is happy and satisfied but this MF can't digest that

  • @lakshay2634
    @lakshay2634 2 роки тому +44

    You showed European cities , It's really looking so aesthetic ❤️ I wish India ke bhi cities me aisi hi development ho

    • @radhajadhav7303
      @radhajadhav7303 2 роки тому

      Mumbai must do what nature does i e. have the same height as nature sets it. The tallest tree in Mumbai is the coconut tree and that is a maximum of 98 feet tall.
      The tallest building must not have more than 7 floors and the water tank on top.
      That will make the building 98 feet tall.
      Also the FSI must not be more than 1.
      Anything more than this has serious consequences.
      Apart from and more hazardous than the consequences mentioned in the video are the following ones:
      1. If a building is 9 or more floors tall then the only time the sunlight reaches the ground is when the sun rises above the building i.e. when it is overhead at noon. Even worse when 2 nine storeyed (9 floors) buildings are next to each other the sunlight penetration to the ground between these 2 buildings (leave alone 20, 30,40.....100 floors) is only when the sun is overhead for a brief period of time between these 2 buildings.
      This leads to a catastrophe called 'Sick Building Effect' (already a worldwide phenomenon).
      When the sunlight doesn't fall on the walls of the building or doesn't enter the homes or offices in the building, fungus grows not only on the walls outside and inside the homes or offices but also in the a/c ducts, shafts and other places i e. everywhere. This fungus harbours viruses and bacteria in a symbiotic relationship. This fungus, bacteria and virus gets suspended in the air along with moisture and causes deadly and/or chronic diseases including cancer, tuberculosis. and chronic respiratory disorders amongst others. The only way to get rid of this fungus is to plaster the walls newly only to have the fungus return in no time. Leave alone the a/c ducts/shafts.
      2. Also since there is no sunlight penetration on the ground including roads and footpaths to sanitize them there is fungal,bacterial and viral growth which cause diseases including cancer,tb, chronic respiratory disorders amongst others.
      Also since sunlight doesn't fall on human beings the vitamin D in their bodies doesn't get activated which leads to a variety of disorders including kidney failure.
      3. Also without sunlight the trees and plants on the road die. There is not a single tree on the roads of New York. Trees are half of our respiratory system. We breath in oxygen and give out carbon dioxide and the trees breath in that carbon dioxide and give out oxygen. Without trees humans will die.
      4. Now an FSI (Floor Space Index) of 1 means the ratio of total area of all floors built on the plot of land for people to live in to the area of the open space left on that plot of land is 1. That means the total floor area built and the open space area on that plot of land is the same. As the ratio of total floor area built to the open space area on that plot of land increases the number of people coming out not only on the open space on the plot but also on the road outside that building increases. The number of people using the basic amenities including roads, transportation (trains,buses,taxes,rickshas,cars and other vehicles), hospitals, clinics, schools and more increases which leads to stampedes and deaths as the one that occured at a railway station in Mumbai. This leads to shortage of expert doctors leading to death. This leads to traffic congestion and accidents and hence death.
      This leads to no parking space and hazardous levels of pollution/unit area and hence death.
      5. Buildings taller than 7floors and/or an FSI of more than 1 means the sun rises much later and sets much earlier and even during the day there is no daylight as there is no sunlight penetration.
      This leads to a higher usage of electricity for artificial lighting even during daytime leading to triple or quadruple electricity bills as compared to normal.
      In New York lights are turned on at 2 p m. in the afternoon. Sometimes lights are on all day long in NY.
      6. The problem that since Mumbai is an island it cannot grow horizontally is not a problem at all. Its an excuse by the politicians and builder nexus to build skyscrapers and coastal roads on expensive Mumbai land to make quick and huge money at the expense of destroying nature (and its beauty), sane living in and sane development of Mumbai.
      The island must be connected (seperated by the Ulhas river) to its surrounding cities that are NaviMumbai, Thane, Vasai-Virar by bridges across the river ( bridges already existing and Trans Harbour Link across Thane creek coming up) and further by roads (roads already existing) and metros to Kalyan-Dombivli, Panvel, Badlapur. Not by making insane coastal roads in the ocean destroying all the open spaces (beaches) and views (the sea,the horizon, the sky, the sunset) and the underwater flora and fauna (including planktons that light up the sea at night).
      Having the height of any building at a maximum of 98 feet and the FSI at a maximum of 1 is a must.

    • @gauravsharma_7
      @gauravsharma_7 Рік тому +1

      I don't like European cities, really concrete nothing else.
      I love Tokyo, which is a real city.

  • @anjitganav-cu7oi
    @anjitganav-cu7oi Рік тому +2

    " Why! India is undevelop " REASON (1) caste and
    religion problems (2) education problems (3) population problems (4) Nepotism Problems ... jab tak ye sabhi problems khatam nahi hoga tab tak India kabhi bhi devloped nahi hoga.🇮🇳

  • @eliocloud9740
    @eliocloud9740 2 роки тому +12

    I watched similar video on IBM and also really impressed by your work❤️

  • @realitycheckers8898
    @realitycheckers8898 2 роки тому +157

    I am following Guwrav's both channels since 1.5 years
    Such content quality and easy to understand videos are hard to find 😁

    • @SystemE33OR
      @SystemE33OR 2 роки тому +7

      Following since 1.5yrs still writing wrong name *GUWRAV*

    • @arnavsingh897
      @arnavsingh897 2 роки тому

      @@SystemE33OR lol

    • @avinashkumarsinha7888
      @avinashkumarsinha7888 2 роки тому

      I am following him since 5 years.. 😅
      He is amazing

    • @HasanUnknown
      @HasanUnknown 2 роки тому

      [Quran 20:14]:-
      “Indeed, I am Allah, There is no God except Me, so worship Me and establish prayer for My remembrance.”

    • @arnavsingh897
      @arnavsingh897 2 роки тому +5

      @@HasanUnknown and that's why I don't like your God 🙂

  • @altezzaandre9651
    @altezzaandre9651 Рік тому +13

    As a Jakarta love skyscraper, i think india needs skyscraper or high rise building 🤔

    • @phyoko3141
      @phyoko3141 Рік тому

      No need Skyscrapers, Like Europe city, Indonesian like skyscraper, The air is polluted. Never had fresh air.

    • @altezzaandre9651
      @altezzaandre9651 Рік тому

      ​@@phyoko3141really? the proof is now European countries have Skyscrapers project

  • @31.saurabhpayaghan71
    @31.saurabhpayaghan71 2 роки тому +26

    I'm also an architect. I'm your regular viewer. This information is really fantastic 👏 you cover all the facts, merits and demerits

  • @sampradasrivastava793
    @sampradasrivastava793 2 роки тому +87

    I personally think skyscrapers can be a great choice in India only for those cities which have more population and less land area as it can give more shelter to the people who are living there and for cities having more area don't really need to make skyscrapers

    • @car_of_thrones
      @car_of_thrones 2 роки тому

      Noida is the area where most of the skyscraper are being preparatiing but of upto 30th floor.. but they doesn't shine like these

    • @aviralrichhariya1550
      @aviralrichhariya1550 2 роки тому +7

      @@car_of_thrones because india sky scrappers are made of cement not glass

    • @kinglegend5574
      @kinglegend5574 Рік тому +1

      i think indian cities can never achieve aesthetic and beautiful house planning like europe let alone be the skyscrapers of western countries

    • @gauravsharma_7
      @gauravsharma_7 Рік тому +1

      ​@@aviralrichhariya1550Yeah! But these cement one are long lasting than Glass, but they look Ugly.
      Raat k time he Acche lagte hai.. Din j Time toh.. bas..

    • @NavneetKrSingh24
      @NavneetKrSingh24 Рік тому +1

      Skycrappers should be developed in those areas where official work and tourism exist extremely __
      UAE itself uses skycrappers majorly for Tourism👈

  • @Manpasand_Gyan
    @Manpasand_Gyan Рік тому +2

    ॐ नमः शिवाय 🇮🇳 दोस्तों

  • @Prakashtiwary_0007
    @Prakashtiwary_0007 2 роки тому +43

    Jai Hind 🇮🇳💓🙏🏻

  • @suvadipbarman8141
    @suvadipbarman8141 2 роки тому +12

    Actually I like skyscrapers but skyscrapers isn't the symbol of development. Personally I think we need skyscrapers in some cities like Mumbai, Hyderabad, Bangalore, Pune. But some old cities like Delhi, Kolkata, Lucknow, Chennai etc they doesn't need skyscrapers...

    • @relaxing__hub__.
      @relaxing__hub__. 2 роки тому

      Kolkata already had a number of skyscrapers tho

    • @blaze7177
      @blaze7177 Рік тому +2

      Skyscrapers *are* symbol of development.

  • @samueljames7204
    @samueljames7204 Рік тому +2

    @ 08:00 mins ... There is mis information or an error ..... How can a 40 floor building have 1600 flats .... That means each floor will have 40 flats ... Which is impossible.. 40*40=1600

  • @nandinisharma2634
    @nandinisharma2634 2 роки тому +38

    We did not want high rise buildings/apartments, we need devlopment with a view to save environment

    • @swathi6728
      @swathi6728 Рік тому +3

      Yes. Population control and eco-friendly development is essential for more of agro and forestry lands. If not then whole environment is in danger. Not only garbage disposal. People are not having civic sense for disposing biodegradable and non bio garbages separately despite being educated.
      Poor people are mostly conservative and superstitious.

    • @SnakeArtsOfficials
      @SnakeArtsOfficials Рік тому +3

      High building have more space but takes less land space so more trees parks agriculture etc will be on that land

    • @nandinisharma2634
      @nandinisharma2634 Рік тому

      @@SnakeArtsOfficials You are right, but I mean to say that we have to focus on both environment and development, but priority must be our environment

    • @gauravsharma_7
      @gauravsharma_7 Рік тому +3

      ​​@@nandinisharma2634Skycrappers also save environment,
      Harizontal Development leads expansion of the City due to which people have to travel alot and it becomes hell in cities like Delhi, Mumbai, Bangalore, Cheenai, which have Zero planning, conjusted Roads, less trees etc.
      Go and see Tokyo for once, Tokyo is really an Ideal city.
      Best Roads ✅
      Best Public Transport ✅
      Scrict laws for Green Area ✅
      Green area ✅
      Clean and disciplined city and its people ✅
      Low crime ✅
      And etc. Etc.
      No Indian City can match Tokyo's level even in next 1000 years if not taken city planning seriously.

    • @nandinisharma2634
      @nandinisharma2634 Рік тому

      @@gauravsharma_7 I agree but Skyscrapers looks very good in big cities and in the cities having small area as compared to population like Mumbai, but not in hilly terrains. I know it's very good for country's economy but hill terrains and some places with natural beauty looks fabulous without any skyscrapers. I know skyscrapers are good for business activities but people doesn't realise that the environment in which they are living where there is lack of sunlight on ground for people lack of trees and many more, however human beings are working to find a way to make skyscrapers a very good option for big cities.
      All the problems you mentioned can be short out by making a symmetrical arrangement of current buildings making them more efficient to work.

  • @Immortal10364
    @Immortal10364 2 роки тому +53

    Love from Maharashtra.
    Mumbai, Pune, Nagpur, Nashik, Aurangabad. Top cities😍😍
    Jai hind jai bharat 🇮🇳🇮🇳🇮🇳

  • @amodjp
    @amodjp Рік тому +3

    Indian needs more infrastructure in tier 2 and rural areas, second a skyscrapers maintenance costs and safety issues are also a concern

  • @user-j7y9wIl
    @user-j7y9wIl 2 роки тому +21

    In today's time there is not an issue to bring some product from the market from a skyscraper, in modern time there are all facilities in the skyscrapers inside, there are a little bit malls inside the skyscrapers, and to going out there are lifts there are elevators there are escalators which people can use to bring some morning products like Bread, milk, grocery or vegetables etc

    • @hriddhiman7529
      @hriddhiman7529 2 роки тому +1

      Exactly

    • @lifeislivinglove9073
      @lifeislivinglove9073 2 роки тому +1

      You can't live in Isolated state bro Indians love to go for shopping and enjoy Normal life with nature involment
      Think if we built such tall buildings there will be no pure air but just air conditioner in homes
      Every facility availability doesn't make any sense in reality it's imagination of every human being needs everything just so close from there house
      But using no windows for ventilation and natures walk would make human mind sick were are not ready for it till yet
      Earth would face more challenges regarding environmental issues and water scarcity due to high pollution and no rain 🤔 🤌

    • @RausanSinha
      @RausanSinha 2 роки тому +4

      @@lifeislivinglove9073 you have many stereotype for skyscraper. Do you think you can't exit from skyscraper for going friends? No one is putting you in jail 😂
      And in India housing needs is growing with population increases, people are building houses on agricultural land, which is waste of fertile land.
      We should consider building high rise and sky rise buildings.

    • @hriddhiman7529
      @hriddhiman7529 2 роки тому +1

      @@lifeislivinglove9073 You are mad bro

    • @hriddhiman7529
      @hriddhiman7529 2 роки тому +1

      @@lifeislivinglove9073 What ever you said is pure bulshit building skyscrapers is the best thing we can do😅

  • @Worldcitizen2000
    @Worldcitizen2000 2 роки тому +5

    No skyscrapers. Required : Better town planning,water ,sewage,waste & traffic management.Control on unchecked migration & illegal constructions & encroachment.More gardens & ponds . Cleaning of all rivers.less smoke ,carbon emission & green & clean energy.

  • @AG_Invincible
    @AG_Invincible Рік тому +3

    To be honest, i feel that Skyscrapers could be used only commercially as they have many certain limitations which limit the purpose of the residents

  • @rohitavhad2592
    @rohitavhad2592 2 роки тому +53

    India & dusre developing countries ko 'Developed' banne ke liye Skyscrapers ki nhi Proper Town/City Infrastructure & Infrastructural rules & regulations follow krnewale citizens ki zarurat hai

    • @devaroraa
      @devaroraa 2 роки тому +1

      India ko actually m skyscrapers ki zrurt h, here population density is so high so it can solve this issue

    • @RausanSinha
      @RausanSinha 2 роки тому +2

      @@devaroraa india ko hamesa se jarurat thi, par ye congress wale ki soch aage ki nhi.
      Town Planning naam ki cheez toh allmost every indian city me he hi nhi.
      USA, me chote chote sahar tak me Town planner appointment hote he ye dekhne k liye ki road kaha banwana hai or kaha nhi

    • @devaroraa
      @devaroraa 2 роки тому

      @@RausanSinha correct bro, China and India ek time p same level p the ab dekho vo kaha hum kaha

    • @DragonballExtreme_Editpro
      @DragonballExtreme_Editpro 2 роки тому

      Very good

    • @suhani2668
      @suhani2668 Рік тому

      @@devaroraa Well that do sound logical but from my experience here in my area, the city beside me is being developed from scratch with high rise buildings and few skyscrapers but the problem there is that people don't like to live in those flats cause they aren't on ground 🧍‍♀️ therefore half of the apartments are just empty now. And interestingly, the cities around it are densely populated cause of low rise buildings. So even if we make skyscrapers we do have to consider that whether people afford that? Do they fulfil their need as home?
      Cause of we talk about Mumbai, from what I heard, the house renting costs are much higher than a person's beginner salary

  • @pranavkumar106
    @pranavkumar106 2 роки тому +381

    Skyscrapers eventually would give us more open space which we could be use for widening of roads as over crowding and over traffick is a common problem in most of the places of Indian cities and towns. Narrowing cities to certain extent horizontally, we would get more space for agricultural, industrial, natural refreshment parks etc. etc. Our system & society must have to accustom with the need of the time to have a systematic city or town, for eg, to reach a stall if they can walk some distance horizontally, why not vertically. It seems without absorbing more and more people and activities by skyscrapers, Indian cities or towns will never be well arranged and we will eventually be in scarce of Agriculture, Forest and open lands and roads will always remain in chaotic state as at present. In fact India is doing a blunder by avoiding skyscrapers.

    • @radhajadhav7303
      @radhajadhav7303 2 роки тому +11

      Mumbai must do what nature does i e. have the same height as nature sets it. The tallest tree in Mumbai is the coconut tree and that is a maximum of 98 feet tall.
      The tallest building must not have more than 7 floors and the water tank on top.
      That will make the building 98 feet tall.
      Also the FSI must not be more than 1.
      Anything more than this has serious consequences.
      Apart from and more hazardous than the consequences mentioned in the video are the following ones:
      1. If a building is 9 or more floors tall then the only time the sunlight reaches the ground is when the sun rises above the building i.e. when it is overhead at noon. Even worse when 2 nine storeyed (9 floors) buildings are next to each other the sunlight penetration to the ground between these 2 buildings (leave alone 20, 30,40.....100 floors) is only when the sun is overhead for a brief period of time between these 2 buildings.
      This leads to a catastrophe called 'Sick Building Effect' (already a worldwide phenomenon).
      When the sunlight doesn't fall on the walls of the building or doesn't enter the homes or offices in the building, fungus grows not only on the walls outside and inside the homes or offices but also in the a/c ducts, shafts and other places i e. everywhere. This fungus harbours viruses and bacteria in a symbiotic relationship. This fungus, bacteria and virus gets suspended in the air along with moisture and causes deadly and/or chronic diseases including cancer, tuberculosis. and chronic respiratory disorders amongst others. The only way to get rid of this fungus is to plaster the walls newly only to have the fungus return in no time. Leave alone the a/c ducts/shafts.
      2. Also since there is no sunlight penetration on the ground including roads and footpaths to sanitize them there is fungal,bacterial and viral growth which cause diseases including cancer,tb, chronic respiratory disorders amongst others.
      Also since sunlight doesn't fall on human beings the vitamin D in their bodies doesn't get activated which leads to a variety of disorders including kidney failure.
      3. Also without sunlight the trees and plants on the road die. There is not a single tree on the roads of New York. Trees are half of our respiratory system. We breath in oxygen and give out carbon dioxide and the trees breath in that carbon dioxide and give out oxygen. Without trees humans will die.
      4. Now an FSI (Floor Space Index) of 1 means the ratio of total area of all floors built on the plot of land for people to live in to the area of the open space left on that plot of land is 1. That means the total floor area built and the open space area on that plot of land is the same. As the ratio of total floor area built to the open space area on that plot of land increases the number of people coming out not only on the open space on the plot but also on the road outside that building increases. The number of people using the basic amenities including roads, transportation (trains,buses,taxes,rickshas,cars and other vehicles), hospitals, clinics, schools and more increases which leads to stampedes and deaths as the one that occured at a railway station in Mumbai. This leads to shortage of expert doctors leading to death. This leads to traffic congestion and accidents and hence death.
      This leads to no parking space and hazardous levels of pollution/unit area and hence death.
      5. Buildings taller than 7floors and/or an FSI of more than 1 means the sun rises much later and sets much earlier and even during the day there is no daylight as there is no sunlight penetration.
      This leads to a higher usage of electricity for artificial lighting even during daytime leading to triple or quadruple electricity bills as compared to normal.
      In New York lights are turned on at 2 p m. in the afternoon. Sometimes lights are on all day long in NY.
      6. The problem that since Mumbai is an island it cannot grow horizontally is not a problem at all. Its an excuse by the politicians and builder nexus to build skyscrapers and coastal roads on expensive Mumbai land to make quick and huge money at the expense of destroying nature (and its beauty), sane living in and sane development of Mumbai.
      The island must be connected (seperated by the Ulhas river) to its surrounding cities that are NaviMumbai, Thane, Vasai-Virar by bridges across the river ( bridges already existing and Trans Harbour Link across Thane creek coming up) and further by roads (roads already existing) and metros to Kalyan-Dombivli, Panvel, Badlapur. Not by making insane coastal roads in the ocean destroying all the open spaces (beaches) and views (the sea,the horizon, the sky, the sunset) and the underwater flora and fauna (including planktons that light up the sea at night).
      Having the height of any building at a maximum of 98 feet and the FSI at a maximum of 1 is a must.

    • @pranavkumar106
      @pranavkumar106 2 роки тому +19

      @@radhajadhav7303 We always find enormous explanations for the things we legging behind.

    • @rohtmallannavar9940
      @rohtmallannavar9940 Рік тому

      Guzarish hai usko bhi eek se sikhata hai lekin tere se sikhata se ho gaya h na hogull se Activity ke liye hi hai usko thodina jala

    • @santoshbawankar7058
      @santoshbawankar7058 Рік тому

      Bhaiya/didi stand laga lo
      This free service will get extinct if no traffic😐

    • @hdrutvik2863
      @hdrutvik2863 Рік тому +2

      I agree bro ..... If we build vertically then we can give more space or a part for only forest things

  • @allthatisroyaltyfreemusice6012

    4:58 sponsorship ad ends. Thank me later

  • @Sanatani_Sherni
    @Sanatani_Sherni 2 роки тому +6

    🔴Fun Fact:
    _Indian Foreign Minister Dr. S Jaishankar🇮🇳 Has More years of experience than the Age of 🇵🇰Pakistani Foreign Minister Bilawal Bhutto_

  • @shivamdas3959
    @shivamdas3959 Рік тому +1

    We need skyscrapers in our India.

  • @sid7357
    @sid7357 2 роки тому +7

    In my opinion, sky scrapers are essential but what is we convert sky scrapers to commercial !? Means for offices hotels etc for earning and will also help growing gdp it will help our country a lot .

  • @soham9725
    @soham9725 2 роки тому +42

    Your list is not updated
    Mumbai alone has 208 skyscrapers (150m+)
    And more than 70 skyscrapers (200m+)
    And more than 250 skyscrapers under construction which are all expected to complete by 2026
    Which means mumbai alone will have 500 skyscrapers (150m+) by 2026
    Each of this information is from WIKIPEDIA.....
    One more thing mumbai comes in the list of top 5 cities with the most skyscrapers in the world.....

  • @YTMRCODER
    @YTMRCODER Рік тому +10

    0:32 Wrong information! India has 250+ skyscrapers

  • @AIRinJEEADVANCED2025FPOTEN
    @AIRinJEEADVANCED2025FPOTEN 2 роки тому +7

    Thanks Gaurav bhai for considering Pune city

  • @ashmitonline
    @ashmitonline 2 роки тому +8

    1:25 I live in pune and pune has been developed soooo much like there is nothing bad

  • @beautyyadav3617
    @beautyyadav3617 Рік тому +1

    Just organize the country well and give a strong structure to our country 😊

  • @ayeshaclassesgk
    @ayeshaclassesgk 2 роки тому +28

    Gaurav ji❤️I'm glad that all of your subscribers helped you and supported you on your journey.

    • @rajputanafire
      @rajputanafire 2 роки тому +1

      I'm biggest fan gourav bhai channel

    • @rajputanafire
      @rajputanafire 2 роки тому

      I'm subscribe you mam

    • @xdbarun
      @xdbarun 2 роки тому

      @@rajputanafire bhai ye ye r@ndi h har kisi ke har video pe comment krta h abhi 2 min pehle samar experiment pe iska comment dekha tha

    • @rajputanafire
      @rajputanafire 2 роки тому +1

      @@xdbarun okk bro I'm unsubscribe this

  • @mba056-lokeshwaran.k2
    @mba056-lokeshwaran.k2 2 роки тому +12

    Despite Cities like Paris London Berlin Copenhagen have low raised building they still look magnificent...
    We must focus on making beautiful building rather than big ☺️like Pairs

    • @asterionop8447
      @asterionop8447 2 роки тому +5

      haan haan dusro ko hi blindly follow karte raho 😂
      the countries you've mentioned are low in population and population growth rate , while both are extremely high in India
      when the population is already so large and growing so fast more houses will be required and if we don't build skyscrapers then we would have to build many many new small houses horizontally for the growing population
      but , doing so will cover up the fertile land where farming is done (no one is going to build houses on a mountain or desert lol)
      and then finally we won't have food for the huge population 🙏🙂
      we need more and more agricultural land for the huge population of ours (even one child policy can't bring balance soon)
      and for that we need vertically tall buildings to accommodate the growing population at the same time
      OK?

  • @LotusasivGaming
    @LotusasivGaming 8 місяців тому

    8:47 one solution to the electricity is solar Panels & For water we can make Green rooftops like Japan did

  • @Hitu17
    @Hitu17 2 роки тому +5

    Skyscrapers are necessary only in cities which contains a lot of population which leads to traffic . Areas where populaton is less should be developed in services rather than the infrastructure which can spoil fertile land too....

  • @yashsoniji
    @yashsoniji 2 роки тому +7

    I think we don't need to made skysleeper. Indian old architecture was so awesome we should focus on that

  • @blacktube5696
    @blacktube5696 Рік тому +1

    My opinion was, In India was not come in race of build skyscrapers because the high consumption of water and electricity,power,etc. So we Indians are happy with the small buildings that is enoug and independently.😀

  • @gamingadda8936
    @gamingadda8936 2 роки тому +11

    Indian culture and dhrma 🙇❤️

    • @Pinkili
      @Pinkili 9 місяців тому

      Bruh. F you culture

  • @udhaysharma4417
    @udhaysharma4417 2 роки тому +22

    I love my India❤❤

  • @ranjanbauri440
    @ranjanbauri440 Рік тому +1

    Whatever we have ,we are best.

  • @varaxara8917
    @varaxara8917 2 роки тому +8

    Not soul it's Seoul 😁😂🤣
    Not in China, it's in Korea 😁😂🤣

  • @artcraftwithshrujalatj8787
    @artcraftwithshrujalatj8787 Рік тому +4

    One small correction Seoul city is not in China it is in South Korea 😅

  • @Nitin...09
    @Nitin...09 2 роки тому +29

    Proud To Be Indian 🇮🇳

  • @Smart_Soham
    @Smart_Soham Рік тому +1

    Skyscrapers us very much needed in India:
    (1) India is a country with 1.4 billions people, so people are building their houses in agricultural land where we produce crops. so, Skyscrapers can solve this problem
    (2) if Skyscrapers are built we can have more land building future projects and technologies with industries
    (3) if Skyscrapers are built more tourist will come to see indua from where we can income revenues
    (4) Skyscrapers can also solve the traffic problem, because of houses are very close to each other, we can't build much more roads which creates a lot of traffic problem
    (5) if we build Skyscrapers then it will create a society in Skyscrapers which will unite Indians and besides farmers will get more land for farming
    Country like Dubai has lots of Skyscrapers which is not needed but a densed populous India has no Skyscrapers
    Shame for that

  • @umakantshah896
    @umakantshah896 2 роки тому +6

    We Nepali are very lucky.
    We are getting electricity 24 hours in a day.
    The price of 1 unit electricity in our country is only Rs 3 INR.

  • @factroz3
    @factroz3 2 роки тому +6

    11:34 Althogh sky scrapers are not sign of advancement but india should be redesigned and should give a better look 😀👍

  • @kaushikiparida7614
    @kaushikiparida7614 Рік тому

    Grounded grounded grounded....
    I'm personally a nature loving person...
    And i love free nd fresh air....
    If I wish to go on top and see the city...
    I'll simply climb a mountain... It's more productive than this...

  • @yashtambe1933
    @yashtambe1933 2 роки тому +6

    0:38 Sir Cross Tower is not Located in China
    It's in South Korea
    ☺️

    • @adamsmith4177
      @adamsmith4177 2 роки тому

      Video ko Aakhir Tak dekh lete to Achcha Hota

    • @yashtambe1933
      @yashtambe1933 2 роки тому

      @@adamsmith4177 Dekha hai bhai

  • @dhrubshorts6547
    @dhrubshorts6547 2 роки тому +5

    Skyscraper nhi chaiye sir 🙂
    Environment bhi zaruri ha... ♥️
    Itni skyscraper kadi karke kya fayada jab roshni bhi nhi ayega ped bhi Bada nhi hoga

  • @ashutoshvishwakarma8640
    @ashutoshvishwakarma8640 Рік тому +1

    Skyscraper are made up of glass and glass causes greenhouse heating and in India temp reaches 40 in summer skyscraper is linke oven in India

  • @StayHealthy363
    @StayHealthy363 2 роки тому +5

    Hate to admit that China's skyscraper and infrastructure looks really good and futuristic.

    • @icecream1030
      @icecream1030 Рік тому

      Absolutely right but their people worked hard too for it.

    • @The_emperor905
      @The_emperor905 Рік тому

      You need to see the other side of their cities too😂.

  • @hinduwarrior123
    @hinduwarrior123 Рік тому +11

    Awesome information!
    I hate skyscrapers, since I love nature and love socially active societies!

  • @sukhmanpreetsingh07
    @sukhmanpreetsingh07 Рік тому +1

    I think there should be skyscrapers in India . This will also boost economy as India will develop its roads ,infra ,parks, so tourism will attract.

  • @Shivam___yt
    @Shivam___yt 2 роки тому +9

    Kuch bhi ho Mera Bharat Mahan 🇮🇳🇮🇳🇮🇳♥️

  • @sushantmeshram5172
    @sushantmeshram5172 2 роки тому +4

    You have such great voice and style of speaking that you can convince anyone over any issue!!

  • @X_FLAME_FF
    @X_FLAME_FF Місяць тому

    Best youtubers... Gaurav thakur, nitish rajput, mohak mangal.. 😮‍💨

  • @ErxgonIITK
    @ErxgonIITK Рік тому +9

    The fact that India needs skyscrapers the most.

  • @sksavankarosiya8001
    @sksavankarosiya8001 2 роки тому +7

    Mujhe to lagta hai ki India ko europe jaise sundar architectures and building banane chahiye, kyuki mujhe woh dekhne me bohot beautiful and classic lgte hai 👍🏻

    • @Dhruv-Kumar
      @Dhruv-Kumar 2 роки тому +5

      Sahi kaha aur Ayodhya, Varanasi, Himalayas me strictly skyscrapper ban ki jarrorat ha

    • @Dhruv-Kumar
      @Dhruv-Kumar 2 роки тому +5

      Skyscrapper is not our culture

    • @anurag6818
      @anurag6818 2 роки тому +3

      @@Dhruv-Kumar bhakt spotted opinion rejected

    • @akashchowdhury8922
      @akashchowdhury8922 2 роки тому +2

      Correct bro ..i like Europe and their infrastructure so much

    • @DM-zb8hw
      @DM-zb8hw 2 роки тому

      @@anurag6818 DhruvPoti ka ch0dh@?

  • @ankurverma8792
    @ankurverma8792 Рік тому +1

    India 🇮🇳

  • @rajeshkawatra6262
    @rajeshkawatra6262 2 роки тому +7

    City area should be limited. As & when it starts getting bigger, sky scrapers living be adopted with considerations of other civic amenities like broad roads, sewage pipelines, public transportation, housing for domestic helps in each society, uninterrupted power supply supported with solar power, market complexes to cater for population and many other human requirements. The sky scrapers are good to have more greenery around but it should be planned in that way. In India another problem is there that politicians don't oppose street howkers who set up their stall & huts at any vacant place, road sides & parks by greasing palms of govt law enforcing authorities with some a NGOs standing with unlawful elements defying laws.