Still behind Germany, United Kingdom France and Italy isn't that great - especially that behind Italy part has to burn. Numbers look even worse per capita. Though maybe he's got diffrent numbers? There is a small point here that Russia didn't suffer as much as expected and especially Germany is looking at quite the recession.
Even that is incorrect as Germany, UK and France - AT LEAST - out pacing russia in economy, with other metrics even showing such countries as Italy, Holand and Spain ahead of russia in the most important economic factors.
@@STzim russia is suffering BEYOND what it claims - russia cooks the books - while Germany always has plans for recessions, in factvriding it out is part of the plan as in economy often the path of least resistance can bring better results. Recessions are an inevitability of capitalism and often comes as a plate cleance for the accumukation of economic malpractices caused by neoliberalism. Things only get worse if the neoliberals try to keep everything as it was, basically trying to fit a square in a circle.
To be fair to putin, he talked about purchasing power parity. In that it's just behind germany, according to the imf, so number two in europe. PPP doesn't mean much though when you're talking about absolute economic "power". It just means if it wasn't a shithole (which it is) it would be doing about as well as germany (with almost twice the population). So not really a flex lol.
I'm Polish and I had no idea it was all my fault. I'm so sorry, big apologies to every fascist and communist regime which helped my country so much in the past.
You are very welcome, from a German. Still happy that you guys have twice as many tanks as us soon. Please stop at the french border if you have to use them, we dont want to get nuked.
You should! It happened nearly a decade ago, and you likely didn't live back then, but it is nearly 100% entirely your and your nations fault. Like all the other N@zis who forced Germany to counterinvade you, along with a few other countries while they were at it (as you do, France probably border Poland and would likely also have invaded Germany). I bet you dislike Jar Jar Binks too, you monster.
@@jvcyt298 I thought it was a reference to Time Cube which was a brilliantly deranged website "explaining" the nature of time, creation, the universe, the Bible, etc. An internet meme from the days before we called them internet memes.
Carlson: “I’m sorry, but what does having 4 men impersonating the heir to czar to the Russian throne in the early 1600’s [true story] have to do with your justification of invading Ukraine?” Putin: “We get there when we get there!”
"I am a Christian, which is why I follow the doctrine of always holding every grudge for thousands of years and making sure never to turn the other cheek!" - Vladimir Putin
In Poland, the situation was even more reverse. It was not forced to join NATO, but rather it forced NATO to accept Poland as a member via clever diplomacy exploiting American political rivalries
The idea that NATO can involuntarily force membership is always so laughable. Exactly what advantage do they think NATO could possibly gain from forcing a small country to join their mutual defense organization?
@@85isaboat53no one joined NATO out of fear the US would invade them. Infact, the entire former Warsaw packed was practically banging done the door to NATO’s office as soon as they were freed from Russia’s communism. And they were smart for that, because if they hadn’t, they would probably be like what Ukraine is now. Being invaded by the Russians.
@@oleksandrbespalov9713nato by definition can’t expand its borders because countries must volunteer to join nato and then ontop of that fact they must meet prerequisite requirements to be allowed within the organization upon application. The very existence of the application process ontop the debates that happen around the process of joining make the entire argument of nato expansion moot.
@@oleksandrbespalov9713 Nato can't expand in the way most people think of when they hear expansion. The only way they can expand is by having other countries join them willingly, and have all of the current countries in Nato agree to let them in. A country can't be forcefully brought into the alliance, because then such an alliance wouldn't work. tl;dr, Putins entire argument for Nato expansion doesn't work because these countries and their people are making the choice to willingly join Nato
I don't know guys why you keep talking about nato. My joke was about the universe expansion towards the East. And also I'm aware that the universe doesn't have any East. Yeah, now I'm explaining my jokes. Who have I become, oh god, oh god.
Tucker: "Why'd you invade Ukraine?" Putin: "Long before time had a name, Ninjago was created by the First Spinjitzu Master, using the Four Weapons of Spinjitzu. The Scythe of Quakes, the Nunchucks of Lightning, the Shurikens of Ice and the Sword of Fire. Weapons so powerful, no one can handle all of their power at once! When he passed away, his two sons swore to protect them, but the oldest was consumed by darkness and wanted to possess them. A battle between brothers broke out, and the oldest was struck down and banished to the Underworld. Peace returned, and the younger brother hid the weapons, but knowing his older brother's relentless ambition for power, he placed a guardian to protect them. And for fear of his own demise, a map for an honest man to hide. That honest man was your father. The older brother is Lord Garmadon, and I... need to find those weapons before he does"
Every word Putin spoke was true. The west has big plans for Ukraine THESE ARE THEIR WORDS. 1, They plan to shut down farming in Europe making it the crime of ECOCIDE punishment jail move it all to Ukraine. 2, Shitstain 🇬🇧 has spent big in Odesaa and the coast hoping Ukraine would build cheap warships. 3, Israelistan owns 30% of the land in Ukraine Black Rock and Vanguard planned to buy 100%. 4, Israelistan owns almost every major business in Ukraine just as they own Australian businesses. 5, Ukraine is losing the war its Military decimated. Redacted in the US announced Israelistan 🇺🇲 has ordered ZZelinsky to replace its entire government with western educated people who are LOYAL TO AMERICA this accounts for General Zalhuznyi a UkroNazi his replacement more acceptable to RUSSIA and the WEST. 6, The ploy to take Ukraine and the southern ports failed tbey thought they could fill it with war ships and block Russia's warm water ports. 7, The west thought creating a UkroNazi state yes there is film of an American Nazi explaining how the CIA used US Nazis to create AZOV Shitstain 🇬🇧 created right sector 1 and 2 using UK Nazis other groups KRAKEN etc exist they were handed territories where they ruled like medieval Barons. The war to collapse Russia failed Europe and Israelistan are bled dry of weapons cash and raw materials they hoped to steal via the total collapse of Ukraine and Russia have evaporated theyre broke. And now Africa has cut them off by stopping the looting of resources paying pennies on the dollar. China has stepped in providing massive infrastructure development at low cost instead of the IMF giving loans for mining etc where they set the price they pay. Israelistan or Firestone had a 100 year contract from 1926 where they paid Niger 6 cents per acre for 4 million acres 2,4 million per year. Ukraine is not a democracy all political parties are banned some leaders jailed. There is no free press reporters comply or face execution in the streets. Pablo Lira a US journalist was recently tortured there eventually dieing with no aid from Israelistan. Ukraine has committed thousands of war crines Germany led a commission to investigate Russian war crimes they got 300 all against the Ukraine Military. They have cut up the bodies of wounded UKR and Russian soldiers to sell the parts to Europe run by a female doctor from the Netherlands. They have fired on their own wounded trying to surrender ON FILM in fact the film of UKRONAZIS execution and torture of Russian soldiers was done on the orders of ZZelinsky himself. He also passed an order that anyone refusing to fight can be executed on the spot there is plenty of UKR film of that happening Poland complained when their Mercs were executed for refusing a suicide mission. The only question left given the desperate situation of the population who are being grabbed off the streets and sent to the front is how long before they take out ZZelinsky his own troops are already threatening him.
Of course it was us the Poles who caused World War II, we refused to see how Mr. Chamberlain's approach was working perfectly and how well Czechoslovakia did for itself.
ehhh. Let's remember the position Chamberlain was in. Britain needed time to re-arm. *Something* had to be sacrificed. I'm not saying it was good, or right, but I'm not sure what other options Britain had, particularly when the French were so dead-set against moving against Germany.
@@RaptorJesusand yet it was the Germans who took the most advantage of that time to rearm, allowing for their initial victories. The British and French on appear had better armies but were unwilling to use them when they could’ve landed a devastating blow against the Germans in 1939 or even earlier. Instead the British ended up skiing much if their gear and France and had to rebuild in sort through lend lease.
@@RaptorJesus I´ve heard this cope a thousand times and it is simply not true. Chamberlain was not preparing for war, he wanted to avoid it, I don´t blame him, I am sure most of British public wanted as well, but he was just too naive to trust a word from a dictator. Giving a potential enemy up to 3 milion new subjects and criple an ally that would have taken the first strike, not to mention industrial capacity for war and weapons stocks that Germans will invavitably take over when they decide to roll into what was left of CS is something you don´t do if you want to "re-arm" faster than your enemy. Wehrmacht in 38 was a lot weaker than in 39, so was Hitler political position. And to blame France for this is simply not fair when it was mainly Chamberlain who was super pro-active in this regard. I have no problem if you defend his character as someone who just wanted to avoid WW1 scenario but don´t make his biggest L into some 200 IQ chess move, watch his arrival into Britain with the piece of paper signed by Hitler and tell me if he looks like somebody who "sacrificed something to buy time". Please just stop this narative, even if you are British, this does not make UK look better, it makes it look worse.
Let’s be honest. If France, Britain and Poland together has said a firm NO at München, as well as asked counties like Yugoslavia, Romania Bulgaria etc to back them up? Then Hitler likely would have backed down from that coalition, or been soundly beaten. But, in Britain and France did not have the public supper, and the others would not act alone
@@baneofbanes This is true, but there was simply no public support in either nation for action against Germany. It would've been political suicide, likely resulting in serious discontent. I don't even know if the French military would've obeyed the order.
I believe the Romans called this "Defensive Invasions", a term invented to mock the rhetoric in the senate where no matter what, every time Rome went to war it was somehow "Defensive" even if they started things first it was always to "Protect Rome" and therefore justified.
@@alexsharp9813 For all you know the person you're talking to does live next to them, or could be a NATO soldier who had to fight Russia in the Cold War and deal with their propaganda.
@@TriphexCorporation for all you know my friend - I am Ukrainian soldier fighting since march 2022 🙃 listen carefully to what the man says in this video :)
And now I want to see an Italian politician claiming that Italy should rule France or Britain because the Roman Empire was there 2000 years ago. That's the level of putler's pseudo-historical bullshit.
Someone could use Putin's case here to say that Crimea actually belongs to the Greeks with their roughly two-and-a-half-millennium older claim to the territory. (History can be gamed *so hard*.)
That's the problem with going up to an egotistical totalitarian maniac and telling him "YOU SUCK, YOU'RE EVIL... Wait why aren't you granting my requests for an interview?" Like so many journalists and politicians are too invested in virtue signaling instead of reporting or diplomacy. Sometimes you need to bite your tongue in order to get to the bottom of things. You can't just run in like a screaming banshee and expect to get the same results as someone who tries to be a bit more tactful. (It certainly doesn't help that journalists that are tactful are attacked and labeled as being traitors because they don't start an argument mid-interview and get kicked out for unruly behavior as a sign of protest... Or maybe it's to eliminate and discredit competition?) Reminds me of one short I saw about an overweight computer guy talking about "we already have a journalist in Russia!" (And he goes into how he's imprisoned, not at all why he was.) Really, we already have a journalist? (A WSJ hired one nonetheless.) ONE journalist? And we can only have one journalist per country? Come on man, that's cope. I don't care if Tucker wants to suck Putin's toes. I want to hear the lies Putin has to say. I don't want some dressed up personality telling me that "it's too dangerous for you to hear, it might corrupt your mind and turn you alt-right!!!" I think they're afraid of people creating their independent thoughts and narratives. Even if it already aligns with their narrative, they don't like the precedent it sets. Could spell disaster in the long run. Especially since it incentivizes people to look at other news sources because the mainstream ones already blew their shot. Being careless and pandery.
Some credit? He actually went up there like a journalist and interviewed Putin. He didn't intentionally antagonize Putin as a form of virtuous protest so that the opinionated people know who to side with and what news sources to "trust" as a circlejerk. Because midwits hate having to think up their own thoughts. Because the mainstream is in the business of propagandizing, there is an actual demand for real unfiltered news. Tucker saw that demand, and whatever his biases may be, took advantage of it. And I will have to say, I'm loving this return to more "traditional" journalism.
*Takes a tablet, starts playback of "history of the entire world, i guess" where the reson for literally everything had been replaced by -DA JOOS- DA POLES
@@theamericanpotatonamedphil4306In the beginning, there was no cube. And God said, "Let there be Russians," and there were Russians. And God turned to look at something, turned back and there was THE CUBE
I honestly can’t blame TC for this interview. Especially after the fact. Look at his face after putin said Poland started WWII. Then every 10 minutes for the first half of the interview. Tucker always rolls out a “how is this relevant?” or “So you’ve been president for 20 years, why bring this up now?”
I absolutely can. That dude is a twat-waffle supreme with extra shit sauce. He sat there and just let the guy walk on his face... but I guess that's par for the course for an ex-Fox "news" person... they let Orange Dumbass walk on their face all the time.
Exactly. Everyone is trying to insult Tucker for this interview but he’s literally just asking some basic questions and Putin is attempting rewrite history but Tucker is clearly not believing any of it, he’s clearly baffled at how Putin thinks he’s telling accurate information.
Gurring? You mean Göring? Hermann "We love 'muh aryans' so much we'll start a war that'll forever-sleep millions of aryans" Göring? Yeah I can see the resemblance between him and Valdimir "we love slavs so much we'll start a war that'll forever-sleep thousands (at the very least) of slavs" Putin. Eerily similar.
@@RaptorTroll360 He as i said was KGB they already did. He was part of that.. Be careful with that name.. Youtuube/FB ban people for certain names. i just came off one.. for using the German part name at the time. Apparently history is now "hate"
About the Bismarck Quote: I searched roughly 1 hour in different german archivs and the library of my universtity for "bismarck" and "potential", and couldnt find anything. Also, just a personal observation: The word potential, or potenzial in german, sounds pretty off for the time period, and for Bismarck as well.
It's a paraphrase but otherwise correct. It was a common theme with Bismarck that the external perceptions of your country are guided by its potential to undertake warfare, actual or economic. The section from the interview is: "The West is afraid of a strong China more than it fears a strong Russia because Russia has 150 million people, and China has a 1.5 billion population, and its economy is growing by leaps and bounds -- over five percent a year, it used to be even more. But that's enough for China. As Bismark once put it, potentials are most important." When questioned over his "Blood and Iron" speech, Bismarcks response was : "The importance of a state is measured by the number of soldiers it can put into the field of battle" Bismarcks speech to the Reichstag in 1888 again emphasizes dictating the attitudes of others (most importantly the French) through the increased potential of a unified Germany: "We must, to put it briefly, be as strong in these times as we can possibly be, and we can be stronger than any other nation of equal numbers in the world...if we do not need our full armed strength, we need not summon it. ... By nature we are rather tending away, the one from the other. But the Franco-Russian press within which we are squeezed compels us to hold together, and by pressure our cohesive force is greatly increased. ... But we must respond to the intentions of providence by making ourselves so strong that the pikes can do nothing but encourage us." All of this is about unifying Germany to increase its potential.
@@worldoftancraft you mean like this from Бисмарк и Россия. 1851-1871 гг: Despite the Crimean tragedy, Bismarck considered Russia's position in international relations to be solid, only slightly weakened by the articles of the Paris Peace Treaty, and noted the great domestic and international potential of the state. or in Russian: Несмотря на Крымскую трагедию, Бисмарк считал положение России в международных отношениях прочным, лишь несколько ослабленным статьями Парижского мирного договора, и отмечал большой внутренний и международный потенциал государства (there are other examples ) As I said, it was a fairly common theme with Bismarck :-)
So Putin is a Hitler/Nazi apologist, who also ignored that Russia joined Nazi Germany in invading and dividing Poland, then goes on to equate himself to Adolf Hitler, after 2 years calling for a witch-hunt for Nazis, all the while employing people who are unabashedly Nazi sympathizers going so far as to have a Swatstika as a the logo of the Zimargl subunit of Rusich Group. Sometimes I wonder if the greatest threat to humanity is ultimately a lack of self-awareness and an over abundance of hypocrisy. Bunker Grandpa here is a good example, if the end ever comes our history is going to read like a morbid comedy.
Indeed, rumors about putler being a huge fan of H were going around since quite a few month. With this interview, he candidly confirmed he is an actual neo-N
As a German studying history with a focus in prussian history, I think, that i know the potential source for that Bismarck quote. I think it is from a personal correspondence regarding the difference in industrial potential between the north German confederation and the austrian alined German states before the austro-prussian war in 1866. But they have only the sleightest resemblance. In that letter at least, Bismarck did not say the sentence, that Putin quotes. He either got a terrible translation of the correspondence or just straight up Made that quote up and attributed it to Bismarck to give it more weight. P.S.: Sorry for the english mistakes.
Putin comparing himself to Hitler is just hilarious. Poland started WWII just like Ukraine started Putin's invasion of Ukraine. Putin does came across as a whiny wokest.
Actually the Jews declared war on Germany in 34. Headlines of Jewish/Zionist papers said “Jews of the world declare war on Germany” at the time. Little known fact. Obviously Poland was and still is Zionist controlled but technically it was the Jews who wanted the war first.
Putin IS a whiny woke lefty. He is a Communist after all. He loves the USSR and Stalin. He is passive-aggressive. His goal is power for the sake of power, not righteousness. He uses masochistic tendencies and plays the victim. That is the definition of Leftism according to Industrial Society and Its Future. Leftists are highly neurotic.
I mean... Stalin found out about the German plan to invade in May, 3 months before it would happen, thanks to a Soviet soy working in Berlin. At that point he was faced with a choice: let Germany take some of Poland, or all of it. Which would you have chosen?
@@LancesArmorStriking You didn't need spies to know in 1939 there will be war. Draft in Poland started in April and was only delayed on request of France and Great Britain. And by your logic any war is opportinity to take teritories of your neighbour. Poland has to invade now Ukrainine just because Russia invaded Ukraine, and Ukraine can lose? It's pure absurd. Russia had no right to invade Poland in 1939 and is as much responsible for II world war as Nazis. And Russia even made a deal with Nazis (Ribbentrop - Molotov pact together with secret protocols). To justify such a atrocity is simply to have no decency.
@@LancesArmorStriking No? Because Stalin didn't make the deal. Ribbentrop had reccommended Stalin to Hitler early May to subvert the British-Polish pact and Hitler initiated negotiations to which Stalin had no problems with. Seeing as how the Germans signed the Munich agreement because they didn't have supplies, Stalin should've sided with the Allies. It's a miracle the Germans even got far as to Poland from how under prepared they were. Between actively supplying the guy that wants to literally exterminate or enslave everyone of your race and culture and your market rivals. I think a peice of Poland wasn't worth being alienated from the Allies for the rest of history.
also they really like russia for some reason, which is really contrary to those they pretend to look up to. i guess money is more important than ideals to them.
@@bosermann4963 that one is more on the money, but still none of those compare, Ukrainians have suffered under Russia for 100's of years, and have had their culture and language be attacked multiple times as Russia tried to erase it, Ukranians have faced ethnic cleansing campaigns such as forced deportations and the holodomor (which btw Ukranians had a big enough harvest to feed it's people and most of the starving soviet citizens but the soviet government confiscated the food as they had agreements to sell the foodstuffs to other nations and they didn't give one fuck about the fact that the failed harvest in Russia proper meant there was not enough for domestic needs which resultet in a famine in most of the USSR which hit Ukrainians especially hard as most of their production was for the international market)
I looked up the full Russian transcript of the interview to find the Otto Von Bismarck quote. I thought perhaps the translator didn’t give us the true English version of the quote. So here it is in Russian. Как однажды сказал Бисмарк, потенциалы являются наиболее важными. So in Russian Putin did not directly quote Bismarck. No quotation marks. So it is an alleged summary of something he said. I tried googling Bismarck and this phrase in Russian. No hits. So I couldn’t find what Putin is quoting in Russian.
The idea that Tucker is actually some huge Russia simp or particularly looks up to Putin i think is laughable. It's simply a cheap smear to try and dismiss him. This type of attack just feeds the populist backlash he type of people that maybe attracted to him as a form of defiance if nothing else.
@@robertharrington703well getting a big and controversial interview in itself would obviously help his brand and exposure. Thats a "material interest'.
Putin: "NATO expand eastwards!" Also Putin: expand westwards Also also Putin: scares new countries to join NATO Me: are Putin paid by NATO to ruin Russia!?
I guess some people will confuse Putin's stupid instinct on how to behave as for him being smart, but actually it is more like his primitive instinct about dominance
Given that RU has not released any evidence about their economy past two years except "Trust me bro, I'm fine" the 11th place in world chart might be as well 11th place in EU chart. And Russia is not entirely Europe, it's half Asia.
I saw the first 5 second intro and my hands are already moving towards my emotional support vodka, turns out it's the right call. How much liver damage have done for you to listen the whole thing, multiple times?
@@yaki_ebiko We desperately need someone to add "Incoming!" line they put into every WW2 movie every time the vlad opens up -the strategic bullshit reserve- his mouth
I like listening to our enemies. They may lie but they tend to reveal themselves. Putin strikes me as the guy who thinks he’s the smartest man in the room and everyone is too terrified to correct him. I don’t think Tucker was a traitor or a mouthpiece but he was largely steamrolled.
@@pastohh Bowtie had an interview, that's not treason, it's literally what journalists should be doing and have been doing for decades at this point with America's enemies. Do you think Peter Bergen and Clarissa Ward, both of CNN, are traitors for interviewing Osama Bin Laden and ISIS leadership? Robert Fisk, again OBL? Any interview conducted with AQ after the fall of Afghanistan? Any interview with Hussein? Kim Jong Un? Just because he's someone who you don't like interviewing someone who you don't like doesn't mean he's committed an act of treason. Hell, the interview wasn't even that bad, Putin is just clever enough to make it all about his narrative, kinda what you expect from a politician.
Carlson is just way out of his depth. I think he believed this was the scoop of the century but when you’re interviewing a subject who has absolute control over the narrative, one which you agree with entirely, you come across as a sad lazy sycophantic propagandist rather than a hard hitting journalist. There’s nothing in this whole interview that shows Carlson did any serious research before the interview, mainly because any research would’ve countered everything Putin said. It demonstrates the complete lack of curiosity on the right; more obsessed with vacuous culture wars than real working policies.
Just found your channel (youtube recommended it). Glad someone is doing something to promote the truth, I feel very strongly about the Ukraine war and I really hope Ukraine will prevail, I am just too lazy to start a youtube channel to debunk the constant lies. Subbed.
Tucker: So why did you invade Ukraine? Putin: In the time before time; the Great Spirit descended from the heavens carrying we, the ones called the Matoran, to this paradise. We were separate and without purpose. So the Great Spirit illuminated us with the three virtues: Unity, Duty, and Destiny. We embraced these gifts, and in gratitude we named our island home Mata Nui... after the Great Spirit himself. But our happiness was not to last, for Mata Nui’s brother, the Makuta, was jealous of these honors and betrayed him: casting a spell over Mata Nui, who fell into a deep slumber... The Makuta was free to unleash his shadows. And unleash them, he did…
First! I love the modern analysis in the videos I’ve seen - an incredible mix of storytelling, objective (and well-cited) research, and unique personal analysis. Keep it up, my friend! Lots of love from the States
This interview and the internet's response to it gave me Prigozhin-mutiny vibes. I was borderline giggling because I knew it was gonna be a shitshow yet it still managed to be even better
Honestly, I looked at how Russian historians reacted to the interview with Putin and Carlson and learned a lot of interesting facts. 1. Putin said that the southern lands of Rus' (Ukraine) themselves began to move away from the general culture of Rus'. In fact, they were captured by Lithuania, and Ukrainian culture began to take shape even before the Mongol invasion. 2. Putin said that Ukraine promised to be a neutral country and not enter into any alliances. In fact, there is nothing of the kind in the act of declaring the independence of Ukraine, and Ukraine, like Russia, could freely form or join existing military or economic blocs. 3. Putin said that the Russian leadership initiated the collapse of the Soviet Union, only Putin himself at that time was part of this same Russian leadership and, in fact, Putin blamed himself for the collapse of the Soviet Union. Idiot. 4. Putin actually admitted his defeat in the war, but he is not going to give up the conquered territories, and therefore Putin is waiting for the West to make concessions, that is, to begin negotiations on the Korean scenario. As a citizen of the Russian Federation, I am very angry with our president and, unfortunately, I have no other options for influencing the authorities than to ask to invade my country, but this means the third world war. If anyone believes that the upcoming elections in Russia will be fair and transparent, then you are naive. I'm tired of living in a country where the head of state uses power as a means of his own entertainment, and not for the benefit of the country's population. I remember Putin once said: *Why do we need a world where there will be no Russia?* I also want to say something: *Why do we need a Russia ruled by Putin?*
Tucker: President Putin, I want to know absolutely everything that's happened up till now. Putin: Well, let's see. First the earth cooled. And then the dinosaurs came, but they got too big and fat, so they all died and they turned into oil. And then the Arabs came and they bought Mercedes Benzes. And Prince Charles started wearing all of Lady Di's clothes. I couldn't believe it. He took her best summer dress, put it on and went to town.
Putin blew his opportunity to appeal to American conservatives. Normally Russian propaganda, when targeting American conservatives, makes the conflict about progressive degeneracy VS social conservatism/Christianity, but Putin didn't do so. He also didn't talk about how opposed he is to the establishment or praise Trump.
@@erikesangarbonzo8846 Yes, That was definitely the first time in human history that that happened. Just like Tucker being the first western Journalist trying to get an Interview with Putin.
Tucker: Why'd you invade Ukraine? Putin: In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God. He was in the Beginning with God. Through Him all things were made and without Him nothing was made that was made...
As a history geek, then I cant wrap my head around the idea that Poland forced Hilter to invade and start WW2. If that was the case, then what where the false flag operation "Gleiwitz Incident" even for? Im sure Hilter would had other reasons to justify for war against Poland if Poland forced Hilter to invade. And I also like how the discount Hilter saying that WW2 started on the extact date, like it was planned all along. It started on that date because Hilter invaded Poland, and UK and France at the time said stop. The war could in all honesty had started earlier or later then 1st of September. And on the topic of WW2. I dont know if Putin said it during that interview, but I know he claimed before that USSR won WW2 all alone. Which isnt true. USA especially and UK helped to supply USSR with the Lend Lease, and USSR had been on the backbone if it wasnt for the supply of war equipment and vehicles. Also, to point out, it was also USSR leaders at the time that whined that the allied should open up an other front in Europe, which the allied already had planed with Operation Overlord. That is why the Italian front got so messy, because there wasnt time to prepare fully and it was rushed to pressure the germans. USSR nearly made the war in Europe fail because they werent able to keep momentum and wanting the allies to take of the pressure from the eastern front
So, why did Poland attack Czechoslovakia alongside Germans before Russia attacked Poland with Germans? I only recently found out about Poland attacking Czechoslovakia because that part was not being mentioned in the events that led to WWII. Is it because Czechoslovakia beat them bad? But again I feel like it was important because Czechoslovakia had to fight on two fronts instead of focusing on Nazzis?
It makes perfect sense, if you're of the believe, that the "weak" not submitting to the "strong" is some kind of crime against the Superior & the march of history.
@@js4182 *"So, why did Poland attack Czechoslovakia alongside Germans?"* It didn't. *"I only recently found out"* That explains a lot. *"because that part was not being mentioned in the events that led to WWII."* Probably because it (what actually happened) didn't lead to WW2 any more than any other detail irrelevant to what the main actor wanted and did.
@@js4182 One can debate if it was opportunism, if Poland wanted to safeguard Czechoslovak areas with a large Polish minority, as well as strategic railroad points from falling into the hands of the Nazis through the Munich Agreement, or both. However, Two things are certain: 1) Poland didn't attack Czechoslovakia "alongside (the) Germans", (there was no co-operation between Polish and German troops) and (2) It wasn't an event that was instrumental in leading to WWII, but one resulting FROM the lead-up. Finally: With a combined death-tole of less than 200 men, it was hardly a battle for the ages or something you could describe as "The Polish getting beat bad".
Dont forget that two of his points for invading ukraine are: 1. Ukrainians are Russians 2. Ukrainians discriminated against russian minorities in donbas How can Russians discriminate against Russian minorities? Are they russians or do they have russian minorities? which one is it? Hilarious
@@kryzzan7039 ROC was restricted AFTER the invasion and only because it answers to Kyril who, as Patriarch of Moscow, is subject to Putin because of the Orthodox understanding that caesar is the head of the church.
The entire relationship between Russia and Ukraine is very much classic toxic relationship of one party being abused, gaslit and wanting to do nothing with the other. And when it acts out, it gets pummeled, while hearing screams "DO YOU SEE WHAT YOU MADE ME DO?!". This has been true during Red Terror, this has been true during USSR times, it's been true in the 90s and it's true right now.
When I first hear about this interview I assumed the Kremlin had hired Tucker as a mouthpiece. Now that I've watched it, I think he genuinely wanted to be seen as a serious big boy journalist. Which leads me to wonder just how he saw this interview going.
Another nice Otto quote: "I must protest that I would never seek foreign conflicts just to go over domestic difficulties; that would be frivolous" - 1862 Putin instead tries to suppress his inner democratic powers (which protested several times in the past against him) and declare martial law basically. If you can put your critics into jail by showing up with just an empty white piece of paper, you can - like in the book 1984 - hold up eternal war dictatorship.
The right hand isn't talking to the left. Russian propaganda has two flavors - one for Russians and one for the West. The messaging is very different between RT exported to the West and the internal news programs in Russia. The problem for Putin in this interview is that both audiences would watch. So Tucker softballed questions to coax answers that would satisfy pro-Rus Westerners. But Putin couldn't give those answers because they contradicted what he told Russians. It was a glorious lose-lose. I now use reaction videos to this interview as a litmus test for who is smart enough to recognize what happened. I've unsubscribed from half a dozen channels that I was concerned were vailed pro-Rus or slowly changed positions from the beginning of the war. I'm happy to see I can stay subscribed here. Thanks for all the excellent work you do.
They're premise is that the RF is the legal successor of the USSR. By the same principal, the RF shouldn't have a permanent seat on the UN security council (which is in and of itself hilarious)
The only thing i got out of it was Putin was upset the Russian state has always been the victim. First it was the Polish and Mongols. Then it became a pity party of waaa waaa the CIA waaaa. Putin just exposed the entire Russian state can be summed up as a 'Skill issue'
This is not even the first time Putin blamed Poland for everything. Look up TIK's video about it for a breakdown. But in the context of the interview, he's referring to the post WWI wars in Eastern Europe during the breakup of the Austro-Hungarian Empire and the complete political mess that ended up favoring the National Socialists in Germany being directly or indirectly tied to Polish action/inaction. Obviously the entire thing is making a mountain out of a molehill, but you gotta take into account that it's not trying to dissuade you from a Western POV, but rather reinforcing Putin's and, in a roundabout way, Russia's entire geopolitical history and the reason why they have to frame stuff the way they do (Supposed Denazification of a country led by a Jewish president, for instance).
Completely unrelated, I appreciate you and Lord HT putting notices at the beginning of videos that have swearing. Because it lets us know for sure that it's not something to play out loud in polite company. Similar to how most of us love metal or rap music, but we don't play it out loud when family is visiting, or at work. Same for shitting with the bathroom door open; we all do it, but not when family is over, and not at work.
I appreciate Putin finally outright saying what I've been shouting since the Crimean anschluß: he's a poor man's Hitler without even so much as an ideology to fall back on.
"Ukrainian think of themselves as russain" cue angry screaming from my roommate's grandmother in Ukrainian. P.s holly hell angry Ukrainian is terrifying
Putin saying that ukrain is a province state of russia is like biden saying britain is true american soil and should recognize it self as one of our stayes..
Having watched the whole interview (I recommend putting the video on 1.5x or higher speed) the historical revisionism is kinda hilarious, the later half is Putin basically dodging the responsibility of declaring war on Ukraine by saying everyone else didn't play ball, therefore it is all these other country's fault. Putin does a lot of lying by omission, which btw is what Tucker rants endlessly about in his usual claims about how we're all being lied to. So, Putin omitted a lot of history that would make his position look bad and I mean a LOT is omitted. Even the thing about Poland "starting WW2" omits things like German demands (they didn't just want Danzig, Germany expected Poland to say no as well), also about how the USSR simultaneously invaded Poland by agreement with Germany. Anyway, Putin is running a pokerface strategy where his hand is crap and thus he has to bluff everything. All of his interview is about showing that he is in a strong and legitimate position, which being a bluff, means he is in a weak and illegitimate position.
RE: the claim that Poland started WWII Given that Putin sees himself as Stalin, Jr., and Stalin had already agreed to split Poland with Adolf, and were co-belligerents, invading Poland from the East a mere two weeks after Germany did from the west, he HAS to justify the Soviet participation in the invasion of Poland.
Long ago in a distant land, I, Aku, the shape shifting master of darkness unleashed an unspeakable evil, but a foolish Samurai warrior wielding a magic sword stepped forth to oppose me!
We mostly agree, but I think you missed a theme. Tuktuk (I am so stealing that) was pushing putin to say that NATO enlargement was the main reason for war whereas putin was pushing the 'most of Ukraine is really Russia' narrative. NATO enlargement was presented at most as a contributing factor, but more so as a symptom of Ukrainian nationalism.
All the reasons given for this war just don't make sense. I still don't know what they're trying to achieve. Although I guess that's a common theme of war in general.
To be quiet honest, by watching the interview, it became quiet clear why the war occurred and what putin is trying to achieve. Putin is an angry russian boomer who wants the glory days back. He wants Russia to be relevant again, he wants Russia (and himself) to be so strong that it cannot be sidelined, and quiet honestly he sees Russia as a victim of social pariahism (which is true whether you believe warranted or not).
It's a crazy dictator who thought he could get away with grabbing all of Ukraine in a few days to a few months at most. That's all there is to it. Sometimes the simple answer is the right answer. If he didn't want Ukraine to join NATO, he could've stopped at annexing Crimea.
As russian its funny to see reactions on this from other countries. We been listening to this shit from 2014 and its been crazier and crazier year by year.
How is Zelensky doing? He spoke Russian all his life, and after February 24 he began to pretend that he did not know it and did not know it. He said that he would stop the war in eastern Ukraine, but he did not stop. Didn't even try For you, the war began on February 24, and for the people of Donbass on February 21, 2022. And it began with large artillery attacks from Ukraine
@@schlangen7889 He did try stop the war. Heavy weapons were beeing moved from there and feb 21 do you mean video of some hut in forest that they said to be FSB Hq or border guard it was 100%.
@@frontrussian4951 если ты украинец, скажи сразу. А шо ти дурню моришся. Скажи "Я хохол" і вся стане на свої місця Я из Донецка, и мне видней что происходило с 21 по 24
Russia also blamed Georgia for bombing Tskinavli (It's own people for no reason), de facto "South Ossetia" This guy beats Zelensky 10 times as a comedian.
I still cannot fathom how far gone the people making positive comments under Tucker's video must be... for anyone to say "omg so true" when Putin says WW2 was Poland's fault... 😂
I doubt any of them had the intellectual capacity to actually watch this kind of an interview. Probably can't get even through first 2 minutes when Putin starts his alternate history monolog. Luckily this manistic prick doesn't understand his audience.
Here are a few key things to remember: one, a channel's owner can moderate comments. Two, there are businesses you can hire that use large language models coupled with "acquired" accounts to falsify audience investment. Three, extremists have always existed and are never reasonable. Combine all that and more, and you get comment sections like that.
One thing worth mentioning which might be quite scary if you think about it, is that majority of Americans do not know or care about WW2 history that much beside what happened in the theatres of war that directly involved Americans. So for a lot of people Putin's version is going to be now the defacto story of how WW2 started. A lie told a thousand times becomes a reality.
6:00 The writing on top of the bridge tower says: Yana, I Love You! Don't know who Yana is, but it is important! ...Must be a swell lass, if she deserves climbing on top of this thing.
2:20 Putin clearly stated he was talking about GDP in terms of PPP. You must have missed that part. Per World Bank statistics, he was absolutely correct. Russia overtook Germany as the largest economy in Europe in terms of PPP.
The notion that Ukrainians do not exist as a district group from Russians is nonsensical, and Ukrainians could easily claim the same thing about Russians. While there is truth that they have a common origin as East Slavic people, the point at which they start to diverge is around the same time the Normans conquer Anglo-Saxon England. If the Russians and Ukrainians are not distinct people groups (albeit on sort of a language continuum) then neither are the Spanish different from the French, or the Dutch from the English or Germans. But I think more significantly the whole notion that not have a historical state removes your right to self-determination is nonsense. It is the logic of Hapsburg era imperial Europe. Before the mid-19th century there was never an Italian or German state, no Finnish nation state, no Croatia, no independent Norway. This does not mean these people did not have rights to form states of their own.
One thing about Lukashenko's photo next to the map - Transnistria is already occupied by russian troops and the arrow shows an attack from transnistria towards Odessa, not the other way around. Don't get me wrong, if russia somehow manages to annex the whole of ukraine it will probably also invade the republic of moldova, it already occupies the region of transnistria and can influence moldovan politics to a certain point (sponsoring politicians and bribing voters, also broadcasting propaganda to the russian minority who lives there), it can also start small conflicts in transnistria whenever it wants so its already set up for a potential invasion (significant russian minority they can claim is oppressed by the moldovan government and russian troops present to arm rebels or just launch attacks while pretending to be "rebels fighting against opressive government").
I am Russian, I am from Crimea. I currently am mostly on the Ukrainian side as lets just say a lot of evidence is on that (while the other side is mostly anecdotal evidence). I cannot believe that Putin dare say that Poland started ww2, cause it sounds like ignorance like saying USSR saved the baltic states or saying USSR saved Poland.
Before i watch this.. I watched about 5 minutes of the interview. I just happened to catch the part where he blamed Poland. I laughed/cried and switched it off. I can't even.
He didn't "blame Poland". He explained what was happening, although that topic requires hours of conversation. Poland made mistakes regarding their relationship with Germany prior to WW2, there is simply no denying that. Their refusal to cede territory that they took from Germany after WW1, where mostly Germans lived was also a mistake. They had no reason to hold on to those lands and risk war. They overestimated their allies and underestimated Germany.
Hi, very nice video. May I ask for the source of Russiskaja Gazeta statement regarding Gorbatschev and NATO expension? I would like to read/hear the Interview.
Carsons interviw was not done for us who can think for ourrself, it was done for the MAGA public. Who honestly cant listen to an argument that is longer than two sentences and who love to one line puncher to throw themselfs with.
Correction:
Putin said 1st in Europe, I said 11th, that is incorrect. It is 11th in the world as per the chart.
Still behind Germany, United Kingdom France and Italy isn't that great - especially that behind Italy part has to burn. Numbers look even worse per capita. Though maybe he's got diffrent numbers? There is a small point here that Russia didn't suffer as much as expected and especially Germany is looking at quite the recession.
Even that is incorrect as Germany, UK and France - AT LEAST - out pacing russia in economy, with other metrics even showing such countries as Italy, Holand and Spain ahead of russia in the most important economic factors.
@@STzim russia is suffering BEYOND what it claims - russia cooks the books - while Germany always has plans for recessions, in factvriding it out is part of the plan as in economy often the path of least resistance can bring better results. Recessions are an inevitability of capitalism and often comes as a plate cleance for the accumukation of economic malpractices caused by neoliberalism. Things only get worse if the neoliberals try to keep everything as it was, basically trying to fit a square in a circle.
Rate of growth in 23 Russia was #1 in Europe.
To be fair to putin, he talked about purchasing power parity. In that it's just behind germany, according to the imf, so number two in europe. PPP doesn't mean much though when you're talking about absolute economic "power". It just means if it wasn't a shithole (which it is) it would be doing about as well as germany (with almost twice the population). So not really a flex lol.
I'm Polish and I had no idea it was all my fault. I'm so sorry, big apologies to every fascist and communist regime which helped my country so much in the past.
You are very welcome, from a German. Still happy that you guys have twice as many tanks as us soon. Please stop at the french border if you have to use them, we dont want to get nuked.
You still owe us for invading Britain in 1066
I literally couldnt stop laughing about half way through because everything putin said was just "and then poland ruined everything"
You should! It happened nearly a decade ago, and you likely didn't live back then, but it is nearly 100% entirely your and your nations fault. Like all the other N@zis who forced Germany to counterinvade you, along with a few other countries while they were at it (as you do, France probably border Poland and would likely also have invaded Germany). I bet you dislike Jar Jar Binks too, you monster.
When I first heard it. I thought it was a joke and then the actual line was said
-so why did you invade ukraine
-before time began there was the cube
we know not where it comes from ...
Optimus Prime, is that you?
...And then the Americans deleted it!!
@@ZetaMoolah; Oh, I was thinking you were referring to the puzzle box from Hellraiser.
@@jvcyt298 I thought it was a reference to Time Cube which was a brilliantly deranged website "explaining" the nature of time, creation, the universe, the Bible, etc. An internet meme from the days before we called them internet memes.
Carlson: “I’m sorry, but what does having 4 men impersonating the heir to czar to the Russian throne in the early 1600’s [true story] have to do with your justification of invading Ukraine?”
Putin: “We get there when we get there!”
"I'm Dmitri!"
"I'm Dmitri!"
"Fuck you, I'm Dmitri!"
"Cyka blyat all of you, I'm Dmitri, and I say *hic* LISBON TO ANCHORAGE!"
why invading is bad?
@@pork_eater_Z666 Ты не поймешь, руzzкий. За тебя думает фюрер.
Putin had to stop Ukraine/NATO, but did he know Otto's quote?
Preventive war is like committing suicide for fear of death. -> Bismark 1876
Did he really said that? (Can you give sorce?)
We all must blame the polish lungfish that first developed primitive lungs 419 million years ago...
Clearly yes
"I am a Christian, which is why I follow the doctrine of always holding every grudge for thousands of years and making sure never to turn the other cheek!" - Vladimir Putin
I blame the Polish DNA that emerged 4 billion years ago, which refused to comply with entropy's demands.
These are good! Made my laugh out loud.
@@TriphexCorporationDifficult to turn those plastic trophy-wife cheeks anyway 😂
In Poland, the situation was even more reverse. It was not forced to join NATO, but rather it forced NATO to accept Poland as a member via clever diplomacy exploiting American political rivalries
Yup!
The idea that NATO can involuntarily force membership is always so laughable. Exactly what advantage do they think NATO could possibly gain from forcing a small country to join their mutual defense organization?
@@sofieselene 1.1 million tons of supercarrier showing up if someone pokes the bear a little to hard
It was black mail lets not beat around the bush it was outright blackmail
@@85isaboat53no one joined NATO out of fear the US would invade them.
Infact, the entire former Warsaw packed was practically banging done the door to NATO’s office as soon as they were freed from Russia’s communism.
And they were smart for that, because if they hadn’t, they would probably be like what Ukraine is now. Being invaded by the Russians.
Putin : we are fighting Nazis
Also Putin : Poland should have given Gdansk to the Nazis
While having Wagner be his dirty work crew for years despite it being started BY a Nazi with SS lightning runes on his collar.
“Why did you invade Ukraine?”
“Our WHOLE UNIVERSE WAS IN A HOT-DENSE STATE BUT NEARLY FOURTEEN BILLION YEARS AGO EXPANSION STARTED WAIT-“
Expansion towards the East, don't forget.
@@oleksandrbespalov9713maybe you shouldn’t invade and bully your neighbors if you dont want them to join Nato
@@oleksandrbespalov9713nato by definition can’t expand its borders because countries must volunteer to join nato and then ontop of that fact they must meet prerequisite requirements to be allowed within the organization upon application. The very existence of the application process ontop the debates that happen around the process of joining make the entire argument of nato expansion moot.
@@oleksandrbespalov9713 Nato can't expand in the way most people think of when they hear expansion. The only way they can expand is by having other countries join them willingly, and have all of the current countries in Nato agree to let them in. A country can't be forcefully brought into the alliance, because then such an alliance wouldn't work. tl;dr, Putins entire argument for Nato expansion doesn't work because these countries and their people are making the choice to willingly join Nato
I don't know guys why you keep talking about nato. My joke was about the universe expansion towards the East. And also I'm aware that the universe doesn't have any East. Yeah, now I'm explaining my jokes. Who have I become, oh god, oh god.
Tucker: "Why'd you invade Ukraine?"
Putin: "Long before time had a name, Ninjago was created by the First Spinjitzu Master, using the Four Weapons of Spinjitzu. The Scythe of Quakes, the Nunchucks of Lightning, the Shurikens of Ice and the Sword of Fire. Weapons so powerful, no one can handle all of their power at once! When he passed away, his two sons swore to protect them, but the oldest was consumed by darkness and wanted to possess them. A battle between brothers broke out, and the oldest was struck down and banished to the Underworld. Peace returned, and the younger brother hid the weapons, but knowing his older brother's relentless ambition for power, he placed a guardian to protect them. And for fear of his own demise, a map for an honest man to hide. That honest man was your father. The older brother is Lord Garmadon, and I... need to find those weapons before he does"
Nice
😂😂
"To stop NATO expansion, we invaded Ukraine."
To stop my leg from itching, I cut it off.
Or based off an actual Bismarck quote:
I feared death, so I killed myself.
"Mr. Putin, where are we going to eat after the interview"
"In 7 bc. the soviet union...."
Every word Putin spoke was true. The west has big plans for Ukraine THESE ARE THEIR WORDS. 1, They plan to shut down farming in Europe making it the crime of ECOCIDE punishment jail move it all to Ukraine. 2, Shitstain 🇬🇧 has spent big in Odesaa and the coast hoping Ukraine would build cheap warships. 3, Israelistan owns 30% of the land in Ukraine Black Rock and Vanguard planned to buy 100%. 4, Israelistan owns almost every major business in Ukraine just as they own Australian businesses. 5, Ukraine is losing the war its Military decimated. Redacted in the US announced Israelistan 🇺🇲 has ordered ZZelinsky to replace its entire government with western educated people who are LOYAL TO AMERICA this accounts for General Zalhuznyi a UkroNazi his replacement more acceptable to RUSSIA and the WEST. 6, The ploy to take Ukraine and the southern ports failed tbey thought they could fill it with war ships and block Russia's warm water ports. 7, The west thought creating a UkroNazi state yes there is film of an American Nazi explaining how the CIA used US Nazis to create AZOV Shitstain 🇬🇧 created right sector 1 and 2 using UK Nazis other groups KRAKEN etc exist they were handed territories where they ruled like medieval Barons. The war to collapse Russia failed Europe and Israelistan are bled dry of weapons cash and raw materials they hoped to steal via the total collapse of Ukraine and Russia have evaporated theyre broke. And now Africa has cut them off by stopping the looting of resources paying pennies on the dollar. China has stepped in providing massive infrastructure development at low cost instead of the IMF giving loans for mining etc where they set the price they pay. Israelistan or Firestone had a 100 year contract from 1926 where they paid Niger 6 cents per acre for 4 million acres 2,4 million per year. Ukraine is not a democracy all political parties are banned some leaders jailed. There is no free press reporters comply or face execution in the streets. Pablo Lira a US journalist was recently tortured there eventually dieing with no aid from Israelistan. Ukraine has committed thousands of war crines Germany led a commission to investigate Russian war crimes they got 300 all against the Ukraine Military. They have cut up the bodies of wounded UKR and Russian soldiers to sell the parts to Europe run by a female doctor from the Netherlands. They have fired on their own wounded trying to surrender ON FILM in fact the film of UKRONAZIS execution and torture of Russian soldiers was done on the orders of ZZelinsky himself. He also passed an order that anyone refusing to fight can be executed on the spot there is plenty of UKR film of that happening Poland complained when their Mercs were executed for refusing a suicide mission. The only question left given the desperate situation of the population who are being grabbed off the streets and sent to the front is how long before they take out ZZelinsky his own troops are already threatening him.
well, he did just give the time and place, so the question is technically answered
"I'm not calling it X, it's twitter"
Based.
It's just stupid. Hell, even for my day job in the financial services field, it is stupid. You don't ruin that kind of brand recognition.
I refuse to call it either one and instead refer to it by the proper name of "Social Media Cesspool That Truth Goes To Die In"
@@HistoryofEverythingChannel musk isn't exactly the brightest space african in the room
@@TheActionBastardto be fair, now that they added the fact check bubble the content on there is much better.
But yeah, changing it to "X" was stupid.
I prefer Xitter (pronounced Zitter) because it's like a pimple on Elon's flabby ass cheek
Of course it was us the Poles who caused World War II, we refused to see how Mr. Chamberlain's approach was working perfectly and how well Czechoslovakia did for itself.
ehhh. Let's remember the position Chamberlain was in. Britain needed time to re-arm. *Something* had to be sacrificed. I'm not saying it was good, or right, but I'm not sure what other options Britain had, particularly when the French were so dead-set against moving against Germany.
@@RaptorJesusand yet it was the Germans who took the most advantage of that time to rearm, allowing for their initial victories. The British and French on appear had better armies but were unwilling to use them when they could’ve landed a devastating blow against the Germans in 1939 or even earlier.
Instead the British ended up skiing much if their gear and France and had to rebuild in sort through lend lease.
@@RaptorJesus I´ve heard this cope a thousand times and it is simply not true. Chamberlain was not preparing for war, he wanted to avoid it, I don´t blame him, I am sure most of British public wanted as well, but he was just too naive to trust a word from a dictator. Giving a potential enemy up to 3 milion new subjects and criple an ally that would have taken the first strike, not to mention industrial capacity for war and weapons stocks that Germans will invavitably take over when they decide to roll into what was left of CS is something you don´t do if you want to "re-arm" faster than your enemy. Wehrmacht in 38 was a lot weaker than in 39, so was Hitler political position.
And to blame France for this is simply not fair when it was mainly Chamberlain who was super pro-active in this regard. I have no problem if you defend his character as someone who just wanted to avoid WW1 scenario but don´t make his biggest L into some 200 IQ chess move, watch his arrival into Britain with the piece of paper signed by Hitler and tell me if he looks like somebody who "sacrificed something to buy time".
Please just stop this narative, even if you are British, this does not make UK look better, it makes it look worse.
Let’s be honest. If France, Britain and Poland together has said a firm NO at München, as well as asked counties like Yugoslavia, Romania Bulgaria etc to back them up? Then Hitler likely would have backed down from that coalition, or been soundly beaten.
But, in Britain and France did not have the public supper, and the others would not act alone
@@baneofbanes This is true, but there was simply no public support in either nation for action against Germany. It would've been political suicide, likely resulting in serious discontent. I don't even know if the French military would've obeyed the order.
"Latios is my waifu" - Bismarck
Russia is always a victim. No matter what. This allows them to prepare for defence in a war which will never be by invading other countries.
Just like the developers of the recent "game" (Scam), The Day Before.
I believe the Romans called this "Defensive Invasions", a term invented to mock the rhetoric in the senate where no matter what, every time Rome went to war it was somehow "Defensive" even if they started things first it was always to "Protect Rome" and therefore justified.
Congrats you just understood how everything works 🎉. Now imagine we here live near that lunatic for the last 20 years
@@alexsharp9813 For all you know the person you're talking to does live next to them, or could be a NATO soldier who had to fight Russia in the Cold War and deal with their propaganda.
@@TriphexCorporation for all you know my friend - I am Ukrainian soldier fighting since march 2022 🙃 listen carefully to what the man says in this video :)
And now I want to see an Italian politician claiming that Italy should rule France or Britain because the Roman Empire was there 2000 years ago.
That's the level of putler's pseudo-historical bullshit.
To be fair, many parts of England could do with a bit of old-SQPR discipline.
I say that as a Londinium-er.
@@threethrushesbring back the danelaw
yeah what did the Romans ever do for us ?
Someone could use Putin's case here to say that Crimea actually belongs to the Greeks with their roughly two-and-a-half-millennium older claim to the territory. (History can be gamed *so hard*.)
TBF the Italians do have insane enough politicians that I wouldn't be surprised
i feel like tucker deserves atleast some credit, he did basicly prove to the world that putin is indeed a madman.
That's the problem with going up to an egotistical totalitarian maniac and telling him "YOU SUCK, YOU'RE EVIL... Wait why aren't you granting my requests for an interview?" Like so many journalists and politicians are too invested in virtue signaling instead of reporting or diplomacy. Sometimes you need to bite your tongue in order to get to the bottom of things. You can't just run in like a screaming banshee and expect to get the same results as someone who tries to be a bit more tactful.
(It certainly doesn't help that journalists that are tactful are attacked and labeled as being traitors because they don't start an argument mid-interview and get kicked out for unruly behavior as a sign of protest... Or maybe it's to eliminate and discredit competition?)
Reminds me of one short I saw about an overweight computer guy talking about "we already have a journalist in Russia!" (And he goes into how he's imprisoned, not at all why he was.) Really, we already have a journalist? (A WSJ hired one nonetheless.) ONE journalist? And we can only have one journalist per country? Come on man, that's cope.
I don't care if Tucker wants to suck Putin's toes. I want to hear the lies Putin has to say. I don't want some dressed up personality telling me that "it's too dangerous for you to hear, it might corrupt your mind and turn you alt-right!!!" I think they're afraid of people creating their independent thoughts and narratives. Even if it already aligns with their narrative, they don't like the precedent it sets. Could spell disaster in the long run. Especially since it incentivizes people to look at other news sources because the mainstream ones already blew their shot. Being careless and pandery.
Some credit? He actually went up there like a journalist and interviewed Putin. He didn't intentionally antagonize Putin as a form of virtuous protest so that the opinionated people know who to side with and what news sources to "trust" as a circlejerk. Because midwits hate having to think up their own thoughts. Because the mainstream is in the business of propagandizing, there is an actual demand for real unfiltered news. Tucker saw that demand, and whatever his biases may be, took advantage of it. And I will have to say, I'm loving this return to more "traditional" journalism.
and made maga/tankies admire him even more
Tucker is a cuck
@@besconst Someone really needs to tell them they're not the ones giving orders or riding on tanks.
They're the ones getting rolled over by tanks.
"Why did you invade Ukraine?"
"We had grave concerns at the state of their shopping carts..."
As a semi Mexican, it’s nice to know that Mexico has a higher gdp per capita than Russia
So a country with a lower GDP than Mexico is wiping the floor with NATO? That's hilarious.
No.1 reason why Ukraine (or anyone, for that matter) does not want to be part of Russia:
1. It's Russia.
Russia hasn't been a nice place to live since about 200ad?
@@planescapedwasnt it the kyiv russ at that time
I’d rather not be in any Eastern European shit hole. My family comes from Russia and boy am I glad I didn’t have to grow up there or in Ukraine.
and "russia" is a 1700's rebranding of its former name moscovia. They are liars and thieves.
its still was much better economy than ukraine. Donbas had its own militia like 50k troops ,nobody could force them to go against Kyiv regime.
So why is--
4.3 billon years a..........
*Takes a tablet, starts playback of "history of the entire world, i guess" where the reson for literally everything had been replaced by -DA JOOS- DA POLES
“In the beginning the Universe was created. This has made a lot of people very angry and been widely regarded as a bad move”
In the beginning, there was the cube
@@theamericanpotatonamedphil4306In the beginning, there was no cube. And God said, "Let there be Russians," and there were Russians. And God turned to look at something, turned back and there was THE CUBE
And we all know Poland is to blame 😮😂@@dx-ek4vr
I honestly can’t blame TC for this interview. Especially after the fact. Look at his face after putin said Poland started WWII. Then every 10 minutes for the first half of the interview. Tucker always rolls out a “how is this relevant?” or “So you’ve been president for 20 years, why bring this up now?”
So to sums up:
Carlson: "Why did you invade Ukraine?"
Putin: "Has anyone ever told you the legend of Darth Plagueis the Wise?"
Facts
I absolutely can. That dude is a twat-waffle supreme with extra shit sauce. He sat there and just let the guy walk on his face... but I guess that's par for the course for an ex-Fox "news" person... they let Orange Dumbass walk on their face all the time.
then he went to a russian supermarket and did some russian propaganda.
Tucker always has a face of dumbfounded constipation.
Exactly. Everyone is trying to insult Tucker for this interview but he’s literally just asking some basic questions and Putin is attempting rewrite history but Tucker is clearly not believing any of it, he’s clearly baffled at how Putin thinks he’s telling accurate information.
Putin former KGB.. listening to his version of history is like listening to Gurring's version of German history.
Gurring? You mean Göring? Hermann "We love 'muh aryans' so much we'll start a war that'll forever-sleep millions of aryans" Göring?
Yeah I can see the resemblance between him and Valdimir "we love slavs so much we'll start a war that'll forever-sleep thousands (at the very least) of slavs" Putin.
Eerily similar.
@@RaptorTroll360 He as i said was KGB they already did. He was part of that.. Be careful with that name.. Youtuube/FB ban people for certain names. i just came off one.. for using the German part name at the time. Apparently history is now "hate"
About the Bismarck Quote:
I searched roughly 1 hour in different german archivs and the library of my universtity for "bismarck" and "potential", and couldnt find anything.
Also, just a personal observation:
The word potential, or potenzial in german, sounds pretty off for the time period, and for Bismarck as well.
I felt the same way, the word just didn't fit
Also doesn't sound very Prussian.
They were more like "Potential is irrelevant - what counts is Actions".
(i.e.: "Put up or shut up")
It's a paraphrase but otherwise correct. It was a common theme with Bismarck that the external perceptions of your country are guided by its potential to undertake warfare, actual or economic. The section from the interview is:
"The West is afraid of a strong China more than it fears a strong Russia because Russia has 150 million people, and China has a 1.5 billion population, and its economy is growing by leaps and bounds -- over five percent a year, it used to be even more. But that's enough for China. As Bismark once put it, potentials are most important."
When questioned over his "Blood and Iron" speech, Bismarcks response was :
"The importance of a state is measured by the number of soldiers it can put into the field of battle"
Bismarcks speech to the Reichstag in 1888 again emphasizes dictating the attitudes of others (most importantly the French) through the increased potential of a unified Germany:
"We must, to put it briefly, be as strong in these times as we can possibly be, and we can be stronger than any other nation of equal numbers in the world...if we do not need our full armed strength, we need not summon it.
...
By nature we are rather tending away, the one from the other. But the Franco-Russian press within which we are squeezed compels us to hold together, and by pressure our cohesive force is greatly increased.
...
But we must respond to the intentions of providence by making ourselves so strong that the pikes can do nothing but encourage us."
All of this is about unifying Germany to increase its potential.
@@stevesargent8731 no, you were supposed to spend 10 hours to find out what is Potencial gosudarstva.
@@worldoftancraft you mean like this from Бисмарк и Россия. 1851-1871 гг:
Despite the Crimean tragedy, Bismarck considered Russia's position in international relations to be solid, only slightly weakened by the articles of the Paris Peace Treaty, and noted the great domestic and international potential of the state.
or in Russian:
Несмотря на Крымскую трагедию, Бисмарк считал положение России в международных отношениях прочным, лишь несколько ослабленным статьями Парижского мирного договора, и отмечал большой внутренний и международный потенциал государства
(there are other examples )
As I said, it was a fairly common theme with Bismarck :-)
So Putin is a Hitler/Nazi apologist, who also ignored that Russia joined Nazi Germany in invading and dividing Poland, then goes on to equate himself to Adolf Hitler, after 2 years calling for a witch-hunt for Nazis, all the while employing people who are unabashedly Nazi sympathizers going so far as to have a Swatstika as a the logo of the Zimargl subunit of Rusich Group.
Sometimes I wonder if the greatest threat to humanity is ultimately a lack of self-awareness and an over abundance of hypocrisy. Bunker Grandpa here is a good example, if the end ever comes our history is going to read like a morbid comedy.
Nazism to them is fighting against them, not for examle the actual Nazi Regime.
Indeed, rumors about putler being a huge fan of H were going around since quite a few month.
With this interview, he candidly confirmed he is an actual neo-N
"...a lack of self awareness and an over abundance of hypocrisy."
Never have I heard it put so well, but I whole heartedly agree. Ain't it grand?
Yes thank you for spelling it out for everyone here. We were thinking something similar.
Putin is a fascist. Of course he obsessively jerks off over Daddy Hitler. All fascists do.
As a German studying history with a focus in prussian history, I think, that i know the potential source for that Bismarck quote. I think it is from a personal correspondence regarding the difference in industrial potential between the north German confederation and the austrian alined German states before the austro-prussian war in 1866. But they have only the sleightest resemblance. In that letter at least, Bismarck did not say the sentence, that Putin quotes. He either got a terrible translation of the correspondence or just straight up Made that quote up and attributed it to Bismarck to give it more weight.
P.S.: Sorry for the english mistakes.
Dein Englisch ist sehr gut. Ich hatte das Gefühl, dass es sich um einen solchen Brief handeln könnte.
I only (barely) speak English and yours is better than mine. Apologies not accepted 😂
@@unit1738незабравяи винаги има някои по лош
/dont forget theres allways someone worse
"Great video, even if you're an Aussie."
Bismarck, probably
Putin comparing himself to Hitler is just hilarious. Poland started WWII just like Ukraine started Putin's invasion of Ukraine. Putin does came across as a whiny wokest.
The wokest.
It’s like an animal abuser saying the cat started it
Actually the Jews declared war on Germany in 34. Headlines of Jewish/Zionist papers said “Jews of the world declare war on Germany” at the time. Little known fact. Obviously Poland was and still is Zionist controlled but technically it was the Jews who wanted the war first.
Probably Putin are not aware Hitler was a yatzi, exactly what Putin is fighting
Putin IS a whiny woke lefty. He is a Communist after all. He loves the USSR and Stalin. He is passive-aggressive. His goal is power for the sake of power, not righteousness. He uses masochistic tendencies and plays the victim. That is the definition of Leftism according to Industrial Society and Its Future. Leftists are highly neurotic.
10/10 intro. "i do not care, you will live"
You're really gonna upset the Vatniks with this one
I'm giggling
@@HistoryofEverythingChannel we have to enjoy the little things! Thank you for the work you do 🫂
Vatniks be damned
The Vatniks are always upset.
We can only hope…
Regarding the invasion of Poland, Putin also fails to mention that it was in fact invaded by two armies, the other being the russian.
I mean... Stalin found out about the German plan to invade in May, 3 months before it would happen, thanks to a Soviet soy working in Berlin.
At that point he was faced with a choice: let Germany take some of Poland, or all of it. Which would you have chosen?
@@LancesArmorStriking You didn't need spies to know in 1939 there will be war. Draft in Poland started in April and was only delayed on request of France and Great Britain.
And by your logic any war is opportinity to take teritories of your neighbour. Poland has to invade now Ukrainine just because Russia invaded Ukraine, and Ukraine can lose? It's pure absurd. Russia had no right to invade Poland in 1939 and is as much responsible for II world war as Nazis. And Russia even made a deal with Nazis (Ribbentrop - Molotov pact together with secret protocols). To justify such a atrocity is simply to have no decency.
@@LancesArmorStriking No? Because Stalin didn't make the deal. Ribbentrop had reccommended Stalin to Hitler early May to subvert the British-Polish pact and Hitler initiated negotiations to which Stalin had no problems with. Seeing as how the Germans signed the Munich agreement because they didn't have supplies, Stalin should've sided with the Allies. It's a miracle the Germans even got far as to Poland from how under prepared they were.
Between actively supplying the guy that wants to literally exterminate or enslave everyone of your race and culture and your market rivals. I think a peice of Poland wasn't worth being alienated from the Allies for the rest of history.
As a russian I'm absolutely disgusted with Putin, his reasoning and his delusional worldview.
And I'm not alone in this.
Your not Russian, shut up. He is still very POPULAR thant the rest of Western leaders
Putin saying Poland forced Germany into attacking. I know there are some people around here in Germany who really like this point.
also they really like russia for some reason, which is really contrary to those they pretend to look up to. i guess money is more important than ideals to them.
It’s a standard neo-Nazi talking point.
@@baneofbanes which is why I see a lot of people in the German parliament *cough cough* AfD *cough cough* liking the fact that Putler said that
Germany is the most leftist country on earth
It was a nazi red flag operation. Nobody believed it even back then.
Dear Putin, our expectations were low but DAMN.
JDAM even!
It's his headstone. He can write whatever story he wants on it.
8:15 ... Saying Ukrainians see themselves as Russian is the same as saying Canadians see themselves as American. It's fucking insulting.
or Americans seeing themselves as British
@@bosermann4963 that one is more on the money, but still none of those compare, Ukrainians have suffered under Russia for 100's of years, and have had their culture and language be attacked multiple times as Russia tried to erase it, Ukranians have faced ethnic cleansing campaigns such as forced deportations and the holodomor (which btw Ukranians had a big enough harvest to feed it's people and most of the starving soviet citizens but the soviet government confiscated the food as they had agreements to sell the foodstuffs to other nations and they didn't give one fuck about the fact that the failed harvest in Russia proper meant there was not enough for domestic needs which resultet in a famine in most of the USSR which hit Ukrainians especially hard as most of their production was for the international market)
true, source: am Ukrainian.@@NiklasMJ
It’s even more than that, as Ukrainian is a completely separate language.
@@baneofbanes Hell, Ukraine existed as a nation, LONG before Russia did
I looked up the full Russian transcript of the interview to find the Otto Von Bismarck quote. I thought perhaps the translator didn’t give us the true English version of the quote. So here it is in Russian.
Как однажды сказал Бисмарк, потенциалы являются наиболее важными.
So in Russian Putin did not directly quote Bismarck. No quotation marks. So it is an alleged summary of something he said. I tried googling Bismarck and this phrase in Russian. No hits. So I couldn’t find what Putin is quoting in Russian.
Putin's source: I made it the fuck up
Putin’s source: ‘trust me tovarich’
I understand interviewing an enemy, but Carlson looked like someone who was disappointed when they met their hero. Comedically awful by every measure
He’s such a Russian fanboy that it must have been an earth shattering revelation of how unhinged Putin sounds.
@connormclernon26 I don't think he's a fanboy, he's much too cynical for that. Far more likely he has a material interest imo.
@@robertharrington703 fair enough, 80/20 how much he’s paid to what he genuinely believes then
The idea that Tucker is actually some huge Russia simp or particularly looks up to Putin i think is laughable. It's simply a cheap smear to try and dismiss him. This type of attack just feeds the populist backlash he type of people that maybe attracted to him as a form of defiance if nothing else.
@@robertharrington703well getting a big and controversial interview in itself would obviously help his brand and exposure. Thats a "material interest'.
Putin: "NATO expand eastwards!"
Also Putin: expand westwards
Also also Putin: scares new countries to join NATO
Me: are Putin paid by NATO to ruin Russia!?
I'm starting to believe that Putin is a CIA operative
You may be on to something there!
I guess some people will confuse Putin's stupid instinct on how to behave as for him being smart, but actually it is more like his primitive instinct about dominance
That's a very popular hypothesis
in some circles
- Mr. Putin, so why did you invade Ukraine?
- 4 billion years ago Earth was in the phase of cooling-
Given that RU has not released any evidence about their economy past two years except "Trust me bro, I'm fine" the 11th place in world chart might be as well 11th place in EU chart. And Russia is not entirely Europe, it's half Asia.
I saw the first 5 second intro and my hands are already moving towards my emotional support vodka, turns out it's the right call.
How much liver damage have done for you to listen the whole thing, multiple times?
At least 10 years of my life is gone
@@HistoryofEverythingChannel Oh dear, we need you around to make it through 2024, possibly into 2025, stay strong for more incoming bullshit!
@@yaki_ebiko We desperately need someone to add "Incoming!" line they put into every WW2 movie every time the vlad opens up -the strategic bullshit reserve- his mouth
@@theleva7 Hit the deck!
I like listening to our enemies. They may lie but they tend to reveal themselves. Putin strikes me as the guy who thinks he’s the smartest man in the room and everyone is too terrified to correct him.
I don’t think Tucker was a traitor or a mouthpiece but he was largely steamrolled.
So a dictator? And yeah bowtie boy is a traitor.
@@pastohh If he's too stupid to know he's a traitor, does it count, I wonder? I honestly don't know.
@@MeeesterBond17 he's like a mouth breathing version of Lord Haw Haw
@@pastohh Bowtie had an interview, that's not treason, it's literally what journalists should be doing and have been doing for decades at this point with America's enemies. Do you think Peter Bergen and Clarissa Ward, both of CNN, are traitors for interviewing Osama Bin Laden and ISIS leadership? Robert Fisk, again OBL? Any interview conducted with AQ after the fall of Afghanistan? Any interview with Hussein? Kim Jong Un?
Just because he's someone who you don't like interviewing someone who you don't like doesn't mean he's committed an act of treason. Hell, the interview wasn't even that bad, Putin is just clever enough to make it all about his narrative, kinda what you expect from a politician.
Carlson is just way out of his depth. I think he believed this was the scoop of the century but when you’re interviewing a subject who has absolute control over the narrative, one which you agree with entirely, you come across as a sad lazy sycophantic propagandist rather than a hard hitting journalist.
There’s nothing in this whole interview that shows Carlson did any serious research before the interview, mainly because any research would’ve countered everything Putin said. It demonstrates the complete lack of curiosity on the right; more obsessed with vacuous culture wars than real working policies.
Just found your channel (youtube recommended it). Glad someone is doing something to promote the truth, I feel very strongly about the Ukraine war and I really hope Ukraine will prevail, I am just too lazy to start a youtube channel to debunk the constant lies. Subbed.
Tucker: So why did you invade Ukraine?
Putin: In the time before time; the Great Spirit descended from the heavens carrying we, the ones called the Matoran, to this paradise. We were separate and without purpose. So the Great Spirit illuminated us with the three virtues: Unity, Duty, and Destiny.
We embraced these gifts, and in gratitude we named our island home Mata Nui... after the Great Spirit himself.
But our happiness was not to last, for Mata Nui’s brother, the Makuta, was jealous of these honors and betrayed him: casting a spell over Mata Nui, who fell into a deep slumber...
The Makuta was free to unleash his shadows.
And unleash them, he did…
Bismarck did say it. But it was Bennie Bismarck from Brighton Beach. Not Otto.
First! I love the modern analysis in the videos I’ve seen - an incredible mix of storytelling, objective (and well-cited) research, and unique personal analysis. Keep it up, my friend! Lots of love from the States
Thank you so much
This interview and the internet's response to it gave me Prigozhin-mutiny vibes. I was borderline giggling because I knew it was gonna be a shitshow yet it still managed to be even better
Honestly, I looked at how Russian historians reacted to the interview with Putin and Carlson and learned a lot of interesting facts.
1. Putin said that the southern lands of Rus' (Ukraine) themselves began to move away from the general culture of Rus'. In fact, they were captured by Lithuania, and Ukrainian culture began to take shape even before the Mongol invasion.
2. Putin said that Ukraine promised to be a neutral country and not enter into any alliances. In fact, there is nothing of the kind in the act of declaring the independence of Ukraine, and Ukraine, like Russia, could freely form or join existing military or economic blocs.
3. Putin said that the Russian leadership initiated the collapse of the Soviet Union, only Putin himself at that time was part of this same Russian leadership and, in fact, Putin blamed himself for the collapse of the Soviet Union. Idiot.
4. Putin actually admitted his defeat in the war, but he is not going to give up the conquered territories, and therefore Putin is waiting for the West to make concessions, that is, to begin negotiations on the Korean scenario.
As a citizen of the Russian Federation, I am very angry with our president and, unfortunately, I have no other options for influencing the authorities than to ask to invade my country, but this means the third world war. If anyone believes that the upcoming elections in Russia will be fair and transparent, then you are naive. I'm tired of living in a country where the head of state uses power as a means of his own entertainment, and not for the benefit of the country's population.
I remember Putin once said: *Why do we need a world where there will be no Russia?*
I also want to say something: *Why do we need a Russia ruled by Putin?*
You make a case good sir, and as a American I wish for you in future such good fortune comes to you going forward… for all are sakes
Tucker: President Putin, I want to know absolutely everything that's happened up till now.
Putin: Well, let's see. First the earth cooled. And then the dinosaurs came, but they got too big and fat, so they all died and they turned into oil. And then the Arabs came and they bought Mercedes Benzes. And Prince Charles started wearing all of Lady Di's clothes. I couldn't believe it. He took her best summer dress, put it on and went to town.
✈️ reference😂
Putin blew his opportunity to appeal to American conservatives. Normally Russian propaganda, when targeting American conservatives, makes the conflict about progressive degeneracy VS social conservatism/Christianity, but Putin didn't do so. He also didn't talk about how opposed he is to the establishment or praise Trump.
Instead he got “progressive” and “anti imperialist” useful idiots on the left without realising it.
i mean, russian propaganda is pretty much 24/7 about crushing the "Evil western globohomos". this interview was mostly just historical revisionism.
Tucker Carlson gave Putin an open mic to talk to a large, influential and extremely sympathetic audience. It's good to know that he blew it
Sadly he didn’t, people will watch and believe it regardless.
@@andrewrogers3067all the closeted and not so closeted fascists in America will still believe ol’ Tuck no matter how stupid he sounds.
Blew it? He is the first polititian to actualy answer to questions
@@erikesangarbonzo8846 Yes, That was definitely the first
time in human history that that happened.
Just like Tucker being the first western Journalist trying to
get an Interview with Putin.
You overestimate Murican education.
Bro literally said “hitler did nothing wrong” 🤣
Tucker: Why'd you invade Ukraine?
Putin: In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God. He was in the Beginning with God. Through Him all things were made and without Him nothing was made that was made...
As a history geek, then I cant wrap my head around the idea that Poland forced Hilter to invade and start WW2. If that was the case, then what where the false flag operation "Gleiwitz Incident" even for? Im sure Hilter would had other reasons to justify for war against Poland if Poland forced Hilter to invade. And I also like how the discount Hilter saying that WW2 started on the extact date, like it was planned all along. It started on that date because Hilter invaded Poland, and UK and France at the time said stop. The war could in all honesty had started earlier or later then 1st of September.
And on the topic of WW2. I dont know if Putin said it during that interview, but I know he claimed before that USSR won WW2 all alone. Which isnt true. USA especially and UK helped to supply USSR with the Lend Lease, and USSR had been on the backbone if it wasnt for the supply of war equipment and vehicles. Also, to point out, it was also USSR leaders at the time that whined that the allied should open up an other front in Europe, which the allied already had planed with Operation Overlord. That is why the Italian front got so messy, because there wasnt time to prepare fully and it was rushed to pressure the germans. USSR nearly made the war in Europe fail because they werent able to keep momentum and wanting the allies to take of the pressure from the eastern front
Poland didn't actively seek to join the 3rd Reich so it's quite obvious, right? Clearly their fault!
So, why did Poland attack Czechoslovakia alongside Germans before Russia attacked Poland with Germans?
I only recently found out about Poland attacking Czechoslovakia because that part was not being mentioned in the events that led to WWII. Is it because Czechoslovakia beat them bad? But again I feel like it was important because Czechoslovakia had to fight on two fronts instead of focusing on Nazzis?
It makes perfect sense, if you're of the believe,
that the "weak" not submitting to the "strong" is some
kind of crime against the Superior & the march of history.
@@js4182
*"So, why did Poland attack Czechoslovakia alongside Germans?"*
It didn't.
*"I only recently found out"*
That explains a lot.
*"because that part was not being mentioned in the events that led to WWII."*
Probably because it (what actually happened) didn't lead to WW2 any more than any other detail irrelevant to what the main actor wanted and did.
@@js4182 One can debate if it was opportunism,
if Poland wanted to safeguard Czechoslovak areas with a large Polish minority,
as well as strategic railroad points from falling into the hands of the Nazis through the Munich Agreement,
or both.
However, Two things are certain: 1) Poland didn't attack Czechoslovakia "alongside (the) Germans",
(there was no co-operation between Polish and German troops)
and (2) It wasn't an event that was instrumental in leading to WWII, but one resulting FROM the lead-up.
Finally: With a combined death-tole of less than 200 men, it was hardly a battle for the ages
or something you could describe as "The Polish getting beat bad".
Dont forget that two of his points for invading ukraine are:
1. Ukrainians are Russians
2. Ukrainians discriminated against russian minorities in donbas
How can Russians discriminate against Russian minorities? Are they russians or do they have russian minorities? which one is it?
Hilarious
By banning the Russian Orthodox church and banning all Russian political parties? By targeting ethnic Russians?
@@kryzzan7039 ROC was restricted AFTER the invasion and only because it answers to Kyril who, as Patriarch of Moscow, is subject to Putin because of the Orthodox understanding that caesar is the head of the church.
the poland line made me laugh so hard because i was thinking:
"HOI4 isn't real history , danzig or war wasn't real"
The entire relationship between Russia and Ukraine is very much classic toxic relationship of one party being abused, gaslit and wanting to do nothing with the other. And when it acts out, it gets pummeled, while hearing screams "DO YOU SEE WHAT YOU MADE ME DO?!". This has been true during Red Terror, this has been true during USSR times, it's been true in the 90s and it's true right now.
When I first hear about this interview I assumed the Kremlin had hired Tucker as a mouthpiece. Now that I've watched it, I think he genuinely wanted to be seen as a serious big boy journalist. Which leads me to wonder just how he saw this interview going.
Putin later said in a state TV interview that Carlson didn't ask difficult enough questions.
I love how the pro-Putin shills online were acting like Tucker's interview was going to be big, instead it became a dumb joke.
As a Russian I would say that you listened to this piece of crap for 2 hours, Russians have been listening to this for years
And most of you enjoy it and repeat after him
@@MementoMori-ve3sq most people just don't care, it's like an Italian strike
WELL We Brits/are with our Nato armed forces are gathered in Poland this weekend, to let Putin know, to not even think about invading Poland, again.
Another nice Otto quote: "I must protest that I would never seek foreign conflicts just to go over domestic difficulties; that would be frivolous" - 1862
Putin instead tries to suppress his inner democratic powers (which protested several times in the past against him) and declare martial law basically. If you can put your critics into jail by showing up with just an empty white piece of paper, you can - like in the book 1984 - hold up eternal war dictatorship.
A surprise, to be sure, but a welcome one. Thanks for keeping my eyes and ears from being tainted by this mess, and enduring so that we don't have to.
Honestly I couldn’t even be bothered to watch clips of it, not to mention the whole thing
Just watch it. Get over yourself. He can't hurt you through the pre-recorded footage on the screen. Tucker did a good job.
Too late buddy, you are long gone.
Aaaand the trolls are in….
@@dogcarman
Took them longer than expected. What other commitments do you suppose they have?
The right hand isn't talking to the left. Russian propaganda has two flavors - one for Russians and one for the West. The messaging is very different between RT exported to the West and the internal news programs in Russia. The problem for Putin in this interview is that both audiences would watch. So Tucker softballed questions to coax answers that would satisfy pro-Rus Westerners. But Putin couldn't give those answers because they contradicted what he told Russians. It was a glorious lose-lose. I now use reaction videos to this interview as a litmus test for who is smart enough to recognize what happened. I've unsubscribed from half a dozen channels that I was concerned were vailed pro-Rus or slowly changed positions from the beginning of the war. I'm happy to see I can stay subscribed here. Thanks for all the excellent work you do.
Tucker`s face during the interview was like he`s trying hard to hold back the fart.
Thanks for the summary.
Tucker Carlson: *Ask something to putin*
Putin: Long time ago when Lions were called Whales....
2:51 Even if it had been made, that agreement was NOT with the Russian Federation.
Bingo
They're premise is that the RF is the legal successor of the USSR.
By the same principal, the RF shouldn't have a permanent seat on the UN security council (which is in and of itself hilarious)
“I recognise that goal, it’s mine…”
I wonder if Putin realises he would be destroyed in a 1v1 verbal debate about history with some young yt historians. Would shock him
The only thing i got out of it was Putin was upset the Russian state has always been the victim. First it was the Polish and Mongols. Then it became a pity party of waaa waaa the CIA waaaa.
Putin just exposed the entire Russian state can be summed up as a 'Skill issue'
Danzig was only an excuse, Hitler clearly said that to his generals before invading Poland but the tsar knows otherwise.
This is not even the first time Putin blamed Poland for everything. Look up TIK's video about it for a breakdown. But in the context of the interview, he's referring to the post WWI wars in Eastern Europe during the breakup of the Austro-Hungarian Empire and the complete political mess that ended up favoring the National Socialists in Germany being directly or indirectly tied to Polish action/inaction.
Obviously the entire thing is making a mountain out of a molehill, but you gotta take into account that it's not trying to dissuade you from a Western POV, but rather reinforcing Putin's and, in a roundabout way, Russia's entire geopolitical history and the reason why they have to frame stuff the way they do (Supposed Denazification of a country led by a Jewish president, for instance).
Completely unrelated, I appreciate you and Lord HT putting notices at the beginning of videos that have swearing. Because it lets us know for sure that it's not something to play out loud in polite company.
Similar to how most of us love metal or rap music, but we don't play it out loud when family is visiting, or at work. Same for shitting with the bathroom door open; we all do it, but not when family is over, and not at work.
I, personally, was very offended by the obscenity! Having to be exposed to both Putin and Carlson's ASS GRAVY this early in the day is intolerable!
On the contrary, it immediately gave a sign that video is going to be a good one ;)
I truly hope this video blows up so more people can see all the bullshit in this interview.
Sadly the people that'll believe Putin will put their fingers in their ears and go "LALALALALA! I CAN'T HEAR YOU!"
is it weird that I read that in laser pigs drunk screaming voice? 😂😂
I appreciate Putin finally outright saying what I've been shouting since the Crimean anschluß: he's a poor man's Hitler without even so much as an ideology to fall back on.
"Ukrainian think of themselves as russain" cue angry screaming from my roommate's grandmother in Ukrainian.
P.s holly hell angry Ukrainian is terrifying
Well, we technically are Russian lol
Putin saying that ukrain is a province state of russia is like biden saying britain is true american soil and should recognize it self as one of our stayes..
Having watched the whole interview (I recommend putting the video on 1.5x or higher speed) the historical revisionism is kinda hilarious, the later half is Putin basically dodging the responsibility of declaring war on Ukraine by saying everyone else didn't play ball, therefore it is all these other country's fault.
Putin does a lot of lying by omission, which btw is what Tucker rants endlessly about in his usual claims about how we're all being lied to.
So, Putin omitted a lot of history that would make his position look bad and I mean a LOT is omitted.
Even the thing about Poland "starting WW2" omits things like German demands (they didn't just want Danzig, Germany expected Poland to say no as well), also about how the USSR simultaneously invaded Poland by agreement with Germany.
Anyway, Putin is running a pokerface strategy where his hand is crap and thus he has to bluff everything. All of his interview is about showing that he is in a strong and legitimate position, which being a bluff, means he is in a weak and illegitimate position.
👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻
RE: the claim that Poland started WWII
Given that Putin sees himself as Stalin, Jr., and Stalin had already agreed to split Poland with Adolf, and were co-belligerents, invading Poland from the East a mere two weeks after Germany did from the west, he HAS to justify the Soviet participation in the invasion of Poland.
I’m glad I found this, I could only find news reports and right wing media on it.
Long ago in a distant land, I, Aku, the shape shifting master of darkness unleashed an unspeakable evil, but a foolish Samurai warrior wielding a magic sword stepped forth to oppose me!
Great show , nicely put , not too long , funny as well, thanks.
I will subscribe
We mostly agree, but I think you missed a theme. Tuktuk (I am so stealing that) was pushing putin to say that NATO enlargement was the main reason for war whereas putin was pushing the 'most of Ukraine is really Russia' narrative. NATO enlargement was presented at most as a contributing factor, but more so as a symptom of Ukrainian nationalism.
All the reasons given for this war just don't make sense. I still don't know what they're trying to achieve. Although I guess that's a common theme of war in general.
To be quiet honest, by watching the interview, it became quiet clear why the war occurred and what putin is trying to achieve. Putin is an angry russian boomer who wants the glory days back. He wants Russia to be relevant again, he wants Russia (and himself) to be so strong that it cannot be sidelined, and quiet honestly he sees Russia as a victim of social pariahism (which is true whether you believe warranted or not).
Putin is behaving more like Kaiser Wilhem, not Hitler. Both Putin and the Kaiser seeking/demanding respect from the established global order
It's a crazy dictator who thought he could get away with grabbing all of Ukraine in a few days to a few months at most. That's all there is to it. Sometimes the simple answer is the right answer. If he didn't want Ukraine to join NATO, he could've stopped at annexing Crimea.
As russian its funny to see reactions on this from other countries. We been listening to this shit from 2014 and its been crazier and crazier year by year.
Hello, west ukrainian bandera SHIT!
How is Zelensky doing? He spoke Russian all his life, and after February 24 he began to pretend that he did not know it and did not know it. He said that he would stop the war in eastern Ukraine, but he did not stop. Didn't even try
For you, the war began on February 24, and for the people of Donbass on February 21, 2022. And it began with large artillery attacks from Ukraine
@@schlangen7889 He did try stop the war. Heavy weapons were beeing moved from there and feb 21 do you mean video of some hut in forest that they said to be FSB Hq or border guard it was 100%.
@@frontrussian4951 если ты украинец, скажи сразу. А шо ти дурню моришся. Скажи "Я хохол" і вся стане на свої місця
Я из Донецка, и мне видней что происходило с 21 по 24
@@schlangen7889for people of Donbass it started in 2014 with Girkin and his friends in Slovyansk, tovarisch
Russia also blamed Georgia for bombing Tskinavli (It's own people for no reason), de facto "South Ossetia" This guy beats Zelensky 10 times as a comedian.
Thanks!
Thank you so much
You're very welcome. Very informative. I'm passing it along to others😊
I still cannot fathom how far gone the people making positive comments under Tucker's video must be... for anyone to say "omg so true" when Putin says WW2 was Poland's fault... 😂
They’re fascists and neo-Nazis. Also some tankies.
I doubt any of them had the intellectual capacity to actually watch this kind of an interview. Probably can't get even through first 2 minutes when Putin starts his alternate history monolog.
Luckily this manistic prick doesn't understand his audience.
Here are a few key things to remember: one, a channel's owner can moderate comments. Two, there are businesses you can hire that use large language models coupled with "acquired" accounts to falsify audience investment. Three, extremists have always existed and are never reasonable. Combine all that and more, and you get comment sections like that.
One thing worth mentioning which might be quite scary if you think about it, is that majority of Americans do not know or care about WW2 history that much beside what happened in the theatres of war that directly involved Americans. So for a lot of people Putin's version is going to be now the defacto story of how WW2 started. A lie told a thousand times becomes a reality.
6:00 The writing on top of the bridge tower says: Yana, I Love You!
Don't know who Yana is, but it is important!
...Must be a swell lass, if she deserves climbing on top of this thing.
2:20 Putin clearly stated he was talking about GDP in terms of PPP. You must have missed that part. Per World Bank statistics, he was absolutely correct. Russia overtook Germany as the largest economy in Europe in terms of PPP.
"Russia's leaders were responsible for the dissolution of the USSR" - Putin
Well...yes, but not exactly how he meant it I don't think.
The notion that Ukrainians do not exist as a district group from Russians is nonsensical, and Ukrainians could easily claim the same thing about Russians. While there is truth that they have a common origin as East Slavic people, the point at which they start to diverge is around the same time the Normans conquer Anglo-Saxon England. If the Russians and Ukrainians are not distinct people groups (albeit on sort of a language continuum) then neither are the Spanish different from the French, or the Dutch from the English or Germans.
But I think more significantly the whole notion that not have a historical state removes your right to self-determination is nonsense. It is the logic of Hapsburg era imperial Europe. Before the mid-19th century there was never an Italian or German state, no Finnish nation state, no Croatia, no independent Norway. This does not mean these people did not have rights to form states of their own.
One thing about Lukashenko's photo next to the map - Transnistria is already occupied by russian troops and the arrow shows an attack from transnistria towards Odessa, not the other way around. Don't get me wrong, if russia somehow manages to annex the whole of ukraine it will probably also invade the republic of moldova, it already occupies the region of transnistria and can influence moldovan politics to a certain point (sponsoring politicians and bribing voters, also broadcasting propaganda to the russian minority who lives there), it can also start small conflicts in transnistria whenever it wants so its already set up for a potential invasion (significant russian minority they can claim is oppressed by the moldovan government and russian troops present to arm rebels or just launch attacks while pretending to be "rebels fighting against opressive government").
That russian oppression shit backfired so hard in Ukraine because im pretty sure Russian-Ukrainians hate russia more than ethnic Ukrainians do
I am Russian, I am from Crimea. I currently am mostly on the Ukrainian side as lets just say a lot of evidence is on that (while the other side is mostly anecdotal evidence). I cannot believe that Putin dare say that Poland started ww2, cause it sounds like ignorance like saying USSR saved the baltic states or saying USSR saved Poland.
Stay safe then.
Before i watch this..
I watched about 5 minutes of the interview. I just happened to catch the part where he blamed Poland. I laughed/cried and switched it off.
I can't even.
He didn't "blame Poland". He explained what was happening, although that topic requires hours of conversation. Poland made mistakes regarding their relationship with Germany prior to WW2, there is simply no denying that. Their refusal to cede territory that they took from Germany after WW1, where mostly Germans lived was also a mistake. They had no reason to hold on to those lands and risk war. They overestimated their allies and underestimated Germany.
@@ironfreddy3192 Good to see the old 2014 propaganda accounts are still going
@@jackster2568
If telling yourself that helps you sleep at night, then go for it.
@@ironfreddy3192 It most definitely does, it's always funny to see that most of the accounts advocating for Russia are as old as the Euro maidan.
@@jackster2568
My dude, I was 16 then.
The only thing I knew about that whole situation was that Natalia Poklonskaya is hot.
Hi, very nice video. May I ask for the source of Russiskaja Gazeta statement regarding Gorbatschev and NATO expension? I would like to read/hear the Interview.
Carsons interviw was not done for us who can think for ourrself, it was done for the MAGA public. Who honestly cant listen to an argument that is longer than two sentences and who love to one line puncher to throw themselfs with.
It wasn't even done for them. They don't care about historical claims, if it was for them Putin would've just called Ukraine gay