Debunking the Viral Gun Control Propaganda: Why the Swiss Love Their Guns More Than Americans
Вставка
- Опубліковано 16 гру 2023
- 📲 Subscribe to @ColionNoir Here: bit.ly/3OTkrgB
Johnny Harris is a popular UA-camr known for producing engaging mini-documentaries on his channel. I've watched quite a few of them.
Recently, he released a viral documentary titled "Why The Swiss Love Their Guns (More Than Americans)." While I found his claim hard to believe, I decided to give it a chance.
However, after watching this video, which is admittedly well-done, this documentary is just a thinly veiled, passive-aggressive hit piece against the Second Amendment in America masked as a documentary.
So, now I have to debunk it.
Exclusive Holiday Drop Of Blackout Wireless In Ear Hearing Protection With Bluetooth By AKT1 (Last restock before holidays)
➡️ bit.ly/2CHLudt
Join Our 2A Membership Club here on UA-cam and get these perks:
➡️ www.youtube.com/@colionnoir/join
Join MY Exclusive 2A Advocacy Text List while AUTOMATICALLY being entered in our monthly 2A Giveaways
➡️ bit.ly/3FFLHJi
Get UnApologetically 2A Content In Short-Form On UA-cam & Help Protect The Second Amendment
➡️ua-cam.com/users/colionnoirsho...
FREE BOOK - If I Only Had One Concealed Carry
➡️ www.mrcolionnoir.com/start-here/
Looking to help further our Pro Constitution, Pro 2A message, donate below:
www.MrColionNoir.com/donate/
UnApologetically 2A Content Content On Other Platforms:
Twitter - / mrcolionnoir
Instagram - / colionnoir
Facebook - / colionnoir
Gab - gab.com/ColionNoir
Truth Social- truthsocial.com/@ColionNoir
UA-cam Shorts - ua-cam.com/users/colionnoirshorts?...
#2ANews #ColionNoir #ThePewPewLife #PewPewLife - Розваги
Swiss Gather With Guns: “So beautiful!”
Americans Gather With Guns: “Domestic terrorists!!!”
Right?! I love the the 2nd. It's peaceful and one of the best stress relief therapy PERIOD!
That also applies to the vast majority of _criticism_ directed at the US where those "intellectuals" make use of European countries to show how "dreamy" things are there and how "terrifyingly bad" things are here.
Well because basically everyone that owns a gun a right leaning
A.k.a. the modern Nazi party
@@victor_2216 The comedy of that is what the first things these same critical countries do when threatened; immediately arm their civilians and many with military grade weapons. i.e. Ukraine, Israel That is what happens when you realize the value of the U.S. 2nd A too little, to late.
@@victor_2216 many of them seem to have a chronic incapability of leaving common folk in the U.S. alone... must be rooted in colonialism idk ☹
gosh i WISH the NRA did HALF as good at protecting the 2nd amendment as much as anti gunners claim
I don't. I'm glad the NRA takes all the spotlight from anti gunners while GOA and FPC fly under the radar scoring the legal victories.
"I'll defeat NRA again" - Brandon- Since then 11 more states have passed constitutional carry. 🇺🇸
Is no one going g to mention that Swiss so iety is more homogenous than vitamin D milk? Is that WAY too obvious?
@@archangel0137people like you are the reason why the 2nd Amendment exists. If guns are the problem, then why are there less shootings where there are more armed citizens. The criminals know someone will be shooting back at them.
@archangel0137 if you plan is put into effect, what do you plan to do with those who say "over my dead body?"
I defend my fellow Americans and uphold and defend the constitution. I do not defend the government.
Wholeheartedly agree with u
And there you have one of the biggest differences in swiss and american gun culture. Your relationship base with your govermnet starts with distrust. Ours is the opposite. We trust our goverment and in return the goverment hands us out a rifle for free to defend the country. This does not mean btw. we wouldn't turn on a tyranical goverment. It's just not something we are assuming from the start and instead are having a bit of faith.
Are you suggesting that in America we don't have a reason to distrust our government?
@@spectre1725 "This does not mean btw. we wouldn't turn on a tyranical goverment."
Yes, it absolutely does. "Having a bit of faith" in "your" government sounds really cultish. And cults do not ever turn on their cult leaders. You are putting your life in the hands of an organisation that, for now, wants to keep you good. History shows that that can change at any time, from one day to the other.
The USA was literally founded by people who defended their people and their country AGAINST their government. It's astounding that I as a European know that, yet many Americans, like the smart sounding guy in the "documentary", don't.
As a pro gun man from outside the US, it's feels to me like this man (Johnny) knows little to nothing about gun culture even from his own country
He for sure is not a man with social skills nor does he seem to have an interest in gathering with others just for the fun of it.
no shit. his idea of gun culture is just all the murder the news pushes.
It's not only about gun culture, but about the national use of guns. You can't deny that a lot of people are not part of the gun culture your talking about in america, as if that were to be the case, the number of shootings as a cause of guns wouldn't be that high.
@@StarWarsExpert_ Do yourself a favor and analyze the type of guns used in holds up and robberies and then figure out whether those guns would not be around if gun control were stricter.
Then figure out how rogue bureaucrats and Biden himself would behave if he would absolutely be sure that we do not have access to guns. Trust him or Fauchi?
Many people would say everything he knows about guns he learned in his Lefty bubble.
I've decided that "bubble" isn't descriptive enough. He's learned everything through Virtual Reality.
Hey man, I'm a Swiss who is an SF operator in the Swiss Army. I totally agree with you on this debunking.
- We have a huge amount of guns in the country but no crimes because we respect the responsibility that goes with it.
- The problem in America isn't the guns, but rather the education of certain people and that is what the government should be focusing on.
- In Switzerland we are not a militia to protect the country but the people (which is a difference imo).
- The government in Switzerland is not entitled to any legislative decision without the people's agreement. So yes if the government was to become tyrannic we wouldn't protect this government, we would protect the Swiss people.
The problem is never the gun, it's always the person behind the gun.
Thank you for that interesting video !
Problem in America is the government has removed God. Without God people are empty. There nothing more then dust in the wind.
Thats beautifully said
Thanks for the much needed support, and truth!
Spot on
Facts brother.
I used to know Johnny Harris. When he was still a member of LDS church we served together in the same mission (Tijuana, Mexico). After the mission, we were friends on Facebook, and he posted a question about banning guns to help bring down violence. He wanted responses from both sides. I gave him mine, which was basically it wouldn't matter. I pointed to the fact of Mexico where we served still had violence, and the fact regular citizens are not allowed to have guns. Basically, my argument was evil people will always find a way to kill. After that day he unfriended me and blocked me. I was surprised and this happened i think in 2013. I dont have Facebook anymore. Every time I see his videos on UA-cam, I remember when I use to work together, he is a good person and I have nothing against him. But after he blocked me for giving me opinion basically told me he is not willing to listen to both sides. And will shut down opposing opinions out. Ever since then when people show me his videos I tell them my story and why I wouldn't trust his content because he doesn't look at all point of views.
This would actually have some credibility since Johnny mentions being an exmo. But if possible (and if you're fine with that) is that post still up, just curious.
Unfortunately there are many people like this. They want no other opinions and don't listen to facts or use logic
That dudes delusion seems to stem from communism, he's always talking about the collective, rather than the individual. Such people have serious mental problems, like voting democrat.
It's similar to a lot of ex-mormon personality changes when people leave the LDS faith. People are so invested that when they leave they often become vindictive toward the church and think they know more about everything else now that they figured out the church isn't true.
I grew up LDS and left, and I think that mindset is stupid. The documentary he posted isn't overtly anti gun, but it has that same holier-than-thou flavor that I see daily here in Utah from people that think they know everything now that they've "opened their minds" past religion.
It's just more talking and virtue signaling dogwhistles so he can feel like a journalist and social pariah for the people he's pandering to, nothing will ever change unless people start doing things instead of making B.S. art pieces to try and make other people change instead.
I watched his video about leaving the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints. He lost a lot of credibility in my eyes with how he misrepresented many important parts of the church. This video cements my view that he is well intentioned but far from objective. I wish he could use his platform for more unbiased reporting because he does a good job in many regards
I love the inclusion of using guns to “exterminate” in reference to native Americans. How can he not know it was the government that did that not individual citizens with their personal guns
You understand that the US Government once put bounty on native Americans, they were literally killed indiscriminately and scalped for money. Please be better and actually learn your early America history from an actual historian. And yes, guns were literally the weapon of choice to kill Native Americans. Have a great day.
As If native americans didnt "exterminate" with axes and bows 💀
@@DarkMark-cf1ec actually they were 100% peaceful utopia and no one every argued or died and their water fountains were filled with Gatorade
@@bobhalter9934LMFAOOO
😂😂😂😂😂😂ONG
Hi from Switzerland, former Sgt from the Swiss Inf, that was our standard issue assault rifle, not a maschine gun. we get a standard issue rifle for our service, but after our service is complete we either have to buy the rifle from the military, or give it back. If we wish to buy our service rifle there are things we need yo complete before hand. The rifle while still owned by the military shoots in single, 3 round burst and full auto, after purchess it can only be fired in single shot, the others have been removed/blocked. Hope everyone has a great day
do you know if you get a collector PAE you can keep it in select fire after service?
in the US 3 rnd burst and full auto capability make an rifle a machine gun in the eyes of the law, so in the US that would be classed as a machine gun
Thanks bro for the info! I'm an expatriate Swiss guy, a former Grenadier!👊🏼👊🏼👊🏼
@@antonyg.952whats the best specialty to go for in the grenadiers ?
im not that good of a marksman im okay but nothing more so idk if i wanna be tireur d'élite
In the US, any firearm that fires more than one round with a single action of the trigger is classified by law as a "machine gun" under the national firearms act of 1934.
What you are likely trying to do is equate the "belt fed machine gun" with the legal definition of "machine gun." Unfortunately almost all laws that pertain to guns in the US are written by those that don't understand them.
Colion Noir is lawyer. He's using the US legal definition of that firearm.
He's making that documentary in the point of view of a liberal American who's really never been around guns at all. Once you take that into account it makes sense.
Left Wingers Have No Right To Call Themselves Americans Because The Policies That They Support And The Candidates They Vote For Are Anti-American.
He's 100% ignorant of American gun culture.
I found his video a few hours after he uploaded it, youtube recommended it because of course they're shoving it into people's faces, I debunked a bunch of his nonsense, got into arguments with a few people, and within a few hours all of my comments were deleted 🤣
@@DesertStateNevadawell it probably popped up in your feed because it’s gun related and you watch gun videos lol it popped up in mine to.
@@DesertStateNevada None of my comments were deleted 🤔
"I'm so used to guns being about politics and being divisive." Yeah, dude, people like YOU are the reason for that. What a goofball.
Thanks for the upload, Colion.
Him - doing what he is accusing the NRA of doing. Self-Awareness - Zero.
I wish Colion made this point in the video
@@RetroPages Right? He's going to pull a muscle stretching like that.
Goof ball
@@archangel0137 😆🤣
No, no, no...
"The Swiss only have guns to protect the government"
WRONG
We have them to protect the Swiss people, not the government. Small, but very important difference. It is a Swiss duty to be able to defend your population, not your government.
AGREE ENTIRELY. I had same thoughts. Reminds me of the quote; "A prophet from your own village will be ignored and an outsider who says the same thing will be held in high esteem".
I am 100% over the soft spoken docu-style manipulation. They speak to us like we're children, expecting us to behave the way they want.
Nailed it man.
That soft whispery voice is code that they are part of the club.
As if speaking softly implies more intelligence and reason.
He hikes in Switzerland, and smiles as he close talks into the camera. He's more connected to nature in a spiritual but not religious kind of way. He's in tune with a higher wave length than most people, especially those who have to work most weekends. If we all just followed him, nobody would NEEEEEEED guns. Hell, we wouldn't WANT guns. The woods are for hiking, not shooting.
It’s how generations of Americans were taught. Don’t think, don’t criticize. Just listen to the soft voice and believe everything. It’ll be ok 👌
"Laws that aim to disarm the public at large are precisely what turned a political argument into the American Revolution."
-David Kopel
When something is used in a way that it was not designed for, you’re going to get the wrong results. Guns are dangerous weapons which are designed to KILL, or to cause serious injury, if you’re lucky enough. They aren’t designed for killing innocent people and school kids, and they aren’t designed for killing people in supermarkets, shopping malls and public places. But this is what happens in the US every single day.
The only people who should have access to guns are the military, special law enforcement and licenced individuals (eg. shooting clubs, farming/hunting). You can’t just have access to firearms for no valid reason. If people are given access to guns without a valid reason, the guns will be misused and people will get killed
In Switzerland, guns are being used for a valid reason - shooting competitions and hunting. That’s why they don’t have a gun violence problem. In the US, everyone has the right to own a gun, regardless of who they are, which is MADNESS!!! Like I said above, if something is used in a way that it was not designed for, you’re going to get the wrong results. That’s why thousands and thousands of people are killed by guns in the US every year, and it’s not meant to be that way
Lastly, let’s not forget that the US is the only country on earth where people literally have unfettered access to every kind of firearms you can imagine. To this day, many Americas still believe (crazily!) that owning a gun is the most effective way to protect themselves. Well, let’s look at this this for a moment. If arming everyone with a gun makes society a safer place, then America would be the safest country on earth. But it’s not. America isn’t even on the top ten list of safest countries. That tells you all you need to know.
What does every shooter have in common? They were all able to get a gun. So, access to guns leads to gun violence. The solution to gun violence? Ban them all. If nobody has a gun, then nobody can shoot. Problem solved.
@@archangel0137 really long winded way of saying you like to relinquish your rights, so go somewhere where you can do that :)
@@archangel0137
Switzerland has a largely homogeneous population, and DOES NOT HAVE public officials who actively promote class warfare.
If the gun death statistics in the U.S. were to exclude Philly, Chicago, Detroit, New Orleans and L.A.(all metro areas with democrat local governments, btw), the U.S. would rank 189th globally in gun deaths.
@@louisbecker5941
You can't speak factually to them, it hurts their brain and then they get angry at you for them being stupid.
@archangel0137 then let's also eliminate Freedom of the Press, since it's also being used by a minority of people in ways it wasn't meant to be.
I’m glad we have Colion to rebut these ridiculous people
Harris' argument basically boils down to "collectivism good, individualism bad." Where have we heard that argument before?
Dude went all across the world to make some low key anti-2A nonsense 😂😂
I found his video a few hours after he uploaded it, youtube recommended it because of course they're shoving it into people's faces, I debunked a bunch of his nonsense, got into arguments with a few people, and within a few hours all of my comments were deleted 🤣
😂😂😂😂 for real
Nothing "low key" about. It was 100% Liberal BS, straight up, anti-gun propaganda.
Bloomberg probably financed the trip.
Johnny makes any excuse to go to Switzerland.
My fellow American. Thank you and I'm blessed you are helping hold up the truth
Spot on Colion. Johnny certainly has a flare for the dramatics... It's interesting that he misled his viewers to believe that it was the people that slaughtered Native American Indians and not the military of the government.
Keep calling out the BS!
'Smallpox' has entered the chat.
Wow, that was hardcore, @@FirstLast-vr7es
The people as members of the military did. Militias did, too.
@@fleetstreet11 Military led operations...by far.
The problem with the government giving you a gun, is when they decide to take them away. Private ownership of guns is essential to our liberty.
Though I would still have no argument should the government ever decide to provide me with more arms and ammunition than I currently possess.
I would even consider accepting a tax credit for the expense of arming myself and my loved ones. At the very least, no government should tax it's citizens for exercising their second amendment.@@BU1Lander
The swiss gov issues the firearms and allows a vast majority of them to xfer to private status after the person has finished their mil service
The swiss gov issues the firearms and allows a vast majority of them to xfer to private status after the person has finished their mil service
@@konnorj6442That's one gun, of the government's choosing. Maybe two if they are issued a handgun, also of their choice, not the individual. After that, they still don't get to use them like the US. You heard him talking about only shooting at ranges and not in the woods or basically not even for fun. Just at the range with other people.
100% Propaganda. I was like hey this isn't bad, and then 1/4 of the way through I'm like 'fuck you'.
Maybe he should have stayed where he feels “safe” 😂
Dude I literally did the same. Cheers
Same
Yep
Based
What people sometimes forget, our gun laws are pretty strict.
Yes you get handed a gun when you serve in the military, but if you want to keep that gun you need a gun ownership permit which includes a background check.
You also don't get a carry permit unless you're a:
- Hunter/Gamekeeper
- Policeman
You're only allowed to use a gun on your own property (safety considerations!) or at a shooting range.
You're also not allowed to store ammo and guns in the same place, eg. keeping a loaded pistol in your drawer = no go.
Guns and ammo need to be stored "behind 2 locked doors".
As for defending yourself, yes you theoretically can use a gun but unless the other guy is armed as well you're going to jail. Shooting an unarmed person even in self defense gets you jail time.
In the end, you can't really compare Switzerland to the US, when it comes to poverty and social security Switzerland is leaps and bounds ahead of the US.
The trust in the government is also a lot higher here.
The issue in the US is though that fixing the socio-economic issues would mean voting for the guys that might "fix" your gun laws so you're stuck between a rock and a hard place.
I just wanted to add. You mentioned that Switzerland is leaps and bounds ahead of the US in dealing with poverty and homeless. They also only have to deal with a population of one of US's largest cities. That is a big difference.
@stevegibsonii3910 And, like a lot of other countries running down America, their population is largely ethnically homogeneous. And Switzerland is hard to get into. It is a police state of the sort that other governments drool about.
You got that last part a bit incorrect there. The only way to "fix" our gun laws would be to repeal most of them so they don't infringe in the rights of law abiding citizens. Some of those who would actually do that are the same that would have no problem fixing many of the other issues. When the handouts stop they will get hungry and want shelter. They will either get a job, end up in prison (for the hopes of a free ride) where they should have a mandatory job to earn funds for their necessities, or get sh0t trying to steal.
Though, I do have a problem that some prisons/jails are privately owned for profit businesses.
@@nomadmarauder-dw9re I grew up and live in Zürich Switzerland and when I was in middleschool 44 out of 48 students in my class were either immigrants or children of immigrants, we only had 4 students with 2 swiss parents (including me) and all the students in our class combined could speak over 20 different languages, it was just a regular public school but al classes combined had students from Portugal, Italy, Germany, Albania, Bosnia, Serbia, Armenia, Croatia, Turkey, Sri-Lanka, India, Lebanon, Syria, Netherlands, Spain, dominican republic, Ethiopia, Eritrea, Nigeria, Taiwan, China, Vietnam, Kosovo, Macedonia, Russia, Romania, Morocco, Saudi Arabia, Iran, Kurdistan, Ghana etc etc so idk about the homogeneous part, in the countryside yes but most of the "bigger" cities (especially Geneva and Zürich) are melting pots of cultures and nationalities, for example yesterday I ate a Dürüm at the local Kebap joint and I heard at least 6 different languages being spoken at the tables around me in like 15-20 minutes.
Add to that the fact that Switzerland has 4 different national languages and over 20 different swiss german dialects within an area around the size of Maryland, I don't see Switzerland as all that homogeneous, if you mean that most Swiss citizens are of european descent you are right but is it really homogeneous when all those Europeans come from different countries with different cultures speaking different languages ?
For example I can drive to Italy in less than 3 hours and their mentality, language and culture is completely different from Swiss people even though we are neighbours we couldn't be any more different, japanese or american people are closer to Swiss people than Italians in terms of mentality and culture so just because we're both european countries with mostly european populations ethnically speaking (even though Italian ethnicity is only partly European) doesn't mean we're similar in the slightest and that goes for all of Europe. That's why it's weird when I hear Switzerland referred to as a homogeneous population because it's only somewhat homogeneous in terms of ethnicity but not at all in terms of language/culture, alot of americas seem to think that "mostly white population = homogeneous population" because that makes sense in the US where all the white people speak the same language and grow up with more or less the same culture but it doesn't make sense when those white people all speak different languages, have different mentalies and can't even relate to each other at all. If a russian, a Scott, a spaniard and a swiss person are in the same room would you say it's a homogeneous room just because they're all white europeans ? Even though they have nothing else in common with each other ?
And what do you mean by police state ? The police force here is pretty small and mostly unarmed, only like 0,3% of the national BIP goes to the military and I've never experienced a shortage of freedoms or police brutality of any kind, I didn't feel any more free during my time in Providence, Rhode Island.
It's also not that hard to get into Switzerland, for example my brother works as a teacher at a refugee camp and there's like 8 year old children who fled their home country (sometimes on a different continent) alone or with their siblings without their parents knowledge and even they get in, or at least most of them. Literal pre-schoolers get in without even speaking a word english, french or german. I do think Switzerland is somewhat strict with poor refugees from outside Europe but compared to alot of other European countries it's pretty open.
@@benjaminbronnimann3966 If your assertions are true, where are the Swiss minorities? Anytime I see anything about Switzerland everybody is white. The guy in the doco isn't, but he isn't Swiss.
Thing in America: >:I
Thing in Europe: :O
"inalienable rights"...can someone tell me why all the 'educated' people can't understand such a simple phrase..."Rights that are not transferable or capable of being taken away or nullified". It is so annoying to hear lawyers try to argue that we have a "Bill of privilege"
How can one have a "God given right" if they do not believe in God? They believe rights come from what man wrote on a piece of paper
@@archangel0137 Did you not watch the video? The military and law enforcement aren't going to be there if a criminal enters your home unannounced, citizens need guns to defend themselves since the government can't help them. And criminals can still get guns illegally, do you really think banning all guns will somehow stop crime?
@@archangel0137 Your conflating violence with gun violence. As gun violence is just violence that involved a gun. If we take away all the guns we will have gotten rid of gun violence. But not violence.
@@Allswagyep it’s a spambot. It’s not going to reply to you.
@@archangel0137 guns are tools with different purposes and they can be used to kill people but in the military they also have other applications. People can use tools to harm people, just as you can use a knife or even a shovel to kill people. If the only people who have access to guns are military and law enforcement then they can just mess around with you and you can't do anything just like in dystopian societies, how are you going to stop a man with a gun violating your rights if you don't have one? People misuse guns because they are uneducated or they are criminals who obtain them illegally anyways. Switzerland doesn't have a gun problem like us because for the most part they have a good economy and one of the highest living standards in Europe, so people don't have a reason to form gangs or deal drugs. And no we don't have access to every kind of firearm you can imagine. Automatic weapons are borderline impossible to buy in the United States unless you go through an extremely lengthy process in certain states to obtain a permit to buy one, and buying one will cost you well over $10,000-$15,000 since you can only buy one manufactured before 1986, making it impossible for most average people. We aren't on the top ten list of safest countries because of inner city violence and gang warfare. You can literally live in Chicago in peace but if you go to the wrong part of town you will live in risk of dying to gang violence (or as you call it for political reasons gun violence). Banning all guns has the same effect as banning drugs like marijuana has had. People still sold it people still had access to it. People still have access to other drugs like cocaine or meth, but they're banned. OH! And once again who deals marijuana and coke and meth?? Gangs, same groups responsible for gun violence.
Maybe if you took a trip to St. Louis or even New York where I've seen gang violence or any city where there is economic depravity and gang warfare you would realize what's the problem. This idea you keep spreading is because you never have taken a step into what the real world is. People in these places are fighting for their lives on the daily, and instead of trying to help people who are in poverty and struggling we squabble over what restrictions to put on law abiding citizens with guns. Great job we're doing in this country.
Hopefully you actually read and try to consider this point instead of spewing out nonsense.
I'm from Switzerland, and I like American gun culture. The reason guns are portrayed so negatively in America is because the government wants to take away your guns. Also, the society in America is a lot more unstable compared to Switzerland, which is why gun violence is a bigger problem in the US. Anyways, I support my American brothers to keep their freedom and their gun rights. God bless you
open border multiculturalism destabilizes societies - the so-called "enrichment" is the cultural dissolution of the host nation citizenry (and it's being done intentionally throughout much of the West)
I think you made a very salient point there. It's portrayed negatively because the government (which is supposed to protect and defend the Constitution) wants to take away our guns. And the media (essentially run by neo-Marxist oligarchs) keeps the fires stoked.
...and God bless you as well. Stay free, and stay safe.
So in Switzerland can any 21 year old walk into a sporting goods store and buy unlimited guns and ammunition? Even with previous (misdemeno) convictions for domestic violence or drugs posession? Or does the Government "take away their guns"? Is that strict gun control?
Someone gets it! Heartfelt greetings, sibling from another country!
Beautiful job. Thank you for standing up for all of us.
8:07 why does bro have a problem with shooting beer cans 😂
I once dated an anti-gun liberal. I persuaded her to go to the range with me so I could sight in my deer rifle and give her a chance to shoot one of my 22s. It was a small public range with no range officer. About 10 people there. We left after couple hours. After we left she couldn't stop talking about how polite, careful and helpful everyone was. She was also surprised that no one was drinking. She had grown up in an urban anti gun culture and all she knew about gun ranges were the unfounded stereotypes of beer drinking careless red necks. She also was surprised at how much skill was required to shoot accurately. She didn't run right out and buy a gun but she was more accepting of my gun ownership.
Adding to the “witchy women & blue collared men” niche
Hells yeah my guy this story needs to be everywhere !!! Tell all the liberals!!!
What you did is one off the best ways to open the eyes of those who have been deceived about gun use and ownership. Sadly, there are many anti-gun people who will refuse an invitation to go to the range.
Here is the rest of the story. I had to promise her that after we were done at the range I would take her to a nearby art museum. While there she gave me a quick kiss and said "I'll bet were the only ones here who have been shooting today." Her expression was like she had just done something naughty and had gotten away with it.@@kbrilhart
Israel citizens be loving private ownership of guns since Oct 7th 2023 - another left-leaning population group that got some red-pilling
“I, do solemnly swear that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic….”
This is part of the oath of entitlement for the US Army.
It baffles me that there are people who still don’t understand that the 2nd amendment and even the Army is meant to defend our rights from Foreign or domestic threats.
yah they aint going to defend anyone in the US. bet
I am not entitled, I am obligated. It is the Oath of Enlistment/ Office (officers).
I took this oath and, despite no longer being in the Army, I still hold true to it.
We did not take an oath to the government, we took the oath for our homeland and our people, all of them.
We simply agreed to allow the government oversight, as long is it is in the interest of America. If this agreement would subvert our oath, it is our duty to break that agreement, in the interest of The United States and its people.
Yes sir
Even members of the Postal Service take that exact same oath. I know I did, and I think that all Federal employees do too.
As someone who lives in a country with very strict gun laws (Brazil), I tell you: don’t accept any “reasonable “ gun laws. Because for anti gun people, reasonable means that I can only have a 38 revolver, a 380. Acp pistol, a shotgun or a 22. Lr for home defense (you have to pick one, and the mighty .22 can’t be semi-auto 🤡 ), and I have to somehow PROVE to the federal police that I legitimately need a firearm.
That all started with “reasonable “ restrictions back in the 90s. That’s how it starts, death by a thousand cuts.
And then, tyranny like Venezuela, we can not fight back because of that
I hate when people bring up suicide when talking about guns. Like what do you want to do ban tall buildings?
When you only hang out with people afraid of weapons you soon see weapons not as tools for self defense but as instruments of terror.
" We have a problem with gons in this country, we do not have a problem with people pulling triggers??? "
Big reason we dont have firearms education in the country is that teaching firearms related material at school automatically disqualifies a school system from recieving federal aid.
Curious, when was that implemented in government? I was always curious why schools didn't, or couldn't promote firearm safety
@@bcpratt6979I dont think that is real, some schools have shooting clubs and compete. The school system I worked at in the past had an air rifle range and team that competed, rhey had to teach firearm safety.
yeah, bullshit. Almost every JROTC program has a gun safety program and a rifle range.
@@redwolfexrYeah but ROTC might be counted as a seperate thing due to its link with the military.
@@flexinclouds I want to see the legal citations from the OP.
To be fair, I am not a big supporter of gun safety being a mandatory class - but I don't have an issue if rural schools want to offer Hunter training, either.
I feel the biggest problem here in America is at least half the population quit teaching their children gun safety. And also teaching them what guns are to be used for and not to be used. I grew up around guns and never thought about using a gun to harm someone unless it was to protect the home, hunt or recreation.
Almost all gun crime and violent crime are committed by fatherless young men. Sooooo your half right.
There clearly not taught.
BTW most fatherless children are made through no fault divorce, child support and state support of single moms in the city.
09:01 thats a great summery
Also i want to clarify some not so importent deteils
1. The guy with the gun leaning against the wall probaply only had it there for the video. Leaning your gun against a wall is illegal
2. For the part at 17:11 (in my opinion unfortunatly) the answer is yes. The saing goes you have to be shot dead to be allowed to shoot back.
Best case the guy you shot was actually armed. And your just in for manslaughter.
Worst case you wear mistaken he wasnt armed. You can kiss your gun goodby(that was the last time you held a gun) and you get murder charges
Also as a sidenote: In some states they require a screaning to deside if you are worthy of a gun, where they will also ask you why you want a gun.
Since 2016 there is a trend if you say its for selfdefens, your likely not getting a gun
Johnny often describes his work as journalism. Lot's and lots of subtle propaganda in his "journalism". Reminds me of mainstream media A LOT.
Well he was a journalist for vox if that says anything
Johnny clearly gets funding from certain... special interests... that I surmise are largely the same as the same types of chosen people that fund the mainstream press.
doesn't he still work for mainstream media
He has the talking points down....
Journalist my ass.
He's a agent, propagandist.
The right to keep and bear arms, is not exclusive to just guns, it also includes swords, bows, axes, Spears, ect. The founding fathers used the word arms, because it would include both old, current, and future tools to be used to not only protect the country and oneself from foreign enemies, but also domestic ones.
Finally! I'm not the only one who says this!
I still think they meant cannons
@@fajile5109 You left out the word "also". It shouyld be "I still think they ALSO meant cannons." In which case, you would be entirely correct. Also, apparently it appears to be easier to buy an ACW era cannon than it is to buy most firearms, because the cannon is a black powder weapon, oh, my mistake, device.
i one up you i think if you can afford you can buy it like jets bombers Heli any thing we should be allowed you acquire f22 raptor any one ? RPG mortars CRAM what ever that's how far id take and some think it may be a bad idea but i think its all keeps itself in check . fill a room with a bunch of guys that can't fight and they will fight each other fill a room full of black belts MMA fighters and they will chill out and train together . when you know the other guy can defend himself you don't go around starting fights
It also included body armor. 2A was based on self defense rights of other cultures and they included armor in their statements of arms. It is the same here.
Protecting yourself against criminal activity is the epitome of protecting the country.
Great point. Not much of a country if it's citizens are defenseless against criminals.
That's the point . Governments love criminals . Look at what's happening in the U.S. .
There is nothing more criminal than unbridled government spending and unilaterally voting amongst themselves to raise the debt ceiling to keep doing so.
What the 2nd amendment was saying was the people have a RIGHT to organize well regulated militia. It was purposely worded this way to protect our right to assemble with arms!
Being swiss and american i can say regardless of how the country virws thier guns.. Switzerland and america is the two best places to be if anything ever bad happened in the world. But you broke the swiss video down perfectly and he obviously had an agenda to follow making it. Id love to see who funded his swiss trip. Cuz Switzerland is not cheap in any regard
3 minutes into the original video he literally says who funded his trip/sponsored the video...thanks for admitting you don't even do the bare minimum to answer your own questions.
@@Crazy123FlameI mean this pretty much sums up the video. Also the sponsor was better help an online therapy company. They recently took personal information users filled in a mental health questionnaire and gave it to social media platforms without the users consent. So great sponsor.
@@Crazy123Flame I watched both but don't remember him saying who sponsored his trip. Doesn't mean I think your just saying that. I just didn't remember. I also was mainly saying that to reference how Switzerland is expensive. And it didn't take away from what I said about him breaking down the video. I was however wrong about not knowing who funded the trip.
@@Crazy123FlameA yes better help, the company known for selling their user data without consent. In fact, much worse, Medical data.
Great video Colin! I’m from the same town in Southern Oregon as Johnny. We have a thriving/healthy gun culture here (not just shooting in the woods). We have several stellar gun clubs, lots of different types of competitions happening regulalry, heaps of camaraderie/community and we do all this safely and responsibly. Had he looked in his own backyard he would’ve found everything that he found in Switzerland and more. Johnny also claims that American gun culture is heavily politicized, while his video only adds to the politicization of guns. 🤷♂️ In the words of Colin Noir: “This is a propaganda film masquerading as a documentary.”
The biggest difference between Switzerland and the US is that Switzerland has a higher median income, lower poverty rate, strict immigration laws, and a more cohesive culture. hmm I wonder why they don't have as much crime?
They dont have a high gang population either. I believe that has a lot to do with it.
They don't have gerrymandering democrats who do backdoor tricks to maintain black slavery and servitude through underhanded loopholes they forced into the lawbooks to ensure they don't actually have to give up slavery.
Immigrants are less likely to commit crime in the USA- and most gun fanatics vote against anything to mitigate poverty- even their own.
The entire problem the gun haters complain about is driven by culture. The Progressive Democrat run cities are war zones because they celebrate depravity and have no respect for life. The suburbs and rural areas despite being armed to the teeth have crime rates lower than anywhere in Europe. Rural and suburban culture values good moral character and the rule of law.
They're also as far as you can get from the drug trafficking continents.
This guy never spent any time in ranges in the USA. The ranges ive been to & are a member of have some of the greatest sense of community, are the nicest people ive ever met, and are more diverse than the United Nations. Willful, deliberate ignorance.
All ranges in California be like: OMG, your AR/AK is too loud, you pulled the trigger more than once in a 5-second interval, you are banned! It's so sad and pathetic here.
Really awesome you've put this together. I know it's hard putting together and doing the research that makes these UA-cam videos work, so yeah, thanks a ton!
I think he would be happier if he moved his citizenship to Switzerland, and we would all be better off without him!!
My wife and I listened to this while we were driving from a couple towns away back home. Every time the "documentary" was being played, she would make snide remarks like "he's so stupid."
The woman I married didn't even know her dad had guns until after we'd been married for several years. He's a world war II veteran and didn't broadcast that he owned firearms to anybody, including his own daughters. His sons knew, and they got the guns. I got my father's guns and then traded with my brothers so that we all had the ones we wanted the most.
Guns are a wholesome activity that have brought many families together. The families they tear apart are evil, liberal(not necessarily Democrat), and already criminal.
I like how Johnny said he used too shoot shotguns at bottles in the woods, then he was saying it's his first time shooting a gun. I'm glad you covered this bs
Left wing collectivism requires the people pushing it to be disingenuous. If they came right out and said… “yeah, you will own nothing and essentially be property of the government”. Not many people would be too willing join the movement.
Any reasonable person should've been able to tell the "shooting bottles with shotguns in the woods" was a lie
Couldn't hit the like button hard enough. The breakdown was tops.
Thank you for putting together such a good response to his 2A hit piece. You summed it up much better than my comment on his video.
It struck me too, after watching Johnny's video, that he was comparing the "reality" of gun culture in Switzerland with a *narrative* about gun culture in America. I was annoyed that he hadn't visited any gun ranges in America before making his comparisons, which sounded more like pushing an agenda than furthering our understanding of the real world.
I’m thankful you say “reality” with quotation marks. Because it’s really not, it’s a narrative for us too. It’s portrayed as if we all go to the shooting competition at the beginning… I never heard of it before, it’s kind of a niche hobby really. The part on swiss history looks like he romanticised an already romanticised version of swiss history he found somewhere online. In fact, notice the lack of sources everywhere ? The only “sources” are the randoms he interviews. It’s like all the budget went on the plane tickets and fun animations, none left for research.
I don’t know about the accuracy of the American part of the video, but seeing how bad the part with Switzerland is… the reaction and comments do not surprise me.
@@matthias0054 Hahaha great to hear.. Yes not sure why but something seemed fishy... I had never heard of the Swiss all being crack shot marksmen, although I'm aware that they've made some great guns! I think you are right about their budget. I guess the piece falls into category: "infotainment" (yuck). I *do* find it odd that an independent producer, with supposedly benign intentions, would create something which feigns factuality so completely; and also inadvertently supports a political concept which aims to restrict rights of sovereign citizens...
It sounds like pushing an agenda because that's precisely what it is.
What narrative if it is what actually happens? Turn on the news and you see the school shootings n all that stuff that DO NOT happen in Switzerland
He should see the reality of gun culture where I live in the Italian Alps just across from the Swiss border. Literally all my neighbours have guns, they are privately owned, not given by the government, and we do go out in the woods to shoot. We are much more limited legally than Americans are, but we do what we do...
The same for my friends in Norway, Sweden, and Finland. Very strong privately owned gun cultures there, and yes, they go out in the woods to shoot at tin cans and other targets.
When he compared a Swiss gun range to an active warzone, I knew I was in for something.
tall tale time, that is
It just tells us that he has never been in an active war zone. Or for that matter the poorer parts of any large American city.
literally would have to live under a rock for one to think that that's what war sounds like
@@tactilecola5709 most of all I hear war and combat described as confusing. You draw up battle plans but things happen, you end up seeing guys and wondering “are those my guys?, do I shoot them.” Gun ranges are usually pretty ordered places nothing like a war zone.
I think it's a talent to pack in so much propaganda in such a short space. Doesn't work on us but evidently it works on 81 million.
I thought the Rittenhouse incident was particularly interesting. The local government/law enforcement seemed to be failing at protecting private property. A group of armed people (including Rittenhouse) came together to protect a business (the guns were to protect themselves when their lives were threatened while protecting the business). Not that different than armed security guards, but unpaid. People ask why did Rittenhouse have a gun? It was the entire constitutional right of the people involved to protect their property by forming an armed militia. The failure of the local government to do this for the people made the 2nd amendment all the more necessary. It wasn’t just Rittenhouse on trial, it was the 2nd amendment.
my thoughts exactly, thank you for voicing them
I like how in his documentary, he doesn’t investigate why there’s so much more crime in the 60’s and 70’s,
Which can be directly correlated to the teens growing up in a welfare state neighborhood. The numbers he pulls for the gun related deaths, like Colion mentions, aren’t even a fraction of a percent of the total population of America.
Agreed, the Welfare Act of 1964 passed under LBJ has destroyed a lot of people's desire to work and better themselves. Black communities had fathers in the house prior to the bill passing.
Don't forget crack! Crack is thought to have been the major contributing factor to rising crime rates in the 80's!
What's always over looked is the constitution isn't a list to tell US our rights, it's a list that tells the government what rights they have NO say over.
Well put, very well put! The Bill of Rights is Our Bill of Rights, the Peoples', not the Government's Bill of Rights! The only, Only Amendment that reads, "shall not be infringed," yet the government has infringed on Our 2A Rights more than one can count on 2 hands, by far! In Switzerland, they keep their hands off their, "essentially" 2A Rights, "No More Gun Laws, Allowed..."
I am a Swiss citizen who has served in the military and also own a gun. He represents our gun culture very well but we do also have people (although they are very rare) who go out into the woods and shoot random shit often with guns that aren’t even legal Tommy guns for example. Nevertheless we still have much much fewer gun related crimes. I personally think this is due to the fact that 95% of gun owners received proper firearms training in the military and that we have generally much lower crime rates, fewer Drug problems and no gangs. One more point that comes to mind is that it is very very hard to receive a license to carry weapons in Switzerland. Only law enforcement, active military personnel and some extremely rare cases of civil individuals that are at a high risk of personal safety are allowed to carry firearms. I do not understand why you need to be allowed to go shopping with a gun on you.
What does firearms training have to do with criminal mindset? Our problem is that our liberal government won’t keep violent criminals in prison. If you lived where I do you would want to carry a weapon when you went shopping. The adage “When seconds count the police are minutes away “ is very true.
@@Flawampuscat Professional training doesn’t necessarily relate to crimes but it does help a lot with accidents.
Gun crime here is a function of crime at large. Which is driven by socioeconomic issues for the most part.
Great video! In Switzerland, the government needs their people to have guns so it's a privilege that is encouraged. In the US, the government doesn't NEED the citizens to have guns anymore, but it remains a right of the people to potentially use against government, so it is politicized and sensationalized to get the people themselves to want to surrender that right.
In Switzerland - the people are the country.
These days - in America - the government is afraid of its people - therefore, guns have become the "focal point" of control.
The fact that he uses the word "collective" so often tells you everything you need to know about where this guy is coming from.
These people can only think in terms of classes. Marxism destroyed them
Exactly…… The hive mind. 🤖
Socialism/Communism/Marxism/Maoism. It's all garbage.
I knew you would be the best person to debunk this video. When I watched it I was laughing the entire video. Comming from someone who has watched a ton of Johnny's documentaries as well, I really hate how he painted this picture about their gun culture vs ours. It really was a huge failure on his journalistic integrity. He spent so much time with Swiss gun owners, Swiss citizens, shoting range owners but couldnt spend any time with any American ones to give their POV.
Indeed an absolute journalistic failure and calls into question his body of work in my eyes. If they deceive once, they either already have or will again in the future
Yes sir, very well said! Thank you.
Because that doesn't help his message
He researched Swiss gun culture but didn't bother to research American gun culture. What a fool!
Ngl I want the ear pro from the ad when you said you can take a phone call, the thought of being on the phone with someone while the dude at the next stall is blasting away is hilarious to me.
Never ever trust anyone that says i dont feel good around guns.... Im portuguese and ex military and i hate when people say they think people dont need guns. We need 2A here, more then ever
I love that in his documentary he mentions crime going up, and then people feel the need to defend themselves to they buy more guns and he points at the guns as bad rather than the crime rates 😂
People are buying guns because they have lost faith in law enforcement and their ability to keep criminals at bay and the justice system that isn't keeping criminals locked up.
Exactly lol like the cia distribution of crack epidemic aka crime caused by a corrupt government goes right over that dudes head
and his graphs show two different timelines 🤣
Shows his ignorance blatantly
This shows how insulated Americans like Johnny have become, it simply does not compute that the American Government could or would ever turn on its own people, and that those people might actually have to stand up and defend this country from it’s own corrupt leadership.
Saying the NRA politicizes firearms and not saying that the Democratic Party doesn’t is hilarious.
Damn, that documentary was dissected so well. Thanks Colion! You're doing important work and advocating the protection of the 2A despite it being attacked so much more than ever! You can tell that guy is trying so hard to skew facts and disguising the propaganda as a documentary, which scary enough...he did a good job doing.
"This is a 38 min gon control ad, disguised as a documentary.."
-Colion Noir
@@MR-backup And why is Johnny Harris lying or misrepresenting facts? WHY does he think individual rights are bad, and should be returned to the "collective"?
The answer is rather simple and was researched not by me, but a fellow UA-camr named Tom Nicholas.
He exposed Johnnys video about China as a paid promotion for the WEF and their stakeholder capitalsm ideology. Aka transnationalism or globalism.
He is not just making paid and not properly marked advertisement videos, but also an author for the WEF blog and promotion team.
Long story short, Americans got too comfortable with our right to bear arms being infringed, and the Swiss are constantly told that they have to have guns and its their duty to defend their country so taking away THEIR guns would be considered preposterous.
Exactly
Yeah except instead of the right to bear arms being put there by the people for the people the Swiss right to have arms are put there by the government for the people to protect the government
As soon as we replace our service rifle in switzerland, our lefty politicians will attack the swiss gun culture again and try to infringe on our rights, just a question of time. Regulations are increased all the time.
No most Guns here arent army stuff. And Swiss are in power not the goverment. So nobody can take them away. We dont have a right but we dont need it. Because we are the goverment. We are not like all the others with there fake democracy.
@@levicarpenter5509 No because here People are the goverment not some party or politicians. Thats what nobody understands. We are the only free people. We make all Laws not them. If they put on something they need to ask. If we say no its a NO. And people can bring up new Laws or rights. Normal worker can get 50'000 yes vote and bring it up for everyone to vote. Thats freedom.... Not vote a politicians that maybe does what you want.
Seems like a face-to-face debate between Colion and Johnny is in order:
-Clear up/educate Johnny on his skewed perspectives
-Examine the merits of these societies’ gun culture differences
-Juxtapose each culture over its gun-related crime/violence/death, measured per capita
-Virtually panel leading voices from both countries, both for/against?
Thank you for making this brother 🙏🏽
Thank you debunking this guy! Unfortunately, he has the mindset of most Liberal Americans...
I knew it the whole video.
I couldn't put my finger on it, since he mad some good points about prior Republic government models (providing sources) and how there is a duty clause to the 2A (which leads to healthy community), but after the ending I knew he was a snake in the grass!
The liberal mindset in America is that all guns are evil and need to be banned. Liberals in America want a disarmed citizenry. Like Communists, liberals put their faith in big government and not in God.
if you sent all the africans back to africa gun crime in the US would be near zero
Yeah, its hard to tell when they are totally still snakey, or just refuse to give away their calling card.
They will get awoken to things done corruptly and lies told. But then still want to side with the lies, because its home. Its where the elites are. A sense of belonging or just desire for it.
You see that with many of Libs. Gaming has it. Where the get censored. Find out they aren't immune. Realize a lie, but then go and try to roast amd discredit their own followers and others that keep getting it right.
Liberalism is like the Vaxxez. You need it to always be right. Sometimes it may he wrong, but you were always trying to be right...therefore you are right. Anyone that denies them and are right, got a lucky guess and really lucky they weren't harmed by not obeying the liberal mindset.
he’s got a pretty large following too lol
The big distinction between the Swiss model and the American model is that the Swiss people have guns in order to protect the government, while in America, the people have guns in order to protect the people.
A privilege granted for the protection of the government vs a right merely acknowledged by the government.
Their "gun culture" is just government servitude. We're nothing alike.
Valid point. Personal freedom for the win!
Exactly. Our system was designed of the people, for the people and by the people. If the government becomes destructive or tyrannical we have a duty and a right to change it.
And then you play his game but now against Switzerland. We are not armed to protect the government but our territories and freedom!
And to prove it, we had civil wars in the past. When government or bigger states try to stole the lead and forget that we are a confederation!
(Hoping my English isn’t to bad)
Gun don’t kill people, people kill people. 😉🇨🇭🇺🇸
Your wrong sorry. In Switzerland we are the goverment not politicians. We fucking dont care about them. We are the in power, alot of times we vote against them. And then they have to deal with it. And most Guns in Switzerland arent from the army.
Switzerland is a direct democracy so they have a lot more control over government than representative republics but largely I agree with you. Clearly it overall worked out for Switzerland though than their neighbors. Will all those guns, why do you think the NSDAP never dared invade Switzerland?
They think our way of doing things is bonkers but that's because they only know what they're told.
Holy crud -- What a great presentation!! I had just watched the 38 minute Harris vid and then saw this. Colion did a great job of boiling Harris's down to its essential arguments, debunking it step by step along the way. OK Colion, I'm now subscribed. Keep em coming!
I have euro friends that traveled here just to see with their own eyes how americans deal with weapons and they were all shocked about how everyone were so "professional" about it. They always had that impression that when we see a friend on the streets, we compliment and then show our guns to each other type of thing
Yup, similar story here. I have friends from east Asia that came here and were initially afraid of guns but after shooting the first mags, they had a big grin on their faces.
You don’t greet that way? Barbarism at its finest.
You mean people don't pull out their 1911's and touch tips? That's just bad manners.
"Are you appendix carrying, or are you just happy to see me?"
@@cherokeevolfusa2891 Tried that once. Pulled out a 2011 they blushed said I was compensating.
As a foreigner who just started going to gun ranges and shooting competitions this year, 2A folks seem to be one of the most disciplined groups here in the US.
thank you
Gun-fear mongers are afraid of the concept of concealed carry. Statistics show that people who go to the extra effort of getting concealed carry training are typically more law-abiding than police.
Noo not quite... A lot of them are amazing people, but unfortunately the loud minority cause most of the shit, unfortunately.
I'm german, so just my view from a country with very strict gun laws:
You are absolutely right about the shooting range/competition: There's no difference in the states compared with Switzerland or Germany. If you like to do this in your free time, go for it. In Germany it's even one of the few reasons you are allowed to buy a gun ("Schützenverein").
What's more strange in the states is the "everyday access" to guns, i.e.: Spontaneously buy an AR-15 at Walmart, leave them somewhere open in your house for easy access or even open carry in public. I would be kind of afraid walking through a city where every 2nd person is (or could) carry a gun.
I know one friend, who has a gun for the shooting range. Everyone else is like "No, I don't own a gun, why should i?!". That's also a key difference: Here you own a gun, cause you have a real verifiable use-case (hunting, sports, police,..) and use it responsibly, whereas in the states nearly everyone (good or bad intentions) can buy one.
Just my two cents.🤷🏽♂️
I can see how that would be concerning but majority of folks who own guns dont open carry unless its for something political like: Protesting, Hunting, or pissing off the Police to get a reaction.
You're German
This isn't the wild west, we don't all tense up and ready to draw when we see someone here. Travel to the US and your irrational fear of walking down the street will probably go away. The same way as you wouldn't purposefully go to a bad neighborhood or area in Germany is the same reason you wouldn't here in the US. If you go to a crime ridden area, there will probably be crime. That's just how things go
🇺🇸 AMERICA IS GREAT AND SO IS THE CONSTITUTION
People need free acces to guns, to be protected FROM the government
I think bundestag would've listen to these farmers faster if they were armed.
Same with protests during covid, not only german farmers, but also freedom convoy
They were called drug addicts and other bad words by the government and because government wasn't afraid of them
Gives an exact count of people supposedly killed by gun violence, and then says countless lives have been lost. What??
I don't know if you saw my comment on this Colion but thank you for responding and making a video on it.
Yoooo. Dude I like your gameplay and the commentary you put into it. Can’t wait for you to finish Bully later.
I'm so glad he did it.
I left comments to that video, similar to what Colion was saying, except (as usual) Colion said it a thousands times better!
The dude COMPLETELY blew the basic fact: the colonials ALREADY HAD a standing army: the Red Coats. Everything else that follows in his tirade is undermined by that mistake.
@@myfakeguuglaccount8307 good point!
@@myfakeguuglaccount8307He'll just argue that it wasn't THEIR standing army.
Gun Control means being able to consistently hit your target.
Everything else is just infringement.
Guys who made that video are the ones usually pushing the infringments on our human rights. "Its just common sense gun control" they say. "Its just abortion" they say "its just children on puberty blockers" its clearly not just 😡
Depends on what youre talking about. The law? Or handling a gun?
No. Being able to consistently hit your target makes You a good shooter, but it doesn't make You a good gun owner.
Gun control is being responsible for a device that has very high potential to be (deadly) dangerous.
Means for the shooter besides me on the range: as long as he handles his gun in a safe manner, I don't mind how often he misses his targets.
@SH1974 You confuse Gun Safety with Gun Control.
Gun Safety is very simple.
We were taught two word Gun Safety in my house growing up.
"Gun's Loaded"
That means muzzle down, finger out of the trigger guard and safety on.
ALWAYS treat a gun as such and you will NEVER have an accident.
"Gun Control" is when evil people want to disarm you because of what they've done to you and they fear you may retaliate with lethal force.
"SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED" There is a reason this verbiage was used in the Second Amendment to the United States Constitution.
A good case of Gun Safety failure would be Alec Baldwin's Negligent Homicide of Halyna Hutchins. (Remember her? I do!)
And of course, because he's a star, no repercussions.
So, please don't tell me "No". I understand fully what these words define.
Have a Merry Christmas.
P.S., Halyna's husband and children, won't be celebrating with her this year, not because of lack of Gun Control, but because of lack of Gun Safety.
@@Stephen_M. That might be, but I do not confuse gun control (responsible gun ownership) with shooting accuracy.
One thing is talent (and training), the other thing is discipline. A man can be a good gun owner without being a good shooter - or opposite.
That's what I tried to point out.
I wrote like 20 lines of angry *bark bark bark* but it all boils down to this:
I bet that 90% of Americans that own a gun never fired a gun at a gun range in their life.
Does the Swiss government put as much effort as ours does toward pitting their citizens against each other?
During a shooting match I had issues with my shotgun. Poor maintenance on my part.
Four of my fellow competitors came over to help get my shotgun running reliably again.
THAT is the sportsmanship of the shooting community.
My fellow competitors WANTED me to do well.
I have met lots of good people during shooting matches.
Hey bro, are you sure they didn't help get your shotgun up and running just so THEY could shoot cans and bottles with it! LOL!
@@shawnfinlay4952 Absolutely certain they had no desire to shoot my shotgun.
Remember, this was during a SHOOTING MATCH!!
No cans, no bottles.
Clay targets and metal targets. Plus a Texas Star.
I commented exactly this on his video - I guarantee he has never interacted with the American gun community, only going off what he sees on the news. He deleted it.
@@MaxCruise73 Yeah I know they weren't. I was just poking fun at people who think American gun culture is people going out to shoot at bottles and cans.
As a former anti-gunner I want you to know that informative videos like these really can make a difference so thanks Colion!
Thanks for having an open mind! We need more like you
Same here. Was anti-gun...then I became an adult.
glad i figured it out before I started voting @@geekofsteal
That makes two of us
Same boat for me 😅
Its pretty simple you can not make sense to a Liberal.
Johnny is censoring comments that criticise his lies
"The sound of this gunrage is like a war zone"
*one person shooting a rifle😅
A small correction: The shooting competition wasn‘t long range, or at least isn‘t considered long range in Switzerland. It is on a distance of 300 meters, which is the basic rifle qualification range for Swiss soldiers. Every service member has to qualify annually on 300m (or 25m for higher NCOs and officers, since their personal weapon is a pistol).
Just some nice to know things about those competitions/ qualifications: Each 300m range (partially funded by the defense department) will host several competitions over the summer where you can just walk into the building, grab the necessary ammo and shoot your qualification. If you fail to do your qualifications you will be fined (iirc first time will be about 200$, second time 400$ and then it will gradually rise).
So a lot of people are going to the range because they are legally obligated to do so.
Well that's a good thing. Don't let em reduce standards like here. Basic training is joke here now, they don't even have to be able to do a pushup the right way. Military & schools actively creating more useless and ignorant people.
Actually you are wrong it was long range. In no world is 300m a short range.
@@SooSmokie There is also intermediate range inbetween long and short range. 0-300m is the range every Swiss soldier is trained on. Everything beyond it is only for specialized marksmen and snipers. So no, 300m is not considered long range in Switzerland.
But most aren't.
Yawn... Long range? Marine rifle qual when I was in, was KD 500 on the Island with irons. 🙄
Fending off a tyrannical entity or hostile foreign power is exactly the same as protecting yourself against a criminal thug:
Someone trying to force their will on you without your consent. Having proper and effective tools enables you to say "No"
Not the same at all...
1. Risking your life for what insurance can pay back is ridiculous.
2. Your houses are made of cardboard. Shooting at the intruder sounds fun, but not for the neighbour getting hit. Self defence with a weapon when a life is threatened is understandable. Problem, very often the gun can cause the unsafe situation. Or the shooting is absolutely not justified...
3. Americans tend to believe that they are all Rambo, able to do whatever with a weapon because they saw it online. Even cops trained for school shooting cases didn't dare to enter Uvalde's school because of the AR-15.
Unless one is trained, a weapon is a very dangerous tool.
4. Switzerland sees guns as a defense against external threats. Self defence isn't the role for guns. That's the job of the police. Why is there less violence? Because there is less poverty in most of developed countries than in the US: And the countries that are getting poverty issues start to have violence.
If the US wants to be a safer place, there are major mentality shifts to have. No guns are not THE solution against violence.
@@fabr5747 "didn't dare to enter Uvalde's school because of the AR-15."
The number of incidents where cops willingly rush into active shooter situations with just pistols, not knowing what the shooter is armed with, far outweighs this one incident. Uvalde was piss poor leadership, not fear of the magically deadly AR-15.
@@fabr5747 1. everyone who cites insurance is just signaling they aren't a real adult or have never experienced any hardship at all. You know insurance doesn't make you whole, right? Pretty much never. It takes ages, which depending on what has been taken/destroyed can ruin you, it has a deductible (which can be thousands and thousand of dollars for high value items...like everything in your house), it will permanently raise your premiums, and the insurance company may contest or deny your claim/the values involved. My girlfriend was hit by a motorist using commercial insurance, that company denied the claim because the vehicle was private use, my gf has uninsured motorist coverage...still cost her a grand. And that was for a minor accident. A grand for a minor incident, it scales out of control quickly.
2. You're an absolute moron if you think a gun is escalating someone being in your home. Thieves aren't idiots, they will enter when you're not around. Anyone entering your home while you're in it intends violence or a sexual attack.
I don't think you understand the point, but it doesn't matter, you don't deserve to @@fabr5747
As a European he also glosses over the fact that the USA is pretty big and flat so if you live remote the police isn’t there within 30 minutes while in Switzerland it is along with the fact that Swiss police is much better at investigating and has more resources to put in such an investigation
On Dec. 29, 1890, the 7th Cavalry, who had come to confiscate its firearms "for their safety and protection," killed as many as 297 Sioux Indians at Wounded Knee in South Dakota. The slaughter began after the majority had peacefully turned in their firearms.
The Framers understood two things: human history, and human nature. They understood most people throughout history have lived under some form of authoritarianism, or tyranny, i.e., a threat of force. The Framers also understood human nature enough to know there would always be those who'd seek to impose their will on others - by force if necessary. Any government that seeks to disarm its responsible law-abiding citizens is a government to beware.
Something tells me Mr. Harris did not go around to American shooting competitions and ranges to ask them about their culture.
He merely made this video to claim his trip to Switzerland as a business trip.
More importantly, Switzerland doesn't let pharmaceutical companies advertise antidepressants to people.
I literally just watched that "documentary" a couple hours ago (and thus right before this video). This dude: "OMG sounds like a war zone!" Nope, that's a range. You're literally at a shooting range. What did you think was happening there? Also, American gun culture? Let's go to Switzerland!
Exactly!
When he said that I knew he was a snowflake that was going to be as hyperbolic about everything, firearm related, he touched in that gon control ad, I mean, "documentary".
I'm from the Netherlands and went on vacation to the US recently, and decided to go to a gun range, curious just to experience what it's actually like.
Now maybe Colorado is different, but compared to how it tends to be described, I didn't see any of that. Everyone was super kind (albeit the instructor was super serious, which he kinda should be), respectful and did absolutely everything to be safe. They were just happy to introduce us to something they really enjoyed and wanted to make sure we were safe and had fun there.
Likewise, while touring through 9 states, we never really noticed anything like guns being politicized or anything. Strangest things we saw were lawyer ads absolutely everywhere, portion sizes being about double what we expected and medication being sold in Walmart that doctors here wouldn't even let you touch unless you have some serious illness. (oh, and churches in Utah all looking the same, I guess even churches there are franchised)
Colorado is indeed different, we get a lot of tourists and are pretty welcoming for the international crowd, but honestly our ranges are kinda like everyone's. So long as you don't scare anyone, you're good.
And as far as the churches in Utah all looking the same, most of Utah is majority Mormon-so their churches are all patterned after one another.
What range did you go to?
What parts of Colorado did you go to? I live in Pueblo, 2 hours South of Denver
@@userJohnSmith Yeah at first the guy at the counter didn't notice we weren't from the US because I don't have much of an accent, but once he noticed that we are (kinda hard to hide when you show a Dutch passport) he became extra friendly, in general I've noticed folks in the Mid-West love meeting foreigners
I went to Shoot Indoors Buckly in Aurora, which was closest to where we were staying
Got to try a .22, an AR-15 and a 1911 (I love history so especially the latter I really enjoyed)
@@marshallbrumfield Friend's parents live in Parker, near Denver so we explored around that area, spent a good bit of time at Rocky Mountain National Park, went to Gunnison, which was absolutely stunning, and drove through the south-west of Colorado on our way to the Grand Canyon
Do you happen to know where you can buy Tommyknockers root beer? We happened to try it in Denver, and wanted to buy some at the brewery but there was only super expensive paid parking
Churches in Utah aren’t franchised. Most of that religion’s buildings don’t have the character in their design as other religions do because they keep them simple and functional. The temples in Utah on the other hand are stunning.
This is not a debate 2A is a god given right.
Basically, one country has military conscription, the other country does not have it (in peace time).
My heritage is Swiss. My great-grandfather came over in the 1800's. And yes, my family heritage in a large part is about guns. God bless the USA, God bless the 2nd Amendment!
There are reasons folks came here from elsewhere, and it bothers me to say the least that folks are making this Nation represent the things folks came here to get away from.
Mine as well. I have family I go back and visit over there (Bern). They do love their guns over there, old K31s on the walls. Not sure I'd say they love guns more than us though..
Thank you for pointing out that the OVERWELMING majority of gun crimes are being committed by people holding them illegally in cities will strict gun contol.
because criminals prey where with wild abandon where they are least likely to encounter repercussions from intended victims
This is what we, law abiding citizens, keep telling the government here in Canada every time they ban something. (most recently, folding knives you can open one handed); law abiding citizens who responsibly practice with weapons isn't the issue, but it is who is being affected the most by these laws.
Also, I had a cop tell me once we, the citizens, don't need weapons, because if there's a home invader or we are otherwise endangered, we should barricade ourselves in a room, and call 911.
I retorted, "Sounds like a plan; except it takes you guys at least an hour to respond, at which point we need the coroner instead."
He didn't like that, but had no argument for it either. I'm sure someone else does.
You are wright,guns don't kill PEOPLE, PEOPLE kill PEOPLE.
@@nephicus339 All part of the plan ...
We can be educated or we can be armed but we can't be both or that would be bad for capitalism and the system ;)
I own a dozen firearms... Not one of them has snuck off of the gun rack, or out of the safe to commit a crime. Law abiding citizens do not commit crimes, but criminals only need 1 weapon. If they cannot obtain a gun, they will kill with knives (as they do in the UK)
Thank you. I scroll-barred thru this because of it's production value and provocative setup but you summed it up beautifully in the phrase we have "the same shit, bro"
I’m from Switzerland and I’m not writing here to criticize Americans and how you handle your guns but I’d like to give some added information about the way it is in Switzerland because there may be some misunderstandings regarding that.
1. Obviously not everyone owns a Gun in Switzerland only certified gun holders which have to obtain a license or guys and girls that go to the army. which is a small percentage of the overall population since a lot of people simply don’t want to go to the army or they are not capable either physically or mentally.
2. Everybody that is in the army receives either the SIG 550 assault rifle or a Glock 17 depending on which department you’re in. But when you take them home from the army that doesn’t give you the right of owning ammunition unless you have the license for it which you have to acquire separately and has nothing to do with you being in the army.
3. The guns at home have to be stored unloaded and the guns breech has to be stored separately so that even if there’s ammo at home accidents can be avoided. Sadly every few years some people don’t follow that rule and deadly accidents happen.
Ammo for people serving in the army would be provided after being drafted in a case on an invasion you’re not supposed to have ammo at home to be ready instantly.
4. Using the gun for self defense in a life threatening situation is theoretically allowed in the same way you’re allowed to use a knife for example. But since the gun is missing the breech and ammo it’s not really a good way to defend yourself and you could still get in trouble for owning ammo without the right to do so.
5. You’re not allowed to carry a gun in public. If you go to the shooting range the gun as well as all the mags must be unloaded and ammo has to be transported separately from the gun. Also you need to take the direct way to the shooting range if you’re stopping by a supermarket and you would get into a random police control you would get in trouble.
With that being said I have literally no idea how exactly the situation in America is regarding regulations, storage of guns/ammo etc. so I’m not gonna compare anything I just wanted to give some extra information.
Sorry, but most of your comment is fudd lore.
1. There's no such thing as a "certified gun holder" anywhere in the Swiss gun law. Everybody who's eligible per Article 8 WG can buy a gun. Military service doesn't even appear anywhere in the law. There's also no such thing as a "license" when it comes to acquiring a firearm. And if the difference between a permit (WES, ABK, SON) and a license eludes you, you probably shouldn't be educating people on Swiss firearms regulations.
2. P220 in this context actually but that's hardly important. The acquisition of ammo isn't tied a "license" or any other condition other than those required to buy a gun itself (see Article 15 WG).
3. Only for full-autos (including the ones converted to semi-auto) does the bolt carrier group have to be removed. Literally every other type of firearm doesn't require that. Buying ammo as an individual isn't affected by whatever the army deems "suitable" for its soldiers.
4. Again, the requirements to buy ammo are the same as to buy a gun. If you legally own a gun, you're automatically legally allowed to buy ammo (minus the ones mentioned in Article 26 and 27 WV of course). It's that simple.
5. That depends. Stopping by a supermarket is fine as long as it's on your direct route.
Thanks for your comment let me clarify a few things
1. You’re right I used the word license but I’ve meant the weapons acquisition certificate WES. The reason for that is simply because English isn’t my mother language and I used the wrong term. Yes there are differences between a license and the WES but in that context what I tried to say is you need the WES before you can buy a firearm you cannot do it without it. And yes exactly the army isn’t mentioned because regarding the army weapon you keep there are different rules that apply because it’s not in the WG.
2.P220 is only for lieutenants and some infantry soldiers get them as well although I don’t think that the soldiers take that gun home while the lieutenants do. The soldiers usually only take home the SIG 550. Glock 17 is for military police only. But yes that doesn’t really matter to much in that context. Yes buying ammo is only tied to the WES which you need to have and that’s what I initially meant is that just because you get a gun from the army you’re not allowed to buy ammo for it if you don’t have a WES. And a lot of people don’t have that even though they have the army weapon at home.
3. Privately yes but again regarding the army weapon different rules apply. And again yes buying ammo as an individual doesn’t have anything to do with the army. My point was that a lot of people think we get a gun in the army and some ammo and then take it home when that is not the case.
4. Again yes you’re right I did clarify above already.
5. Also true should have been more clear about going anywhere that isn’t on the direct route.
My comment was mostly regarding the army weapon not private acquisitions.
Because in the video he reacts to it’s heavily focused about the army weapons where different rules apply so I wanted to give some extra information about that.
@@calledyannis
1. To be fair to you, there are many people who don't think that the WES is a permit because it isn't explicitly called "Bewilligung" (to me, it's obvious that it is a permit). So this topic of license/permit/other isn't even all that obvious even in the official languages. Nevertheless, there are many guns that don't require a WES, for example a K31. (Article 19 WV).
2. That's what I'm trying to tell you. The WES is not required to buy ammo as an individual. In order to buy ammo, you only need to be qualified to buy a gun (that's exactly what Article 15 WG says). A WES is one way to show that to a seller, but it's not required. You can also provide a copy of your criminal records (not older than 2 months) or a hunting pass or equivalent.
3. True.
My problem with this video is that he acts like there's basically only the SAT as a source for civilian gun ownership and nothing else.
I see. I’m glad you added that information thanks for sharing I definitely learned something.
I honestly wasn’t to deep into the ammo and gun acquisition process because I’m an example of: I have a Glock 17 at home from the army but never went and bought other guns or ammo and also didn’t obtain the WES or anything.
Therefore I wanted to show that there’s also people like me that own a gun but never use it outside the army which raises the density of firearms per capita. That’s why some people might get mislead by statistics.
I also agree on you last point.