UK Bad Drivers & Driving Fails Compilation | UK Car Crashes Dashcam Caught (w/ Commentary)
Вставка
- Опубліковано 11 жов 2024
- ⭐This video featuring driving fails, instant karma, close call, road rage, hit and run, car crashes, good drivers, bad drivers, and many more... This video can be utilized as a learning tool, so the viewers can learn from other mistakes, not their own.
⭐ Looking for a dashcam for your car? We recommend VIOFO:
➡️ For UK
VS1 2K: amzn.to/4anhmOu (5% off promo code: RubyDAVS1)
A229 Pro 4K: amzn.to/3UA9ofb (5% off promo code: RubyDA229PRO)
➡️ For US
VS1 2K: amzn.to/3wvcjxD (5% off promo code: RubyDAVS1)
A229 Pro 4K: amzn.to/4dLMdY6 (5% off promo code: RubyDA229PRO)
(affiliate link that may earn us commission) - Purchasing a product using these affiliate links earns us a commission and is a great way to support the channel at no extra cost!
*Driving safely should be your number one concern behind the wheel. Following these defensive driving tips from our videos to improve your own road safety.
⭐Ruby Dashcam Academy provides actual footage of road incidents captured on dash cams. There's a story-line & our own unique contributions (TEXT COMMENTARY & VOICE-OVER) throughout the video. We have also added the special editing effects, trimming, zooming, etc with the footage throughout the compilation. This whole process required our 3-5 days for producing a video.
⭐These videos with own unique contributions can be used as an educational and informative resource for viewers to analyze and evaluate situations, stay alert and get out of a potentially dangerous situation on the road in the future.
⭐Visit our official website for defensive driving tips: rubydashcamaca...
⭐ALL VIDEOS USED WITH LICENSING AGREEMENT FROM COPYRIGHT OWNER!
If we made a mistake or you just want to remove your clip, please let us know here: hannahbruntnell114@gmail.com
⭐Submit your clip for the feature here: rubydashcamaca...
---------
Thank you for watching and stay safe!
#ukdashcam #ukcarcrashes #baddrivers #drivingfails
#6 straight to the police with that clip.
@@RomanLT XD
Maybe it was reported a decade or so ago when this clip first surfaced.
Somalian driving licence
#6 unbelievable stops on dual carriageway to look in bags with a slip road just 400 yards away
@@JohnSmith-ei2pz What about DNA?
@@MaedrothUncivilised, entitled DNA.
This type of behaviour will continue to worsen and become more prevalent so long as some groups in society are treated more leniently than others. If I did that I would rightly get six points and a fine. I bet she got nothing.
@@piele1982 What does DNA mean in this instance?
@@goodyeoman4534 Well, she wasn't driving so why would she?
1:05 Dear motorcyclist. The light was just changing to green as you came off your brakes, accelerated and hammered through. Green means you can proceed providing it is safe to do so. It wasn't. Maybe the car driver was delayed getting through the light. Maybe she jumped the red but you did not make a good decision. Good observation is a critical riding skill and you should always expect the worst from every situation. You gambled and lost this time. I hope you're okay though pal. Nobody likes to see bikes getting hit.
I see people go through red lights all the time. Its bad, but thats the reality. If bikers or any road users speed through a light that barely just turned green they are not going to be driving for long on a public highway
He went through a red light. Hopefully the idiot submitted that as evidence to both insurance companies.
1:33 “Two seconds, I’ve got music playing”. Who knows?, without that distraction the motorcyclist might possibly have noticed the red Ford. It is possible that the same would apply to the car driver as well.
The motorcyclist was definitely a little lacking in caution, but there was no way that driver had anything but a red light and she chanced it, she should get a good 6 points for that shite!
As the saying goes, cemetaries are full of people who had right of way
#6 is an example of extreme numptiness. If memory serves me right, that entire stretch is a 'no stopping' zone, so she's committed an offence in itself.
I hope the student learned the maxim, "Treat every other motorist as a blithering idiot, and you'll be proved right more often than you'd think"...
2nd clip. Motorcyclist has no self-preservation instinct. I give it a second and have a look and I'm in a 2 tonne car.
crash for cash, if you're going to be a knob a pull out into oncoming traffic, regardless of the lights only just changing and then STOP in front of the car to make sure you're hit, you should probably turn in your licence. Doesn't matter if the ford was wrong or not, the motorcyclist was just as wrong.
Yep plus he said he had music on (prob headphones) basically an idiot on 2 wheels.
Yep probably distracted by the music he admitted he was listening 2 as a motorcyclist for over 40 years I can not understand why you want to have music playing under a crash helmet
The motorcyclist went on Green, he timed it perfectly (probably too perfectly), the Fiesta definitely jumped the lights, probably does it multiple times a week as part of her daily routine. I also reckon when he braked he was trying to avoid the Fiesta and didn't factor in the wet road so his stopping distance would be longer, it didn't help either that the Fiesta was slow to brake.
I know there are a few agressive motorcyclists on here who try to engineer footage or at least escalate situations, but I dont think this is the case here. the Fiesta was so late going through the lights I reckon if the Volvo on the left had took off smartly they would have t-boned the Fiesta.
Rather than victim blame, the concern here should be that the actions of the Fiesta are being normalised, if you're in a 2-tonne car you owe it to vulnerable road user not to jump lights, She's a 100% to blame here IMHO.
@@makemineapint She was VERY late through the lights, absolutely 100% her fault, no question whatsoever about it.
#6 - yet another golden oldie from some time in the last century. How many channels has this clip been on?
#2 The amber light still means stop, not go across the junction because the lights are going green anyway. And given the road conditions & vulnerability of being on a bike, it wasn't the cleverest of moves regardless of the rights & wrongs of the car also jumping the lights. And you had music playing so you couldn't hear what was going on............ Genius!
Dude has zero self preservation, or situational awareness skills. You could see quite plainly the car that hit him wasn't stopping, yet he goes any way, then stops in front of her. Unless he ups his observational skills, he won't live long on a bike.
As for the music, I ride (started 36 years ago) with music on, but I can still hear what's going on around me. I can hear people talking, even over the sound of both music, and a straight piped bike. I can't understand them cause they're muffled, but I can still hear them. That's probably why he asked her to wait a second so he could pause his music, and/or get his helmet off so he could understand her.
#6......next junction Blackbird Leys. Ok, that explains it.
#3 The car driver is 100% wrong. The motorcyclist is 100% foolish. "2 second I got music playing"!! Good grief 😔
She certainly went through a red but it wasn't green for the bike either.
@@drcl7429 Exactly.👍🏻
He's a amber gambler that lost 😂
Motorbike when through a red light. it was red and amber when he went through which is still a red light, green means proceed if safe to do so, both in the wrong
@@Simon-rx7sv would love to know what his insurance said about him rolling on that amber, yes she hit him so her fault technically, but hmmmmm *shrug*
#2 1:27 "didn't see the fiesta until it was too late". Sure, buddy. As a motorcyclist myself, if your observation is so shockingly bad at junctions as you claim, then continuing to ride like that you'll be dead before the year is up.
But of course, the truth of the matter is that rather than continuing at the pace you were already at, thus ensuring you'd have been well clear of the Fiesta, you deliberately stopped in its path so that it would smash into you, causing you injury, whilst gambling with your life that it could be anything from light bruising to death, but at least you'd have some footage to post to the internet for your 10 seconds of fame.
🙄
A Darwin award awaits for you at some point in the not-too-distant future.
#7 - “Double Parked Van”? No it was a badly parked van, not 10 yards from a junction and a female entered the equation, who couldn’t drive and had no concept of road manners, she had 3 options available all painless.
#4 cry moar. She's using the exit of the roundabout correctly to avoid blocking the roundabout. The later part I don't condone though.
I don't think he was crying, just pointing out a s*** driver.
To avoid blocking a roundabout, you don't enter it till your intended exit is clear.
@@Whiskers74 there was space at her exit, so she took it...
More*
@@aitch8237 no, there wasn't space at the exit. They were behind other cars waiting to get off at that exit but they decided they were more important than everyone else and forced their way in-front which only causes further delays down the line, not to mention the potential for the other road users to get upset at this and cause an altercation which endangers everyone. Safe driving isn't just about driving safely, it's also about not intentionally upsetting other drivers. The Main Character Syndrome is strong with this one.
#6 is a joke! Literally! "So, Two cars, a Karen and a police officer meet at a crossroads..."
It's #7
Pedestrians also need to follow highway code and not cross in front of a stationary vehicle where they cant be seen.
Do they teach that in the UK? It happens so often that I asssumed it was not a rule here
@@bradsvids They do teach the "green cross code" in UK schools, that outlines how to cross safely. However the hierachy of road users places less legal responsibility on pedestrians than it does on motorists. That overtake was dodgy because the oncoming vehicle forced them to maintain a high speed, therefore putting the pedestrians at risk.
That said, OP is correct, pedestrians still have a legal responsibility to minimise risk.
@@thorin4406 just wait behind buses tbh
It's absurd to expect pedestrians to follow the highway code
@@TheStu9000 Exactly. I used to do this.
Just get off the bus, wait until the bus moves away and cross behind the bus, once your visibility (to see AND be seen) is better.
5:00, where the mercedes has stopped for the woman to get something out of the boot. Should have been sent to the police, that is a violation of road traffic. Not an emergency to just stop. Looking at 3pts at least and a hefty fine
3rd clip. It was on amber - move off if safe to do so. It wasnt.
For #3, the highway code (at least the website version, I don’t have a printed copy at hand) the section on light signals controlling traffic literally says:
“RED AND AMBER also means ‘Stop’. Do not pass through or start until GREEN shows”
Fine, they ran the light. But by that reading, you did exactly the same. In that situation, who’s crunchier? Who’s more likely to get hurt?
Exactly. Look after yourself first and foremost. I'm in a car and I always look when passing through a traffic light that's on green just in case someone's running a red.
Car driver still shouldn't have gone through, but bike rider needs to get some self preservation skills fast
Brake checking someone whilst riding a motorcycle is insane.
that Scottish woman "I swear it was amber" - see needs her licence revoked!
It could very well have been, lingering on amber as she approached the line, but just turned red as she we going over it. Take a close look at where the lights are when motorbike starts accelerating. Red and Amber mean "Get Ready", not "floor it!". He was over the line before it turned green. That collision was his fault just as much as it was hers.
0:47 I wonder why the video cuts out there ? Is it because the cyclist went through red light ? 🤣🤣🤣
No sympathy for the biker in #3 went on amber and at full speed, then stopped in front of the car.
Before anyone says "she ran the red" yes and if he had rode correctly, she would be 100% to blame.
But, you need to make sure the junction is clear before moving off, this includes making sure no one is running the red. On a bike, you need to be aware of your surroundings.
its almost like he purposely put himself in danger. Like to not even try and get out of the way of the car, instead he just puts on the brakes and stops in front her
Two bikers here that will be lucky to see Christmas. :(
The police should have ticketed the balfour Beaty van as he should have never been parked so close to the junction
Do you expect the Mcdonald boys to do their job?
Meanwhile in the real world.
2:05 rider got that wrong, gotta check it's clear fella or it could cost ya life. ❤️🇬🇧
#3 I inspected that a lot. Bikers lights are still Red + Amber when he goes passed them. So, sorry dude, but you're cam shows you at fault and no camera to show the other lights. At very best you both failed and are in the wrong. But the evidence only shows your mistake and not hers.
aye hes a dafty
2:50 is down the road from my house 🤣🤣
#3 the rider should be checking traffic from the left, even on a set of lights. They MAY WELL have had right of way but its not gonna save them from being hit .... Useless biker.
#7... I'm in the right, so I'm going to make the situation worse and not solve someone else's mistake...
I hate when I forget my bag of crack in the boot, and have to stop traffic to retrieve it.
#3 driver ran the light and has a pissy fit!
I'd love to know the outcome of the insurance there!
#9 coming to a full stop because…?
I'm still figuring that out. Only reason I can think of is crash for cash.
Because they’d been hit, the car behind went to overtake then when the Prius pulled out they pulled back in hitting the cam car so they stopped.
I mean why did they stop in the first place, not after they’d been hit
@@mopman94 but they stopped before they got hit, so the the question is, why would they stop?!
Clip 1 , the cabbies attitude suggests he’s only sorry because he pooped himself about losing his job and license. Goes to show that an upfront apology goes a long way. Even if it is obviously bull. Saying that all the London cabbies I know literally detest cyclists.
The cyclist would have reported him regardless of whether or not he had received an immediate apology and you know it. And the cyclist was riding carelessly at speed and was the first to hurl abuse. I'm surprised you can't objectively see that.
Off course I can , but the cyclist does have right of way and can travel at any speed they wish . Sometimes you gotta know when to say sorry immediately. Basic common sense should tell you that, especially doing a job where lots of people can use video footage against you . Are you a London cabbie by any chance ?
Having occasionally had to "mingle" with them professionally, there's a reason cabbies hate cyclists. Gangs of lycra hooligans, knowing no law but their own.
@@fegstachops6746 "Has the right to travel at any speed they wish". And there you have it, folks: "because I can" mentality in real time. I completely understand why these people are despised by so many.
@@goodyeoman4534 well aslong as the cyclist hurled abuse first... i guess we ignore the potentially lethal driving because that cant be linked to it at all.... nope, cant be what caused the poor guy to get some mild abuse.
green light goes not meen it is safe to go
Clip #2 - I can't see what the issue is.
Never, ever, EVER brake check a car if you're on a bike. You'll lose that fight. Very stupid of that biker.
That second clip looks like he did that on purpose, like he wanted to claim of insurance. It's because of idiots like this that insurance costs are raising every year for the rest of us.
#7 these are always the best clips.
No.3 motorcyclist at the Traffic Light Controlled Junction - You saw the car and applied the brakes instead of the throttle - inviting the accident
#3 Red Amber means stop.... not saying Car driver isn't at fault, be he sped up through Red Amber - he has some blame too
The motorbike 1:04 was just as much to blame. GREE means GO IF IT IS CLEAR.
He just stormed right through so he was driving without due care and attention.
Plus he zoomed through and then slowed down for her to hit him.
I had a motorcycle and you have to be more aware of what is going on around you.
1:07 , are we dragracing buddy ? i see red , then amber ... still not green and pulls up where the other side probably just had red ........ would say both at fault !
correct sir
The motorcyclist going through Red/Amber lights (see lights on traffic island opposite) was pushing his luck by jumping the lights. The Orange Ford was pushing it with (at best) an amber light or more likely it just turned red just before she crossed the stop line. Bottom line - they are both at fault and the motorcyclist should count himself lucky he did not qualify for a Darwin award.
0.26 any taxi undertaking an alleged road traffic offence should not only be reported to the Police but also to the licensing authority and they may take action.
What dashcam are you using I have a next base and doesn’t pick up number plates
#8 i dont really know what you are expecting him to do there. His side of the road os clealry blocked
Yes I thought the same. Clearly the van parked up has caused the problem. But this could of easily been avoided by both drivers not being so stubborn
# 2 - The complete lack of awareness of so many pedestrians is staggering. To cross the road in directly front of a stationary bus only offers a sight line of the opposite side of the road to oncoming traffic but gives absolutely no vision of what is going on behind and alongside the vehicle. Stupidity by a factor of 100!
#3 - 2 knobs equal two knobs with no idea how to drive or ride. The car jumped the lights but doesn’t the Highway Code state that once the lights are green, proceed when safe?
#6. I can understand the biker being brake-checked, but the mini could have pulled into the nearside lane, and let the biker go. But the mini driver is an experienced driver (as they must have a licence), to not feel threatened. If that's the case, the driver should not be driving
No 3 biker speeds over the amber light
That motorcyclist should’ve anticipated that car and prepared, I saw it coming in the previous clip
#2 has no issue, they did have time & space to perform the manoeuvre The users of the bus are the ones who have no sense of self preservation, when there is a FRICKING CROSSING hundred yards further on....
#3 Didn't help himself by appearing to go on a red and amber, and then not accelerating out of danger, but instead braking and leaving himself in the path of the car. Hard to overcome the instinct to brake when faced with that though.
1:40 drivers accelerating on amber or driving through red should have a permanent ban.
The biker is as much to blame as the driver. He approached the lights and adjusted his speed and gear for a 'rolling start' as soon as the red /yellow showed. In effect, they both jumped a red light.
That motorbiker break checking on a motorway was definitely using most idiotic brain cell in his head.
Very lucky not to end up as instant road kill.
Red and amber light doesnt mean "go when its safe to do so" anymore for the bike rider?
4.50 report to police. Incredible stupidity. That driver does not have a full driving license.
#9 he gets a hit and run and just sits there while they get further away
So what else are they supposed to do with other traffic going past them ?
They got hit because they slammed on the brakes driving down a slow, almost straight road for no reason. Both twunts.
#3 .... he knew the light had only just changed (amber to green just), wet road and he didnt look once left. Some precaution is needed.
#6 what an absolute tosser. Driver kept their cool, fair play. I’d have been going mad
#7 you had a massive gap on the left you see 5:29 clip at 5:28 cars was creaping out slowy yet you procede like and entitled ken/karen and its my right of way. Both as bad as each other one just has a cam to prove they idiots.
That's not a massive gap, that's the only bit of drivable road. She would not be able to get around him if he waited there, because the other side of the road has cars on it too. He'd have to mount the kerb if he decided to wait there (which you're not supposed to do). Plus, he says there's a car behind him, so it means 2 people doing that.
All she had to do was move to the left a bit, as though it was a mini roundabout, or to reverse a bit. Given that her choice was to go an entirely different direction to the one she wanted, she's probably not a very good driver and is incapable of doing either option.
#3 as a biker and and a car driver myself, never assume it is safe just because you're on green. Defensive riding would have saved you from pain, yes she jumped the red and that's inexcusable but, always assume other road users are idiots
#5 - biker non-defensive but aggressive; riding to the WRONG SIDE of the car and too close by an absolute mile. If he was that desperate to get past, he could have passed on the left for AGES before he did. He should have been positioned to the left of the mini, WAY further back than he was. The car driver flashed brake lights to ask him to back up a bit which wasn't clever... but then the BIKER brake checks?! WTAF - man has a death wish. Had she hit him and he lived, and this footage was in evidence, he would have a hell of a difficult conversation with the judge.
Here at 1:04 the light is on red and yellow. This means stop and stop. So, actually the biker goes through red (stop)and yellow ( stop if still possible, was possibly because it was red.....). So, he is wrong. But did the woman also drive through a yellow (stop, if still possible, was possible i supprbecause she was late on the crossing). The time both lights are on yellow is the "clearing time", to clear the crossing. Who is really wrong here in this accident? Here in 🇳🇱 lights do not go to yellow before going to green. That way you never go to early, like the biker.
Well done standing up to yet anoter Karen. Hope the copper gave her aright bollocking
#9 why are they stopping there at the junction?
2:45 The roundabout exit is 2 lanes and the car vacated the roundabout. I'd argue there's nothing wrong with that. Mounting the sidewalk, however, big no-no.
Absolute muppet on the bike in clip 2.
Amber is stop if safe or proceed with caution, not put your foot down and run people over.
#4 if you have the time to complain about filtering a long queue and not being heled up for minutes by right lane traffic then thats on you......jeez.
1:05 motorcyclist literally stopped in the middle of the road in order to get hit. I understand theres rules as to what goes when driving on the road but people, in order to get an insurance claim, will literally throw themselves in front of a moving car, piss poor behaviour from the motorcyclist.
04:56 Unbelievable. Hopefully there's a fine in the post.
#1 is a cyclist who has no awareness. Rule number 1 is look after yourself.
#3 went through on amber and not from a standstill.
Clip #1 whilst the rider is clearly in the right, it looks suspiciously like the clip ends just before he runs a red light.
2nd clip the biker shouldn't be listening to music as it proves he wouldn't be able to hear emergency vehicles
#3 Biker is also in the wrong. His light was not green when he passed.
Technically the biker went through an amber light and should have checked the junction for trafgic😊..
Can all clips with no sound be banned.
Och aye a cars jumped the lights I must rush to get hit by it because I'm so very intelligent
Number 3 was a bit quick off the mark, possibly jumping the lights.
Did I hear correctly?
"I cannot feel my ankle"
"fcuk off"
Motorbiker shouldn't be jumping lights like that, he couldn't see if the path was clear and stopped when seen the car when he could have kept on going (green doesn't mean 30mph right away)i have it near me where they are trying to beat the yellow lights often when it's changing to green
Agreed. I think the driver was right when she said "I swear the light was amber". People need to remember that green does NOT mean go.
That's what happens when somebody goes through the amber at both sets at a junction. Both at fault there really
He didn't jump the light, even if he was early it would be red+amber which means go if the way is compleltely clear.
At the point he crossed the line it was.
Not really the riders fault someone entered the crossing afterwards, and especially not paying so little attention that they hit him.
Laszlo Plook, what are you taking about?
The cyclist overtook the stationary bus, while still in his lane.
And it is the responsibility of pedestrians to cross safely, not to just blindly walk out from behind a bus without looking, as per rule 7 of the highway code aka the green cross code.
He's not referring to the cyclist overtaking the bus...
He was talking about the silver car that also overtook the cyclist.
Ah, right. Thought it was the cyclist.
But my point about the pedestrians is still valid.
@@mijimonmaster the green cross code has been rescinded it feels like with some of the highway code changes that have come out in recent years.
Rule 223 - "Buses, coaches and trams. Give priority to these vehicles when you can do so safely, especially when they signal to pull away from stops. Look out for people getting off a bus or tram and crossing the road."
#7
Karen was in the only lane should could be because the vehicle parked at the junction
Karen was also past the stop sign which means she had emerged and now has priority, you sould have pulled in behind the white taxi
Cam car absolutely caused that situation
Remember, no-one has right of way,
You are right, but the accident was inevitable and easily avoided. Stop thinking Highway Code and who is right or wrong, think “stay safe”.
#6 “have your steering all the way to the right” so you get punted straight into the path of a fast-moving artic if you get rear-ended? Great advice… NOT!
#1 Taxi driver clearly in the wrong, but at the end it didn't look like the cyclist was going to stop for that red light either.
How desperate are you?
@@godofcycling He got up to speed and kept it steady as he got pretty close to the lights. When I'm on the bike approaching lights like that I'm thinking I'll ease off and maybe I won't have to stop. Do you ride right up to red lights then brake hard? It's not a good look to complain about car drivers, howevermuch they might deserve it, then do the one thing above all else that most drivers complain shows cyclists ignore the rules of the road.
Did they stop shouting when the Police arrived...😮😮😮
#4 cry baby.... They used the merge from the roundabout, whilst you waited & blocked the roundabout whilst waiting until you could move....
Drivers who cut the corner while turning right, are the biggest twats, so many times its happened to me, resulting in near misses.
Number 2. "I've got music playing" as he pulls away on Amber borderline green. Learn that riding on roads is not a fecking racing circuit.
No 3 the motor bike rider is also at fault, it was an amber light he went through, plus he accelerated to fast….he was also listening to music
listening to music is fine. Tonnes of motorcycle helmets can be bought with speakers. Nothing wrong with listening to music while riding. No different than someone in their car listening to music. But that motorcyclist is a dafty, he accelerated a tad too quick on an amber light and then stopped in front of her instead of going on himself. I don't think he would have got hit if he had've just kept her lit
Biker.....you went through red and amber,not green and at speed...
#5 First brake check was not a brake check it was just touching the brake to lighten the brake lights as a nice way of asking to please back of but should always be included with a closed finger backwave hand gesture.
Yeah I agree. I don't think they actually slowed the car at all. Even so, I wouldn't have done it, as it could cause the biker to panic or do something dangerous. That being said, the behaviour from the biker afterwards is just ridiculous, considering how vulnerable they are.
right, but seeing a vehicle going quicker than you in the passing lane not move over and let them pass and then also brake check them. What was all that about
@@TheGlovener1985 Yes agreed but the mini was still progressing to the next vehicle (if a little slow) for the next overtake and perhaps the bike may have been speeding, so the mini tapped brakes to ask nicely to back off but speeding biker still pursued too close then got rattled undertook then brake checked when mini was at speed limit just waiting to pass next vehicle and progressing as fast as law would allow.
@@rustydusty2992 ive had happen to me actually these types of folk never move from the lane. Its almost like they don't want anyone to pass. Still say the mini had plenty of time to move over before that, but instead decided that brake checking was the best course of action. Which it never is. Shouldn't be brake checking anybody no matter how close they are. Extremely dangerous.
@@TheGlovener1985 Like I said previously I dont agree that it was a brake check as no apperance of mini slowing and brake lights showed only very briefly, so lighting was merely the switch being activated on the pedal.
#3 your as much to blame on that one mate
5:09 I suspect they had a kid in the back about to throw up. Bad place to stop though.
I agree, I've got a daughter who suffers from motion sickness.
Nothing excuses that stupidity
Ah good call, mate, never thought of that. Still, it's unforgivable stupidity to do what she did. Cleaning sick of your back seats is preferable to getting flattened by a truck.
@@ColinWatters actually that’s what I thought as well as it was the back near side door that was opened by the woman after she’d collected the bag from the boot. If that was the case then there is some justification in stopping in a live lane, which is no different to stopping in an emergency on a live lane on a “smart” motorway. I think that there was a salutary lesson for the learner driver, expect the unexpected.
@@MRCAGR1 your happy to put people's lives at risk because of alittle sick. You are insane and part of the problem
#3 - technically the motorbike was right and the car wrong. The car should have stopped, but then technically, the motorbike is now damaged as he wasn't fully paying attention. It was obvious the car was coming through and if he had just held back a couple of seconds, it would have been a non-event.
#8 Driving too fast in those circumstances, had you been slower you could have eased into the space on the left and allowed him to pass. Alternatively, you could have reversed and allowed him to pass. But no, instead, you made him reverse onto a busy road. Easily avoided.
lolwut??? do you even drive?
@@TheStu9000 Yep. Most likely to a higher standard than you.
#8 guy turning in cut the corner if he had used the available road it wouldnt have been a problem
@@davedixon2068 I know he cut the corner. He is not absolved. But you deal with what you have. The guy with the camera drove too fast and exacerbated the problem.
@@andyquelch5754 I bet you do drive very slowly and carefully, definitely around 830am and 3pm as you pass by the local primary schools.
5:53, happened to my father and me once. But we lived around the corner. We but on the blinkers, got out and went home...😅. Then agter 10 minutes we came back and the driver was gone.
The clip off the biker being side swiped. That is at BAILLIESTON junction in Glasgow. I use it everyday. Everyday the clowns coming from the main st. Jump the lights all the time. Needs a red light camera. And here saying it was amber. What a dozy tart. Amber means stop.
nah she deffo would've been red, no way the change for the other set of lights is that quick
Amber, stop if safe to do so, but the bike went through on red and amber so he was in the wrong, plus he should have looked before going through the junction, so basically you have a car which may or may not have made an illegal move and a m/cycle who went through a red and didnt ensure the junction was clear to enter. I'd guess the insurance will have a field day saying no to any claims
#2 actually the pedestrians shouldnt be crossing at the front of the bus it should be from the rear, there is no pedestrians crossing so the car is well within his rights to take that stance...is it safe probably not but at the end of the day the pedestrians are 50% responsible for this as well. #3 car ran a red light and cyclist is well within his right to go on red and amber at same time.
NO HE ISNT. go on GREEN if safe to do so, it wasnt, they were both at fault
@@davedixon2068 Actually you can go on red and amber if safe to do so, read the highway code.
@@jasondewhurst7054 go on red/amber is at a pedestrian crossing not a lights controlled junction, maybe you should read the highway code
@@davedixon2068 actually its not.
@@jasondewhurst7054 read the book
#6 WTF
The cyclist in the 1st clip ran the red shortly after recklessly undertaking the taxi - no way he could've stopped in time. Cyclists are a unique form of menace almost exclusively unto themselves.
Was thinking the same he saw the gap and thought a cycle up ahead ill zoom into that he was in cabs blind spot all way up the road then uses his little buzz light year horn 😂 to warn the driver, morons like this with dash cams be it in cars bikes lorry's busses new trend #moronswithcams
Yep I bet he did as well he didn't look like stopping either
If you look closely, there was an another green light next to the right. I’m not sure he did go through a red.
@@charleswrigley as if you'd know flubber?
At the very end outside One Aldgate he was heading towards a green straight on filter if that's what you mean.