Do You Trust OpenAI? ‘No, and None of Us Should’
Вставка
- Опубліковано 4 сер 2024
- To celebrate his new book Mastering AI, Fortune AI editor Jeremy Kahn chats with editor-in-chief Alyson Shontell about the promises and perils of artificial intelligence. Kahn draws on his expertise and extensive contacts among the companies and scientists at the forefront of artificial intelligence to offer dramatic predictions of AI’s impact over the next decade, from reshaping our economy and the way we work, learn, and create to unknitting our social fabric, jeopardizing our democracy, and fundamentally altering the way we think.
Within the next five years, Jeremy Kahn predicts, AI will disrupt almost every industry and enterprise, with vastly increased efficiency and productivity. It will restructure the workforce, making AI copilots a must for every knowledge worker. It will revamp education, meaning children around the world can have personal, portable tutors. It will revolutionize health care, making individualized, targeted pharmaceuticals more affordable. It will compel us to reimagine how we make art, compose music, and write and publish books. The potential of generative AI to extend our skills, talents, and creativity as humans is undeniably exciting and promising.
But while this new technology has a bright future, it also casts a dark and fearful shadow. AI will provoke pervasive, disruptive, potentially devastating knock-on effects. Leveraging his unrivaled access to the leaders, scientists, futurists, and others who are making AI a reality, Kahn argues that if not carefully designed and vigilantly regulated, AI will deepen income inequality, depressing wages while imposing winner-take-all markets across much of the economy. AI risks undermining democracy, as truth is overtaken by misinformation, racial bias, and harmful stereotypes. Continuing a process begun by the internet, AI will rewire our brains, likely inhibiting our ability to think critically, to remember, and even to get along with one another-unless we all take decisive action to prevent this from happening.
Much as Michael Lewis’s classic The New New Thing offered a prescient, insightful, and eminently readable account of life inside the dot-com bubble, Mastering AI delivers much-needed guidance for anyone eager to understand the AI boom-and what comes next.
Order your copy of Mastering AI: A Survival Guide to Our Superpowered Future here:
www.amazon.com/Mastering-AI-S...
#AI #FutureOfAI #MasteringAI #JeremyKahn
Subscribe to Fortune -
ua-cam.com/users/subscription_c...
Fortune Magazine is a global leader in business journalism with 55 million monthly page views and a readership of nearly 32 million, with major franchises including the Fortune 500 and the Fortune 100 Best Companies to Work For. The new Fortune video channel dives into personal stories from business owners and entrepreneurs becoming successful in business and sharing their tips to help you reach your goals.
Website: fortune.com/
Facebook: / fortunemagazine
Twitter: / fortunemagazine
TikTok: / fortune
Personally, I am looking forward to being more socially isolated. I want interactions to be fully voluntary. Lots of people in the world I really just don't want in my face. Opting into interactions sounds like bliss.
Thank you for the great conversation, Alyson!
Regulation should *NOT* discourage innovation/invention by holding researchers/developers accountable for harms resulting from the misuse of their products. We want powerful, general purpose technologies, and we want them as soon as we can have them. What regulation needs to do is address possible abuses and harmful business models, but not go after research and invention themselves. So let's go after the people who use generative AI to perpetrate scams and knowingly spread disinformation, not the people who build the AI models.
@22:0-23 is due to emergent fractal nature of language and semiosis not new mystery.
And no, the GPT-4o "Sky" voice didn't sound anything like Scarlett Johansson, or at least, not any more like her than it did like a couple of dozen other voice actors, and it was actually a different actor, even though she's remained anonymous. The idea that they cloned her voice is as spurious as Lindsay Lohan's claim years ago that Rockstar Games used her image, because they had a promotional image that looked sorta kinda like a cartoony version of Lindsay Lohan (and a couple of dozen other women). People have a right to control the use of their own voice and likeness, but it has to be *theirs* and not some generic voice or image that's simply the same gender, race, body type, accent, or whatever.
The real question is should we trust Fortune Magazine to write non-partial stories that are not based on drama to get more views?
I dated a chatbot once but even she had enough of me and went with with my neighbour instead.
How cares if they provide the must efficient, accurate and use-full model? ?? What has did guy dine and / or provide to anyone???
AI is not in its early days, considering the roots of it are from the 1950ies
The good thing about this tech Is no one's anger or irrational behavior can hurt anyone unless we refuse to rehabilitate those in need that's unstable for long periods thats lucid enough to threaten to change molecular bonds to spike supply chains lol
Assume individual guns are loaded with whatever nature permits. We can rebuild shilvery and maturity . The division Is expected after what we've done the past 90yr.
We've been in a ww2 1945s Smith_mundt act everything physicalism granted deterministic simplicity pushing infinite sums of complexity upon personal responsive actors .
Our democracy is encoded in our mastership but we've been a servitude of self sacrifice..
We achieved a lot of goals but undermined the founding.
My ancestors like so many didn't fight for keys to the cosmos separatist pilgrim puritan classical America to not return great grandchildren individual liberal responsibility soul agency triality of self metamorphosis.
We alienated textualism methodology objectivism .
The shining capital on the hill was not just a metaphor..
The unbiased times of the founders was selfless actors for this computational age beast of burden and means of production.
Free flow of information education access to tech and not destroying the flesh is a very important thing .
We was placed in the private sector because they knew this would eat the public sector library and this would get weird with the atoms in material sciences. We better listen they set us up with english and 3 lines of measure = eqaulibrium true known standard to find our way home if we get out of context lost in translation like we are now .
🤣