A Conceptual Approach to Controllability and Observability | State Space, Part 3

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 5 вер 2024

КОМЕНТАРІ • 77

  • @BrianBDouglas
    @BrianBDouglas 5 років тому +152

    Hey everyone, thanks for watching this video! If you have any questions or comments that you'd like me to see, please leave them under this comment so that I get notified and can respond. Cheers!

    • @prashantajabe2693
      @prashantajabe2693 5 років тому +2

      Make video on the how to interpret sensor data.

    • @benallia8262
      @benallia8262 5 років тому +3

      exactly what i asked! thank you brian :D

    • @gosayeweldemaryam2415
      @gosayeweldemaryam2415 5 років тому +2

      Hi brian
      I'm from ethiopia. Your videos are exceptional. I'm truly satisfied. I thank you. My question is that can you do such videos on linear quadratic regulator (LQR)?

    • @BrianBDouglas
      @BrianBDouglas 5 років тому

      @@benallia8262 Glad to hear it!

    • @BrianBDouglas
      @BrianBDouglas 5 років тому +2

      @@gosayeweldemaryam2415 I'm finishing up a video on LQR right now! Should post next week.

  • @kaipn9763
    @kaipn9763 5 років тому +190

    You and Steve Brunton are 2 gems of control systems.!

    • @ramisketcher2069
      @ramisketcher2069 5 років тому +2

      Indeed! ;)

    • @triagung2497
      @triagung2497 4 роки тому

      I couldn't agree more!

    • @turbotoblast4
      @turbotoblast4 3 роки тому

      As true as it gets.

    • @oldcowbb
      @oldcowbb 2 роки тому +3

      i just realize both of them are from Seattle

    • @jagadishkumarmr1067
      @jagadishkumarmr1067 Рік тому +3

      I would say Katkim show and Christopher Lum(especially for aerospace) are can be added to the list..!
      Its just amazing that anyone can learn anything over the internet!

  • @HerChip
    @HerChip 4 роки тому +7

    Such a practical example (the beam) at the end makes things so much more logic (unobservable modes) than I learned in class

  • @victorthepaduani
    @victorthepaduani 5 років тому +6

    This deserves 100K+ views. Good job, Brian. Stay productive!

  • @daouadiwalid5491
    @daouadiwalid5491 7 місяців тому

    That car driving example hits hard ... Brian shows that perfect examples could exists!

  • @wiloberlies9598
    @wiloberlies9598 5 років тому +10

    Really nice job Brian, you're right to be proud of this one...excellent explanation with well-chosen examples. Thank you for this!

  • @divyanshsati1116
    @divyanshsati1116 3 роки тому +1

    God bless you Brian, finally could understand the intuition behind all that math!

  • @ashkabrawn
    @ashkabrawn 4 роки тому +2

    Omg... I just came here after watching Steve's series !! Thanks for the pointers

  • @thegent5167
    @thegent5167 2 роки тому +1

    This is a fantastic explaination of the topic and gave me a better and clearer view of controllability and observability. Thanks a lot!

  • @shuvodev3708
    @shuvodev3708 7 місяців тому +1

    Thank you Brian

  • @patrickayivor2406
    @patrickayivor2406 4 роки тому +1

    Simple explanation with powerful examples

  • @hyperduality2838
    @hyperduality2838 5 років тому +7

    Controllability is dual to Observability
    Poles (eigenvalues) are dual to Zeroes
    The Initial value theorem IVT is dual to the Final value theorem FVT
    Stability is dual to instability
    Robustness is dual to performance
    Complex numbers are dual to real numbers
    In physics equivalence, similarity is also known as duality, so we have the the following duals (Jewels):-
    Energy is equivalent or dual to mass -- Einstein
    Gravitation is dual to acceleration --- Einstein
    Potential energy is dual to kinetic energy
    Space is dual to time -- Einstein
    Certainty is dual to uncertainty, the Heisenberg certainty/uncertainty principle
    Energy is literally duality. Energy is transported by the electromagnetic field in the form of photons or wave/particles, quantum duality. Energy is inherently dual. In physics everything is made out of energy hence duality.
    If energy is conserved and energy is duality then duality must be conserved! The conservation of duality is the fifth law of thermodynamics.
    Negative curvature is dual to positive curvature (Riemann, Gauss)
    Hyperbolic geometry is dual to elliptic, spherical geometry
    A white hole (big bang, divergence) is dual to an infinite mass black hole (convergence)
    In mathematics: Integration is dual to differentiation
    Duality creates reality, all observers are inherently dual if they are made out of energy
    Genes are dual to memes
    Everything (all things) is/are dual to nothing.

    • @ashkabrawn
      @ashkabrawn 4 роки тому

      Did you just cover Heisenberg in more ways than he himself pictured.. 😉😅

    • @hyperduality2838
      @hyperduality2838 4 роки тому

      @@ashkabrawn Dark energy is dual to dark matter!
      Thesis is dual to anti-thesis -- the generalized or time independent Hegelian dialectic.
      Hegel's cat: Alive (thesis, being) is dual to not alive (anti-thesis, non being) -- Schrodinger's cat.
      Immanuel Kant: Synthetic a priori knowledge, all knowledge is dual.
      Philosophy, physics, mathematics, control theory all lead to duality!
      "Philosophy is dead" -- Stephen Hawking.
      It looks like Mr Hawking got this one wrong! No philosophy = no duality.

    • @ashkabrawn
      @ashkabrawn 4 роки тому

      @@hyperduality2838 what is the duality for universe, biverse and multiverse ?

    • @hyperduality2838
      @hyperduality2838 4 роки тому +1

      @@ashkabrawn The future is dual to the past. Many worlds (possibilities) or the multiverse would be the future and the one world or universe (reality) is the past. The present or the 'now' is therefore the duality or the biverse.
      The future meets or intersects the past in the present via duality!
      Noumenal (before measurement, a priori) is dual to phenomenal (after measurement, a posteriori).
      Deduction (rational) is dual to induction (empirical) -- Immanuel Kant.
      Positive is dual to negative.
      Duality converts possible worlds into the real world or probability = 1.
      Time is dual:- My absolute time is your relative time and your absolute time is my relative time.
      Absolute time (Galileo) is dual to relative time (Einstein).

    • @ravikiran4495
      @ravikiran4495 6 місяців тому

      so ying and yang

  • @Daniboy370
    @Daniboy370 2 роки тому

    Probably the most useful video I happen to come across

  • @pravinpalve3771
    @pravinpalve3771 2 місяці тому

    why this video does not have million likes?

  • @dallasdominguez9501
    @dallasdominguez9501 Рік тому

    Another Brian Douglas Hood Classic👌

  • @mpja
    @mpja 5 років тому +2

    This definitely helps the intuition. Good video!

  • @mukuljobra3972
    @mukuljobra3972 2 роки тому

    Hey! I have watched your lectures on your UA-cam channel and it is good to see you here again on this MATLAB channel.
    Great explanation...nice work...Sir 😊

  • @AhmedMagdy-xb8bl
    @AhmedMagdy-xb8bl Місяць тому

    Man you are awesome.
    Thank you very much.

  • @yinarodriguez6672
    @yinarodriguez6672 2 роки тому

    Nice to find Brian here!

  • @spectra5024
    @spectra5024 Рік тому

    Your videos are art, thanks dude!

  • @jairguilhermecertorio6362
    @jairguilhermecertorio6362 4 роки тому +1

    Your definition of controllability is actually reachability, in continuous systems they are equivalent but for discrete systems they are not. To be reachable the system must be able to go from your initial state to any other state, to be controllable the system must be able to go from any initial state to zero. In discrete systems it is easy to see that a A = [0 0; 0 0] would be controllable (gets to zero from any point in one sampling without depending on B), but it would only be reachable if B = [1 0; 0 1] (individually control each state). Great video nonetheless.

  • @demisbooo743
    @demisbooo743 2 роки тому

    Great explanation! Thank you so much!

  • @johnfrobin
    @johnfrobin 4 роки тому

    Excellent video. Thank you.

  • @thelegendkilleragab
    @thelegendkilleragab 5 років тому +1

    Hello Brian, can you please make a lecture about stabilizability and detectability? those are very confusing terms. Thank you

  • @abdelz1617
    @abdelz1617 Рік тому

    Great video!

  • @vivekmech1
    @vivekmech1 5 років тому +3

    Hi Brian , awesome work!
    May I know which software you use for this illustrations?
    Thanks

  • @blitz8229
    @blitz8229 3 роки тому

    Thank you for this video!

  • @eatctitox
    @eatctitox 5 років тому +3

    Love your videos! Can you please explain why is the D matrix usually regarded as zero in college courses?

    • @samchan5251
      @samchan5251 5 років тому +7

      To my understanding. D matrix is the direct feed through term, the input will change your measurement (y) directly, not through the system evolution (Ax). And this type of system is rare (never see and cannot think of one). Note that if D is non-zero, the transfer function will not be strictly proper. Another reason maybe, because the maths is the same with or without D being zero, college courses usually design to be easy to understand and illustrate the key concept.

    • @samchan5251
      @samchan5251 5 років тому +2

      Just something came up in my mind. If you are discretizating a continuous time system, it is likely that the resulting discrete system (Ad,Bd, Cd,Dd) Dd is non-zero. I think there is a paper talks about discretization will introduce something call "sampling zeros". Even the continuous model is strictly proper, the discretized system will not be.

  • @qamarkilani551
    @qamarkilani551 5 років тому +2

    Hi Brian
    Many Thanks for your great videos , do you have notes/slides that can be shared in pdf format ?

  • @PlayboyHZ
    @PlayboyHZ 4 роки тому

    Would have been nice of some demonstrations in matlab/simulink, just like part 2

  • @MarcusViniciusMO
    @MarcusViniciusMO 2 роки тому

    Using reconstructed velocity, by position diferentiation, and these same positions as output can bring more information to estimate other states?

  • @blessoneasovarghese9834
    @blessoneasovarghese9834 3 роки тому

    Could you please tell me why will C-matrix be zero when states are not measurable. Also what could be the output y in the examples of train and car? What role do output y and C-matrix play in observability, conceptually?

  • @zeeshangla
    @zeeshangla 5 років тому +1

    Hey! good Job Sir,
    Hello All.... Is there any specialized Power system course using SIMULINK

  • @learningexploring5717
    @learningexploring5717 3 роки тому

    Thank you for sharing :)

  • @manerlind
    @manerlind 2 роки тому

    Это просто превосходно!

  • @shmoodiee6173
    @shmoodiee6173 4 роки тому

    Amazing stuff

  • @vineetverma6645
    @vineetverma6645 4 роки тому +1

    When we judge people from outside based on their color or financial status, we are observing only a handful of states, and thus we end up fooling ourselves

  • @tushermyth
    @tushermyth 3 роки тому

    wow!

  • @hyperduality2838
    @hyperduality2838 5 років тому

    Correction to my earlier mistake:-
    A white hole (big bang, divergence) is dual to an infinite mass black hole (convergence)
    Dark energy is literally hyperbolic geometry or negative curvature
    Positive is dual to the negative.

  • @achmadfatoni2555
    @achmadfatoni2555 3 роки тому

    Bnhihhhh

  • @pedrobenevenutovaladares9734
    @pedrobenevenutovaladares9734 3 роки тому

    Fantastic video !