Is Matthew's Jesus the MOST Jewish? With Dr. Bart Ehrman
Вставка
- Опубліковано 7 чер 2024
- Award-winning author, Biblical scholar, and Megan's podcasting bestie, Dr. Bart Ehrman, talks about the Jewish portrayal of Jesus in the Gospel of Matthew, and why Matthew is so critical of Jewish leadership. Is it anti-antisemitism,, or something else?
Access Bart's 8-lecture online course on the Genius of the Gospel of Matthew here: tinyurl.com/4hehdbr3
This is an affiliate link, and we will earn a small commission from your purchase. It's a great way to support the channel!
The Genius of the Gospel of Matthew dives into its literary genius and exploring deep questions about its historical context, interpretation, and impact on Christian morality and Jewish relations. Participants gain lifetime access to lectures, live Q&A sessions, and extensive resources for a comprehensive understanding of this influential text. Learn more at www.bartehrman.com/matthew
𒀭Support Digital Hammurabi!𒀭
Patreon - bit.ly/2EJVEdj
PayPal - bit.ly/2PUp49A
Shirts and Swag - bit.ly/2QKAuSH
Amazon Wishlist - amzn.to/2CsDhak
Website - bit.ly/2V0ZaVw
Twitter - bit.ly/2T6uJLV
Contact - digitalhammurabi@gmail.com
----------
For general information and sources relating to the Ancient Near East, we recommend these websites:
ABZU - bit.ly/2Cr1A8u (collection of free and open-access data)
University of Chicago Oriental Institute - bit.ly/2RcIiMl (great collection of free books and articles)
Livius.org - bit.ly/2Gzj5rx (general encyclopedia on the ancient world)
ETCSL - bit.ly/2QJsAZS (Sumerian literature)
ORACC - bit.ly/2QJsL7u (collection of projects relating to Mesopotamia)
EPSD - bit.ly/2PY99aw (Online Sumerian dictionary)
CDLI - cdli.ucla.edu (Cuneiform Digital Library Initiative)
----------
Music: Brak Bnei Original Composition - Розваги
Great to see Bart on DH. Megan is great interviewing Bart on his channel.
Thanks for this interview! I can't afford the course right now but it sounds exciting! 💯
👏🙂
Yay Digital Hammurabi, Megan and Dr Bart.
Great interview. ❤😊
Thank you Dr Ehrman and Megan
Thanks!
thanks !
Man i went through almost more than half of your videos, and i checked your entire playlist, its all suemrian or akkadian, Egypt or biblical topics. nothing really on Assyrians ? pretty confusing to me 😂. do you know Simo Parpola ?
"they [natsarim] have the Gospel according to Matthew in its entirety in Hebrew. For it is clear that they still preserve this, in the Hebrew alphabet, as it was originally written.- Epiphanius of Salamis, Panarion 29.9.4
Mark 1:1-8 appear to have been copied from Matthew 3. Likely done by a later editor, to explain who John the Baptist was.
I believe the phrase "in those days" near the beginning of a gospel indicates the original beginning of the text. Thus the original beginning of Mark is 1:9, and the original beginning of Matthew is 3:1. Which suggests that the antisemitic passages could have been added later, by editors working for the Roman church.
And the original beginning of Luke is 2:1. Now Marcion went to the church in Rome with some documents that he proposed should become a Bible; these included most of the letters of Paul and a gospel with the nativity story removed (by Marcion). Marcion was excommunicated as a heretic. Is Luke 1 a reaction to Marcion, doubling down on the nativity of Jesus by adding the nativity of John?
Why the self-correction of Israel for Palestine. It certainly wasn't Israel at the time. In terms of modern geography, do we have any reason to believe Matthew lived in what is now Israel rather than what is now Israel?
Because Matthew (if the guy was real) lived in the Roman Province of Judea. Not Palestine.
@@memorydrain7806 iirc Ehrman - along with most other scholars - thinks the guy who wrote the gospel of Matthew was a Greek speaker who probably didn't live in Judea. And Judea isn't Israel either.
@@johnrohde5510 Right. But we're playing along with who the character Matthew was.
Ah, but it is. Israel is the people that have occupied that location.
It's also the name of the kingdom that was established in the early Iron Age. This was well before it was called Palestine.
@@memorydrain7806 Israel is, according to the OT, the name of a people, rather than a place. As far as history goes, there's no evidence for a united monarchy and if it existed, it's borders would not have corresponded to modern Israel. There is evidence for a northern kingdom of Israel and a southern of Judah but their borders don't correspond to modern Israel either.
You know whats funny. If i wrote a letter, and did not mention my name, but yet people who know me and knew that i wrote that letter and were present at the time said i wrote that letter after i died, i mean its pretty obvious i wrote the letter. No need for people of those times to lie, multiple sources attest to matthew being written by Matthew. Bart adds his own subjective feelings and intertwines them with biblical literature. its an inaccurate and disingenuous lens to look through. for example if i am Christian, and i am studying an ancient Babylonian text, i will not do so with a christian perspective, because its not respectful towards the text.
So grateful to God that your channel is barely getting any views. Your part in the Great Deception could have been much bigger, but I am glad it wasnt.
🤣
For those of us who really like DH and want it to do well it’s great that you were gracious enough to give a view and a comment! Perhaps you should take a page from your own name and ”stay in your lane”
Well the reason Matthew was written in 'high level Greek' was because it was originally penned in Hebrew (kept by the 1st century Natsari and Ebionites), and a Greek-Hebrew scribe then translated it to Greek for the greco-roman (pauline) world. That high level greek translated version is what survived, while the true followers of Messiah hid in caves and holes in the ground from the jewish persecution.
Source on that?
referenced in the early church fathers, like Jerome, speaking (negatively) of the early Ebionite and Natsarim Jewish believers (from James and the Jerusalem church) that they had the original gospel of Matthew in its Hebrew form. Jerome admitted they had it in its original hebrew form, but he despised it being he despised Judaizing believers anyhow. @@pisse3000
@@NatsarimGuard The reference is from Papias and we only have it in quotation, without the full original context, but it implies the text he mentions to be a sayings gospel, which our Matthew is not.
Textual analysis also strongly suggests that it was originally composed in Greek. If not, the translation would have needed to be a very loose one
no.. here is the quote "they [natsarim] have the Gospel according to Matthew in its entirety in Hebrew. For it is clear that they still preserve this, in the Hebrew alphabet, as it was originally written.- Epiphanius of Salamis, Panarion 29.9.4...
you can find more with a simple wiki search. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nazarene_(sect)@@jeffmacdonald9863
@@NatsarimGuardfalse
Man i went through almost more than half of your videos, and i checked your entire playlist, its all suemrian or akkadian, Egypt or biblical topics. nothing really on Assyrians ? pretty confusing to me 😂. do you know Simo Parpola ?