Create OIL PAINT Effects with ACRYLICS! 🎨✨ (Norse Mythology Painting)
Вставка
- Опубліковано 24 сер 2024
- The first 500 people to use my link skl.sh/liobabr... will get a 1 month free trial of Skillshare premium!
✨Join me on Patreon and get access to the full painting process, over 200 videos, in-depth Material Guides, and downloadable references & sketches!
/ liobabrueckner
🪽Valkyrja Print:
lioba.info/sho...
✨Connect
/ liobabrueckner
/ liobabrueckner
/ liobabrueckner
This video is sponsored by Skillshare
The composition and layout of this oil painting are arranged in a staggered manner, showcasing a profound sense of hierarchy and cleverly guiding the viewer's gaze, making them feel as if they are in the world of the painting. Whether through color contrast, light and shadow effects, or object placement, they successfully direct the viewer's attention to the core of the picture, allowing them to immediately feel the theme and emotions of the work.
@@LuoDrawing this was written by AI
@@DejanOfRadic Not AI, I am a painter from China who doesn't understand English, so I used translation software to translate my Chinese
I think the AI took some liberties with the source material.
10:04 😂 you’re welcome
Amazing work! It’s a beautiful painting tho i think the posing of their arms is a bit strange
I think the way you used ai to create a reference for yourself was very smart, but it would have been cooler to see you give it your own twist/ change it up so that it doesn’t feel like almost an exact copy
Shouldn’t it be “Norse” Mythology in the title??
This painting is so cool! Even watching you paint, I’m still shook this is acrylic. You’re so good at making such expressive textures, and I can really feel the Art Nouveau inspiration in your work; it’s like being transported into a whole other world! Great work! 😍👍
Oh you're right! I updated the title! 🥰 Thank you so much for your kind words!!!🩷
Get rid of the dark outlines on the figures to make them meld better with the background like Zorn… 👍
I rarely comment on videos, but I just really loved the edit and content of this one! 😍Just everything in one entertaining art video: art process, historical and cultural information, a little behind-the-scenes and art tipps and the list could go on. 🙌🏽
Omgg thank you so much!!! That means a lot to me!! 😱
I don't know for sure, so take it with a grain of salt, but I think Valkyries only choose whose death is worthy of Valhalla, not who dies.
Oh this could be, I'm not an expert yet on Nordic mythology 😅
It’s still a bit debated amongst scholars what was meant. Most likely, the meanings and stories changed like most mythological systems. There’s a story in the Volsungs about a Valkyrie named Brynhilde who is punished by Odin for choosing to not kill a warrior that he wanted. So, that implies it’s not completely the Valkyries choice but rather Odin and/or Freyja’s choice. Then you have the Norns who create the destinies of men…it’s a bit convoluted and most likely it changed throughout time and regions.
It's beautiful!
Printing AI with extra steps. I got recommended coral dragon YT short and thought it was AI, turns out i wasn't far off. New age of trying to give Artificial Images credibility; another level of laundering images.
you are talented but can you just come straight out with the technique ( intead of all the other stuff) of making it look like a oil painting for those of us that just clicked to hear the secret to make our paintings better? Thank you For those that want the answer at 10 minute 5 sec mark use acrylic retarder with flow improver instead of water. It makes the paint more transparent
Hallo Lioba, das Bild ist super schön geworden. Und ich fand dein Video hat den Prozess toll komplementiert.
Liebe Grüsse aus der Schweiz!
Vielen lieben Dank! :D
All that work and effort, but it looks off because you used AI. That foot especially weird me out xD. The techniques are beautiful and well explained.
I love her work
Great video❤ very informative
Idk why, but you remind me of Alpay efe😅
She’s actually married to him!
@ayaneagano6059 really?
Yes, I am! 😁
I'm always glad to see an artist not afraid to try new tools and methods. It's artists' job to explore how to use AI-powered tools in the most creative ways 👏
@@ssr500_ nonsense. It is an artists job to translate their soul onto canvas.
I love her work 😻
Thank you 🤩
Oh this looks so much like your own style. Did you train AI to use your style?
Another beautifull one. Cant wait for the next one :-)
Awwww thank you!!!! Cool to see you here on YT!!
the resemblance of these valkyrie to two of my own characters is uncanny. it almost feels like im receiving fanart lol
Omg, that is indeed uncanny 🙈🤣
Madame.. the AI your using produces images derived from training data that uses millions of art works scoured from the internet..if you use them as references you are in essence reproducing art already created from other artist..I would abandon such a practice and continue to use your own wonderful and amazing imagination and skill..
I’ve been working professionally as a designer and illustrator for nearly 30 years. I use AI daily. All of us have been using references in our work since the inception of fine art; be it photography or other artists’ work. Do a reverse image search for the reference materials she’s used, and I guarantee you won’t find a match. Meaning this reference is far removed from the numerous images it used in its training algorithm. The ideology that generative AI is copying artwork is staggeringly misunderstood. Before you start denigrating other professionals, learn how it works and learn why artists were actually up in arms about how these tools work.
also the environmental impact it has on our planet is horrendous. The energy it takes to keep those servers up is eating through our resources and helping climate change.
Have a look at my blog post to learn about my stance on AI 🥰 lioba.info/painting-blog/2024/6/16/my-stance-on-ai-art
I am not a huge fan of AI but it doesn't make sense to me to say that someone is reproducing art by using compiled images from AI. Artists have been taking inspiration from other artists for centuries. People have been doing what she did in photoshop without AI for years. Surely there is a better argument against AI than that.
May we see some of your original Art?
Your technique is really amazing but I want to ask in the most kind way it’s possible. What’s even the point of painting already existing picture with all the mistakes AI makes, even in the video itself you had to fix the leg problem, when initially you plan without AI it’s easier to avoid the mistakes the ai generative software makes which is bad anatomy, bad lighting, bad composition and so on.
Working with AI helps me creating referenc photos easier - if you just want to create a 'picture' for example to have it printed or for a product illustration, you absolutely don't need to paint it. But with original art the beauty lies in the creation process and how the artist translated the image into the physical medium of paint. It's one of a kind and can't be replicated. (The physical artwork that is) If you want to have something really meaningful and special in your home, a original artwork that is created only for you is the best thing you could have! 😊 Hope that made sense! 🥰
@@LiobaBrueckner I kind of understand the physical painting point of view but don’t understand the rest. Does that mean a digital painting without help of using generative AI software is worth less than physical painting made with paints and academic skills and techniques made with help of gen. AI software? I think something is wrong with that especially if the software in question works only because of stolen art of thousands of living artists in databases. I still don’t get what’s the point of doing a copy of mix of art that wasn’t made by artist that uses it because this software makes collages of stolen art it even tries to copy signatures and fails at that, what’s the point of using digital image generated with all mistakes this software makes, why fix mistakes of AI while instead there are resources for art creation without the mistakes this software makes.
Why is everyone crying about her using AI for her references? It's the same as if she would took images from Pinterest, Shutterstock etc to put together a reference in photoshop and then draw it like that. You always put your own thoughts, experience and style to it - doesn't matter what kind of reference you use. Nothing weird or wrong about it. And everytime I see someone crying about the use of AI they probably have no idea how easier it makes your work when you're a person who works as an artist like Lioba or as a designer like me.
I love your work either way - keep it up.
🥹🩷🩷🩷
Thank you, I just left a reply to someone else’s comment explaining the ai process in detail. It is a bit of a long read but I feel that many are missing out on a very useful tool that can help an artist. I think there is a lot of misinformation out there about ai. Like any tool it can be abused but it can also be used appropriately and can greatly help an artist in their source creations. If we keep sharing how it can be used appropriately, which I feel this artist did, I hope we can show people how beneficial it can be. It’s great to find someone else out there that realizes this! ❤❤❤
I clicked to learn the special technique but after ten minutes, no technique. Just an ad for Skillshare and Patreon
Не покидает ощущение , что рисует кто то другой , сама девушка все неряшливо и коряво вырисовывает ,а потом бац !! смена кадра и .. все прилично, заглажено, улучшено , и девушка опять корявые линии выводит 🤔
Interesting video, but I'm disappointed about the use of Ai. There's good technique but I don’t have much respect for the image.
I can respect your opinion however in my opinion, and personal experience, artists get inspiration by looking at other art. Ai can look at Valkyrie from billions of sources creating something unique. The artist then takes that image and alters it to look like the image in their head. Then the artist uses that as a reference for their painting.
We can be angry that ai is more efficient at gathering references than we are, but we humans do the exact same. Have you played around with the ai generators at all? You should when you have a moment, they are helpful but tricky. To create exactly what you want you need a good prompt. You typically pay for each image you generate, you need to generate a LOT to make a source for your painting. You learn quickly that how you phrase your prompt is key. Yes, you could totally put in “Sunflower in blue sky in the style of Rembrandt’ however that’s not what most artists are doing. We are creating elaborate queries that span styles we like with subjects we like to create a unique image. We then take that image and alter it dozens of times. You won’t get normal looking hands, often body parts do weird angles, ai does weird stuff lol. So we take the images we like then alter them in photoshop. often doing things like this artist mentioned, taking photos from our own hands/feet/face/elbow lol, and then adding this to the created image.
All of this is a ton of work that goes into a source image to paint from. It is no different from the other method I do of scrolling through Pinterest to make a folder of a hundred inspirational paintings that fit the style of what I’m thinking of, combining that with the folder of reference photos of say, a lady’s face or body and some images of cool trees I like etc. then I dump all images into Photoshop and start hacking away to create a reference image I want.
I do take a ton of photos to use sad reference but I do a lot of surreal work which gets wonky sometimes. Anyway, this long post is really boiling down to this. I don’t want artists to miss out on a great tool. Most recently I was needing a good surreal moon reference, I wanted a face on it. I input my sketch of a moon with a face to the generator, added some prompts, 40ish images later I got something interesting that I could work with. I then altered that image in PS and added it to my source image I am building. It is an excellent tool to help you get started on a source. Can it be abused to “create” a new book about astrology that literally copies chunks of other books? Yes. Can it pull info from other artists work to help it create an image? Yes. Can I do the exact same thing for my source? Yes. Should we be responsible artists using a great tool that can help us create more unique images? In my opinion, absolutely.
In my art classes there was a section that was titled “steal like an artist” it referred to a book by the same name. We take inspiration from other artists constantly. This can help someone with an idea in their head get it fleshed out.
I’m not sure what medium you work in but I would encourage you to play with ai before making a judgement. Every artist friend that I have spoken to that was anti ai has been wonderful and actually listened to my side as well as played with ai. Some made the decision to not use ai because their current source making method works better for them. Others changed their mind to “Like any tool, if properly used, it can be an asset to the artist, like any tool it can be abused, but we should not judge an artist for using it properly’.
I do hope you will take a moment to play with one of the generators. It may be helpful to your art, or not, but it should help you understand what the tool is and what it isn’t.
Sorry this was so long lol. Thanks!
@@JaeElle Thanks for the in-depth reply. I can see you're passionate about the subject, so please don't take my disagreement as personal attack.
I understand the argument that artists source images via reference photos, or images from other artists, and I understand some may see this akin to what AI is doing. I disagree with this wholeheartedly. When you're collecting sources and references from other artists; that's "you" that's interpreting the material. You reference images because something the artist created resonated with you, whether that's the composition, technique, colors etc. Or with photos, something about the photo spoke to you; whether it's the texture, or simply it's a good reference photo with good lighting; but let's be honest, no one is using AI to search what a fox looks like.
I think by letting AI take over more of the process, artists are taking away from themselves. It's not their brain that's generating the image. I don't believe anyone who says, "AI just created what was in my head!" That's a lie; the artist settled for what's close enough or settled for something else that was given to them.
If someone is using ai, then heck, why not let AI just do the whole darn thing for you.
Type in a prompt (even if typing creatively is hard), get an image, then send it off to a print shop to have them print on a canvas for you. BAM, that's a new age
artist for you. "What's the difference, I'm still creating something; just doing it more efficiently."
This is of course, my opinion and my outlook. To reiterate, I think by letting AI take over more of the process, artists are taking away from themselves; and I don't respect that.
@@mikekarcz2516 I can see where you're coming from. I can respect that completely. I may disagree because I feel the issue is way more complex than that however I can see what you're saying.
I appreciate you explaining your point of view! Always nice to have a civil conversation with someone on the web with different ideas.
@@mikekarcz2516 "AI just created what was in my head!" is not a lie. Once you know how it works and get proficient with it you can get to the image that's in your head. It takes some effort, but it's definitely not a lie. However AI images often have a lot of mistakes that you'd have to fix if you want to use them for a real product. You can do that i've you're experienced with AI generators and know how the important extensions work, but that's quite a learning effort and most AI images are made by hobbyists who just want a pretty picture. As a result they're obvously subpar.
ArtistHate is leaking...
Using AI? what a shame
Shame? For using references, for making your life easier, your working progress faster? You’re one of those people who say using a foto instead of real sitter is wrong? She made something unique and beautiful. Jealousy does not suit you.
literally my face fell when she said that. Its not as impressive now.
@@Numinosan Using AI for ref image is the same as using stolen money for a charity pledge.
No matter how good or bad you use stolen money for, it's still stolen money. People still get robbed and damaged.
Plus the use of those stolen money will encourage those thief to steal even more.
@@huymaivan8671I do understand the concerns about AI. But all forget the simplest thing: there is nothing new! Not one thing drawn, written, shown on tv. Every story was told before, every picture existed in a way somewhere else. She added, she changed, made it her own visual expression of something that existed before but in her light. As every other artist does. This is the age of merging. The universe is connecting dots that were far apart but now are not. Instead of complaining about the things you can’t change anymore, use it and own it.
@@Numinosan In your logic, there'll be no new song because they all use the same kind of note.
No new book because they all use the same letter system.
So every book can be steal, every song can be steal, and there's no copyright at all.
Doesn't sound so right, is it?
I mean, it is certainly stunning and impressive technique, but for the life of me I cannot fathom how any artist could use AI this way. It is like a dancer using a robot to do the actual dancing. I come to art to see what the human hand, heart, and soul are capable of....not what a computer helped the artist to conceive. It is like taking steroids.
For the life of me i cannot fathom why you seek out people to be mad at.
@lostgarbage4055 art is discussion, you silly person. What do you think they did in the cafes of Paris? Drink Chai Tea Lattes and worry about tone policing?
@@DejanOfRadic well, if you don't think it's art - why discuss it?
@@lostgarbage4055 because it is the most pressing and disruptive trend in contemporary art. Perhaps you should be asking yourself a similar question. If you cannot participate in a conversation, but instead attempt to invalidate the very idea of conversation itself....what is your shtick?
Perhaps in the future, make a sincere attempt to refute my arguement. Here's an example that you could have used: Renaissance painters secretly used Camera Obscra devices to project images onto canvas, tracing them by had and painting the drawing. How is AI different? Both approaches are using technology to speed things up.
@@DejanOfRadic nah, thanks, i'll just waste your time so you have less energy to with hunt people.
what easel do you use please
Just a regular wooden one, it doesn't have a brand 🥰
@@LiobaBrueckner where did you buy it
This isn't art, this is unethical art theft.
It looks like we're all using AI to get the poses for reference at least.
I'm glad to see that other artists do this, it doesn't make me feel like I'm cheating 😂
no "we" dont xD
@vasilisvks1448 yeah, let me rephrase that - a lot of artists....
Artists now have what the big ones had for century's. Models that pose for them in any pose they want...in this video I see exactly that, artist painting by looking at the models she put in pose she wanted, only cheaper version of it...
Good job, you can copy AI. Do not consider this original art.
Thank you for responding and the link to your stance on AI art. Big corporations are already using AI art to replace graphic designers..putting them out of work..another issue is the process of creation through struggle..failure..and evolving as an artist..AI will produce images that equal or surpass human creations without the struggles and failures. How will we compete when AI offers faster..cheaper images than what we can provide to the audience..when they develop a sophisticated robot arm that can lay down brush strokes with the care and skill of the best human artist..game over..that's around the corner..
Ugh. Did you really had to use AI for that? :/
It looks nice, but AI should be a no-no.
Great execution, but man did you take over a lot of nonsense the AI spat out for the composition. This regurgitation engine is not fit for art in any way and it will never be.
it's so sad, she's just a human color photocopy machine
Ai unf
they caressing themselves? looks like they are caressing each other. why?
They like each other?
I loved the gesture, it could be everything really. 🥰
The first 500 people to use my link skl.sh/liobabrckner07241 will get a 1 month free trial of Skillshare premium! 🥰