Ben Brown DC Diamond Wing “Potato Bug”

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 12 січ 2025

КОМЕНТАРІ • 40

  • @andrewtolley3706
    @andrewtolley3706 3 місяці тому +6

    It looks inherently unstable. But apparently flew well! It would be interesting to see other designs from Ben Brown's drawing-board. Thank you for sharing this little-known aircraft with us.

  • @wingmanjim6
    @wingmanjim6 2 місяці тому +3

    Marvelous !!!!!

  • @neiloflongbeck5705
    @neiloflongbeck5705 3 місяці тому +8

    Wings like that keep coming back.

    • @talesfromthehutandhangar
      @talesfromthehutandhangar  3 місяці тому +2

      Yes nearly 100 years later!

    • @neiloflongbeck5705
      @neiloflongbeck5705 3 місяці тому +3

      @talesfromthehutandhangar check out the Edwatds Rhomboidal Biplane of 1911 for one of the earliest versions of this wing platform that flew.

    • @talesfromthehutandhangar
      @talesfromthehutandhangar  3 місяці тому +2

      @@neiloflongbeck5705 Will do thanks

  • @timgarrett203
    @timgarrett203 3 місяці тому +11

    Strut braced coplanar joined wing. Check out patent #5,899,410!😅

  • @Allan_aka_RocKITEman
    @Allan_aka_RocKITEman 3 місяці тому +5

    Unique looking little airplane...👍

  • @russellwaterson3304
    @russellwaterson3304 3 місяці тому +3

    That is very interesting. It would of had a lot of lift and I wish I knew more about it. Maybe some day someone could try to build something similar. It would be fascinating.

  • @michaelogden5958
    @michaelogden5958 3 місяці тому +4

    Very cool.

  • @fredtedstedman
    @fredtedstedman 2 місяці тому +2

    love it , this would make a great model aeroplane !

  • @randymertens1384
    @randymertens1384 3 місяці тому +3

    Two of the still photos show the Transcontinental &Western Airlines maintenance base and corporate headquarters in the background, placing these photos at Municipal Airport (MKC), Kansas City, Missouri.
    MKC was the commercial airport for Kansas City in 1932. MKC is located about 33 miles east of Lawrence, Kansas.
    There was a lot of light plane building activity in KC in the late twenties and early thirties, including American Eagle, Rearwin, Portfield, Inland Sport, and others. Lots of homebuilt aircraft activity, too.
    My guess is that this was another dream to build a light aircraft company that was destroyed by the Depression.

  • @CAMacKenzie
    @CAMacKenzie 2 місяці тому +1

    It's a conjoined tandem-wing triplane. I thought of something like that, but with only 2 wings conjoined. And, unlike this guy, I never built it.

  • @leifvejby8023
    @leifvejby8023 3 місяці тому +4

    That was lovely, thanks for the upload!!

  • @DataRew
    @DataRew 3 місяці тому +4

    WAIT, THIS CAME OUT OF LAWRENCE, KS!? I WENT TO COLLEGE THERE (and still live fairly close)!!!!! I'm gonna have to do some digging now.

  • @ivanhicks887
    @ivanhicks887 2 місяці тому +1

    Amazing - Should have had a Interest future Thankyou for the presentation

  • @johnjephcote7636
    @johnjephcote7636 3 місяці тому +2

    A circle or a fully circular wing has occured elsewhere but this one has a very wide pair of struts adding to the lift. the pusher airscrew is unusual for a small kite such as this.

  • @Joewho99
    @Joewho99 2 місяці тому +1

    Interesting video thanls for posting

  • @jimroberts3009
    @jimroberts3009 3 місяці тому +6

    They sure had some bizarre aircraft designs in the inter war period. Back then everything seemed to have been tried. If it flew, it flew. If it didn't well never mind, try again.

  • @jfu5222
    @jfu5222 3 місяці тому +3

    I'd call it a conjoined tri-plane. Weird!

  • @Deviation4360
    @Deviation4360 3 місяці тому +1

    Convergent tipped triplane?

  • @kidmohair8151
    @kidmohair8151 3 місяці тому +4

    i'm stuck trying to figure out...why??

    • @talesfromthehutandhangar
      @talesfromthehutandhangar  3 місяці тому +2

      Why not & it worked !

    • @kidmohair8151
      @kidmohair8151 2 місяці тому +1

      @@talesfromthehutandhangar after a bit of research, it seems that such wings are more aerodynamically efficient, at least on a small scale.
      more to come, i'm sure.

  • @Robutube1
    @Robutube1 3 місяці тому +3

    I presume that I'm not alone in being left guessing what advantages/performance characteristics that wing design conferred upon this aircraft. Perhaps the absence of widespread adoption of the design tells us?

    • @talesfromthehutandhangar
      @talesfromthehutandhangar  3 місяці тому +1

      But they are going down a similar route today.

    • @kidmohair8151
      @kidmohair8151 3 місяці тому +1

      me too...

    • @talesfromthehutandhangar
      @talesfromthehutandhangar  3 місяці тому +1

      @@kidmohair8151 but he tried and it worked. Very outside the box thinking.

    • @Robutube1
      @Robutube1 3 місяці тому +2

      @@hughn Thanks for this extra information Hugh. It is amusing to see a paper from 1985 describing it as "a new type of aircraft configuration" - I think Ben Brown might have had something to say about that😁.

  • @EricCoop
    @EricCoop 2 місяці тому +2

    Also, forget looking French. Ben Brown could well have been a British name. The plane looks like it could've been British. But Americans are kinda British by heritage and our political system has not evolved much past the Tudor system, so there's that.