Louis Armstrong, t / John Thomas, tb / Johnny Dodds, cl / Lil Armstrong, p / Johnny St. Cyr, bj, g / Pete Briggs, bb / Baby Dodds, d. Chicago, May 11, 1927.
I have enough recorded music from the 20s, 30s, and 40s to play non-stop around the clock for 3 weeks... literally. I love all of this stuff. Thanks for sharing.
Will you explain what "arseno" means in "arsenokoitai"? (Hope I got all that spelling correct.). I have an idea but I would like to hear (read) your idea. It seems that you and your disputant are arguing about whether having an urge and acting on the urge are effectively the same or are distinct enough. I don't think most straight or LGBTQ people would be comfortable with that argument, or those terms. How much same sex is compatible with Paul's condemnation? If we simply disagree with condemning people on the basis of consensual non-harmful acts, regardless of what Paul says about specific acts, then I think we should simply say so. We don't have to agree with Paul or with any interpretations of Paul that might seem reasonable to a lot if people. Mike
So amazing, jazz at its best. So grateful 2 be hearing it again after so many yesrs.❤
Wonderful Jazz by Louis and wonderful sound by Atticus! Thank you!!! :^D 🎺 LP
I have enough recorded music from the 20s, 30s, and 40s to play non-stop around the clock for 3 weeks... literally.
I love all of this stuff. Thanks for sharing.
Another immortal tune by the great Louis Armstrong and his band!!!
Wonderful clarity ~ such fun to listen to! Thank you for uploading all these fantastic early jazz recordings!
Grande, il più grande. Grazie atticus
Will you explain what "arseno" means in "arsenokoitai"? (Hope I got all that spelling correct.). I have an idea but I would like to hear (read) your idea.
It seems that you and your disputant are arguing about whether having an urge and acting on the urge are effectively the same or are distinct enough. I don't think most straight or LGBTQ people would be comfortable with that argument, or those terms. How much same sex is compatible with Paul's condemnation?
If we simply disagree with condemning people on the basis of consensual non-harmful acts, regardless of what Paul says about specific acts, then I think we should simply say so. We don't have to agree with Paul or with any interpretations of Paul that might seem reasonable to a lot if people.
Mike