Це відео не доступне.
Перепрошуємо.

Night Crawler Weapon Test: RPM & Current Draw

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 12 чер 2024
  • Here's how I test my bots to better understand current draw, weapon speed, and component performance. In this video, I'm testing Night Crawler before the Motorama 2024 competition. The bot is bolted to a heavy base for safety.
    Since I'm running a relatively small battery (1300mAh, 6s), I can't run the weapon throttle full blast for 3 minutes. Theoretically, I need to average 26amps continuous to burn through 1300mAh in three minutes. 20 amps is a good target to leave some wiggle-room.
    The test hardware here runs the throttle in 20% increments, for 30 seconds each. This lets me know what to expect in terms of current draw and RPM. This also runs the weapon for 2.5 minutes, which is a good stress test. I also measure temperature of the motor, speed controller, and bearings after each test run.
    After these tests, I decided to configure the controller for 60% "Low Speed" and 80% "High Speed" settings. Past competitions have taught me that 80% throttle is almost too much, the gyro forces cause some real driving challenges. I'll save that 80% (or 100%) throttle for those truly difficult opponents.
    Learn more about Night Crawler here:
    / teamcosmosbots
    www.teamcosmos.com

КОМЕНТАРІ • 4

  • @bami2
    @bami2 Місяць тому +2

    The ring light is showing weapon power/PWM requested from the receiver/transmitter?
    I love how this shows the exponential relation between sustaining speed and current/power draw.
    4k rpm -> ~2.5A, 6.3k rpm -> ~6.3A, 8.8k rpm -> ~14.5A, 10.5k rpm -> ~23A, 11.1k rpm -> ~30A
    So for every 2k rpm increase you're about doubling the power required. Very informative!

    • @PeteCovert
      @PeteCovert  Місяць тому +3

      The receiver doesn't come into play here. The ring light is sending out the PWM signals itself, that way it's completely repeatable each time. Originally I was manually moving the throttle, but it was hard to be consistent between runs.

    • @jamisongo
      @jamisongo Місяць тому +1

      @@PeteCovert super cool. i bet you could productize that

  • @tedz74
    @tedz74 6 місяців тому

    Ludacris speed!