Excellent job brother! I was wondering when someone was going to address the Schuenemann study and its bogus conclusion. I hope you do decide to look into why this "study "always pops up when someone Googles the ethnicity of the ancient Egyptians, especially when you consider the fact that that's not even what the study was designed to do. I'm pretty sure you'd find some shady sh-t going on. Once again, great job and I can't wait to read what kind of foolishness "those folks"have to say as a response to this video. They never cease to amuse and amaze me
all the ancient greek philosphers wrote who the ancients of africa were. they werent pale arabs and turkish colonizers. lol why do the modern egyptians ignore the walls,artifacts, and, bust & carvings?
From the quantity of research that you do ,to the amount of time you dedicate to your craft and the level of quality of your work is very much appreciated it.
@The_Reality_Filter yes. The easily debunkable nonsensical narrative that so-called historians have put forth as real history, That can be easily debunked by doing a deep research, just like this channel has done and given us a real cohesive historical narrative.
I am a 78 y.o. white American US male. I never gave much thought about it, I just assumed that the majority of Africans were black skinned which became lighter around the Mediterranean coast...including Egyptians. The history of the races (for lack of a better term) is fascinating. However, with man's propensity to alter history to suit his own needs or ideology it is difficult to sort truth from fiction. This video was most informative and left me wanting to follow and learn more.
What shocks me is the fact that Egypt is literally in Africa. Why is it shocking that ancient Egyptians were African? Like the rest of Africa, Egypt was invaded by Arabs and Europeans.
@@TeeEm24 only racist people think like that. Yes we egyptians are african but we don't look like sub saheran. Funny how africa is the second biggest continent but u think we all look sub saheran. Europens don't look a like.again stop being racist and be proud of ur real roots and stop trying to steal my culture
This is only a reasonable conclusion IF you are under the belief that ALL of Africa was black. News flash.. there are MANY ethnic groups on Africa. If you are under the belief that North African only became brown after Middle Eastern and European migration into North African then your wrong.. actually we KNOW that the Egyptians WERE NOT black and then slowly got lighter BECAUSE there was a test done that studied the genome of an Egyptian mummy from the 2,000BC period and not only did they find EVEN LESS Sub-Suharran (black) DNA in his genome compared to the amount found in modern Egyptians BUT ACTUALLY also found MORE European (Caucasoid) DNA (7%) in this mummy. Also, I said "they found even LESS" Sub-Suharran, or Black, DNA then found in Egyptians TODAY.. So not only does this contradict the "Egyptians turned from black to brown/white" narrative.. but research have already pinpointed the period of the rise in Sub-Suharran DNA (black) within modern Egyptians as starting during the Saharan slave trade around 1,000bc and also around the time of Muslim expansion. Btw.. by "Muslim expansion" I mean the spread of Islam and NOT the spread and migration of Arabs.
I think It's "shocking" because the level of technology of ancient Egypt (as well as ancient Nubia and Ethiopia) does not seem to be reflected in the rest of Africa
During my first trip to Egypt in 2019, a dark skinned Nubian man, whispered in my ear and said, "Are you African American? I said, yes. He said, Welcome Home." They know who we are!
Yes they know? The book states you were on the top and pushed to the bottom but you will once more be on the top. Those on the top hate you and refuse for you to rise again., but you will!! Halle!
Did you cry? Did you choke up? Did you feel it? I did when I read your comment. It is amazing how important it is to have a tribe's man to have a homeland. A home..... They knew who they stole.
UNESCO as we should recall were initially very resistant to the notion of Black Kemet. It took the genius work and DNA sample of mummies taken by the mindblowingly supergenius intellect of our Dr. Cheikh Ante Diop to push them toward the Black Alkebulan truth. And. Dr. Diop uncovered the term "Alkebulan" which is one of the true ancient names for the continent miscalled "Africa".
Genetics don’t lie and neither do the paintings and artifacts themselves. Thank you for the due diligence and Justice to true human history. Herodotus and Greeks who studied in Ancient Egypt never hid this truth. Wishing you continued success and wealth!
@@scaberouswretch3673 that’s only because white people were there too mostly as visitors and invaders. There were Asian mummies found also.Y’all really believe ancient Egyptians were white? Even the ancient Greeks who were actually there documented that they were black with wooly hair. Why is that so hard for y’all to believe?
People have been occupying and invading those lands for thousands of years. At some point, especially during the Hellenistic period, there were lighter skinned people living in Egypt as well. Its not hard to think that a culture that spans almost 6k plus years wouldn't have attracted people from all over the known world at that time. @@scaberouswretch3673
@jablum77 There were waves of migration from middle east at a time when islamists waged war on the idol worshipping. What is lost in the Muslim text is that it was a racial war that drove all blacks from the middle east. They were referred to as kaffirs... The last drove to arrive in current Yoruba land are the Ijebus. Some settled in Sudan region also. At the same time, Egypt was pushing out their blacks which were majorly in the immediate south of the Sahara like the Hausa, Fula or Fulani, etc. Some came to settle in Yoruba land also... my ppl. Research Lamurudu and Oduduwa, you will find more materials
But Mizraim (Originaly Egypt) is Now known as Missouri USA in present day! Which was the area Hams progeny went to Build like Moundbuild'n Masons & Farm like Agricultural Chemists - in This place also known as Kemet/Khamet ("Land of the Blacks," or Terra Pretor/Black Earth)...
@@exalteduchiha1563Book source: "When Rocks Cry Out", the author (horace butler) proved it IS in america. He was offered 6 figures by National Geographic to purchase his book & findings which he turned down. They, of course, ran his name through the mud as a result. Watch his interviews talking about it. Much of this is Old news btw.
I was in a rug store some time ago and a guy working in there, who looked so called “Middle Eastern” or from somewhere in that area, asked me out of the blue, “are you Egyptian?” I said no, why? He replied, “because you look like how real Egyptians look.” I never forgot that and wish I would have further questioned him.
We were in Egypt last month on a cruise. My husband was asked whether he is an Egyptian, some even started talking to him in Arabic without hesitation thinking that he is local Egyptian!!! We are from India (Indian Americans!). We love Egyptians!! 🥰🥰
Most likely because in Southern Egypt there are still black Egyptians. The northern region of Egypt was invaded numerous times. The Egyptians in southern Egypt resemble the ancestors the most because invaders didn’t invade that deep into Egypt. If you ever see the people of southern Egypt you’ll notice they are eerie similar in person to African Americans and other African cultures.
One thing we know for sure is us East Afrikans created Ancient Nubia and Ancient Egypt and Kush. We still speak the language, even today, we refer to our leaders as 'Kufu', 'Mtu-Kufu'. The god of water that the Ancient Egyptians call Ha-pi has a word we still use today for water here in Kenya and Uganda, pi. We also have the long horned cattle of the Pharaohs. Dr. Ben Jochnnan said Nubia is the mother of Ancient Egypt but Kenya and Uganda are the grandmother of Ancient Egypt.
@@shafsteryellow Somalis, Ethiopians, who follow Christianity, Judaism and Islam are the invaders, these are not Afrikan ancient religion but Arab, Jewish and Greek religions. Bantus have been in Ancient Egypt for 60,000 years, how can Afrikans invade Afrika? You Somalis, Ethiopians are not Afrikan but Arab and Jewish mulattos, just look at your hair. Islam is not Afrikan
Here is the result on G25 of the less distant people to an Egyptian of Old kingdom period : Distance to: Egypt_OldKingdom:I6409 Sample (Coordinates : 0.029665247,0.13868540,-0.047587444,-0.14426329,-0.0022221347,-0.063518622,-0.014261081,-0.013556098,0.087986490,0.0041161682,-0.0028172711,-0.019512651,0.055365686,0.0068209691,0.0071103512,0.014172621,-0.0011899901,-0.019799603,-0.021658496,0.032836460,-0.0024145371,-0.010472191,-0.0046426664,-0.0034683108,0.0029676763) : 0.06665294 Yemenite_Dhamar:Y382 0.07180916 Yemenite_Mahra:Y326 0.07237610 Egypt_Old_Middle_Kingdom:I10020 0.07347411 Yemenite_Amran:Y542 0.07355550 Yemenite_Dhamar:Y036 0.07409015 BedouinB:HGDP00624 0.07453930 Yemenite_Dhamar:Y038 0.07454369 BedouinB:HGDP00651 0.07494247 Yemenite_Mahra:Y345 0.07549846 Yemenite_Al_Jawf:Y221 No one is Black African. Dynastic Egypt wasn't black but very mixed: => Nakht-Ankh - Deir Rifeh cemetery, Middle Egypt (3829 ybp) : Haplogroup H-Z19080. => TT320-CCG61065 - Valley of the Kings (3360ybp) : Haplogroup J-L267. => KV62 - Valley of the Kings (3285 ybp) : Haplogroup R-M343. => KV46Y - Valley of the Kings (3360 ypb) : G-P15. => Unknown Man E - Deir el Bahari (Royal Egypt) : Haplogroup E-V38. Here are the G25 result of Nakht-Ankh (0.0012,0.129,-0.044,-0.0965,-0.0031,-0.0534,-0.017,-0.0078,0.0551,-0.0049,0.0138,-0.0172,0.0306,-0.0015,0.0069,-0.0072,-0.0111,0.0053,-0.004,0.0042,-0.0012,0.0046,-0.0078,0.0026,-0.0013) : Distance to: Egyptian_1879bc:Nakht-Ankh 0.03738170 Egyptian:Egypt1AQ172 0.03746435 Egyptian:Egypt15AQ172 0.03825737 Egyptian:Egypt5AQ172 0.04069069 Sarah_Coptic 0.04156682 Egyptian:Egypt7AQ172 0.04232390 Egyptian:Egypt17AQ176 0.04328952 Egyptian:2AJ137 0.04453109 Egyptian:Egypt12AQ172 0.04459642 Egyptian:4AJ136 0.04474741 Egyptian:12AJ129 You have restarted the Afrocentric propaganda machine. So called African-Americans don't think, they will tell you yes, Amen.
@@shafsteryellow Unfortunately, you’ve been lied to. DNA test done by DNA tribes proved the ancient Egyptians were black. Geneticist have also done Hair studies & skin tone studies which also proved they were black. Keep coping, because DNA contradicts your lies.🫵🤣🤣🤣
I'm a white woman in my mid 70's, from the UK. Since my earliest days as a child and with a fascination of ancient Egypt the images and statues absolutely convinced me that the Pharaohs and people's of Egypt were black. I never had any doubt whatsoever. My beliefs caused me many problems during my school years as I stubournly refused to accept the blatantly ridiculous teachings or withdraw my remarks. My education was pretty standard but in my spare time I researched so much and always hoped that the proof would be discovered within my lifetime and here it is! What a splendid lineage for the black people. Thank you for this brilliant presentation and confirming my 70+ years of belief.
@withoutHistory Here is the result on G25 of the less distant people to an Egyptian of Old kingdom period : Distance to: Egypt_OldKingdom:I6409 Sample (Coordinates : 0.029665247,0.13868540,-0.047587444,-0.14426329,-0.0022221347,-0.063518622,-0.014261081,-0.013556098,0.087986490,0.0041161682,-0.0028172711,-0.019512651,0.055365686,0.0068209691,0.0071103512,0.014172621,-0.0011899901,-0.019799603,-0.021658496,0.032836460,-0.0024145371,-0.010472191,-0.0046426664,-0.0034683108,0.0029676763) : 0.06665294 Yemenite_Dhamar:Y382 0.07180916 Yemenite_Mahra:Y326 0.07237610 Egypt_Old_Middle_Kingdom:I10020 0.07347411 Yemenite_Amran:Y542 0.07355550 Yemenite_Dhamar:Y036 0.07409015 BedouinB:HGDP00624 0.07453930 Yemenite_Dhamar:Y038 0.07454369 BedouinB:HGDP00651 0.07494247 Yemenite_Mahra:Y345 0.07549846 Yemenite_Al_Jawf:Y221 No one is Black African. Dynastic Egypt wasn't black but very mixed: => Nakht-Ankh - Deir Rifeh cemetery, Middle Egypt (3829 ybp) : Haplogroup H-Z19080. => TT320-CCG61065 - Valley of the Kings (3360ybp) : Haplogroup J-L267. => KV62 - Valley of the Kings (3285 ybp) : Haplogroup R-M343. => KV46Y - Valley of the Kings (3360 ypb) : G-P15. => Unknown Man E - Deir el Bahari (Royal Egypt) : Haplogroup E-V38. Here are the G25 result of Nakht-Ankh (0.0012,0.129,-0.044,-0.0965,-0.0031,-0.0534,-0.017,-0.0078,0.0551,-0.0049,0.0138,-0.0172,0.0306,-0.0015,0.0069,-0.0072,-0.0111,0.0053,-0.004,0.0042,-0.0012,0.0046,-0.0078,0.0026,-0.0013) : Distance to: Egyptian_1879bc:Nakht-Ankh 0.03738170 Egyptian:Egypt1AQ172 0.03746435 Egyptian:Egypt15AQ172 0.03825737 Egyptian:Egypt5AQ172 0.04069069 Sarah_Coptic 0.04156682 Egyptian:Egypt7AQ172 0.04232390 Egyptian:Egypt17AQ176 0.04328952 Egyptian:2AJ137 0.04453109 Egyptian:Egypt12AQ172 0.04459642 Egyptian:4AJ136 0.04474741 Egyptian:12AJ129 You have restarted the Afrocentric propaganda machine. So called African-Americans don't think, they will tell you yes, Amen.
Yes I am 60 and loved reading about the Egyptians and knew right away that they had to be black because of the hieroglyphics on the walls. White people have never as a race wore braids like black people and in Carthage they would wear braids so I believe a lot of people of that time was black. Jesus in the Bible is describe as wooly hair and bronze in color but people say does it matter. IT does Black people are the most hated people in this world as a race. Jesus said we would be.Why do you think Moses told Pharoah God said let my people go because they were all black including the Pharoah and the slaves.🎉
@@AETorrePuertoYes Black's is the most diverse race we have all shade's of eye's and hair... That's why we so unique yes he is intelligent 🤷🏽prove it wrong
@@kieshamatthews5800 Yes, black is so diverse it is actually the largest group of races compared to the rest of the humans. However, the DNA of ancient North Egyptians, Libians and Berbers is close to that of ancient Canaaneans, Hitites and Mesopotamians, not to any ancient black races. The black Egyptians were the Kushites. Which at some point after the New Kingdom took over the entire Nile for a period. Later rulers were Greek, however, the composition of commoners of norther Caucasian Egyptians and southern black Nubians remained mostly the same. I see it as pointless trying to claim the Mediterranean shores above the Sahara. It's like Turkey. In ancient world Anatolia, the mainland belonged to the Hitites, while the west shores to the Greek which was mostly a bunch of city-States interconnected by sea rather than land. Similarly, Egypt and Mesopotamia was interconnected by river. On the Magreg, the Berbers ruled the land while the Carthageans ruled the shores.
As an art historian, I was told that that the next king had the noses chopped off. Well to heck with that. Proud of you! Finally, overwhelmingly, you blew that out of the water. So, all the people I taught, who worshipped Egypt and Egyptian art, like myself, were in awe of black Egypt, all the while, LOL, like I always from early childhood, in love with the hairstyles, dress and good looks of African people. I am from Carthage, Missouri, where the library housed Carthagenian artifacts. Good thing. Bless all of you.
The problem that statues with broken nose are few and there a lot of statues with its noses intact even though the statues with noses broken still look Egyptian but it seems that you want to falsify the history and fake it to make it suit your claims. all this statues are fitting Modern Egyptians from north of Egypt and south of Egypt even the statues with broken noses fitting the modern egyptians
@@Bella-egyptian1 To there a lot of statues with broken noses... Some archeologists also destroyed ancient artifacts as well to try to cover up the history...
You're not actually wrong, however, timelines are important to note. Ancient Egypt came about looonnnngggg after our species branched out of Africa. 2000 to 3000 years ago is not significantly different from what you observe today. 10000 years ago all people were likely "black", We know the changes were happening around that time. So, the Egyptians today are fairly close to the Egyptians then. This video is full of shit though.
@@jessenoreligionno5731 Unfortunately, you’ve been lied to. DNA test done by DNA tribes proved the ancient Egyptians were black. Geneticist have also done Hair studies & skin tone studies which also proved they were black. Keep coping, because DNA contradicts your lies.🫵🤣🤣🤣
Thank you ❤ When people finally realize they loose nothing telling the truth about Ancient Egypt is when we will finally be able to move forward and even greater as a whole. This was truthful and beautiful. ❤
The truth is Herodotus (Greek historian), writing more than 2,500 years ago.. according to him, Egyptians totally renounced any connection whatsoever to the Afriocan race. And if one looks at the history of Sub-Saharan black and Egyptians, that further tells us that there was absolutely no connection whatsoever. Sub-Saharan ppl never produced anything of wealth, they never built anything other than what could be quickly made from twigs and sticks, they did not possess the abilities to read and write. Nor did they even possess the knowledge of the wheel. When Europeans arrived in Africa in 1500 AD era...it was as if time had stood still for over ten thousand years. To acquire whit man's material items (linen was the big item of trade) thAfricans invented the slave trade.
@@Stoney1959 Total utter racist lie. How do you get that ignorant? The funny thing is you somehow think you are superior. Well you know what they say, "The dumber they are... the more they vote for Trump."
@@ryancharles4031 LOL A little intuitive thought... You see, peoples of sub-Saharan Arica *produced no wealth,* no coinage, no monetary system; and no physical structures other than huts made of twigs and sticks. . So there ws no ledgers of course to document his real wealth (again, no ability to read/write/ do arithmetic). This is yet another FAKE history invention to puff african. This guy likely never existed - since there is no record of his existence. Wikipedia is also in on the FAKE history..
VERY Informative and extremely in depth descriptions. The fact that you ask any who has an opposing view to back up their opinion with citing sources for their opinion is what makes me appreciate this post even more!
I've always suspected that the damages in almost all the Egyptian Pharaoh's statues noses were deliberate to conceal the true ethnicity identity of them
@TeeTeeX290 No the reason was Iconoclasm *Deface the god, kill his power.* A Muslim imam was the one who ordered the nose of the Sphinx to be pried off. This action caused a riot and the Sultan had the imam put to death. This was centuries before Napoleon was in Egypt ISIS did the same thing to the winged bulls and lions (with a human head) found in Babylon and Assyria (Iraq and Syria) BTW: Islam was not and still is not a benign force in regards to Blacks. The East African and Central African slave trade (to the headwaters of the Congo, etc) sent millions into slavery during the early days of Islam to Arabia and during the entire span of the Ottoman empire. It lasted many more centuries longer than the Transatlantic slave trade. Furthermore, Muslims in Sudan still enslave the Christian and Pagan Blacks within greater Sudan (Sudan, Darfur, South Sudan) The same occurs in Ethiopia and the Horn of Africa. [Slavery is alive and well in Africa as well as in Saudi Arabia.-- To this day. Also, the messenger called Mohammad was an enslaver as well as a robber, murderer and pedophile.
Noses in every cultures statues break off. Is this like your first time ever looking into history? The fact that this was upvoted is sad. Noses break off on statues because they’re relatively exposed. Any sort of fall, the first thing that hits the ground is the nose. In weather, things erode and the fist thing to fall off would be a nose or any other exposed bits. Imagine being this dumb.
(1) How is this relevant to the topic? (2) Whose last days? The last days of the country of Judea ended early in the first century AD (CE) by order of a Roman emperor. Dan was written before the compilation of the Judaic scriptures in the 5th C. BC (BCE). There is no way any prophet at that time not only could, or be interested in writing about something that might happen more than 2,500+ years later. He was writing to his own people. In the 5th C. BC (BCE), when the written compilation of what Christians call the Old Testament, was made at the order of a king, they would not have included writings of someone they considered so crazy to predict the literal future, and more importantly, nor would they have found any relevance to their current lives. They included inspirational and historical religious teachings attributed to their venerable hero, Moses and respected prophets. They would and could not have imagined that the writings were intended for people all over the earth in an unbelievably remote future. Nor would the prophet Dan, originally. What does the "end of days" even mean, then or now? I submit it is simply another way of saying, "in the great by and by" or "someday". It is a statement of faith. NOT a prediction of the future.
Discussing the hair made me want to cry, because I am 66 years and I and my descendants have been mocked for having kinky curly hair and not being allowed to wear our historical hairstyles without it being considered inappropriate for the work place.
Your rights are in the law books and so therefore you have to look it up... Know what your rights are and then you'll have power over those who are oppressing you...🤔
This should give clues as to their colllective fear of who we really are. People dont go thru this much trouble (such as banning our books & history in schools, & still worried about our natural hair & hairstyles in 2024?) for their inferiors? Common sense should tell us you also dont copy or emulate your inferiors either.
Are you trying to say that white people today hate black people.but also secretly are jealous of "black" American culture? If so, that's a pretty ballsy statement when most B ppl are wearing European brand clothing (Gucci, Prada, Adidas, Nike, Versace) while at the same time wearing bring blonde/ginger red weaves and hair dye or ACTUALLY buying hair actual hair lol Take it easy with all that because it is REALLY easy to use it against ya.
Has anyone else noticed that in copies of ancient Egyptian art sold to people around the world, the copies made in Egypt all have darker skin tones than the ones made in the west? Artwork in the west usually make Egyptians in artwork look white.
@@ramseyebryant because then they would have to admit to themselves and others that the whole one race being better than others is . . . Baloney. If you delve far enough into some older history books, you will not believe the mind pretzels white people used to twist their minds into in order to explain everything cool on the continent of Africa had to be invented by mysterious white people. (Arabs need not apply. Not white enough.) I caught the tail end of this when one of my elementary teachers told our class, "Africa has no history." They literally used to teach that. At about 9 years of age, I wasn't buying it. I figured maybe it was really OLD history and someone had lost the records or something because of the history being so old.
Listen whenever you go to European countries such as Italy, Germany, England and so forth. You will always be subjugated with the real and the true influence of people and scholars of black economic mexicity. With no qualms about it. It is only here when you reach the Americas and places around that have a casting system that you will meet the fate of scholars that were black. In the beginning of time who have turned d*** there. European, as they have clung onto hope through the eyes of Europeans, european people have always been popular with creating their own despair in their own. Identity and history through pictures books etc be very punctual. Read between the lines as they are always identified with lying. They have been noticed late. Identify with stealing customs cultures, land language, and any other thing they can think of for the sole purpose of taking over. It's a disgusting way of life. But they are the only people on Earth that have been recognized for doing this all over the world and mainly to people of Hebrew, descent or of Afro descent. Peoples that are melanated Indians in such people that don't want to identify with their April lineage. It's and such. They have been notably dishonest about the affluent origin and gene pool of indians, native americans and other scholars that were indigenous to many lands far and wide because of their remark list to be superior
My problem always is, why the hell did the Egyptians draw themselves with such light skin, as compared to the way they drew the Nubians?...I mean...that's the thing that, for me, is always clearly against the idea that the ancient Egyptians were black...it's hard for me to understand how anyone can ignore that fact, lol...were all those drawings from "after the Kehmet period", lol?...
The DNA Tribes study, which used an 8-STR marker analysis to conclude that the royal Egyptian mummies (like those of King Tutankhamun and others) were of Sub-Saharan African ancestry, has been met with substantial skepticism and criticism. There are several key points to consider when evaluating the validity of this study: Background of the DNA Tribes Study DNA Tribes is a private company that offered commercial genetic ancestry analysis using a set of 21 autosomal STR markers. In 2012, DNA Tribes analyzed data from the published results of a 2010 study by Zahi Hawass and his team, which involved the royal mummies, including Tutankhamun and Amenhotep III. The original 2010 study by Hawass et al. had focused on identifying familial relationships among the mummies using a small set of STR markers. DNA Tribes took the allelic data from that study (8 STR markers, not the complete set used by the company) and compared them to their internal database of modern population STR profiles. They then published an analysis suggesting a closer genetic affinity between the mummies and modern Sub-Saharan African populations based on these STR profiles. Major Concerns and Limitations of the DNA Tribes Study Small Number of STR Markers (8 STRs): The analysis was based on only 8 STR markers, which is insufficient for making reliable or detailed conclusions about ancestry or population affinity. As discussed earlier, using just 8 STR markers is problematic due to the limited resolution and potential overlap in allele frequencies across different populations. In the context of ancestry analysis, having so few STR markers can lead to broad and potentially misleading results because it does not capture enough genetic information to differentiate between closely related populations accurately. Allele Frequency Overlap: STRs can exhibit high variability between individuals, but not necessarily in a way that uniquely distinguishes populations. Allele frequency overlaps between groups (especially between geographically proximate populations in North Africa, East Africa, and Sub-Saharan Africa) can make definitive conclusions difficult with such a small set of markers. The database used by DNA Tribes might not have fully accounted for these overlaps, which can lead to conclusions that are skewed or not statistically robust. Interpretation and Statistical Analysis: DNA Tribes compared the allele frequencies of the 8 STR markers to their proprietary database of modern population groups. This database, however, may not have been comprehensive or consistent with other datasets used by the scientific community. In any ancestry analysis, the choice and size of the reference database play a crucial role in the conclusions. Additionally, the methodologies for comparing these allelic frequencies and arriving at conclusions were not well-documented or peer-reviewed in scientific literature, making it hard to evaluate the validity of their claims independently. Context of the Original Data: The 2010 study by Hawass et al. did not aim to study population affinity but rather focused on identifying familial relationships between mummies. The 8 STR markers used in the original study were chosen for forensic and kinship purposes, not for broader population genetics or ancestry conclusions. Using allelic data collected for one purpose (familial relationships) and repurposing it for another (population affinity) can introduce biases or misinterpretations. Lack of Peer Review and Scientific Consensus: The DNA Tribes study was not published in a peer-reviewed scientific journal, which is a significant limitation in terms of scientific credibility. The absence of peer review makes it difficult to assess the study's methods, statistical analyses, and conclusions against established standards in population genetics. The broader scientific community has not accepted the conclusions drawn by DNA Tribes, and reputable scholars in Egyptology and population genetics have questioned the methodology and findings. Ancient DNA Degradation and Contamination Concerns: Ancient DNA studies require careful extraction and analysis methods due to the degraded and often contaminated nature of ancient DNA samples. The reliability of ancient DNA data depends heavily on the quality and authenticity of the DNA extracted. While the 2010 study by Hawass et al. claimed to have extracted authentic DNA from the mummies, ancient DNA research requires highly rigorous protocols to minimize contamination risks. Without direct validation and more comprehensive genetic data, conclusions drawn from such ancient samples remain tentative. Summary: Is the DNA Tribes Study Valid? The DNA Tribes study, which used 8 STR markers to conclude that the royal Egyptian mummies were of Sub-Saharan African affinity, is not considered a scientifically valid or robust study by most population geneticists and Egyptologists. Here’s why: Insufficient Genetic Data: Analyzing only 8 STR markers is not enough to make precise or definitive claims about population ancestry, especially in the context of complex population histories like that of ancient Egypt. Methodological Issues: The methods used by DNA Tribes were not adequately detailed or subjected to peer review. The reliance on a proprietary and potentially incomplete database adds to the concerns. Scientific Consensus: The broader academic community does not support the findings of the DNA Tribes study. Peer-reviewed genetic studies on ancient Egyptian remains often involve larger numbers of markers or SNPs, with more nuanced conclusions about population affinity. While the results of the DNA Tribes analysis are an interesting hypothesis, they do not stand up to scientific scrutiny due to the limited dataset and methodological issues. Thus, its conclusions should be viewed with caution and not taken as definitive evidence of the royal mummies’ ancestry. More comprehensive studies using ancient DNA from multiple mummies and employing genome-wide analysis techniques would be needed to draw reliable conclusions about the ancestry of ancient Egyptians.
I don’t remember where I saw the info, but the oldest pottery shards in Egypt are the same as west Africa at that time. They’re even in a museum sometime(I think).
The DNA Tribes study, which used an 8-STR marker analysis to conclude that the royal Egyptian mummies (like those of King Tutankhamun and others) were of Sub-Saharan African ancestry, has been met with substantial skepticism and criticism. There are several key points to consider when evaluating the validity of this study: Background of the DNA Tribes Study DNA Tribes is a private company that offered commercial genetic ancestry analysis using a set of 21 autosomal STR markers. In 2012, DNA Tribes analyzed data from the published results of a 2010 study by Zahi Hawass and his team, which involved the royal mummies, including Tutankhamun and Amenhotep III. The original 2010 study by Hawass et al. had focused on identifying familial relationships among the mummies using a small set of STR markers. DNA Tribes took the allelic data from that study (8 STR markers, not the complete set used by the company) and compared them to their internal database of modern population STR profiles. They then published an analysis suggesting a closer genetic affinity between the mummies and modern Sub-Saharan African populations based on these STR profiles. Major Concerns and Limitations of the DNA Tribes Study Small Number of STR Markers (8 STRs): The analysis was based on only 8 STR markers, which is insufficient for making reliable or detailed conclusions about ancestry or population affinity. As discussed earlier, using just 8 STR markers is problematic due to the limited resolution and potential overlap in allele frequencies across different populations. In the context of ancestry analysis, having so few STR markers can lead to broad and potentially misleading results because it does not capture enough genetic information to differentiate between closely related populations accurately. Allele Frequency Overlap: STRs can exhibit high variability between individuals, but not necessarily in a way that uniquely distinguishes populations. Allele frequency overlaps between groups (especially between geographically proximate populations in North Africa, East Africa, and Sub-Saharan Africa) can make definitive conclusions difficult with such a small set of markers. The database used by DNA Tribes might not have fully accounted for these overlaps, which can lead to conclusions that are skewed or not statistically robust. Interpretation and Statistical Analysis: DNA Tribes compared the allele frequencies of the 8 STR markers to their proprietary database of modern population groups. This database, however, may not have been comprehensive or consistent with other datasets used by the scientific community. In any ancestry analysis, the choice and size of the reference database play a crucial role in the conclusions. Additionally, the methodologies for comparing these allelic frequencies and arriving at conclusions were not well-documented or peer-reviewed in scientific literature, making it hard to evaluate the validity of their claims independently. Context of the Original Data: The 2010 study by Hawass et al. did not aim to study population affinity but rather focused on identifying familial relationships between mummies. The 8 STR markers used in the original study were chosen for forensic and kinship purposes, not for broader population genetics or ancestry conclusions. Using allelic data collected for one purpose (familial relationships) and repurposing it for another (population affinity) can introduce biases or misinterpretations. Lack of Peer Review and Scientific Consensus: The DNA Tribes study was not published in a peer-reviewed scientific journal, which is a significant limitation in terms of scientific credibility. The absence of peer review makes it difficult to assess the study's methods, statistical analyses, and conclusions against established standards in population genetics. The broader scientific community has not accepted the conclusions drawn by DNA Tribes, and reputable scholars in Egyptology and population genetics have questioned the methodology and findings. Ancient DNA Degradation and Contamination Concerns: Ancient DNA studies require careful extraction and analysis methods due to the degraded and often contaminated nature of ancient DNA samples. The reliability of ancient DNA data depends heavily on the quality and authenticity of the DNA extracted. While the 2010 study by Hawass et al. claimed to have extracted authentic DNA from the mummies, ancient DNA research requires highly rigorous protocols to minimize contamination risks. Without direct validation and more comprehensive genetic data, conclusions drawn from such ancient samples remain tentative. Summary: Is the DNA Tribes Study Valid? The DNA Tribes study, which used 8 STR markers to conclude that the royal Egyptian mummies were of Sub-Saharan African affinity, is not considered a scientifically valid or robust study by most population geneticists and Egyptologists. Here’s why: Insufficient Genetic Data: Analyzing only 8 STR markers is not enough to make precise or definitive claims about population ancestry, especially in the context of complex population histories like that of ancient Egypt. Methodological Issues: The methods used by DNA Tribes were not adequately detailed or subjected to peer review. The reliance on a proprietary and potentially incomplete database adds to the concerns. Scientific Consensus: The broader academic community does not support the findings of the DNA Tribes study. Peer-reviewed genetic studies on ancient Egyptian remains often involve larger numbers of markers or SNPs, with more nuanced conclusions about population affinity. While the results of the DNA Tribes analysis are an interesting hypothesis, they do not stand up to scientific scrutiny due to the limited dataset and methodological issues. Thus, its conclusions should be viewed with caution and not taken as definitive evidence of the royal mummies’ ancestry. More comprehensive studies using ancient DNA from multiple mummies and employing genome-wide analysis techniques would be needed to draw reliable conclusions about the ancestry of ancient Egyptians.
Am a plain Nilotic from Kenya my grand parent didn't have any formal education yet they knew we came from Egypt and we share a lot with people from west Africa in language appearance and Physicality.
@@rockmusic175 You came from Egypt?! Your ancestors didn’t have a single multi level structure until a few decades ago and you want people to believe your ancestors built ancient Egypt.Ancient Egyptians were using the wheeled chariots since 4000 years ago. Your ancestors didn’t know the wheel existed until 150 years ago.How does that make any sense to you?!
@@st3019 Boss when people migrate to new places. They often need to cope with new environment, sometimes their entire way of life is changed. That does not mean it never existed. Wheel was not the only notable thing that existed in ancient Egypt, in fact the wheel was largely used by elites n military.
@@rockmusic175 No Boss , it doesn’t work that way.if you check other migration’s history, in every single case there is stuff that new comers bring to the new place . You can see it when Europeans came to Americas and everywhere. Meanwhile, there is not one single trace of that “ migration to south “ you talk about and you know why ?! Bc that “ migration “ NEVER happened. No multi level building, no written language, no wheeled chariots , no cities. You really think they forgot everything?! Let’s not deceive ourselves boss.
@@rockmusic175 No Boss ! It doesn’t work that way . In every single case when people migrate to new areas they bring the knowledge of techniques and way of life and adopt those to the new environments. You can see that when europeans came to Americas and every other case . Meanwhile, there is not one single trace of that “migration “ you talk about and we all know why . Bc that “ migration “ NEVER happened. No wheeled chariots, no multi level structures, no cities. My Boss , let’s just not deceive ourselves.
@@st3019They were not making a claim and we're barely aware that there was a struggle involved over that heritage. They were just passing their history as they knew it. My grandfather, then about 80 in 1979, told me some of our ancestors came from "Hakum". I asked him where Hakum was and he told me it was north of Esiopia... He knew how to read but was educated to read the Bible and thus was exposes to no other reading material. Well, in 2012, I saw writing talking of some people known as Thagicu who settled on the north of Mt Kenya from Axum in 300 AD. The Kuria on the Kenya-Tanzania state in their myths directly and without a shadow of doubt that they came from Kemet. Again, it's not some claim they are making, just stating their history. They're not asking anyone to believe it
I am glad you are using hard data. I am also glad you are welcoming challenges to your presentation, with the clause that hard data or reasoning on hard data be presented. I was fortunate enough to have personally attended the lectures of Dr. John Henrick Clarke, Professor James Smalls, Dr. Leonard Jefferies, Dr. Wade Nobles, Dr. Ivan van Sertima, Dr. Yosef Ben-Jochannan , Dr Frances Cress Welsing and others. So I yearn for information to presented in a clear and erudite manner. This information needs to be put together in a cohesive and scholarly manner, which you have done. The VISUALS are so important. Keep up the work. Thanks
Sorry, but actual DNA testing on mummified Egyptians shows that ancient Egyptians of 5,000 years ago were not that much different than modern Egyptians of today, and had more genealogical commonality with their Mesopotamian neighbors than with sub-Saharan Africans.
Facts don't care about your blacks are EVERYTHING feelings. There are different races, and we didn't originate in africa. You're not more special than everyone else just because your bLaCk.
@@FreethinkingPharoah It's the truth. Not a single historian or anthropologist will tell you any differently. Your problem is that you bought into that “We Were Kings” BS for so long, you believed it and accepted it just because some social justice warriors with no historical knowledge whatsoever told it to you. While there were African empires founded by black Africans, like the Kushite Dynasty and the Nubian Empire, and the Ghana Empire in western Africa, those civilizations aren't good enough for you. You all wish you could say that you were the ones who built those big pyramids, but Egypt was never yours.
Herodotus described Egyptians as dark skinned with wollyhair like their neighbours to South the Kushites. Unlike present day Europeans Herodotus had no agenda or racial Bias, he just simply described what he saw and what he thought of the people he encountered.
Rewriting History Began with the creation(fabrication) of the so called 'church'...which is also a crazy mess of facts buried in heaps & piles of...untruths...in & of itself. There began the Patriarchy, woman hating, child molesting, skin fearing, stark raving insane bloodthirsty Evil conniving despicable leches we have in charge of Our world today.
As a scientist and artist - it was clear they were very black African from the art and sculptural works. Then you had invasions and migrations. I find it silly that these clearly evidenced facts are overlooked from the late 1880 on. Now with the genetic evidence, clearly better pictures can be presented to the public about what the old kingdom to the new kingdom people looked like. Thanks for this video!
Then as a scientist you should also know about the Eurasian backflow migration which transformed the genetics and cultures of North and East Africa beginning 30.000 yrs ago and into the Neolithic. It's no more credible pretending this didn't occur than pretending there wasn't also a black African connection through the Nile.
Stop grasping for straws!!! That ancient Eurasian "backflow" of the R1b Haplogroup was NOT the same strain of R1b that eventually produced modern-day Euasians!!! It was an older iteration entirely. So that Black African R1b Haplogroup that King Tit belonged to was not racially mixed as you Eucentricists and Ar@bcentrist are desperately trying to portray. King Tut's lineage was simply a Black African lineage of the R1b Haplogroup. Period. @@phil5365
@@phil5365Indeed. But genes don't equate to phenotypes and the ancient Europeans were black. The back migration from Europe was certainly from a black population because white skin evolved 8000 years ago.
@@williamfowler616 "A lot of people already knew they were black". He can say this but it's only people like him who think this And also, scientists did a study on a mummy from around 3ooo bc and it's genome showed that Egyptians actually had 7% European DNA with less Sub-Suharran DNA being very little.
The reason they don't want to admit that the ancient Egyptians were black is because they would then have to admit the children of Israel were black. How else could they blend in so well?
Why do you religious Zealots do this? The bible is mythology! The ancient Egyptians/Nile valley civilization, they existed on this planet. You don't need to believe in a man made book or have faith that they existed on this planet. They left so much physical evidence like artifacts, temples, tombs and bodies of people with names who actually existed on the planet. You don't have to take my words by faith but go see for yourself!
Not at all, because they; like everyone else who does actual history know that the Israelites never existed, as a matter of fact, admitting Ancient Egypt was Afrika (Black) would kill their bible non-sense altogether because they stole the Religion for Ancient Egypt, and people would put two and two together and the lies about all those people in their book would go up in smoke.
Thank You once again! I'm so happy and proud that your channel and others have become a collection of videos that should have been books on our library shelves long ago! Had people known the truth earlier, there might not have been so much depression and self-degradation among our people and many might have lived to reach for higher heights in life to bring great gifts to the world. Young folks, don't ever let anybody hold you back when you're reaching for a better world! You are descendants of the greatest!
Information was there many of us rejected it or would not pick up and read. Many of our people to this day can only learn from video but I bare witness our scholars have been trying to tell us, I know I was among them and there names will never be in books or videos
@@ekfreeman1 We were lied to most of the time. Today we have the technology to dispute a lot of what we called history. We can only imagine how many have passed on without the credit they deserve, unfortunately. I wonder like, what inventions and so on could have been made if our people recieved proper credit and were inspired to continue to contribute to the world. The timeline of mankind's progress would have been so much different with out the imposter's lies and greed, but that's the price all of humanity has to pay. All be blessed and stay strong!
a lot of people like myself (71) never believed that Pharaohs depicted and all of the statues were anything but people of African origin; I would just shrug and laugh to myself how blind people choose to be
es in Sydney, AustraliaUpvoted by Menna El Gendy , lives in Egypt (2003-present)3y Related What do modern Egyptians think of black Americans and other groups appropriating their history and culture? I have a largely Egyptian family. They chuckle and move on. No Egyptians take this very seriously. They know Egypt never stopped existing nor were its people ever replaced or bred out. They are the decendents of the ancients. Nothing will change their connection to their homeland. They also dont really think of themselves as black or white, just Egyptian.
Related What are the reasons why people say Ancient Greeks were black? This is fringe idea among black nationalists or black supremacists. The problem started in the 19th century, and it revolves around the fact that Africa's history is mostly unknown to us. Sub-Saharan Africa never developed advanced civilizations like you saw in Egypt, Sumer, Greece, etc. Many people believed that more advanced = more civilized = better, and although this is an utterly stupid idea it is nonetheless an idea some people have. Slavery was often justified in earlier generations through the argument that black people were 'inherently' inferior. As evidence of this inherent inferiority, people pointed out that Africa had no advanced civilization. (Again, dumb, but I'm just relating what someone else said) This argument needed to be disproven. Some people fixated on the possibility that certain advanced civilizations (such as the Egyptians) were located in Africa and probably had black people among them. They decided to claim Egypt as being 'black' (based upon scant evidence) because it advanced the idea that blacks were not inferior and slavery was, therefore, wrong. These kinds of ideas continued to fester into the 20th century. They were promoted by organizations such as the Nation of Islam and repeated by black nationalists like Malcom X. The Nation of Islam was/is a radical black supremacist organization that promoted a pseudo-religious myth in which black people were the first and best people on Earth. Now, there is great evidence that humanity originated in Africa, but the Nation's version of this story is pretty out there. (Worth a Google, if you're bored) Throughout most of America's history, white oppressors denied the possibility of black history or black identity. Schoolchildren were not taught African history, and black Americans did not inherit any history or culture from their ancestors. Not because Africa lacks historical records (sadly true) but because whites did not want blacks to know they had a homeland. I recall reading an excerpt from Malcom X in which he relates his shock and amazement when he discovered that Africans belonged to their own continent and culture. It allowed him to understand his identity and his place in the world, because he was now rooted in a culture that was understandable. If he had stopped there, he would have been doing alright. But he went on to repeat the claim of black Egyptians, not because the claim was grounded in historical evidence but rather because it filled an emotional need inside him. And that's really the point of it all. Africans have little in the way of recorded history, so some people compensate by trying to appropriate the cultures of others. I've heard the same thing about ancient Carthage, and also about both sides of the Trojan War. I once heard someone claim that the Greek shield-spear combination described in antiquity was in fact referring to the Zulu's assegai and nguni. This is a completely asinine idea devoid of evidence, but people continue to repeat it because it gives them emotional satisfaction and validation to believe they are descended from notable people. I can understand that black Americans had their own identity stolen and suppressed, and that is tragic and unforgivable. However, this fact does not give them license to appropriate other people's history in order to compensate. 31K views View 169 upvotes View 6 shares 1 of 40 answers
I think half the problem of accepting black african heritage into the Egyptian ancestry came about because of arguments involving Cleopatra's Greek ancestry confusing the issue with unnecessary arguments. I'm glad that people have finally started resorting to DNA sampling to get definitive answers, instead of trying to rely on bloodlines from recorded history. DNA can say much more about a person's origins than might be carved in a rock for posterity's sake.
Thank you for continuing to affirm our indigenous contribution to this planet. The evidence, if read with unbiased lenses, unflinchingly speaks the truth of the Sons and Daughters of Africa steering the vessel of civilization! Respect in the highest form doing your part to overturn the misinformation and presenting evidence in a clear structured manner.
Then you'll be surprised to find that Ancient Kemet aka Egypt was highly influenced by Peoples of the Levant, Sumer, and from the West, Iberia, modern France and Spain. A Comprehensive study of DNA from the Ancient People and Kings/Pharaohs of Kemet/Egypt. The Bloodlines of the Monarchs and the Peoples. Like no other Region on the Globe currently known, Egypt and Northern Africa has an Abundance of Remains that offer specimens for Genetic Studies. It is Imperaitive to set forth the group descriptions, noting Kings/Pharohs that were of Public origins, ie: Generals that were handed the Kingship or usurped the Ruler to gain Kingship. Ramses is in this group. His family were not originally of the Royal Bloodlines, although they married within the group. Nubians were in Upper Egypt, the South and were predominantly Black African. The earlier Kings were influenced by the Bloodlines associated with peoples from the West and North of Egypt, the Ancient Mediterranean in constant movement, peoples that were Seafaring and land trekking towards the areas rich in resources, namely Food. Th8s fata has absolutely been collected and studied, but withheld from the Public because it doesn't fit the "Mainstream Model" Africa does not equate to must be Black, it is highly prevalent in % of Black, yet Indigenous White Groups exist, such as the N African Indigenous White Berbers, who are of Basque Origin. It is a time for Mature Minded Ethical Facts, and this is unfolding at present. B Bartlett Sociologist/Behavioralist and Historian .
Exactly! But I don’t understand why this channel keep twisting science about ancient Egypt?! Science and every single evidence shows that overwhelming majority of modern Egyptians are descendants of ancient Egyptians. But channels like this one keep misleading people into believing they ( ancient Egyptians) were subsaharan Africans. So pathetic!
Science says that the DNA of mummified Egyptians shows that the ancient Egyptians of 5,000 years ago were not much different than modern Egyptians of today, and that they had more commonalities with their neighbors in Mesopotamia than with sub-Saharan Africans.
Sorry, but actual DNA testing on mummified Egyptians shows that ancient Egyptians of 5,000 years ago were not that much different than modern Egyptians of today, and had more genealogical commonality with their Mesopotamian neighbors than with sub-Saharan Africans.
In my DNA test it reveals Black African HM King Pharaoh Ramsses II is my distant great granddad! One of the BEST videos I have ever seen speaking the truth. I am 50% African and 50% European and have always know this what you are saying is truth! Via DNA, haplogroup, phenotype, Egyptology, Ethnology. YOUR VIOES SHOW HAVE BILLIONS OF VIEW EACH!
When you want to see what Ancient Egyptian look like without the mass amounts of mixing from the Greeks, Arabs and then Turks or exodus, you just need to go look at the modern tribes in Somalia, Kenya, Ethiopia and Eritrea and Uganda. That is how the Ancient Egyptians looked prior to the invasions by the Persians, Greeks, Romans, Arabs and then Turks!
Excellent statement, just drop the word "tribe". It brings to mind simple people wearing grass skirts, living in buffalo skin teepees, in small social groups of 70 - 80 people with no cities, no significant industry/economy/ law/government, hunting and gathering with some small subsistence farming. This describes many tribes living in the Amazon until this day, and even accurately describes places like pre-Roman Germany where they lived in tiny communities of 70 families, had no established government structure, no major economy or industry with mainly subsistence living, and built no roads or cities of any kind. This does NOT describe African people - who had a sophisticated urban cultures along with rural cultures, cities full of comfortable well-constructed houses, city streets and roads, city walls and gates, standing militaries, sophisticated government/industry/societal/economic systems, beautiful well-made clothing and jewelry, beautiful horse cavalry, metallurgy, livestock, agriculture, etc. The actual "tribes" in Africa are very few, and are only found in the extremely rural parts of the continent such as the Kahalari Bushmen and the Twa people (pygmies.) The vast majority Africans either live in sophisticated urban cities, medium sized towns, or small villages, BUT THE EUROCENTRIC MEDIA TRIES TO SHOW US ONLY THE MOST REMOTE AND EXTREMELY RURAL AFRICANS TO REPRESENT ALL OF AFRICA, and the word "tribe" is used to describe African civilizations which is absolute bullsh*t. Use words like ethnic group, kingdom, empire, civilization, etc. to describe African societies, or you can use the generic term "people" as in the Hausa People, or Akan people, never use the word tribe ever again please, unless you're talking about "actual" African tribes like the Bushmen. Let's get ahead of the game👊
I actually worked in a museum when an ancient Egyptian sarcophagus was opened and the mummy’s DNA was tested.. I was also able to see “her” hair.. she was black.. like me.
Do you really think that people believe your hoax story?! Not a single mummy looks black African . NONE . Even Cushitic people were closer to west Eurasians than black Africans.
Well I don’t know what dna tests she’s referring to ! Why did she lied about “ working in Egyptian museums “ and “ dna tests showed she was black” ! We both know she’s lying. I guarantee you she didn’t even ever visit Egypt at all . Not a single Egyptian mummy looks like west and Central Africans .
Will a group of blacks come after hundreds of years to claim that America is the land of your ancestors just because groups of blacks lived there or were ruled by a black person like Obama?
I'll say it again, Herodotus said that during his decades living in Egypt, the Egyptians would often brag about being descended from the most ancient peoples on earth across the Atlantic. Thoth also told the Europeans he'd come from across the Atlantic.
Because the Europeans had a demonic intentions to stolen birth rights the European has removed us from his-story the sovereign America Indian ne-gro people.
Their Fear is why...like everything else..they fear people figuring it out...undoing their generations of carefully woven webs of lies. & some of them believe if they ignore it it will go away.
@@NuLiForm It’s not actually debatable. We all know ancient Kemet are the ancestors of overwhelmingly modern day Egyptians. This debate started when some raxe hoaxers in blk communities started to try to blackwash the history of ancient Egypt/Kemet.
I would like to preface this answer with the following development: UA-camrs such as Dane Calloway are Teaching African/black Americans that They are the real Indigenous people of the Americas, and that Native Americans are all “$5.00 Indians”. Though this Really Bothered me, as an Actual Indigenous person, I didn’t do anything about it. Freedom of speech being my main objective in leaving them alone, for the most part. I also view them as a sort of ‘flat earth’ type society. They don’t believe in the science of DNA because that would Prove they originate in Africa, just as DNA from our ancient graves have already proven that We are the descendents of the people who came here thousands upon thousands of years ago. Even tens of thousands of years ago. What has happened since then, is that the STUDENTS of Dane Calloway and others (Dane Calloway has over 35,000,000 views on his channels, and has become very well off as result of pushing this nonsense) have become violent and racist, threatening Native Americans that I know on Tik Tok and Instagram! My friends have had to contact police, as they consider the Death Threats to be very Serious! Black Americans that believe that they are the real Indigenous people and that Native Americans are ‘$5.00 Indians, feel Entitled to attack our people as they view US as the Aggressor! This is what they have been taught by Dane Calloway
At 22:05 the narrator names the king depicted as Hor Aha, the successor of Narmer (First Dynasty, c. 3000 BCE). The statue shown however, is the wooden ka sculpture of a far later ruler named Au-ib-Re Hor Thirteenth Dynasty, c. 1750 BCE.
The first settlers in northern Sudan 🇸🇩 date back 300,000 year's. It is home to the oldest Sub-Saharan African Kingdom, the Kingdom of Kush (about 2500-1500 B.C.E). This culture produced some of the most beautiful pottery in the Nile Valley, including Kerma beakers
I don't think that's true. The area was populated longer than that by people of that land and not a migration to the land. Inside of their museum in Sudan there is a miniature structure of an Ancient village one of the earliest ones that popped up throughout Africa. Those people were of that region and not migratory of that region .......I actually have a picture
Can we please stop using "Sub-Sahara". This is Eurocentric terminology that is meant to separate Africa, racially, economically and makes no geographic sense.
@@lauwilliams-hn8qs It's a term for climate zones not people zones.Meant to refer to areas along the edge of the Saharan Desert which people have constantly undulated in long as it retreats and advances.
Find a better source please. This video is false and intentionally misleading. You are being deceived by having your black supremacy tendancies exploited. It is targeting you to keep you separate from other humans.
The Bloodline referred to in this completely inaccurate video came about when ALL humans were black, 70,000 years ago. Don't believe a thing simply because you want to believe in it.
If the Ancient Egyptians were so call "Black" in skin complexion then the Hebrew Israelites also had to be black/brown in complexion because the Jewish people claiming Israel couldn't stomach the enormous heat in Egypt when Joseph was second in command under Pharoah in BC era.
Correct, the ISRAELITES were and are black! The Israeli government knows this, that's why they made a law against DNA tracing. No "Israeli" is allowed to have their DNA looked at.
Why is that the most important think to Egyptologists is to prove that ancient Egyptians weren't black. They muddy the water and cause confusion by telling Africans that black people are trying to take their culture. We never broke into pyramids and stole gold and artifacts.
The reason why they try to claim Egypt is because it's another attempt to hide the true identity of the people of The Book. A white Messiah couldn't hide in a black Egypt.
@@renaissancewoman100 It's proven that gold and artifacts were stolen ASAP by local bandits. Why do you piss off the maestria of the local robbers? Their IQ were high.
On my first trip to Ghana, I saw the evidence everywhere I went that they are the descendants of the ancient Egyptians. I could see that modern civilization came from them, and I was astounded by their craftsmanship everywhere I went. There is no doubt in my mind that civilization started in the continent of Africa.
@@cdub11532 What remains to study is, how did we lose all that kemetic knowledge. Because we were basically at a disadvantage during the slavery times.
She's right about the intro part because I'm an African American who did an African ancestry DNA test. It showed my ancestors are from a certain West African country that I won't name & our particular tribe has its roots in Ancient Egypt. It's pretty exciting. It makes me wonder if the same race who enslaved the Black Hebrews are the race who enslaved my Black ancestors in America.
OMG she just said the exact country & tribe my maternal side descended from according to DNA test.. I just got goosebumps. And the USA schools taught me my history started with American slavery. Hog wash.
first of all, before the America's, Africans were selling each other to the trans-Saharan slave trade for thousands of years, the trans-Atlantic slave trade came after and within a few hundred years, it was the Caucasians who made it unacceptable, Africans enslaved Africans. If you think some whitey was able to get off a boat and catch negores in their native lands...you got to be crazy. Ergo the race that enslaved you has been the african one, just as Europeans enslaved other euros and Asians enslaved other Asians... It all starts with our own insensitivity to our neighbour.
Yes, our ancestors 1st called them hyksos, then Roman's and Greek, now we call them European. They all used us as slaves because of our melanin genius. They claim everything we invented
My husband and my father both had E1B1a y-chromosome. We are African American. Autosomal show Bantu and Khoisan. The ancestors settled the Americas. I found a book that describes the “costumes” of indigenous in America East of the Mississippi. It is NOTHING like the images presented in the media. Head shaving, wearing a roach on top of head, braiding that were identical to one you just showed encircled the head. Body tattoos and piercings, and the disks in the lips and earlobes. Lots of beads. Amazing similarities. ☺️☺️
Idi.t Loooool Here is the result on G25 of the less distant people to an Egyptian of Old kingdom period : Distance to: Egypt_OldKingdom:I6409 Sample (Coordinates : 0.029665247,0.13868540,-0.047587444,-0.14426329,-0.0022221347,-0.063518622,-0.014261081,-0.013556098,0.087986490,0.0041161682,-0.0028172711,-0.019512651,0.055365686,0.0068209691,0.0071103512,0.014172621,-0.0011899901,-0.019799603,-0.021658496,0.032836460,-0.0024145371,-0.010472191,-0.0046426664,-0.0034683108,0.0029676763) : 0.06665294 Yemenite_Dhamar:Y382 0.07180916 Yemenite_Mahra:Y326 0.07237610 Egypt_Old_Middle_Kingdom:I10020 0.07347411 Yemenite_Amran:Y542 0.07355550 Yemenite_Dhamar:Y036 0.07409015 BedouinB:HGDP00624 0.07453930 Yemenite_Dhamar:Y038 0.07454369 BedouinB:HGDP00651 0.07494247 Yemenite_Mahra:Y345 0.07549846 Yemenite_Al_Jawf:Y221 No one is Black African. Dynastic Egypt wasn't black but very mixed: => Nakht-Ankh - Deir Rifeh cemetery, Middle Egypt (3829 ybp) : Haplogroup H-Z19080. => TT320-CCG61065 - Valley of the Kings (3360ybp) : Haplogroup J-L267. => KV62 - Valley of the Kings (3285 ybp) : Haplogroup R-M343. => KV46Y - Valley of the Kings (3360 ypb) : G-P15. => Unknown Man E - Deir el Bahari (Royal Egypt) : Haplogroup E-V38. Here are the G25 result of Nakht-Ankh (0.0012,0.129,-0.044,-0.0965,-0.0031,-0.0534,-0.017,-0.0078,0.0551,-0.0049,0.0138,-0.0172,0.0306,-0.0015,0.0069,-0.0072,-0.0111,0.0053,-0.004,0.0042,-0.0012,0.0046,-0.0078,0.0026,-0.0013) : Distance to: Egyptian_1879bc:Nakht-Ankh 0.03738170 Egyptian:Egypt1AQ172 0.03746435 Egyptian:Egypt15AQ172 0.03825737 Egyptian:Egypt5AQ172 0.04069069 Sarah_Coptic 0.04156682 Egyptian:Egypt7AQ172 0.04232390 Egyptian:Egypt17AQ176 0.04328952 Egyptian:2AJ137 0.04453109 Egyptian:Egypt12AQ172 0.04459642 Egyptian:4AJ136 0.04474741 Egyptian:12AJ129 You have restarted the Afrocentric propaganda machine. So called African-Americans don't think, they will tell you yes, Amen.
That’s cos America was always as diverse as Asia and Africa. Not just one race there were whites browns and blacks all in America just as there are today.
The first LIE they told is that ANCIENT Egypt is only 3000-5000 years old. The Ancient Egyptians Kings list is over 40,000 Years old. They had to decrease it so that they can add themselves in. 🙏🏿🤴🏾👸🏾🖤
That is proposed Egypt is not 40000.where did the ancient Egyptians wrote that? proof from records. That is impossible because many civilization ruins are under water in the ocean.
i think that u have a strong point here that i had not given thought to--it appears that they had to shorten the time frame so they could allow themselves in--because the white race was the last race we brought here about 7700 years ago if the Chinese civilization was about 5000 years ago, how come the Egyptian civilization is about 3 to 5000 years? you can see the inconsistencies in those inaccurate assessments made by white people who have had a long history of distorting history and they have not given up--only that now they are up against a more serious challenge with their lies that will soon die out
@@lactusgalacto1174Look it up, the Greeks called the Egyptians ANCIENT because when the arrived everything was already standing & ANCIENT. To date Europeans are still STUDYING AFRICA. 😜
This video is massive and mind-blowing. Black people are the foundation of the world. History, Science and Archaeology have told us all how great, cultural and fundamental black people were. All the research is factual. Only people who refuse to look deeper and embrace reality will argue based on errors being told and taught based on political and social constructs. Great research Bravo brother 🩷👌
I recently traced my E haplogroup all the way back to the Y haplogroup of Kush and upper Egypt and finally to Nigeria. This video is basically mapping my ancestors DNA migration.
@@amanokal5635 I all not a scientist, so take this information for what it is. But here is a video of me tracing my E haplogroup back to where it started is a Y haplogroup. ua-cam.com/video/RAdg1s53E7Q/v-deo.htmlsi=tcxY3sTO5SdeqsNl
@@cardesignerchris you need to review your haplotype E u174 ( seen in your video) is a Subclade of EM2: haplotype E U174 reflects Bantu expansion . Haplotype E u174 top two population is US and Nigeria . Also Haplotype Note: I am not scientist. I didn’t see your test with your video previously , until now. I will delete my post out of respect for you . Weall begin in”East Africa.
I just cant thank you enough for your dedication to this topic. Its completely necessary especially im this day and age when these Egyptologist want to white wash, hide and destroy our ancestors and there contributions to the civilization of the world.
Related What are the reasons why people say Ancient Greeks were black? This is fringe idea among black nationalists or black supremacists. The problem started in the 19th century, and it revolves around the fact that Africa's history is mostly unknown to us. Sub-Saharan Africa never developed advanced civilizations like you saw in Egypt, Sumer, Greece, etc. Many people believed that more advanced = more civilized = better, and although this is an utterly stupid idea it is nonetheless an idea some people have. Slavery was often justified in earlier generations through the argument that black people were 'inherently' inferior. As evidence of this inherent inferiority, people pointed out that Africa had no advanced civilization. (Again, dumb, but I'm just relating what someone else said) This argument needed to be disproven. Some people fixated on the possibility that certain advanced civilizations (such as the Egyptians) were located in Africa and probably had black people among them. They decided to claim Egypt as being 'black' (based upon scant evidence) because it advanced the idea that blacks were not inferior and slavery was, therefore, wrong. These kinds of ideas continued to fester into the 20th century. They were promoted by organizations such as the Nation of Islam and repeated by black nationalists like Malcom X. The Nation of Islam was/is a radical black supremacist organization that promoted a pseudo-religious myth in which black people were the first and best people on Earth. Now, there is great evidence that humanity originated in Africa, but the Nation's version of this story is pretty out there. (Worth a Google, if you're bored) Throughout most of America's history, white oppressors denied the possibility of black history or black identity. Schoolchildren were not taught African history, and black Americans did not inherit any history or culture from their ancestors. Not because Africa lacks historical records (sadly true) but because whites did not want blacks to know they had a homeland. I recall reading an excerpt from Malcom X in which he relates his shock and amazement when he discovered that Africans belonged to their own continent and culture. It allowed him to understand his identity and his place in the world, because he was now rooted in a culture that was understandable. If he had stopped there, he would have been doing alright. But he went on to repeat the claim of black Egyptians, not because the claim was grounded in historical evidence but rather because it filled an emotional need inside him. And that's really the point of it all. Africans have little in the way of recorded history, so some people compensate by trying to appropriate the cultures of others. I've heard the same thing about ancient Carthage, and also about both sides of the Trojan War. I once heard someone claim that the Greek shield-spear combination described in antiquity was in fact referring to the Zulu's assegai and nguni. This is a completely asinine idea devoid of evidence, but people continue to repeat it because it gives them emotional satisfaction and validation to believe they are descended from notable people. I can understand that black Americans had their own identity stolen and suppressed, and that is tragic and unforgivable. However, this fact does not give them license to appropriate other people's history in order to compensate. 31K views View 169 upvotes View 6 shares 1 of 40 answers
@@qnqmria you realize the genione for bright skin mutantion kicked in roughly around 15 thousand years ago right 😂 but I do enjoy the pure ignorance in ur trolling my advice ..do alittle more study and also diversafy ur choice of materials..u might enlighten who knows
@@qnqmriaif you think ‘sub Saharan’ Africa didn’t have advanced civilization, that’s you. We know they did! We also know the diversity of Africas people. But we also know what is authentically African! And even before allll this evidence that is being beat against your head😂😂😂…we knew this. It’s not emotional, it’s almost spiritual, it’s a connection everyone else wants, but no matter how much they claim it, they don’t have. And what’s hilarious is we see there is no connection with any other people accept the African people. Could there have been some influence here and there from other cultures, probably so, since they traded with other cultures, and other cultures came to live down in the Nile valley and take on this African culture. But the very essence of this culture is nothing but African!! So I think it is people like you crying on UA-cam, despite alllllll the evidence, that are the emotional ones. This is apparently a hard pill for you and people in denial like yourself to swallow because you have this idea of what Africa is or isn’t, but just swallow it!! 😅😅 As you can see we don’t care about your emotions, we are going with facts to prove to the truth agin and again✌🏾✌🏾
@@sillywonka8219 The same way someone becomes white. Genetic adaptation to one's environment or to a different environment from where one was born, but over about 200 years of generations. Those that migrated to and around the equator became darker and those who migrated away from the equator towards the poles became lighter.
@@spadesmaster2153 I'm going to assume you're not a copper colored individual... It's crazy because the greatness of the people I resemble always has to be a discussion.
Thank you my brother, I just don’t admire what you and your team is doing. I love what without history is doing, and is freeing our people from the negativity our people have endured. Thank so much and many blessing to all that’s accomplishing this task.
@@withoutHistory The DNA Tribes study, which used an 8-STR marker analysis to conclude that the royal Egyptian mummies (like those of King Tutankhamun and others) were of Sub-Saharan African ancestry, has been met with substantial skepticism and criticism. There are several key points to consider when evaluating the validity of this study: Background of the DNA Tribes Study DNA Tribes is a private company that offered commercial genetic ancestry analysis using a set of 21 autosomal STR markers. In 2012, DNA Tribes analyzed data from the published results of a 2010 study by Zahi Hawass and his team, which involved the royal mummies, including Tutankhamun and Amenhotep III. The original 2010 study by Hawass et al. had focused on identifying familial relationships among the mummies using a small set of STR markers. DNA Tribes took the allelic data from that study (8 STR markers, not the complete set used by the company) and compared them to their internal database of modern population STR profiles. They then published an analysis suggesting a closer genetic affinity between the mummies and modern Sub-Saharan African populations based on these STR profiles. Major Concerns and Limitations of the DNA Tribes Study Small Number of STR Markers (8 STRs): The analysis was based on only 8 STR markers, which is insufficient for making reliable or detailed conclusions about ancestry or population affinity. As discussed earlier, using just 8 STR markers is problematic due to the limited resolution and potential overlap in allele frequencies across different populations. In the context of ancestry analysis, having so few STR markers can lead to broad and potentially misleading results because it does not capture enough genetic information to differentiate between closely related populations accurately. Allele Frequency Overlap: STRs can exhibit high variability between individuals, but not necessarily in a way that uniquely distinguishes populations. Allele frequency overlaps between groups (especially between geographically proximate populations in North Africa, East Africa, and Sub-Saharan Africa) can make definitive conclusions difficult with such a small set of markers. The database used by DNA Tribes might not have fully accounted for these overlaps, which can lead to conclusions that are skewed or not statistically robust. Interpretation and Statistical Analysis: DNA Tribes compared the allele frequencies of the 8 STR markers to their proprietary database of modern population groups. This database, however, may not have been comprehensive or consistent with other datasets used by the scientific community. In any ancestry analysis, the choice and size of the reference database play a crucial role in the conclusions. Additionally, the methodologies for comparing these allelic frequencies and arriving at conclusions were not well-documented or peer-reviewed in scientific literature, making it hard to evaluate the validity of their claims independently. Context of the Original Data: The 2010 study by Hawass et al. did not aim to study population affinity but rather focused on identifying familial relationships between mummies. The 8 STR markers used in the original study were chosen for forensic and kinship purposes, not for broader population genetics or ancestry conclusions. Using allelic data collected for one purpose (familial relationships) and repurposing it for another (population affinity) can introduce biases or misinterpretations. Lack of Peer Review and Scientific Consensus: The DNA Tribes study was not published in a peer-reviewed scientific journal, which is a significant limitation in terms of scientific credibility. The absence of peer review makes it difficult to assess the study's methods, statistical analyses, and conclusions against established standards in population genetics. The broader scientific community has not accepted the conclusions drawn by DNA Tribes, and reputable scholars in Egyptology and population genetics have questioned the methodology and findings. Ancient DNA Degradation and Contamination Concerns: Ancient DNA studies require careful extraction and analysis methods due to the degraded and often contaminated nature of ancient DNA samples. The reliability of ancient DNA data depends heavily on the quality and authenticity of the DNA extracted. While the 2010 study by Hawass et al. claimed to have extracted authentic DNA from the mummies, ancient DNA research requires highly rigorous protocols to minimize contamination risks. Without direct validation and more comprehensive genetic data, conclusions drawn from such ancient samples remain tentative. Summary: Is the DNA Tribes Study Valid? The DNA Tribes study, which used 8 STR markers to conclude that the royal Egyptian mummies were of Sub-Saharan African affinity, is not considered a scientifically valid or robust study by most population geneticists and Egyptologists. Here’s why: Insufficient Genetic Data: Analyzing only 8 STR markers is not enough to make precise or definitive claims about population ancestry, especially in the context of complex population histories like that of ancient Egypt. Methodological Issues: The methods used by DNA Tribes were not adequately detailed or subjected to peer review. The reliance on a proprietary and potentially incomplete database adds to the concerns. Scientific Consensus: The broader academic community does not support the findings of the DNA Tribes study. Peer-reviewed genetic studies on ancient Egyptian remains often involve larger numbers of markers or SNPs, with more nuanced conclusions about population affinity. While the results of the DNA Tribes analysis are an interesting hypothesis, they do not stand up to scientific scrutiny due to the limited dataset and methodological issues. Thus, its conclusions should be viewed with caution and not taken as definitive evidence of the royal mummies’ ancestry. More comprehensive studies using ancient DNA from multiple mummies and employing genome-wide analysis techniques would be needed to draw reliable conclusions about the ancestry of ancient Egyptians.
I think earlier egyptians were darker but it would be a stretch to call ptolemaic-era egyptians black because almost all egyptians today have an olive dark skin tone
Who are the people with black so dark it is almost blue? Are they from Nubia? I knew at least three people whose skin was that beautiful dark dark color!!
@@Coldyrapsit’s anology meaning modern Egyptians like Mercian’s and Algerians in North Africa are descendants from the ottoman Muslim empire who invaded those regions in the 7th bc!
Without a doubt this video is one of the very best I've ever seen and I will be paying every close attention to your channel from this point on .. I would just like to thank you for a very informative and educational program I have seen out of all of the others I have watched
Martin Burnal's Black Athena :The Afroasiatic Roots of Classical Civilization first published in 1987, is a book that first proposed this theory. He was shunned by academia. it's refreshing to see that the world is finaly waking up to the truth. Thank you for covering this topic.
No he popularised it in European academic circles. Cheik Anta Diop had already presented his theories to the Sorbonne in the 1960's . Including the disputed origin of homosapien sapien.
Thank you @@gussom, for the reference. I look forward to another good book. Perhaps a more accurate statement is, Martin Bernal's book was my first introduction to this theory.
They can never let the Truth be known that Ancient Khimet was "Black" and that most Ancient Pharaohs were too indeed"Black" If they were to ever admit that Ancient Khimet was "Black" would mean admitting that the Israelites were/are also "Black" This an extremely dangerous Truth that they must and have to keep hidden at all costs.
@@iprofox3758 the hybrids came from caves their only legacy is conquering legacy of bloodshed k7lling stealing und destroying natives nature and good World wide
As a proud Irish academic Egypt was a Black African civilization anything else is just hypocrisy and jealousy. No other people if not the Africans still have cultural link legitimacy with ancient Egypt. Indeed, among many tribes, the twenty-fifth Dynasty of Pharaohs carry hausa tribe names still bore by many (Tantamani,Taharqa,Shabaka,Anlamani ...).Way before the Greek one, the city (i.e waset) that would latter become Luxor, Thebes (greek pronounciation) in Egypt was a highly armed city therefore its name (Tēgwais) which was translated "the fortified, sure" and still today Hausa in Eritrea, Sudan,Nigeria... use "Thabas" to say the same as Egyptians had +3000 years ago...Just scratching the damn surface but if we are to be sincere beyond biased interpretations we know exactly where the "crazy sounding" altered Egyptians words and names could lead us (Nebka, Medjedu, Menkaure, Khafre, Bakare, Menkhau, Djedkhau,Sahure, Saqqara). Only in hausa language is the sun still called as it was manly in ancient Egypt, Rā, (rānā, my Rā) , they call soul Re. Their royal title is still sarki or saraki while that of Egyptians was serekh (before the meaningless Pharaoh).With perfect matches Tutankhamu, karu(dogs) Ksar-baka ksar-fara, Rammessu,... can be defined by hausas who have never heard of Egypt. Moreover, Hausa syntaxes and even vocabulary are the closest to Coptic among the afro Asiatic languages and genetically the mysterious Hausas high percentage of r1b haplogroup is telling. Beliefs had preceded history. Lastly, this is not to attribute a history to one people bus merely stating what makes sense if not Egypt will remain an eternal mystery some wish for sadly. Ancient Egypt is an achievement by Africans of all colors.
@@kennethcobb7914 you sound stupid with the evidence that is available, you sound racist because the blacks have built nothing that can be tied back to them?
@@williamfowler616some? How many, 1 or 2 LOL and that can be explained easily as Africans in that region have those hair colours LOL wh!t3s are 2 to 4000 years old, they have no genetic connection to ancient civilisations
Another incredible video. Seeing how our ancestors codified the hairstyles was sooooooo incredible. Thank you for work you are doing and the light you are shedding. Don’t remember the last time I enthusiastically liked, shared, and subscribed!
@@EnergyShifting Unfortunately, you’ve been lied to. DNA test done by DNA tribes proved the ancient Egyptians were black. Geneticist have also done Hair studies & skin tone studies which also proved they were black. Keep coping, because DNA contradicts your lies.🫵🤣🤣🤣
This video is well done! The video went into full detail discussing Kemets true inhabitants of that ancient civilization. People of African descent must take note of this and take on the responsibility to teach this to our children in order to liberate them from their oppressor. We must use knowledge to continue further study and development. We must unify in order to reclaim our ancestral homelands. Kemet must be reclaimed from the invaders who currently occupy it. It is our duty to do so.
Today's Egyptians are the mixed race descendants of ancient Egyptians who were dark. They belong there. For any foolish non Egyptians of any color who thinks they have to "liberate" today's Egyptians are risking the wrath of the ancestors. The Ancestors live ALL their descendants no matter what they look like and wish those today would get their head out of their azzez and accept each other for their heart and not their skin. I'm a mixed race person who has seers in our family. Go ahead and risk their wrath. Don't come crying when they reject you and open a can of whoop ass on your ass. Peace.
Dr Yosef A.A. ben Jochannan, Dr. Ivan Van Sertima, Dr. John Henrik Clarke, and Dr chancellor Williams thank you for teaching us this information before leaving us.
I have been debating & arguing for months now with my half black Egyptian homie & his Arabic friend about whether this was true and I was called dumb and slow and laughed at. They even sent me the video of the Egyptian girl but Here it was your video that ended the whole thing. And proved what I've been saying for months now. THANK YOU
Why would those Europeans who first found the statues destroy their noses? While there is no proof, denying that they did not want the connection to the Egyptians being black to be so evident and had some element of envy and jealousy in their hearts would be disingenuous. The sheer number of statues without noses underlines this. You gained a sub today!
Most ancient Egyptians had straight noses like most northeast African anyway. They were still darker skinned African just not related to sub Saharan African except probably the horn of africa
Sure, Africans come with all features as it is the heart of civilization. For example, there are black people in Nigeria with blue eyes and black people living on some of the pacific islands with blond hair. My point is that there are certain features that are easily identified as African as white people don''t have those same features (ex. noses, full lips). Some Asians do but very few Whites/Europeans if any and that is a fact.@@exalteduchiha1563
I don't think Europeans destroyed the noses. There supposedly was a belief among Egyptians that evil entities could come to life through statues, but if the statues was partially damaged, the entities could not manifest.
@wdd3141…really that’s what you’re going with. Of course you wouldn’ t think they did it and it’s that blind thinking which allowed white washing our past to persist
I have a degree in chemistry (a physical science). I have always looked skeptically at the conclusions drawn by those in fields of social science, because there seems to be a tendency to cherry pick data. I had discussions about this with my cousin, who has a PhD from Harvard in economics. When my cousin was employed at a Beltway Bandit firm in the D.C. area he said they concluded that aircraft carriers were obsolete weapons systems. I was an active duty Navy officer at the time, and I had a different take on this.
That means anything! Iran and China are both in Asia and yet they have no connection with each other. North Africa was ALWAYS part of Mediterranean world. Geography does not equals race nor culture!
I really enjoyed this video 👏🏾. It’s funny, I just got my 23andMe DNA results and found that I share a paternal lineage with Ramesses III! They can’t tell me nothin’ now! 😂
Not to burst your bubble but that dna test just means your the same haplo group. There are a few dozen haplo groups. Its more likely that your super distant cousins. Still neat but worth clarifying
not really. plenty of black people arent in that haplo group. and since had lighter skin and red hair, he was moe likely related to west asian than black@@Omaroy33
Profile photo for Ygor Coelho Ygor Coelho · Follow Brazilian fascinated by world history, cultures & genetics.1y Related What do you think of people’s claims that the true “Native Americans” were black Moors? Well, it’s obviously a ridiculous pet theory of people who wish to aggrandize and glamourize their ancestors and their ethno-geographic origins, even if it that is done to the detriment of marginalized, discriminated against, undervalued and often oppressed people, such as the Native Americans, a part of humankind that was surely far more dispossesed and genocided in the last 500 years than their own suffering peoples. Moorish identity didn’t even exist at all, not even as a mere word, by the time the Amerindians we all know were already living all over the Americas, well before 10,000 years ago. There isn’t even one single instance of a population crossing an entire ocean many thousands of kilometers wide to settle in another continent, before about 5,000-6,000 years ago (and the first of those who did it, the Austronesians, actually navigated wide stretches of open sea from island to island, not reaching the Americas - certainly not in large enough numbers to colonize it or even to leave any indelible mark of their presence).
I love your work and the music. I hope to join your channel shortly. I also like the other bloggers you mentioned earlier in your video. THANK YOU, for your hard work.
Remember Joseph was a black Hebrew Israelite (what we call the black race today) and when his brothers showed up to Egypt they couldn't tell him apart from the Egyptians. Also when Pharaoh's daughter found Moses (a Hebrew boy ) she took him in as her own . She was Egyptian and he blended in with them.
Thank you brother, thank from the bottom of my heart unlike most people I was fortunate to be with many unknown scholars when pointed me in the right direction and no dna info. Beside what brother Diop had done. I hope our people awaken before it is my time to leave this physical plane
I have been saying for years that Dr Hamas could not be trusted. I have watched many docu's with him in there and that was always the vibe I got from him.
"I have been saying" is very good evidence indeed, proportionate to the weight of this entire nonsensical argument, namely 0. And it's "Hawas" not "Hamas", you sure you were looking at the right thing?
@@MohamedAbdelnasser-x5i There is plenty of evidence that he is biased in his opinions about certain topics. He is an old man and old school, so it is understandable. He has done some amazing work in his life time. However, It is time for some fresh eyes to look over all of the evidence and weigh in. My misspelling of his last name is because I am an English speaker and hear Arabic pronunciations differently. My brief comment was in no way an invitation to your arrogant and condescending response. Have a nice day.
@@Whisperwomaneq2 No amount of bias compares to the magnitude of wishful thinking that seeks to fabricate an entire new history appropriated from a distant land, it's fantastical.
@@Whisperwomaneq2 Nobody has the right to weigh in on our History and country with the explicit goal of appropriating it, and most certainly no such invitation has been issued to anybody who publishes such nonsense & no expertise or fresh eyes have been requested regarding this matter. Entirely fantastical.
If you found this informative please share. And for all those who are here to complain, please review the research first. Thanks. 🙏🏽 ❤
It hurts when this truth is found (for some)... admitting they inherited lies, just as the scriptures prophesied.
👏🏿👏🏿👏🏿👏🏿💯💯💯
Very thorough and informative. Great job!!
Excellent job brother! I was wondering when someone was going to address the Schuenemann study and its bogus conclusion. I hope you do decide to look into why this "study "always pops up when someone Googles the ethnicity of the ancient Egyptians, especially when you consider the fact that that's not even what the study was designed to do. I'm pretty sure you'd find some shady sh-t going on.
Once again, great job and I can't wait to read what kind of foolishness "those folks"have to say as a response to this video. They never cease to amuse and amaze me
: Cave dwellers claiming our great ancestry is ludicrous
all the ancient greek philosphers wrote who the ancients of africa were. they werent pale arabs and turkish colonizers. lol why do the modern egyptians ignore the walls,artifacts, and, bust & carvings?
Same reason the US ignores black folk.
Plato called the Egyptians 'Asiatics', and Herodotus placed Egypt in Asia, not Africa.
Yes, and Egypt is in Africa, everyone is crazy.
@@ario2264 And yet Egypt is in Africa not in the Asian continent where Europe is located (Cauca-Asians and Mongols).😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁
@@lactusgalacto1174
Where in Africa?😂
From the quantity of research that you do ,to the amount of time you dedicate to your craft and the level of quality of your work is very much appreciated it.
By quality of work do you perhaps mean easily debunkable nonsense?
@The_Reality_Filter yes. The easily debunkable nonsensical narrative that so-called historians have put forth as real history, That can be easily debunked by doing a deep research, just like this channel has done and given us a real cohesive historical narrative.
@@The_Reality_Filter
Well, the Host invited so let’s hear Your “easy debunking”.
Okay let's hear your facts, show us your research. Or are you just a troll? You have the floor! @@The_Reality_Filter
@@pzmoore007I don't have any research I leave that to the experts which in this case are called Egyptologists, experts in Ancient Egypt.
I am a 78 y.o. white American US male. I never gave much thought about it, I just assumed that the majority of Africans were black skinned which became lighter around the Mediterranean coast...including Egyptians. The history of the races (for lack of a better term) is fascinating. However, with man's propensity to alter history to suit his own needs or ideology it is difficult to sort truth from fiction. This video was most informative and left me wanting to follow and learn more.
Watch afrocentricsm critiqued video on african dna and the one on african migration
Their is nothing wrong with wanting to keep learning
Australian was originally black but today 2023 it’s majorly white just 300 years after the arrival of the colonist
@@shafsteryellowyou nor that eurocentrist can explain this videos evidence: ua-cam.com/video/teifWMAe2Qg/v-deo.htmlsi=3j_9ZrZzV5RXrE4p
@@kenny7872THAT PART THERE
What shocks me is the fact that Egypt is literally in Africa. Why is it shocking that ancient Egyptians were African? Like the rest of Africa, Egypt was invaded by Arabs and Europeans.
Because to lie about being connected to Egypt gives them free access to explore the pyramids and everything for power.
@@TeeEm24 only racist people think like that. Yes we egyptians are african but we don't look like sub saheran. Funny how africa is the second biggest continent but u think we all look sub saheran. Europens don't look a like.again stop being racist and be proud of ur real roots and stop trying to steal my culture
Also Israel is on the African tectonic plate.
This is only a reasonable conclusion IF you are under the belief that ALL of Africa was black. News flash.. there are MANY ethnic groups on Africa.
If you are under the belief that North African only became brown after Middle Eastern and European migration into North African then your wrong.. actually we KNOW that the Egyptians WERE NOT black and then slowly got lighter BECAUSE there was a test done that studied the genome of an Egyptian mummy from the 2,000BC period and not only did they find EVEN LESS Sub-Suharran (black) DNA in his genome compared to the amount found in modern Egyptians BUT ACTUALLY also found MORE European (Caucasoid) DNA (7%) in this mummy.
Also, I said "they found even LESS" Sub-Suharran, or Black, DNA then found in Egyptians TODAY.. So not only does this contradict the "Egyptians turned from black to brown/white" narrative.. but research have already pinpointed the period of the rise in Sub-Suharran DNA (black) within modern Egyptians as starting during the Saharan slave trade around 1,000bc and also around the time of Muslim expansion. Btw.. by "Muslim expansion" I mean the spread of Islam and NOT the spread and migration of Arabs.
I think It's "shocking" because the level of technology of ancient Egypt (as well as ancient Nubia and Ethiopia) does not seem to be reflected in the rest of Africa
During my first trip to Egypt in 2019, a dark skinned Nubian man, whispered in my ear and said, "Are you African American? I said, yes. He said, Welcome Home." They know who we are!
Yess
We're God's people. We originated in Egypt.
Yes they know? The book states you were on the top and pushed to the bottom but you will once more be on the top. Those on the top hate you and refuse for you to rise again., but you will!! Halle!
Did you cry? Did you choke up? Did you feel it? I did when I read your comment. It is amazing how important it is to have a tribe's man to have a homeland. A home..... They knew who they stole.
💚💚💚💚💚
It’s amazing that Egyptians still can’t see their African roots until genetic studies are developed… the hatred for dark skin is crazy 🙄
Absolutely
The modern Egyptian's ancestors are not indigenous to Africa.
Modern day egyptians are not african their arabs and turkish gypsies. But the ancient egyptians were black africans.
👏👏👏👍👍
@@ryonworthy7990 They're also a mixture of ancient Eurasians that infiltrated black lands in middle-east, south asia and north africa etc.
Professor Anton Diop provided the evidence to UNESCO.They want to reap where they did not sow. Great job.❤
Yupppp
UNESCO as we should recall were initially very resistant to the notion of Black Kemet. It took the genius work and DNA sample of mummies taken by the mindblowingly supergenius intellect of our Dr. Cheikh Ante Diop to push them toward the Black Alkebulan truth.
And. Dr. Diop uncovered the term "Alkebulan" which is one of the true ancient names for the continent miscalled "Africa".
You summed it up beautifully!
Cheik Anta Diop and Theophile Obenga? SALUTE
It is not Anton, It is Anta!
This is something we already knew..I love my Black African History. What is good about this video is, others are recognizing that too. 👍
Genetics don’t lie and neither do the paintings and artifacts themselves. Thank you for the due diligence and Justice to true human history. Herodotus and Greeks who studied in Ancient Egypt never hid this truth. Wishing you continued success and wealth!
and all these years your still trying to convince you are egyptian.. lol.. when you gonna start believing it??
So what about the paintings and artefacts and mummies that have absolutely Caucasian features and are depicted with blue eyes?
@@scaberouswretch3673 that’s only because white people were there too mostly as visitors and invaders. There were Asian mummies found also.Y’all really believe ancient Egyptians were white? Even the ancient Greeks who were actually there documented that they were black with wooly hair. Why is that so hard for y’all to believe?
People have been occupying and invading those lands for thousands of years. At some point, especially during the Hellenistic period, there were lighter skinned people living in Egypt as well. Its not hard to think that a culture that spans almost 6k plus years wouldn't have attracted people from all over the known world at that time. @@scaberouswretch3673
Most of those alleged Ancient Egyptian artifacts with "Caucasian features" are modern-day FAKES‼@@scaberouswretch3673
As a Yoruba, we still have it in our history told by my elders that did not attend western educational classes that we are from that region!
U a fake yoruba they never say that
Yes of course and the black mummies they find.. they are bewildered and try to rewrite out history over and over again
CN you detail what they say ?
through genetics we found out that my wife's lineage is traced back to the Yoruba people.
@jablum77 There were waves of migration from middle east at a time when islamists waged war on the idol worshipping. What is lost in the Muslim text is that it was a racial war that drove all blacks from the middle east. They were referred to as kaffirs...
The last drove to arrive in current Yoruba land are the Ijebus. Some settled in Sudan region also. At the same time, Egypt was pushing out their blacks which were majorly in the immediate south of the Sahara like the Hausa, Fula or Fulani, etc. Some came to settle in Yoruba land also... my ppl.
Research Lamurudu and Oduduwa, you will find more materials
Exactly no European nation or country ever had any styles like thst of Ancient Egypt/Kemet. But you see these same styles in other African tribes
Perfectly stated, I tend to use too many words for people to listen lol.
Great point
Yep, Egyptian culture was AFRICAN not European, not Arab, not Asian ..
For Real
To just even think of it wp wouldn’t even look right with their hair like that… to be honest they would look stupid 😂
Egypt was originally called the land of Ham. Ham was the father of several sons, one who was named Mizraim. Mizriam today is known as Egypt.
Well, in Kiswahili, we call Egypt Misri
@@kariukikiragu Probably because you have absolutely no idea of who Mizraim is or was.
But Mizraim (Originaly Egypt) is Now known as Missouri USA in present day! Which was the area Hams progeny went to Build like Moundbuild'n Masons & Farm like Agricultural Chemists - in This place also known as Kemet/Khamet ("Land of the Blacks," or Terra Pretor/Black Earth)...
@@ryanbrowm5424Egypt is NOT in America. And Kemet means land of BLACK SOIL, not BLACK PEOPLE
@@exalteduchiha1563Book source: "When Rocks Cry Out", the author (horace butler) proved it IS in america. He was offered 6 figures by National Geographic to purchase his book & findings which he turned down. They, of course, ran his name through the mud as a result. Watch his interviews talking about it. Much of this is Old news btw.
I was in a rug store some time ago and a guy working in there, who looked so called “Middle Eastern” or from somewhere in that area, asked me out of the blue, “are you Egyptian?” I said no, why? He replied, “because you look like how real Egyptians look.” I never forgot that and wish I would have further questioned him.
That happened to my sister while there
That was a beautiful experience and I only hope more people will be this honest.
We were in Egypt last month on a cruise. My husband was asked whether he is an Egyptian, some even started talking to him in Arabic without hesitation thinking that he is local Egyptian!!! We are from India (Indian Americans!). We love Egyptians!! 🥰🥰
Most likely because in Southern Egypt there are still black Egyptians. The northern region of Egypt was invaded numerous times. The Egyptians in southern Egypt resemble the ancestors the most because invaders didn’t invade that deep into Egypt. If you ever see the people of southern Egypt you’ll notice they are eerie similar in person to African Americans and other African cultures.
@@KapitalRolliereally??! Cool!
One thing we know for sure is us East Afrikans created Ancient Nubia and Ancient Egypt and Kush. We still speak the language, even today, we refer to our leaders as 'Kufu', 'Mtu-Kufu'. The god of water that the Ancient Egyptians call Ha-pi has a word we still use today for water here in Kenya and Uganda, pi. We also have the long horned cattle of the Pharaohs. Dr. Ben Jochnnan said Nubia is the mother of Ancient Egypt but Kenya and Uganda are the grandmother of Ancient Egypt.
😂 Bantu invaders
@@shafsteryellow Somalis, Ethiopians, who follow Christianity, Judaism and Islam are the invaders, these are not Afrikan ancient religion but Arab, Jewish and Greek religions. Bantus have been in Ancient Egypt for 60,000 years, how can Afrikans invade Afrika? You Somalis, Ethiopians are not Afrikan but Arab and Jewish mulattos, just look at your hair. Islam is not Afrikan
@@shafsteryellowMIGRATING "!?BANTUS!?"@ "O"RIGINAL NORTH AFRICANS!!! PER EVIDENCE!!!
Here is the result on G25 of the less distant people to an Egyptian of Old kingdom period :
Distance to: Egypt_OldKingdom:I6409 Sample (Coordinates : 0.029665247,0.13868540,-0.047587444,-0.14426329,-0.0022221347,-0.063518622,-0.014261081,-0.013556098,0.087986490,0.0041161682,-0.0028172711,-0.019512651,0.055365686,0.0068209691,0.0071103512,0.014172621,-0.0011899901,-0.019799603,-0.021658496,0.032836460,-0.0024145371,-0.010472191,-0.0046426664,-0.0034683108,0.0029676763) :
0.06665294 Yemenite_Dhamar:Y382
0.07180916 Yemenite_Mahra:Y326
0.07237610 Egypt_Old_Middle_Kingdom:I10020
0.07347411 Yemenite_Amran:Y542
0.07355550 Yemenite_Dhamar:Y036
0.07409015 BedouinB:HGDP00624
0.07453930 Yemenite_Dhamar:Y038
0.07454369 BedouinB:HGDP00651
0.07494247 Yemenite_Mahra:Y345
0.07549846 Yemenite_Al_Jawf:Y221
No one is Black African.
Dynastic Egypt wasn't black but very mixed:
=> Nakht-Ankh - Deir Rifeh cemetery, Middle Egypt (3829 ybp) : Haplogroup H-Z19080.
=> TT320-CCG61065 - Valley of the Kings (3360ybp) : Haplogroup J-L267.
=> KV62 - Valley of the Kings (3285 ybp) : Haplogroup R-M343.
=> KV46Y - Valley of the Kings (3360 ypb) : G-P15.
=> Unknown Man E - Deir el Bahari (Royal Egypt) : Haplogroup E-V38.
Here are the G25 result of Nakht-Ankh (0.0012,0.129,-0.044,-0.0965,-0.0031,-0.0534,-0.017,-0.0078,0.0551,-0.0049,0.0138,-0.0172,0.0306,-0.0015,0.0069,-0.0072,-0.0111,0.0053,-0.004,0.0042,-0.0012,0.0046,-0.0078,0.0026,-0.0013) :
Distance to: Egyptian_1879bc:Nakht-Ankh
0.03738170 Egyptian:Egypt1AQ172
0.03746435 Egyptian:Egypt15AQ172
0.03825737 Egyptian:Egypt5AQ172
0.04069069 Sarah_Coptic
0.04156682 Egyptian:Egypt7AQ172
0.04232390 Egyptian:Egypt17AQ176
0.04328952 Egyptian:2AJ137
0.04453109 Egyptian:Egypt12AQ172
0.04459642 Egyptian:4AJ136
0.04474741 Egyptian:12AJ129
You have restarted the Afrocentric propaganda machine. So called African-Americans don't think, they will tell you yes, Amen.
@@shafsteryellow Unfortunately, you’ve been lied to. DNA test done by DNA tribes proved the ancient Egyptians were black. Geneticist have also done Hair studies & skin tone studies which also proved they were black. Keep coping, because DNA contradicts your lies.🫵🤣🤣🤣
I'm a white woman in my mid 70's, from the UK.
Since my earliest days as a child and with a fascination of ancient Egypt the images and statues absolutely convinced me that the Pharaohs and people's of Egypt were black. I never had any doubt whatsoever.
My beliefs caused me many problems during my school years as I stubournly refused to accept the blatantly ridiculous teachings or withdraw my remarks.
My education was pretty standard but in my spare time I researched so much and always hoped that the proof would be discovered within my lifetime and here it is! What a splendid lineage for the black people.
Thank you for this brilliant presentation and confirming my 70+ years of belief.
@withoutHistory Here is the result on G25 of the less distant people to an Egyptian of Old kingdom period :
Distance to: Egypt_OldKingdom:I6409 Sample (Coordinates : 0.029665247,0.13868540,-0.047587444,-0.14426329,-0.0022221347,-0.063518622,-0.014261081,-0.013556098,0.087986490,0.0041161682,-0.0028172711,-0.019512651,0.055365686,0.0068209691,0.0071103512,0.014172621,-0.0011899901,-0.019799603,-0.021658496,0.032836460,-0.0024145371,-0.010472191,-0.0046426664,-0.0034683108,0.0029676763) :
0.06665294 Yemenite_Dhamar:Y382
0.07180916 Yemenite_Mahra:Y326
0.07237610 Egypt_Old_Middle_Kingdom:I10020
0.07347411 Yemenite_Amran:Y542
0.07355550 Yemenite_Dhamar:Y036
0.07409015 BedouinB:HGDP00624
0.07453930 Yemenite_Dhamar:Y038
0.07454369 BedouinB:HGDP00651
0.07494247 Yemenite_Mahra:Y345
0.07549846 Yemenite_Al_Jawf:Y221
No one is Black African.
Dynastic Egypt wasn't black but very mixed:
=> Nakht-Ankh - Deir Rifeh cemetery, Middle Egypt (3829 ybp) : Haplogroup H-Z19080.
=> TT320-CCG61065 - Valley of the Kings (3360ybp) : Haplogroup J-L267.
=> KV62 - Valley of the Kings (3285 ybp) : Haplogroup R-M343.
=> KV46Y - Valley of the Kings (3360 ypb) : G-P15.
=> Unknown Man E - Deir el Bahari (Royal Egypt) : Haplogroup E-V38.
Here are the G25 result of Nakht-Ankh (0.0012,0.129,-0.044,-0.0965,-0.0031,-0.0534,-0.017,-0.0078,0.0551,-0.0049,0.0138,-0.0172,0.0306,-0.0015,0.0069,-0.0072,-0.0111,0.0053,-0.004,0.0042,-0.0012,0.0046,-0.0078,0.0026,-0.0013) :
Distance to: Egyptian_1879bc:Nakht-Ankh
0.03738170 Egyptian:Egypt1AQ172
0.03746435 Egyptian:Egypt15AQ172
0.03825737 Egyptian:Egypt5AQ172
0.04069069 Sarah_Coptic
0.04156682 Egyptian:Egypt7AQ172
0.04232390 Egyptian:Egypt17AQ176
0.04328952 Egyptian:2AJ137
0.04453109 Egyptian:Egypt12AQ172
0.04459642 Egyptian:4AJ136
0.04474741 Egyptian:12AJ129
You have restarted the Afrocentric propaganda machine. So called African-Americans don't think, they will tell you yes, Amen.
Cool story. Now go back to your old folks home, Karen.
😎👍
Yes I am 60 and loved reading about the Egyptians and knew right away that they had to be black because of the hieroglyphics on the walls. White people have never as a race wore braids like black people and in Carthage they would wear braids so I believe a lot of people of that time was black. Jesus in the Bible is describe as wooly hair and bronze in color but people say does it matter. IT does
Black people are the most hated people in this world as a race. Jesus said we would be.Why do you think Moses told Pharoah God said let my people go because they were all black including the Pharoah and the slaves.🎉
Why do you mention the colour of your skin?
Asking if Ancient Egyptians were White or Black is like asking if purple is red or blue. In the Old World, race is a continuum.
Not really. You can see art and we now know the genetic makeup of Kushites (black) and Thebians (Whitish Egyptian).
@@AETorrePuertoYes Black's is the most diverse race we have all shade's of eye's and hair... That's why we so unique yes he is intelligent 🤷🏽prove it wrong
@AETorrePuerto we ain't black as cushions maybe afars and oromos buy for sure somalis aint
@@kieshamatthews5800 Yes, black is so diverse it is actually the largest group of races compared to the rest of the humans. However, the DNA of ancient North Egyptians, Libians and Berbers is close to that of ancient Canaaneans, Hitites and Mesopotamians, not to any ancient black races. The black Egyptians were the Kushites. Which at some point after the New Kingdom took over the entire Nile for a period. Later rulers were Greek, however, the composition of commoners of norther Caucasian Egyptians and southern black Nubians remained mostly the same.
I see it as pointless trying to claim the Mediterranean shores above the Sahara. It's like Turkey. In ancient world Anatolia, the mainland belonged to the Hitites, while the west shores to the Greek which was mostly a bunch of city-States interconnected by sea rather than land. Similarly, Egypt and Mesopotamia was interconnected by river. On the Magreg, the Berbers ruled the land while the Carthageans ruled the shores.
Not really wh!t3s are 2 to 4000 years old, they have no genetic connection to ancient civilisations
The evidence is undeniable. Great work.
So they black or nah?
@@I.am.hooked they are black.
@@I.am.hooked100% YES BLACK
@@nina2592 ok, nice. Thank you. ☺️
And then they keep pretending the noses just "fell off" all of those statues. 😂
As an art historian, I was told that that the next king had the noses chopped off. Well to heck with that. Proud of you! Finally, overwhelmingly, you blew that out of the water. So, all the people I taught, who worshipped Egypt and Egyptian art, like myself, were in awe of black Egypt, all the while, LOL, like I always from early childhood, in love with the hairstyles, dress and good looks of African people. I am from Carthage, Missouri, where the library housed Carthagenian artifacts. Good thing. Bless all of you.
The problem that statues with broken nose are few and there a lot of statues with its noses intact even though the statues with noses broken still look Egyptian but it seems that you want to falsify the history and fake it to make it suit your claims.
all this statues are fitting Modern Egyptians from north of Egypt and south of Egypt even the statues with broken noses fitting the modern egyptians
What if they did lol
@@Bella-egyptian1 To there a lot of statues with broken noses... Some archeologists also destroyed ancient artifacts as well to try to cover up the history...
@@PR-WAY They are trying to erase a history that was not theirs and trying to lie about it ...
the further back you go in history it gets blacker & blacker.... well-done brother!
Well said!!
You're not actually wrong, however, timelines are important to note. Ancient Egypt came about looonnnngggg after our species branched out of Africa. 2000 to 3000 years ago is not significantly different from what you observe today. 10000 years ago all people were likely "black", We know the changes were happening around that time. So, the Egyptians today are fairly close to the Egyptians then. This video is full of shit though.
Well done ❤️❤️❤️❤️💯💯💯💯💯💯
Brilliant thank y’all 😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊❤❤❤❤❤
@@jessenoreligionno5731 Unfortunately, you’ve been lied to. DNA test done by DNA tribes proved the ancient Egyptians were black. Geneticist have also done Hair studies & skin tone studies which also proved they were black. Keep coping, because DNA contradicts your lies.🫵🤣🤣🤣
Thank you ❤ When people finally realize they loose nothing telling the truth about Ancient Egypt is when we will finally be able to move forward and even greater as a whole. This was truthful and beautiful. ❤
"Lose".
Given the state of your knowledge how do you know "this was truthful"?
The truth is Herodotus (Greek historian), writing more than 2,500 years ago.. according to him, Egyptians totally renounced any connection whatsoever to the Afriocan race. And if one looks at the history of Sub-Saharan black and Egyptians, that further tells us that there was absolutely no connection whatsoever. Sub-Saharan ppl never produced anything of wealth, they never built anything other than what could be quickly made from twigs and sticks, they did not possess the abilities to read and write. Nor did they even possess the knowledge of the wheel. When Europeans arrived in Africa in 1500 AD era...it was as if time had stood still for over ten thousand years. To acquire whit man's material items (linen was the big item of trade) thAfricans invented the slave trade.
@@Stoney1959 Total utter racist lie. How do you get that ignorant?
The funny thing is you somehow think you are superior.
Well you know what they say, "The dumber they are... the more they vote for Trump."
Then how do you explain Mansa Musa 1280 AD the richest man to ever live? Oh yeah, pretty sure he had the wheel when he made his pilgrimage to Meca
@@ryancharles4031 LOL
A little intuitive thought... You see, peoples of sub-Saharan Arica *produced no wealth,* no coinage, no monetary system; and no physical structures other than huts made of twigs and sticks. . So there ws no ledgers of course to document his real wealth (again, no ability to read/write/ do arithmetic).
This is yet another FAKE history invention to puff african. This guy likely never existed - since there is no record of his existence. Wikipedia is also in on the FAKE history..
VERY Informative and extremely in depth descriptions. The fact that you ask any who has an opposing view to back up their opinion with citing sources for their opinion is what makes me appreciate this post even more!
I've always suspected that the damages in almost all the Egyptian Pharaoh's statues noses were deliberate to conceal the true ethnicity identity of them
@TeeTeeX290
No the reason was Iconoclasm
*Deface the god, kill his power.*
A Muslim imam was the one
who ordered the nose of the
Sphinx to be pried off. This
action caused a riot and the
Sultan had the imam put to
death. This was centuries
before Napoleon was
in Egypt
ISIS did the same thing to the
winged bulls and lions (with a
human head) found in Babylon
and Assyria (Iraq and Syria)
BTW: Islam was not and still
is not a benign force in regards
to Blacks.
The East African and Central
African slave trade (to the
headwaters of the Congo,
etc) sent millions into
slavery during the early
days of Islam to Arabia and
during the entire span of
the Ottoman empire.
It lasted many more centuries
longer than the Transatlantic
slave trade.
Furthermore, Muslims in Sudan
still enslave the Christian and
Pagan Blacks within greater
Sudan (Sudan, Darfur, South
Sudan) The same occurs in
Ethiopia and the Horn of Africa.
[Slavery is alive and well in
Africa as well as in Saudi
Arabia.-- To this day.
Also, the messenger called
Mohammad was an
enslaver as well as a
robber, murderer and
pedophile.
Very true. Black people broke the noses to hide the fact they were white
Respectfully....That's so juvenile. ....
Noses in every cultures statues break off. Is this like your first time ever looking into history? The fact that this was upvoted is sad. Noses break off on statues because they’re relatively exposed. Any sort of fall, the first thing that hits the ground is the nose. In weather, things erode and the fist thing to fall off would be a nose or any other exposed bits.
Imagine being this dumb.
Of coure it was deliberate. Anyone who thinks otherwise is an idiot.
As it is written, “in the last days, knowledge shall increase.” Dan 12:4 Truth and Justice shall Prevail. Thank you
❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤
Yes
(1) How is this relevant to the topic? (2) Whose last days? The last days of the country of Judea ended early in the first century AD (CE) by order of a Roman emperor. Dan was written before the compilation of the Judaic scriptures in the 5th C. BC (BCE). There is no way any prophet at that time not only could, or be interested in writing about something that might happen more than 2,500+ years later. He was writing to his own people. In the 5th C. BC (BCE), when the written compilation of what Christians call the Old Testament, was made at the order of a king, they would not have included writings of someone they considered so crazy to predict the literal future, and more importantly, nor would they have found any relevance to their current lives. They included inspirational and historical religious teachings attributed to their venerable hero, Moses and respected prophets. They would and could not have imagined that the writings were intended for people all over the earth in an unbelievably remote future. Nor would the prophet Dan, originally. What does the "end of days" even mean, then or now? I submit it is simply another way of saying, "in the great by and by" or "someday". It is a statement of faith. NOT a prediction of the future.
Amen 🙏 Praying for the restoration of the Truth in everything.
@@judy-carolbell314thanks for being sane and smart
Discussing the hair made me want to cry, because I am 66 years and I and my descendants have been mocked for having kinky curly hair and not being allowed to wear our historical hairstyles without it being considered inappropriate for the work place.
Your rights are in the law books and so therefore you have to look it up...
Know what your rights are and then you'll have power over those who are oppressing you...🤔
This should give clues as to their colllective fear of who we really are. People dont go thru this much trouble (such as banning our books & history in schools, & still worried about our natural hair & hairstyles in 2024?) for their inferiors? Common sense should tell us you also dont copy or emulate your inferiors either.
Are you trying to say that white people today hate black people.but also secretly are jealous of "black" American culture? If so, that's a pretty ballsy statement when most B ppl are wearing European brand clothing (Gucci, Prada, Adidas, Nike, Versace) while at the same time wearing bring blonde/ginger red weaves and hair dye or ACTUALLY buying hair actual hair lol
Take it easy with all that because it is REALLY easy to use it against ya.
I'm in Australia and have your grandchildren as friends, they love their hair!
Google 'The Crown Act.'
Has anyone else noticed that in copies of ancient Egyptian art sold to people around the world, the copies made in Egypt all have darker skin tones than the ones made in the west? Artwork in the west usually make Egyptians in artwork look white.
Exactly … and this has been known forever I don’t know why people fought the so obvious
Even Jesus looks Whiter than White!🚩
@@ramseyebryant because then they would have to admit to themselves and others that the whole one race being better than others is . . . Baloney.
If you delve far enough into some older history books, you will not believe the mind pretzels white people used to twist their minds into in order to explain everything cool on the continent of Africa had to be invented by mysterious white people. (Arabs need not apply. Not white enough.)
I caught the tail end of this when one of my elementary teachers told our class, "Africa has no history." They literally used to teach that.
At about 9 years of age, I wasn't buying it. I figured maybe it was really OLD history and someone had lost the records or something because of the history being so old.
Listen whenever you go to European countries such as Italy, Germany, England and so forth. You will always be subjugated with the real and the true influence of people and scholars of black economic mexicity. With no qualms about it. It is only here when you reach the Americas and places around that have a casting system that you will meet the fate of scholars that were black. In the beginning of time who have turned d*** there. European, as they have clung onto hope through the eyes of Europeans, european people have always been popular with creating their own despair in their own. Identity and history through pictures books etc be very punctual. Read between the lines as they are always identified with lying. They have been noticed late. Identify with stealing customs cultures, land language, and any other thing they can think of for the sole purpose of taking over. It's a disgusting way of life. But they are the only people on Earth that have been recognized for doing this all over the world and mainly to people of Hebrew, descent or of Afro descent. Peoples that are melanated Indians in such people that don't want to identify with their April lineage. It's and such. They have been notably dishonest about the affluent origin and gene pool of indians, native americans and other scholars that were indigenous to many lands far and wide because of their remark list to be superior
This tube is poop
4 comments can only see 1
I appreciate what you do with honesty, humility and integrity! I am learning everyday! Unlearning and relearning!
Absolutely. Today, we are unlearning and then, relearning. Otherwise, one day very soon, we will look up and find ourselves, illiterate.
My problem always is, why the hell did the Egyptians draw themselves with such light skin, as compared to the way they drew the Nubians?...I mean...that's the thing that, for me, is always clearly against the idea that the ancient Egyptians were black...it's hard for me to understand how anyone can ignore that fact, lol...were all those drawings from "after the Kehmet period", lol?...
The DNA Tribes study, which used an 8-STR marker analysis to conclude that the royal Egyptian mummies (like those of King Tutankhamun and others) were of Sub-Saharan African ancestry, has been met with substantial skepticism and criticism. There are several key points to consider when evaluating the validity of this study:
Background of the DNA Tribes Study
DNA Tribes is a private company that offered commercial genetic ancestry analysis using a set of 21 autosomal STR markers. In 2012, DNA Tribes analyzed data from the published results of a 2010 study by Zahi Hawass and his team, which involved the royal mummies, including Tutankhamun and Amenhotep III. The original 2010 study by Hawass et al. had focused on identifying familial relationships among the mummies using a small set of STR markers.
DNA Tribes took the allelic data from that study (8 STR markers, not the complete set used by the company) and compared them to their internal database of modern population STR profiles. They then published an analysis suggesting a closer genetic affinity between the mummies and modern Sub-Saharan African populations based on these STR profiles.
Major Concerns and Limitations of the DNA Tribes Study
Small Number of STR Markers (8 STRs):
The analysis was based on only 8 STR markers, which is insufficient for making reliable or detailed conclusions about ancestry or population affinity. As discussed earlier, using just 8 STR markers is problematic due to the limited resolution and potential overlap in allele frequencies across different populations.
In the context of ancestry analysis, having so few STR markers can lead to broad and potentially misleading results because it does not capture enough genetic information to differentiate between closely related populations accurately.
Allele Frequency Overlap:
STRs can exhibit high variability between individuals, but not necessarily in a way that uniquely distinguishes populations. Allele frequency overlaps between groups (especially between geographically proximate populations in North Africa, East Africa, and Sub-Saharan Africa) can make definitive conclusions difficult with such a small set of markers.
The database used by DNA Tribes might not have fully accounted for these overlaps, which can lead to conclusions that are skewed or not statistically robust.
Interpretation and Statistical Analysis:
DNA Tribes compared the allele frequencies of the 8 STR markers to their proprietary database of modern population groups. This database, however, may not have been comprehensive or consistent with other datasets used by the scientific community. In any ancestry analysis, the choice and size of the reference database play a crucial role in the conclusions.
Additionally, the methodologies for comparing these allelic frequencies and arriving at conclusions were not well-documented or peer-reviewed in scientific literature, making it hard to evaluate the validity of their claims independently.
Context of the Original Data:
The 2010 study by Hawass et al. did not aim to study population affinity but rather focused on identifying familial relationships between mummies. The 8 STR markers used in the original study were chosen for forensic and kinship purposes, not for broader population genetics or ancestry conclusions.
Using allelic data collected for one purpose (familial relationships) and repurposing it for another (population affinity) can introduce biases or misinterpretations.
Lack of Peer Review and Scientific Consensus:
The DNA Tribes study was not published in a peer-reviewed scientific journal, which is a significant limitation in terms of scientific credibility. The absence of peer review makes it difficult to assess the study's methods, statistical analyses, and conclusions against established standards in population genetics.
The broader scientific community has not accepted the conclusions drawn by DNA Tribes, and reputable scholars in Egyptology and population genetics have questioned the methodology and findings.
Ancient DNA Degradation and Contamination Concerns:
Ancient DNA studies require careful extraction and analysis methods due to the degraded and often contaminated nature of ancient DNA samples. The reliability of ancient DNA data depends heavily on the quality and authenticity of the DNA extracted.
While the 2010 study by Hawass et al. claimed to have extracted authentic DNA from the mummies, ancient DNA research requires highly rigorous protocols to minimize contamination risks. Without direct validation and more comprehensive genetic data, conclusions drawn from such ancient samples remain tentative.
Summary: Is the DNA Tribes Study Valid?
The DNA Tribes study, which used 8 STR markers to conclude that the royal Egyptian mummies were of Sub-Saharan African affinity, is not considered a scientifically valid or robust study by most population geneticists and Egyptologists. Here’s why:
Insufficient Genetic Data: Analyzing only 8 STR markers is not enough to make precise or definitive claims about population ancestry, especially in the context of complex population histories like that of ancient Egypt.
Methodological Issues: The methods used by DNA Tribes were not adequately detailed or subjected to peer review. The reliance on a proprietary and potentially incomplete database adds to the concerns.
Scientific Consensus: The broader academic community does not support the findings of the DNA Tribes study. Peer-reviewed genetic studies on ancient Egyptian remains often involve larger numbers of markers or SNPs, with more nuanced conclusions about population affinity.
While the results of the DNA Tribes analysis are an interesting hypothesis, they do not stand up to scientific scrutiny due to the limited dataset and methodological issues. Thus, its conclusions should be viewed with caution and not taken as definitive evidence of the royal mummies’ ancestry. More comprehensive studies using ancient DNA from multiple mummies and employing genome-wide analysis techniques would be needed to draw reliable conclusions about the ancestry of ancient Egyptians.
I don’t remember where I saw the info, but the oldest pottery shards in Egypt are the same as west Africa at that time. They’re even in a museum sometime(I think).
The DNA Tribes study, which used an 8-STR marker analysis to conclude that the royal Egyptian mummies (like those of King Tutankhamun and others) were of Sub-Saharan African ancestry, has been met with substantial skepticism and criticism. There are several key points to consider when evaluating the validity of this study:
Background of the DNA Tribes Study
DNA Tribes is a private company that offered commercial genetic ancestry analysis using a set of 21 autosomal STR markers. In 2012, DNA Tribes analyzed data from the published results of a 2010 study by Zahi Hawass and his team, which involved the royal mummies, including Tutankhamun and Amenhotep III. The original 2010 study by Hawass et al. had focused on identifying familial relationships among the mummies using a small set of STR markers.
DNA Tribes took the allelic data from that study (8 STR markers, not the complete set used by the company) and compared them to their internal database of modern population STR profiles. They then published an analysis suggesting a closer genetic affinity between the mummies and modern Sub-Saharan African populations based on these STR profiles.
Major Concerns and Limitations of the DNA Tribes Study
Small Number of STR Markers (8 STRs):
The analysis was based on only 8 STR markers, which is insufficient for making reliable or detailed conclusions about ancestry or population affinity. As discussed earlier, using just 8 STR markers is problematic due to the limited resolution and potential overlap in allele frequencies across different populations.
In the context of ancestry analysis, having so few STR markers can lead to broad and potentially misleading results because it does not capture enough genetic information to differentiate between closely related populations accurately.
Allele Frequency Overlap:
STRs can exhibit high variability between individuals, but not necessarily in a way that uniquely distinguishes populations. Allele frequency overlaps between groups (especially between geographically proximate populations in North Africa, East Africa, and Sub-Saharan Africa) can make definitive conclusions difficult with such a small set of markers.
The database used by DNA Tribes might not have fully accounted for these overlaps, which can lead to conclusions that are skewed or not statistically robust.
Interpretation and Statistical Analysis:
DNA Tribes compared the allele frequencies of the 8 STR markers to their proprietary database of modern population groups. This database, however, may not have been comprehensive or consistent with other datasets used by the scientific community. In any ancestry analysis, the choice and size of the reference database play a crucial role in the conclusions.
Additionally, the methodologies for comparing these allelic frequencies and arriving at conclusions were not well-documented or peer-reviewed in scientific literature, making it hard to evaluate the validity of their claims independently.
Context of the Original Data:
The 2010 study by Hawass et al. did not aim to study population affinity but rather focused on identifying familial relationships between mummies. The 8 STR markers used in the original study were chosen for forensic and kinship purposes, not for broader population genetics or ancestry conclusions.
Using allelic data collected for one purpose (familial relationships) and repurposing it for another (population affinity) can introduce biases or misinterpretations.
Lack of Peer Review and Scientific Consensus:
The DNA Tribes study was not published in a peer-reviewed scientific journal, which is a significant limitation in terms of scientific credibility. The absence of peer review makes it difficult to assess the study's methods, statistical analyses, and conclusions against established standards in population genetics.
The broader scientific community has not accepted the conclusions drawn by DNA Tribes, and reputable scholars in Egyptology and population genetics have questioned the methodology and findings.
Ancient DNA Degradation and Contamination Concerns:
Ancient DNA studies require careful extraction and analysis methods due to the degraded and often contaminated nature of ancient DNA samples. The reliability of ancient DNA data depends heavily on the quality and authenticity of the DNA extracted.
While the 2010 study by Hawass et al. claimed to have extracted authentic DNA from the mummies, ancient DNA research requires highly rigorous protocols to minimize contamination risks. Without direct validation and more comprehensive genetic data, conclusions drawn from such ancient samples remain tentative.
Summary: Is the DNA Tribes Study Valid?
The DNA Tribes study, which used 8 STR markers to conclude that the royal Egyptian mummies were of Sub-Saharan African affinity, is not considered a scientifically valid or robust study by most population geneticists and Egyptologists. Here’s why:
Insufficient Genetic Data: Analyzing only 8 STR markers is not enough to make precise or definitive claims about population ancestry, especially in the context of complex population histories like that of ancient Egypt.
Methodological Issues: The methods used by DNA Tribes were not adequately detailed or subjected to peer review. The reliance on a proprietary and potentially incomplete database adds to the concerns.
Scientific Consensus: The broader academic community does not support the findings of the DNA Tribes study. Peer-reviewed genetic studies on ancient Egyptian remains often involve larger numbers of markers or SNPs, with more nuanced conclusions about population affinity.
While the results of the DNA Tribes analysis are an interesting hypothesis, they do not stand up to scientific scrutiny due to the limited dataset and methodological issues. Thus, its conclusions should be viewed with caution and not taken as definitive evidence of the royal mummies’ ancestry. More comprehensive studies using ancient DNA from multiple mummies and employing genome-wide analysis techniques would be needed to draw reliable conclusions about the ancestry of ancient Egyptians.
Am a plain Nilotic from Kenya my grand parent didn't have any formal education yet they knew we came from Egypt and we share a lot with people from west Africa in language appearance and Physicality.
@@rockmusic175 You came from Egypt?! Your ancestors didn’t have a single multi level structure until a few decades ago and you want people to believe your ancestors built ancient Egypt.Ancient Egyptians were using the wheeled chariots since 4000 years ago. Your ancestors didn’t know the wheel existed until 150 years ago.How does that make any sense to you?!
@@st3019 Boss when people migrate to new places. They often need to cope with new environment, sometimes their entire way of life is changed. That does not mean it never existed. Wheel was not the only notable thing that existed in ancient Egypt, in fact the wheel was largely used by elites n military.
@@rockmusic175 No Boss , it doesn’t work that way.if you check other migration’s history, in every single case there is stuff that new comers bring to the new place . You can see it when Europeans came to Americas and everywhere. Meanwhile, there is not one single trace of that “ migration to south “ you talk about and you know why ?! Bc that “ migration “ NEVER happened.
No multi level building, no written language, no wheeled chariots , no cities. You really think they forgot everything?! Let’s not deceive ourselves boss.
@@rockmusic175 No Boss ! It doesn’t work that way . In every single case when people migrate to new areas they bring the knowledge of techniques and way of life and adopt those to the new environments. You can see that when europeans came to Americas and every other case .
Meanwhile, there is not one single trace of that “migration “ you talk about and we all know why . Bc that “ migration “ NEVER happened.
No wheeled chariots, no multi level structures, no cities. My Boss , let’s just not deceive ourselves.
@@st3019They were not making a claim and we're barely aware that there was a struggle involved over that heritage. They were just passing their history as they knew it. My grandfather, then about 80 in 1979, told me some of our ancestors came from "Hakum". I asked him where Hakum was and he told me it was north of Esiopia... He knew how to read but was educated to read the Bible and thus was exposes to no other reading material. Well, in 2012, I saw writing talking of some people known as Thagicu who settled on the north of Mt Kenya from Axum in 300 AD. The Kuria on the Kenya-Tanzania state in their myths directly and without a shadow of doubt that they came from Kemet. Again, it's not some claim they are making, just stating their history. They're not asking anyone to believe it
I am glad you are using hard data. I am also glad you are welcoming challenges to your presentation, with the clause that hard data or reasoning on hard data be presented. I was fortunate enough to have personally attended the lectures of Dr. John Henrick Clarke, Professor James Smalls, Dr. Leonard Jefferies, Dr. Wade Nobles, Dr. Ivan van Sertima, Dr. Yosef Ben-Jochannan , Dr Frances Cress Welsing and others. So I yearn for information to presented in a clear and erudite manner. This information needs to be put together in a cohesive and scholarly manner, which you have done. The VISUALS are so important. Keep up the work. Thanks
Sorry, but actual DNA testing on mummified Egyptians shows that ancient Egyptians of 5,000 years ago were not that much different than modern Egyptians of today, and had more genealogical commonality with their Mesopotamian neighbors than with sub-Saharan Africans.
Facts don't care about your blacks are EVERYTHING feelings. There are different races, and we didn't originate in africa. You're not more special than everyone else just because your bLaCk.
he's not though. Have you actualy looked at what he showed on screen?
@@44excalibur
That's a lie! Post that source!
@@FreethinkingPharoah It's the truth. Not a single historian or anthropologist will tell you any differently. Your problem is that you bought into that “We Were Kings” BS for so long, you believed it and accepted it just because some social justice warriors with no historical knowledge whatsoever told it to you. While there were African empires founded by black Africans, like the Kushite Dynasty and the Nubian Empire, and the Ghana Empire in western Africa, those civilizations aren't good enough for you. You all wish you could say that you were the ones who built those big pyramids, but Egypt was never yours.
Herodotus described Egyptians as dark skinned with wollyhair like their neighbours to South the Kushites. Unlike present day Europeans Herodotus had no agenda or racial Bias, he just simply described what he saw and what he thought of the people he encountered.
Rewriting History Began with the creation(fabrication) of the so called 'church'...which is also a crazy mess of facts buried in heaps & piles of...untruths...in & of itself.
There began the Patriarchy, woman hating, child molesting, skin fearing, stark raving insane bloodthirsty Evil conniving despicable leches we have in charge of Our world today.
Exactly
💯💯💯
Their own father of history 😅
Also remember the words of lepedis
" we entered the tomb expecting to see Egyptians.
Instead we found authentic Negros"
@@bigalsnow8199 Wow, I didn't know that... Thank You for the information.
As a scientist and artist - it was clear they were very black African from the art and sculptural works. Then you had invasions and migrations. I find it silly that these clearly evidenced facts are overlooked from the late 1880 on. Now with the genetic evidence, clearly better pictures can be presented to the public about what the old kingdom to the new kingdom people looked like. Thanks for this video!
Then as a scientist you should also know about the Eurasian backflow migration which transformed the genetics and cultures of North and East Africa beginning 30.000 yrs ago and into the Neolithic. It's no more credible pretending this didn't occur than pretending there wasn't also a black African connection through the Nile.
@@phil5365Those people were still black though ua-cam.com/video/Y3x5rWVib5s/v-deo.html
Stop grasping for straws!!! That ancient Eurasian "backflow" of the R1b Haplogroup was NOT the same strain of R1b that eventually produced modern-day Euasians!!! It was an older iteration entirely. So that Black African R1b Haplogroup that King Tit belonged to was not racially mixed as you Eucentricists and Ar@bcentrist are desperately trying to portray. King Tut's lineage was simply a Black African lineage of the R1b Haplogroup. Period. @@phil5365
@@phil5365correct.
@@phil5365Indeed. But genes don't equate to phenotypes and the ancient Europeans were black. The back migration from Europe was certainly from a black population because white skin evolved 8000 years ago.
A lot of people already knew they were black. However, a lot of people didn't want to admit it for some reason
that has to be the reason some of the mummies were Caucasian with red and blonde hair, you are so intelligent.
@@williamfowler616 "A lot of people already knew they were black". He can say this but it's only people like him who think this
And also, scientists did a study on a mummy from around 3ooo bc and it's genome showed that Egyptians actually had 7% European DNA with less Sub-Suharran DNA being very little.
@@EstbXCIII how come they are not black anymore and turned white with red and blonde hair?
@@williamfowler616a black person can have blonde or red hair
@@jwil2414 and white people can have black curly hair too.
The reason they don't want to admit that the ancient Egyptians were black is because they would then have to admit the children of Israel were black. How else could they blend in so well?
Why would they have to blend in?
Why do you religious Zealots do this? The bible is mythology! The ancient Egyptians/Nile valley civilization, they existed on this planet. You don't need to believe in a man made book or have faith that they existed on this planet. They left so much physical evidence like artifacts, temples, tombs and bodies of people with names who actually existed on the planet. You don't have to take my words by faith but go see for yourself!
Not at all, because they; like everyone else who does actual history know that the Israelites never existed, as a matter of fact, admitting Ancient Egypt was Afrika (Black) would kill their bible non-sense altogether because they stole the Religion for Ancient Egypt, and people would put two and two together and the lies about all those people in their book would go up in smoke.
So you haven't heard of the Israel Stela?@@MedjayCommander
@@SarahlabyrinthLHC because they were hunted
Thank You once again! I'm so happy and proud that your channel and others have become a collection of videos that should have been books on our library shelves long ago! Had people known the truth earlier, there might not have been so much depression and self-degradation among our people and many might have lived to reach for higher heights in life to bring great gifts to the world. Young folks, don't ever let anybody hold you back when you're reaching for a better world! You are descendants of the greatest!
Information was there many of us rejected it or would not pick up and read. Many of our people to this day can only learn from video but I bare witness our scholars have been trying to tell us, I know I was among them and there names will never be in books or videos
@@ekfreeman1 We were lied to most of the time. Today we have the technology to dispute a lot of what we called history. We can only imagine how many have passed on without the credit they deserve, unfortunately. I wonder like, what inventions and so on could have been made if our people recieved proper credit and were inspired to continue to contribute to the world. The timeline of mankind's progress would have been so much different with out the imposter's lies and greed, but that's the price all of humanity has to pay. All be blessed and stay strong!
a lot of people like myself (71) never believed that Pharaohs depicted and all of the statues were anything but people of African origin; I would just shrug and laugh to myself how blind people choose to be
@splashofun
I believe self-degradation was the intention of those who constructed the lies.
However, well said. 🙏🏿
Definitely should have been in our libraries and our schools!!!!!!
They were black. Everyone else on earth are newcomers
es in Sydney, AustraliaUpvoted by
Menna El Gendy
, lives in Egypt (2003-present)3y
Related
What do modern Egyptians think of black Americans and other groups appropriating their history and culture?
I have a largely Egyptian family.
They chuckle and move on. No Egyptians take this very seriously. They know Egypt never stopped existing nor were its people ever replaced or bred out.
They are the decendents of the ancients. Nothing will change their connection to their homeland.
They also dont really think of themselves as black or white, just Egyptian.
They were not newcomers, they evolved out of us.
Related
What are the reasons why people say Ancient Greeks were black?
This is fringe idea among black nationalists or black supremacists.
The problem started in the 19th century, and it revolves around the fact that Africa's history is mostly unknown to us. Sub-Saharan Africa never developed advanced civilizations like you saw in Egypt, Sumer, Greece, etc. Many people believed that more advanced = more civilized = better, and although this is an utterly stupid idea it is nonetheless an idea some people have.
Slavery was often justified in earlier generations through the argument that black people were 'inherently' inferior. As evidence of this inherent inferiority, people pointed out that Africa had no advanced civilization. (Again, dumb, but I'm just relating what someone else said) This argument needed to be disproven. Some people fixated on the possibility that certain advanced civilizations (such as the Egyptians) were located in Africa and probably had black people among them. They decided to claim Egypt as being 'black' (based upon scant evidence) because it advanced the idea that blacks were not inferior and slavery was, therefore, wrong.
These kinds of ideas continued to fester into the 20th century. They were promoted by organizations such as the Nation of Islam and repeated by black nationalists like Malcom X. The Nation of Islam was/is a radical black supremacist organization that promoted a pseudo-religious myth in which black people were the first and best people on Earth. Now, there is great evidence that humanity originated in Africa, but the Nation's version of this story is pretty out there. (Worth a Google, if you're bored)
Throughout most of America's history, white oppressors denied the possibility of black history or black identity. Schoolchildren were not taught African history, and black Americans did not inherit any history or culture from their ancestors. Not because Africa lacks historical records (sadly true) but because whites did not want blacks to know they had a homeland. I recall reading an excerpt from Malcom X in which he relates his shock and amazement when he discovered that Africans belonged to their own continent and culture. It allowed him to understand his identity and his place in the world, because he was now rooted in a culture that was understandable. If he had stopped there, he would have been doing alright. But he went on to repeat the claim of black Egyptians, not because the claim was grounded in historical evidence but rather because it filled an emotional need inside him.
And that's really the point of it all. Africans have little in the way of recorded history, so some people compensate by trying to appropriate the cultures of others. I've heard the same thing about ancient Carthage, and also about both sides of the Trojan War. I once heard someone claim that the Greek shield-spear combination described in antiquity was in fact referring to the Zulu's assegai and nguni. This is a completely asinine idea devoid of evidence, but people continue to repeat it because it gives them emotional satisfaction and validation to believe they are descended from notable people.
I can understand that black Americans had their own identity stolen and suppressed, and that is tragic and unforgivable. However, this fact does not give them license to appropriate other people's history in order to compensate.
31K views
View 169 upvotes
View 6 shares
1 of 40 answers
@@so9487no they didnt
@@twongreen9968Don't respond until you get some education on human origins.
I think half the problem of accepting black african heritage into the Egyptian ancestry came about because of arguments involving Cleopatra's Greek ancestry confusing the issue with unnecessary arguments. I'm glad that people have finally started resorting to DNA sampling to get definitive answers, instead of trying to rely on bloodlines from recorded history. DNA can say much more about a person's origins than might be carved in a rock for posterity's sake.
Thank you for continuing to affirm our indigenous contribution to this planet. The evidence, if read with unbiased lenses, unflinchingly speaks the truth of the Sons and Daughters of Africa steering the vessel of civilization!
Respect in the highest form doing your part to overturn the misinformation and presenting evidence in a clear structured manner.
I’ve been telling people for years that the ancient Egyptians were Black people.
Thank you for sharing this educational video.
And they are Tamerrikans land of Tamerri which is America
@@LacoleLacole Yes! They come Tameri/Tamerrikans!
@@LacoleLacole Cut the bull. The black race originated in Africa, not America. this also has ben scientifically proven.
Then you'll be surprised to find that Ancient Kemet aka Egypt was highly influenced by Peoples of the Levant, Sumer, and from the West, Iberia, modern France and Spain.
A Comprehensive study of DNA from the Ancient People and Kings/Pharaohs of Kemet/Egypt. The Bloodlines of the Monarchs and the Peoples.
Like no other Region on the Globe currently known, Egypt and Northern Africa has an Abundance of Remains that offer specimens for Genetic Studies.
It is Imperaitive to set forth the group descriptions, noting Kings/Pharohs that were of Public origins, ie: Generals that were handed the Kingship or usurped the Ruler to gain Kingship. Ramses is in this group. His family were not originally of the Royal Bloodlines, although they married within the group.
Nubians were in Upper Egypt, the South and were predominantly Black African.
The earlier Kings were influenced by the Bloodlines associated with peoples from the West and North of Egypt, the Ancient Mediterranean in constant movement, peoples that were Seafaring and land trekking towards the areas rich in resources, namely Food.
Th8s fata has absolutely been collected and studied, but withheld from the Public because it doesn't fit the "Mainstream Model"
Africa does not equate to must be Black, it is highly prevalent in % of Black, yet Indigenous White Groups exist, such as the N African Indigenous White Berbers, who are of Basque Origin.
It is a time for Mature Minded Ethical Facts, and this is unfolding at present.
B Bartlett
Sociologist/Behavioralist
and Historian
.
that has to be the reason some of the mummies were Caucasian with red and blonde hair, you are so intelligent.
Anyone can twist history to fit their narrative but you can't change science.
Especially, since the field of science is God's universe and global lands that is lended to humans by the creator. Period!!
Exactly! But I don’t understand why this channel keep twisting science about ancient Egypt?! Science and every single evidence shows that overwhelming majority of modern Egyptians are descendants of ancient Egyptians. But channels like this one keep misleading people into believing they ( ancient Egyptians) were subsaharan Africans. So pathetic!
Science changes all the time
Science says that the DNA of mummified Egyptians shows that the ancient Egyptians of 5,000 years ago were not much different than modern Egyptians of today, and that they had more commonalities with their neighbors in Mesopotamia than with sub-Saharan Africans.
Sorry, but actual DNA testing on mummified Egyptians shows that ancient Egyptians of 5,000 years ago were not that much different than modern Egyptians of today, and had more genealogical commonality with their Mesopotamian neighbors than with sub-Saharan Africans.
In my DNA test it reveals Black African HM King Pharaoh Ramsses II is my distant great granddad! One of the BEST videos I have ever seen speaking the truth. I am 50% African and 50% European and have always know this what you are saying is truth! Via DNA, haplogroup, phenotype, Egyptology, Ethnology. YOUR VIOES SHOW HAVE BILLIONS OF VIEW EACH!
When you want to see what Ancient Egyptian look like without the mass amounts of mixing from the Greeks, Arabs and then Turks or exodus, you just need to go look at the modern tribes in Somalia, Kenya, Ethiopia and Eritrea and Uganda. That is how the Ancient Egyptians looked prior to the invasions by the Persians, Greeks, Romans, Arabs and then Turks!
Sudan is where you find what the Ancient Egyptians looked like
@@Taharqo.saved.the.Hebrew The Arabs went into Sudan pretty heavy too!
Excellent statement, just drop the word "tribe". It brings to mind simple people wearing grass skirts, living in buffalo skin teepees, in small social groups of 70 - 80 people with no cities, no significant industry/economy/ law/government, hunting and gathering with some small subsistence farming. This describes many tribes living in the Amazon until this day, and even accurately describes places like pre-Roman Germany where they lived in tiny communities of 70 families, had no established government structure, no major economy or industry with mainly subsistence living, and built no roads or cities of any kind. This does NOT describe African people - who had a sophisticated urban cultures along with rural cultures, cities full of comfortable well-constructed houses, city streets and roads, city walls and gates, standing militaries, sophisticated government/industry/societal/economic systems, beautiful well-made clothing and jewelry, beautiful horse cavalry, metallurgy, livestock, agriculture, etc. The actual "tribes" in Africa are very few, and are only found in the extremely rural parts of the continent such as the Kahalari Bushmen and the Twa people (pygmies.) The vast majority Africans either live in sophisticated urban cities, medium sized towns, or small villages, BUT THE EUROCENTRIC MEDIA TRIES TO SHOW US ONLY THE MOST REMOTE AND EXTREMELY RURAL AFRICANS TO REPRESENT ALL OF AFRICA, and the word "tribe" is used to describe African civilizations which is absolute bullsh*t. Use words like ethnic group, kingdom, empire, civilization, etc. to describe African societies, or you can use the generic term "people" as in the Hausa People, or Akan people, never use the word tribe ever again please, unless you're talking about "actual" African tribes like the Bushmen. Let's get ahead of the game👊
The Arabs are the result of the mixing with outsiders.
@arronfrazier
Agreement. 🙏🏿
I actually worked in a museum when an ancient Egyptian sarcophagus was opened and the mummy’s DNA was tested.. I was also able to see “her” hair.. she was black.. like me.
Do you really think that people believe your hoax story?! Not a single mummy looks black African . NONE . Even Cushitic people were closer to west Eurasians than black Africans.
@@st3019Cushitic people are most likely older than Europeans...so Europeans got their features from them.
Well I don’t know what dna tests she’s referring to ! Why did she lied about “ working in Egyptian museums “ and “ dna tests showed she was black” ! We both know she’s lying. I guarantee you she didn’t even ever visit Egypt at all . Not a single Egyptian mummy looks like west and Central Africans .
😂😂😂
Will a group of blacks come after hundreds of years to claim that America is the land of your ancestors just because groups of blacks lived there or were ruled by a black person like Obama?
Thank you for your channel & all the important history you share! I will be rewatching this😍
I'll say it again, Herodotus said that during his decades living in Egypt, the Egyptians would often brag about being descended from the most ancient peoples on earth across the Atlantic. Thoth also told the Europeans he'd come from across the Atlantic.
Interesting!
I have never understood why the heritage of the ancient Kemetu was ever a debate. Anyway… great video
Because the Europeans had a demonic intentions to stolen birth rights the European has removed us from his-story the sovereign America Indian ne-gro people.
Their Fear is why...like everything else..they fear people figuring it out...undoing their generations of carefully woven webs of lies.
& some of them believe if they ignore it it will go away.
They like African / black culture and want to claim it for themselves
@@NuLiForm It’s not actually debatable. We all know ancient Kemet are the ancestors of overwhelmingly modern day Egyptians.
This debate started when some raxe hoaxers in blk communities started to try to blackwash the history of ancient Egypt/Kemet.
It was never a debate until subsaharan Afrocentric hoaxers started to blackwash the history of ancient Egypt/Kemet
the DNA results solidified it for me... I already believe they were black
I would like to preface this answer with the following development: UA-camrs such as Dane Calloway are Teaching African/black Americans that They are the real Indigenous people of the Americas, and that Native Americans are all “$5.00 Indians”. Though this Really Bothered me, as an Actual Indigenous person, I didn’t do anything about it. Freedom of speech being my main objective in leaving them alone, for the most part.
I also view them as a sort of ‘flat earth’ type society. They don’t believe in the science of DNA because that would Prove they originate in Africa, just as DNA from our ancient graves have already proven that We are the descendents of the people who came here thousands upon thousands of years ago. Even tens of thousands of years ago.
What has happened since then, is that the STUDENTS of Dane Calloway and others (Dane Calloway has over 35,000,000 views on his channels, and has become very well off as result of pushing this nonsense) have become violent and racist, threatening Native Americans that I know on Tik Tok and Instagram! My friends have had to contact police, as they consider the Death Threats to be very Serious!
Black Americans that believe that they are the real Indigenous people and that Native Americans are ‘$5.00 Indians, feel Entitled to attack our people as they view US as the Aggressor! This is what they have been taught by Dane Calloway
💯💯💯😎👍
What dna results did ever show they were black ?! Can you cite one ?
@@st3019 He won’t because he can’t
@st3019 he quoted a milliom sources. 😂😂😂yoa even watch this?
At 22:05 the narrator names the king depicted as Hor Aha, the successor of Narmer (First Dynasty, c. 3000 BCE). The statue shown however, is the wooden ka sculpture of a far later ruler named Au-ib-Re Hor Thirteenth Dynasty, c. 1750 BCE.
The first settlers in northern Sudan 🇸🇩 date back 300,000 year's. It is home to the oldest Sub-Saharan African Kingdom, the Kingdom of Kush (about 2500-1500 B.C.E). This culture produced some of the most beautiful pottery in the Nile Valley, including Kerma beakers
I don't think that's true. The area was populated longer than that by people of that land and not a migration to the land. Inside of their museum in Sudan there is a miniature structure of an Ancient village one of the earliest ones that popped up throughout Africa. Those people were of that region and not migratory of that region .......I actually have a picture
Can we please stop using "Sub-Sahara". This is Eurocentric terminology that is meant to separate Africa, racially, economically and makes no geographic sense.
Word!!
@@lauwilliams-hn8qs It's a term for climate zones not people zones.Meant to refer to areas along the edge of the Saharan Desert which people have constantly undulated in long as it retreats and advances.
Finally..as a black Canadian woman, I need to know where I originate from..this is my starting point. Thank you❤
Do a DNA test
A DNA test would be far more accurate than the ramblings of a stranger on UA-cam.
You're more likely west African
Find a better source please. This video is false and intentionally misleading. You are being deceived by having your black supremacy tendancies exploited. It is targeting you to keep you separate from other humans.
The Bloodline referred to in this completely inaccurate video came about when ALL humans were black, 70,000 years ago. Don't believe a thing simply because you want to believe in it.
If the Ancient Egyptians were so call "Black" in skin complexion then the Hebrew Israelites also had to be black/brown in complexion because the Jewish people claiming Israel couldn't stomach the enormous heat in Egypt when Joseph was second in command under Pharoah in BC era.
First, Hebrew is a Greek word and the actual word is Haribu meaning to cross over the Nile/stars in the territory of Kush.
@@unapologeticmystic1703either way it's the same people
The Jews doing all that conquering was white people. Nebuchadnezzar and Alexander The great literally have the same story which is about Tyre.
Right
Correct, the ISRAELITES were and are black!
The Israeli government knows this, that's why they made a law against DNA tracing. No "Israeli" is allowed to have their DNA looked at.
New to all of this study-wise, I found it to be very informative. Thank you for sharing.
Why is that the most important think to Egyptologists is to prove that ancient Egyptians weren't black. They muddy the water and cause confusion by telling Africans that black people are trying to take their culture. We never broke into pyramids and stole gold and artifacts.
Yeah they did back then and not so much now.
The reason why they try to claim Egypt is because it's another attempt to hide the true identity of the people of The Book. A white Messiah couldn't hide in a black Egypt.
@@renaissancewoman100 It's proven that gold and artifacts were stolen ASAP by local bandits. Why do you piss off the maestria of the local robbers? Their IQ were high.
@@JulieBorges-l4zNow they jus wash the color off the paintings on the wall!!! Ancient Egypt aka Ham Land being black is nothing NEW!!!
@@JulieBorges-l4z Only because after centuries of pillaging there isn't as much left to steal.
I have debated many people on this subject . The busts alone of many Pharaohs clearly display who these people were. Great vid keep them coming
And they'll still deny the ancient Egyptians were black Africans 😂
So true, many busts and masks were painted with blue eyes. But still they deny.
So all of Africa was black except Egypt. Shut up.
@@musiqologistThey wanna deny African greatness lmao
It's such a comfort to hear people tell the truth, thank you. The pharaohs wrote where they were from, this confirms this statement.
It's such a comfort to lie to yourself, like you are doing right now.
On my first trip to Ghana, I saw the evidence everywhere I went that they are the descendants of the ancient Egyptians.
I could see that modern civilization came from them, and I was astounded by their craftsmanship everywhere I went.
There is no doubt in my mind that civilization started in the continent of Africa.
As a Bamileke, I know clearly realized what my parents were saying and doing all the time! excellent story and video! Many Thanks!
Yes sir there is an article from Indiana University that states Bamileke Medumba stems from ancient Egyptian language.
@@cdub11532 What remains to study is, how did we lose all that kemetic knowledge. Because we were basically at a disadvantage during the slavery times.
Thanks!
She's right about the intro part because I'm an African American who did an African ancestry DNA test. It showed my ancestors are from a certain West African country that I won't name & our particular tribe has its roots in Ancient Egypt. It's pretty exciting. It makes me wonder if the same race who enslaved the Black Hebrews are the race who enslaved my Black ancestors in America.
OMG she just said the exact country & tribe my maternal side descended from according to DNA test.. I just got goosebumps. And the USA schools taught me my history started with American slavery. Hog wash.
first of all, before the America's, Africans were selling each other to the trans-Saharan slave trade for thousands of years, the trans-Atlantic slave trade came after and within a few hundred years, it was the Caucasians who made it unacceptable, Africans enslaved Africans.
If you think some whitey was able to get off a boat and catch negores in their native lands...you got to be crazy.
Ergo the race that enslaved you has been the african one, just as Europeans enslaved other euros and Asians enslaved other Asians...
It all starts with our own insensitivity to our neighbour.
Hilariously stupid..
Yes, our ancestors 1st called them hyksos, then Roman's and Greek, now we call them European. They all used us as slaves because of our melanin genius. They claim everything we invented
Hi cousin.
@15:28 You didn't cite any study that was on screen or linked in the video description!
Your style of video creation is very smartly put together. Sonically perfect pauses & beats. I’m a fan🙌
My husband and my father both had E1B1a y-chromosome. We are African American. Autosomal show Bantu and Khoisan.
The ancestors settled the Americas. I found a book that describes the “costumes” of indigenous in America East of the Mississippi. It is NOTHING like the images presented in the media. Head shaving, wearing a roach on top of head, braiding that were identical to one you just showed encircled the head. Body tattoos and piercings, and the disks in the lips and earlobes. Lots of beads. Amazing similarities. ☺️☺️
You're not native American. You're not Egyptian. You're just a subsaharan bantu
U gotta be kidding me?!?!
Idi.t
Loooool
Here is the result on G25 of the less distant people to an Egyptian of Old kingdom period :
Distance to: Egypt_OldKingdom:I6409 Sample (Coordinates : 0.029665247,0.13868540,-0.047587444,-0.14426329,-0.0022221347,-0.063518622,-0.014261081,-0.013556098,0.087986490,0.0041161682,-0.0028172711,-0.019512651,0.055365686,0.0068209691,0.0071103512,0.014172621,-0.0011899901,-0.019799603,-0.021658496,0.032836460,-0.0024145371,-0.010472191,-0.0046426664,-0.0034683108,0.0029676763) :
0.06665294 Yemenite_Dhamar:Y382
0.07180916 Yemenite_Mahra:Y326
0.07237610 Egypt_Old_Middle_Kingdom:I10020
0.07347411 Yemenite_Amran:Y542
0.07355550 Yemenite_Dhamar:Y036
0.07409015 BedouinB:HGDP00624
0.07453930 Yemenite_Dhamar:Y038
0.07454369 BedouinB:HGDP00651
0.07494247 Yemenite_Mahra:Y345
0.07549846 Yemenite_Al_Jawf:Y221
No one is Black African.
Dynastic Egypt wasn't black but very mixed:
=> Nakht-Ankh - Deir Rifeh cemetery, Middle Egypt (3829 ybp) : Haplogroup H-Z19080.
=> TT320-CCG61065 - Valley of the Kings (3360ybp) : Haplogroup J-L267.
=> KV62 - Valley of the Kings (3285 ybp) : Haplogroup R-M343.
=> KV46Y - Valley of the Kings (3360 ypb) : G-P15.
=> Unknown Man E - Deir el Bahari (Royal Egypt) : Haplogroup E-V38.
Here are the G25 result of Nakht-Ankh (0.0012,0.129,-0.044,-0.0965,-0.0031,-0.0534,-0.017,-0.0078,0.0551,-0.0049,0.0138,-0.0172,0.0306,-0.0015,0.0069,-0.0072,-0.0111,0.0053,-0.004,0.0042,-0.0012,0.0046,-0.0078,0.0026,-0.0013) :
Distance to: Egyptian_1879bc:Nakht-Ankh
0.03738170 Egyptian:Egypt1AQ172
0.03746435 Egyptian:Egypt15AQ172
0.03825737 Egyptian:Egypt5AQ172
0.04069069 Sarah_Coptic
0.04156682 Egyptian:Egypt7AQ172
0.04232390 Egyptian:Egypt17AQ176
0.04328952 Egyptian:2AJ137
0.04453109 Egyptian:Egypt12AQ172
0.04459642 Egyptian:4AJ136
0.04474741 Egyptian:12AJ129
You have restarted the Afrocentric propaganda machine. So called African-Americans don't think, they will tell you yes, Amen.
Is it a roach or a Scarab?. The scarab was scared in ancient Egypt.
That’s cos America was always as diverse as Asia and Africa. Not just one race there were whites browns and blacks all in America just as there are today.
The first LIE they told is that ANCIENT Egypt is only 3000-5000 years old. The Ancient Egyptians Kings list is over 40,000 Years old. They had to decrease it so that they can add themselves in. 🙏🏿🤴🏾👸🏾🖤
Absolutely
That is proposed Egypt is not 40000.where did the ancient Egyptians wrote that? proof from records. That is impossible because many civilization ruins are under water in the ocean.
i think that u have a strong point here that i had not given thought to--it appears that they had to shorten the time frame so they could allow themselves in--because the white race was the last race we brought here about 7700 years ago
if the Chinese civilization was about 5000 years ago, how come the Egyptian civilization is about 3 to 5000 years?
you can see the inconsistencies in those inaccurate assessments made by white people who have had a long history of distorting history and they have not given up--only that now they are up against a more serious challenge with their lies that will soon die out
@@lactusgalacto1174Look it up, the Greeks called the Egyptians ANCIENT because when the arrived everything was already standing & ANCIENT. To date Europeans are still STUDYING AFRICA. 😜
@@randyeduoIndeed & when you look at Ancient China, India & Meso America you will see OUR Black African Faces! 🙏🏿🤴🏾👸🏾🙌🏾
This video is massive and mind-blowing.
Black people are the foundation of the world.
History, Science and Archaeology have told us all how great, cultural and fundamental black people were.
All the research is factual. Only people who refuse to look deeper and embrace reality will argue based on errors being told and taught based on political and social constructs.
Great research
Bravo brother 🩷👌
I recently traced my E haplogroup all the way back to the Y haplogroup of Kush and upper Egypt and finally to Nigeria.
This video is basically mapping my ancestors DNA migration.
@@amanokal5635 I all not a scientist, so take this information for what it is. But here is a video of me tracing my E haplogroup back to where it started is a Y haplogroup.
ua-cam.com/video/RAdg1s53E7Q/v-deo.htmlsi=tcxY3sTO5SdeqsNl
@@cardesignerchris you need to review your haplotype E u174 ( seen in your video) is a Subclade of EM2: haplotype E U174 reflects Bantu expansion . Haplotype E u174 top two population is US and Nigeria . Also Haplotype Note: I am not scientist. I didn’t see your test with your video previously , until now. I will delete my post out of respect for you . Weall begin in”East Africa.
I'm only a couple videos in for your channel but I'm hooked for sure. Really shifting the paradigm, thank you so much and more power to ya.
Not really
I just cant thank you enough for your dedication to this topic. Its completely necessary especially im this day and age when these Egyptologist want to white wash, hide and destroy our ancestors and there contributions to the civilization of the world.
Related
What are the reasons why people say Ancient Greeks were black?
This is fringe idea among black nationalists or black supremacists.
The problem started in the 19th century, and it revolves around the fact that Africa's history is mostly unknown to us. Sub-Saharan Africa never developed advanced civilizations like you saw in Egypt, Sumer, Greece, etc. Many people believed that more advanced = more civilized = better, and although this is an utterly stupid idea it is nonetheless an idea some people have.
Slavery was often justified in earlier generations through the argument that black people were 'inherently' inferior. As evidence of this inherent inferiority, people pointed out that Africa had no advanced civilization. (Again, dumb, but I'm just relating what someone else said) This argument needed to be disproven. Some people fixated on the possibility that certain advanced civilizations (such as the Egyptians) were located in Africa and probably had black people among them. They decided to claim Egypt as being 'black' (based upon scant evidence) because it advanced the idea that blacks were not inferior and slavery was, therefore, wrong.
These kinds of ideas continued to fester into the 20th century. They were promoted by organizations such as the Nation of Islam and repeated by black nationalists like Malcom X. The Nation of Islam was/is a radical black supremacist organization that promoted a pseudo-religious myth in which black people were the first and best people on Earth. Now, there is great evidence that humanity originated in Africa, but the Nation's version of this story is pretty out there. (Worth a Google, if you're bored)
Throughout most of America's history, white oppressors denied the possibility of black history or black identity. Schoolchildren were not taught African history, and black Americans did not inherit any history or culture from their ancestors. Not because Africa lacks historical records (sadly true) but because whites did not want blacks to know they had a homeland. I recall reading an excerpt from Malcom X in which he relates his shock and amazement when he discovered that Africans belonged to their own continent and culture. It allowed him to understand his identity and his place in the world, because he was now rooted in a culture that was understandable. If he had stopped there, he would have been doing alright. But he went on to repeat the claim of black Egyptians, not because the claim was grounded in historical evidence but rather because it filled an emotional need inside him.
And that's really the point of it all. Africans have little in the way of recorded history, so some people compensate by trying to appropriate the cultures of others. I've heard the same thing about ancient Carthage, and also about both sides of the Trojan War. I once heard someone claim that the Greek shield-spear combination described in antiquity was in fact referring to the Zulu's assegai and nguni. This is a completely asinine idea devoid of evidence, but people continue to repeat it because it gives them emotional satisfaction and validation to believe they are descended from notable people.
I can understand that black Americans had their own identity stolen and suppressed, and that is tragic and unforgivable. However, this fact does not give them license to appropriate other people's history in order to compensate.
31K views
View 169 upvotes
View 6 shares
1 of 40 answers
@@qnqmria you realize the genione for bright skin mutantion kicked in roughly around 15 thousand years ago right 😂 but I do enjoy the pure ignorance in ur trolling my advice ..do alittle more study and also diversafy ur choice of materials..u might enlighten who knows
@@qnqmria you are the copy and paste guy lol wow wat away to refute the video that you claimed u watched lol deflections are ur best offense.. Wow
@@qnqmriaand people like yourself are borderline insane!! We see all the evidence, you don’t because you reaallllly don’t want to! Smh😅😅😂😂😂
@@qnqmriaif you think ‘sub Saharan’ Africa didn’t have advanced civilization, that’s you. We know they did! We also know the diversity of Africas people. But we also know what is authentically African! And even before allll this evidence that is being beat against your head😂😂😂…we knew this. It’s not emotional, it’s almost spiritual, it’s a connection everyone else wants, but no matter how much they claim it, they don’t have. And what’s hilarious is we see there is no connection with any other people accept the African people. Could there have been some influence here and there from other cultures, probably so, since they traded with other cultures, and other cultures came to live down in the Nile valley and take on this African culture. But the very essence of this culture is nothing but African!! So I think it is people like you crying on UA-cam, despite alllllll the evidence, that are the emotional ones. This is apparently a hard pill for you and people in denial like yourself to swallow because you have this idea of what Africa is or isn’t, but just swallow it!! 😅😅 As you can see we don’t care about your emotions, we are going with facts to prove to the truth agin and again✌🏾✌🏾
Why are you surprised? ? We all came from Africa - it’s the birth place of humanity. Just my opinion.
Wrong
Humanity started in the Middle East before some migrated to Africa and became black.
@@bnjm8868 how does someone become black? we need answers to this Sir..
@@sillywonka8219 The same way someone becomes white. Genetic adaptation to one's environment or to a different environment from where one was born, but over about 200 years of generations. Those that migrated to and around the equator became darker and those who migrated away from the equator towards the poles became lighter.
@@bnjm8868 so why are the Jewish people still blood red? Makes no sense, but ok
It's crazy that this is even a discussion
Why?
Why? Are you being for real ? Or just saying why to annoy them? Do you seriously not know??
@@jadenr.j Why should not this be a discussion?
@@spadesmaster2153 bc Egypt is in Africa!! That's why it's crazy for it to be discussed.
@@spadesmaster2153 I'm going to assume you're not a copper colored individual... It's crazy because the greatness of the people I resemble always has to be a discussion.
Thank you my brother, I just don’t admire what you and your team is doing. I love what without history is doing, and is freeing our people from the negativity our people have endured. Thank so much and many blessing to all that’s accomplishing this task.
Thanks so much Ronald. Means a lot
❤️❤️❤️❤️ much love
@@withoutHistory The DNA Tribes study, which used an 8-STR marker analysis to conclude that the royal Egyptian mummies (like those of King Tutankhamun and others) were of Sub-Saharan African ancestry, has been met with substantial skepticism and criticism. There are several key points to consider when evaluating the validity of this study:
Background of the DNA Tribes Study
DNA Tribes is a private company that offered commercial genetic ancestry analysis using a set of 21 autosomal STR markers. In 2012, DNA Tribes analyzed data from the published results of a 2010 study by Zahi Hawass and his team, which involved the royal mummies, including Tutankhamun and Amenhotep III. The original 2010 study by Hawass et al. had focused on identifying familial relationships among the mummies using a small set of STR markers.
DNA Tribes took the allelic data from that study (8 STR markers, not the complete set used by the company) and compared them to their internal database of modern population STR profiles. They then published an analysis suggesting a closer genetic affinity between the mummies and modern Sub-Saharan African populations based on these STR profiles.
Major Concerns and Limitations of the DNA Tribes Study
Small Number of STR Markers (8 STRs):
The analysis was based on only 8 STR markers, which is insufficient for making reliable or detailed conclusions about ancestry or population affinity. As discussed earlier, using just 8 STR markers is problematic due to the limited resolution and potential overlap in allele frequencies across different populations.
In the context of ancestry analysis, having so few STR markers can lead to broad and potentially misleading results because it does not capture enough genetic information to differentiate between closely related populations accurately.
Allele Frequency Overlap:
STRs can exhibit high variability between individuals, but not necessarily in a way that uniquely distinguishes populations. Allele frequency overlaps between groups (especially between geographically proximate populations in North Africa, East Africa, and Sub-Saharan Africa) can make definitive conclusions difficult with such a small set of markers.
The database used by DNA Tribes might not have fully accounted for these overlaps, which can lead to conclusions that are skewed or not statistically robust.
Interpretation and Statistical Analysis:
DNA Tribes compared the allele frequencies of the 8 STR markers to their proprietary database of modern population groups. This database, however, may not have been comprehensive or consistent with other datasets used by the scientific community. In any ancestry analysis, the choice and size of the reference database play a crucial role in the conclusions.
Additionally, the methodologies for comparing these allelic frequencies and arriving at conclusions were not well-documented or peer-reviewed in scientific literature, making it hard to evaluate the validity of their claims independently.
Context of the Original Data:
The 2010 study by Hawass et al. did not aim to study population affinity but rather focused on identifying familial relationships between mummies. The 8 STR markers used in the original study were chosen for forensic and kinship purposes, not for broader population genetics or ancestry conclusions.
Using allelic data collected for one purpose (familial relationships) and repurposing it for another (population affinity) can introduce biases or misinterpretations.
Lack of Peer Review and Scientific Consensus:
The DNA Tribes study was not published in a peer-reviewed scientific journal, which is a significant limitation in terms of scientific credibility. The absence of peer review makes it difficult to assess the study's methods, statistical analyses, and conclusions against established standards in population genetics.
The broader scientific community has not accepted the conclusions drawn by DNA Tribes, and reputable scholars in Egyptology and population genetics have questioned the methodology and findings.
Ancient DNA Degradation and Contamination Concerns:
Ancient DNA studies require careful extraction and analysis methods due to the degraded and often contaminated nature of ancient DNA samples. The reliability of ancient DNA data depends heavily on the quality and authenticity of the DNA extracted.
While the 2010 study by Hawass et al. claimed to have extracted authentic DNA from the mummies, ancient DNA research requires highly rigorous protocols to minimize contamination risks. Without direct validation and more comprehensive genetic data, conclusions drawn from such ancient samples remain tentative.
Summary: Is the DNA Tribes Study Valid?
The DNA Tribes study, which used 8 STR markers to conclude that the royal Egyptian mummies were of Sub-Saharan African affinity, is not considered a scientifically valid or robust study by most population geneticists and Egyptologists. Here’s why:
Insufficient Genetic Data: Analyzing only 8 STR markers is not enough to make precise or definitive claims about population ancestry, especially in the context of complex population histories like that of ancient Egypt.
Methodological Issues: The methods used by DNA Tribes were not adequately detailed or subjected to peer review. The reliance on a proprietary and potentially incomplete database adds to the concerns.
Scientific Consensus: The broader academic community does not support the findings of the DNA Tribes study. Peer-reviewed genetic studies on ancient Egyptian remains often involve larger numbers of markers or SNPs, with more nuanced conclusions about population affinity.
While the results of the DNA Tribes analysis are an interesting hypothesis, they do not stand up to scientific scrutiny due to the limited dataset and methodological issues. Thus, its conclusions should be viewed with caution and not taken as definitive evidence of the royal mummies’ ancestry. More comprehensive studies using ancient DNA from multiple mummies and employing genome-wide analysis techniques would be needed to draw reliable conclusions about the ancestry of ancient Egyptians.
CAN'T THANK YOU ENOUGH FOR ALL YOUR WORK!!!!!!!
I think earlier egyptians were darker but it would be a stretch to call ptolemaic-era egyptians black because almost all egyptians today have an olive dark skin tone
OMG, it's called Immigration and Mixing. Just ignore the evidence. It's still coming out.
There colonizer look at the USA or new Zealand and Australia there mostly white countries but was not before so stop your nonsense
@@urbanvids7321 what does that have to do with the egyptians?
Who are the people with black so dark it is almost blue? Are they from Nubia? I knew at least three people whose skin was that beautiful dark dark color!!
@@Coldyrapsit’s anology meaning modern Egyptians like Mercian’s and Algerians in North Africa are descendants from the ottoman Muslim empire who invaded those regions in the 7th bc!
We've been through so much, yet we're still here thriving ❤
Ain’t? That’s the truth
@bayyinahzhxx7620"😶Yes, For Real.
Didn’t know de Santos was born back then. LOL now I understand the coverup. We still Rule.
God said his chosen will be here until the return of the Messiah. We ain't going nowhere!
Hats down for these investigation and awakening. Keep up this great work
Without a doubt this video is one of the very best I've ever seen and I will be paying every close attention to your channel from this point on ..
I would just like to thank you for a very informative and educational program I have seen out of all of the others I have watched
Thank you for evaluating the actual research done. So many quote research results without studying how the research was done.
Thank you for such thorough research, you have left no doubt as to who the real ancient Egyptians were.
Martin Burnal's Black Athena :The Afroasiatic Roots of Classical Civilization first published in 1987, is a book that first proposed this theory. He was shunned by academia. it's refreshing to see that the world is finaly waking up to the truth. Thank you for covering this topic.
No he popularised it in European academic circles. Cheik Anta Diop had already presented his theories to the Sorbonne in the 1960's . Including the disputed origin of homosapien sapien.
Thank you @@gussom, for the reference. I look forward to another good book. Perhaps a more accurate statement is, Martin Bernal's book was my first introduction to this theory.
Huh? You are proof that people just type anything!
They can never let the Truth be known that Ancient Khimet was "Black" and that most Ancient Pharaohs were too indeed"Black" If they were to ever admit that Ancient Khimet was "Black" would mean admitting that the Israelites were/are also "Black" This an extremely dangerous Truth that they must and have to keep hidden at all costs.
Idk bout that but if they admit it. Then it means they got all their civilization from us Africans.
@@iprofox3758 the hybrids came from caves their only legacy is conquering legacy of bloodshed k7lling stealing und destroying natives nature and good World wide
while ?
They speak with forked tongues
As a proud Irish academic Egypt was a Black African civilization anything else is just hypocrisy and jealousy. No other people if not the Africans still have cultural link legitimacy with ancient Egypt. Indeed, among many tribes, the twenty-fifth Dynasty of Pharaohs carry hausa tribe names still bore by many (Tantamani,Taharqa,Shabaka,Anlamani ...).Way before the Greek one, the city (i.e waset) that would latter become Luxor, Thebes (greek pronounciation) in Egypt was a highly armed city therefore its name (Tēgwais) which was translated "the fortified, sure" and still today Hausa in Eritrea, Sudan,Nigeria... use "Thabas" to say the same as Egyptians had +3000 years ago...Just scratching the damn surface but if we are to be sincere beyond biased interpretations we know exactly where the "crazy sounding" altered Egyptians words and names could lead us (Nebka, Medjedu, Menkaure, Khafre, Bakare, Menkhau, Djedkhau,Sahure, Saqqara). Only in hausa language is the sun still called as it was manly in ancient Egypt, Rā, (rānā, my Rā) , they call soul Re. Their royal title is still sarki or saraki while that of Egyptians was serekh (before the meaningless Pharaoh).With perfect matches Tutankhamu, karu(dogs) Ksar-baka ksar-fara, Rammessu,... can be defined by hausas who have never heard of Egypt. Moreover, Hausa syntaxes and even vocabulary are the closest to Coptic among the afro Asiatic languages and genetically the mysterious Hausas high percentage of r1b haplogroup is telling.
Beliefs had preceded history. Lastly, this is not to attribute a history to one people bus merely stating what makes sense if not Egypt will remain an eternal mystery some wish for sadly. Ancient Egypt is an achievement by Africans of all colors.
that has to be the reason some of the mummies were Caucasian with red and blonde hair, you are so intelligent.
@williamfowler616😂😂😂😂 🤣 You sound obtuse
Tell them again
@@kennethcobb7914 you sound stupid with the evidence that is available, you sound racist because the blacks have built nothing that can be tied back to them?
@@williamfowler616some? How many, 1 or 2 LOL and that can be explained easily as Africans in that region have those hair colours LOL
wh!t3s are 2 to 4000 years old, they have no genetic connection to ancient civilisations
Another incredible video. Seeing how our ancestors codified the hairstyles was sooooooo incredible. Thank you for work you are doing and the light you are shedding. Don’t remember the last time I enthusiastically liked, shared, and subscribed!
You guys were the slave owners lol
@@EnergyShifting Unfortunately, you’ve been lied to. DNA test done by DNA tribes proved the ancient Egyptians were black. Geneticist have also done Hair studies & skin tone studies which also proved they were black. Keep coping, because DNA contradicts your lies.🫵🤣🤣🤣
This video is well done! The video went into full detail discussing Kemets true inhabitants of that ancient civilization. People of African descent must take note of this and take on the responsibility to teach this to our children in order to liberate them from their oppressor. We must use knowledge to continue further study and development. We must unify in order to reclaim our ancestral homelands. Kemet must be reclaimed from the invaders who currently occupy it. It is our duty to do so.
YES!
Today's Egyptians are the mixed race descendants of ancient Egyptians who were dark. They belong there. For any foolish non Egyptians of any color who thinks they have to "liberate" today's Egyptians are risking the wrath of the ancestors. The Ancestors live ALL their descendants no matter what they look like and wish those today would get their head out of their azzez and accept each other for their heart and not their skin.
I'm a mixed race person who has seers in our family. Go ahead and risk their wrath. Don't come crying when they reject you and open a can of whoop ass on your ass.
Peace.
Dr Yosef A.A. ben Jochannan, Dr. Ivan Van Sertima, Dr. John Henrik Clarke, and Dr chancellor Williams thank you for teaching us this information before leaving us.
It’s amazing how much these people wanna replace all of us ! Everywhere we are everything we do just in general it’s enough!
Mainly the Afrocentrics
I have been debating & arguing for months now with my half black Egyptian homie & his Arabic friend about whether this was true and I was called dumb and slow and laughed at. They even sent me the video of the Egyptian girl but Here it was your video that ended the whole thing. And proved what I've been saying for months now. THANK YOU
They're your FRIENDS?
Bruh, maybe if you read more, you would have deserved their arguments!
Fantastic video. I think I'm going to have to go back and watch your earlier work.
Why would those Europeans who first found the statues destroy their noses? While there is no proof, denying that they did not want the connection to the Egyptians being black to be so evident and had some element of envy and jealousy in their hearts would be disingenuous. The sheer number of statues without noses underlines this. You gained a sub today!
Most ancient Egyptians had straight noses like most northeast African anyway. They were still darker skinned African just not related to sub Saharan African except probably the horn of africa
Sure, Africans come with all features as it is the heart of civilization. For example, there are black people in Nigeria with blue eyes and black people living on some of the pacific islands with blond hair.
My point is that there are certain features that are easily identified as African as white people don''t have those same features (ex. noses, full lips). Some Asians do but very few Whites/Europeans if any and that is a fact.@@exalteduchiha1563
All ancient civilization was melanin beings
Its a solar Planet for melanin beings. The hybrids are gmo creatures and came much later
I don't think Europeans destroyed the noses. There supposedly was a belief among Egyptians that evil entities could come to life through statues, but if the statues was partially damaged, the entities could not manifest.
@wdd3141…really that’s what you’re going with. Of course you wouldn’ t think they did it and it’s that blind thinking which allowed white washing our past to persist
I have a degree in chemistry (a physical science). I have always looked skeptically at the conclusions drawn by those in fields of social science, because there seems to be a tendency to cherry pick data. I had discussions about this with my cousin, who has a PhD from Harvard in economics. When my cousin was employed at a Beltway Bandit firm in the D.C. area he said they concluded that aircraft carriers were obsolete weapons systems. I was an active duty Navy officer at the time, and I had a different take on this.
These mo-rons (young and old) who think Egypt is outside Africa clearly failed geography.
That means anything! Iran and China are both in Asia and yet they have no connection with each other. North Africa was ALWAYS part of Mediterranean world.
Geography does not equals race nor culture!
Keep up the good work, I love your channel
Thanks!
I really enjoyed this video 👏🏾. It’s funny, I just got my 23andMe DNA results and found that I share a paternal lineage with Ramesses III! They can’t tell me nothin’ now! 😂
Not to burst your bubble but that dna test just means your the same haplo group. There are a few dozen haplo groups. Its more likely that your super distant cousins. Still neat but worth clarifying
😂😅👏🏾👏🏾👏🏾👏🏾✊🏾
same, Ramses III is our ancestor
@@wavydavybeats DNA is messing up their lie! 🤴🏿
not really. plenty of black people arent in that haplo group. and since had lighter skin and red hair, he was moe likely related to west asian than black@@Omaroy33
Excellent work and I like that you added parts of "Kings" latest video on hair.
Profile photo for Ygor Coelho
Ygor Coelho
·
Follow
Brazilian fascinated by world history, cultures & genetics.1y
Related
What do you think of people’s claims that the true “Native Americans” were black Moors?
Well, it’s obviously a ridiculous pet theory of people who wish to aggrandize and glamourize their ancestors and their ethno-geographic origins, even if it that is done to the detriment of marginalized, discriminated against, undervalued and often oppressed people, such as the Native Americans, a part of humankind that was surely far more dispossesed and genocided in the last 500 years than their own suffering peoples.
Moorish identity didn’t even exist at all, not even as a mere word, by the time the Amerindians we all know were already living all over the Americas, well before 10,000 years ago. There isn’t even one single instance of a population crossing an entire ocean many thousands of kilometers wide to settle in another continent, before about 5,000-6,000 years ago (and the first of those who did it, the Austronesians, actually navigated wide stretches of open sea from island to island, not reaching the Americas - certainly not in large enough numbers to colonize it or even to leave any indelible mark of their presence).
Take your whitewashed bs back to the caves. They love to come around black spaces to police and tell us our history.
I love your work and the music. I hope to join your channel shortly. I also like the other bloggers you mentioned earlier in your video. THANK YOU, for your hard work.
Remember Joseph was a black Hebrew Israelite (what we call the black race today) and when his brothers showed up to Egypt they couldn't tell him apart from the Egyptians. Also when Pharaoh's daughter found Moses (a Hebrew boy ) she took him in as her own . She was Egyptian and he blended in with them.
Only cacausoid skulls have been found in the Levant in the last 10000 years...
Bring it Out. All Praises to the Most High ☝🏾❤️
Beautiful, and enlightening presentation sir. I appreciate it!
Thank you brother, thank from the bottom of my heart unlike most people I was fortunate to be with many unknown scholars when pointed me in the right direction and no dna info. Beside what brother Diop had done. I hope our people awaken before it is my time to leave this physical plane
@ekfreeman1😶Right'For Real My Brother.✊🏾
6:14 What are you talking about? Ramesses ii was already dead before ramesses iii was even born and they're not even related.
I have been saying for years that Dr Hamas could not be trusted. I have watched many docu's with him in there and that was always the vibe I got from him.
Facts💯💯💯
"I have been saying" is very good evidence indeed, proportionate to the weight of this entire nonsensical argument, namely 0.
And it's "Hawas" not "Hamas", you sure you were looking at the right thing?
@@MohamedAbdelnasser-x5i There is plenty of evidence that he is biased in his opinions about certain topics. He is an old man and old school, so it is understandable. He has done some amazing work in his life time. However, It is time for some fresh eyes to look over all of the evidence and weigh in. My misspelling of his last name is because I am an English speaker and hear Arabic pronunciations differently. My brief comment was in no way an invitation to your arrogant and condescending response. Have a nice day.
@@Whisperwomaneq2 No amount of bias compares to the magnitude of wishful thinking that seeks to fabricate an entire new history appropriated from a distant land, it's fantastical.
@@Whisperwomaneq2 Nobody has the right to weigh in on our History and country with the explicit goal of appropriating it, and most certainly no such invitation has been issued to anybody who publishes such nonsense & no expertise or fresh eyes have been requested regarding this matter. Entirely fantastical.