Le Voyage Dans la Lun (A Trip to the Moon) by Georges Méliès (1902)

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 27 сер 2024
  • A Trip to the Moon (French: Le Voyage dans la Lune), alternately Voyage to the Moon, is a 1902 French black-and-white silent science fiction film. It is based loosely on two popular novels of the time: Jules Verne's From the Earth to the Moon and H. G. Wells' The First Men in the Moon.
    The film was written and directed by Georges Méliès, assisted by his brother Gaston. The film runs 14 minutes if projected at 16 frames per second, which was the standard frame rate at the time the film was produced. It was extremely popular at the time of its release, and is the best-known of the hundreds of fantasy films made by Méliès. A Trip to the Moon is the first known science fiction film, and uses innovative animation and special effects, including the well-known image of the spaceship landing in the Moon's eye.
    Includes the "lost" ending, which was rediscovered in 2002.

КОМЕНТАРІ • 963

  • @willt.9654
    @willt.9654 8 років тому +1224

    I kept turning up the volume on my phone and even said "why isn't there any sound??" before I realized how stupid I am.

    • @DavidJones-tk2op
      @DavidJones-tk2op 5 років тому +30

      No surround sound back in 1902 sadly.

    • @jorenreyes6778
      @jorenreyes6778 5 років тому +53

      They used to have live orchestras

    • @bartnowak8509
      @bartnowak8509 5 років тому +22

      Well, for me that was a solid question, as it should be with music. Sure the actual footage has no sound, but as per some other comments, these were showed with live orchestra.
      Here's one with music - so much better to watch:
      ua-cam.com/video/_FrdVdKlxUk/v-deo.html

    • @ducko1668
      @ducko1668 5 років тому

      1902

    • @n1ywb
      @n1ywb 5 років тому +1

      @@bartnowak8509 that's just the 1812 overture by tchaikowski; I dunno if the movie had an original score, but if it did, that ain't it

  • @colbybarton3402
    @colbybarton3402 10 років тому +606

    Wizard scientist shoot themselves to the moon in a bullet,fight some crab guys and their king,then fall down back to earth?
    Best Sci-Fi movie ever

    • @stainlesssteelfox1
      @stainlesssteelfox1 5 років тому +43

      It's clear these are the guys who faked the Apollo moon landings.

    • @zosoilrelucertola
      @zosoilrelucertola 5 років тому +8

      In 13min...

    • @alexanderwiseman8339
      @alexanderwiseman8339 3 роки тому +1

      They fight natives... Yeah... I know

    • @DeeHawkDK
      @DeeHawkDK 3 роки тому +3

      Remember we had just invented the typewriter. (Also the invention of combustion engines as well as discovery of human flight)

    •  3 роки тому +4

      I needed to watch this for my history of cinema exam, and honestly this is the most helpful comment

  • @budini_7926
    @budini_7926 6 років тому +667

    to this day i still find that moon disturbingly creepy af

  • @DrScrubbington
    @DrScrubbington 8 років тому +287

    It makes me feel good knowing that people had fun like this, even over a century ago...

    • @DrScrubbington
      @DrScrubbington 8 років тому

      PineApple Head xD mmmmhmmmm

    • @dibbidydoo4318
      @dibbidydoo4318 8 років тому +7

      They had fun before we invented the wheel...

    • @diegoramos9600
      @diegoramos9600 4 роки тому

      @@dibbidydoo4318 Hope to see you around xD

  • @AwesomeRobot15
    @AwesomeRobot15 8 років тому +683

    It's crazy that we actually went to the moon later in that century. People at the time they made this film probably never thought that would happen, or at least not so soon.

    • @Immortalcheese
      @Immortalcheese 7 років тому +47

      Regular flight was just being invented at that time! We didn't even have accurate topographical maps of the world yet. The earth-rise actually shows a decent rendition of Africa even before we had a better understanding of its shape

    • @pikudopikao8425
      @pikudopikao8425 6 років тому +9

      Immortalcheese, in that they already had maps of Africa. For Christ sake. Don't be so ignorant.

    • @bartsimpson6374
      @bartsimpson6374 6 років тому +2

      what do you mean by we?

    • @calumkylee
      @calumkylee 6 років тому +2

      Bart Simpson mankind

    • @bartsimpson6374
      @bartsimpson6374 6 років тому +1

      cheetahautomotive oh cause we didn't live there right?

  • @PkmariO64
    @PkmariO64 6 років тому +189

    Even at 116 years old, this film remains very impressive. The special effects were presumably amazing for the time, and they’re still great today. It’s also good to see that this film has survived so long, given the fact that it was most likely printed on flammable nitrate film, and many other films by Georges Méliès were melted down for their raw materials. Once I get all the equipment I need, I’m gonna record this short onto a VHS.

    • @Noob-me1ik
      @Noob-me1ik 2 роки тому +6

      Even at 120 years old, this film remains very impressive. The special effects were presumably amazing for the time, and they’re still great today. It’s also good to see that this film has survived so long, given the fact that it was most likely printed on flammable nitrate film, and many other films by Georges Méliès were melted down for their raw materials. Once I get all the equipment I need, I’m gonna record this short onto a VHS.

    • @doug5923
      @doug5923 Рік тому +4

      Even at 121 years old, this film remains very impressive. The special effects were presumably amazing for the time, and they’re still great today. It’s also good to see that this film has survived so long, given the fact that it was most likely printed on flammable nitrate film, and many other films by Georges Méliès were melted down for their raw materials. Once I get all the equipment I need, I’m gonna screen record this short onto a VHS.

    • @unkn0wn_kgb
      @unkn0wn_kgb 10 місяців тому +1

      It’s good to talk about the odds of why this masterpiece shouldn’t be here today, but the real value is in a content.
      It’s like a time capsule, you can see a lot about, culture, perception, human nature, this aged very well

  • @WafflePrince
    @WafflePrince 8 років тому +135

    I love how it's filmed just like a play, with everything facing the camera. The 2d plain it uses is so simplistic yet awesome

  • @agornath1
    @agornath1 5 років тому +27

    What I love most about watching old movies is its the closest thing we have to an actually going back in time. Just sitting here looking on something that happened in 1902 blows my mind. Can you imagine what we could have seen if the camara was invented 100 years earlier?

  • @Gurman8r
    @Gurman8r 10 років тому +175

    Truly a masterpiece of it's time. Melies was a visionary creating the first science fiction movie 64 years before Star Trek even came out and 75 before Star Wars.

  • @loganvararok8710
    @loganvararok8710 8 років тому +188

    Jesus, how much FUN those actors must have had. I totally envy them :D
    Fantastic movie, not just for the time it was made in, generally great. It has 100% on Rotten tomatoes btw.

    • @daviddoyle6452
      @daviddoyle6452 8 років тому +13

      I had fun just watching this thing

    • @Cheeky_Goose
      @Cheeky_Goose 7 років тому +8

      Having fun in a time where, even in America, free speech could easily get you killed, diseases were very hard to cure, and where most people were extremely poor with terrible living conditions sounds impossible.

    • @lukebell4738
      @lukebell4738 2 роки тому +2

      @@Cheeky_Goose Yet it happened

    • @ddawg3230
      @ddawg3230 Рік тому

      ​@@Cheeky_Goosewhen times are hard, it's all the more important to have fun, which is what people did. People in difficult conditions somehow have more fun (unless you think only costly things are fun) than moody well off folk having an existential crisis. Doesn't mean that their life wasn't harder or terrible often, but they managed to survive in those conditions and make art that uplifted them.

  • @horseradish4046
    @horseradish4046 9 років тому +112

    And 66 years later we had Stanley Kubrick's 2001 Space Odyssey, a scifi film that rivals the special effects of today's films. Amazing to think that there must've been people who saw both of these films as they premiered in one lifetime and how much has changed since then in science and cinematography.

    • @judgehodor2675
      @judgehodor2675 8 років тому +2

      +Remorf Chucket
      Just imagine if 2001 took more of the fantastical man in the moon visual style...

    • @bjorn-falkoandreas9472
      @bjorn-falkoandreas9472 8 років тому +8

      +Remorf Chucket He used very neat editing tricks(i.e. transformation of the telescopes to chairs). And his props are also superb. The illusion he creates is nearly perfect due to his attention to detail. Just look at when the prop cannon is fired! The smoke emits definitely where the end of the painted, yet huge cannon would be! The film is not only noteworthy because it is one of the first. It is also noteworthy because it is actually quite, quite good.
      That man knew what he was doing!
      Must've seemed like unholy magic to the people back then.

    • @zachburke8835
      @zachburke8835 8 років тому +3

      I saw the film a space odyssey without knowing when it was made and truly thought it was made in the late 90s then I looked it up and figured out it was made in '68

    • @Jotari
      @Jotari 6 років тому +7

      Perhaps a more mind blowing idea, someone lived to see both this film premiere and the actual moon landing 66ish years later. What a century, eh?

  • @koreanjaefish
    @koreanjaefish 9 років тому +617

    It was good, but sound quality's a little off.

    • @skelebones4979
      @skelebones4979 6 років тому +71

      That’s because cameras didn’t have sound technology back then. (Edited 1 year later) I was a god damn idiot lol sorry.

    • @fullonthrax7825
      @fullonthrax7825 6 років тому +119

      and that joke went right over you...

    • @stvltiloqvent
      @stvltiloqvent 6 років тому +27

      @@fullonthrax7825 ikr, what is with all these people r/wooooshing in the comments
      This is the most humourless audience I've ever had the misfortune of stumbling upon on the internet

    • @PkmariO64
      @PkmariO64 5 років тому +7

      SPOOKYMAN - r/whoooosh

    • @ducko1668
      @ducko1668 5 років тому +5

      Yes 1902 have sounds yes you ar right

  • @Holmesymom
    @Holmesymom 9 років тому +39

    Why are people looking at this from a scientific lens, when in fact, this film is one of the first (if not the first) example of the whimsy that is science fiction? Don't dissect it....revel in the splendor of this classic gem.

    • @Fractisdnb
      @Fractisdnb 8 років тому +6

      +Holmesymom without this film there would be no star wars XD

  • @FuneralFeastArt
    @FuneralFeastArt 8 років тому +21

    Visual storytelling like this is a lost art

  • @thanos9909
    @thanos9909 3 роки тому +6

    Asides from the creepy moon. This has a very cute personality and charm to it. It’s played like a comedy and a adventure film all into one. I can’t imagine how people must have reacted back in 1927. If I’m not mistaken the last surviving cast member died in 1982 so they were able to see the moon landing live on television.

  • @roystonchan944
    @roystonchan944 9 років тому +38

    Well I can't be the only one that turn up the volume despite the fact that the film's silent.

    • @scanmaster251
      @scanmaster251 5 років тому +1

      Ye thought there might have been some piano music in the background. Was great though!

  • @TheF0xskibidbopmmdada
    @TheF0xskibidbopmmdada 4 роки тому +16

    I love how rocket ships didn't exist back then so they had to be as creative as possible to find out how'd they get to the moon

  • @riamurphy9186
    @riamurphy9186 5 років тому +4

    this movie was a milestone in the movie industry. it was and still is one of the most creative and best of its time.. we should appreciate the work that went into the making of this film clip. georges melies even had to invent his own camera if my history is right. it is an amazing piece of history... and should be recognized as such. the man was a genious .. it was people like him that helped bring the world into a new era . this was the start of the movie industry..

  • @anthonycrnkovich5241
    @anthonycrnkovich5241 9 років тому +49

    Basic facts like the lack of oxygen and gravitational differentiation from the Earth were already known at the time Méliès made A TRIP TO THE MOON in 1902. This film was intended as a whimsical fantasy and should be kept in that context. If anything, the joke's on us 21st century would-be critics who let these considerations fly merrily over our 'sophisticated' heads.

  • @mavislillac2670
    @mavislillac2670 9 років тому +51

    I'm here because of hugo! Such a good book.

    • @whosthatgirl4454
      @whosthatgirl4454 5 років тому +1

      Same

    • @kasai0555
      @kasai0555 4 роки тому +2

      I watched the movie. It made me cry a few times...

    • @manuelorozco7760
      @manuelorozco7760 4 роки тому +1

      Mavis Lillac I watched the movie first then read the book.

    • @topturn9653
      @topturn9653 4 роки тому +1

      @@manuelorozco7760 Something poignant about film and Clocks. Good movie.

    • @manuelorozco7760
      @manuelorozco7760 4 роки тому

      Top Turn I know right. I didn’t expect to enjoy it so much. The Oscars convinced me

  • @beachedbum8682
    @beachedbum8682 5 років тому +15

    It seems like everything in science fiction eventually becomes reality...
    I like how the spacecraft is loaded into the cannon by chorus girls.
    The part of "The Moon" played by Larry "Bud" Melman.

  • @ramudubanu
    @ramudubanu 5 років тому +7

    Mr. Georges Méliès has done a good job. Seeing this 117 years later, in June 2019. My eyes well up.

  • @belliose
    @belliose 8 років тому +42

    This is so fantastic as a preservation of a turn-of-the 19th/20th Century state-of-the-art stage production. Melies was a great illustrator and the sets are so beautiful and intricate. The effect of having the acrobats disappear in ball of smoke is just terrific. And what a clever bit of satire coming on the heels of the works of Jules Verne and H.G. Wells. Shooting men from a cannon! With the dudes dressed like they were taking a trip across the continent! Hilarious!

  • @itiswhatitaintanditaintwha1427
    @itiswhatitaintanditaintwha1427 9 років тому +12

    They used to show this late at night with pink floyd songs in the background! I've always loved the part with the spaceship hitting the moon!Obviously!

  • @porky6884
    @porky6884 7 років тому +6

    How could anybody dislike this? It is incredible for 1902

  • @mydaddonohoe2947
    @mydaddonohoe2947 8 років тому +10

    there perception of space back in 1902 crazy movie . everyone should see this

  • @KidScipio
    @KidScipio 9 років тому +543

    what did rotten tomatoes give it when it came out

    • @kylewsimpson
      @kylewsimpson 9 років тому +32

      The rotten tomatoes website didn't exist when it came out.

    • @mattpuxty6094
      @mattpuxty6094 9 років тому +119

      It actually has a 100% rating on Rotten Tomatoes.

    • @kylewsimpson
      @kylewsimpson 9 років тому +12

      I know but you said "when it came out" and when it came out it didn't exist lol

    • @mattpuxty6094
      @mattpuxty6094 9 років тому +174

      Kyle Simpson Well, obviously! IMDB was the only film site around back then.

    • @mattpuxty6094
      @mattpuxty6094 9 років тому

      Haha, love that gif! ^

  • @kroneyt1493
    @kroneyt1493 5 років тому +17

    I'm surprised that there wasn't a remake of this in 2002 for the 100 year anniversary.

  • @czykndnature
    @czykndnature 9 років тому +42

    i love when the little gremlins explode in a cloud of dust

    • @Fractisdnb
      @Fractisdnb 8 років тому

      +Rachel Kowalczyk they're martians, don't be racist

    • @czykndnature
      @czykndnature 8 років тому

      +Frankie Ashey ok whatever i'm supposed to say, mean no offense

    • @timidkitten1709
      @timidkitten1709 5 років тому

      @@Fractisdnb lol

  • @MrJustonemorevoice
    @MrJustonemorevoice 7 років тому +9

    Over a century old
    The effects are still better than CGI

  • @felipemendez8735
    @felipemendez8735 2 роки тому +2

    I believe silent movies give the viewer the power to understand their own emotions/ emotional triggers. You cannot understand their reasoning only emotion through body language witch makes it a masterpiece.

  • @n-extrafries-surprise
    @n-extrafries-surprise 4 роки тому +3

    I find this more enjoyable than anything that's released in 2020.
    Epic Sci-Fi film

  • @2XTURBO
    @2XTURBO 10 років тому +233

    i can't stop thinking about the fact that every single one of these people are dead.

    • @vishnukumarkr3499
      @vishnukumarkr3499 7 років тому +54

      and they wud have never thought that we would be watching them on youtube....

    • @araymond1able
      @araymond1able 6 років тому +14

      There are movies in the 1950s that everyone is dead. There is no longer a person born before 1903 that is alive today. There are though one or two that played in the 1930's alive. Time flies. Things change in everyone's lives.

    • @RootedHat
      @RootedHat 5 років тому +2

      @@araymond1able you are wrong. Kane Tanaka was born in 1903:
      en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kane_Tanaka

    • @sangvoiceofficial8198
      @sangvoiceofficial8198 5 років тому

      Me too . Why ?

    • @johnster1285
      @johnster1285 5 років тому +1

      @@RootedHat Thats what the french wizards want you to think, they bought him back when they fell down to earth. Japanese how silly...

  • @daroachdoggjr5799
    @daroachdoggjr5799 8 років тому +36

    even though it's over century old, the practical effects still raise the question: "How the FUCK did they do that!?"

    • @galaxyamelia
      @galaxyamelia 8 років тому +2

      +Bolbi Stragnavowski +gnarmad there is a movie (Hugo),it mentions quite a lot about this movie in it and it shows behind the scenes-kinda.i recommend it:)

    • @MRresievil310
      @MRresievil310 8 років тому

      +Bolbi Stragnavowski They used stage elements to accomplish some effects.

    • @GullySyde28
      @GullySyde28 8 років тому

      +amelia gorochowik thanks

    • @galaxyamelia
      @galaxyamelia 8 років тому

      no problem

    • @RomanVulcan83
      @RomanVulcan83 8 років тому +3

      +Kael The Invoker +Bolbi Stragnavowski
      In terms of the film itself, they used clever editing and good choreography, and since it was on actual film, they even used double exposure as well. It also helped that Méliès was an accomplished stage magician.

  • @buttersquach7280
    @buttersquach7280 7 років тому +1

    Finally, one that has no music Thank you!!!

  • @daveharrison84
    @daveharrison84 7 років тому +3

    When this movie was made: every newly discovered land had other people already living there. It's understandable that they would expect the moon to be the same.

  • @nickjonesCSM
    @nickjonesCSM 5 років тому +3

    Thankyou for uploading this, it’s a piece of cinematic history.

  • @tor2131
    @tor2131 7 років тому +76

    my great grandgather saw this movie the day it came out

    • @estherleclaire2626
      @estherleclaire2626 5 років тому +5

      @KeCS1 yikes mine gave it a 7

    • @diordomain2630
      @diordomain2630 5 років тому +1

      Hell my grandmas parents are still alive

    • @diordomain2630
      @diordomain2630 5 років тому

      Btw not trying to say it in a disrespectful way just saying

  • @chimichangas365
    @chimichangas365 2 роки тому +2

    Crazy to think that during the filming of this movie, numerous historical empires like the Ottoman, Austro-Hungarian, German, Russian and even the Qing dynasty hasn't collapsed yet.

  • @manuelorozco7760
    @manuelorozco7760 4 роки тому +1

    Hugo sent me here of course! I was just rewatching it on Netflix last night. The first time I watched it was as a 19 year old high school senior (I’m 27 now) with my dad who’s a big Scorsese fan. And I never have seen the completed film without music until now. I like the disappearing illusions

  • @iowaguy6590
    @iowaguy6590 4 роки тому +6

    I watched a movie this evening called "Hugo." It portrays the life of this filmmaker. The movie itself is fictional but the character who made this film is in it and this movie is shown.

    • @manuelorozco7760
      @manuelorozco7760 4 роки тому +1

      Iowa guy Such a beautiful movie that has aged decently

    • @iowaguy6590
      @iowaguy6590 4 роки тому

      @@manuelorozco7760 one of my favorites

    • @manuelorozco7760
      @manuelorozco7760 4 роки тому +1

      Iowa guy I wouldn’t call it a favorite. Just a movie I really liked as a HS senior. It took me four months to see Hugo while it was still playing in 3D. Instead I decided to spend my last Thanksgiving weekend on a Sunday as a high school student seeing Happy Feet Two in IMAX 3D. Then the Oscar wins convinced me

    • @manuelorozco7760
      @manuelorozco7760 4 роки тому +1

      Iowa guy Just didn’t interest me at first. Mainly because my dad is a big Scorsese fan and my brother Elias never heard of the book who used to be a bookworm like Isabelle. But the movie exceeded my expectations

    • @manuelorozco7760
      @manuelorozco7760 4 роки тому

      Iowa guy One more thing one reason I didn’t go to a movie over the Christmas season of 2011 was busy with senior year and wasn’t in the mood.

  • @JimTheZombieHunter
    @JimTheZombieHunter 9 років тому +37

    Although obviously appearing dated in an age of being able to render anything on screen, this fascinating piece of history begs a thousand questions upon a thousand questions.
    It's very inception, securing the finances to make a film, trying to explain the very concept to a contemporary banker. Scripting, casting and directing acrobats - all concepts in their infancy.The set - appearing very shallow, even moreso than stage productions. Due to limitations of lighting and optics, or because everything previous HAD been a stage production?
    Did people travel hundreds of miles to view this film? How much might it have cost to see? Would this film have been considered adult themed in it's era? Was it a comedy or a cutting edge thriller? Were the idea of hostiles simply a plot theme, or a larger reflection of Xenophobia itself?
    The world of course was rapidly changing, many would have seen electric lighting, the telephone, the automobile. The airplane had yet to become a reality, Arguments raged for another decade and a half whether or not a projectile could in fact be sent to the moon, but it would only be another 67 years until man actually walked there. A handful of individuals would have actually had the opportunity to see this film in it's day and witness Apollo 11.
    Truly fascinating. If I were a school teacher I could almost certainly find enough material in this one small film to fill a semester of learning everything from physics to social sciences.

    • @stefrost4029
      @stefrost4029 9 років тому +6

      +Jim Vicious Try not to die from laughing at the irony of being called pretentious by someone calling themselves 'Kawaii'. ;)

    • @kawaiidesu7728
      @kawaiidesu7728 9 років тому

      Ste Bear Sometime soon you will learn to grasp sarcasm.. ;)

    • @judgehodor2675
      @judgehodor2675 8 років тому +2

      +Jim Vicious
      Hostiles were probably in there for the sake of action.
      If you really want to get into it, this isn't even close to the early days of this brand of scifi. It's basically the inevitable form ye olde travelers tails would end up taking. Things like The Odyssey and Gulliver's Travels, that are basically about getting on a boat and sailing to the place on the map marked here be dragons. But as more and more of the world is explored, that place gets moved further and further away until finally we have to move it to another world.

    • @sagaevan9641
      @sagaevan9641 8 років тому

      +Jim Vicious This comment was pointlessly fascinating.

  • @Greenpoloboy3
    @Greenpoloboy3 5 років тому +1

    Only 1902 kids will remember when this was the best video on UA-cam

  • @barghlard
    @barghlard Рік тому

    i don’t know why my librarian showed this film to a bunch of 3rd graders, but i really appreciate her for it today

    • @thatgirlshae6913
      @thatgirlshae6913 Рік тому

      Because these kids can’t imagine a world without a small device that you can carry in your pocket and use as a tv, radio, map, camera, computer, etc. this was to show the kids how far technology has really come. There was a time when technology was so poor that you could not even hear a recording

  • @RasPanman
    @RasPanman 10 років тому +12

    Awesome to see how far filmmakers have come in just over a century. Thinking about having my own bit of fun with this, via composing a soundtrack and adding my own dialogue and sound effects.

  • @fabiannerio9116
    @fabiannerio9116 6 років тому +5

    That Moon face haunts me in my dreams 😳

  • @jaredcapalario3085
    @jaredcapalario3085 4 роки тому +2

    I hate how this movie has a better plot then most movies today😂

  • @pinkgojii
    @pinkgojii 5 років тому +1

    my teacher showed this in school because we were reading and article about the history of film making

  • @ttomace
    @ttomace 9 років тому +29

    the "interstellar" of yester years

  • @daviddoyle6452
    @daviddoyle6452 8 років тому +6

    I gotta tell you this is best enjoyed with Harmon/Kardon Surround Sound.

  • @stefanm.734
    @stefanm.734 4 роки тому +1

    I know people mostly watch this for the novelty of being one of the first examples of serious filmography and the first known of sci-fi, but I do genuinely enjoy this film. There's something inherently fun about it.
    It's even better if you listen to it with music, like was intended. They would have people behind the production playing music, so to get the full experience you have to listen to music of the time.

  • @cookingshowaddict
    @cookingshowaddict 11 років тому +2

    This is unbelievably cool for 1902!

  • @15_mochraffafirmansandia69
    @15_mochraffafirmansandia69 8 років тому +230

    why there is no 4k version

    • @JohnnyProductionsOfficialTM
      @JohnnyProductionsOfficialTM 8 років тому +17

      made in 1902.

    • @G4V1N
      @G4V1N 8 років тому +33

      +90's Cartoons Official Non-Profit Network its a joke

    • @benstarx
      @benstarx 7 років тому +17

      If it's possible to get a hold of the original film, you could produce a 4K version. Question is, who has the rights to the original?

    • @DominikSobolewski
      @DominikSobolewski 7 років тому +2

      Someone doesn't know how film works.

    • @ashleighyoung4434
      @ashleighyoung4434 6 років тому

      lol

  • @modaltib880
    @modaltib880 8 років тому +44

    as it turns out Michael Jackson played the role of the moon

  • @survivorkitty3487
    @survivorkitty3487 8 років тому +1

    Actually, the FX are phenomenal for 115 years ago. Thanks for the post; it was fun. Now back to 2016.

  • @marcusolejnik259
    @marcusolejnik259 9 років тому

    Incredible special efx and plenty of risqué babes. 5 stars.

  • @MMMTheseCookies
    @MMMTheseCookies 5 років тому +5

    This could be heaven for everyone.

  • @casandjordan765
    @casandjordan765 10 років тому +6

    Really interesting thanks

  • @nasaandtheesa5400
    @nasaandtheesa5400 3 роки тому +1

    And it’s crazy to think that almost 66 years after this short film was made we landed on the moon....

  • @jeffvader811
    @jeffvader811 5 років тому

    There are people who grew up with this movie, only to see it become reality in their old age.
    What is in our fiction that will eventually become reality?

  • @jsarahina
    @jsarahina 10 років тому +140

    Hugo brought me here

    • @roberttaylor9377
      @roberttaylor9377 6 років тому +5

      same here!!!!

    • @roberttaylor9377
      @roberttaylor9377 6 років тому +2

      i loved that book!!!!

    • @Emma-R
      @Emma-R 6 років тому +2

      Yeah me too, although I knew about it before.

    • @roberttaylor9377
      @roberttaylor9377 6 років тому +1

      same, well I had seen the picture of the moon with the rocket in its eye

    • @deanna.111
      @deanna.111 6 років тому +2

      SAME! that's my favorite book of all time!

  • @TheBF3kyle
    @TheBF3kyle 10 років тому +14

    it would be good if it ws played over the piano like how it would have in the cinema

    • @TheBF3kyle
      @TheBF3kyle 10 років тому

      thats is a really good idea i will have to give that i try some time good idea! :D

    • @manuelorozco7760
      @manuelorozco7760 4 роки тому

      Logical Order I strongly agree

  • @theplaydohgirl2587
    @theplaydohgirl2587 5 років тому +1

    I love George’s Méliès!

  • @zorth4729
    @zorth4729 5 років тому +1

    If you had seen this movie as a kid, there's a strong possibility you would have seen the real moon landing only 67 years later. Weird.

  • @stefanmilosevic8899
    @stefanmilosevic8899 4 роки тому +6

    7:04 LOL the Earth Rise was made even before NASA took a pic of it.

  • @fizzledimglow3523
    @fizzledimglow3523 9 років тому +4

    So I was asked to view this film in my Film Studies class, and I daresay I actually enjoyed it. Even with no speaking the story is clear, and the special effects, while considered 'crude' to modern-day film makers, are actually incredibly intuitive for the limited tech they had at the time.
    On a related note, obviously this is meant to be no more then a tale of whimsical adventure. Sadly it seems there are others taking it much more seriously then that. It wasn't what they thought the moon was like, merely what was created by the film writers.
    One can deduce 'hidden messages' from several points in the story, however it seems some of them are a bit of a stretch, such as the wrongs of colonization. It could be taken that way, but in other ways perhaps not...
    Overall, I actually do quite enjoy it.

    • @kawaiidesu7728
      @kawaiidesu7728 9 років тому

      +Charlie Sallee It's not colonization, it's undocumented immigration.

  • @Flowerbarrel
    @Flowerbarrel 6 років тому +1

    Amazing! I've read Verne and Wells' books and thought this film was familiar! The methods of travel are funny today, and people probably thought it was kinda weird then, but I bet people really were excited about going into space. And that's another thing--it's really amazing people were thinking about going to space way back then. Though we have been fixated on the heavens for almost as long as we've been a species.

  • @jacobcannon1728
    @jacobcannon1728 7 років тому +1

    Amazing. To them, this was a dream come true. Imagine, going to the moon...that's like how we dream of time travel and how it would look. Say we managed to figure it out eventually and could go back in time, then all of our films about time travel would look in accurate hahaha. Science never ceases to surprise us, and neither do movies:) It was so cool watching this, I loved the creativity and effort put into it!

  • @zafirovillarreal3125
    @zafirovillarreal3125 8 років тому +7

    this proves that the moon is indeed made out of cheese.

  • @ender7278
    @ender7278 5 років тому +4

    I'd like to see a modern take on that.

  • @christinajohansson1700
    @christinajohansson1700 3 роки тому

    the soundtrack to this film will always be one of my favorites

  • @CleanDeeds
    @CleanDeeds Рік тому

    it’s crazy to think how much has changed since then. All the people in this video have already passed, it’s pretty unsettling…

  • @MastermindX
    @MastermindX 5 років тому +4

    Makes more sense than season 8 of game of thrones.

  • @Calimariyum
    @Calimariyum 7 років тому +5

    Watch this to Pink Floyd's Dark side of the moon album starting with "The great gig in the Sky". It goes PERFECTLYY

  • @Dragonrider1227
    @Dragonrider1227 Рік тому

    The visuals and set designs for the time are insane. This must’ve been the Star Wars of its day

  • @francisfrankie03
    @francisfrankie03 5 років тому +1

    this is so lovely

  • @aidanogden3022
    @aidanogden3022 9 років тому +136

    Still better space program then north korea

  • @binghamguevara6814
    @binghamguevara6814 4 роки тому +5

    Arguably the most iconic image of silent cinema. 6:16.

  • @StuffierHat482
    @StuffierHat482 2 роки тому +1

    the camera quality is very good for 1902

  • @coorkie
    @coorkie 9 років тому +2

    Cool, the lost ending was discovered 100 years after it was produced! :D

  • @retroaf7652
    @retroaf7652 6 років тому +9

    At the time sure it was good . But now its like watching an example of an acid trip

  • @parentsseahap5265
    @parentsseahap5265 3 роки тому +3

    Who came from Hugo

  • @evank3718
    @evank3718 8 місяців тому

    Crazy how this was such an unbelievably far fetched idea at the time, yet 67 years later, plenty of children that witnessed this could have easily witnessed the actual moon landing as well

  • @samlabo1688
    @samlabo1688 5 років тому

    I love this film, I saw it 40 yrs ago and it was amazing I was like 13

  • @ajaxthegreat8008
    @ajaxthegreat8008 3 роки тому +3

    The moon creeps the shitnout of me

  • @nolanjohnson6734
    @nolanjohnson6734 10 років тому +4

    Alright. I cannot condone any of the comments. Yes, this movie is dated, but it is better than any movie I have seen in the last 8 years, and really, all I watch from today are period movies (The Duchess, Marie Antoinette). I am an avid Silent Movie Fanatic. The beauty in these movies is their comprehension of emotion through physical action, not the effects, but surrealism helps either way. It is also the imagination. Who cares if this in scientifically incorrect? Its Art, and if you cannot pay attention or like this movie, then leave. But all I ask is that you at least try to respect it.

    • @98gwendal
      @98gwendal 6 років тому

      Come on!! You cannot say it is a better movie then good movies done the past 11 years.
      The only thing you can say that for its time it is lightyears ahead of for example the lumiere brothers and that we havent seen any movies as innovative in the last time.

    • @calumkylee
      @calumkylee 6 років тому

      ok

    • @element5377
      @element5377 5 років тому

      thankfully you dont have the power to condone or not, and its wrong to imply that you do. :) thank you freedom of speech for keeping these folks in check.

  • @ojenvahedi
    @ojenvahedi 3 роки тому

    119 years late, but I'm watching it now.

  • @user-jb7hv9tt7k
    @user-jb7hv9tt7k 3 місяці тому

    I am watching this masterpiece from 2024 🇧🇩

  • @hogiburning
    @hogiburning 5 років тому +5

    As always, adventures discover then destroy.

  • @CharlesJoseph_MSc
    @CharlesJoseph_MSc 4 роки тому +4

    9:01 that thing become mushroom ....
    Cool.

  • @AlphaCentauri24
    @AlphaCentauri24 4 роки тому +1

    10:11 The kingsmen go after the earthlings after the visitors kill their king. The last moon guy joyously does a reverse jump just before the scene change! LOL Nice touch :D

  • @skippermyson8485
    @skippermyson8485 3 роки тому +1

    When the violins kicked in I started crying.

  • @AeternaQueen
    @AeternaQueen 5 років тому +6

    Send these men to go fight Thanos.

    • @CrimsonMey
      @CrimsonMey 5 років тому +2

      with those over powered umbrellas of awesomeness. Thanos don't stand a chance.

  • @doso4782
    @doso4782 6 років тому +3

    I came here from further research of that google theme thing.

  • @MST3KLives
    @MST3KLives 4 роки тому

    Can we stop and think about how lucky we are? This blew away audiences when it came out. Can we imagine the reaction of those same audiences watching Star Wars or a Marvel movie? And now can we think about how much further entertainment will be advanced in another hundred years?

  • @louielouie22
    @louielouie22 2 роки тому +1

    Wow lovely figures for back then.

  • @hawash78
    @hawash78 8 років тому +3

    There is no sound... if it's because of copyright issues please share the name of the original soundtrack. Thanks!!

    • @maciekjankowskitomkow4107
      @maciekjankowskitomkow4107 8 років тому +1

      No, there is no sound, becouse there was no technology to make film with sound till 1927 :v (this is from 1902)

    • @tFighterPilot
      @tFighterPilot 8 років тому

      Actually, sound recording has been invented by Edison in 1877.

    • @maciekjankowskitomkow4107
      @maciekjankowskitomkow4107 8 років тому +5

      Yes, but first there was no technique to synchronize audio with wideo.

    • @Ayy_Doll_Fiddler
      @Ayy_Doll_Fiddler 7 років тому +1

      The original OST is tonight, tonight by The Smashing Pumpkins

  • @projecticeman365
    @projecticeman365 8 років тому +42

    Tonight tonight smashing pumpkins

  • @CraftyMaelyss
    @CraftyMaelyss 6 років тому +1

    Nobody *shoots* a film, like Gaston!

  • @samlabo1688
    @samlabo1688 5 років тому

    The sound track is fantastic,